FCC Web Documents citing 54.720

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.txt
  • Blessed Sacrament School, Washington, DC, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Schools and Libraries Corporation, filed April 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.txt
  • or Administrator) on November 2, 1999. Because Brevard County failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Brevard County's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on November 2, 1999. The instant Letter of Appeal was filed with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.txt
  • 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Calallen Independent School District (Calallen), Corpus Christi, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 1, 1999. The Commission received Calallen's Letter of Appeal on February 29, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.txt
  • 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Casa Grande Union High School (Casa Grande), Casa Grande, Arizona, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 21, 1999. The Commission received Casa Grande's Letter of Appeal on February 23, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.txt
  • 13, 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Covina-Valley Unified School District (Covina-Valley), Covina, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 17, 2000. The Commission received Covina-Valley's Letter of Appeal on March 27, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.txt
  • June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Enlarged City School District of Troy (Troy), Troy, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 19, 2000. The Commission received Troy's Letter of Appeal on February 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.txt
  • Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Kerkhoven-Murdock-Sunburg Independent School District No. 775 (Kerkhoven), Kerkhoven, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Kerkhoven's Letter of Appeal on May 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.txt
  • 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by the Milwaukee Jewish Day School (MJDS), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 17, 1999. The Commission received MJDS's Letter of Appeal on December 14, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.txt
  • issue here is dated February 16, 2000, but North Chicago has provided a postmark indicating that the letter was not actually issued until March 20, 2000. SLD has confirmed this error. See Letter from Tyrone Pipkin, North Chicago Community Unit School District #187, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 23, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2264A1.pdf
  • change its mode of network delivery from wireless to wireline. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Carl Schurz's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Carl Schurz subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2265A1.pdf
  • 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Central Agency for Jewish Education (CAJE), Miami, Florida, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received CAJE's Letter of Appeal on May 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2266A1.pdf
  • October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Clifton Independent School District (Clifton), Clifton, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 31, 2000. The Commission received Clifton's Letter of Appeal on May 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2267A1.pdf
  • 2000, Colonial filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 400998. On May 22, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colonial's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colonial subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2268A1.pdf
  • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 374012 and 384961. On June 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Eastern Plains' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Eastern Plains subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2269A1.pdf
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 420899. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Garden Grove's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Garden Grove subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2270A1.pdf
  • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Judge Memorial Catholic High School (Judge Memorial County), Salt Lake City, Utah, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 13, 2000. The Commission received Judge Memorial County's Letter of Appeal on April 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2271A1.pdf
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 458464. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Kanawha County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Kanawha County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2272A1.pdf
  • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Marion School District 54 (Marion County), Marion, Montana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Marion County's Letter of Appeal on September 18, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2273A1.pdf
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its requests for discounts. On July 13, 2000, SLD issued four Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Newburgh's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Newburgh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2274A1.pdf
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 305643. On June 8, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Castle's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. New Castle subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2275A1.pdf
  • SLD's decisions, stating that it did not receive the full amount requested. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Oscoda's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Oscoda subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2276A1.pdf
  • October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Pace School (Pace County), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 1, 2000. The Commission received Pace County's Letter of Appeal on June 2, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Tim O'Leary, Pinckneyville District #50, dated July 20, 1999 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Sue Andrews, Pinckneyville District #50, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 20, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Pinckneyville's Letter of Appeal seeks review of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued on July 20, 1999. Prior to filing this appeal with the Commission, however, Pinckneyville filed an appeal with SLD. See Letter from Tim O'Leary, Pinckneyville District #50, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed August 16, 1999. SLD issued an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.txt
  • 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Racine Unified School District (Racine) of Racine, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 24, 2000. The Commission received Racine's Letter of Appeal on June 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.txt
  • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 399446 and 399610. On June 22, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Saint Andrew's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Saint Andrew subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2280A1.pdf
  • requests for discounts that had not been considered by SLD. On May 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider San Juan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. San Juan subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2281A1.pdf
  • Plains filed appeals of SLD's decisions denying SLD-192955 and SLD-194558. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Scotch Plains' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Scotch Plains subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.txt
  • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library, to Federal Communications Commission (filed August 8, 2000). See Letter from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated August 1, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 431274 and 431275. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ballinger's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ballinger subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 359338. On July 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Big Rapids' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Big Rapids subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.txt
  • Caledonia North filed appeals of SLD's decisions to deny funding. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued four Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Caledonia North's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Caledonia North subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.txt
  • 22, 1999, Douglas filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 22, 1999, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Douglas' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Douglas subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.txt
  • 26, 1999 (SLD-146388); Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, dated November 2, 1999 (SLD-147484) (Funding Commitment Decision Letters). Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr. and L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 19, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Egg Harbor's Letter of Appeal seeks review of the Funding Commitment Decision Letters issued on August 10, 1999, October 26, 1999, and November 2, 1999. Prior to filing this appeal with the Commission, however, Egg Harbor filed appeals with SLD. See Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr. and L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.txt
  • 2000, Elgin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 453138. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Elgin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Elgin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 414873. On July 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Holy Family's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Holy Family subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.txt
  • 2000, Jefferson filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 365086. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.txt
  • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 275030, 275032, 275038, 275041, and 275044. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.txt
  • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 384448, 384485, and 384520. On July 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Granite's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Granite subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.txt
  • Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lexington Public Schools (Lexington), Lexington, Nebraska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 6, 2000. The Commission received Lexington's Letter of Appeal on August 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 386438. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mt. Diablo's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mt. Diablo subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.txt
  • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Oregon Trail School District (Oregon Trail), Sandy, Oregon, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Oregon Trail's Letter of Appeal on August 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.txt
  • 2000, Southeastern filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 381559. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Southeastern's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Southeastern subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.txt
  • 2000, Southwick-Tolland filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 390427. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Southwick-Tolland's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Southwick-Tolland subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 408616. On July 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Anthony's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Anthony subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 476279. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Rita's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Rita subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.txt
  • 2000 Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Yeshiva Schools (Yeshiva), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 2000. The Commission received Yeshiva's Letter of Appeal on August 30, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.txt
  • 2000, Austin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 400580. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Austin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Austin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.txt
  • 2000, Bloomfield filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 431262. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bloomfield's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bloomfield subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.txt
  • 2000, Cumberland filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 348856. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Cumberland's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Cumberland subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Eastern Plains Instructional Television Consortium (Eastern Plains), Logan, New Mexico, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 9, 2000. The Commission received Eastern Plains' Letter of Appeal on April 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.txt
  • discounts to services that were not requested in its application. On July 6, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Florence Carlton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Florence Carlton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its request for funding. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Florence's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Florence subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School District 156, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 8, 2000. See Letter from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School District 156, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed May 4, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 396144. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Moon Area's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Moon Area subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 434670. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider North Attleborough's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. North Attleborough subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.txt
  • 2000, Gildford filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 312153. On June 2, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gildford's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gildford subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.txt
  • 31, 2000, Roosevelt Elementary filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Roosevelt Elementary's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Roosevelt Elementary subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kay Berry, Simpson County School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed June 23, 2000). See Letter from Jack M. McAlpin, Simpson County School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 2, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 421231. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider South Heart's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. South Heart subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.txt
  • stating that it should have received additional funding. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Peter & Paul's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Peter & Paul subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.txt
  • Patrick's filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Patrick's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Patrick subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 321400. On July 6, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Swift River's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Swift River subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.txt
  • 2000, Vacaville filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 395593. On July 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Vacaville's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Vacaville subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.txt
  • 2000, AECSD filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 404676. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider AECSD's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. AECSD subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.txt
  • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 346232 and 346283. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Chisago Lakes' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Chisago Lakes subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.txt
  • 2000, Colton filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 424483. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.txt
  • 2000, Durham filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 367094. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Durham's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Durham subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.txt
  • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Elko County School District (Elko County), Elko, Nevada, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Elko County's Letter of Appeal on July 20, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.txt
  • 2000, Girard filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 324273. On July 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Girard's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Girard subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.txt
  • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 435901, 435905, and 458591. On August 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider McIntosh's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. McIntosh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.txt
  • 13, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative (Northeast), Hayti, South Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 2, 2000. The Commission received Northeast's Letter of Appeal on July 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.txt
  • 357508 due to SLD's conclusion that the funding request included ineligible services. On July 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ryan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ryan subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Traverse City Area Public Schools (Traverse City), Traverse City, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Traverse City's Letter of Appeal on July 11, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.txt
  • 2000, Xavier filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 418165. On August 9, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Xavier's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Xavier subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.txt
  • SLD's decision to deny FRNs 198760 and 198761. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ESU No. 6's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. ESU No. 6 subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2575A1.pdf
  • for the period between January 1999 to June 1999. On August 12, 1999 and August 7, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Delta/Greely's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Delta/Greely subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.txt
  • 18, 2000, Houston Independent filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On July 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Houston Independent's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Houston Independent subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 324467. On September 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bryn Athyn's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bryn Athyn subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.txt
  • 8, 2000, EDmin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On September 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider EDmin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. EDmin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.txt
  • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by James Ward Elementary School (James Ward), Chicago, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 2, 2000. The Commission received James Ward's Letter of Appeal on September 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.txt
  • 7, 2000, Madera filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On September 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Madera's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Madera subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.txt
  • Released: November 29, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Norwell Public Schools (Norwell), Norwell, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 10, 2000. The Commission received Norwell's Letter of Appeal on September 11, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.txt
  • to approve its funding at a lower amount than requested. On August 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Richland Colfax's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Richland Colfax subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.txt
  • not receive the amount requested for Funding Request Number 397275. On August 17, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Rosa's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Rosa subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.txt
  • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 366305 and 366344. On August 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Ynez's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Ynez subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.txt
  • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint John Bosco High School (Saint John Bosco), Bellflower, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 2, 2000. The Commission received Saint John Bosco's Letter of Appeal on September 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.txt
  • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by South Brunswick Township School District (South Brunswick Township), Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 23, 2000. The Commission received South Brunswick Township's Letter of Appeal on June 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.txt
  • Released: November 29, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Westbrook High School (Westbrook), Westbrook, Connecticut, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 17, 2000. The Commission received Westbrook's Letter of Appeal on October 2, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.txt
  • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 28, 2000. Because Northwestern failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Northwestern's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on July 28, 2000. Northwestern filed an appeal of the funding decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.txt
  • two appeals of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 429028, 431862, and 431875. On August 29, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Western Heights' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Western Heights subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2785A1.txt
  • from the date of public notice of such action. 47 C.F.R. � 1.108. Request for Review by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 00-2555 (rel. November 13, 2000). A request for review of an Administrator's decision must be filed within thirty days of the date of the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). 3 b c � � � � � � � " � � � � � � � � � � 0 1 2 3 b � � � � � � � � � � � 0 1 2 3 � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.txt
  • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 369592, 369658, and 369691. On August 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Soille San Diego's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Soille San Diego subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.txt
  • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lyman School District No. 42-1 (Lyman), Presho, South Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 2000. The Commission received Lyman's Letter of Appeal on September 6, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.txt
  • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: January 10, 2000 Released: January 11, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Denison Independent School District of Denison, Texas that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 11, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.txt
  • April 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Amherst Independent School District (Amherst), Amherst, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 5, 2001. The Commission received Amherst's Request for Review on March 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.txt
  • 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Harlandale Independent School District (Harlandale), San Antonio, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 2, 2001. The Commission received Harlandale's Request for Review on April 3, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.txt
  • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 405993, 406305, 406330, 406350, and 420208. On March 16, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.txt
  • funding. The Letter of Appeal was dated December 22, 2000. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Montgomery County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Montgomery County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1054A1.txt
  • days from the date of public notice of such action. 47 C.F.R. � 1.108; see Request for Review by St. Christopher-Ottilie, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-921 (rel. April 13, 2001). A request for review of an Administrator's decision must be filed within thirty days of the date of the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1054 % q r q q
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 327849. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider District 4's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. School Administrative subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.txt
  • April 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Tyrone Area School District (Tyrone), Tyrone, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 26, 2001. The Commission received Tyrone's Request for Review on March 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.txt
  • service line and therefore, Qwest could not give them discounted internal connections. On March 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Calhan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Calhan subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 423676. On March 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider North Babylon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. North Babylon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.txt
  • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Beth Chana Elementary and High School for Girls (Beth Chana), Brooklyn, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2001. The Commission received Beth Chana's Request for Review on April 24, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.txt
  • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Ellenville Central School District (Ellenville), Ellenville, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 15, 2000 and a waiver of our appeal rules. The Commission received Ellenville's Request for Review on February 12, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Ellenville asserts that it did not receive the June 15, 2000 decision letter and became aware of the decision on January 24, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.txt
  • 2, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, dated February 23, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letter). Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 26, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.txt
  • District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 20, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, dated March 23, 2001 (Year 2 Application Return Letter). Request for Review from James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 17, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.txt
  • School for Children, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 23, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, dated March 23, 2001. Request for Review from Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 23, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.txt
  • to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated May 8, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dean Werstler, Olmstead Falls City Schools, dated August 7, 2000. Letter from William R. Schuck, Olmstead Falls City Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated January 18, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.txt
  • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Ocean Beach School District No. 101 (Ocean Beach), Long Beach, Washington, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 13, 2000. The Commission received Ocean Beach's Request for Review on April 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. Ocean Beach
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.txt
  • entity information. On June 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider NJ State Library's appeal requesting a billed entity information change because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. NJ State Library subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.txt
  • Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 31, 2001. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, dated January 5, 2001 (Commitment Adjustment Letter). See Letter from Letter from Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 30, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.txt
  • 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ONC's March 26, 2001 appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 5, 2000 Administrator Letter rejecting ONC's application for failure to meet Minimum Processing Standards was issued. ONC subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 372633. On May 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bnos Zion's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bnos Zion subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 13, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed November 6, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.txt
  • appeal of the funding decision with SLD on June 15, 2000. SLD dismissed the appeal as untimely. Newburgh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal. Because Newburgh failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within thirty days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it filed a supplemental request for waiver of the 30-day appeal period on September 19, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline applies to all requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.txt
  • 23, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Sutton School, CNSU (Sutton County), Lyndonville, Vermont, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 17, 2000. The Commission received Sutton County's Letter of Appeal on November 9, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.txt
  • (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 20, 2000. Because Chabad failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Chabad's Request for Waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on October 20, 2000. Chabad filed an appeal of the funding decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1511A1.txt
  • this decision to SLD, and to the Commission on April 2, 2001. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of SLD decisions do not permit applicants to seek reconsideration of the Administrator's decision from the Administrator. The Commission received Northern Berkshire's Request for Review on April 2, 2001 seeking review of a decision issued by SLD on February 23, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Northern Berkshire's Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.txt
  • 4." On April 26, 2001, Petoskey filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On May 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Petoskey's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Petoskey subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.txt
  • decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on July 19, 2000 which rejected St. Mary's FCC Form 471, Services Ordered and Certification Form, because it was submitted after the close of the 30-day filing deadline for Funding Year 2 . The Commission received St. Mary's Request for Review on August 31, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.txt
  • College (West Shore), Scottville, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 15, 2000 to deny West Shore payment of an invoice it submitted for services it provided to Mason County District Library, Ludington, Michigan. The Commission received West Shore's Request for Review on June 20, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.txt
  • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by New Kensington-Arnold School District (New Kensington-Arnold), New Kensington, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2001. The Commission received New Kensington-Arnold's Request for Review on June 19, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.txt
  • July 6, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Sampson-Clinton Public Library (Sampson-Clinton), Clinton, North Carolina, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 25, 2001. The Commission received Sampson-Clinton's Request for Review on June 27, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.txt
  • and became aware of the decision only after having contacted SLD. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on June 30, 2000. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Saint Thomas Aquinas School (Saint Thomas Aquinas), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 15, 2000. The Commission received Saint Thomas Aquinas's Request for Review on April 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.txt
  • 30 days after the Minimum Processing Standards Letter was issued. In their Request for Review, Praxis asserts that they did not receive the Minimum Processing Standards Letter until almost a month after the letter was dated. Praxis provides a copy of the postmark of the Minimum Processing Standards Letter, indicating the letter was issued on August 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.txt
  • 2001 Released: July 17, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rice Independent School District (Rice Independent), Rice, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division. The Commission received Rice Independent's Request for Review on June 1, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.txt
  • 2001 Released: July 17, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Scott County School District (Scott County), Forest, Mississippi, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division. The Commission received Scott County's Request for Review on May 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 381559. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Yeshivas Boyan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Yeshivas Boyan subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.txt
  • which challenged SLD's decision to deny FRNs 476986, 476987, 476988, and 476993. On May 30, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Pomona's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Pomona subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1724A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1724A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c). Copan Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 5501, para. 6. LA Unified Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3496, para. 9. Id. Id. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any party aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. See Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Lac du Flambeau Public School, filed July 28, 2000. See Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Kingsport City Schools, filed July 31, 2000; Requests for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Lee County School District filed, June 8, 2000 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.txt
  • Decision Letter approving East Side Union's request for funding for internal connections. East Side Union filed appeals of the funding decision with SLD on December 8, 1999 and January 5, 2000. SLD dismissed the appeals as untimely. East Side Union subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal and request for waiver of the 30-day deadline for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline applies to all requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Bristol Bay Borough School District (Bristol Bay), Naknek, Alaska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division issued on May 4, 2001. The Commission received Bristol Bay's Request for Review on July 6, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.txt
  • the record indicates that SLD did issue a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 21, 2000 and mailed it to the address provided by Salem on its FCC Form 471. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for relief. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.txt
  • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by the Washington Parish School District (Washington Parish), Franklinton, Louisiana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 21, 2001. The Commission received Washington Parish's Request for Review on March 26, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.txt
  • Released: August 1, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Zeeland Public Schools (Zeeland), Zeeland, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 29, 2001. The Commission received Zeeland's Request for Review on May 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.txt
  • 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to David Boison, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, dated March 22, 2001. Id. Letter from R. Brian Johnson, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 6, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to David Boison, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, dated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.txt
  • 2000, Gallatin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 383557. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gallatin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gallatin subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.txt
  • of the district's vendors indicating that a decision had been made. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on July 21, 2000. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. � 1.113 (permitting actions taken on delegated authority to be reconsidered within 30 days of the public notice of the action). Remand Order, paras. 8-9. Id., para. 8; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rick Barber, Mercer County Area Vocational-Technical School, dated May 12, 2000 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720; see, e.g., Request for Review by North Babylon Union Free School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-160553, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-1165 (Act. Pol. Div. rel. May 9, 2001). Letter from Rick Barber, Mercer County Area Vocational-Technical School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.txt
  • processed. On January 8, 2001, Monessen filed three appeals of SLD's decision. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued three Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Monessen's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Monessen subsequently filed the instant Requests for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.txt
  • Bureau Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., dated July 5, 2001. Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 31, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.txt
  • 23, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Fairland Public School District I-31 (Fairland), Fairland, Oklahoma, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 13, 2001. The Commission received Fairland's Request for Review on August 15, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.txt
  • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by New Plymouth School District No. 372 (New Plymouth), New Plymouth, Idaho, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 18, 2001. The Commission received New Plymouth's Request for Review on February 20, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.txt
  • Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 6, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, dated July 23, 2001. Request for Review from Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 6, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 333195. On November 28, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Atlantic County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Atlantic County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.txt
  • 2000, Clearview filed an appeal requesting additional funding for Funding Year 3. On November 28, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Clearview's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Clearview subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.txt
  • January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Granville Public Schools (Granville), Granville, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 18, 2000. The Commission received Granville's Letter of Appeal on December 12, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by East Greenbush Central Schools (East Greenbush), East Greenbush, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 13, 2001. The Commission received East Greenbush's Request for Review on August 15, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, dated June 9, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 20, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Leon County's Letter of Appeal seeks review of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued on June 9, 2000. At the same time Leon County filed this appeal with the Commission, Leon County also filed an appeal with SLD. See Letter from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Levittown Union Free School District (Levittown Union), Levittown, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 10, 2000. The Commission received Levittown Union's Letter of Appeal on November 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.txt
  • Released: January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Pluralistic School (Pluralistic), Santa Monica, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Pluralistic's Letter of Appeal on December 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.txt
  • Decision Letter were wrong and the total pre-discount amount should be changed. On November 17, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Solon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Solon subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.txt
  • for the rest of Funding Year One, i.e. through to June 1999. On May 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider MetroCon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. MetroCon subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.txt
  • School, Baltimore, Marlyand, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 25, 2000. See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated July 24, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.txt
  • Federal Communications Commission, filed August 24, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, dated July 23, 2001. Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 23, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.txt
  • 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review of the Congregation Bnos Yaakov (Bnos Yaakov), Lakewood, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 18, 2000. The Commission received Bnos Yaakov's Request for Review on September 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. A review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.txt
  • 2001, DeKalb filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 698159. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider DeKalb's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. DeKalb subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.txt
  • 2001, Estelline filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 305555. On August 3, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Estelline's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Estelline subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.txt
  • asks us to ensure that sufficient funds will be available should these appeals be successful by authorizing SLD to apply any Funding Year 1 committed funds that went unused to the funding of successful Funding Year 1 appeals if necessary. For the reasons discussed below, we deny part of the Request for Waiver, and dismiss the remaining part. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any party seeking review of a decision issued by the Administrator must file its request with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. E-Rate Central is an educational services company that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.txt
  • Released: September 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by City of Cameron (Cameron), Cameron, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Cameron's Request for Review on September 11, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.txt
  • 2001, Sealy filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 613865. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Sealy's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Sealy subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.txt
  • 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Shelby City Schools (Shelby City), Shelby, Ohio, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Shelby City's Request for Review on September 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 509467. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Cecelia's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Cecelia subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.txt
  • 24, 2001, Sacred Heart filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Sacred Heart's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Sacred Heart subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.txt
  • SLD's decision to deny FRN 501079. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Francis de Sales' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Francis de Sales subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, a party must file its appeal with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision it seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to any requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.txt
  • decision to treat Mississippi DOE's September 13, 1999 appeal as untimely filed. On March 20, 2000, SLD issued another letter stating that Mississippi DOE's October 18, 1999 appeal was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters and thus would not be considered. Mississippi DOE subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.txt
  • 2000 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2000. See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 28, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.txt
  • 28, 2001, Belt Schools filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On September 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Belt Schools' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Belt Schools subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.txt
  • Released: October 16, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Hazelwood School District (Hazelwood), Florissant, Missouri, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 27, 2001. The Commission received Hazelwood's Request for Review on September 28, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.txt
  • 2001, Elizabeth filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 551356. On September 10, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Elizabeth's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Elizabeth subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.txt
  • Company, to William D. Piotrowski, Sabal Palm Elementary School, dated July 16, 2001; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to William D. Piotrowski, Wesson Elementary School, dated July 16, 2001. Request for Review from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 27, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.txt
  • applicant. On August 24, 2001, Mid-Peninsula filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mid-Peninsula's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mid-Peninsula subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.txt
  • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Deep River-Millersburg Community School District (Deep River-Millersburg), Millersburg, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 27, 2001. The Commission received Deep River-Millersburg's Request for Review on October 9, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 684292 and 684293. On August 31, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider McClave's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. McClave subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.txt
  • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 553491 and 553492. On September 10, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Saint Patrick's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Saint Patrick subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 443629 and 443634. On September 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Columbia's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Columbia subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.txt
  • Released: October 31, 2001 By the Common Carrier Bureau, Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rochester Public Schools (Rochester), Rochester, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 13, 2001. The Commission received Rochester's Request for Review on September 17, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.txt
  • 2. See supra note 1. Letter from Chris Rosenthal, St. Mary Magdalen, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 12, 1999 (relating to April FCC Form 471); Letter from Chris Rosenthal, St. Mary Magdalen, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 12, 1999 (relating to October FCC Form 471). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2521 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2521 � - - � - . / 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.txt
  • Crowe, Paso Robles Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 20, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Peggy Edwards, Paso Robles Public Schools, dated July 26, 2001. Request for Review from Laurie Crowe, Paso Robles Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 20, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.txt
  • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lake Havasu Unified School District (Lake Havasu), Lake Havasu City, Arizona, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 25, 2000. The Commission received Lake Havasu's Letter of Appeal on October 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.txt
  • this Request for Review was filed. The proffered letter without more, is insufficient to demonstrate that an appeal was filed with SLD. We find no reason to depart from this finding in the instant case. It is well established law that the absence of official record of an event is the evidence of the non-occurrence of the event. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.txt
  • 2001, Whitehall filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 303830. On August 3, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Whitehall's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Whitehall subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.txt
  • the correct form and by which Lakeshore resubmitted a correct FCC Form 471. On September 24, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lakeshore's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Rejection Letter was issued. Lakeshore subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.txt
  • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 654207 and 655521. On August 24, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mary O'Brien's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mary O'Brien subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.txt
  • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Max Rowland, Wapanucka Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 24, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Max Rowland, Wapanucka Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 13, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.txt
  • that it was rejected for lack of an original ink signature. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bais Yaakov's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Rejection Letter was issued. Bais Yaakov subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.txt
  • call if its submission of missing information from its Form 471 was incorrect. On September 10, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Louisville's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Rejection Letter was issued. Louisville subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.txt
  • 2000, Northeastern filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 397733. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Northeastern's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Northeastern subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.txt
  • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by St. Raymond Regional School (St. Raymond), Villas, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on June 20, 2000. The Commission received St. Raymond's Request for Review on October 3, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Scott Garrigan, Bethlehem Area School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 15, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Scott Garrigan, Bethlehem Area School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 2, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.txt
  • Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator) on July 23, 2001. Because Lincoln's appeal to SLD regarding the funding decision was not filed within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Lincoln's Request for Review and its Request for Waiver. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted above, SLD issued the Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 23, 2001. Lincoln filed an appeal of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.txt
  • (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator) on June 23, 2000. Because Pinellas failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Pinellas's Request for Review and its Request for Waiver. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on June 23, 2000. Pinellas filed an appeal of the funding decision with SLD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.txt
  • (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 23, 2001. Because Potter Valley failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Potter Valley's Request for Review and its Request for Waiver. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted above, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 23, 2001. Potter Valley filed an appeal of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.txt
  • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Somerton School District No. 11 (Somerton), Somerton, Arizona. Somerton seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 18, 2000. The Commission received Somerton's Request for Review on June 22, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.txt
  • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Somerton School District No. 11 (Somerton), Somerton, Arizona. Somerton seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on April 13, 2000. The Commission received Somerton's Request for Review on June 12, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.txt
  • 2000, Lakeview filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 409295. On November 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lakeview's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lakeview subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Washington Community School District (Washington Community), Washington, Iowa. Washington Community seeks review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 22, 2001. The Commission received Washington Community's Request for Review on September 24, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.txt
  • Review filed by Prospect School District 59 (Prospect), Prospect, Oregon, on October 2, 2000. In the Request for Review, Prospect seeks review of a funding commitment decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 26, 2000. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Prospect's Request for Review. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted above, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on May 26, 2000. Prospect filed an appeal of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.txt
  • dismisses the Request for Review filed by Blessed Sacrament - St. Gabriel High School (Blessed Sacrament), New Rochelle, New York. Blessed Sacrament seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 21, 2001. The Commission received Blessed Sacrament's Request for Review on September 27, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.txt
  • (Request for Review). Id. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). Letter from Jean Luker, Washington County Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 9, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.txt
  • the Common Carrier Bureau, Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Waukegan Public Schools (Waukegan), Waukegan, Illinois. Waukegan seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 20, 2001. The Commission received Waukegan's Request for Review on September 20, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.txt
  • a request for discounts for internet access, Funding Request Number (FRN) 65038. On November 7, 2000, Solon appealed SLD's decision, and on November 17, 2000, SLD denied the appeal. Subsequently, on December 5, 2000, Solon filed a Request for Review with the Commission. The Commission denied Solon's Request for Review on the basis that it was untimely filed. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 397276 and 397523. On October 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Matawan-Aberdeen's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Matawan-Aberdeen subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.txt
  • Birns Telecommunications Inc, was not included in the decision letter. On September 28, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bnos Zion's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bnos Zion subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.txt
  • the percentage for its school district was 75%, and challenging the difference. On September 21, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Buffalo's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Buffalo subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.txt
  • 2001, Colusa filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 580276. On August 31, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colusa's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colusa subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.txt
  • 2001, Johnson filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 515177. On October 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Johnson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Johnson subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.txt
  • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 651500, 655033, and 655436. On September 28, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Starr King-Edison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Starr King-Edison subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.txt
  • Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation and General Communications, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 22, 2001 (Joint Motion for Extension of Time). Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Unicom, Inc., CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Request for Review, filed October 9, 2001 (Request for Review), at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 54.720. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2811 � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.txt
  • filed by Grand Isle Supervisory Union (Grand Isle), North Hero, Vermont. Grand Isle seeks reconsideration of a decision by the Bureau dismissing Grand Isle's Request for Review as untimely. For the reasons discussed below, the Petition is denied. To the extent that Grand Isle also requests a waiver of the Commission's rules, we deny that request as well. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.txt
  • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Larry Garrow, Saranac Central School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 26, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Larry Garrow, Saranac Central School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 25, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.txt
  • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Mt. Diablo Unified School District (Mt. Diablo), Concord, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 26, 2000. The Commission received Mt. Diablo's Letter of Appeal on November 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Algonquin Regional High (Algonquin), Northborough, Massachusetts. Algonquin seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 6, 2001. The Commission received Algonquin's Request for Review on October 3, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.txt
  • on Appeal. Taylor County also attached the FCDLs for application numbers 241393, 241462, 245426, and 245519 to its Request for Review; the Administrator issued three of these Funding Commitment Decision Letters on July 23, 2001 and the fourth on August 7, 2001. Taylor County's Request for Review asks that the Commission "review this material, and override [USAC's] decision..." Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.txt
  • By the Common Carrier Bureau, Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Fairhill School (Fairhill), Dallas, Texas. Fairhill seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Fairhill's Request for Review on September 11, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Genevieve Prahasto, Island Park Library Friends, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 13, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Genevieve Prahasto, Island Park Library Friends, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 10, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.txt
  • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Orange City Christian School (OCCS), Orange City, Iowa. OCCS seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on February 5, 2001. The Commission received OCCS's Request for Review on May 7, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Eva Kunz, Knowlton Township Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 30, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Eva Kunz, Knowlton Township Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated July 27, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by New Brighton Area School District (New Brighton), New Brighton, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 11, 2000. The Commission received New Brighton's Letter of Appeal on October 16, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to funding. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Hampshire School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. New Hampshire School subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.txt
  • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 19, 2000. Because Ashby failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Ashby's Request for Review and its request to waive the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on May 19, 2000. Ashby filed an appeal of the funding decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 1, 2001. See Letter from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.txt
  • 9, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Daingerfield-Lone Star Independent School District (Daingerfield), Daingerfield, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 4, 2000. The Commission received Daingerfield's Request for Review on October 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.txt
  • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Requests for Review filed by Hawthorn School District 73 (Hawthorn), Vernon Hills, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Hawthorn's Request for Review on November 17, 2000 and December 4, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because Hawthorn failed to timely appeal the April 14, 2000 decision to either the Commission or SLD, the Requests for Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.txt
  • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Newport Public School District (Newport County), Newport, Rhode Island, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 8, 2000. The Commission received Newport County's Letter of Appeal on October 30, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.txt
  • February 9, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Peach Public Libraries (Peach), Fort Valley, Georgia, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 19, 1999. The Commission received Peach's Request for Review on May 7, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.txt
  • 2000, Windham filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 390370. On December 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Windham's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Windham subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.txt
  • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Half Hollow Hills School District (Half Hollow), Dix Hills, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 8, 2000. The Commission received Half Hollow's Request for Review on December 22, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 23, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 23, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 410362. On September 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Ana's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Ana subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 485878. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Tuckahoe Union's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Tuckahoe Union subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.txt
  • Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 17, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Susan Hite, Crown King Public Library, dated April 14, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Request for Review from Susan Hite, Crown King Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 24, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.txt
  • 2000, Dietrich filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 336896. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Dietrich's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dietrich subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.txt
  • decision did not reflect the funding period that was requested. On May 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Grant County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Grant County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.txt
  • Highway Christian Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 30, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, dated September 29, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Request for Review from Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 30, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.txt
  • discount instead of the requested 80 percent discount. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Pius V's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Pius V subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.txt
  • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 462972, 462973, and 462974. On January 19, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider USD's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. USD subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.txt
  • Commission, filed July 13, 2000 (Request for Review). See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, dated June 30, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 13, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.txt
  • Commission, filed July 13, 2000 (Request for Review). See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, dated June 30, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 13, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.txt
  • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Salem County Vocational Technical Schools (Salem County), Woodstown, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on October 31, 2000. The Commission received Salem County's Request for Review on December 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.txt
  • This order addresses Requests for Review filed by the Caddo Parish School Board (Caddo Parish), Shreveport, Louisiana, on November 9, 1999 and November 12, 1999, seeking review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 12, 1999, regarding Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) 216602 and 252147, respectively. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Request for Review regarding FRN 252147 was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.txt
  • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 275740 and 275741. On May 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Little Miami's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Little Miami subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.txt
  • Mass. DOE's argument that it should be excused because it lacked notice regarding the consequences of failing to comply with SLD's document requests is both contrary to the record and unreasonable on its face. Finally, we note that Mass. DOE was not entitled to relief from SLD for the additional reason that its appeal to SLD was untimely. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Here, SLD issued its Funding Commitment Decision Letter on December 15, 1999. Mass. DOE did not file its appeal with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 29, 2001. See Letter from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.txt
  • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rome City School District (Rome City), Rome, Georgia, seeking review of two decisions issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on December 8, 2000 and December 22, 2000. The Commission received Rome City's Request for Review on March 14, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.txt
  • 2001, Lemoore filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 402771. On February 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lemoore's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lemoore subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.txt
  • York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from Joseph Fatuzzo, St. Christopher-Ottilie, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 12, 2001. See Letter from Joseph Fatuzzo, St. Christopher-Ottilie, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 12, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.txt
  • January 29, 2001 decision dismissing Levittown's Request for Review as untimely. E-Rate Central also requests that we instruct the Universal Service Administrative Company to implement appeal notification procedures for its Schools and Libraries Division (SLD). For the reasons set forth below, we deny Levittown's Petition for Reconsideration. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any appeal seeking review of a decision issued by SLD, must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered filed with the Commission only upon receipt. SLD denied Levittown funding in an Administrator's Decision on Appeal letter dated May 10, 2000. The Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Perth Amboy's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Perth Amboy subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.txt
  • Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). Pleasantville seeks review of SLD's denial of its application for Year 2 funding under the schools and libraries universal service support program. Because Pleasantville failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the corresponding Funding Commitment Decision Letter, we deny Pleasantville's Request for Review. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered filed with the Commission only upon receipt. On April 27, 2001, SLD issued Funding Commitment Decision Letters (FCDLs) denying Pleasantville's applications. It explained, ``Applicant has not demonstrated that it has access to adequate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1115A1.txt
  • for Review by Prince George's County Schools, at para. 4.. Petition for Reconsideration, at 2-3. Petition for Reconsideration, at 3. Id. Id. Id. at 4 (emphasis in original). See Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 901 F.2d 147, 153 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1990); Functional Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 274 F.2d 543, 546 (D.C. Cir. 1958). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720; see Request for Review (filed on October 2, 2001); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to John D. Harrington, Funds for Learning, dated September 4, 2001. Petition for Reconsideration, at 3-4. Voice Stream PCS I License, 16 FCC Rcd 7584, para. 8 (Enf. Bur. 2001); see also Jelks v. Federal Communications Commission, 146 F.3d 878, 881
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.txt
  • Independent School District (Ropes ISD), Ropesville, Texas. Ropes ISD seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 21, 2001. The Commission received Ropes ISD's Request for Review on April 1, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.txt
  • by Walker-Hackensack-Akeley Public Schools, Independent School District 113 (Walker-Hackensack), Walker, Minnesota. Walker-Hackensack seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 2, 2001. The Commission received Walker-Hackensack's Request for Review on August 2, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.txt
  • 28, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Forestburg's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 16, 2001 Block 5 Rejection Letter was issued. Forestburg subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.txt
  • filed by Chawanakee Joint Elementary School District (Chawanakee), North Fork, California. Chawanakee seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 6, 2001. The Commission received Chawanakee's Request for Review on September 6, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.txt
  • 555547. On February 11, 2002, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Bloomingdale's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bloomingdale subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Easton Area's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Easton Area subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.txt
  • by Wheeling Catholic Elementary School (Wheeling), Wheeling, West Virginia. Wheeling seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 27, 2001. The Commission received Wheeling's Request for Review on January 28, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.txt
  • because changing the site identifier on the FRNs would match each site identifier with the wrong contract number, service description Attachment, and Billing Account number. We therefore find that the Letter of Appeal submitted to SLD by South San Antonio on August 17, 2000 was subject to the appeals period established in section 54 of the Commission regulations. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.txt
  • 545533. On February 11, 2002, SLD issued an Administrator's Decisions on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Fairfield's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Fairfield subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.txt
  • 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Plymouth's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the March 6, 2001 Year 4 Certification Rejection Letter was issued. Plymouth subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Plymouth's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 30-day period, we affirm the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.txt
  • of Bangor Public Library (Bangor), Bangor, Maine. Bangor seeks review of a funding commitment decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on November 16, 2001. The Commission received Bangor's Request for Review on April 24, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeanne Buschart, Brentwood High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 15, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Jeanne Buschart, Brentwood High School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 21, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.txt
  • (The New School), Washington, DC. The New School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on February 26, 2002. The Commission received The New School's Request for Review on May 7, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Reavis School's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the January 11, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Reavis School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because Reavis School's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.txt
  • filed February 13, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Larry L. Davis, Prairie Home R-V School District, dated January 30, 2001. See Letter from Dr. Larry L. Davis, Prairie Home Public Schools R-V, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 9, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Request for Review by Los Angeles Unified School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Annmarie Carter, Shenandoah Valley School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 6, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Annmarie Carter, Shenandoah Valley School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 4, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.txt
  • G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lloyd Wright, Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 23, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Lloyd Wright, Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 29, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Electronic mail from Ramonita Vazquez Diaz, Escuela Moises Melendez, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 29, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Ramonita Vazquez Diaz, Escuela Moises Melendez, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 3, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.txt
  • and received by SLD, as Messmer alleges. Persuasive evidence that the Commission or SLD received a communication could include a date-stamped postal return receipt. The proffered copy of the January 2, 2002 letter, without more, is insufficient to demonstrate that an appeal was timely filed. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, Messmer's Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.txt
  • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ERIE 2 BOCES's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the September 28, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. ERIE 2 BOCES subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because ERIE 2 BOCES's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.txt
  • Patrick School (St. Patrick), White Lake, Michigan. St. Patrick seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 12, 2002. The Commission received St. Patrick's Request for Review on June 5, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.txt
  • 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed May 22, 2002, by Weyauwega-Fremont High School, Weyauwega, Wisconsin, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gerald Pardun, Weyauwega-Fremont High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 22, 2002 (Waiver Request). The Funding Year 2001 deadline was established in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). In prior years, this funding period was referred to as Funding Year 4. Funding periods are now described by the year in which the funding period starts. Thus the funding period which begins on July 1, 2001 and ends on June 30, 2002, previously known as Funding Year 4, is now called
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.txt
  • to Fedex for overnight delivery. SLD did not receive Alameda's appeal until June 1, 2001. In its June 6, 2001 Administrator's Decision on Appeal, SLD denied Alameda's appeal because SLD received it more than 30 days after the April 24, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Alameda subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, appeals seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Requests for review are considered filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.txt
  • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Barbara Mulholland, Closter Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 21, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Barbara Mulholland, Closter Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 17, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.txt
  • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Paul Hill, Sheldon Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 25, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Paul Hill, Sheldon Independent School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 20, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.txt
  • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tammy Grissom, Tennessee School Boards Association, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 11, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Tammy Grissom, Tennessee School Boards Association, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 10, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.txt
  • have filed its FCC Form 470 without a completed signature. On October 1, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Alisal Union's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Alisal Union subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.txt
  • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 681406. On November 5, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider All Saints' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. All Saints' subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.txt
  • 2001, Dixon filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 498820. On November 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Dixon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dixon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.txt
  • decision to deny FRNs 643497, 644879, 645169, and 646519. On November 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider East Central's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the September 14, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. East Central subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.txt
  • the first Administrator's Decision on Appeal except that the date of issuance of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was stated to be October 13, 2000 instead of October 23, 2000. Marysville again filed a Request for Review with the Commission, asserting that October 23, 2000 is the date on which the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was actually issued. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Laurence Mala, Our Lady Queen of Peace School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 20, 2001. See Letter from Laurence Mala, Our Lady Queen of Peace School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 16, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.txt
  • discounted services. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Strathmore's appeal with respect to the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letters because it was received more than 30 days after these Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Strathmore subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.txt
  • SLD's decision to deny FRNs 633360, 633524, 633598, and 633686. On November 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Westport Edison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Westport Edison subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.txt
  • 2001, Wheeler filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 547827. On November 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Wheeler's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Wheeler subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Inland Lakes' appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the November 16, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Inland Lakes subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Inland Lakes' Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.txt
  • G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Heinemann, Illinois School for the Deaf, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 9, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Mary Heinemann, Illinois School for the Deaf, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 9, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jumoke Charter's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the March 15, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jumoke Charter subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Jumoke Charter's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.txt
  • Bureau: introduction This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by International Telcom, Ltd. (International Telcom). International Telcom seeks review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on June 27, 2001. The Commission received International Telcom's Request for Review on November 6, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of the decision the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.txt
  • December 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider St. Elizabeth's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 26, 2001 Postcard was issued. St. Elizabeth subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Baltimore Academy's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the February 8, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Baltimore Academy subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because Baltimore Academy's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Brandon's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the March 15, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Brandon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Graydon Manor's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the March 15, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Graydon Manor subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from C.W. Caligan, Hardee County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 22, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from C. W. Caligan, Hardee County School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 18, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.txt
  • October 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Round Lake's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Round Lake subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.txt
  • Ottawa Public Schools (West Ottawa), Holland, Michigan. West Ottawa seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 1, 2002. The Commission received West Ottawa's Request for Review on July 1, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.txt
  • decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 18, 2001 canceling Funding Request Number (FRN) 295852. Specifically, Wilcox requests that the deadline for invoices be extended. The Commission received Wilcox's Request for Review on September 18, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.txt
  • Park Union Free School District (Deer Park). Deer Park seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on December 17, 2001. The Commission received Deer Park's Request for Review on May 22, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.txt
  • Request for Review filed by Hastings-On-Hudson UFSD (Hastings), Hastings-On-Hudson, New York. Hastings seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on January 2, 2001. The Commission received Hastings's Request for Review on May 30, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.txt
  • Decision Letters. Virginia DOE's request for review of the rejection of these applications is therefore moot, and we dismiss the Request for Review in connection with these applications accordingly. We find that Virginia DOE's Request for Review is untimely with regard to most of the remaining applications. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.txt
  • to deny discounts for application SLD-226039. It contends that it mailed the FCC Form 470 certification in the same envelope as the certification for FCC Form 470 No. 8353. As an initial matter, we dismiss as untimely Weathersfield's Request for Review as it relates to application SLD-226039. For requests for review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.txt
  • Elementary School District (Arcata Elementary), Arcata, California. Arcata Elementary seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Arcata Elementary's Request for Review on August 31, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.txt
  • Area Public Library (Chatham Area), Chatham, Illinois. Chatham Area seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Chatham Area's Request for Review on September 9, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.txt
  • County Public Schools (Kent County), Chestertown, Maryland. Kent County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Kent County's Request for Review on September 3, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.txt
  • County School District (Bullitt County), Shepherdsville, Kentucky. Bullitt County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 29, 2002. The Commission received Bullitt County's Request for Review on May 31, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.txt
  • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Chicago Public Schools' appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the April 24, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Chicago Public Schools subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Chicago Public Schools' Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.txt
  • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jewish Educational Center's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the April 24, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jewish Educational Center subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Jewish Educational Center's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.txt
  • 2001, Johnson filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 515177. On October 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Johnson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Johnson subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Homer-Center's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the April 24, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Homer-Center subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Because Homer-Center's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.txt
  • the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Waiver Request on May 8, 2002. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.txt
  • (Administrator) on March 7, 2000, or, in the alternative, waiver of the Funding Year 2000 filing deadline. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the Request for Review and deny the Request for Waiver. The Commission received Lincoln County's Request for Review on April 30, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.txt
  • 2002 time frame. Persuasive evidence that the Commission or SLD received a communication could include a postmarked, certified, or registered mail receipt. The proffered copy of the March 25, 2002 letter, without more, is insufficient to demonstrate that an appeal was timely filed with SLD. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Varisco-Rogers Charter's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.txt
  • and Sentinel did not meet Funding Year 2001 minimum processing standards because they had used the incorrect OMB-approved FCC Form 471 that was dated October 2000 in the lower-right hand corner of the form. On December 20, 2001, Sentinel and Paloma filed the instant Requests for Review. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.txt
  • Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on December 28, 2001 and March 6, 2002. The Commission received Pajaro Valley's Requests for Review and Waiver on February 28 and May 6, 2002, respectively. For the reasons set forth below, we deny both requests. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Requests for Review and Waiver were not filed within the requisite 60-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Yeshivat's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the April 19, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Yeshivat subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Yeshivat's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Aura Alfaro, Escuela Manuel Corchado, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 11, 2002 (Request for Review). Electronic Mail from Aura Alfaro, Escuela Manuel Corchado, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 8, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.txt
  • for Review filed by Akron-Fairgrove Schools (Akron-Fairgrove), Fairgrove, Michigan. Akron-Fairgrove seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 1, 2002. The Commission received Akron-Fairgrove's Request for Review on October 2, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.txt
  • City Public Schools (Alexandria City), Alexandria, Virginia. Alexandria City seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Alexandria City's Request for Review on September 18, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Aurora Weier's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the August 31, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Aurora Weier subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Because Aurora Weier's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bayliss' appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the May 7, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bayliss subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Bayliss's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.txt
  • from Pete Cote, Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District (SLD Application No. 316961), to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 18, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review); Letter from Pete Cote, Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District (SLD Application No. 321149), to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 18, 2002. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.txt
  • G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tobin A. Mitchell, South Cook Educational Consortium, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 11, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Tobin A. Mitchell, South Cook Educational Consortium, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 11, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.txt
  • Union High School District (Sweetwater), Chula Vista, California. Sweetwater seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on April 25, 2002. The Commission received Sweetwater SD's Request for Review on June 27, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.txt
  • (Healy Public Schools), Healy, Kansas. Healy Public Schools seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Healy Public Schools' Request for Review on October 16, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.txt
  • Inc., File No. 145224, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15157, n.2 (Com. Car. Bur. 2000); Juan Galiano, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6442, 6443 (1990) (``[I]f the Commission were to entertain and accept unsupported arguments that letters mailed in Commission proceedings were not delivered... procedural havoc and abuse would result.''). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 01-376 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 28,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Blessed Sacrament's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the June 17, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Blessed Sacrament subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because Blessed Sacrament's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.txt
  • School Department (Portsmouth School), Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Portsmouth School seeks review of three decisions issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 13, 2002. The Commission received Portsmouth School's Request for Review on October 16, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joni Wilson, Gentry Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 4, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Joni Wilson, Gentry Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 13, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.txt
  • 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that Talmud Torah's appeal was received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued and was therefore untimely. Talmud Torah subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued by SLD on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or the Administrator within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed only upon receipt. Based on the record, we find that Talmud Torah timely filed the Appeal to SLD. The record demonstrates that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gilda E. Stanbery-Cotney, Peach Public Libraries, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 24, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Gilda E. Stanbery-Cotney, Peach Public Libraries, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 21, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.txt
  • Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Darren W. Anglin, St. Clair County Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 17, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Darren W. Anglin, St. Clair County Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated September 12, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.txt
  • Request for Review as untimely. Chawanakee asserts that the request for review is timely under Commission regulations and the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Petition for Reconsideration. At issue is SLD's final decision on Chawanakee's Funding Year 2001 application for discounts, which SLD issued on August 6, 2001. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules requires requests for review of all Administrator decisions to be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision. Chawanakee did not file its Request for Review with the Commission until 31 days after the issuance of SLD's decision, but argued that the request for review was timely because Chawanakee's arguments rested on the legal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.txt
  • Valley Public Library (Grand Valley), Orwell, Ohio. Grand Valley seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 2, 2002. The Commission received Grand Valley's Request for Review on October 17, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.txt
  • of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Oklahoma City Public Schools, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Supplemental Filing, filed December 5, 2001 (Supplemental Filing). However, because the Supplemental Filing was submitted after the expiration of the 30-day period established by the Commission's rules for requests for review, we do not further consider it. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Request for Review. See, supra, para. 3. See SouthWest Ohio Computer Association Order, para. 10; Request for Review by Genesee Intermediate School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-151960, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 11820, paras. 8-9 (Com. Car.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.txt
  • issued six Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letters indicating that it would not consider Winnebago's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 20, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Winnebago subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. SLD misapplied the rule in its Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letters. We find the applicant complied with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.txt
  • School District 877 (Buffalo School), Buffalo, Minnesota. Buffalo School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 29, 2002. The Commission received Buffalo School's Request for Waiver on October 29, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Waiver was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.txt
  • Waiver filed by Petersburg Public Library (Petersburg), Petersburg, Virginia. Petersburg seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 29, 2002. The Commission received Petersburg's Request for Waiver on October 24, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Waiver was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.txt
  • Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Mary High School's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the May 7, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Mary High School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the St. Mary High School's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.txt
  • filed by Sullins Academy (Sullins), Bristol, Virginia. Sullins seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator or USAC) on June 24, 2002. The Commission received Sullins' Request for Review on October 3, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.txt
  • 12, 2002. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue a Pink Postcard on July 17, 2001. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3290A1.txt
  • Portsmouth School sought review of three decisions issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 13, 2002. In the Portsmouth Order, the Division found that Commission received Portsmouth School's Request for Review on October 16, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the record indicated that the Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.txt
  • Public School (Wayne County), Goldsboro, North Carolina. Wayne County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 8, 2002. The Commission received Wayne County's Request for Review on September 26, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.txt
  • 5, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Addison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Addison subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.txt
  • issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeals indicating that it would not consider Granger's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the July 23 and August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Granger subsequently filed the instant Requests for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.txt
  • 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mulberry's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mulberry subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.txt
  • August 26, 2002, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Horizon's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Horizon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the St. Lucy School's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.txt
  • St. Bernadette School (St. Bernadette), Seattle, Washington. St. Bernadette seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received St. Bernadette's Request for Review on September 18, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Francis Xavier's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Francis Xavier subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.txt
  • County School District (Kanawha County), Cleveland, Ohio. Kanawha County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on September 25, 2002. The Commission received Kanawha County's Request for Waiver on November 26, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mescalero's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 1, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mescalero subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, Mescalero's Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Midlothian Independent's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the June 3, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Midlothian Independent subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Midlothian Independent's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Melrose Area's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Melrose Area subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.txt
  • Sheet. The Letter Re-Order Advisory Cover Sheet notes that all terms, conditions, dates and/or actions imposed by the Schools and Libraries Program on applicants or service providers that are dependent on the specific dates in effect with the original letter remain unchanged, including deadlines for filing appeals. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.txt
  • November 5, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider East Alton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. East Alton subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.txt
  • filed by Huntington Union Free School District (Huntington), Huntington, New York. Huntington seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 23, 2001. The Commission received Huntington's Request for Review on November 27, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.txt
  • not have rejected the application for failure to satisfy the minimum processing standards. On March 26, 2001, E-Rate Central submitted the pending Request for Review, seeking review and reversal of the minimum processing standards rejection of St. Patrick's application under the analysis followed in the Naperville Order. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any party seeking review of a decision issued by the Administrator must file its request with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider West Harrison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. West Harrison subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.txt
  • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Moody, Hanna Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Robert Moody, Hanna Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 28, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.txt
  • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kim Gray, Municipal Telephone Exchange, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 22, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Kim Gray, Municipal Telephone Exchange, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 22, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 14, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Richard J. Malfatti, Somis Union School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 30, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Richard J. Malfatti, Somis Union School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 30, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.txt
  • 54.719(c). We note that Floyd County filed a simultaneous appeal to the Administrator of the decision in Application No. 275627. See Letter from Jerry Gatlin, Floyd County Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 2, 2001. The Commission's regulations do not contemplate simultaneous appeals to the Commission and the Administrator. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Therefore, we would ordinarily dismiss this appeal without prejudice to file a new appeal once the Administrator had rendered a decision. However, because we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.txt
  • (specifying ACD of January 17, 2000). FCC Form 470, Oakland Unified School District, USCN 521140000122212, filed January 14, 1999 (specifying ACD of February 22, 1999). Request for Review, at 1. Request for Review, at 1-2, Attachment (Letter from Robert Cambell, Pacific Bell, to George McDonald, Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated October 26, 2001). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Request for Review by Children's Home Society, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-183026, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-2795, para. 8 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. December 4, 2001). 02-750 02-750 . / I J � t � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.txt
  • Request for Review filed by Elgin Public Library (Elgin), Elgin, Iowa. Elgin seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on April 29, 1999. The Commission received Elgin's Request for Review on October 2, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Lancaster Area's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lancaster Area subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.txt
  • G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 27, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 7, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.txt
  • WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gitty Horowitz, Bnois Spinka, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 24, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Gitty Horowitz, Bnois Spinka, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 28, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.txt
  • Floyd County Board of Education (Floyd County), Rome, Georgia. Floyd County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on November 17, 2000. The Commission received Floyd County's Request for Review on February 26, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.txt
  • 1, 2002, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Haywood's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Haywood subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jody Bell, Rochester Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 4, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Jody Bell, Rochester Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated November 5, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Saint Michael's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the September 4, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Saint Michael subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be remanded
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.txt
  • G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ann Gissal, School District of Wisconsin Dells, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 25, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Ann Gissal, School District of Wisconsin Dells, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 15, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Deegan, St. Jude School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Michael Deegan, St. Jude School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 5, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.txt
  • February 11, 2002, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Kings Local's appeals because they were received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Kings Local subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.txt
  • GTE Service Corp. v. FCC, 121 S. Ct. 423 (November 2, 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(b), (c); Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, OMB 3060-0806 (December 1998) (FCC Form 471). 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(g). >. > (Minimum Processing Standards). Minimum Processing Standards. Minimum Processing Standards. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Due to recent disruptions in the reliability of the mail service, the appeal period has been extended to 60 days for Requests for Review seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001. See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 01-376
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Mirrer Yeshiva's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mirrer Yeshiva subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Paso Robles's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 26, 2001 FCC Form 471 Certification Rejection Letter was issued. Paso Robles subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.txt
  • Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Our Lady of Lourdes's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Our Lady of Lourdes subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.txt
  • 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ubly's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the September 14, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ubly subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the 30-day period has been extended by an additional 30 days for requests for review, Ubly's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider West Branch's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. West Branch subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.txt
  • 28, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Gloversville's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gloversville subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.txt
  • Governor's School), Hartsville, South Carolina. S.C. Governor's School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on November 7, 2001. The Commission received S.C. Governor's School's Request for Review on January 8, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.txt
  • the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Gary Habeeb, Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 26, 2002; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Gary Habeeb, Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District, dated January 21, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.txt
  • behalf of Remer School District No. 118, Remer, Minnesota. Northland seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 17, 2001. The Commission received Northland's Request for Review on December 31, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider St. Norbert's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Norbert subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.txt
  • issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. John's Prep's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. John's Prep subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.txt
  • Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Chelsea School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 27, 2001 Funding Year 2001 FCC Form 471 Rejection Letter was issued. Chelsea School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Apostles School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the May 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Apostles School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.txt
  • Calhoun states that it did not file an appeal within 30 days of the FCDL because the FCDL did not grant or deny FRN 654354, and because Calhoun was informed that it should wait for a second FCDL to arrive. For appeals to SLD or to the Commission seeking review of SLD decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, the appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. For decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, requests for review must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Apostles School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Apostles School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the SLD or the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Washington County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Washington County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Granger School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Granger School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from LuAnn Hayden, School District of Durand, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 22, 2003 (Request for Review); Postcard from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Chuck Kukura, School District of Durand, dated March 29, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sheila Musselman, Clifton High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 25, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Sheila Musselman, Clifton High School, dated January 21, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ryan Martin, Gardner Unified School District 231, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 12, 2002 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company to Doug Berg, Gardner Unified School District 231, dated August 26, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.txt
  • Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Wayne Azon, Genoa-Kingston Community Unit School District 424, dated January 27, 2003 (regarding SLD Application Number 327932) and Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Curt Gustafson, Genoa-Kingston Community Unit School District 424, dated March 4, 2003 (regarding SLD Application Number 247609). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Becca Carsel, Lucia Mar Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 16, 2003 (Request for Review); Letters from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jon Hitchen, Lucia Mar Unified School District, dated January 22, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Spires, Riverside County Office of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 3, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to William Spires, Riverside County Office of Education, dated December 16, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.txt
  • School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 17, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Michael Esolda, Woodbridge Township School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 17, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1579 ! . / 0 1 3 4 1 2 3 4 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.txt
  • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nechama Green, Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 26, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rabbi Jacob Krouse, Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn, dated January 21, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.txt
  • Grainfield City Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 18, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Anna Whiteman, Grainfield City Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 17, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1885 h"9 � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.txt
  • to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 31, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Paula Magnus, Northside Center for Child Development, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 28, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1921 # 0 1 2 3 5 3 4 5 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.txt
  • June, 1999. Shortly thereafter, SLD issued a decision in each of the affected applications, addressed to the applicant, not GCI, in which SLD dismissed the SLD Appeal as untimely because it was filed more than 30 days after the issuance of the relevant Funding Commitment Decision Letter. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. On January 11, 2001, having received no notice of the outcome of its appeal, GCI inquired with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.txt
  • Ahead Communications Systems, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 14, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Theresa DeNuzzo, Ahead Communications Systems, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 11, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1946 ( ) * + - � + , - �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.txt
  • regarding SLD Application Number 344224; Letter from Sandy Nelson, Federal Way Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 13, 2003, regarding SLD Application Number 344236; Letter from Sandy Nelson, Federal Way Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 13, 2003, regarding SLD Application Number 344279. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1947 � � � � � � � htm htm � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Georgia Morrow, E-Rate Consulting, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 10, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Johanna Whitley, Anderson County School District, dated April 10, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Alvin Hord, Blount County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 29, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Alvin Hord, Blount County Schools, dated March 27, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Raymond Caplinger, Colorado Springs School District 11, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 25, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Raymond Caplinger, Colorado Springs School District 11, dated April 22, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.txt
  • Linden Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 29, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Frank Taranto, Linden Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 29, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2290 � (R) � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr. Reginald Mayo, New Haven Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Reginald Mayo, New Haven Public Schools, dated December 20, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.txt
  • District 234, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 5, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Kevin Lancaster, Bliss School District 234, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 3, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2433 � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.txt
  • School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 12, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Isabelle Harrington, Iditarod Area School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 13, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2434 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Monty Brown, Unified School District No. 507, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 10, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Monty Brown, Unified School District No. 507, dated April 7, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.txt
  • the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Franklin Fenton, Baldwin Park Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 31, 2002; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Franklin Fenton, Baldwin Park Unified School District, dated June 3, 2002. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.txt
  • June 2, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Melanie Reppond, CenturyTel, Inc., dated September 21, 2001. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.txt
  • Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 6, 2003. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Ryan Sicard, School District of Somerset, dated August 6, 2002 and Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jan Carlson, School District of Somerset, dated February 13, 2003 (Administrator's Decisions on Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.txt
  • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). See Letter from Carol J. Veitch, Mifflin County Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 4, 2001; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Carol J. Veitch, Mifflin County Library, dated October 31, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Id. Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). In re Mary Ann Salvatiello, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4705, 4707-8, para. 22 (1991) (citing Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond, 497 US 1046 (1990)). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2583 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2583
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.txt
  • Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Sister Judine Hilbing, Saint Michael School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 27, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Sister Judine Hilbing, Saint Michael School, dated March 4, 2003. Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.txt
  • Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan G. Gauch, Bemus Point Central School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Susan G. Gauch, Bemus Point School District, dated November 9, 2001; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.txt
  • Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeffrey Lorentz, Galena Park Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 27, 2003 (Request for Waiver). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules states that the Commission may waive its rules on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefore is shown. 47 C.F. R. �1.3. �54.720(b). Letter from Shirley Neeley, Galena Park Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 24, 2003 (Request for Review). See also Request for Waiver by Alpine County Unified School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. NEC. 471,01-24-00.5400170, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order 17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.txt
  • seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Janis Benson, Charlyn Bruchmiller, and Max Gordon, Brady Independent School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 5, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Janis Benson, Brady Independent School District, dated May 6, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.txt
  • Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 8, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Ralph Rich, W. T. Rich Company, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 8, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2965 ! 9 : O R e r s t u v u
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michelle Chemotti, Thomas Communications & Technology, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 3, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Michelle Chemotti, Thomas Communications & Technology, dated June 25, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2966 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2966 1 < A B G � ` tm � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.txt
  • Educational Computing Solutions, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 5, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Kermit Lattimore, Educational Computing Solutions, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 5, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2967 $ % & ' ) � ' ( ) �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.txt
  • June 19, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Melanie Reppond, CenturyTel, Inc., dated September 21, 2001. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Ann Dowling, Edwin Gould Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 17, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Mary Ann Dowling, Edwin Gould Academy, dated April 14, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2969 � / 1 ? A I Y ^ e � � � � � � � � � Y _
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Bill Swartzmiller, North Central Ohio Computer Cooperative, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 14, 2003; Letters from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bill Swartzmiller, North Central Ohio Computer Cooperative, dated February 22, 2003, regarding SLD Application Numbers 226381, 248224, 250882, 257003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Blessed Sacrament's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the June 3, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Blessed Sacrament subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Blessed Sacrament's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Lamb, Clovis Municipal Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 27, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Michael Lamb, Clovis Municipal Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 7, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.txt
  • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Elia Hernandez, Father Yermo High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 4, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Elia Hernandez, Father Yermo High School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 2, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.txt
  • Letter from Rhoda Young, Dickey LaMoure Multidistrict Special Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 12, 2002. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rhoda Young, Dickey LaMoure Multidistrict Special Education, dated June 24, 2002. Id. See Request for Review. Id. Id. See Dickey LaMoure Form 471. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lori McClenathan, HLV Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 25, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from William A. Lynch, HLV Community School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 28, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.txt
  • Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Hazelton, Memphis City School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 27, 2003 (Request for Review); Funding Commitment Decision Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bill Hazelton, Memphis City School District, dated March 24, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.txt
  • School District (Kershaw County), Camden, South Carolina. Kershaw County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on September 30, 2002. The Commission received Kershaw County's Request for Review on December 6, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.txt
  • 22, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Corbin Witt, Atchison Public Schools, dated January 21, 2003. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3630 ' $ 4 9 G a q � ' `` - 4 q ' 4 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Glenda Pate, Cedar County Library District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 25, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Glenda Pate, Cedar County Library District, dated June 9, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.txt
  • 54.719(c). See Letter from Sister Elizabeth Dalessio, Monmouth Ocean Educational Services Commission, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 24, 2003; Letters from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Sister Elizabeth Dalessio, Monmouth Ocean Educational Services Commission, dated June 30, 2003, regarding SLD Application Numbers 307404, 321280, 321541, and 323561. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.txt
  • may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Garvin Burton, West Harvey-Dixmoor Public School District #147, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 6, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Garvin Burton, West Harvey-Dixmoor Public School District #147, dated June 10, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3681 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3681 * . q u (c) � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.txt
  • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Patrick School's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the May 7, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Patrick School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the St. Patrick School's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-381A1.txt
  • SLD's unreasonable delay in responding to Queen of Apostles' request for a copy of a missing page from the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. In this Order, we affirm our prior decision, but seek to clarify the reasoning set forth in the Queen of Apostles' Order. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Accordingly, appeals of funding commitments must be filed within 30 days of the date of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.txt
  • School District 493 (Columbus Unified), Lawrence, Kansas. Columbus Unified seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 21, 2002. The Commission received Columbus Unified's Request for Review on December 2, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Eastchester's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 30, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Eastchester subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Eastchester's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Huron ISD's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 16, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Huron ISD subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Huron ISD's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.txt
  • Mary-St. Casimir School (Immaculate Heart), Lansing, Michigan. Immaculate Heart seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on June 17, 2002. The Commission received Immaculate Heart's Request for Review on September 17, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.txt
  • St. Joseph University Heights (St. Joseph), Buffalo, New York. St. Joseph seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 23, 2001. The Commission received St. Joseph's Request for Review on October 28, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.txt
  • St. Lucy School, Newark, New Jersey. St. Lucy School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 27, 2002. The Commission received St. Lucy's Request for Review on October 30, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.txt
  • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Stafford Municipal's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 1, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Stafford Municipal subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, Stafford Municipal's Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.txt
  • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Stanfield Elementary's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the March 22, 2001 Fund Year 4 Form 471 - Rejection Letter was issued. Stanfield Elementary subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.txt
  • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Welch's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the September 9, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Welch subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Welch's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.txt
  • Dubuque Community Schools (Dubuque Community), Dubuque, Iowa. Dubuque Community seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on April 23, 2002. The Commission received Dubuque Community's Request for Review on July 30, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.txt
  • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Mayes, Huron Intermediate School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 19, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from William Mayes, Huron Intermediate School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 22, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.txt
  • filed by the Spurwink School, Portland, Maine. Spurwink School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 15, 2002. The Commission received Spurwink School's Request for Review on November 5, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.txt
  • Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Greg Whaley and Brian Mitchell, Fair Play R-2 School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2003 (Request for Review). Letter from Greg Whaley and Brian Mitchell, Fair Play R-2 School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 19, 2003 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.txt
  • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Norman Hughes, Glades County School Board, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 29, 2003 (Request for Review). Letter from Wayne Aldrich, Glades County School Board, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed November 27, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.txt
  • Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jessica Edmiston, Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 13, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jessica Edmiston, Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, dated December 10, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary McNeal, Glen Mills Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 24, 2003 (Request for Waiver). Letter from Mary McNeal, Glen Mills Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 14, 2003 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.txt
  • Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Futty, Julie Keesling, and Frederick Schmitt, Norfolk Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 24, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Dennis Futty, Julie Keesling, and Frederick Schmitt, Norfolk Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 23, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.txt
  • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jann Cohen, Ventnor Educational Community Complex, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 30, 2003 (Request for Review); Postcards from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Penny Margolis, Ventnor Educational Community Complex, dated March 29, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.txt
  • Department, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 7, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Lillian Brooks, City of Espanola Finance Department, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 22, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-108 - � � � " � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.txt
  • 2, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 21, 2003 (Request for Waiver). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Dennis Thompson, Hampton County School District 2, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 24, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-109 � ^ d n x } ~ � � � 8� "
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.txt
  • District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 12, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Julie April, Murrieta Valley Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 5, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-111 tm � (c) � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.txt
  • March 26, 2003, Letter from Elizabeth Egan, Gloucester City Library, filed March 22, 2004, and Letter from Deborah Cline, North Penn School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 13, 2003 (Requests for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a)-(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.txt
  • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Daniel Nakamoto, North American Family Institute, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 3, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Daniel Nakamoto, North American Family Institute, dated March 5, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Waiver at 3. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.txt
  • the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Jim Utley, School Board of Alachua County, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 19, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jim Utley, School Board of Alachua County, dated May 22, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.txt
  • School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 17, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Nancy Collins, Saint Catherine of Genoa School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 16, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-114 � z � � � � ` � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.txt
  • School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 31, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Barb Landon, Tunkhannock Area School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 30, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-115 � ` - - � � � � � � � 6�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.txt
  • Rcd 5091, para. 4 (Com. Car. Bur. 2002). . Request for Review by New Hartford Central School District, Federal Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-007628, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 19329, para. 6 (Com. Car. Bur. 2001). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 04-1253 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1253 > � � � � � = > � " � � � � � � 0 � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.txt
  • December 10, 2003, filed December 18, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Carla Porter, Holyoke School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated September 22, 2003, filed September 25, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1842 � ( ( - 1 3 8 9 > n o {
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). See Request for Review. Normally, such appeals must be filed with the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of the decision the party seeks to have reviewed. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). However, due to disruption in the reliability of the mail service, the 30-day appeal period has been extended by an additional 30 days for requests for review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001. See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (2001). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.txt
  • by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Renee Sanders, Allendale County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, postmarked September 25, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Renee Sanders, Allendale County Schools, dated March 5, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-2485 (R) � % ) ] k l o � � (R) � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.txt
  • by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Ronald MacClay, Dunellen School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 17, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Ronald MacClay, Dunellen School District, dated July 21, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Waiver at 4. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.txt
  • School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 17, 2004; Letter from Shan Williams, Genesis School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 16, 2004; Letter from Sheryl Timm, Lutheran High School of St. Charles County, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 8, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-2999 � ( , ", - 6 7 8 ? @ E L
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.txt
  • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Peter Hutcher, Oakland Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 23, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Peter Hutcher, Oakland Unified School District, dated June 2, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). See Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.txt
  • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3560 * + 7 8 � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.txt
  • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3561 � % & , 1 8 9 : = A K M X { � � - h !- � � � � - � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.txt
  • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3562 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3562 � � � � � � (� � � � � � � � � � � � y � � � y �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.txt
  • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). On-Public Internal use Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3563 � . / 4 ; B \ l ... � � / l � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.txt
  • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.txt
  • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3565 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3565 � 8 ? F M d � � Q c h t v � � � � � � � � � � � � � � q �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.txt
  • Baraga Area Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 24, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Lynn Ketola, Baraga Area Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 23, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Non-Public Internal use Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3566 A H Q Z ` b e
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.txt
  • Decatur Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 21, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Mike Parrish, Decatur Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 20, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Non-Public Internal use Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3567 O V _ k q s v
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.txt
  • Eduardo Delgado, Guamani School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 23, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Eduardo Delgado, Guamani School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 16, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3568 j q z � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.txt
  • Nancy Pierce, Blackstone Public Library, dated May 1, 2003 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Nancy Pierce, Blackstone Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 22, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-367 � E I m s } � � � `` � � � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.txt
  • Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 15, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from John Armano, Monroe Township Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 13, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-369 " � � � � � 5� � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.txt
  • School District, on August 25, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau (Paramus Order). See Paramus Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 19515, para. 1. Under the Commission's rules, requests for review of SLD decisions must be filed within 60 days of the SLD decision date. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See also Letter from Michelle Chemotti, Thomas Communications & Technology, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 25, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company, to Michelle Chemotti, Thomas Communications & Technology, dated June 25, 2003 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See Petition for Reconsideration at 1. See Administrator's Decision on Appeal.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.txt
  • FLORENCE TELEPHONE COMPANY CONCERNING A DECISION OF THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR TO SUSPEND ITS HIGH-COST UNIVERSAL SERVICE PAYMENTS CC Docket No. 96-45 Release Date: December 17, 2004 Comment Date: January 7, 2005 Reply Comment Date: January 18, 2005 The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on an appeal filed by New Florence Telephone Company (New Florence), pursuant to sections 54.719(c) and 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, of a November 5, 2004 decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) that suspends and withholds high-cost support payments to New Florence. Among other things, New Florence contends that suspension of high-cost support violates its due process and property rights, and restricts the ability of New Florence to provide telecommunications service to its customers.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.txt
  • Heritage Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 5, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Connie Bongiorni, Heritage Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 4, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-406 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-406 j t y z  - �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.txt
  • School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Allison Cioffi, Maricopa County School Superintendent's Office, dated June 30, 2003 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letter). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Letter from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.txt
  • Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Yitzchok Kaplan, Beth Jacob High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 26, 2002 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Yitzchok Kaplan, Beth Jacob High School, dated October 21, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See in the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-428 3 (c) 7 < J K P ^ x � � (c) � =3 4 5 6 7 K � (c) 3 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.txt
  • by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from J.M. Swatzell, Sunnyside School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 27, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to J.M. Swatzell, Sunnyside School District, dated March 4, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.txt
  • Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 4, 2003. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Maureen Davidson, Albuquerque Public Schools, dated June 13, 2003. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to George Castorena, Albuquerque Public Schools, dated January 21, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.txt
  • Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jesse W. Jackson, Jesse Jackson Academy, Houston, Texas, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 29, 2003 (Request for Review); Funding Commitment Decision Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Artie Jackson, Jesse Jackson Academy, Houston, Texas, dated October 6, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.txt
  • for Review); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Theresa Mangold, St. Bartholomew Consolidated School, dated June 17, 2002. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See also In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). See Request for Review. 04-599 04-599 X $ W X Y Z f � � � � � X �X� 6 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.txt
  • 27, 2002 (Request for Administrator's Review). See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bruce Kalter, Donna Public Library, dated October 1, 2002 (regarding SLD application number 320003); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bruce Kalter, Donna Public Library, dated October 1, 2002 (regarding SLD application number 324627). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.txt
  • seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Jim Chapman, Grant Joint Union High School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 12, 2003. Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jim Chapman, Grant Joint Union High School District, dated May 14, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.txt
  • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Virginia Crow, Murchison Independent School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 20, 2002; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Virginia Crow, Murchison Independent School District, dated January 31, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.txt
  • December 19, 2003, filed December 24, 2003 (Request for Waiver). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from James Reny, Waterville Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated December 19, 2003, filed December 22, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-985 � " , 1 6 7 < = B n o {
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.txt
  • No. 02-6, filed January 24, 2005 (Petition for Waiver). Request for Review of Iroquois West School District 10, Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File No. SLD-343292, CC Docket 02-6, Order, DA 05-54, released January 11, 2005 (Iroquois Order). Petition for Waiver at 4, Appendix B (104 applicants from Pennsylvania and 14 applicants from South Dakota). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Letter from Daniel Farslow, Ohio State E-Rate Coordinator, dated January 28, 2005. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See, e.g., Request for Waiver by Stephen-Argyle Central School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Finch, Battenkill Valley Supervisory Union, to Federal Communications Commission, dated February 3, 2005 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). The Request for Review was dated 169 days after the decision it appeals. In the Request for Review, Arlington School District states that a January 2005 e-mail from SLD gave it the option of filing an appeal with SLD or the FCC. See Request for Review at 1. We conclude, however, that the e-mail was merely responding to an inquiry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tomi J. Selby, Information Transport Solutions, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, dated November 5, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). The appeal to SLD was dated 100 days after the decision it appealed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Allen Damren, School Administrative Unit #6, to Federal Communications Commission, dated November 26, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). The Request for Review was dated 191 days after the decision it appeals. Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1128 h# - . 1 N O j p � � � - " � � � � � � ` ' � � � " � � �� #  � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.txt
  • contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400. -FCC- See, e.g., Connect2 Internet Network, Inc., Request for Review, CC Docket No. 02-06, filed December 13, 2004, at 2. See, e.g., Connect2 Internet Network, Inc., Consolidated Request for Review and Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 02-06, December 27, 2004, at 1-2. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 & C ] p q s � � � � � � � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.txt
  • Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Lawrence Hill, Athens Independent School District, dated October 26, 2004; Letter from Andy Winick, Novacon, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 27, 2004; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Andy Winick, Novacon, dated October 15, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-161 � � � � � � � � � � � � � T � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.txt
  • TELEPHONE COMPANY CONCERNING A DECISION OF THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR TO SUSPEND ITS HIGH-COST UNIVERSAL SERVICE PAYMENTS CC Docket No. 96-45 Release Date: February 2, 2005 Comment Date: February 23, 2005 Reply Comment Date: March 7, 2005 The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on an appeal filed by Cass County Telephone Company (Cass County Telephone), pursuant to sections 54.719(c) and 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, of a November 5, 2004 decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) suspending and withholding high-cost support payments to Cass County Telephone. Among other things, Cass County Telephone contends that suspension of high-cost support violates its procedural and substantive due process rights, and restricts the ability of Cass County Telephone to provide telecommunications service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.txt
  • from Theodore Hamilton, ONEC, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 2, 2004 (Request for Review). Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bryon Wilcox, ONEC, dated March 3, 2004. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras.55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.txt
  • Smith, Hyde Leadership Public Charter School, Washington, DC, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 4, 2004; Letter from Kara Skarlupka, Sacred Heart School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 30, 2004 (Requests for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a)-(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.txt
  • to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 7, 2004 (Request for Review). Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Roger Bordeaux, Tiospa Zina Tribal School, dated September 24, 2004. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-462 � h h h ' ( ) * B U � � * . / A B F G N S T Z t � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.txt
  • School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 21, 2003; and Letter from Stephen Sinco, Interim Business Manager for Woodbridge Board of Education, concerning Woodbridge School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 4, 2003. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-465 � 3 M N O P V c d "d e k p q x y ` � � � � � � � � � � � d �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.txt
  • Commission, filed December 15, 2004 (Request for Review). See also Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Gary Wilz, Killdeer Public School District No. 16, dated October 26, 2004. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Letter from Gary Wilz, Killdeer Public School District No. 16, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 2, 2004; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jason Berg, Killdeer Public School District No. 16, dated April 27, 2004. Federal Communications Commission DA 05-466 � h = B I [ \ a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.txt
  • Narda M. Jones Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sandra Tiedt, Beaver Dam Community Hospital, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed January 21, 2005 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719-54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to the Commission's review of decisions by the Administrator). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-481 ( ? Z j q w z � - tm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.txt
  • Letter from Jeanene Barnett, Bristow Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 20, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Jeanene Barnett, Bristow Public Schools to Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 21, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-496 o p q r s � m s s w
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.txt
  • and 97-21, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 12069 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2002); Request for Review by South Barber Unified School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-158897, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 18435 (Com. Car. Bur. 2001). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See, e.g., Request for Waiver by Stephen-Argyle Central School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-228975, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.txt
  • procedures for Funding Year 2003 require that FCC Form 471 Block 6 certifications be postmarked no later than February 6, 2003, in order for the FCC Form 471 to be considered filed in a timely manner. See Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, FCC Form 471, OMB-3060-0806 (December 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See, e.g., Request for Waiver by Stephen-Argyle Central School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-228975, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.txt
  • no later than January 17, 2002, in order for the FCC Form 471 to be considered filed in a timely manner. See Request for Review by Our Lady of Victory Academy, Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File No. SLD-325743, CC Docket No. 06-6, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2389, 2390, para. 4 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2004). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See, e.g., Request for Waiver by Stephen-Argyle Central School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-228975, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.txt
  • Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from George Kunkel, Community Consolidated School District 168, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 2, 2004 See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to George Kunkel, Community Consolidated School District 168, dated May 11, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.txt
  • Science Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 22, 2004 (Request for Review). Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Ismet Isik, Harmony Science Academy, dated July 13, 2004. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.txt
  • Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-93 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-93 � t � - � � " � � � � � � � +� � � � � � � � � � � � � � I L � � � � � � � � ` � � � ` � � � � ` � `
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.txt
  • ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b), is WAIVED with regard to Requests for Review filed by Colegio Evangelico Capitan Correa, Colegio Jardin, Colegio Kiany, Guamani Private School, Southwestern Educational Society, and St. Francis School, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.txt
  • September 30 following the close of the applicable funding year, although that deadline may be extended if the applicant satisfies one of four criteria. Section 54.719 of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by a decision of any division of USAC may file an appeal with the relevant committee governing the division or directly with the Commission. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review by the Commission of funding decisions issued by USAC. For those requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001, the appeal must be filed with the Commission or USAC within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.txt
  • after the completion of Friendship House's competitive bidding process, however, it is not applicable for this Request for Review. We therefore look to the Tennessee Order for guidance. Appeal Deadline. Commission rules provide that any person aggrieved by a decision of USAC may file an appeal with the relevant Committee governing the USAC Division or directly with the Commission. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of funding decisions issued by USAC. For those requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001, the appeal must be filed with the Commission or USAC within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. The time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.txt
  • GRANTED, and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to the Administrator for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from Michael Pill, Special Counsel to the Greenfield Public School District, to Federal Communications Commission, dated October 12, 2005 (Waiver Request). Waiver Request at 2. Id. See also 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). SLD issued the funding commitment decision letters for Greenfield's applications on December 3, 2004. See Letters from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Scott Carbee, Greenfield Public School District, dated December 3, 2004 (Funding Commitment Decision Letters). Greenfield filed its appeal with SLD on July 21, 2005. See Letter from Carol S. Holzberg, Greenfield Public School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.txt
  • Association, Inc., Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 15 FCC Rcd 22975 (2001) (Commitment Adjustment Implementation Order) (the Commission established procedures for implementing commitment adjustment recovery actions). See Mastermind Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 4032-4033, para. 10 (concluding that a competitive bidding violation occurred despite the lack of a specific rule addressing the facts at issue). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F. 2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 07-1270 07-1270 p q � � h
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.txt
    • 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170, Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952, 24970, para. 29 (2002). Howe Affidavit at 1. Howe Affidavit at 2; see also, Administrator's Decision at 2. Howe Affidavit, Exh. B (Letter from USAC to Philip Abbenhaus, Big River Telephone Company, LLC, dated July 22, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. For purposes of 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, USAC's invoice is a decision by the Administrator. USAC prints instructions to this effect on the reverse side of each invoice sent to contributors, including information on how to dispute the charges contained on the invoice. Administrator's Decision at 1-2. Id. at 2. Request for Review at 1. Big River indicates that it
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
    • for Ruling under Section 253 of the Communications Act 06/30/09 3060-0862 Handling Confidential Information 06/30/08 3060-0863 Satellite Delivery of Network Signals to Unserved Households for Purposes of the Satellite Home Viewer Act (SHVA) 04/30/09 3060-0865 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Universal Licensing System Recordkeeping and Third-Party Disclosure Requirements 07/31/10 3060-0874 FCC 475B, FCC 2000 Series 09/30/10 3060-0876 Sec. 54.703 and Secs. 54.719, 54.720, 54.721, 54.722, 54.723, 54.724 and 54.725 09/30/09 3060-0881 Sec. 95.861 09/30/08 3060-0882 Sec. 95.833 01/31/09 3060-0888 Secs. 76.7, 76.9, 76.61, 76.914, 76.1003, 76.1302, and 76.1513 05/31/08 3060-0894 Secs. 54.313 and 54.316 and Certification Letter Accounting for Receipt of Federal Support and Rate Comparability Review and Certification 09/30/10 3060-0895 FCC 502 05/31/10 3060-0896 Broadcast Auction Form Exhibits 12/31/08 3060-0900 Compatibility of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.txt
    • 90 calendar days from release of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS WAIVED to the limited extent described herein in the case of the appeal of Union Baker Education Service District, Island City, Oregon. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102, this Order SHALL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.txt
    • Clinic Request for Review at 2-3. Letter from Michael O'Connor, Lake Delton Urgent Care, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed May 29, 2008); Letter from Michael O'Connor, Franciscan Skemp Prairie du Chien Clinic, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed May 29, 2008). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.txt
    • with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), section 47. C.F.R. � 54.720 IS WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Don Lawrence, Superintendent, Savannah R-III School District, to Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 02-6 (Dec. 13,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.txt
    • consideration consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that section 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS WAIVED to the extent provided therein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.txt
    • performing a complete review and analysis of the underlying applications, USAC shall either grant the application, or, if denying the application, provide the applicant with any and all grounds for denial. In addition to waiving the relevant rules and procedures that relate to Harvey's listing the wrong service start date, we note that Harvey was not in violation of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules that establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. USAC noted that Harvey's invoice deadline extension request was postmarked more than 60 days after the date of the Form 486 Notification Letter. See Administrator's Decision on Appeal. While this is true, the event that Harvey was seeking
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.txt
    • St. John the Baptist Catholic School; Request for Review and/or Waiver by The Children's Storefront. Request for Waiver by Hancock County Library System; Request for Waiver by Long Beach Public Library. Request for Waiver by Erie 1 BOCES; Request for Review by Hamblen County School District; Request for Waiver by Yeshiva Ktana Passaic. Request for Review by TIES. Specifically, section 54.720 of the Commission's rules provides parties with 60 days to appeal a decision by USAC to either USAC or the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2007). Prior to September 12, 2001, an appeal was required to be filed with USAC or the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of a decision by USAC. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2002). When
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.txt
    • to the limited extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS WAIVED to the limited extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.txt
    • IS WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that section 47. C.F.R. � 54.720 IS WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), USAC REINSTATE the funding commitment no later
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
    • the filing requirements, review process, and the treatment of disbursements during the pending review process. Need: In implementing statutory requirements for the Universal Service support mechanism, these rules provide the framework and requirements for the review of decisions issued by the Administrator. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 254. Section Number and Title: 54.719 Parties permitted to seek review of Administrator decisions. 54.720 Filing deadlines. 54.721 General filing requirements. 54.722 Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau or the Commission. 54.723 Standard of review. 54.724 Time periods for Commission approval of Administrator decisions. 54.725 Universal service disbursements during pendency of a request for review and Administrator decision. PART 61-TARIFFS SUBPART E-GENERAL RULES FOR DOMINANT CARRIERS Brief Description: The Part 61 rules are designed to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.txt
    • (1964), aff'd sub. nom. Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967 (1966). Petition at 1. Id. Id. AM Auction Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 10566; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3568(a)(1) and Green Valley Broadcasters, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 13341, 13345-46 (2004) See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.txt
    • had provided all the information needed to complete the task. As to the latter, federal law poses no bar to assessing BitWise (or any other carrier) based on the revenues it reported in compliance with our reporting requirements, rather than based on revenue information reflected in untimely Form 499 filings. (last visited July 15, 2010). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.720(e). Although we deny these requests for review on the merits, at least one request for review is also deficient in that it was filed outside the 60-day window or did not comply with our filing requirements. See BitWise Request for Review (filed electronically 61 days after the USAC decision and failing to comply with the filing requirements set forth in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.txt
    • the Universal Service Administrator by Academy of Math and Science, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-487009, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, FCC 10-122 (released July 8, 2010) (Academy of Math and Science Order). See appendix A; 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). See appendix B. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Seven petitioners filed appeals with the Commission within 60 days of receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision (Galloway Charter School, Granada-Huntley-East Chain School District #2536, Henderson Memorial Public Library, Lake County High Schools, North Star Academy, Peavey Memorial Library, and Tunstall Middle School). Two other applicants filed their appeals within 14 days (Bethel-Tate Local School District and for St.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.txt
    • consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that waivers of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, ARE GRANTED to Ahi Ezer Yeshiva School, Buckingham County Public Schools, Derry Co-Op School District, Hancock Library System, Jemez Mountain School District, Long Beach Unified School District, Newmarket School District for FCC Form 471 Application Numbers 474136 and 584028, Newport School District, Philadelphia School District, Savannah River Challenge Program, School Administrative Unit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.txt
    • Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.504(b), 54.504(c), and 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(b), 54.504(c), and 54.507(c) ARE WAIVED for the petitioners listed in the appendix as provided herein, and that section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS WAIVED for the petitioners listed in footnote 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, that USAC SHALL COMPLETE its review of each remanded application listed in the appendix and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.txt
    • consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. In addition, we also find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.txt
    • consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), waivers of section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, ARE GRANTED to Academia Bautista de Puerto Nuevo; Davis Joint Unified School District; Dine Southwest High School; Ethel Hedgemen Lyle Middle and High School; Garr Academy of Mathematics and Entrepreneurial Studies; Golden Plains Unified School District; Guam Public School System; Lawrence Public Schools; Live Oak School District; Perry County School District; Perspectives
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.txt
    • before coming to the Commission. Pursuant to the Commission's rules, parties may seek review of USAC decisions with either USAC or the Commission, but there is no requirement that parties first go to USAC before requesting review from the Commission. As such, we deny as moot inContact's request for waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 54.720, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 54.720, and 54.722(a), that the request for review of the decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company filed by inContact, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.3, 54.720, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.720, and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.txt
    • USAC found that the FCC Forms 486 were filed late or not filed at all. These Petitioners, however, either claim that the late or missed filings were the result of clerical, ministerial, or procedural errors, or were due to circumstances beyond their control. In addition to waiving the FCC Form 486 deadline, we also find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC, for five Petitioners - Children of Peace, Guthrie Job Corps Center, Pojoaque Valley Schools, Saint Paul Public Schools, and Southeast Idaho Rural Vocational Distance Learning Network. Children of Peace School indicates that it was late filing its appeal because it was the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.txt
    • the E-rate program, eligible schools, libraries, and consortia that include eligible schools and libraries may apply for discounts for eligible telecommunications services, Internet access, and internal connections. The Commission's rules provide that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the relevant committee governing that division or directly from the Commission. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC. For those requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001, the appeal must have been filed with the Commission or USAC within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. The time
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.txt
    • applicants were late because of errors made by the service provider, and one service provider claims that the applicant failed to schedule its installation on time. Finally, in three appeals, the petitioners argue that they filed their FCC Forms 472 and 474 on time, but never received funding. In addition, for five petitioners, we find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of USAC decisions. Based on the facts and circumstances of these specific cases, we find that good cause exists to grant these appeals. As the Bureau found in the Canon-McMillan Order, we find that complete rejection of these invoices is not warranted, given that the applicants missed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.txt
    • consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), ARE WAIVED for Bancroft Neurohealth, Montgomery, Alabama; Camden Elementary School, Camden, Ohio; and Massac County Unit School District 1, Metropolis, Illinois to the extent necessary as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX List of Petitioners Applicant Application Number Funding Year
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.txt
    • because the petitioners have failed to show) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 342.049 Tm 108 Tz (special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline.) Tj 1 0 0 1 109.4 318.5 Tm 93 Tz (2.) Tj 1 0 0 1 145.4 318.549 Tm 107 Tz (Section) Tj 1 0 0 1 180.95 318.549 Tm /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.720) Tj 1 0 0 1 214.05 318.25 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Commission's rules establishes deadlines for affected parties to) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 305.799 Tm (seek review of decisions issued by USAC.3 The appeal must have been filed with the Commission or) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 292.849 Tm (USAC within 60 days
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.txt
    • in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), ARE WAIVED for Burlington Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School to the extent necessary as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.txt
    • consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), ARE WAIVED for Canutillo Independent School District, Texas; Danex Systems, Inc. (FCC Form 471 application number 449656), Brooklyn, New York; Hamilton/Clermont Cooperative Association, Ohio; Pearl River Public School, New York; and Preble Shawnee Local School District, Ohio, to the extent necessary as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.txt
    • Department of Information Systems, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 02-6, filed Aug. 22, 2011 (Petition for Reconsideration). Section 1.106(b)(1) of the Commission's rules provides that any person whose interests are adversely affected by an action taken by the Commission or its designated authority may seek reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b)(1) (2011). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2011); Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Boston Renaissance School, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD- 735147, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, DA 11-1240 (Wireline Comp. Bur. rel. July 27, 2011) (Boston Renaissance Order) (denying 50 appeals on the grounds that the petitioners
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.txt
    • 2011\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 432.7 213.399 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (\(Boston Renaissance) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 201.85 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (School Order\); 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 174.7 200.449 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 182.15 201.85 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (54.720 \(2011\). The E-rate program is more formally known as the schools and libraries) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 190.6 Tm (universal service support program.) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.6 173.049 Tm (Letter from Christopher L. Shearer, Franklin County Schools, to the Office of the Secretary, Federal) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 161.549 Tm (Communications Commission, CC Docket
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.txt
    • Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 415.449 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (We also grant a waiver to Lower Merion because it missed the deadline for filing its appeal with the Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 404.199 Tm 102 Tz (by three days. Section) Tj 1 0 0 1 163.4 404.199 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.720) Tj 1 0 0 1 193.65 403.949 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Commission's rules provides parties with 60 days to appeal a decision by) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 392.399 Tm 101 Tz (USAC to either USAC or the Commission. 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 289.65 390.799 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.txt
    • /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (1.106\(a\)\(1\) \(2011\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 66.7 222.5 Tm 53 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (2) Tj 1 0 0 1 85.2 217.949 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 114.45 216.299 Tm 72 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 121.65 218.199 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (54.720 \(2011\);) Tj 1 0 0 1 183.6 218.199 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Request for Waiver and Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administration by) Tj 1 0 0 1 66 206.649 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Agra Public Schools 1-134, et al, File No. SLD-363747, et a!., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 5684)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.txt
    • the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c) IS WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), IS WAIVED for Animas School District 6; Appleton Area School District; Aurora Public School; Beecher Community School District; Caldwell Independent School District; City Charter High School; Gooding Public Schools; Paterson School District; Saint John Vianney Cure of Ars School; Sheboygan Area School District; St. Francis De Sales School; Teach Wisconsin; Tornillo Independent
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.txt
    • for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.504(d) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(c)(1)(iii) and 54.720, ARE WAIVED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that USAC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.txt
    • GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that sections 54.507(d) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.507(d), 54.720, ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, that USAC SHALL COMPLETE its review and ISSUE approvals of the applicants' requests for the extension
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.txt
    • 2. 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Request for Review by Advantage Telecommunications Corp. of Action by Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5088, 5089, para. 5 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (``Contributors are on notice that we may deny future appeals for procedural defects.''). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). See Letter from USAC to Jose L. Solana, Counsel for Dorial Telecom, LLC, at 4-5 (dated Nov. 24, 2009). Dorial Request for Review at 2 n. 1. (continued . . .) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-486 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-486 � � � � � d e � � � � � � � � d e � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.txt
    • action consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release date of this order. In addition, we also find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules for Greater Albany and Lincoln County. Although Greater Albany's appeal was filed late, the district filed the appeal as soon they received actual notice of the denial. Lincoln County's appeal was only two days late. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.txt
    • Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Argos Public Library, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-737946, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 16109 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2010). See appendix A; 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). See appendix B; 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Al-Noor School appears to have attempted to file its FCC Form 471 application on time, on Friday, February 19, 2010, but, due to an apparent technical problem with USAC's website, the application was not accepted. Therefore, after speaking with USAC on the following Monday, Al-Noor filed a paper version of its application on Tuesday, February 23, 2010. Letter from Hamid
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.txt
    • accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that sections 54.504(c) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(c) and 54.720, ARE WAIVED to the extent necessary as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.txt
    • further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that waivers of section 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, ARE GRANTED to Eastchester Union Free School District, Eastchester, NY; Elizabeth Board of Education, Elizabeth, NJ; Hall-Dale Schools, SAD #16, Farmingdale, ME; Milton Town School District, Milton, VT; Tarek Ibn Ziyad Academy, Inver Grove Heights, MN; Windsor Elementary School. Windsor, IL; and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.txt
    • GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that sections 54.507(d) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d), 54.720, ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, that USAC SHALL COMPLETE its review of the remanded application and ISSUE an award or a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.txt
    • by the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) to dismiss Sacred Heart's appeal to USAC because it was postmarked more that 60 days after the date on an FCC Form 471 Outside of Window letter. On our own motion, we reconsider the SAU 41 Order and waive the appeal filing deadline for Sacred Heart. While 54.720(c) of the Commission's rules stipulates that appeals must be submitted within 60 days of the decision being appealed, Sacred Heart filed its appeal only a few days late. Turning to the merits, we find that Sacred Heart has demonstrated special circumstances to justify a waiver of the E-rate program's FCC Form 471 filing deadline. Consistent with the Bureau's decision in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.txt
    • the grounds that petitioners failed to submit their appeals either to the Commission or to USAC within 60 days as required by the Commission's rules). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c) (2011). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2011). The Commission may waive any provision of its rules for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2011). � � kdC � % 7 > C M N b q x } � � � � � � � � � % 7 > C M N b q x } � � � � � � � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.txt
    • deny five requests from petitioners seeking review of decisions made by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) under the E-rate program (more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program). In each case, USAC refused to permit petitioners to make changes to their applications after they had submitted them. We first grant four petitioners waivers of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules because we find they submitted their appeals to the Commission, or filed a service change request with USAC, within a reasonable period of time of actual notice of a clerical error or a decision by USAC not to correct the error. Based on our review of the record, we find that 12 petitioners have demonstrated that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.txt
    • an appeal of a denial of funding is likely to cause petitioners to miss the program's subsequent procedural deadlines in that funding year. We also find good cause to waive section 54.504(a) of the Commission's rules to allow Marian High School to amend its FCC Form 471 regarding the telephone service it requested. Consistent with precedent, we also waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules for Van Alstyne Independent School District. We therefore remand the underlying applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application listed in the appendix and issue an award or a denial based
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.txt
    • universal service support program.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 95.799 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (See) Tj 1 0 0 1 90.95 95.799 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 133.4 93.899 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 140.849 95.799 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.720.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 73.949 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Request for Waiver by Idabel School District) Tj 1 0 0 1 259.9 73.949 Tm 69 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (5) Tj 1 0 0 1 267.35 73.949 Tm 90 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and Request for Waiver by Otsego Nothem Catskills BOCES.) Tj ET endstream endobj
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.txt
    • for further processing. Upon remand, USAC shall provide these petitioners, listed in appendix B, with a limited 15-day opportunity to file additional documentation to support their calculations of the correct discount rates. In addition, we direct USAC to accept information already provided by the applicants that USAC had deemed late. Consistent with precedent, we also grant two waivers of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules establishing deadlines for the filing of appeals. On our own motion, we also waive section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules and any USAC procedural deadlines, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. We find good cause to waive section 54.507(d) because filing an appeal of a denial is likely to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.txt
    • Commission's rules and any USAC procedural deadlines, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. We find good cause to waive section 54.507(d) because filing an appeal of a denial of funding is likely to cause petitioners to miss the program's subsequent procedural deadlines in that funding year. Consistent with precedent, we also waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules for two petitioners. We therefore remand the underlying applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of the applications listed in the appendix and issue an award or a denial based on a complete
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.txt
    • Commission's rules and any USAC procedural deadlines, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. We find good cause to waive section 54.507(d) because filing an appeal of a denial of funding is likely to cause petitioners to miss the program's subsequent procedural deadlines in that funding year. Consistent with precedent, we also waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules for Clarendon County School District because we find they submitted their appeal to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision. We therefore remand the underlying applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.txt
    • the petitioners have failed to show special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline). The requests for waiver and review are listed in the appendix. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. The Commission may waive any provision of its rules for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.txt
    • Order, 18 FCC Rcd 26407, 26424, para. 40 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.503(c)(4). See Aberdeen School District Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8763, para. 9 (waiving the Commission's competitive bidding rules for petitioners who, while not waiting the the full 28 days before entering into a contract, missed that deadline by a minimal number of days). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (requiring appeal within 60 days of a decision by USAC. See also Requests for Review and/or Waiver of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by ABC Unified School District, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-584091, Order, 26 FCC Rcd 11019, 11019, para. 2 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2011) (granting petitioners waivers of our filing deadline
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.txt
    • with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that sections 54.503(c)(2)(iii)-(iv), 54.504(a)(1)(iv)-(v), 54.507(d), 54.508 and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.503(c)(2)(iii)-(iv), 54.504(a)(1)(iv)-(v), 54.507(d), 54.508 and 54.720 ARE WAIVED for the petitioners listed in the appendix to the limited extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader, Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Academy of Excellence Phoenix, Arizona 523299 2006 Nov.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.pdf
    • of USAC's filing deadline and allow the applicants another opportunity to respond to USAC's requests for further information. We also dismiss an appeal filed by Yeshiva Mesivta Wiznitz USA (Yeshiva) because its funding request was fulfilled by USAC after it filed its appeal. Consistent with precedent, we also waive, for Warren Consolidated School District (Warren) and Northwest Institute (Northwest), section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which requires applicants to seek review of a USAC decision within 60 days, because we find they submitted their appeals to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision or filed their appeal only a few days late. We therefore remand the underlying applications listed in the appendices
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.txt
    • Paragraph 4 is corrected to read as follows: ``IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), ARE WAIVED for Burlington Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School to the extent necessary as provided herein.'' FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission � � $ m m :
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-376A1.txt
    • be filed on or after September 12, 2001 and that were or are received by the Commission on or after September 12, 2001 in accordance with the procedures set forth in amended rule 1.4(f). Part 54 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 1. Section is amended by adding at the end of section 54.720(e): 54.720 Filing Deadlines. ****** (e) ****** Note: Due to the emergency events in Washington, D.C. resulting in the interruption of regular mail delivery, until further notice, requests for review pursuant to sections 720(a), (b), (c), or (d) shall be filed within 60 days from the date of the issuance of the relevant decision, and may be filed electronically via either
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.txt
    • Alaska Order, para. 17. Eighth Order on Reconsideration. See, e.g., Request for Review by Copan Public Schools of the Universal Service Administrator, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-26231, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd. 5498 (2000). 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.720(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(a), 54.720(b). In October 1998, the Board of Directors (Board) of the predecessor corporation to USAC with responsibility for the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism authorized staff to process appeals in accordance with principles set forth by the Board and by the Schools and Libraries Committee of the Board. 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.720(a). We
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.txt
    • using the postmarked date furthers the goals of improving program operation and ensuring a fair and equitable distribution of the benefits of the program. Thus, we find that it is consistent with public interest that we treat appeals to the Administrator or the Commission as having been filed on the date they are postmarked. We therefore add a new section 54.720(e) to our rules. Docket Number Change We adopt a minor procedural amendment conforming our rules to reflect the change in docket numbers for filing appeals. Specifically, we change the wording of section 54.721, which describes the filing requirements for requests for reviews for the entire Universal Service program, to replace the last line of paragraph (a) as follows: instead of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-72A1.txt
    • Decision Letter, it contacted its service provider for information and the service provider was not responsive. 4. Under delegated authority from the Commission, the Bureau reviewed the appeal. In the Bureau Order, the Bureau affirmed SLD's decision, finding that Mescalero's appeal to SLD was not filed within the requisite 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules. The Bureau also denied Mescalero's request for waiver of the Commission's rules, concluding that Mescalero had not demonstrated special circumstances necessary to warrant a deviation from the general rule. Having concluded that the initial appeal was untimely, the Bureau Order did not address the merits of SLD's underlying decision in the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. 5.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-150A1.txt
    • for paying service provider invoices); On-Tech Comments at 5 (recommending seven days for invoice processing). See AT&T Reply Comments at 3-4. Average time; measured from the date the invoice is submitted to the date payment is issued. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719. The request for review must be filed within 60 days from the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). CGCS Comments at 13; HITN Comments at 4; Qwest Comments at 12; HITN Reply Comments at 2; Qwest Reply Comments at 11 (suggesting that the Administrator should have firm deadlines); SDDE Reply Comments at 8-9. See, e.g., GCI Comments at 28; HITN Comments at 4 (recommends 60 days); ISTE Comments at 25 (recommends 90 days); Kellogg Comments at 10 (six
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.txt
    • 0 0 1 229.2 231.149 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 271.199 229.5 Tm 72 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 283.65 231.149 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.719-54.725,) Tj 1 0 0 1 351.1 231.149 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (For purposes of 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, USAC's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 219.6 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (invoice is a decision by the Administrator. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Request for Review) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 207.85 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (by Big River Telephone Company, LLC, Order, 22 FCC Rcd. 4974, 4976, at n. 17 \(Wireline
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992144.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992144.txt
    • 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order grants the Request for Review of United School District 217, in Rolla, Kansas (USD 217), that was received by the Commission on July 12, 1999. USD 217's Request for Review seeks review of the Universal Service Administrative Company's (USAC or Administrator) Decision on Appeal, dated June 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's Rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the funding commitment decision for which review is sought. Because USD 217's appeal to USAC was not filed within 30 days of USAC's funding commitment decision, USAC rejected USD 217's appeal as untimely filed. In this Order, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) reverses USAC's Decision on
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992202.txt
    • �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- ���x ��x � �This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal dated May 18, 1999 by the Methacton School District (Methacton). The Letter of Appeal seeks review concerning funding requests made by Methacton for Arcola Intermediate School (Arcola) and Audubon Elementary School (Audubon). Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision for which review is �With respect to Arcola Intermediate School, the relevant Administrator's Decision on Appeal was dated April 13, 1999. Therefore, the Arcola portion of the appeal was not filed within the specified 30 day period, and will be dismissed
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992219.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992219.txt
    • its appeal to the Administrator should be considered timely. Specifically, St. Margaret's-McTernan states that: (1) the January 19, 1999 SLD letter did not specify a 30-day requirement for filing appeals, and (2) the appeal process was not announced on the SLD website until March 9, 1999, which was the first time it became aware of the 30-day requirement. . Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules requires schools to seek review of an SLD initial decision within 30 days of the issuance of that decision. St. Margaret's-McTernan, by its own admission, filed its Letter of Appeal with the Administrator no earlier than March 10, 1999. Therefore, because St. Margaret's-McTernan filed its Letter of Appeal with the Administrator outside the specified 30-day period,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992239.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992239.txt
    • Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 20, 1999 Released: October 20, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Bremerton School District 100-C, of Bremerton, Washington, that was received by the Commission on June 4, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated April 30, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992242.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992242.txt
    • Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 20, 1999 Released: October 20, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Monrovia Consortium, of East Palo Alto, California, that was received by the Commission on August 9, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated July 7, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992365.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992365.txt
    • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 29, 1999 Released: October 29, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Lancaster County Public Schools of Kilmarnock, Virginia, that was received by the Commission on August 2, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated June 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992366.txt
    • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 29, 1999 Released: October 29, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Norfolk Public Schools of Norfolk, Virginia, that was received by the Commission on August 2, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated June 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992486.doc
    • Appeal of Kristina J. Lewis, Havana Community Unit Schools District 126, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (date unknown, received August 11, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Kristina J. Lewis, Havana Community Unit Schools District 126, to Appeals Committee, Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company (date unknown, received August 9, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Notably, even if HCUSD had not filed a previous appeal with USAC, this appeal to the Commission would have been untimely in any event.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992488.doc
    • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: November 9, 1999 Released: November 9, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Independence Unified School District 446, Independence, Kansas, that was received by the Commission on June 14, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 10, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992590.doc
    • appeal from the Pediatric Library of Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital (Rainbow), Cleveland, Ohio, that was received by the Commission on June 24, 1999. In its Letter of Appeal, Rainbow asserts that it filed a timely appeal of a decision by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) consistent with the requirements of section 54.720, and therefore the merits of its request for review of SLD's initial decision denying certain discounts should be considered by the Commission. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss Rainbow's Letter of Appeal to the Commission. 2. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of SLD's decisions require affected parties to seek an appeal within thirty days of the issuance of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992591.doc
    • National Exchange Carrier ) Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 19, 1999 Released: November 19, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Peoria Public Schools (Peoria) that was received by the Commission on June 25, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 25, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992611.doc
    • Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Brighton New York School District that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 26, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992612.doc
    • Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Cotulla Independent School District dated June 25, 1999, but received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 26, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992613.doc
    • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Forsyth County Schools that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 26, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992615.doc
    • No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Pioneerland Library System, received by the Commission on June 25, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 14, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992617.doc
    • Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Spencer East Brookfield Regional School District that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 25, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992727.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992727.txt
    • Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Imogene Horse, Director, and Dana Crews, Technical Services Librarian, Chadron Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, dated August 30, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Imogene Horse, Director, and Dana Crews, Technical Services Librarian, Chadron Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, dated August 30, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992728.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992728.txt
    • date its Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Horton appeals that decision. In the appeal before us, Horton argues that its appeal before the SLD was erroneously denied for untimeliness because Horton mailed its appeal on August 5, 1999, two days prior to the 30-day deadline. Horton also notes the hardship resulting from the denial of its appeal. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted in the Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued by the Administrator to Horton, ``[i]f you wish to appeal to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992729.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992729.txt
    • December 6, 1999 Released: December 6, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Logandale Middle School, Chicago, Illinois, seeking review a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 31, 1999. The Commission received Logandale's Letter of Appeal on September 10, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992730.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992730.txt
    • December 6, 1999 Released: December 6, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letters of Appeal of the Yeshiva of Central Queens, of Flushing, New York, that were received by the Commission on September 13, 1999 and September 21, 1999, which seek review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated July 13, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letters of Appeal were not filed within the specified 30-day period, they
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992772.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992772.txt
    • 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Regional Educational Media Center, submitted on behalf of the Copper Country Intermediate School District of Hancock, Michigan, which was received by the Commission on September 13, 1999. The instant Letter of Appeal seeks review of an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, which is dated August 11, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992785.doc
    • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 13, 1999 Released: December 13, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Sacred Heart Parish School that was received by the Commission on September 15, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 11, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992796.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992796.txt
    • with specified filing deadlines. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 20, 1999 by Carolina Friends School IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b); see also "SLD Procedure for Post-Commitment Appeals" at http://www.sl.universalservice/org/reference/appeals.asp. ("To submit a letter of appeal to the SLD": 1. Write a letter and submit it by mail to the SLD so that is received no later than 30 days after the date your FCD Letter was issued.") (emphasis in original). Appeal Letter at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992797.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992797.txt
    • CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Foxcroft Academy, received by the Commission on September 20, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 18, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992799.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992799.txt
    • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Lincoln Intermediate Unit that was received by the Commission on September 24, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 24, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992800.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992800.txt
    • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Putnam City Schools, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma received by the Commission on October 19, 1999, which seeks review of the SLD's Funding Commitment Letter, dated February 9, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992802.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992802.txt
    • ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the White Oak Public School District dated September 15, 1999, but received by the Commission on September 21, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 18, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992803.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992803.txt
    • Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of St. John - St. James Lutheran School, Reedsville, Wisconsin, received by the Commission on September 17, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 11, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992831.doc
    • 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of John Curtis Christian Schools, River Ridge, Louisiana, that was received by the Commission on September 17, 1999, which seeks review of a decision issued on August 10, 1999, by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator). Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992832.doc
    • ORDER Adopted: December 16, 1999 Released: December 17, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Morton Memorial Schools that was received by the Commission on September 17, 1999, which seeks review of the Universal Service Administrative Company's (USAC or Administrator) Decision on Appeal, dated August 11, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. �1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992833.doc
    • 16, 1999 Released: December 17, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review of the School District of the Borough of Wilkinsburg (Wilkinsburg), Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania that was received by the Commission June 8, 1999, which seeks review of the Universal Service Administrative Company's (USAC or Administrator) Decision on Appeal, dated April 16, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. In its Request for Review, Wilkinsburg states that it did not receive any notification of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000016.doc
    • response, the Administrator issued a Decision on Appeal, stating that it would not be able to consider Madison's Letter of Appeal because it was not received by SLD within 30 days of the date of the SLD decision letter as required by the Commission's rules. Subsequently, Madison filed the instant request for review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules requires schools to seek review of an SLD initial decision within 30 days of the issuance of that decision. In order to timely appeal the August 3, 1999 decision letter, Madison was required to have filed its appeal by September 2, 1999. Because Madison filed its Letter of Appeal with the Administrator outside of the specified
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000017.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000017.txt
    • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: January 6, 2000 Released: January 7, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Mark Twain Union Elementary School District, that was received by the Commission on September 27, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 6, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000021.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000021.txt
    • dated August 16, 1999; Letter of Appeal from Wayne F. Moss, Trinity County Office of Education, on behalf of Weaverville Elementary School District, to Schools and Libraries Corporation, dated August 16, 1999; Letter of Appeal from Wayne F. Moss, Trinity County Office of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, dated September 28, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000041.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000041.txt
    • Released: January 11, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Butts County Schools, Jackson, Georgia, which seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company on May 25, 1999. The Commission received Butts County's Letter of Appeal on June 28, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000042.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000042.txt
    • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: January 10, 2000 Released: January 11, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Denison Independent School District of Denison, Texas that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 11, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000084.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000084.txt
    • of the ) National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) CC Docket No. 97-21 ORDER Adopted: January 14, 2000 Released: January 18, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed October 4, 1999 by the North Central Area Schools, which seeks review of a decision of the Administrator, dated August 31, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000085.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000085.txt
    • Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Kathy Hicks, Technology Coordinator, River Road Independent School District, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (dated November 13, 1999, received November 16, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Kathy Hicks, Technology Coordinator, River Road Independent School District, to Schools & Libraries Division (dated November 13, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000174.doc
    • February 8, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Bradford Community Unit School District #1, that was received by the Commission on October 22, 1999, which seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) on July 8, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000175.doc
    • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Frederick Smeigh, Frazier School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 26, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Frederick Smeigh, Frazier School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, the Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 26, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000176.doc
    • Corporation, filed August 9, 1999; Letter of Appeal from Jane Kellogg, Kellogg Consulting, L.L.C., on behalf of Swink School District 21, to Schools and Libraries Corporation, filed August 9, 1999; Letter of Appeal from Jane Kellogg, Kellogg Consulting, L.L.C., on behalf of Tyrone Independent School District 53, to Schools and Libraries Division, filed September 30, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000287.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000287.txt
    • of the ) National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) CC Docket No. 97-21 ) ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2000 Released: February 16, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed November 17, 1999 by Binas Yisaschor, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal issued June 22, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000288.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000288.txt
    • Released: February 16, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Reedsville School District (Reedsville) of Reedsville, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 21, 1999. The Commission received Reedsville's Letter of Appeal on November 23, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000289.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000289.txt
    • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) CC Docket No. 97-21 ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2000 Released: February 16, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. The Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) has under consideration a Letter of Appeal received December 16, 1999, from Stanton Public Library (Stanton), which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, issued June 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000329.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000329.txt
    • February 22, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the McMinnville SDA Elementary School (McMinnville) of McMinnville, Oregon, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 9, 1999. The Commission received McMinnville's Letter of Appeal on December 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000330.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000330.txt
    • February 22, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the LaSalle Academy of New York, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 1999. The Commission received LaSalle Academy's Letter of Appeal on November 12, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000331.doc
    • By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Rio Grande School (Rio Grande) of Santa Fe, New Mexico, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on October 26, 1999. The Commission received Rio Grande's Letter of Appeal on December 16, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000332.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000332.txt
    • By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Southwest Dubois County School Corporation (Southwest Dubois) of Huntingburg, Indiana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 30, 1999. The Commission received Southwest Dubois's Letter of Appeal on November 1, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000382.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000382.txt
    • February 25, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Alamo Heights Independent School District (Alamo), San Antonio, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on October 26, 1999. The Commission received Alamo's Letter of Appeal on November 26, 1999. Under Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000424.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000424.txt
    • COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letters of Appeal of Randy Ackerman, Holcomb Unified School District, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed December 6, 1999, December 13, 1999). See Letters of Appeal of Randy Ackerman, Holcomb Unified School District, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed December 7, 1999, December 9, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000425.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000425.txt
    • 2000 by Kasson-Mantorville Schools, Kasson, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of James Turner, Kasson-Mantorville Schools, to Federal Communications Commission (filed January 10, 2000). See Letter of Appeal of James Turner, Kasson-Mantorville Schools, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed October 28, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000426.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000426.txt
    • DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Ronald J. Maniglia, Principal, Sacred Heart School, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed November 26, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Ronald Maniglia, Principal, Sacred Heart School, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed August 20, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000427.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000427.txt
    • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Scott R. Brown, Director of Business Service, McFarland School District, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed January 11, 2000). See Letter of Appeal of Dave Pedersen, Director of Technology Services, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed September 20, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000428.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000428.txt
    • Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Nathaniel Hawthorne, Attorney, to Federal Communications Commission (filed December 9, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Nathaniel Hawthorne, Attorney, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed with Schools and Libraries Division on December 9, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000497.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000497.txt
    • Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letters of Appeal of Lonnie E. Palmer, City School District of Albany, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed December 9, 1999, January 14, 2000). See Letters of Appeal of Lonnie E. Palmer, City School District of Albany, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed December 2, 1999, January 12, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000529.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000529.txt
    • By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Newman Grove Public Schools (Newman Grove) of Newman Grove, Nebraska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 18, 1999. The Commission received Newman Grove's Letter of Appeal on December 30, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000530.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000530.txt
    • School District, Hanover, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Dr. Barbara Rupp, Superintendent, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed November 16, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Dr. Barbara Rupp, Superintendent, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed November 15, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000560.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000560.txt
    • IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Michael S. Pruitt, District Technology Coordinator, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed November 1, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Michael S. Pruitt, District Technology Coordinator, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed November 1, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000610.doc
    • 20, 2000 Released: March 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Bemidji (Bemidji), Bemidji, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on October 1, 1999. The Commission received Bemidji's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000611.doc
    • 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Detroit Lakes (Detroit Lakes), Detroit Lakes, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on October 1, 1999. The Commission received Detroit Lakes's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000612.doc
    • 2000 Released: March 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Hillsboro (Hillsboro), Hillsboro, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on October 1, 1999. The Commission received Hillsboro's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000613.doc
    • 2000 Released: March 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Jamestown (Jamestown), Jamestown, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on October 1, 1999. The Commission received Jamestown's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000614.doc
    • 2000 Released: March 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Mayville (Mayville), Mayville, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on November 12, 1999. The Commission received Mayville's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000732.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000732.txt
    • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dave Beckman, Lamont School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed January 6, 2000) (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Dave Beckman, Lamont School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company (filed January 3, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000761.doc
    • Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator). The SLD refused to consider Amelia's appeal of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter because the appeal was received more than 30 days after the date of issuance of the letter. Amelia requests review of the SLD's action. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Amelia's appeal. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter denying Amelia's request for discounted services under the schools and libraries support mechanism
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000762.doc
    • not consider West County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. West County now appeals that decision, arguing that its request for corrections to its funding commitments were not intended to ``appeal'' an SLD decision, but rather to request the correction of alleged errors in the SLD's calculations. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000837.doc
    • Appeal from Velma D. Eisenberger, Principal, United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, to Federal Communications Commission (filed February 3, 2000). See Letter of Appeal from Velma D. Eisenberger, Principal, United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company (filed September 14, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000838.doc
    • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Elk Grove Village Public Library (Elk Grove Village) of Elk Grove Village, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 15, 2000. The Commission received Elk Grove Village's Letter of Appeal on March 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000851.doc
    • the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Highland Community School District of Ainsworth - Riverside (Highland) of Riverside, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 3, 1999. The Commission received Highland's Letter of Appeal on November 1, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000852.doc
    • its appeal when, in fact, three funding decision commitment letters (application numbers 142293, 123302, and 124574) were issued October 5, 1999. The November 1 letter of appeal was received within the 30-day deadline established by the October 5, 1999, issuance of the funding commitment letters. With respect to Vancouver's appeal from the August 17 funding commitment decision letter, under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted in the funding commitment decision letter issued by the Administrator to Vancouver, ``[i]f you wish to appeal to the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001059.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001059.txt
    • 2000. This Order dismisses, as untimely, Central Intermediate's Letter of Appeal to the extent that it seeks review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's (USAC or Administrator) Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on May 19, 1999 for Application Number 108215. As noted, the Commission received Central Intermediate's Letter of Appeal on February 14, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001233.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001233.txt
    • funding request had been omitted from the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. On February 25, 2000, the SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Flora's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Flora subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001277.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001277.txt
    • Blessed Sacrament School, Washington, DC, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Schools and Libraries Corporation, filed April 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001278.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001278.txt
    • or Administrator) on November 2, 1999. Because Brevard County failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Brevard County's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on November 2, 1999. The instant Letter of Appeal was filed with
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001279.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001279.txt
    • 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Calallen Independent School District (Calallen), Corpus Christi, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 1, 1999. The Commission received Calallen's Letter of Appeal on February 29, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001280.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001280.txt
    • 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Casa Grande Union High School (Casa Grande), Casa Grande, Arizona, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 21, 1999. The Commission received Casa Grande's Letter of Appeal on February 23, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001281.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001281.txt
    • 13, 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Covina-Valley Unified School District (Covina-Valley), Covina, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 17, 2000. The Commission received Covina-Valley's Letter of Appeal on March 27, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001282.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001282.txt
    • June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Enlarged City School District of Troy (Troy), Troy, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 19, 2000. The Commission received Troy's Letter of Appeal on February 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001283.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001283.txt
    • Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Kerkhoven-Murdock-Sunburg Independent School District No. 775 (Kerkhoven), Kerkhoven, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Kerkhoven's Letter of Appeal on May 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001284.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001284.txt
    • 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by the Milwaukee Jewish Day School (MJDS), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 17, 1999. The Commission received MJDS's Letter of Appeal on December 14, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001285.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001285.txt
    • issue here is dated February 16, 2000, but North Chicago has provided a postmark indicating that the letter was not actually issued until March 20, 2000. SLD has confirmed this error. See Letter from Tyrone Pipkin, North Chicago Community Unit School District #187, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 23, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001365.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001365.txt
    • June 23, 2000 Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Austin Public Library (Austin), Austin, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 14, 2000. The Commission received Austin's Letter of Appeal on March 22, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001366.txt
    • it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. B. F. Jones filed another appeal with SLD on September 20, 1999. On March 20, 2000, SLD again declined to reconsider B. F. Jones' request for review of FRN 170032. B. F. Jones subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001367.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001367.txt
    • June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Des Moines Independent School District (Des Moines), Des Moines, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 1, 2000. The Commission received Des Moines' Letter of Appeal on June 7, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001369.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001369.txt
    • Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Gridley Unified School District (Gridley Unified), Gridley, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2000. The Commission received Gridley Unified 's Letter of Appeal on June 7, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001370.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001370.txt
    • Madison filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its application. On March 1, 2000, the SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Madison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Madison subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001371.doc
    • 2000 Released: June 28, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Nicolet Distance Education Network (Nicolet Network), Rhinelander, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 26, 2000. The Commission received Nicolet Network's Letter of Appeal on June 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001372.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001372.txt
    • February 25, 2000, Pinellas filed appeals with SLD, requesting reconsideration of certain funding commitment decisions. The SLD issued several Administrator's Decisions on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Pinellas' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Pinellas subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001373.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001373.txt
    • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 202675. On March 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Queen of Peace's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Queen of Peace subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001374.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001374.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 279716. On March 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Red Wing's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Red Wing subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001375.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001375.txt
    • 2000 Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint Cecilia School (St. Cecilia), Ames, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2000. The Commission received St. Cecilia's Letter of Appeal on May 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001376.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001376.txt
    • Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy DivisionDeputy Chief,: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint Paul's School (St. Paul's), Wilmington, Delaware, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received St. Paul's Letter of Appeal on May 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001377.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001377.txt
    • 23, 2000 Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Algonquin Regional High School (Algonquin) of Northboro, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 22, 1999. The Commission received Algonquin's Letter of Appeal on February 12, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001378.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001378.txt
    • DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Margaret Ford, St. Michael School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 24, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter from Margaret Ford, St. Michael School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 28, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001379.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001379.txt
    • 23, 2000 Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Stratford Board of Education (Stratford), Stratford, Connecticut, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 22, 1999. The Commission received Stratford's Letter of Appeal on March 9, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. that the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001380.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001380.txt
    • Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Talmud Torah Siach Yitzchok (Talmud), Far Rockaway, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Talmud's Letter of Appeal on May 30, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001510.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001510.txt
    • on its application and would like consideration for the services. On October 27, 1999, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Battle Lake's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Battle Lake subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001511.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001511.txt
    • 2000, Dearborn filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 233020. On March 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Dearborn's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dearborn subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001512.txt
    • filed a request for review to supplement its application for discounted services. On March 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Minneapolis' request because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Minneapolis subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001513.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001513.txt
    • Lady filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On October 27, 1999, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Our Lady's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Our Lady subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001514.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001514.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 289285. On March 26, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Oxford Hills' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Oxford Hills subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001515.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001515.txt
    • Adopted: July 7, 2000 Released: July 11, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Wathena Unified School District 406 (Wathena), Wathena, Kansas, on April 11, 2000. Wathena seeks review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 9, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001516.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001516.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 278849. On March 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider York County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. York County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001546.doc
    • The SLD decisions related only to FRN 232501 and FRN 232509 and did not dismiss Eastland's appeal regarding FRN 232503. On February 3, 2000, Eastland filed the instant appeal with the Commission regarding the two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal as well as FRN 232503. In the appeal before us, Eastland requests reconsideration of its application for discounted services. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal of a funding commitment decision must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted in the Funding Commitment Decision Letter to Eastland, ``[i]f you wish to appeal to the SLD, your appeal must be
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001547.doc
    • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James Konantz, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 18, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter from George Beckwith, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed November 5, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001620.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001620.txt
    • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Carle Place Union Free School District (Carle Place), Carle Place, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 22, 1999. The Commission received Carle Place's Letter of Appeal on March 22, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001621.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001621.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 189111. On February 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Cerebral Palsy's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Cerebral Palsy subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001623.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001623.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Mountain Home School District 193 (Mountain Home), Mountain Home, Idaho, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on December 29, 1999. The Commission received Mountain Home's Letter of Appeal on February 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. that the Letter
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001624.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001624.txt
    • July 24, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by the Northboro Public Schools (Northboro), Northboro, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 31, 1999. The Commission received Northboro's Letter of Appeal on February 14, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001718.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001718.txt
    • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Carmichaels Area School District (Carmichaels), Carmichaels, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Carmichaels' Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001719.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001719.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Caroline County School District (Caroline County), Bowling Green, Virginia, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 3, 2000. The Commission received Caroline County's Letter of Appeal on May 24, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001720.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001720.txt
    • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Carteret Public Schools (Carteret), Carteret, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 3, 2000. The Commission received Carteret's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001721.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001721.txt
    • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by the City of Boston, Department of Neighborhood Development (City of Boston), Boston, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 31, 2000. The Commission received the City's Letter of Appeal on May 18, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001722.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001722.txt
    • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Columbia Borough School District (Columbia Borough), Columbia, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 5, 2000. The Commission received Columbia Borough's Letter of Appeal on June 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001723.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001723.txt
    • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Homer-Center School District (Homer-Center), Homer City, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Homer-Center's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001724.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001724.txt
    • Released: August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lakeville School District (Lakeville), Lakeville, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Lakeville's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001725.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001725.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Learning Community Charter School (Learning Community), Jersey City, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 24, 2000. The Commission received Learning Community's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001726.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001726.txt
    • SLD had made an error in the amount funded. On December 9, 1999 and March 25, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ringwood's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ringwood subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001727.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001727.txt
    • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Roxbury Library Association (Roxbury), Roxbury, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Roxbury's Letter of Appeal on May 16, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001728.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001728.txt
    • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier BureauDeputy Chief,: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Savanna Elementary School (Savanna), Savanna, Oklahoma, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 21, 2000. The Commission received Savanna's Letter of Appeal on May 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001729.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001729.txt
    • 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Seattle Hebrew Academy (Seattle Hebrew), Seattle, Washington, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 3, 2000. The Commission received Seattle Hebrew's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001730.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001730.txt
    • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Anthony of Padua Catholic School (St. Anthony), Greenville, South Carolina, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 16, 2000. The Commission received St. Anthony's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001731.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001731.txt
    • L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Don Gallemore, Vernon Parish School Board, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 25, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal of Don Gallemore, Vernon Parish School Board, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed May 25, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but if the applicant files an appeal with the Administrator, the time period for filing with the Commission is tolled pending a decision by the Administrator). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001733.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001733.txt
    • to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 2, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Shari Peters Kitchen, Orchard View Schools, dated April 14, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Shari Peters-Kitchen, Orchard View Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 2, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001734.txt
    • 2000, Patton filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 227504. On March 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Patton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Patton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001822.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001822.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Children's Home of Burlington County (Children's Home), Newtown, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 10, 2000. The Commission received Children's Home's Letter of Appeal on May 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001823.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001823.txt
    • Released: August 11, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Kerman Unified School District (Kerman), Kerman, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 3, 2000. The Commission received Kerman's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001856.doc
    • and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 2, 2000 by Hayward Unified School District, Hayward, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from James Ogami, Hayward Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed May 1, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001858.doc
    • from David Coggshall, Lake County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, Application 200203 (filed May 4, 2000); Letter of Appeal from David Coggshall, Lake County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, Application 200204 (filed May 4, 2000); Letter of Appeal from David Coggshall, Lake County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, Application 200224 (filed May 4, 2000)(Letters of Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001889.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001889.txt
    • to deny FRNs 361280, 369881, 373742. On May 23, 2000 and May 24, 2000, SLD issued three Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Haven's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. New Haven subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001891.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001891.txt
    • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 294863 and 294865. On January 6, 2000 and March 25, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Whiting's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Whiting subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001892.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001892.txt
    • of SLD's decision to deny funding. On December 9, 1999 and March 25, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Whitehall City's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Whitehall City subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001910.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001910.txt
    • 24, 2000, Rockdale Independent filed with the Commission the instant Letter of Appeal, which seeks review of all five funding commitment decisions. On June 16, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decisions on Appeal approving in full Rockdale Independent's appeal regarding the one funding commitment decision that it did not address in its March 25 Administrator's Decisions on Appeal. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001918.doc
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Community Consolidated School District (Community Consolidated), Carol Stream, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 24, 2000. The Commission received Community Consolidated's Letter of Appeal on May 24, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001919.doc
    • Released: August 23, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Milton Public Library (Milton), Milton, Vermont, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 5, 2000. The Commission received Milton's Letter of Appeal on June 7, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001923.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001923.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Bethlehem Central School District (Bethlehem Central), Delmar, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 8, 2000. The Commission received Bethlehem Central's Letter of Appeal on June 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001924.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001924.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Bishop Hannan High School (Bishop Hannan), Scranton, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 24, 2000. The Commission received Bishop Hannan 's Letter of Appeal on June 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001925.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001925.txt
    • Company (USAC or Administrator) on October 26, 1999. Because Catoosa failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Catoosa's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on October 26, 1999. Catoosa filed appeals of the funding decision with
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001926.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001926.txt
    • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 398940. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider De Valls Bluff's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. De Valls Bluff subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001927.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001927.txt
    • 2000, Duluth filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 336879. On May 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Duluth's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Duluth subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001928.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001928.txt
    • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Egg Harbor City Public Schools (Egg Harbor City), Egg Harbor City, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 5, 2000. The Commission received Egg Harbor City's Letter of Appeal on June 9, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001929.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001929.txt
    • of SLD's decision to deny funding. On December 9, 1999 and March 21, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Fairfield Township's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Fairfield Township subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001930.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001930.txt
    • Cordova filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Folsom Cordova's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Folsom Cordova subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001931.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001931.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Franklin Lakes Public Schools (Franklin Lakes), Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Franklin Lakes's Letter of Appeal on June 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001932.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001932.txt
    • 24, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Granville Village School (Granville Village), Granville, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 25, 2000. The Commission received Granville Village's Letter of Appeal on May 30, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001933.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001933.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Oskaloosa School for Christian Instruction (Oskaloosa School), Oskaloosa, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 9, 2000. The Commission received Oskaloosa School's Letter of Appeal on June 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001934.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001934.txt
    • 17, 1999. Because Our Lady of Grace failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Our Lady of Grace's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on August 17, 1999. Our Lady of Grace filed appeals of the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001935.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001935.txt
    • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Paradise Unified School District (Paradise Unified), Paradise, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 22, 2000. The Commission received Paradise Unified's Letter of Appeal on June 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001936.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001936.txt
    • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 224232. On September 22, 1999 and March 25, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Racine's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Racine subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001937.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001937.txt
    • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 408296 and 408450. On May 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Rockwell-Swaledale Community's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Rockwell-Swaledale subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001938.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001938.txt
    • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Sault Ste. Marie Area Public Schools (Sault Ste. Marie), Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 3, 2000. The Commission received Sault Ste. Marie's Letter of Appeal on June 6, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001939.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001939.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 329985 and 403849. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Smithtown's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dearborn subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001940.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001940.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 411623. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Solon Springs' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Solon Springs subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001941.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001941.txt
    • that resulted in an incorrect service start date. On September 22, 1999 and March 24, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Springfield's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Springfield subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001942.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001942.txt
    • an appeal indicating that it wanted an increase in funding. On May 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Warren County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Warren County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002010.doc
    • 2000, Gulfport filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 328543. On May 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gulfport's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gulfport subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002043.doc
    • or Administrator) on September 21, 1999. Because Ann Arbor failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Ann Arbor's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on September 21, 1999. Ann Arbor filed an appeal of the funding
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002044.txt
    • with SLD on September 29, 1999, and filed a subsequent appeal on March 1, 2000. On March 10, 2000, SLD dismissed Dolton's request for review, stating that it could not consider Dolton's appeal because it was filed more than 30 days after the relevant decision was issued. Dolton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002073.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002073.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 419801. On June 8, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Corpus Christi's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Corpus Christi subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002074.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002074.txt
    • or Administrator) on August 3, 1999. Because Educational Service failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Educational Service's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on August 3, 1999. Educational Service filed appeals of the funding decision
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002076.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002076.txt
    • County filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Newton County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Newton County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002097.doc
    • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Penns Grove Carneys Point Regional School District (Penns Grove), Penns Grove, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2000. The Commission received Penns Grove's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002098.doc
    • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Don S. Gallemore, Vernon Parish School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 12, 2000. See Letter from Don S. Gallemore, Vernon Parish School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 25, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002181.doc
    • decision stating that it made a typographical error on its Form 471.'' On July 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Carbondale's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Carbondale subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002182.doc
    • County filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On May 30, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Coffee County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Coffee County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002183.doc
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Spartanburg County School District 6 (Spartanburg County), Spartanburg, South Carolina, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 3, 2000. The Commission received Spartanburg County's Letter of Appeal on July 3, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002188.doc
    • September 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Utica Community Schools (Utica), Sterling Heights, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 15, 2000. The Commission received Utica's Letter of Appeal on June 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002264.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002264.txt
    • change its mode of network delivery from wireless to wireline. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Carl Schurz's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Carl Schurz subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002265.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002265.txt
    • 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Central Agency for Jewish Education (CAJE), Miami, Florida, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received CAJE's Letter of Appeal on May 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002266.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002266.txt
    • October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Clifton Independent School District (Clifton), Clifton, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 31, 2000. The Commission received Clifton's Letter of Appeal on May 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002267.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002267.txt
    • 2000, Colonial filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 400998. On May 22, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colonial's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colonial subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002268.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002268.txt
    • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 374012 and 384961. On June 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Eastern Plains' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Eastern Plains subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002269.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002269.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 420899. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Garden Grove's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Garden Grove subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002270.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002270.txt
    • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Judge Memorial Catholic High School (Judge Memorial County), Salt Lake City, Utah, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 13, 2000. The Commission received Judge Memorial County's Letter of Appeal on April 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002271.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002271.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 458464. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Kanawha County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Kanawha County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002272.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002272.txt
    • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Marion School District 54 (Marion County), Marion, Montana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Marion County's Letter of Appeal on September 18, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002273.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002273.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its requests for discounts. On July 13, 2000, SLD issued four Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Newburgh's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Newburgh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002274.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002274.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 305643. On June 8, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Castle's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. New Castle subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002275.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002275.txt
    • SLD's decisions, stating that it did not receive the full amount requested. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Oscoda's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Oscoda subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002276.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002276.txt
    • October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Pace School (Pace County), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 1, 2000. The Commission received Pace County's Letter of Appeal on June 2, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002277.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002277.txt
    • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Tim O'Leary, Pinckneyville District #50, dated July 20, 1999 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Sue Andrews, Pinckneyville District #50, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 20, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Pinckneyville's Letter of Appeal seeks review of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued on July 20, 1999. Prior to filing this appeal with the Commission, however, Pinckneyville filed an appeal with SLD. See Letter from Tim O'Leary, Pinckneyville District #50, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed August 16, 1999. SLD issued an
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002278.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002278.txt
    • 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Racine Unified School District (Racine) of Racine, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 24, 2000. The Commission received Racine's Letter of Appeal on June 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002279.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002279.txt
    • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 399446 and 399610. On June 22, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Saint Andrew's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Saint Andrew subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002280.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002280.txt
    • requests for discounts that had not been considered by SLD. On May 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider San Juan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. San Juan subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002281.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002281.txt
    • Plains filed appeals of SLD's decisions denying SLD-192955 and SLD-194558. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Scotch Plains' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Scotch Plains subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002496.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002496.txt
    • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library, to Federal Communications Commission (filed August 8, 2000). See Letter from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated August 1, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002497.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002497.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 431274 and 431275. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ballinger's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ballinger subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002498.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002498.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 359338. On July 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Big Rapids' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Big Rapids subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002499.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002499.txt
    • Caledonia North filed appeals of SLD's decisions to deny funding. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued four Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Caledonia North's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Caledonia North subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002500.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002500.txt
    • 22, 1999, Douglas filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 22, 1999, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Douglas' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Douglas subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002501.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002501.txt
    • 26, 1999 (SLD-146388); Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, dated November 2, 1999 (SLD-147484) (Funding Commitment Decision Letters). Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr. and L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 19, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Egg Harbor's Letter of Appeal seeks review of the Funding Commitment Decision Letters issued on August 10, 1999, October 26, 1999, and November 2, 1999. Prior to filing this appeal with the Commission, however, Egg Harbor filed appeals with SLD. See Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr. and L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002502.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002502.txt
    • 2000, Elgin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 453138. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Elgin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Elgin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002503.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002503.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 414873. On July 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Holy Family's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Holy Family subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002504.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002504.txt
    • 2000, Jefferson filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 365086. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002505.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002505.txt
    • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 275030, 275032, 275038, 275041, and 275044. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002506.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002506.txt
    • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 384448, 384485, and 384520. On July 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Granite's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Granite subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002507.txt
    • Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lexington Public Schools (Lexington), Lexington, Nebraska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 6, 2000. The Commission received Lexington's Letter of Appeal on August 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002508.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002508.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 386438. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mt. Diablo's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mt. Diablo subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002509.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002509.txt
    • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Oregon Trail School District (Oregon Trail), Sandy, Oregon, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Oregon Trail's Letter of Appeal on August 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002510.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002510.txt
    • 2000, Southeastern filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 381559. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Southeastern's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Southeastern subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002511.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002511.txt
    • 2000, Southwick-Tolland filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 390427. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Southwick-Tolland's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Southwick-Tolland subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002512.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 408616. On July 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Anthony's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Anthony subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002513.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002513.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 476279. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Rita's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Rita subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002514.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002514.txt
    • 2000 Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Yeshiva Schools (Yeshiva), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 2000. The Commission received Yeshiva's Letter of Appeal on August 30, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002531.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002531.txt
    • 2000, Austin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 400580. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Austin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Austin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002532.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002532.txt
    • 2000, Bloomfield filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 431262. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bloomfield's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bloomfield subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002533.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002533.txt
    • 2000, Cumberland filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 348856. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Cumberland's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Cumberland subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002534.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002534.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Eastern Plains Instructional Television Consortium (Eastern Plains), Logan, New Mexico, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 9, 2000. The Commission received Eastern Plains' Letter of Appeal on April 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002535.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002535.txt
    • discounts to services that were not requested in its application. On July 6, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Florence Carlton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Florence Carlton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002536.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002536.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its request for funding. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Florence's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Florence subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002537.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002537.txt
    • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School District 156, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 8, 2000. See Letter from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School District 156, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed May 4, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002538.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002538.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 396144. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Moon Area's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Moon Area subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002539.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002539.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 434670. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider North Attleborough's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. North Attleborough subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002540.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002540.txt
    • 2000, Gildford filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 312153. On June 2, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gildford's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gildford subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002541.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002541.txt
    • 31, 2000, Roosevelt Elementary filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Roosevelt Elementary's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Roosevelt Elementary subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002542.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002542.txt
    • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kay Berry, Simpson County School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed June 23, 2000). See Letter from Jack M. McAlpin, Simpson County School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 2, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002543.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002543.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 421231. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider South Heart's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. South Heart subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002544.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002544.txt
    • stating that it should have received additional funding. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Peter & Paul's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Peter & Paul subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002545.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002545.txt
    • Patrick's filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Patrick's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Patrick subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002546.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002546.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 321400. On July 6, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Swift River's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Swift River subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002547.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002547.txt
    • 2000, Vacaville filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 395593. On July 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Vacaville's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Vacaville subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002548.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002548.txt
    • 2000, AECSD filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 404676. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider AECSD's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. AECSD subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002550.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002550.txt
    • 2000, Colton filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 424483. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002551.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002551.txt
    • 2000, Durham filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 367094. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Durham's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Durham subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002552.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002552.txt
    • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Elko County School District (Elko County), Elko, Nevada, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Elko County's Letter of Appeal on July 20, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002553.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002553.txt
    • 2000, Girard filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 324273. On July 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Girard's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Girard subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002554.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002554.txt
    • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 435901, 435905, and 458591. On August 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider McIntosh's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. McIntosh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002555.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002555.txt
    • 13, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative (Northeast), Hayti, South Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 2, 2000. The Commission received Northeast's Letter of Appeal on July 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002556.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002556.txt
    • 357508 due to SLD's conclusion that the funding request included ineligible services. On July 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ryan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ryan subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002557.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002557.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Traverse City Area Public Schools (Traverse City), Traverse City, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Traverse City's Letter of Appeal on July 11, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002558.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002558.txt
    • 2000, Xavier filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 418165. On August 9, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Xavier's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Xavier subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002559.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002559.txt
    • SLD's decision to deny FRNs 198760 and 198761. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ESU No. 6's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. ESU No. 6 subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002575.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002575.txt
    • for the period between January 1999 to June 1999. On August 12, 1999 and August 7, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Delta/Greely's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Delta/Greely subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002642.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002642.txt
    • 18, 2000, Houston Independent filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On July 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Houston Independent's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Houston Independent subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002650.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002650.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 324467. On September 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bryn Athyn's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bryn Athyn subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002651.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002651.txt
    • 8, 2000, EDmin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On September 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider EDmin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. EDmin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002652.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002652.txt
    • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by James Ward Elementary School (James Ward), Chicago, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 2, 2000. The Commission received James Ward's Letter of Appeal on September 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002653.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002653.txt
    • 7, 2000, Madera filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On September 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Madera's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Madera subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002654.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002654.txt
    • Released: November 29, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Norwell Public Schools (Norwell), Norwell, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 10, 2000. The Commission received Norwell's Letter of Appeal on September 11, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002655.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002655.txt
    • to approve its funding at a lower amount than requested. On August 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Richland Colfax's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Richland Colfax subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002656.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002656.txt
    • not receive the amount requested for Funding Request Number 397275. On August 17, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Rosa's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Rosa subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002657.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002657.txt
    • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 366305 and 366344. On August 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Ynez's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Ynez subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002658.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002658.txt
    • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint John Bosco High School (Saint John Bosco), Bellflower, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 2, 2000. The Commission received Saint John Bosco's Letter of Appeal on September 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002659.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002659.txt
    • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by South Brunswick Township School District (South Brunswick Township), Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 23, 2000. The Commission received South Brunswick Township's Letter of Appeal on June 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002660.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002660.txt
    • Released: November 29, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Westbrook High School (Westbrook), Westbrook, Connecticut, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 17, 2000. The Commission received Westbrook's Letter of Appeal on October 2, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002699.txt
    • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 28, 2000. Because Northwestern failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Northwestern's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on July 28, 2000. Northwestern filed an appeal of the funding decision
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002700.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002700.txt
    • two appeals of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 429028, 431862, and 431875. On August 29, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Western Heights' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Western Heights subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002785.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002785.txt
    • from the date of public notice of such action. 47 C.F.R. � 1.108. Request for Review by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 00-2555 (rel. November 13, 2000). A request for review of an Administrator's decision must be filed within thirty days of the date of the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). 1 ` a  � � � � � (c) � � � � � � � � � � 0 1 ` � � � � � � � 0 1 � � � � � �
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002808.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002808.txt
    • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 369592, 369658, and 369691. On August 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Soille San Diego's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Soille San Diego subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002818.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002818.txt
    • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lyman School District No. 42-1 (Lyman), Presho, South Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 2000. The Commission received Lyman's Letter of Appeal on September 6, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010024.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 443629 and 443634. On September 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Columbia's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Columbia subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010025.txt
    • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lake Havasu Unified School District (Lake Havasu), Lake Havasu City, Arizona, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 25, 2000. The Commission received Lake Havasu's Letter of Appeal on October 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010026.txt
    • 2000, Lakeview filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 409295. On November 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lakeview's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lakeview subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010027.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010027.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 397276 and 397523. On October 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Matawan-Aberdeen's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Matawan-Aberdeen subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010028.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010028.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Mt. Diablo Unified School District (Mt. Diablo), Concord, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 26, 2000. The Commission received Mt. Diablo's Letter of Appeal on November 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010029.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by New Brighton Area School District (New Brighton), New Brighton, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 11, 2000. The Commission received New Brighton's Letter of Appeal on October 16, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010030.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010030.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to funding. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Hampshire School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. New Hampshire School subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010031.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010031.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Newport Public School District (Newport County), Newport, Rhode Island, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 8, 2000. The Commission received Newport County's Letter of Appeal on October 30, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010032.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010032.txt
    • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 23, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 23, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010033.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010033.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 410362. On September 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Ana's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Ana subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010034.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010034.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 485878. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Tuckahoe Union's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Tuckahoe Union subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010145.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010145.txt
    • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 13, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed November 6, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010146.txt
    • appeal of the funding decision with SLD on June 15, 2000. SLD dismissed the appeal as untimely. Newburgh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal. Because Newburgh failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within thirty days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it filed a supplemental request for waiver of the 30-day appeal period on September 19, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline applies to all requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010148.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010148.txt
    • 23, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Sutton School, CNSU (Sutton County), Lyndonville, Vermont, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 17, 2000. The Commission received Sutton County's Letter of Appeal on November 9, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010175.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010175.txt
    • Decision Letter approving East Side Union's request for funding for internal connections. East Side Union filed appeals of the funding decision with SLD on December 8, 1999 and January 5, 2000. SLD dismissed the appeals as untimely. East Side Union subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal and request for waiver of the 30-day deadline for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline applies to all requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010200.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010200.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 333195. On November 28, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Atlantic County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Atlantic County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010201.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010201.txt
    • 2000, Clearview filed an appeal requesting additional funding for Funding Year 3. On November 28, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Clearview's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Clearview subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010202.txt
    • January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Granville Public Schools (Granville), Granville, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 18, 2000. The Commission received Granville's Letter of Appeal on December 12, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010203.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010203.txt
    • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, dated June 9, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 20, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Leon County's Letter of Appeal seeks review of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued on June 9, 2000. At the same time Leon County filed this appeal with the Commission, Leon County also filed an appeal with SLD. See Letter from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010204.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010204.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Levittown Union Free School District (Levittown Union), Levittown, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 10, 2000. The Commission received Levittown Union's Letter of Appeal on November 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010205.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010205.txt
    • Released: January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Pluralistic School (Pluralistic), Santa Monica, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Pluralistic's Letter of Appeal on December 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010206.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010206.txt
    • Decision Letter were wrong and the total pre-discount amount should be changed. On November 17, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Solon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Solon subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010207.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010207.txt
    • for the rest of Funding Year One, i.e. through to June 1999. On May 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider MetroCon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. MetroCon subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010316.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010316.txt
    • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 19, 2000. Because Ashby failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Ashby's Request for Review and its request to waive the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on May 19, 2000. Ashby filed an appeal of the funding decision
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010317.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010317.txt
    • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 1, 2001. See Letter from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010318.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010318.txt
    • 9, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Daingerfield-Lone Star Independent School District (Daingerfield), Daingerfield, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 4, 2000. The Commission received Daingerfield's Request for Review on October 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010319.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010319.txt
    • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Requests for Review filed by Hawthorn School District 73 (Hawthorn), Vernon Hills, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Hawthorn's Request for Review on November 17, 2000 and December 4, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because Hawthorn failed to timely appeal the April 14, 2000 decision to either the Commission or SLD, the Requests for Review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010320.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010320.txt
    • February 9, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Peach Public Libraries (Peach), Fort Valley, Georgia, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 19, 1999. The Commission received Peach's Request for Review on May 7, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010321.doc
    • 2000, Windham filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 390370. On December 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Windham's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Windham subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010324.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010324.txt
    • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Half Hollow Hills School District (Half Hollow), Dix Hills, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 8, 2000. The Commission received Half Hollow's Request for Review on December 22, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010355.txt
    • 2000, Dietrich filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 336896. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Dietrich's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dietrich subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010356.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010356.txt
    • decision did not reflect the funding period that was requested. On May 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Grant County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Grant County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010357.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010357.txt
    • Highway Christian Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 30, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, dated September 29, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Request for Review from Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 30, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010358.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010358.txt
    • discount instead of the requested 80 percent discount. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Pius V's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Pius V subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010373.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010373.txt
    • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 462972, 462973, and 462974. On January 19, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider USD's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. USD subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010463.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010463.txt
    • Commission, filed July 13, 2000 (Request for Review). See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, dated June 30, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 13, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010464.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010464.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Salem County Vocational Technical Schools (Salem County), Woodstown, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on October 31, 2000. The Commission received Salem County's Request for Review on December 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010585.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010585.txt
    • This order addresses Requests for Review filed by the Caddo Parish School Board (Caddo Parish), Shreveport, Louisiana, on November 9, 1999 and November 12, 1999, seeking review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 12, 1999, regarding Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) 216602 and 252147, respectively. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Request for Review regarding FRN 252147 was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010796.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010796.txt
    • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 275740 and 275741. On May 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Little Miami's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Little Miami subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010855.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010855.txt
    • Mass. DOE's argument that it should be excused because it lacked notice regarding the consequences of failing to comply with SLD's document requests is both contrary to the record and unreasonable on its face. Finally, we note that Mass. DOE was not entitled to relief from SLD for the additional reason that its appeal to SLD was untimely. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Here, SLD issued its Funding Commitment Decision Letter on December 15, 1999. Mass. DOE did not file its appeal with
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010891.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010891.txt
    • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 29, 2001. See Letter from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010892.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010892.txt
    • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rome City School District (Rome City), Rome, Georgia, seeking review of two decisions issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on December 8, 2000 and December 22, 2000. The Commission received Rome City's Request for Review on March 14, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010919.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010919.txt
    • WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Bloxam, Ohio SchoolNet Commission, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 22, 2000. Letter from Barbara Bloxam and H. Samuel Orth III, Ohio SchoolNet Commission, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010920.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010920.txt
    • 2001, Lemoore filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 402771. On February 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lemoore's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lemoore subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010921.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010921.txt
    • York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from Joseph Fatuzzo, St. Christopher-Ottilie, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 12, 2001. See Letter from Joseph Fatuzzo, St. Christopher-Ottilie, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 12, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011050.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011050.txt
    • April 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Amherst Independent School District (Amherst), Amherst, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 5, 2001. The Commission received Amherst's Request for Review on March 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011051.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011051.txt
    • 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Harlandale Independent School District (Harlandale), San Antonio, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 2, 2001. The Commission received Harlandale's Request for Review on April 3, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011052.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011052.txt
    • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 405993, 406305, 406330, 406350, and 420208. On March 16, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011053.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011053.txt
    • funding. The Letter of Appeal was dated December 22, 2000. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Montgomery County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Montgomery County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011054.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011054.txt
    • days from the date of public notice of such action. 47 C.F.R. � 1.108; see Request for Review by St. Christopher-Ottilie, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-921 (rel. April 13, 2001). A request for review of an Administrator's decision must be filed within thirty days of the date of the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1054 % q r q q
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011055.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011055.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 327849. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider District 4's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. School Administrative subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011056.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011056.txt
    • April 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Tyrone Area School District (Tyrone), Tyrone, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 26, 2001. The Commission received Tyrone's Request for Review on March 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011117.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011117.txt
    • service line and therefore, Qwest could not give them discounted internal connections. On March 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Calhan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Calhan subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011165.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011165.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 423676. On March 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider North Babylon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. North Babylon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011179.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011179.txt
    • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Beth Chana Elementary and High School for Girls (Beth Chana), Brooklyn, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2001. The Commission received Beth Chana's Request for Review on April 24, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011180.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011180.txt
    • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Ellenville Central School District (Ellenville), Ellenville, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 15, 2000 and a waiver of our appeal rules. The Commission received Ellenville's Request for Review on February 12, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Ellenville asserts that it did not receive the June 15, 2000 decision letter and became aware of the decision on January 24, 2001
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011181.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011181.txt
    • 2, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, dated February 23, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letter). Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 26, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011182.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011182.txt
    • District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 20, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, dated March 23, 2001 (Year 2 Application Return Letter). Request for Review from James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 17, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011230.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011230.txt
    • from Jackie Johnson, Esoft, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 27, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Waburn Martin, Esoft, Inc., dated February 23, 2001 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Request for Review from Jackie Johnson, Esoft, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 20, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011248.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011248.txt
    • School for Children, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 23, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, dated March 23, 2001. Request for Review from Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 23, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011249.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011249.txt
    • to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated May 8, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dean Werstler, Olmstead Falls City Schools, dated August 7, 2000. Letter from William R. Schuck, Olmstead Falls City Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated January 18, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011294.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011294.txt
    • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Ocean Beach School District No. 101 (Ocean Beach), Long Beach, Washington, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 13, 2000. The Commission received Ocean Beach's Request for Review on April 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. Ocean Beach
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011295.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011295.txt
    • entity information. On June 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider NJ State Library's appeal requesting a billed entity information change because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. NJ State Library subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011352.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011352.txt
    • 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by First Baptist Academy (First Baptist), Universal City, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 16, 2001. The Commission received First Baptist's Request for Review on May 18, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011361.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011361.txt
    • Released: June 7, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Project Interconnect, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 28, 2000. The Commission received Project Interconnect's Request for Review on December 29, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011398.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011398.txt
    • Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 31, 2001. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, dated January 5, 2001 (Commitment Adjustment Letter). See Letter from Letter from Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 30, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011399.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011399.txt
    • 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ONC's March 26, 2001 appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 5, 2000 Administrator Letter rejecting ONC's application for failure to meet Minimum Processing Standards was issued. ONC subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011404.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 372633. On May 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bnos Zion's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bnos Zion subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011507.txt
    • (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 20, 2000. Because Chabad failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Chabad's Request for Waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on October 20, 2000. Chabad filed an appeal of the funding decision
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011511.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011511.txt
    • this decision to SLD, and to the Commission on April 2, 2001. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of SLD decisions do not permit applicants to seek reconsideration of the Administrator's decision from the Administrator. The Commission received Northern Berkshire's Request for Review on April 2, 2001 seeking review of a decision issued by SLD on February 23, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Northern Berkshire's Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011512.txt
    • 4." On April 26, 2001, Petoskey filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On May 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Petoskey's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Petoskey subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011559.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011559.txt
    • decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on July 19, 2000 which rejected St. Mary's FCC Form 471, Services Ordered and Certification Form, because it was submitted after the close of the 30-day filing deadline for Funding Year 2 . The Commission received St. Mary's Request for Review on August 31, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011560.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011560.txt
    • College (West Shore), Scottville, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 15, 2000 to deny West Shore payment of an invoice it submitted for services it provided to Mason County District Library, Ludington, Michigan. The Commission received West Shore's Request for Review on June 20, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011571.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011571.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by New Kensington-Arnold School District (New Kensington-Arnold), New Kensington, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2001. The Commission received New Kensington-Arnold's Request for Review on June 19, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011572.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011572.txt
    • July 6, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Sampson-Clinton Public Library (Sampson-Clinton), Clinton, North Carolina, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 25, 2001. The Commission received Sampson-Clinton's Request for Review on June 27, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011573.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011573.txt
    • and became aware of the decision only after having contacted SLD. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on June 30, 2000. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011625.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011625.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Saint Thomas Aquinas School (Saint Thomas Aquinas), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 15, 2000. The Commission received Saint Thomas Aquinas's Request for Review on April 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011697.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011697.txt
    • 30 days after the Minimum Processing Standards Letter was issued. In their Request for Review, Praxis asserts that they did not receive the Minimum Processing Standards Letter until almost a month after the letter was dated. Praxis provides a copy of the postmark of the Minimum Processing Standards Letter, indicating the letter was issued on August 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011698.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011698.txt
    • 2001 Released: July 17, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rice Independent School District (Rice Independent), Rice, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division. The Commission received Rice Independent's Request for Review on June 1, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011699.txt
    • 2001 Released: July 17, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Scott County School District (Scott County), Forest, Mississippi, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division. The Commission received Scott County's Request for Review on May 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011701.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011701.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 381559. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Yeshivas Boyan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Yeshivas Boyan subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011718.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011718.txt
    • which challenged SLD's decision to deny FRNs 476986, 476987, 476988, and 476993. On May 30, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Pomona's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Pomona subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011724.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011724.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c). Copan Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 5501, para. 6. LA Unified Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3496, para. 9. Id. Id. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any party aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. See Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Lac du Flambeau Public School, filed July 28, 2000. See Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Kingsport City Schools, filed July 31, 2000; Requests for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Lee County School District filed, June 8, 2000 and
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011806.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011806.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Bristol Bay Borough School District (Bristol Bay), Naknek, Alaska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division issued on May 4, 2001. The Commission received Bristol Bay's Request for Review on July 6, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011822.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011822.txt
    • the record indicates that SLD did issue a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 21, 2000 and mailed it to the address provided by Salem on its FCC Form 471. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for relief. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011823.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011823.txt
    • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by the Washington Parish School District (Washington Parish), Franklinton, Louisiana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 21, 2001. The Commission received Washington Parish's Request for Review on March 26, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011824.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011824.txt
    • Released: August 1, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Zeeland Public Schools (Zeeland), Zeeland, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 29, 2001. The Commission received Zeeland's Request for Review on May 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011827.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011827.txt
    • 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to David Boison, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, dated March 22, 2001. Id. Letter from R. Brian Johnson, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 6, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to David Boison, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, dated
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011878.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011878.txt
    • 2000, Gallatin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 383557. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gallatin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gallatin subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011879.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011879.txt
    • of the district's vendors indicating that a decision had been made. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on July 21, 2000. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011883.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011883.txt
    • See 47 C.F.R. � 1.113 (permitting actions taken on delegated authority to be reconsidered within 30 days of the public notice of the action). Remand Order, paras. 8-9. Id., para. 8; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rick Barber, Mercer County Area Vocational-Technical School, dated May 12, 2000 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720; see, e.g., Request for Review by North Babylon Union Free School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-160553, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-1165 (Act. Pol. Div. rel. May 9, 2001). Letter from Rick Barber, Mercer County Area Vocational-Technical School, to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011900.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011900.txt
    • processed. On January 8, 2001, Monessen filed three appeals of SLD's decision. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued three Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Monessen's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Monessen subsequently filed the instant Requests for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011943.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011943.txt
    • Bureau Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., dated July 5, 2001. Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 31, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011972.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011972.txt
    • 23, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Fairland Public School District I-31 (Fairland), Fairland, Oklahoma, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 13, 2001. The Commission received Fairland's Request for Review on August 15, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011973.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011973.txt
    • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by New Plymouth School District No. 372 (New Plymouth), New Plymouth, Idaho, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 18, 2001. The Commission received New Plymouth's Request for Review on February 20, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011976.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011976.txt
    • Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 6, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, dated July 23, 2001. Request for Review from Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 6, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012038.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012038.txt
    • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by East Greenbush Central Schools (East Greenbush), East Greenbush, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 13, 2001. The Commission received East Greenbush's Request for Review on August 15, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012086.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012086.txt
    • School, Baltimore, Marlyand, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 25, 2000. See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated July 24, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012098.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012098.txt
    • Federal Communications Commission, filed August 24, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, dated July 23, 2001. Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 23, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012129.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012129.txt
    • 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review of the Congregation Bnos Yaakov (Bnos Yaakov), Lakewood, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 18, 2000. The Commission received Bnos Yaakov's Request for Review on September 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. A review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012130.txt
    • 2001, DeKalb filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 698159. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider DeKalb's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. DeKalb subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012131.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012131.txt
    • 2001, Estelline filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 305555. On August 3, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Estelline's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Estelline subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.txt
    • asks us to ensure that sufficient funds will be available should these appeals be successful by authorizing SLD to apply any Funding Year 1 committed funds that went unused to the funding of successful Funding Year 1 appeals if necessary. For the reasons discussed below, we deny part of the Request for Waiver, and dismiss the remaining part. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any party seeking review of a decision issued by the Administrator must file its request with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. E-Rate Central is an educational services company that
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012226.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012226.txt
    • Released: September 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by City of Cameron (Cameron), Cameron, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Cameron's Request for Review on September 11, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012227.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012227.txt
    • 2001, Sealy filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 613865. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Sealy's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Sealy subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012228.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012228.txt
    • 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Shelby City Schools (Shelby City), Shelby, Ohio, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Shelby City's Request for Review on September 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012229.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012229.txt
    • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 509467. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Cecelia's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Cecelia subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012275.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012275.txt
    • 24, 2001, Sacred Heart filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Sacred Heart's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Sacred Heart subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012329.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012329.txt
    • decision to treat Mississippi DOE's September 13, 1999 appeal as untimely filed. On March 20, 2000, SLD issued another letter stating that Mississippi DOE's October 18, 1999 appeal was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters and thus would not be considered. Mississippi DOE subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012362.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012362.txt
    • 2000 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2000. See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 28, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012398.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012398.txt
    • 28, 2001, Belt Schools filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On September 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Belt Schools' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Belt Schools subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012400.txt
    • Released: October 16, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Hazelwood School District (Hazelwood), Florissant, Missouri, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 27, 2001. The Commission received Hazelwood's Request for Review on September 28, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110511.html
    • Kenneth.Lewis@fcc.gov. News Media Contact: Janice Wise at (202) 418-8165 [58]DA-11-854A1.doc [59]DA-11-854A1.pdf [60]DA-11-854A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SPEECHES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PREPARED REMARKS OF CHAIRMAN JULIUS GENACHOWSKI, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, PERSONAL LOCALIZED ALERTING NETWORK LAUNCH EVENT, NEW YORK, NY. OCHJG [61]DOC-306425A1.doc [62]DOC-306425A1.pdf [63]DOC-306425A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SACRED HEART SCHOOL, SHAWANO, WISCONSIN, SCHOOL AND LIBRARIES UNIVERSAL SERVICE SUPPORT MECHANISM. Waived sections 54.507(c) and 54.720(c) of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 02-6 ). Action by: Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 05/10/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-820). WCB [64]DA-11-820A1.doc [65]DA-11-820A1.pdf [66]DA-11-820A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306444A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306444A1.txt 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306445A1.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306445A1.txt 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306414A1.pdf 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306414A2.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306413A1.pdf 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306413A2.txt 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306416A1.pdf 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306416A1.txt 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306422A1.pdf 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306422A1.txt 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306423A1.pdf 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306423A1.txt 15.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1270A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1270A1.pdf
    • Association, Inc., Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 15 FCC Rcd 22975 (2001) (Commitment Adjustment Implementation Order) (the Commission established procedures for implementing commitment adjustment recovery actions). See Mastermind Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 4032-4033, para. 10 (concluding that a competitive bidding violation occurred despite the lack of a specific rule addressing the facts at issue). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F. 2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 07-1270 07-1270 p q � � h
    • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1811A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1811A1.pdf
      • (1964), aff'd sub. nom. Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967 (1966). Petition at 1. Id. Id. AM Auction Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 10566; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3568(a)(1) and Green Valley Broadcasters, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 13341, 13345-46 (2004) See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.txt
      • Blessed Sacrament School, Washington, DC, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Schools and Libraries Corporation, filed April 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.txt
      • or Administrator) on November 2, 1999. Because Brevard County failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Brevard County's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on November 2, 1999. The instant Letter of Appeal was filed with
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.txt
      • 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Calallen Independent School District (Calallen), Corpus Christi, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 1, 1999. The Commission received Calallen's Letter of Appeal on February 29, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.txt
      • 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Casa Grande Union High School (Casa Grande), Casa Grande, Arizona, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 21, 1999. The Commission received Casa Grande's Letter of Appeal on February 23, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.txt
      • 13, 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Covina-Valley Unified School District (Covina-Valley), Covina, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 17, 2000. The Commission received Covina-Valley's Letter of Appeal on March 27, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.txt
      • June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Enlarged City School District of Troy (Troy), Troy, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 19, 2000. The Commission received Troy's Letter of Appeal on February 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.txt
      • Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Kerkhoven-Murdock-Sunburg Independent School District No. 775 (Kerkhoven), Kerkhoven, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Kerkhoven's Letter of Appeal on May 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.txt
      • 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by the Milwaukee Jewish Day School (MJDS), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 17, 1999. The Commission received MJDS's Letter of Appeal on December 14, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.txt
      • issue here is dated February 16, 2000, but North Chicago has provided a postmark indicating that the letter was not actually issued until March 20, 2000. SLD has confirmed this error. See Letter from Tyrone Pipkin, North Chicago Community Unit School District #187, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 23, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2264A1.pdf
      • change its mode of network delivery from wireless to wireline. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Carl Schurz's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Carl Schurz subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2265A1.pdf
      • 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Central Agency for Jewish Education (CAJE), Miami, Florida, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received CAJE's Letter of Appeal on May 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2266A1.pdf
      • October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Clifton Independent School District (Clifton), Clifton, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 31, 2000. The Commission received Clifton's Letter of Appeal on May 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2267A1.pdf
      • 2000, Colonial filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 400998. On May 22, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colonial's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colonial subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2268A1.pdf
      • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 374012 and 384961. On June 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Eastern Plains' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Eastern Plains subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2269A1.pdf
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 420899. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Garden Grove's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Garden Grove subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2270A1.pdf
      • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Judge Memorial Catholic High School (Judge Memorial County), Salt Lake City, Utah, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 13, 2000. The Commission received Judge Memorial County's Letter of Appeal on April 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2271A1.pdf
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 458464. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Kanawha County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Kanawha County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2272A1.pdf
      • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Marion School District 54 (Marion County), Marion, Montana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Marion County's Letter of Appeal on September 18, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2273A1.pdf
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its requests for discounts. On July 13, 2000, SLD issued four Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Newburgh's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Newburgh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2274A1.pdf
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 305643. On June 8, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Castle's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. New Castle subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2275A1.pdf
      • SLD's decisions, stating that it did not receive the full amount requested. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Oscoda's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Oscoda subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2276A1.pdf
      • October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Pace School (Pace County), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 1, 2000. The Commission received Pace County's Letter of Appeal on June 2, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Tim O'Leary, Pinckneyville District #50, dated July 20, 1999 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Sue Andrews, Pinckneyville District #50, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 20, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Pinckneyville's Letter of Appeal seeks review of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued on July 20, 1999. Prior to filing this appeal with the Commission, however, Pinckneyville filed an appeal with SLD. See Letter from Tim O'Leary, Pinckneyville District #50, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed August 16, 1999. SLD issued an
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.txt
      • 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Racine Unified School District (Racine) of Racine, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 24, 2000. The Commission received Racine's Letter of Appeal on June 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.txt
      • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 399446 and 399610. On June 22, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Saint Andrew's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Saint Andrew subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2280A1.pdf
      • requests for discounts that had not been considered by SLD. On May 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider San Juan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. San Juan subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2281A1.pdf
      • Plains filed appeals of SLD's decisions denying SLD-192955 and SLD-194558. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Scotch Plains' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Scotch Plains subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.txt
      • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library, to Federal Communications Commission (filed August 8, 2000). See Letter from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated August 1, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 431274 and 431275. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ballinger's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ballinger subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 359338. On July 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Big Rapids' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Big Rapids subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.txt
      • Caledonia North filed appeals of SLD's decisions to deny funding. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued four Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Caledonia North's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Caledonia North subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.txt
      • 22, 1999, Douglas filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 22, 1999, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Douglas' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Douglas subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.txt
      • 26, 1999 (SLD-146388); Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, dated November 2, 1999 (SLD-147484) (Funding Commitment Decision Letters). Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr. and L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 19, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Egg Harbor's Letter of Appeal seeks review of the Funding Commitment Decision Letters issued on August 10, 1999, October 26, 1999, and November 2, 1999. Prior to filing this appeal with the Commission, however, Egg Harbor filed appeals with SLD. See Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr. and L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.txt
      • 2000, Elgin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 453138. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Elgin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Elgin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 414873. On July 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Holy Family's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Holy Family subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.txt
      • 2000, Jefferson filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 365086. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.txt
      • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 275030, 275032, 275038, 275041, and 275044. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.txt
      • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 384448, 384485, and 384520. On July 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Granite's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Granite subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.txt
      • Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lexington Public Schools (Lexington), Lexington, Nebraska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 6, 2000. The Commission received Lexington's Letter of Appeal on August 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 386438. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mt. Diablo's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mt. Diablo subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.txt
      • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Oregon Trail School District (Oregon Trail), Sandy, Oregon, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Oregon Trail's Letter of Appeal on August 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.txt
      • 2000, Southeastern filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 381559. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Southeastern's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Southeastern subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.txt
      • 2000, Southwick-Tolland filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 390427. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Southwick-Tolland's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Southwick-Tolland subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 408616. On July 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Anthony's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Anthony subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 476279. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Rita's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Rita subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.txt
      • 2000 Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Yeshiva Schools (Yeshiva), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 2000. The Commission received Yeshiva's Letter of Appeal on August 30, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.txt
      • 2000, Austin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 400580. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Austin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Austin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.txt
      • 2000, Bloomfield filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 431262. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bloomfield's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bloomfield subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.txt
      • 2000, Cumberland filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 348856. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Cumberland's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Cumberland subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Eastern Plains Instructional Television Consortium (Eastern Plains), Logan, New Mexico, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 9, 2000. The Commission received Eastern Plains' Letter of Appeal on April 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.txt
      • discounts to services that were not requested in its application. On July 6, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Florence Carlton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Florence Carlton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its request for funding. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Florence's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Florence subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School District 156, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 8, 2000. See Letter from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School District 156, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed May 4, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 396144. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Moon Area's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Moon Area subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 434670. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider North Attleborough's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. North Attleborough subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.txt
      • 2000, Gildford filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 312153. On June 2, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gildford's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gildford subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.txt
      • 31, 2000, Roosevelt Elementary filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Roosevelt Elementary's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Roosevelt Elementary subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kay Berry, Simpson County School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed June 23, 2000). See Letter from Jack M. McAlpin, Simpson County School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 2, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 421231. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider South Heart's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. South Heart subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.txt
      • stating that it should have received additional funding. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Peter & Paul's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Peter & Paul subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.txt
      • Patrick's filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Patrick's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Patrick subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 321400. On July 6, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Swift River's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Swift River subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.txt
      • 2000, Vacaville filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 395593. On July 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Vacaville's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Vacaville subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.txt
      • 2000, AECSD filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 404676. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider AECSD's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. AECSD subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.txt
      • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 346232 and 346283. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Chisago Lakes' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Chisago Lakes subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.txt
      • 2000, Colton filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 424483. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.txt
      • 2000, Durham filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 367094. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Durham's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Durham subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.txt
      • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Elko County School District (Elko County), Elko, Nevada, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Elko County's Letter of Appeal on July 20, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.txt
      • 2000, Girard filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 324273. On July 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Girard's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Girard subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.txt
      • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 435901, 435905, and 458591. On August 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider McIntosh's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. McIntosh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.txt
      • 13, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative (Northeast), Hayti, South Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 2, 2000. The Commission received Northeast's Letter of Appeal on July 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.txt
      • 357508 due to SLD's conclusion that the funding request included ineligible services. On July 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ryan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ryan subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Traverse City Area Public Schools (Traverse City), Traverse City, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Traverse City's Letter of Appeal on July 11, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.txt
      • 2000, Xavier filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 418165. On August 9, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Xavier's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Xavier subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.txt
      • SLD's decision to deny FRNs 198760 and 198761. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ESU No. 6's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. ESU No. 6 subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2575A1.pdf
      • for the period between January 1999 to June 1999. On August 12, 1999 and August 7, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Delta/Greely's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Delta/Greely subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.txt
      • 18, 2000, Houston Independent filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On July 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Houston Independent's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Houston Independent subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 324467. On September 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bryn Athyn's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bryn Athyn subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.txt
      • 8, 2000, EDmin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On September 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider EDmin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. EDmin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.txt
      • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by James Ward Elementary School (James Ward), Chicago, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 2, 2000. The Commission received James Ward's Letter of Appeal on September 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.txt
      • 7, 2000, Madera filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On September 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Madera's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Madera subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.txt
      • Released: November 29, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Norwell Public Schools (Norwell), Norwell, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 10, 2000. The Commission received Norwell's Letter of Appeal on September 11, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.txt
      • to approve its funding at a lower amount than requested. On August 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Richland Colfax's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Richland Colfax subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.txt
      • not receive the amount requested for Funding Request Number 397275. On August 17, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Rosa's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Rosa subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.txt
      • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 366305 and 366344. On August 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Ynez's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Ynez subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.txt
      • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint John Bosco High School (Saint John Bosco), Bellflower, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 2, 2000. The Commission received Saint John Bosco's Letter of Appeal on September 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.txt
      • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by South Brunswick Township School District (South Brunswick Township), Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 23, 2000. The Commission received South Brunswick Township's Letter of Appeal on June 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.txt
      • Released: November 29, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Westbrook High School (Westbrook), Westbrook, Connecticut, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 17, 2000. The Commission received Westbrook's Letter of Appeal on October 2, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.txt
      • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 28, 2000. Because Northwestern failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Northwestern's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on July 28, 2000. Northwestern filed an appeal of the funding decision
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.txt
      • two appeals of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 429028, 431862, and 431875. On August 29, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Western Heights' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Western Heights subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2785A1.txt
      • from the date of public notice of such action. 47 C.F.R. � 1.108. Request for Review by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 00-2555 (rel. November 13, 2000). A request for review of an Administrator's decision must be filed within thirty days of the date of the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). 3 b c � � � � � � � " � � � � � � � � � � 0 1 2 3 b � � � � � � � � � � � 0 1 2 3 � � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.txt
      • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 369592, 369658, and 369691. On August 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Soille San Diego's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Soille San Diego subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.txt
      • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lyman School District No. 42-1 (Lyman), Presho, South Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 2000. The Commission received Lyman's Letter of Appeal on September 6, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.txt
      • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: January 10, 2000 Released: January 11, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Denison Independent School District of Denison, Texas that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 11, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.txt
      • April 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Amherst Independent School District (Amherst), Amherst, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 5, 2001. The Commission received Amherst's Request for Review on March 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.txt
      • 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Harlandale Independent School District (Harlandale), San Antonio, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 2, 2001. The Commission received Harlandale's Request for Review on April 3, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.txt
      • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 405993, 406305, 406330, 406350, and 420208. On March 16, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.txt
      • funding. The Letter of Appeal was dated December 22, 2000. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Montgomery County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Montgomery County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1054A1.txt
      • days from the date of public notice of such action. 47 C.F.R. � 1.108; see Request for Review by St. Christopher-Ottilie, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-921 (rel. April 13, 2001). A request for review of an Administrator's decision must be filed within thirty days of the date of the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1054 % q r q q
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 327849. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider District 4's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. School Administrative subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.txt
      • April 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Tyrone Area School District (Tyrone), Tyrone, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 26, 2001. The Commission received Tyrone's Request for Review on March 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.txt
      • service line and therefore, Qwest could not give them discounted internal connections. On March 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Calhan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Calhan subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 423676. On March 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider North Babylon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. North Babylon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.txt
      • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Beth Chana Elementary and High School for Girls (Beth Chana), Brooklyn, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2001. The Commission received Beth Chana's Request for Review on April 24, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.txt
      • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Ellenville Central School District (Ellenville), Ellenville, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 15, 2000 and a waiver of our appeal rules. The Commission received Ellenville's Request for Review on February 12, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Ellenville asserts that it did not receive the June 15, 2000 decision letter and became aware of the decision on January 24, 2001
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.txt
      • 2, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, dated February 23, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letter). Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 26, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.txt
      • District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 20, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, dated March 23, 2001 (Year 2 Application Return Letter). Request for Review from James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 17, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.txt
      • School for Children, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 23, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, dated March 23, 2001. Request for Review from Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 23, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.txt
      • to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated May 8, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dean Werstler, Olmstead Falls City Schools, dated August 7, 2000. Letter from William R. Schuck, Olmstead Falls City Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated January 18, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.txt
      • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Ocean Beach School District No. 101 (Ocean Beach), Long Beach, Washington, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 13, 2000. The Commission received Ocean Beach's Request for Review on April 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. Ocean Beach
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.txt
      • entity information. On June 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider NJ State Library's appeal requesting a billed entity information change because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. NJ State Library subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.txt
      • Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 31, 2001. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, dated January 5, 2001 (Commitment Adjustment Letter). See Letter from Letter from Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 30, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.txt
      • 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ONC's March 26, 2001 appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 5, 2000 Administrator Letter rejecting ONC's application for failure to meet Minimum Processing Standards was issued. ONC subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 372633. On May 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bnos Zion's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bnos Zion subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 13, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed November 6, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.txt
      • appeal of the funding decision with SLD on June 15, 2000. SLD dismissed the appeal as untimely. Newburgh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal. Because Newburgh failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within thirty days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it filed a supplemental request for waiver of the 30-day appeal period on September 19, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline applies to all requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.txt
      • 23, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Sutton School, CNSU (Sutton County), Lyndonville, Vermont, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 17, 2000. The Commission received Sutton County's Letter of Appeal on November 9, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.txt
      • (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 20, 2000. Because Chabad failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Chabad's Request for Waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on October 20, 2000. Chabad filed an appeal of the funding decision
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1511A1.txt
      • this decision to SLD, and to the Commission on April 2, 2001. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of SLD decisions do not permit applicants to seek reconsideration of the Administrator's decision from the Administrator. The Commission received Northern Berkshire's Request for Review on April 2, 2001 seeking review of a decision issued by SLD on February 23, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Northern Berkshire's Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.txt
      • 4." On April 26, 2001, Petoskey filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On May 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Petoskey's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Petoskey subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.txt
      • decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on July 19, 2000 which rejected St. Mary's FCC Form 471, Services Ordered and Certification Form, because it was submitted after the close of the 30-day filing deadline for Funding Year 2 . The Commission received St. Mary's Request for Review on August 31, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.txt
      • College (West Shore), Scottville, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 15, 2000 to deny West Shore payment of an invoice it submitted for services it provided to Mason County District Library, Ludington, Michigan. The Commission received West Shore's Request for Review on June 20, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.txt
      • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by New Kensington-Arnold School District (New Kensington-Arnold), New Kensington, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2001. The Commission received New Kensington-Arnold's Request for Review on June 19, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.txt
      • July 6, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Sampson-Clinton Public Library (Sampson-Clinton), Clinton, North Carolina, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 25, 2001. The Commission received Sampson-Clinton's Request for Review on June 27, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.txt
      • and became aware of the decision only after having contacted SLD. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on June 30, 2000. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Saint Thomas Aquinas School (Saint Thomas Aquinas), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 15, 2000. The Commission received Saint Thomas Aquinas's Request for Review on April 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.txt
      • 30 days after the Minimum Processing Standards Letter was issued. In their Request for Review, Praxis asserts that they did not receive the Minimum Processing Standards Letter until almost a month after the letter was dated. Praxis provides a copy of the postmark of the Minimum Processing Standards Letter, indicating the letter was issued on August 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.txt
      • 2001 Released: July 17, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rice Independent School District (Rice Independent), Rice, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division. The Commission received Rice Independent's Request for Review on June 1, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.txt
      • 2001 Released: July 17, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Scott County School District (Scott County), Forest, Mississippi, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division. The Commission received Scott County's Request for Review on May 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 381559. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Yeshivas Boyan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Yeshivas Boyan subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.txt
      • which challenged SLD's decision to deny FRNs 476986, 476987, 476988, and 476993. On May 30, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Pomona's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Pomona subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1724A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1724A1.txt
      • 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c). Copan Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 5501, para. 6. LA Unified Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3496, para. 9. Id. Id. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any party aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. See Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Lac du Flambeau Public School, filed July 28, 2000. See Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Kingsport City Schools, filed July 31, 2000; Requests for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Lee County School District filed, June 8, 2000 and
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.txt
      • Decision Letter approving East Side Union's request for funding for internal connections. East Side Union filed appeals of the funding decision with SLD on December 8, 1999 and January 5, 2000. SLD dismissed the appeals as untimely. East Side Union subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal and request for waiver of the 30-day deadline for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline applies to all requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Bristol Bay Borough School District (Bristol Bay), Naknek, Alaska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division issued on May 4, 2001. The Commission received Bristol Bay's Request for Review on July 6, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.txt
      • the record indicates that SLD did issue a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 21, 2000 and mailed it to the address provided by Salem on its FCC Form 471. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for relief. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.txt
      • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by the Washington Parish School District (Washington Parish), Franklinton, Louisiana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 21, 2001. The Commission received Washington Parish's Request for Review on March 26, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.txt
      • Released: August 1, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Zeeland Public Schools (Zeeland), Zeeland, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 29, 2001. The Commission received Zeeland's Request for Review on May 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.txt
      • 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to David Boison, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, dated March 22, 2001. Id. Letter from R. Brian Johnson, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 6, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to David Boison, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, dated
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.txt
      • 2000, Gallatin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 383557. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gallatin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gallatin subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.txt
      • of the district's vendors indicating that a decision had been made. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on July 21, 2000. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.txt
      • See 47 C.F.R. � 1.113 (permitting actions taken on delegated authority to be reconsidered within 30 days of the public notice of the action). Remand Order, paras. 8-9. Id., para. 8; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rick Barber, Mercer County Area Vocational-Technical School, dated May 12, 2000 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720; see, e.g., Request for Review by North Babylon Union Free School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-160553, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-1165 (Act. Pol. Div. rel. May 9, 2001). Letter from Rick Barber, Mercer County Area Vocational-Technical School, to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.txt
      • processed. On January 8, 2001, Monessen filed three appeals of SLD's decision. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued three Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Monessen's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Monessen subsequently filed the instant Requests for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.txt
      • Bureau Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., dated July 5, 2001. Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 31, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.txt
      • 23, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Fairland Public School District I-31 (Fairland), Fairland, Oklahoma, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 13, 2001. The Commission received Fairland's Request for Review on August 15, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.txt
      • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by New Plymouth School District No. 372 (New Plymouth), New Plymouth, Idaho, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 18, 2001. The Commission received New Plymouth's Request for Review on February 20, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.txt
      • Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 6, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, dated July 23, 2001. Request for Review from Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 6, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 333195. On November 28, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Atlantic County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Atlantic County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.txt
      • 2000, Clearview filed an appeal requesting additional funding for Funding Year 3. On November 28, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Clearview's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Clearview subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.txt
      • January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Granville Public Schools (Granville), Granville, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 18, 2000. The Commission received Granville's Letter of Appeal on December 12, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by East Greenbush Central Schools (East Greenbush), East Greenbush, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 13, 2001. The Commission received East Greenbush's Request for Review on August 15, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, dated June 9, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 20, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Leon County's Letter of Appeal seeks review of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued on June 9, 2000. At the same time Leon County filed this appeal with the Commission, Leon County also filed an appeal with SLD. See Letter from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Levittown Union Free School District (Levittown Union), Levittown, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 10, 2000. The Commission received Levittown Union's Letter of Appeal on November 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.txt
      • Released: January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Pluralistic School (Pluralistic), Santa Monica, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Pluralistic's Letter of Appeal on December 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.txt
      • Decision Letter were wrong and the total pre-discount amount should be changed. On November 17, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Solon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Solon subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.txt
      • for the rest of Funding Year One, i.e. through to June 1999. On May 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider MetroCon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. MetroCon subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.txt
      • School, Baltimore, Marlyand, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 25, 2000. See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated July 24, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.txt
      • Federal Communications Commission, filed August 24, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, dated July 23, 2001. Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 23, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.txt
      • 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review of the Congregation Bnos Yaakov (Bnos Yaakov), Lakewood, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 18, 2000. The Commission received Bnos Yaakov's Request for Review on September 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. A review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.txt
      • 2001, DeKalb filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 698159. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider DeKalb's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. DeKalb subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.txt
      • 2001, Estelline filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 305555. On August 3, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Estelline's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Estelline subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.txt
      • asks us to ensure that sufficient funds will be available should these appeals be successful by authorizing SLD to apply any Funding Year 1 committed funds that went unused to the funding of successful Funding Year 1 appeals if necessary. For the reasons discussed below, we deny part of the Request for Waiver, and dismiss the remaining part. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any party seeking review of a decision issued by the Administrator must file its request with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. E-Rate Central is an educational services company that
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.txt
      • Released: September 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by City of Cameron (Cameron), Cameron, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Cameron's Request for Review on September 11, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.txt
      • 2001, Sealy filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 613865. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Sealy's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Sealy subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.txt
      • 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Shelby City Schools (Shelby City), Shelby, Ohio, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Shelby City's Request for Review on September 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 509467. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Cecelia's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Cecelia subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.txt
      • 24, 2001, Sacred Heart filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Sacred Heart's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Sacred Heart subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.txt
      • SLD's decision to deny FRN 501079. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Francis de Sales' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Francis de Sales subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, a party must file its appeal with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision it seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to any requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.txt
      • decision to treat Mississippi DOE's September 13, 1999 appeal as untimely filed. On March 20, 2000, SLD issued another letter stating that Mississippi DOE's October 18, 1999 appeal was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters and thus would not be considered. Mississippi DOE subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.txt
      • 2000 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2000. See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 28, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.txt
      • 28, 2001, Belt Schools filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On September 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Belt Schools' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Belt Schools subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.txt
      • Released: October 16, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Hazelwood School District (Hazelwood), Florissant, Missouri, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 27, 2001. The Commission received Hazelwood's Request for Review on September 28, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.txt
      • 2001, Elizabeth filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 551356. On September 10, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Elizabeth's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Elizabeth subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.txt
      • Company, to William D. Piotrowski, Sabal Palm Elementary School, dated July 16, 2001; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to William D. Piotrowski, Wesson Elementary School, dated July 16, 2001. Request for Review from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 27, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.txt
      • applicant. On August 24, 2001, Mid-Peninsula filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mid-Peninsula's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mid-Peninsula subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.txt
      • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Deep River-Millersburg Community School District (Deep River-Millersburg), Millersburg, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 27, 2001. The Commission received Deep River-Millersburg's Request for Review on October 9, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 684292 and 684293. On August 31, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider McClave's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. McClave subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.txt
      • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 553491 and 553492. On September 10, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Saint Patrick's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Saint Patrick subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 443629 and 443634. On September 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Columbia's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Columbia subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.txt
      • Released: October 31, 2001 By the Common Carrier Bureau, Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rochester Public Schools (Rochester), Rochester, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 13, 2001. The Commission received Rochester's Request for Review on September 17, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.txt
      • 2. See supra note 1. Letter from Chris Rosenthal, St. Mary Magdalen, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 12, 1999 (relating to April FCC Form 471); Letter from Chris Rosenthal, St. Mary Magdalen, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 12, 1999 (relating to October FCC Form 471). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2521 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2521 � - - � - . / 0 1
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.txt
      • Crowe, Paso Robles Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 20, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Peggy Edwards, Paso Robles Public Schools, dated July 26, 2001. Request for Review from Laurie Crowe, Paso Robles Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 20, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.txt
      • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lake Havasu Unified School District (Lake Havasu), Lake Havasu City, Arizona, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 25, 2000. The Commission received Lake Havasu's Letter of Appeal on October 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.txt
      • this Request for Review was filed. The proffered letter without more, is insufficient to demonstrate that an appeal was filed with SLD. We find no reason to depart from this finding in the instant case. It is well established law that the absence of official record of an event is the evidence of the non-occurrence of the event. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.txt
      • 2001, Whitehall filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 303830. On August 3, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Whitehall's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Whitehall subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.txt
      • the correct form and by which Lakeshore resubmitted a correct FCC Form 471. On September 24, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lakeshore's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Rejection Letter was issued. Lakeshore subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.txt
      • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 654207 and 655521. On August 24, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mary O'Brien's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mary O'Brien subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.txt
      • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Max Rowland, Wapanucka Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 24, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Max Rowland, Wapanucka Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 13, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.txt
      • that it was rejected for lack of an original ink signature. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bais Yaakov's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Rejection Letter was issued. Bais Yaakov subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.txt
      • call if its submission of missing information from its Form 471 was incorrect. On September 10, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Louisville's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Rejection Letter was issued. Louisville subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.txt
      • 2000, Northeastern filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 397733. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Northeastern's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Northeastern subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.txt
      • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by St. Raymond Regional School (St. Raymond), Villas, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on June 20, 2000. The Commission received St. Raymond's Request for Review on October 3, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Scott Garrigan, Bethlehem Area School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 15, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Scott Garrigan, Bethlehem Area School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 2, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.txt
      • Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator) on July 23, 2001. Because Lincoln's appeal to SLD regarding the funding decision was not filed within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Lincoln's Request for Review and its Request for Waiver. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted above, SLD issued the Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 23, 2001. Lincoln filed an appeal of the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.txt
      • (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator) on June 23, 2000. Because Pinellas failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Pinellas's Request for Review and its Request for Waiver. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on June 23, 2000. Pinellas filed an appeal of the funding decision with SLD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.txt
      • (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 23, 2001. Because Potter Valley failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Potter Valley's Request for Review and its Request for Waiver. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted above, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 23, 2001. Potter Valley filed an appeal of
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.txt
      • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Somerton School District No. 11 (Somerton), Somerton, Arizona. Somerton seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 18, 2000. The Commission received Somerton's Request for Review on June 22, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.txt
      • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Somerton School District No. 11 (Somerton), Somerton, Arizona. Somerton seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on April 13, 2000. The Commission received Somerton's Request for Review on June 12, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.txt
      • 2000, Lakeview filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 409295. On November 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lakeview's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lakeview subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Washington Community School District (Washington Community), Washington, Iowa. Washington Community seeks review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 22, 2001. The Commission received Washington Community's Request for Review on September 24, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.txt
      • Review filed by Prospect School District 59 (Prospect), Prospect, Oregon, on October 2, 2000. In the Request for Review, Prospect seeks review of a funding commitment decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 26, 2000. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Prospect's Request for Review. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted above, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on May 26, 2000. Prospect filed an appeal of the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.txt
      • dismisses the Request for Review filed by Blessed Sacrament - St. Gabriel High School (Blessed Sacrament), New Rochelle, New York. Blessed Sacrament seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 21, 2001. The Commission received Blessed Sacrament's Request for Review on September 27, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.txt
      • (Request for Review). Id. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). Letter from Jean Luker, Washington County Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 9, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.txt
      • the Common Carrier Bureau, Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Waukegan Public Schools (Waukegan), Waukegan, Illinois. Waukegan seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 20, 2001. The Commission received Waukegan's Request for Review on September 20, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.txt
      • a request for discounts for internet access, Funding Request Number (FRN) 65038. On November 7, 2000, Solon appealed SLD's decision, and on November 17, 2000, SLD denied the appeal. Subsequently, on December 5, 2000, Solon filed a Request for Review with the Commission. The Commission denied Solon's Request for Review on the basis that it was untimely filed. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 397276 and 397523. On October 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Matawan-Aberdeen's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Matawan-Aberdeen subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.txt
      • Birns Telecommunications Inc, was not included in the decision letter. On September 28, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bnos Zion's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bnos Zion subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.txt
      • the percentage for its school district was 75%, and challenging the difference. On September 21, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Buffalo's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Buffalo subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.txt
      • 2001, Colusa filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 580276. On August 31, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colusa's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colusa subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.txt
      • 2001, Johnson filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 515177. On October 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Johnson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Johnson subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.txt
      • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 651500, 655033, and 655436. On September 28, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Starr King-Edison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Starr King-Edison subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.txt
      • Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation and General Communications, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 22, 2001 (Joint Motion for Extension of Time). Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Unicom, Inc., CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Request for Review, filed October 9, 2001 (Request for Review), at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 54.720. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2811 � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.txt
      • filed by Grand Isle Supervisory Union (Grand Isle), North Hero, Vermont. Grand Isle seeks reconsideration of a decision by the Bureau dismissing Grand Isle's Request for Review as untimely. For the reasons discussed below, the Petition is denied. To the extent that Grand Isle also requests a waiver of the Commission's rules, we deny that request as well. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.txt
      • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Larry Garrow, Saranac Central School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 26, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Larry Garrow, Saranac Central School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 25, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.txt
      • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Mt. Diablo Unified School District (Mt. Diablo), Concord, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 26, 2000. The Commission received Mt. Diablo's Letter of Appeal on November 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Algonquin Regional High (Algonquin), Northborough, Massachusetts. Algonquin seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 6, 2001. The Commission received Algonquin's Request for Review on October 3, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.txt
      • on Appeal. Taylor County also attached the FCDLs for application numbers 241393, 241462, 245426, and 245519 to its Request for Review; the Administrator issued three of these Funding Commitment Decision Letters on July 23, 2001 and the fourth on August 7, 2001. Taylor County's Request for Review asks that the Commission "review this material, and override [USAC's] decision..." Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.txt
      • By the Common Carrier Bureau, Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Fairhill School (Fairhill), Dallas, Texas. Fairhill seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Fairhill's Request for Review on September 11, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Genevieve Prahasto, Island Park Library Friends, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 13, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Genevieve Prahasto, Island Park Library Friends, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 10, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.txt
      • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Orange City Christian School (OCCS), Orange City, Iowa. OCCS seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on February 5, 2001. The Commission received OCCS's Request for Review on May 7, 2001. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Eva Kunz, Knowlton Township Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 30, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Eva Kunz, Knowlton Township Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated July 27, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by New Brighton Area School District (New Brighton), New Brighton, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 11, 2000. The Commission received New Brighton's Letter of Appeal on October 16, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to funding. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Hampshire School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. New Hampshire School subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.txt
      • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 19, 2000. Because Ashby failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Ashby's Request for Review and its request to waive the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on May 19, 2000. Ashby filed an appeal of the funding decision
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 1, 2001. See Letter from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.txt
      • 9, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Daingerfield-Lone Star Independent School District (Daingerfield), Daingerfield, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 4, 2000. The Commission received Daingerfield's Request for Review on October 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.txt
      • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Requests for Review filed by Hawthorn School District 73 (Hawthorn), Vernon Hills, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Hawthorn's Request for Review on November 17, 2000 and December 4, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because Hawthorn failed to timely appeal the April 14, 2000 decision to either the Commission or SLD, the Requests for Review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.txt
      • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Newport Public School District (Newport County), Newport, Rhode Island, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 8, 2000. The Commission received Newport County's Letter of Appeal on October 30, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.txt
      • February 9, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Peach Public Libraries (Peach), Fort Valley, Georgia, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 19, 1999. The Commission received Peach's Request for Review on May 7, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.txt
      • 2000, Windham filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 390370. On December 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Windham's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Windham subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.txt
      • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Half Hollow Hills School District (Half Hollow), Dix Hills, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 8, 2000. The Commission received Half Hollow's Request for Review on December 22, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 23, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 23, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 410362. On September 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Ana's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Ana subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 485878. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Tuckahoe Union's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Tuckahoe Union subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.txt
      • Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 17, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Susan Hite, Crown King Public Library, dated April 14, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Request for Review from Susan Hite, Crown King Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 24, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.txt
      • 2000, Dietrich filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 336896. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Dietrich's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dietrich subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.txt
      • decision did not reflect the funding period that was requested. On May 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Grant County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Grant County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.txt
      • Highway Christian Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 30, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, dated September 29, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Request for Review from Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 30, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.txt
      • discount instead of the requested 80 percent discount. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Pius V's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Pius V subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.txt
      • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 462972, 462973, and 462974. On January 19, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider USD's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. USD subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.txt
      • Commission, filed July 13, 2000 (Request for Review). See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, dated June 30, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 13, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.txt
      • Commission, filed July 13, 2000 (Request for Review). See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, dated June 30, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 13, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.txt
      • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Salem County Vocational Technical Schools (Salem County), Woodstown, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on October 31, 2000. The Commission received Salem County's Request for Review on December 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.txt
      • This order addresses Requests for Review filed by the Caddo Parish School Board (Caddo Parish), Shreveport, Louisiana, on November 9, 1999 and November 12, 1999, seeking review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 12, 1999, regarding Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) 216602 and 252147, respectively. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Request for Review regarding FRN 252147 was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.txt
      • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 275740 and 275741. On May 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Little Miami's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Little Miami subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.txt
      • Mass. DOE's argument that it should be excused because it lacked notice regarding the consequences of failing to comply with SLD's document requests is both contrary to the record and unreasonable on its face. Finally, we note that Mass. DOE was not entitled to relief from SLD for the additional reason that its appeal to SLD was untimely. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Here, SLD issued its Funding Commitment Decision Letter on December 15, 1999. Mass. DOE did not file its appeal with
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 29, 2001. See Letter from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.txt
      • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rome City School District (Rome City), Rome, Georgia, seeking review of two decisions issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on December 8, 2000 and December 22, 2000. The Commission received Rome City's Request for Review on March 14, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.txt
      • 2001, Lemoore filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 402771. On February 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lemoore's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lemoore subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.txt
      • York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from Joseph Fatuzzo, St. Christopher-Ottilie, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 12, 2001. See Letter from Joseph Fatuzzo, St. Christopher-Ottilie, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 12, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.txt
      • January 29, 2001 decision dismissing Levittown's Request for Review as untimely. E-Rate Central also requests that we instruct the Universal Service Administrative Company to implement appeal notification procedures for its Schools and Libraries Division (SLD). For the reasons set forth below, we deny Levittown's Petition for Reconsideration. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any appeal seeking review of a decision issued by SLD, must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered filed with the Commission only upon receipt. SLD denied Levittown funding in an Administrator's Decision on Appeal letter dated May 10, 2000. The Commission,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Perth Amboy's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Perth Amboy subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.txt
      • Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). Pleasantville seeks review of SLD's denial of its application for Year 2 funding under the schools and libraries universal service support program. Because Pleasantville failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the corresponding Funding Commitment Decision Letter, we deny Pleasantville's Request for Review. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered filed with the Commission only upon receipt. On April 27, 2001, SLD issued Funding Commitment Decision Letters (FCDLs) denying Pleasantville's applications. It explained, ``Applicant has not demonstrated that it has access to adequate
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1115A1.txt
      • for Review by Prince George's County Schools, at para. 4.. Petition for Reconsideration, at 2-3. Petition for Reconsideration, at 3. Id. Id. Id. at 4 (emphasis in original). See Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 901 F.2d 147, 153 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1990); Functional Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 274 F.2d 543, 546 (D.C. Cir. 1958). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720; see Request for Review (filed on October 2, 2001); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to John D. Harrington, Funds for Learning, dated September 4, 2001. Petition for Reconsideration, at 3-4. Voice Stream PCS I License, 16 FCC Rcd 7584, para. 8 (Enf. Bur. 2001); see also Jelks v. Federal Communications Commission, 146 F.3d 878, 881
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.txt
      • Independent School District (Ropes ISD), Ropesville, Texas. Ropes ISD seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 21, 2001. The Commission received Ropes ISD's Request for Review on April 1, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.txt
      • by Walker-Hackensack-Akeley Public Schools, Independent School District 113 (Walker-Hackensack), Walker, Minnesota. Walker-Hackensack seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 2, 2001. The Commission received Walker-Hackensack's Request for Review on August 2, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.txt
      • 28, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Forestburg's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 16, 2001 Block 5 Rejection Letter was issued. Forestburg subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.txt
      • filed by Chawanakee Joint Elementary School District (Chawanakee), North Fork, California. Chawanakee seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 6, 2001. The Commission received Chawanakee's Request for Review on September 6, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.txt
      • 555547. On February 11, 2002, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Bloomingdale's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bloomingdale subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Easton Area's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Easton Area subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.txt
      • by Wheeling Catholic Elementary School (Wheeling), Wheeling, West Virginia. Wheeling seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 27, 2001. The Commission received Wheeling's Request for Review on January 28, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.txt
      • because changing the site identifier on the FRNs would match each site identifier with the wrong contract number, service description Attachment, and Billing Account number. We therefore find that the Letter of Appeal submitted to SLD by South San Antonio on August 17, 2000 was subject to the appeals period established in section 54 of the Commission regulations. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.txt
      • 545533. On February 11, 2002, SLD issued an Administrator's Decisions on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Fairfield's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Fairfield subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.txt
      • 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Plymouth's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the March 6, 2001 Year 4 Certification Rejection Letter was issued. Plymouth subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Plymouth's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 30-day period, we affirm the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.txt
      • of Bangor Public Library (Bangor), Bangor, Maine. Bangor seeks review of a funding commitment decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on November 16, 2001. The Commission received Bangor's Request for Review on April 24, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeanne Buschart, Brentwood High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 15, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Jeanne Buschart, Brentwood High School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 21, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.txt
      • (The New School), Washington, DC. The New School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on February 26, 2002. The Commission received The New School's Request for Review on May 7, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Reavis School's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the January 11, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Reavis School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because Reavis School's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.txt
      • filed February 13, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Larry L. Davis, Prairie Home R-V School District, dated January 30, 2001. See Letter from Dr. Larry L. Davis, Prairie Home Public Schools R-V, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 9, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Request for Review by Los Angeles Unified School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Annmarie Carter, Shenandoah Valley School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 6, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Annmarie Carter, Shenandoah Valley School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 4, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.txt
      • G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lloyd Wright, Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 23, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Lloyd Wright, Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 29, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Electronic mail from Ramonita Vazquez Diaz, Escuela Moises Melendez, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 29, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Ramonita Vazquez Diaz, Escuela Moises Melendez, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 3, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.txt
      • and received by SLD, as Messmer alleges. Persuasive evidence that the Commission or SLD received a communication could include a date-stamped postal return receipt. The proffered copy of the January 2, 2002 letter, without more, is insufficient to demonstrate that an appeal was timely filed. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, Messmer's Request for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.txt
      • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ERIE 2 BOCES's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the September 28, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. ERIE 2 BOCES subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because ERIE 2 BOCES's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.txt
      • Patrick School (St. Patrick), White Lake, Michigan. St. Patrick seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 12, 2002. The Commission received St. Patrick's Request for Review on June 5, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.txt
      • 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed May 22, 2002, by Weyauwega-Fremont High School, Weyauwega, Wisconsin, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gerald Pardun, Weyauwega-Fremont High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 22, 2002 (Waiver Request). The Funding Year 2001 deadline was established in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). In prior years, this funding period was referred to as Funding Year 4. Funding periods are now described by the year in which the funding period starts. Thus the funding period which begins on July 1, 2001 and ends on June 30, 2002, previously known as Funding Year 4, is now called
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.txt
      • to Fedex for overnight delivery. SLD did not receive Alameda's appeal until June 1, 2001. In its June 6, 2001 Administrator's Decision on Appeal, SLD denied Alameda's appeal because SLD received it more than 30 days after the April 24, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Alameda subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, appeals seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Requests for review are considered filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.txt
      • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Barbara Mulholland, Closter Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 21, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Barbara Mulholland, Closter Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 17, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.txt
      • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Paul Hill, Sheldon Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 25, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Paul Hill, Sheldon Independent School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 20, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.txt
      • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tammy Grissom, Tennessee School Boards Association, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 11, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Tammy Grissom, Tennessee School Boards Association, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 10, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.txt
      • have filed its FCC Form 470 without a completed signature. On October 1, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Alisal Union's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Alisal Union subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.txt
      • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 681406. On November 5, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider All Saints' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. All Saints' subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.txt
      • 2001, Dixon filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 498820. On November 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Dixon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dixon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.txt
      • decision to deny FRNs 643497, 644879, 645169, and 646519. On November 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider East Central's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the September 14, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. East Central subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.txt
      • the first Administrator's Decision on Appeal except that the date of issuance of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was stated to be October 13, 2000 instead of October 23, 2000. Marysville again filed a Request for Review with the Commission, asserting that October 23, 2000 is the date on which the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was actually issued. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Laurence Mala, Our Lady Queen of Peace School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 20, 2001. See Letter from Laurence Mala, Our Lady Queen of Peace School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 16, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.txt
      • discounted services. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Strathmore's appeal with respect to the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letters because it was received more than 30 days after these Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Strathmore subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.txt
      • SLD's decision to deny FRNs 633360, 633524, 633598, and 633686. On November 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Westport Edison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Westport Edison subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.txt
      • 2001, Wheeler filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 547827. On November 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Wheeler's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Wheeler subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Inland Lakes' appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the November 16, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Inland Lakes subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Inland Lakes' Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.txt
      • G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Heinemann, Illinois School for the Deaf, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 9, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Mary Heinemann, Illinois School for the Deaf, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 9, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jumoke Charter's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the March 15, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jumoke Charter subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Jumoke Charter's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.txt
      • Bureau: introduction This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by International Telcom, Ltd. (International Telcom). International Telcom seeks review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on June 27, 2001. The Commission received International Telcom's Request for Review on November 6, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of the decision the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.txt
      • December 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider St. Elizabeth's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 26, 2001 Postcard was issued. St. Elizabeth subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Baltimore Academy's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the February 8, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Baltimore Academy subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because Baltimore Academy's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Brandon's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the March 15, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Brandon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Graydon Manor's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the March 15, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Graydon Manor subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from C.W. Caligan, Hardee County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 22, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from C. W. Caligan, Hardee County School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 18, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.txt
      • October 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Round Lake's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Round Lake subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.txt
      • Ottawa Public Schools (West Ottawa), Holland, Michigan. West Ottawa seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 1, 2002. The Commission received West Ottawa's Request for Review on July 1, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.txt
      • decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 18, 2001 canceling Funding Request Number (FRN) 295852. Specifically, Wilcox requests that the deadline for invoices be extended. The Commission received Wilcox's Request for Review on September 18, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.txt
      • Park Union Free School District (Deer Park). Deer Park seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on December 17, 2001. The Commission received Deer Park's Request for Review on May 22, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.txt
      • Request for Review filed by Hastings-On-Hudson UFSD (Hastings), Hastings-On-Hudson, New York. Hastings seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on January 2, 2001. The Commission received Hastings's Request for Review on May 30, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.txt
      • Decision Letters. Virginia DOE's request for review of the rejection of these applications is therefore moot, and we dismiss the Request for Review in connection with these applications accordingly. We find that Virginia DOE's Request for Review is untimely with regard to most of the remaining applications. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.txt
      • to deny discounts for application SLD-226039. It contends that it mailed the FCC Form 470 certification in the same envelope as the certification for FCC Form 470 No. 8353. As an initial matter, we dismiss as untimely Weathersfield's Request for Review as it relates to application SLD-226039. For requests for review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.txt
      • Elementary School District (Arcata Elementary), Arcata, California. Arcata Elementary seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Arcata Elementary's Request for Review on August 31, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.txt
      • Area Public Library (Chatham Area), Chatham, Illinois. Chatham Area seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Chatham Area's Request for Review on September 9, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.txt
      • County Public Schools (Kent County), Chestertown, Maryland. Kent County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Kent County's Request for Review on September 3, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.txt
      • County School District (Bullitt County), Shepherdsville, Kentucky. Bullitt County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 29, 2002. The Commission received Bullitt County's Request for Review on May 31, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.txt
      • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Chicago Public Schools' appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the April 24, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Chicago Public Schools subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Chicago Public Schools' Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.txt
      • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jewish Educational Center's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the April 24, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jewish Educational Center subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Jewish Educational Center's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.txt
      • 2001, Johnson filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 515177. On October 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Johnson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Johnson subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Homer-Center's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the April 24, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Homer-Center subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Because Homer-Center's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.txt
      • the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Waiver Request on May 8, 2002. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.txt
      • (Administrator) on March 7, 2000, or, in the alternative, waiver of the Funding Year 2000 filing deadline. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the Request for Review and deny the Request for Waiver. The Commission received Lincoln County's Request for Review on April 30, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.txt
      • 2002 time frame. Persuasive evidence that the Commission or SLD received a communication could include a postmarked, certified, or registered mail receipt. The proffered copy of the March 25, 2002 letter, without more, is insufficient to demonstrate that an appeal was timely filed with SLD. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Varisco-Rogers Charter's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.txt
      • and Sentinel did not meet Funding Year 2001 minimum processing standards because they had used the incorrect OMB-approved FCC Form 471 that was dated October 2000 in the lower-right hand corner of the form. On December 20, 2001, Sentinel and Paloma filed the instant Requests for Review. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.txt
      • Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on December 28, 2001 and March 6, 2002. The Commission received Pajaro Valley's Requests for Review and Waiver on February 28 and May 6, 2002, respectively. For the reasons set forth below, we deny both requests. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Requests for Review and Waiver were not filed within the requisite 60-day
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Yeshivat's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the April 19, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Yeshivat subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Yeshivat's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Aura Alfaro, Escuela Manuel Corchado, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 11, 2002 (Request for Review). Electronic Mail from Aura Alfaro, Escuela Manuel Corchado, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 8, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.txt
      • for Review filed by Akron-Fairgrove Schools (Akron-Fairgrove), Fairgrove, Michigan. Akron-Fairgrove seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 1, 2002. The Commission received Akron-Fairgrove's Request for Review on October 2, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.txt
      • City Public Schools (Alexandria City), Alexandria, Virginia. Alexandria City seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Alexandria City's Request for Review on September 18, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Aurora Weier's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the August 31, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Aurora Weier subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Because Aurora Weier's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bayliss' appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the May 7, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bayliss subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Bayliss's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.txt
      • from Pete Cote, Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District (SLD Application No. 316961), to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 18, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review); Letter from Pete Cote, Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District (SLD Application No. 321149), to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 18, 2002. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.txt
      • G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tobin A. Mitchell, South Cook Educational Consortium, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 11, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Tobin A. Mitchell, South Cook Educational Consortium, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 11, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.txt
      • Union High School District (Sweetwater), Chula Vista, California. Sweetwater seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on April 25, 2002. The Commission received Sweetwater SD's Request for Review on June 27, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.txt
      • (Healy Public Schools), Healy, Kansas. Healy Public Schools seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received Healy Public Schools' Request for Review on October 16, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.txt
      • Inc., File No. 145224, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15157, n.2 (Com. Car. Bur. 2000); Juan Galiano, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6442, 6443 (1990) (``[I]f the Commission were to entertain and accept unsupported arguments that letters mailed in Commission proceedings were not delivered... procedural havoc and abuse would result.''). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 01-376 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 28,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Blessed Sacrament's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the June 17, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Blessed Sacrament subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because Blessed Sacrament's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.txt
      • School Department (Portsmouth School), Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Portsmouth School seeks review of three decisions issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 13, 2002. The Commission received Portsmouth School's Request for Review on October 16, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joni Wilson, Gentry Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 4, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Joni Wilson, Gentry Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 13, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.txt
      • 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that Talmud Torah's appeal was received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued and was therefore untimely. Talmud Torah subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued by SLD on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or the Administrator within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed only upon receipt. Based on the record, we find that Talmud Torah timely filed the Appeal to SLD. The record demonstrates that
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gilda E. Stanbery-Cotney, Peach Public Libraries, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 24, 2001 (Request for Review). Letter from Gilda E. Stanbery-Cotney, Peach Public Libraries, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 21, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.txt
      • Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Darren W. Anglin, St. Clair County Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 17, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Darren W. Anglin, St. Clair County Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated September 12, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.txt
      • Request for Review as untimely. Chawanakee asserts that the request for review is timely under Commission regulations and the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Petition for Reconsideration. At issue is SLD's final decision on Chawanakee's Funding Year 2001 application for discounts, which SLD issued on August 6, 2001. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules requires requests for review of all Administrator decisions to be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision. Chawanakee did not file its Request for Review with the Commission until 31 days after the issuance of SLD's decision, but argued that the request for review was timely because Chawanakee's arguments rested on the legal
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.txt
      • Valley Public Library (Grand Valley), Orwell, Ohio. Grand Valley seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 2, 2002. The Commission received Grand Valley's Request for Review on October 17, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.txt
      • of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Oklahoma City Public Schools, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Supplemental Filing, filed December 5, 2001 (Supplemental Filing). However, because the Supplemental Filing was submitted after the expiration of the 30-day period established by the Commission's rules for requests for review, we do not further consider it. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Request for Review. See, supra, para. 3. See SouthWest Ohio Computer Association Order, para. 10; Request for Review by Genesee Intermediate School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-151960, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 11820, paras. 8-9 (Com. Car.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.txt
      • issued six Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letters indicating that it would not consider Winnebago's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 20, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Winnebago subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. SLD misapplied the rule in its Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letters. We find the applicant complied with
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.txt
      • School District 877 (Buffalo School), Buffalo, Minnesota. Buffalo School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 29, 2002. The Commission received Buffalo School's Request for Waiver on October 29, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Waiver was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.txt
      • Waiver filed by Petersburg Public Library (Petersburg), Petersburg, Virginia. Petersburg seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 29, 2002. The Commission received Petersburg's Request for Waiver on October 24, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Waiver was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.txt
      • Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Mary High School's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the May 7, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Mary High School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the St. Mary High School's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.txt
      • filed by Sullins Academy (Sullins), Bristol, Virginia. Sullins seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator or USAC) on June 24, 2002. The Commission received Sullins' Request for Review on October 3, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.txt
      • 12, 2002. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue a Pink Postcard on July 17, 2001. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3290A1.txt
      • Portsmouth School sought review of three decisions issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 13, 2002. In the Portsmouth Order, the Division found that Commission received Portsmouth School's Request for Review on October 16, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the record indicated that the Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.txt
      • Public School (Wayne County), Goldsboro, North Carolina. Wayne County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 8, 2002. The Commission received Wayne County's Request for Review on September 26, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.txt
      • 5, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Addison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Addison subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.txt
      • issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeals indicating that it would not consider Granger's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the July 23 and August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Granger subsequently filed the instant Requests for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.txt
      • 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mulberry's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mulberry subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.txt
      • August 26, 2002, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Horizon's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Horizon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the St. Lucy School's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.txt
      • St. Bernadette School (St. Bernadette), Seattle, Washington. St. Bernadette seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 1, 2002. The Commission received St. Bernadette's Request for Review on September 18, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Francis Xavier's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Francis Xavier subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.txt
      • County School District (Kanawha County), Cleveland, Ohio. Kanawha County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on September 25, 2002. The Commission received Kanawha County's Request for Waiver on November 26, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mescalero's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 1, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mescalero subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, Mescalero's Request for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Midlothian Independent's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the June 3, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Midlothian Independent subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Midlothian Independent's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Melrose Area's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Melrose Area subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.txt
      • Sheet. The Letter Re-Order Advisory Cover Sheet notes that all terms, conditions, dates and/or actions imposed by the Schools and Libraries Program on applicants or service providers that are dependent on the specific dates in effect with the original letter remain unchanged, including deadlines for filing appeals. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.txt
      • November 5, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider East Alton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. East Alton subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.txt
      • filed by Huntington Union Free School District (Huntington), Huntington, New York. Huntington seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 23, 2001. The Commission received Huntington's Request for Review on November 27, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.txt
      • not have rejected the application for failure to satisfy the minimum processing standards. On March 26, 2001, E-Rate Central submitted the pending Request for Review, seeking review and reversal of the minimum processing standards rejection of St. Patrick's application under the analysis followed in the Naperville Order. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any party seeking review of a decision issued by the Administrator must file its request with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider West Harrison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. West Harrison subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.txt
      • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Moody, Hanna Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Robert Moody, Hanna Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 28, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.txt
      • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kim Gray, Municipal Telephone Exchange, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 22, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Kim Gray, Municipal Telephone Exchange, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 22, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 14, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Richard J. Malfatti, Somis Union School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 30, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Richard J. Malfatti, Somis Union School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 30, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.txt
      • 54.719(c). We note that Floyd County filed a simultaneous appeal to the Administrator of the decision in Application No. 275627. See Letter from Jerry Gatlin, Floyd County Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 2, 2001. The Commission's regulations do not contemplate simultaneous appeals to the Commission and the Administrator. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Therefore, we would ordinarily dismiss this appeal without prejudice to file a new appeal once the Administrator had rendered a decision. However, because we
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.txt
      • (specifying ACD of January 17, 2000). FCC Form 470, Oakland Unified School District, USCN 521140000122212, filed January 14, 1999 (specifying ACD of February 22, 1999). Request for Review, at 1. Request for Review, at 1-2, Attachment (Letter from Robert Cambell, Pacific Bell, to George McDonald, Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated October 26, 2001). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Request for Review by Children's Home Society, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-183026, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-2795, para. 8 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. December 4, 2001). 02-750 02-750 . / I J � t � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.txt
      • Request for Review filed by Elgin Public Library (Elgin), Elgin, Iowa. Elgin seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on April 29, 1999. The Commission received Elgin's Request for Review on October 2, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Lancaster Area's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lancaster Area subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.txt
      • G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 27, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 7, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.txt
      • WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gitty Horowitz, Bnois Spinka, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 24, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Gitty Horowitz, Bnois Spinka, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 28, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.txt
      • Floyd County Board of Education (Floyd County), Rome, Georgia. Floyd County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on November 17, 2000. The Commission received Floyd County's Request for Review on February 26, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.txt
      • 1, 2002, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Haywood's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Haywood subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jody Bell, Rochester Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 4, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Jody Bell, Rochester Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated November 5, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Saint Michael's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the September 4, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Saint Michael subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be remanded
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.txt
      • G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ann Gissal, School District of Wisconsin Dells, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 25, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Ann Gissal, School District of Wisconsin Dells, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 15, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Deegan, St. Jude School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Michael Deegan, St. Jude School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 5, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.txt
      • February 11, 2002, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Kings Local's appeals because they were received more than 60 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Kings Local subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.txt
      • GTE Service Corp. v. FCC, 121 S. Ct. 423 (November 2, 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(b), (c); Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, OMB 3060-0806 (December 1998) (FCC Form 471). 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(g). >. > (Minimum Processing Standards). Minimum Processing Standards. Minimum Processing Standards. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Due to recent disruptions in the reliability of the mail service, the appeal period has been extended to 60 days for Requests for Review seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001. See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 01-376
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Mirrer Yeshiva's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mirrer Yeshiva subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Paso Robles's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 26, 2001 FCC Form 471 Certification Rejection Letter was issued. Paso Robles subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.txt
      • Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Our Lady of Lourdes's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Our Lady of Lourdes subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.txt
      • 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ubly's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the September 14, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ubly subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the 30-day period has been extended by an additional 30 days for requests for review, Ubly's
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider West Branch's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. West Branch subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.txt
      • 28, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Gloversville's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gloversville subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.txt
      • Governor's School), Hartsville, South Carolina. S.C. Governor's School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on November 7, 2001. The Commission received S.C. Governor's School's Request for Review on January 8, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.txt
      • the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Gary Habeeb, Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 26, 2002; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Gary Habeeb, Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District, dated January 21, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.txt
      • behalf of Remer School District No. 118, Remer, Minnesota. Northland seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 17, 2001. The Commission received Northland's Request for Review on December 31, 2001. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider St. Norbert's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Norbert subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.txt
      • issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. John's Prep's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. John's Prep subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.txt
      • Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Chelsea School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 27, 2001 Funding Year 2001 FCC Form 471 Rejection Letter was issued. Chelsea School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Apostles School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the May 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Apostles School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.txt
      • Calhoun states that it did not file an appeal within 30 days of the FCDL because the FCDL did not grant or deny FRN 654354, and because Calhoun was informed that it should wait for a second FCDL to arrive. For appeals to SLD or to the Commission seeking review of SLD decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, the appeal must be filed with SLD or the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. For decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, requests for review must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Apostles School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Apostles School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the SLD or the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Washington County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Washington County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Granger School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the August 7, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Granger School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from LuAnn Hayden, School District of Durand, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 22, 2003 (Request for Review); Postcard from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Chuck Kukura, School District of Durand, dated March 29, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sheila Musselman, Clifton High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 25, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Sheila Musselman, Clifton High School, dated January 21, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.txt
      • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ryan Martin, Gardner Unified School District 231, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 12, 2002 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company to Doug Berg, Gardner Unified School District 231, dated August 26, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.txt
      • Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Wayne Azon, Genoa-Kingston Community Unit School District 424, dated January 27, 2003 (regarding SLD Application Number 327932) and Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Curt Gustafson, Genoa-Kingston Community Unit School District 424, dated March 4, 2003 (regarding SLD Application Number 247609). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.txt
      • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Becca Carsel, Lucia Mar Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 16, 2003 (Request for Review); Letters from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jon Hitchen, Lucia Mar Unified School District, dated January 22, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.txt
      • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Spires, Riverside County Office of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 3, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to William Spires, Riverside County Office of Education, dated December 16, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.txt
      • School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 17, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Michael Esolda, Woodbridge Township School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 17, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1579 ! . / 0 1 3 4 1 2 3 4 �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.txt
      • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nechama Green, Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 26, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rabbi Jacob Krouse, Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn, dated January 21, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.txt
      • Grainfield City Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 18, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Anna Whiteman, Grainfield City Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 17, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1885 h"9 � � � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.txt
      • to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 31, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Paula Magnus, Northside Center for Child Development, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 28, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1921 # 0 1 2 3 5 3 4 5 �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.txt
      • June, 1999. Shortly thereafter, SLD issued a decision in each of the affected applications, addressed to the applicant, not GCI, in which SLD dismissed the SLD Appeal as untimely because it was filed more than 30 days after the issuance of the relevant Funding Commitment Decision Letter. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. On January 11, 2001, having received no notice of the outcome of its appeal, GCI inquired with
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.txt
      • Ahead Communications Systems, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 14, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Theresa DeNuzzo, Ahead Communications Systems, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 11, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1946 ( ) * + - � + , - �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.txt
      • regarding SLD Application Number 344224; Letter from Sandy Nelson, Federal Way Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 13, 2003, regarding SLD Application Number 344236; Letter from Sandy Nelson, Federal Way Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 13, 2003, regarding SLD Application Number 344279. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1947 � � � � � � � htm htm � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Georgia Morrow, E-Rate Consulting, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 10, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Johanna Whitley, Anderson County School District, dated April 10, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Alvin Hord, Blount County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 29, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Alvin Hord, Blount County Schools, dated March 27, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.txt
      • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Raymond Caplinger, Colorado Springs School District 11, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 25, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Raymond Caplinger, Colorado Springs School District 11, dated April 22, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.txt
      • Linden Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 29, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Frank Taranto, Linden Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 29, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2290 � (R) � � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.txt
      • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr. Reginald Mayo, New Haven Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Reginald Mayo, New Haven Public Schools, dated December 20, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.txt
      • District 234, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 5, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Kevin Lancaster, Bliss School District 234, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 3, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2433 � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.txt
      • School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 12, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Isabelle Harrington, Iditarod Area School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 13, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2434 � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.txt
      • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Monty Brown, Unified School District No. 507, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 10, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Monty Brown, Unified School District No. 507, dated April 7, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.txt
      • the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Franklin Fenton, Baldwin Park Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 31, 2002; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Franklin Fenton, Baldwin Park Unified School District, dated June 3, 2002. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.txt
      • June 2, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Melanie Reppond, CenturyTel, Inc., dated September 21, 2001. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.txt
      • Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 6, 2003. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Ryan Sicard, School District of Somerset, dated August 6, 2002 and Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jan Carlson, School District of Somerset, dated February 13, 2003 (Administrator's Decisions on Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.txt
      • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). See Letter from Carol J. Veitch, Mifflin County Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 4, 2001; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Carol J. Veitch, Mifflin County Library, dated October 31, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Id. Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). In re Mary Ann Salvatiello, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4705, 4707-8, para. 22 (1991) (citing Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond, 497 US 1046 (1990)). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2583 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2583
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.txt
      • Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Sister Judine Hilbing, Saint Michael School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 27, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Sister Judine Hilbing, Saint Michael School, dated March 4, 2003. Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.txt
      • Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan G. Gauch, Bemus Point Central School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Susan G. Gauch, Bemus Point School District, dated November 9, 2001; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.txt
      • Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeffrey Lorentz, Galena Park Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 27, 2003 (Request for Waiver). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules states that the Commission may waive its rules on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefore is shown. 47 C.F. R. �1.3. �54.720(b). Letter from Shirley Neeley, Galena Park Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 24, 2003 (Request for Review). See also Request for Waiver by Alpine County Unified School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. NEC. 471,01-24-00.5400170, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order 17
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.txt
      • seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Janis Benson, Charlyn Bruchmiller, and Max Gordon, Brady Independent School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 5, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Janis Benson, Brady Independent School District, dated May 6, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.txt
      • Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 8, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Ralph Rich, W. T. Rich Company, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 8, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2965 ! 9 : O R e r s t u v u
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michelle Chemotti, Thomas Communications & Technology, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 3, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Michelle Chemotti, Thomas Communications & Technology, dated June 25, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2966 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2966 1 < A B G � ` tm � � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.txt
      • Educational Computing Solutions, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 5, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Kermit Lattimore, Educational Computing Solutions, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 5, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2967 $ % & ' ) � ' ( ) �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.txt
      • June 19, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Melanie Reppond, CenturyTel, Inc., dated September 21, 2001. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Ann Dowling, Edwin Gould Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 17, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Mary Ann Dowling, Edwin Gould Academy, dated April 14, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2969 � / 1 ? A I Y ^ e � � � � � � � � � Y _
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.txt
      • 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Bill Swartzmiller, North Central Ohio Computer Cooperative, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 14, 2003; Letters from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bill Swartzmiller, North Central Ohio Computer Cooperative, dated February 22, 2003, regarding SLD Application Numbers 226381, 248224, 250882, 257003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Blessed Sacrament's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the June 3, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Blessed Sacrament subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Blessed Sacrament's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Lamb, Clovis Municipal Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 27, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Michael Lamb, Clovis Municipal Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 7, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.txt
      • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Elia Hernandez, Father Yermo High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 4, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Elia Hernandez, Father Yermo High School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 2, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.txt
      • Letter from Rhoda Young, Dickey LaMoure Multidistrict Special Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 12, 2002. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rhoda Young, Dickey LaMoure Multidistrict Special Education, dated June 24, 2002. Id. See Request for Review. Id. Id. See Dickey LaMoure Form 471. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lori McClenathan, HLV Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 25, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from William A. Lynch, HLV Community School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 28, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.txt
      • Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Hazelton, Memphis City School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 27, 2003 (Request for Review); Funding Commitment Decision Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bill Hazelton, Memphis City School District, dated March 24, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.txt
      • School District (Kershaw County), Camden, South Carolina. Kershaw County seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on September 30, 2002. The Commission received Kershaw County's Request for Review on December 6, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.txt
      • 22, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Corbin Witt, Atchison Public Schools, dated January 21, 2003. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3630 ' $ 4 9 G a q � ' `` - 4 q ' 4 �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Glenda Pate, Cedar County Library District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 25, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Glenda Pate, Cedar County Library District, dated June 9, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.txt
      • 54.719(c). See Letter from Sister Elizabeth Dalessio, Monmouth Ocean Educational Services Commission, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 24, 2003; Letters from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Sister Elizabeth Dalessio, Monmouth Ocean Educational Services Commission, dated June 30, 2003, regarding SLD Application Numbers 307404, 321280, 321541, and 323561. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.txt
      • may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Garvin Burton, West Harvey-Dixmoor Public School District #147, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 6, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Garvin Burton, West Harvey-Dixmoor Public School District #147, dated June 10, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3681 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3681 * . q u (c) � � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.txt
      • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Patrick School's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the May 7, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Patrick School subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the St. Patrick School's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-381A1.txt
      • SLD's unreasonable delay in responding to Queen of Apostles' request for a copy of a missing page from the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. In this Order, we affirm our prior decision, but seek to clarify the reasoning set forth in the Queen of Apostles' Order. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or before August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Accordingly, appeals of funding commitments must be filed within 30 days of the date of
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.txt
      • School District 493 (Columbus Unified), Lawrence, Kansas. Columbus Unified seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 21, 2002. The Commission received Columbus Unified's Request for Review on December 2, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Eastchester's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 30, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Eastchester subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Eastchester's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Huron ISD's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 16, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Huron ISD subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Huron ISD's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.txt
      • Mary-St. Casimir School (Immaculate Heart), Lansing, Michigan. Immaculate Heart seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on June 17, 2002. The Commission received Immaculate Heart's Request for Review on September 17, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.txt
      • St. Joseph University Heights (St. Joseph), Buffalo, New York. St. Joseph seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 23, 2001. The Commission received St. Joseph's Request for Review on October 28, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.txt
      • St. Lucy School, Newark, New Jersey. St. Lucy School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on August 27, 2002. The Commission received St. Lucy's Request for Review on October 30, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.txt
      • an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Stafford Municipal's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the July 1, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Stafford Municipal subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, Stafford Municipal's Request
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.txt
      • Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Stanfield Elementary's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the March 22, 2001 Fund Year 4 Form 471 - Rejection Letter was issued. Stanfield Elementary subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued before August 13, 2001, under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.txt
      • SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Welch's appeal because it was received more than 60 days after the September 9, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Welch subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Welch's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.txt
      • Dubuque Community Schools (Dubuque Community), Dubuque, Iowa. Dubuque Community seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on April 23, 2002. The Commission received Dubuque Community's Request for Review on July 30, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.txt
      • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Mayes, Huron Intermediate School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 19, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from William Mayes, Huron Intermediate School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 22, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.txt
      • filed by the Spurwink School, Portland, Maine. Spurwink School seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on March 15, 2002. The Commission received Spurwink School's Request for Review on November 5, 2002. For requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001 under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.txt
      • Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Greg Whaley and Brian Mitchell, Fair Play R-2 School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2003 (Request for Review). Letter from Greg Whaley and Brian Mitchell, Fair Play R-2 School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 19, 2003 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.txt
      • COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Norman Hughes, Glades County School Board, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 29, 2003 (Request for Review). Letter from Wayne Aldrich, Glades County School Board, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed November 27, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.txt
      • Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jessica Edmiston, Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 13, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jessica Edmiston, Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, dated December 10, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary McNeal, Glen Mills Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 24, 2003 (Request for Waiver). Letter from Mary McNeal, Glen Mills Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 14, 2003 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.txt
      • Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Futty, Julie Keesling, and Frederick Schmitt, Norfolk Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 24, 2002 (Request for Review). Letter from Dennis Futty, Julie Keesling, and Frederick Schmitt, Norfolk Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 23, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.txt
      • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jann Cohen, Ventnor Educational Community Complex, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 30, 2003 (Request for Review); Postcards from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Penny Margolis, Ventnor Educational Community Complex, dated March 29, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.txt
      • Department, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 7, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Lillian Brooks, City of Espanola Finance Department, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 22, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-108 - � � � " � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.txt
      • 2, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 21, 2003 (Request for Waiver). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Dennis Thompson, Hampton County School District 2, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 24, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-109 � ^ d n x } ~ � � � 8� "
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.txt
      • District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 12, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Julie April, Murrieta Valley Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 5, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-111 tm � (c) � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.txt
      • March 26, 2003, Letter from Elizabeth Egan, Gloucester City Library, filed March 22, 2004, and Letter from Deborah Cline, North Penn School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 13, 2003 (Requests for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a)-(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.txt
      • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Daniel Nakamoto, North American Family Institute, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 3, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Daniel Nakamoto, North American Family Institute, dated March 5, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Waiver at 3. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990).
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.txt
      • the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Jim Utley, School Board of Alachua County, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 19, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jim Utley, School Board of Alachua County, dated May 22, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990).
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.txt
      • School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 17, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Nancy Collins, Saint Catherine of Genoa School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 16, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-114 � z � � � � ` � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.txt
      • School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 31, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Barb Landon, Tunkhannock Area School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 30, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-115 � ` - - � � � � � � � 6�
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.txt
      • Rcd 5091, para. 4 (Com. Car. Bur. 2002). . Request for Review by New Hartford Central School District, Federal Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-007628, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 19329, para. 6 (Com. Car. Bur. 2001). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 04-1253 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1253 > � � � � � = > � " � � � � � � 0 � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.txt
      • December 10, 2003, filed December 18, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Carla Porter, Holyoke School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated September 22, 2003, filed September 25, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1842 � ( ( - 1 3 8 9 > n o {
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.txt
      • of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). See Request for Review. Normally, such appeals must be filed with the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of the decision the party seeks to have reviewed. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). However, due to disruption in the reliability of the mail service, the 30-day appeal period has been extended by an additional 30 days for requests for review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001. See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (2001). 47 C.F.R.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.txt
      • by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Renee Sanders, Allendale County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, postmarked September 25, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Renee Sanders, Allendale County Schools, dated March 5, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-2485 (R) � % ) ] k l o � � (R) � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.txt
      • by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Ronald MacClay, Dunellen School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 17, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Ronald MacClay, Dunellen School District, dated July 21, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Waiver at 4. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990).
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.txt
      • School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 17, 2004; Letter from Shan Williams, Genesis School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 16, 2004; Letter from Sheryl Timm, Lutheran High School of St. Charles County, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 8, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-2999 � ( , ", - 6 7 8 ? @ E L
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.txt
      • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Peter Hutcher, Oakland Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 23, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Peter Hutcher, Oakland Unified School District, dated June 2, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). See Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.txt
      • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3560 * + 7 8 � � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.txt
      • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3561 � % & , 1 8 9 : = A K M X { � � - h !- � � � � - � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.txt
      • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3562 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3562 � � � � � � (� � � � � � � � � � � � y � � � y �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.txt
      • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). On-Public Internal use Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3563 � . / 4 ; B \ l ... � � / l � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.txt
      • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.txt
      • 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3565 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3565 � 8 ? F M d � � Q c h t v � � � � � � � � � � � � � � q �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.txt
      • Baraga Area Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 24, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Lynn Ketola, Baraga Area Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 23, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Non-Public Internal use Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3566 A H Q Z ` b e
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.txt
      • Decatur Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 21, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Mike Parrish, Decatur Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 20, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Non-Public Internal use Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3567 O V _ k q s v
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.txt
      • Eduardo Delgado, Guamani School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 23, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Eduardo Delgado, Guamani School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 16, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3568 j q z � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.txt
      • Nancy Pierce, Blackstone Public Library, dated May 1, 2003 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Nancy Pierce, Blackstone Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 22, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-367 � E I m s } � � � `` � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.txt
      • Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 15, 2003 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from John Armano, Monroe Township Board of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 13, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-369 " � � � � � 5� � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.txt
      • School District, on August 25, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau (Paramus Order). See Paramus Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 19515, para. 1. Under the Commission's rules, requests for review of SLD decisions must be filed within 60 days of the SLD decision date. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See also Letter from Michelle Chemotti, Thomas Communications & Technology, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 25, 2003 (Request for Review); Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company, to Michelle Chemotti, Thomas Communications & Technology, dated June 25, 2003 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See Petition for Reconsideration at 1. See Administrator's Decision on Appeal.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.txt
      • FLORENCE TELEPHONE COMPANY CONCERNING A DECISION OF THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR TO SUSPEND ITS HIGH-COST UNIVERSAL SERVICE PAYMENTS CC Docket No. 96-45 Release Date: December 17, 2004 Comment Date: January 7, 2005 Reply Comment Date: January 18, 2005 The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on an appeal filed by New Florence Telephone Company (New Florence), pursuant to sections 54.719(c) and 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, of a November 5, 2004 decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) that suspends and withholds high-cost support payments to New Florence. Among other things, New Florence contends that suspension of high-cost support violates its due process and property rights, and restricts the ability of New Florence to provide telecommunications service to its customers.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.txt
      • Heritage Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 5, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Connie Bongiorni, Heritage Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 4, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-406 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-406 j t y z  - �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.txt
      • School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Allison Cioffi, Maricopa County School Superintendent's Office, dated June 30, 2003 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letter). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Letter from the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.txt
      • Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Yitzchok Kaplan, Beth Jacob High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 26, 2002 (Request for Review); Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Yitzchok Kaplan, Beth Jacob High School, dated October 21, 2002; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See in the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-428 3 (c) 7 < J K P ^ x � � (c) � =3 4 5 6 7 K � (c) 3 �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.txt
      • by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from J.M. Swatzell, Sunnyside School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 27, 2003; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to J.M. Swatzell, Sunnyside School District, dated March 4, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.txt
      • Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 4, 2003. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Maureen Davidson, Albuquerque Public Schools, dated June 13, 2003. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to George Castorena, Albuquerque Public Schools, dated January 21, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.txt
      • Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jesse W. Jackson, Jesse Jackson Academy, Houston, Texas, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 29, 2003 (Request for Review); Funding Commitment Decision Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Artie Jackson, Jesse Jackson Academy, Houston, Texas, dated October 6, 2003; 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.txt
      • for Review); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Theresa Mangold, St. Bartholomew Consolidated School, dated June 17, 2002. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See also In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). See Request for Review. 04-599 04-599 X $ W X Y Z f � � � � � X �X� 6 �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.txt
      • 27, 2002 (Request for Administrator's Review). See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bruce Kalter, Donna Public Library, dated October 1, 2002 (regarding SLD application number 320003); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bruce Kalter, Donna Public Library, dated October 1, 2002 (regarding SLD application number 324627). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.txt
      • seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Jim Chapman, Grant Joint Union High School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 12, 2003. Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jim Chapman, Grant Joint Union High School District, dated May 14, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.txt
      • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from Virginia Crow, Murchison Independent School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 20, 2002; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Virginia Crow, Murchison Independent School District, dated January 31, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (rel. Apr. 30, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.txt
      • December 19, 2003, filed December 24, 2003 (Request for Waiver). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from James Reny, Waterville Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated December 19, 2003, filed December 22, 2003. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 04-985 � " , 1 6 7 < = B n o {
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.txt
      • No. 02-6, filed January 24, 2005 (Petition for Waiver). Request for Review of Iroquois West School District 10, Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File No. SLD-343292, CC Docket 02-6, Order, DA 05-54, released January 11, 2005 (Iroquois Order). Petition for Waiver at 4, Appendix B (104 applicants from Pennsylvania and 14 applicants from South Dakota). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Letter from Daniel Farslow, Ohio State E-Rate Coordinator, dated January 28, 2005. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See, e.g., Request for Waiver by Stephen-Argyle Central School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Finch, Battenkill Valley Supervisory Union, to Federal Communications Commission, dated February 3, 2005 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). The Request for Review was dated 169 days after the decision it appeals. In the Request for Review, Arlington School District states that a January 2005 e-mail from SLD gave it the option of filing an appeal with SLD or the FCC. See Request for Review at 1. We conclude, however, that the e-mail was merely responding to an inquiry
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.txt
      • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tomi J. Selby, Information Transport Solutions, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, dated November 5, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). The appeal to SLD was dated 100 days after the decision it appealed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.txt
      • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Allen Damren, School Administrative Unit #6, to Federal Communications Commission, dated November 26, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). The Request for Review was dated 191 days after the decision it appeals. Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1128 h# - . 1 N O j p � � � - " � � � � � � ` ' � � � " � � �� #  � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.txt
      • contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400. -FCC- See, e.g., Connect2 Internet Network, Inc., Request for Review, CC Docket No. 02-06, filed December 13, 2004, at 2. See, e.g., Connect2 Internet Network, Inc., Consolidated Request for Review and Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 02-06, December 27, 2004, at 1-2. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 & C ] p q s � � � � � � � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.txt
      • Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Lawrence Hill, Athens Independent School District, dated October 26, 2004; Letter from Andy Winick, Novacon, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 27, 2004; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Andy Winick, Novacon, dated October 15, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-161 � � � � � � � � � � � � � T � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.txt
      • TELEPHONE COMPANY CONCERNING A DECISION OF THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR TO SUSPEND ITS HIGH-COST UNIVERSAL SERVICE PAYMENTS CC Docket No. 96-45 Release Date: February 2, 2005 Comment Date: February 23, 2005 Reply Comment Date: March 7, 2005 The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on an appeal filed by Cass County Telephone Company (Cass County Telephone), pursuant to sections 54.719(c) and 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, of a November 5, 2004 decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) suspending and withholding high-cost support payments to Cass County Telephone. Among other things, Cass County Telephone contends that suspension of high-cost support violates its procedural and substantive due process rights, and restricts the ability of Cass County Telephone to provide telecommunications service
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.txt
      • from Theodore Hamilton, ONEC, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 2, 2004 (Request for Review). Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bryon Wilcox, ONEC, dated March 3, 2004. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras.55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.txt
      • Smith, Hyde Leadership Public Charter School, Washington, DC, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 4, 2004; Letter from Kara Skarlupka, Sacred Heart School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 30, 2004 (Requests for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a)-(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.txt
      • to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 7, 2004 (Request for Review). Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Roger Bordeaux, Tiospa Zina Tribal School, dated September 24, 2004. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-462 � h h h ' ( ) * B U � � * . / A B F G N S T Z t � � � � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.txt
      • School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 21, 2003; and Letter from Stephen Sinco, Interim Business Manager for Woodbridge Board of Education, concerning Woodbridge School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 4, 2003. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-465 � 3 M N O P V c d "d e k p q x y ` � � � � � � � � � � � d �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.txt
      • Commission, filed December 15, 2004 (Request for Review). See also Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Gary Wilz, Killdeer Public School District No. 16, dated October 26, 2004. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See Letter from Gary Wilz, Killdeer Public School District No. 16, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 2, 2004; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jason Berg, Killdeer Public School District No. 16, dated April 27, 2004. Federal Communications Commission DA 05-466 � h = B I [ \ a
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.txt
      • Narda M. Jones Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sandra Tiedt, Beaver Dam Community Hospital, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed January 21, 2005 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719-54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to the Commission's review of decisions by the Administrator). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-481 ( ? Z j q w z � - tm
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.txt
      • Letter from Jeanene Barnett, Bristow Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 20, 2004 (Request for Review). Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). Letter from Jeanene Barnett, Bristow Public Schools to Universal Service Administrative Company, filed December 21, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (providing that, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, the period to file with the Commission is tolled until the Administrator's review is complete). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator's decisions). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-496 o p q r s � m s s w
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.txt
      • and 97-21, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 12069 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2002); Request for Review by South Barber Unified School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-158897, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 18435 (Com. Car. Bur. 2001). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See, e.g., Request for Waiver by Stephen-Argyle Central School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-228975, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.txt
      • procedures for Funding Year 2003 require that FCC Form 471 Block 6 certifications be postmarked no later than February 6, 2003, in order for the FCC Form 471 to be considered filed in a timely manner. See Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, FCC Form 471, OMB-3060-0806 (December 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See, e.g., Request for Waiver by Stephen-Argyle Central School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-228975, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.txt
      • no later than January 17, 2002, in order for the FCC Form 471 to be considered filed in a timely manner. See Request for Review by Our Lady of Victory Academy, Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File No. SLD-325743, CC Docket No. 06-6, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2389, 2390, para. 4 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2004). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See, e.g., Request for Waiver by Stephen-Argyle Central School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-228975, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 16
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.txt
      • Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R � 54.719(c). See Letter from George Kunkel, Community Consolidated School District 168, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 2, 2004 See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to George Kunkel, Community Consolidated School District 168, dated May 11, 2004. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.txt
      • Science Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 22, 2004 (Request for Review). Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Ismet Isik, Harmony Science Academy, dated July 13, 2004. Any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.txt
      • Jan. 4, 2002). In 2003, the Commission permanently extended the time limit for filing an initial appeal with SLD and the Commission to 60 days. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221, paras. 55-56 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-93 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-93 � t � - � � " � � � � � � � +� � � � � � � � � � � � � � I L � � � � � � � � ` � � � ` � � � � ` � `
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.txt
      • ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b), is WAIVED with regard to Requests for Review filed by Colegio Evangelico Capitan Correa, Colegio Jardin, Colegio Kiany, Guamani Private School, Southwestern Educational Society, and St. Francis School, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.txt
      • September 30 following the close of the applicable funding year, although that deadline may be extended if the applicant satisfies one of four criteria. Section 54.719 of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by a decision of any division of USAC may file an appeal with the relevant committee governing the division or directly with the Commission. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review by the Commission of funding decisions issued by USAC. For those requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001, the appeal must be filed with the Commission or USAC within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.txt
      • after the completion of Friendship House's competitive bidding process, however, it is not applicable for this Request for Review. We therefore look to the Tennessee Order for guidance. Appeal Deadline. Commission rules provide that any person aggrieved by a decision of USAC may file an appeal with the relevant Committee governing the USAC Division or directly with the Commission. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of funding decisions issued by USAC. For those requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001, the appeal must be filed with the Commission or USAC within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. The time
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.txt
      • GRANTED, and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to the Administrator for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from Michael Pill, Special Counsel to the Greenfield Public School District, to Federal Communications Commission, dated October 12, 2005 (Waiver Request). Waiver Request at 2. Id. See also 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). SLD issued the funding commitment decision letters for Greenfield's applications on December 3, 2004. See Letters from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Scott Carbee, Greenfield Public School District, dated December 3, 2004 (Funding Commitment Decision Letters). Greenfield filed its appeal with SLD on July 21, 2005. See Letter from Carol S. Holzberg, Greenfield Public School District,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.txt
      • Association, Inc., Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 15 FCC Rcd 22975 (2001) (Commitment Adjustment Implementation Order) (the Commission established procedures for implementing commitment adjustment recovery actions). See Mastermind Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 4032-4033, para. 10 (concluding that a competitive bidding violation occurred despite the lack of a specific rule addressing the facts at issue). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F. 2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 07-1270 07-1270 p q � � h
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.txt
        • 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170, Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952, 24970, para. 29 (2002). Howe Affidavit at 1. Howe Affidavit at 2; see also, Administrator's Decision at 2. Howe Affidavit, Exh. B (Letter from USAC to Philip Abbenhaus, Big River Telephone Company, LLC, dated July 22, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. For purposes of 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, USAC's invoice is a decision by the Administrator. USAC prints instructions to this effect on the reverse side of each invoice sent to contributors, including information on how to dispute the charges contained on the invoice. Administrator's Decision at 1-2. Id. at 2. Request for Review at 1. Big River indicates that it
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
        • for Ruling under Section 253 of the Communications Act 06/30/09 3060-0862 Handling Confidential Information 06/30/08 3060-0863 Satellite Delivery of Network Signals to Unserved Households for Purposes of the Satellite Home Viewer Act (SHVA) 04/30/09 3060-0865 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Universal Licensing System Recordkeeping and Third-Party Disclosure Requirements 07/31/10 3060-0874 FCC 475B, FCC 2000 Series 09/30/10 3060-0876 Sec. 54.703 and Secs. 54.719, 54.720, 54.721, 54.722, 54.723, 54.724 and 54.725 09/30/09 3060-0881 Sec. 95.861 09/30/08 3060-0882 Sec. 95.833 01/31/09 3060-0888 Secs. 76.7, 76.9, 76.61, 76.914, 76.1003, 76.1302, and 76.1513 05/31/08 3060-0894 Secs. 54.313 and 54.316 and Certification Letter Accounting for Receipt of Federal Support and Rate Comparability Review and Certification 09/30/10 3060-0895 FCC 502 05/31/10 3060-0896 Broadcast Auction Form Exhibits 12/31/08 3060-0900 Compatibility of
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.txt
        • 90 calendar days from release of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS WAIVED to the limited extent described herein in the case of the appeal of Union Baker Education Service District, Island City, Oregon. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102, this Order SHALL
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.txt
        • Clinic Request for Review at 2-3. Letter from Michael O'Connor, Lake Delton Urgent Care, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed May 29, 2008); Letter from Michael O'Connor, Franciscan Skemp Prairie du Chien Clinic, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed May 29, 2008). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.txt
        • with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), section 47. C.F.R. � 54.720 IS WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Don Lawrence, Superintendent, Savannah R-III School District, to Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 02-6 (Dec. 13,
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.txt
        • consideration consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that section 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS WAIVED to the extent provided therein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.txt
        • performing a complete review and analysis of the underlying applications, USAC shall either grant the application, or, if denying the application, provide the applicant with any and all grounds for denial. In addition to waiving the relevant rules and procedures that relate to Harvey's listing the wrong service start date, we note that Harvey was not in violation of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules that establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. USAC noted that Harvey's invoice deadline extension request was postmarked more than 60 days after the date of the Form 486 Notification Letter. See Administrator's Decision on Appeal. While this is true, the event that Harvey was seeking
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.txt
        • St. John the Baptist Catholic School; Request for Review and/or Waiver by The Children's Storefront. Request for Waiver by Hancock County Library System; Request for Waiver by Long Beach Public Library. Request for Waiver by Erie 1 BOCES; Request for Review by Hamblen County School District; Request for Waiver by Yeshiva Ktana Passaic. Request for Review by TIES. Specifically, section 54.720 of the Commission's rules provides parties with 60 days to appeal a decision by USAC to either USAC or the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2007). Prior to September 12, 2001, an appeal was required to be filed with USAC or the Commission within 30 days of the issuance of a decision by USAC. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2002). When
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.txt
        • to the limited extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS WAIVED to the limited extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.txt
        • IS WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that section 47. C.F.R. � 54.720 IS WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), USAC REINSTATE the funding commitment no later
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
        • the filing requirements, review process, and the treatment of disbursements during the pending review process. Need: In implementing statutory requirements for the Universal Service support mechanism, these rules provide the framework and requirements for the review of decisions issued by the Administrator. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 254. Section Number and Title: 54.719 Parties permitted to seek review of Administrator decisions. 54.720 Filing deadlines. 54.721 General filing requirements. 54.722 Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau or the Commission. 54.723 Standard of review. 54.724 Time periods for Commission approval of Administrator decisions. 54.725 Universal service disbursements during pendency of a request for review and Administrator decision. PART 61-TARIFFS SUBPART E-GENERAL RULES FOR DOMINANT CARRIERS Brief Description: The Part 61 rules are designed to
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.txt
        • (1964), aff'd sub. nom. Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967 (1966). Petition at 1. Id. Id. AM Auction Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 10566; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3568(a)(1) and Green Valley Broadcasters, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 13341, 13345-46 (2004) See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.txt
        • had provided all the information needed to complete the task. As to the latter, federal law poses no bar to assessing BitWise (or any other carrier) based on the revenues it reported in compliance with our reporting requirements, rather than based on revenue information reflected in untimely Form 499 filings. (last visited July 15, 2010). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.720(e). Although we deny these requests for review on the merits, at least one request for review is also deficient in that it was filed outside the 60-day window or did not comply with our filing requirements. See BitWise Request for Review (filed electronically 61 days after the USAC decision and failing to comply with the filing requirements set forth in
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.txt
        • the Universal Service Administrator by Academy of Math and Science, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-487009, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, FCC 10-122 (released July 8, 2010) (Academy of Math and Science Order). See appendix A; 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). See appendix B. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Seven petitioners filed appeals with the Commission within 60 days of receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision (Galloway Charter School, Granada-Huntley-East Chain School District #2536, Henderson Memorial Public Library, Lake County High Schools, North Star Academy, Peavey Memorial Library, and Tunstall Middle School). Two other applicants filed their appeals within 14 days (Bethel-Tate Local School District and for St.
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.txt
        • consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that waivers of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, ARE GRANTED to Ahi Ezer Yeshiva School, Buckingham County Public Schools, Derry Co-Op School District, Hancock Library System, Jemez Mountain School District, Long Beach Unified School District, Newmarket School District for FCC Form 471 Application Numbers 474136 and 584028, Newport School District, Philadelphia School District, Savannah River Challenge Program, School Administrative Unit
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.txt
        • Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.504(b), 54.504(c), and 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(b), 54.504(c), and 54.507(c) ARE WAIVED for the petitioners listed in the appendix as provided herein, and that section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS WAIVED for the petitioners listed in footnote 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, that USAC SHALL COMPLETE its review of each remanded application listed in the appendix and
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.txt
        • consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. In addition, we also find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.txt
        • consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), waivers of section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, ARE GRANTED to Academia Bautista de Puerto Nuevo; Davis Joint Unified School District; Dine Southwest High School; Ethel Hedgemen Lyle Middle and High School; Garr Academy of Mathematics and Entrepreneurial Studies; Golden Plains Unified School District; Guam Public School System; Lawrence Public Schools; Live Oak School District; Perry County School District; Perspectives
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.txt
        • before coming to the Commission. Pursuant to the Commission's rules, parties may seek review of USAC decisions with either USAC or the Commission, but there is no requirement that parties first go to USAC before requesting review from the Commission. As such, we deny as moot inContact's request for waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 54.720, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 54.720, and 54.722(a), that the request for review of the decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company filed by inContact, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.3, 54.720, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.720, and
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.txt
        • USAC found that the FCC Forms 486 were filed late or not filed at all. These Petitioners, however, either claim that the late or missed filings were the result of clerical, ministerial, or procedural errors, or were due to circumstances beyond their control. In addition to waiving the FCC Form 486 deadline, we also find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC, for five Petitioners - Children of Peace, Guthrie Job Corps Center, Pojoaque Valley Schools, Saint Paul Public Schools, and Southeast Idaho Rural Vocational Distance Learning Network. Children of Peace School indicates that it was late filing its appeal because it was the
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.txt
        • the E-rate program, eligible schools, libraries, and consortia that include eligible schools and libraries may apply for discounts for eligible telecommunications services, Internet access, and internal connections. The Commission's rules provide that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the relevant committee governing that division or directly from the Commission. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC. For those requests seeking review of decisions issued on or after August 13, 2001, the appeal must have been filed with the Commission or USAC within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. The time
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.txt
        • applicants were late because of errors made by the service provider, and one service provider claims that the applicant failed to schedule its installation on time. Finally, in three appeals, the petitioners argue that they filed their FCC Forms 472 and 474 on time, but never received funding. In addition, for five petitioners, we find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of USAC decisions. Based on the facts and circumstances of these specific cases, we find that good cause exists to grant these appeals. As the Bureau found in the Canon-McMillan Order, we find that complete rejection of these invoices is not warranted, given that the applicants missed
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.txt
        • consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), ARE WAIVED for Bancroft Neurohealth, Montgomery, Alabama; Camden Elementary School, Camden, Ohio; and Massac County Unit School District 1, Metropolis, Illinois to the extent necessary as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX List of Petitioners Applicant Application Number Funding Year
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.txt
        • because the petitioners have failed to show) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 342.049 Tm 108 Tz (special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline.) Tj 1 0 0 1 109.4 318.5 Tm 93 Tz (2.) Tj 1 0 0 1 145.4 318.549 Tm 107 Tz (Section) Tj 1 0 0 1 180.95 318.549 Tm /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.720) Tj 1 0 0 1 214.05 318.25 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Commission's rules establishes deadlines for affected parties to) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 305.799 Tm (seek review of decisions issued by USAC.3 The appeal must have been filed with the Commission or) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 292.849 Tm (USAC within 60 days
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.txt
        • in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), ARE WAIVED for Burlington Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School to the extent necessary as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.txt
        • consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), ARE WAIVED for Canutillo Independent School District, Texas; Danex Systems, Inc. (FCC Form 471 application number 449656), Brooklyn, New York; Hamilton/Clermont Cooperative Association, Ohio; Pearl River Public School, New York; and Preble Shawnee Local School District, Ohio, to the extent necessary as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.txt
        • Department of Information Systems, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 02-6, filed Aug. 22, 2011 (Petition for Reconsideration). Section 1.106(b)(1) of the Commission's rules provides that any person whose interests are adversely affected by an action taken by the Commission or its designated authority may seek reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b)(1) (2011). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2011); Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Boston Renaissance School, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD- 735147, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, DA 11-1240 (Wireline Comp. Bur. rel. July 27, 2011) (Boston Renaissance Order) (denying 50 appeals on the grounds that the petitioners
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.txt
        • 2011\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 432.7 213.399 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (\(Boston Renaissance) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 201.85 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (School Order\); 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 174.7 200.449 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 182.15 201.85 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (54.720 \(2011\). The E-rate program is more formally known as the schools and libraries) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 190.6 Tm (universal service support program.) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.6 173.049 Tm (Letter from Christopher L. Shearer, Franklin County Schools, to the Office of the Secretary, Federal) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 161.549 Tm (Communications Commission, CC Docket
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.txt
        • Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 415.449 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (We also grant a waiver to Lower Merion because it missed the deadline for filing its appeal with the Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 404.199 Tm 102 Tz (by three days. Section) Tj 1 0 0 1 163.4 404.199 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.720) Tj 1 0 0 1 193.65 403.949 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Commission's rules provides parties with 60 days to appeal a decision by) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 392.399 Tm 101 Tz (USAC to either USAC or the Commission. 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 289.65 390.799 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�)
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.txt
        • /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (1.106\(a\)\(1\) \(2011\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 66.7 222.5 Tm 53 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (2) Tj 1 0 0 1 85.2 217.949 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 114.45 216.299 Tm 72 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 121.65 218.199 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (54.720 \(2011\);) Tj 1 0 0 1 183.6 218.199 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Request for Waiver and Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administration by) Tj 1 0 0 1 66 206.649 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Agra Public Schools 1-134, et al, File No. SLD-363747, et a!., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 5684)
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.txt
        • the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c) IS WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), IS WAIVED for Animas School District 6; Appleton Area School District; Aurora Public School; Beecher Community School District; Caldwell Independent School District; City Charter High School; Gooding Public Schools; Paterson School District; Saint John Vianney Cure of Ars School; Sheboygan Area School District; St. Francis De Sales School; Teach Wisconsin; Tornillo Independent
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.txt
        • for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.504(d) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(c)(1)(iii) and 54.720, ARE WAIVED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that USAC
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.txt
        • GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that sections 54.507(d) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.507(d), 54.720, ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, that USAC SHALL COMPLETE its review and ISSUE approvals of the applicants' requests for the extension
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.txt
        • 2. 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Request for Review by Advantage Telecommunications Corp. of Action by Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5088, 5089, para. 5 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (``Contributors are on notice that we may deny future appeals for procedural defects.''). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). See Letter from USAC to Jose L. Solana, Counsel for Dorial Telecom, LLC, at 4-5 (dated Nov. 24, 2009). Dorial Request for Review at 2 n. 1. (continued . . .) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-486 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-486 � � � � � d e � � � � � � � � d e � �
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.txt
        • action consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release date of this order. In addition, we also find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules for Greater Albany and Lincoln County. Although Greater Albany's appeal was filed late, the district filed the appeal as soon they received actual notice of the denial. Lincoln County's appeal was only two days late. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934,
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.txt
        • Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Argos Public Library, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-737946, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 16109 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2010). See appendix A; 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). See appendix B; 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. Al-Noor School appears to have attempted to file its FCC Form 471 application on time, on Friday, February 19, 2010, but, due to an apparent technical problem with USAC's website, the application was not accepted. Therefore, after speaking with USAC on the following Monday, Al-Noor filed a paper version of its application on Tuesday, February 23, 2010. Letter from Hamid
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.txt
        • accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that sections 54.504(c) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(c) and 54.720, ARE WAIVED to the extent necessary as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.txt
        • further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that waivers of section 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, ARE GRANTED to Eastchester Union Free School District, Eastchester, NY; Elizabeth Board of Education, Elizabeth, NJ; Hall-Dale Schools, SAD #16, Farmingdale, ME; Milton Town School District, Milton, VT; Tarek Ibn Ziyad Academy, Inver Grove Heights, MN; Windsor Elementary School. Windsor, IL; and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.txt
        • GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that sections 54.507(d) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d), 54.720, ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, that USAC SHALL COMPLETE its review of the remanded application and ISSUE an award or a
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.txt
        • by the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) to dismiss Sacred Heart's appeal to USAC because it was postmarked more that 60 days after the date on an FCC Form 471 Outside of Window letter. On our own motion, we reconsider the SAU 41 Order and waive the appeal filing deadline for Sacred Heart. While 54.720(c) of the Commission's rules stipulates that appeals must be submitted within 60 days of the decision being appealed, Sacred Heart filed its appeal only a few days late. Turning to the merits, we find that Sacred Heart has demonstrated special circumstances to justify a waiver of the E-rate program's FCC Form 471 filing deadline. Consistent with the Bureau's decision in
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.txt
        • the grounds that petitioners failed to submit their appeals either to the Commission or to USAC within 60 days as required by the Commission's rules). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c) (2011). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2011). The Commission may waive any provision of its rules for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2011). � � kdC � % 7 > C M N b q x } � � � � � � � � � % 7 > C M N b q x } � � � � � � � �
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.txt
        • deny five requests from petitioners seeking review of decisions made by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) under the E-rate program (more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program). In each case, USAC refused to permit petitioners to make changes to their applications after they had submitted them. We first grant four petitioners waivers of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules because we find they submitted their appeals to the Commission, or filed a service change request with USAC, within a reasonable period of time of actual notice of a clerical error or a decision by USAC not to correct the error. Based on our review of the record, we find that 12 petitioners have demonstrated that
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.txt
        • an appeal of a denial of funding is likely to cause petitioners to miss the program's subsequent procedural deadlines in that funding year. We also find good cause to waive section 54.504(a) of the Commission's rules to allow Marian High School to amend its FCC Form 471 regarding the telephone service it requested. Consistent with precedent, we also waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules for Van Alstyne Independent School District. We therefore remand the underlying applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application listed in the appendix and issue an award or a denial based
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.txt
        • universal service support program.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 95.799 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (See) Tj 1 0 0 1 90.95 95.799 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 133.4 93.899 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 140.849 95.799 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.720.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 73.949 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Request for Waiver by Idabel School District) Tj 1 0 0 1 259.9 73.949 Tm 69 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (5) Tj 1 0 0 1 267.35 73.949 Tm 90 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and Request for Waiver by Otsego Nothem Catskills BOCES.) Tj ET endstream endobj
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.txt
        • for further processing. Upon remand, USAC shall provide these petitioners, listed in appendix B, with a limited 15-day opportunity to file additional documentation to support their calculations of the correct discount rates. In addition, we direct USAC to accept information already provided by the applicants that USAC had deemed late. Consistent with precedent, we also grant two waivers of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules establishing deadlines for the filing of appeals. On our own motion, we also waive section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules and any USAC procedural deadlines, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. We find good cause to waive section 54.507(d) because filing an appeal of a denial is likely to
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.txt
        • Commission's rules and any USAC procedural deadlines, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. We find good cause to waive section 54.507(d) because filing an appeal of a denial of funding is likely to cause petitioners to miss the program's subsequent procedural deadlines in that funding year. Consistent with precedent, we also waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules for two petitioners. We therefore remand the underlying applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of the applications listed in the appendix and issue an award or a denial based on a complete
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.txt
        • Commission's rules and any USAC procedural deadlines, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. We find good cause to waive section 54.507(d) because filing an appeal of a denial of funding is likely to cause petitioners to miss the program's subsequent procedural deadlines in that funding year. Consistent with precedent, we also waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules for Clarendon County School District because we find they submitted their appeal to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision. We therefore remand the underlying applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.txt
        • the petitioners have failed to show special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline). The requests for waiver and review are listed in the appendix. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. The Commission may waive any provision of its rules for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.txt
        • Order, 18 FCC Rcd 26407, 26424, para. 40 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.503(c)(4). See Aberdeen School District Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8763, para. 9 (waiving the Commission's competitive bidding rules for petitioners who, while not waiting the the full 28 days before entering into a contract, missed that deadline by a minimal number of days). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (requiring appeal within 60 days of a decision by USAC. See also Requests for Review and/or Waiver of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by ABC Unified School District, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-584091, Order, 26 FCC Rcd 11019, 11019, para. 2 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2011) (granting petitioners waivers of our filing deadline
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.txt
        • with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that sections 54.503(c)(2)(iii)-(iv), 54.504(a)(1)(iv)-(v), 54.507(d), 54.508 and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.503(c)(2)(iii)-(iv), 54.504(a)(1)(iv)-(v), 54.507(d), 54.508 and 54.720 ARE WAIVED for the petitioners listed in the appendix to the limited extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader, Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Academy of Excellence Phoenix, Arizona 523299 2006 Nov.
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.txt
        • of USAC's filing deadline and allow the applicants another opportunity to respond to USAC's requests for further information. We also dismiss an appeal filed by Yeshiva Mesivta Wiznitz USA (Yeshiva) because its funding request was fulfilled by USAC after it filed its appeal. Consistent with precedent, we also waive, for Warren Consolidated School District (Warren) and Northwest Institute (Northwest), section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which requires applicants to seek review of a USAC decision within 60 days, because we find they submitted their appeals to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision or filed their appeal only a few days late. We therefore remand the underlying applications listed in the appendices
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.txt
        • Commission's rules and any USAC procedural deadlines, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. We find good cause to waive section 54.507(d) because filing an appeal of a denial of funding is likely to cause petitioners to miss the program's subsequent procedural deadlines in that funding year. Consistent with precedent, we also waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which requires applicants to seek review of a USAC decision within 60 days, for Lakeview Local Schools because we find they submitted their appeal to the Commission only three days late. We therefore remand the applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. To ensure that those applications are resolved
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.txt
        • accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that sections 54.503(c)(2)(iii)-(iv), 54.504(a)(1)(iv)-(v), 54.507(d) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.503(c)(2)(iii)-(iv), 54.504(a)(1)(iv)-(v), 54.507(d) and 54.720 ARE WAIVED for Milburn Public Schools' funding request numbers 1274660 and 1274682 to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91,
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.txt
        • After receiving notice of USAC's decision, Marconi promptly filed an appeal with USAC and, subsequently, a request for waiver with the Commission. Therefore, we find that Marconi made a good faith effort to comply with the Commission's rules as soon as it realized that USAC had issued a decision. Accordingly, we waive the 60-day deadline for filing appeals in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules. We also find that a waiver of the filing deadline in the instant matter is in the public interest because Marconi should prevail on the merits of its appeal. In 2001, Marconi delivered and installed internal connections equipment for the Heritage Charter School (HCS). USAC subsequently conducted an audit of HCS and determined that the school
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.txt
        • not at all. Based on our review of the record, we find that Annunciation School and Hamilton County have demonstrated that good cause exists to justify a waiver of USAC's filing deadline for the FCC Forms 472 or 474 and allow the petitioners to file or resubmit their invoicing forms. Consistent with precedent, we also waive, for Hamilton County, section 54.720 of the Commission's rules which requires applicants to seek review of a USAC decision within 60 days because we find Hamilton County submitted its appeal to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision. We dismiss as moot the request for review filed by Optimized VDV, Inc. (Optimized) because, on appeal, USAC
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.txt
        • the petitioners have failed to show special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline). The requests for waiver and/or review are listed in the Appendix. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. The Commission may waive any provision of its rules for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.txt
        • Paragraph 4 is corrected to read as follows: ``IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.720(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a), ARE WAIVED for Burlington Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School to the extent necessary as provided herein.'' FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission � � $ m m :
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-376A1.txt
        • be filed on or after September 12, 2001 and that were or are received by the Commission on or after September 12, 2001 in accordance with the procedures set forth in amended rule 1.4(f). Part 54 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 1. Section is amended by adding at the end of section 54.720(e): 54.720 Filing Deadlines. ****** (e) ****** Note: Due to the emergency events in Washington, D.C. resulting in the interruption of regular mail delivery, until further notice, requests for review pursuant to sections 720(a), (b), (c), or (d) shall be filed within 60 days from the date of the issuance of the relevant decision, and may be filed electronically via either
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.txt
        • Alaska Order, para. 17. Eighth Order on Reconsideration. See, e.g., Request for Review by Copan Public Schools of the Universal Service Administrator, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-26231, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd. 5498 (2000). 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.720(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(a), 54.720(b). In October 1998, the Board of Directors (Board) of the predecessor corporation to USAC with responsibility for the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism authorized staff to process appeals in accordance with principles set forth by the Board and by the Schools and Libraries Committee of the Board. 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.720(a). We
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.txt
        • using the postmarked date furthers the goals of improving program operation and ensuring a fair and equitable distribution of the benefits of the program. Thus, we find that it is consistent with public interest that we treat appeals to the Administrator or the Commission as having been filed on the date they are postmarked. We therefore add a new section 54.720(e) to our rules. Docket Number Change We adopt a minor procedural amendment conforming our rules to reflect the change in docket numbers for filing appeals. Specifically, we change the wording of section 54.721, which describes the filing requirements for requests for reviews for the entire Universal Service program, to replace the last line of paragraph (a) as follows: instead of
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-72A1.txt
        • Decision Letter, it contacted its service provider for information and the service provider was not responsive. 4. Under delegated authority from the Commission, the Bureau reviewed the appeal. In the Bureau Order, the Bureau affirmed SLD's decision, finding that Mescalero's appeal to SLD was not filed within the requisite 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules. The Bureau also denied Mescalero's request for waiver of the Commission's rules, concluding that Mescalero had not demonstrated special circumstances necessary to warrant a deviation from the general rule. Having concluded that the initial appeal was untimely, the Bureau Order did not address the merits of SLD's underlying decision in the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. 5.
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-150A1.txt
        • for paying service provider invoices); On-Tech Comments at 5 (recommending seven days for invoice processing). See AT&T Reply Comments at 3-4. Average time; measured from the date the invoice is submitted to the date payment is issued. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719. The request for review must be filed within 60 days from the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). CGCS Comments at 13; HITN Comments at 4; Qwest Comments at 12; HITN Reply Comments at 2; Qwest Reply Comments at 11 (suggesting that the Administrator should have firm deadlines); SDDE Reply Comments at 8-9. See, e.g., GCI Comments at 28; HITN Comments at 4 (recommends 60 days); ISTE Comments at 25 (recommends 90 days); Kellogg Comments at 10 (six
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.txt
        • 0 0 1 229.2 231.149 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 271.199 229.5 Tm 72 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 283.65 231.149 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.719-54.725,) Tj 1 0 0 1 351.1 231.149 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (For purposes of 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, USAC's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 219.6 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (invoice is a decision by the Administrator. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Request for Review) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 207.85 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (by Big River Telephone Company, LLC, Order, 22 FCC Rcd. 4974, 4976, at n. 17 \(Wireline
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992144.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992144.txt
        • 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order grants the Request for Review of United School District 217, in Rolla, Kansas (USD 217), that was received by the Commission on July 12, 1999. USD 217's Request for Review seeks review of the Universal Service Administrative Company's (USAC or Administrator) Decision on Appeal, dated June 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's Rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the funding commitment decision for which review is sought. Because USD 217's appeal to USAC was not filed within 30 days of USAC's funding commitment decision, USAC rejected USD 217's appeal as untimely filed. In this Order, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) reverses USAC's Decision on
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992202.txt
        • �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- �-�Ct- ���x ��x � �This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal dated May 18, 1999 by the Methacton School District (Methacton). The Letter of Appeal seeks review concerning funding requests made by Methacton for Arcola Intermediate School (Arcola) and Audubon Elementary School (Audubon). Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision for which review is �With respect to Arcola Intermediate School, the relevant Administrator's Decision on Appeal was dated April 13, 1999. Therefore, the Arcola portion of the appeal was not filed within the specified 30 day period, and will be dismissed
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992219.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992219.txt
        • its appeal to the Administrator should be considered timely. Specifically, St. Margaret's-McTernan states that: (1) the January 19, 1999 SLD letter did not specify a 30-day requirement for filing appeals, and (2) the appeal process was not announced on the SLD website until March 9, 1999, which was the first time it became aware of the 30-day requirement. . Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules requires schools to seek review of an SLD initial decision within 30 days of the issuance of that decision. St. Margaret's-McTernan, by its own admission, filed its Letter of Appeal with the Administrator no earlier than March 10, 1999. Therefore, because St. Margaret's-McTernan filed its Letter of Appeal with the Administrator outside the specified 30-day period,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992239.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992239.txt
        • Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 20, 1999 Released: October 20, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Bremerton School District 100-C, of Bremerton, Washington, that was received by the Commission on June 4, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated April 30, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992242.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992242.txt
        • Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 20, 1999 Released: October 20, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Monrovia Consortium, of East Palo Alto, California, that was received by the Commission on August 9, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated July 7, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992365.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992365.txt
        • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 29, 1999 Released: October 29, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Lancaster County Public Schools of Kilmarnock, Virginia, that was received by the Commission on August 2, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated June 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992366.txt
        • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 29, 1999 Released: October 29, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Norfolk Public Schools of Norfolk, Virginia, that was received by the Commission on August 2, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated June 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992486.doc
        • Appeal of Kristina J. Lewis, Havana Community Unit Schools District 126, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (date unknown, received August 11, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Kristina J. Lewis, Havana Community Unit Schools District 126, to Appeals Committee, Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company (date unknown, received August 9, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Notably, even if HCUSD had not filed a previous appeal with USAC, this appeal to the Commission would have been untimely in any event.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992488.doc
        • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: November 9, 1999 Released: November 9, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Independence Unified School District 446, Independence, Kansas, that was received by the Commission on June 14, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 10, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992590.doc
        • appeal from the Pediatric Library of Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital (Rainbow), Cleveland, Ohio, that was received by the Commission on June 24, 1999. In its Letter of Appeal, Rainbow asserts that it filed a timely appeal of a decision by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) consistent with the requirements of section 54.720, and therefore the merits of its request for review of SLD's initial decision denying certain discounts should be considered by the Commission. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss Rainbow's Letter of Appeal to the Commission. 2. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of SLD's decisions require affected parties to seek an appeal within thirty days of the issuance of
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992591.doc
        • National Exchange Carrier ) Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 19, 1999 Released: November 19, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Peoria Public Schools (Peoria) that was received by the Commission on June 25, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 25, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992611.doc
        • Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Brighton New York School District that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 26, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992612.doc
        • Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Cotulla Independent School District dated June 25, 1999, but received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 26, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992613.doc
        • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Forsyth County Schools that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 26, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992615.doc
        • No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Pioneerland Library System, received by the Commission on June 25, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 14, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992617.doc
        • Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: November 22, 1999 Released: November 22, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Spencer East Brookfield Regional School District that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 25, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992727.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992727.txt
        • Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Imogene Horse, Director, and Dana Crews, Technical Services Librarian, Chadron Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, dated August 30, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Imogene Horse, Director, and Dana Crews, Technical Services Librarian, Chadron Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, dated August 30, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992728.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992728.txt
        • date its Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Horton appeals that decision. In the appeal before us, Horton argues that its appeal before the SLD was erroneously denied for untimeliness because Horton mailed its appeal on August 5, 1999, two days prior to the 30-day deadline. Horton also notes the hardship resulting from the denial of its appeal. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted in the Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued by the Administrator to Horton, ``[i]f you wish to appeal to
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992729.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992729.txt
        • December 6, 1999 Released: December 6, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Logandale Middle School, Chicago, Illinois, seeking review a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 31, 1999. The Commission received Logandale's Letter of Appeal on September 10, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992730.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992730.txt
        • December 6, 1999 Released: December 6, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letters of Appeal of the Yeshiva of Central Queens, of Flushing, New York, that were received by the Commission on September 13, 1999 and September 21, 1999, which seek review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated July 13, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letters of Appeal were not filed within the specified 30-day period, they
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992772.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992772.txt
        • 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Regional Educational Media Center, submitted on behalf of the Copper Country Intermediate School District of Hancock, Michigan, which was received by the Commission on September 13, 1999. The instant Letter of Appeal seeks review of an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, which is dated August 11, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992785.doc
        • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 13, 1999 Released: December 13, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Sacred Heart Parish School that was received by the Commission on September 15, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 11, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992796.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992796.txt
        • with specified filing deadlines. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 20, 1999 by Carolina Friends School IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b); see also "SLD Procedure for Post-Commitment Appeals" at http://www.sl.universalservice/org/reference/appeals.asp. ("To submit a letter of appeal to the SLD": 1. Write a letter and submit it by mail to the SLD so that is received no later than 30 days after the date your FCD Letter was issued.") (emphasis in original). Appeal Letter at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992797.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992797.txt
        • CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Foxcroft Academy, received by the Commission on September 20, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 18, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992799.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992799.txt
        • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Lincoln Intermediate Unit that was received by the Commission on September 24, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 24, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992800.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992800.txt
        • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Putnam City Schools, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma received by the Commission on October 19, 1999, which seeks review of the SLD's Funding Commitment Letter, dated February 9, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992802.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992802.txt
        • ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the White Oak Public School District dated September 15, 1999, but received by the Commission on September 21, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 18, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992803.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992803.txt
        • Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: December 14, 1999 Released: December 14, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of St. John - St. James Lutheran School, Reedsville, Wisconsin, received by the Commission on September 17, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 11, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992831.doc
        • 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of John Curtis Christian Schools, River Ridge, Louisiana, that was received by the Commission on September 17, 1999, which seeks review of a decision issued on August 10, 1999, by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator). Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992832.doc
        • ORDER Adopted: December 16, 1999 Released: December 17, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Morton Memorial Schools that was received by the Commission on September 17, 1999, which seeks review of the Universal Service Administrative Company's (USAC or Administrator) Decision on Appeal, dated August 11, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. �1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992833.doc
        • 16, 1999 Released: December 17, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review of the School District of the Borough of Wilkinsburg (Wilkinsburg), Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania that was received by the Commission June 8, 1999, which seeks review of the Universal Service Administrative Company's (USAC or Administrator) Decision on Appeal, dated April 16, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. In its Request for Review, Wilkinsburg states that it did not receive any notification of
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000016.doc
        • response, the Administrator issued a Decision on Appeal, stating that it would not be able to consider Madison's Letter of Appeal because it was not received by SLD within 30 days of the date of the SLD decision letter as required by the Commission's rules. Subsequently, Madison filed the instant request for review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules requires schools to seek review of an SLD initial decision within 30 days of the issuance of that decision. In order to timely appeal the August 3, 1999 decision letter, Madison was required to have filed its appeal by September 2, 1999. Because Madison filed its Letter of Appeal with the Administrator outside of the specified
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000017.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000017.txt
        • National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: January 6, 2000 Released: January 7, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Mark Twain Union Elementary School District, that was received by the Commission on September 27, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated August 6, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000021.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000021.txt
        • dated August 16, 1999; Letter of Appeal from Wayne F. Moss, Trinity County Office of Education, on behalf of Weaverville Elementary School District, to Schools and Libraries Corporation, dated August 16, 1999; Letter of Appeal from Wayne F. Moss, Trinity County Office of Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, dated September 28, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000041.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000041.txt
        • Released: January 11, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Butts County Schools, Jackson, Georgia, which seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company on May 25, 1999. The Commission received Butts County's Letter of Appeal on June 28, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000042.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000042.txt
        • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: January 10, 2000 Released: January 11, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Denison Independent School District of Denison, Texas that was received by the Commission on June 28, 1999, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, dated May 11, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000084.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000084.txt
        • of the ) National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) CC Docket No. 97-21 ORDER Adopted: January 14, 2000 Released: January 18, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed October 4, 1999 by the North Central Area Schools, which seeks review of a decision of the Administrator, dated August 31, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000085.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000085.txt
        • Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Kathy Hicks, Technology Coordinator, River Road Independent School District, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (dated November 13, 1999, received November 16, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Kathy Hicks, Technology Coordinator, River Road Independent School District, to Schools & Libraries Division (dated November 13, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000174.doc
        • February 8, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Bradford Community Unit School District #1, that was received by the Commission on October 22, 1999, which seeks review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) on July 8, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000175.doc
        • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Frederick Smeigh, Frazier School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 26, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Frederick Smeigh, Frazier School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, the Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 26, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000176.doc
        • Corporation, filed August 9, 1999; Letter of Appeal from Jane Kellogg, Kellogg Consulting, L.L.C., on behalf of Swink School District 21, to Schools and Libraries Corporation, filed August 9, 1999; Letter of Appeal from Jane Kellogg, Kellogg Consulting, L.L.C., on behalf of Tyrone Independent School District 53, to Schools and Libraries Division, filed September 30, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000287.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000287.txt
        • of the ) National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) CC Docket No. 97-21 ) ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2000 Released: February 16, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed November 17, 1999 by Binas Yisaschor, which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal issued June 22, 1999. Under 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000288.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000288.txt
        • Released: February 16, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Reedsville School District (Reedsville) of Reedsville, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 21, 1999. The Commission received Reedsville's Letter of Appeal on November 23, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000289.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000289.txt
        • Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) CC Docket No. 97-21 ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2000 Released: February 16, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. The Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) has under consideration a Letter of Appeal received December 16, 1999, from Stanton Public Library (Stanton), which seeks review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, issued June 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000329.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000329.txt
        • February 22, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the McMinnville SDA Elementary School (McMinnville) of McMinnville, Oregon, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 9, 1999. The Commission received McMinnville's Letter of Appeal on December 22, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000330.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000330.txt
        • February 22, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the LaSalle Academy of New York, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 1999. The Commission received LaSalle Academy's Letter of Appeal on November 12, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000331.doc
        • By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Rio Grande School (Rio Grande) of Santa Fe, New Mexico, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on October 26, 1999. The Commission received Rio Grande's Letter of Appeal on December 16, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000332.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000332.txt
        • By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Southwest Dubois County School Corporation (Southwest Dubois) of Huntingburg, Indiana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 30, 1999. The Commission received Southwest Dubois's Letter of Appeal on November 1, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000382.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000382.txt
        • February 25, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Alamo Heights Independent School District (Alamo), San Antonio, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on October 26, 1999. The Commission received Alamo's Letter of Appeal on November 26, 1999. Under Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000424.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000424.txt
        • COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letters of Appeal of Randy Ackerman, Holcomb Unified School District, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed December 6, 1999, December 13, 1999). See Letters of Appeal of Randy Ackerman, Holcomb Unified School District, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed December 7, 1999, December 9, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000425.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000425.txt
        • 2000 by Kasson-Mantorville Schools, Kasson, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of James Turner, Kasson-Mantorville Schools, to Federal Communications Commission (filed January 10, 2000). See Letter of Appeal of James Turner, Kasson-Mantorville Schools, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed October 28, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000426.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000426.txt
        • DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Ronald J. Maniglia, Principal, Sacred Heart School, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed November 26, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Ronald Maniglia, Principal, Sacred Heart School, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed August 20, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000427.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000427.txt
        • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Scott R. Brown, Director of Business Service, McFarland School District, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed January 11, 2000). See Letter of Appeal of Dave Pedersen, Director of Technology Services, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed September 20, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000428.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000428.txt
        • Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Nathaniel Hawthorne, Attorney, to Federal Communications Commission (filed December 9, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Nathaniel Hawthorne, Attorney, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed with Schools and Libraries Division on December 9, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000497.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000497.txt
        • Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letters of Appeal of Lonnie E. Palmer, City School District of Albany, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed December 9, 1999, January 14, 2000). See Letters of Appeal of Lonnie E. Palmer, City School District of Albany, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed December 2, 1999, January 12, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000529.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000529.txt
        • By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Newman Grove Public Schools (Newman Grove) of Newman Grove, Nebraska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 18, 1999. The Commission received Newman Grove's Letter of Appeal on December 30, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000530.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000530.txt
        • School District, Hanover, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Dr. Barbara Rupp, Superintendent, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed November 16, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Dr. Barbara Rupp, Superintendent, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed November 15, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000560.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000560.txt
        • IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Michael S. Pruitt, District Technology Coordinator, to Office of the Secretary, FCC (filed November 1, 1999). See Letter of Appeal of Michael S. Pruitt, District Technology Coordinator, to Schools & Libraries Division (filed November 1, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000610.doc
        • 20, 2000 Released: March 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Bemidji (Bemidji), Bemidji, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on October 1, 1999. The Commission received Bemidji's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000611.doc
        • 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Detroit Lakes (Detroit Lakes), Detroit Lakes, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on October 1, 1999. The Commission received Detroit Lakes's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000612.doc
        • 2000 Released: March 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Hillsboro (Hillsboro), Hillsboro, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on October 1, 1999. The Commission received Hillsboro's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000613.doc
        • 2000 Released: March 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Jamestown (Jamestown), Jamestown, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on October 1, 1999. The Commission received Jamestown's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000614.doc
        • 2000 Released: March 21, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the MeritCare Clinic Mayville (Mayville), Mayville, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Rural Health Care Division on November 12, 1999. The Commission received Mayville's Letter of Appeal on January 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000732.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000732.txt
        • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dave Beckman, Lamont School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed January 6, 2000) (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Dave Beckman, Lamont School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company (filed January 3, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000761.doc
        • Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator). The SLD refused to consider Amelia's appeal of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter because the appeal was received more than 30 days after the date of issuance of the letter. Amelia requests review of the SLD's action. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Amelia's appeal. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter denying Amelia's request for discounted services under the schools and libraries support mechanism
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000762.doc
        • not consider West County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. West County now appeals that decision, arguing that its request for corrections to its funding commitments were not intended to ``appeal'' an SLD decision, but rather to request the correction of alleged errors in the SLD's calculations. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000837.doc
        • Appeal from Velma D. Eisenberger, Principal, United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, to Federal Communications Commission (filed February 3, 2000). See Letter of Appeal from Velma D. Eisenberger, Principal, United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company (filed September 14, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000838.doc
        • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Elk Grove Village Public Library (Elk Grove Village) of Elk Grove Village, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 15, 2000. The Commission received Elk Grove Village's Letter of Appeal on March 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000851.doc
        • the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Highland Community School District of Ainsworth - Riverside (Highland) of Riverside, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 3, 1999. The Commission received Highland's Letter of Appeal on November 1, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000852.doc
        • its appeal when, in fact, three funding decision commitment letters (application numbers 142293, 123302, and 124574) were issued October 5, 1999. The November 1 letter of appeal was received within the 30-day deadline established by the October 5, 1999, issuance of the funding commitment letters. With respect to Vancouver's appeal from the August 17 funding commitment decision letter, under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted in the funding commitment decision letter issued by the Administrator to Vancouver, ``[i]f you wish to appeal to the
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001059.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001059.txt
        • 2000. This Order dismisses, as untimely, Central Intermediate's Letter of Appeal to the extent that it seeks review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's (USAC or Administrator) Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on May 19, 1999 for Application Number 108215. As noted, the Commission received Central Intermediate's Letter of Appeal on February 14, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001233.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001233.txt
        • funding request had been omitted from the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. On February 25, 2000, the SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Flora's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Flora subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001277.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001277.txt
        • Blessed Sacrament School, Washington, DC, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Schools and Libraries Corporation, filed April 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001278.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001278.txt
        • or Administrator) on November 2, 1999. Because Brevard County failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Brevard County's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on November 2, 1999. The instant Letter of Appeal was filed with
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001279.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001279.txt
        • 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Calallen Independent School District (Calallen), Corpus Christi, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 1, 1999. The Commission received Calallen's Letter of Appeal on February 29, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001280.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001280.txt
        • 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Casa Grande Union High School (Casa Grande), Casa Grande, Arizona, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 21, 1999. The Commission received Casa Grande's Letter of Appeal on February 23, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001281.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001281.txt
        • 13, 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Covina-Valley Unified School District (Covina-Valley), Covina, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 17, 2000. The Commission received Covina-Valley's Letter of Appeal on March 27, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001282.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001282.txt
        • June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Enlarged City School District of Troy (Troy), Troy, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 19, 2000. The Commission received Troy's Letter of Appeal on February 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001283.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001283.txt
        • Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Kerkhoven-Murdock-Sunburg Independent School District No. 775 (Kerkhoven), Kerkhoven, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Kerkhoven's Letter of Appeal on May 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001284.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001284.txt
        • 2000 Released: June 14, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by the Milwaukee Jewish Day School (MJDS), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 17, 1999. The Commission received MJDS's Letter of Appeal on December 14, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001285.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001285.txt
        • issue here is dated February 16, 2000, but North Chicago has provided a postmark indicating that the letter was not actually issued until March 20, 2000. SLD has confirmed this error. See Letter from Tyrone Pipkin, North Chicago Community Unit School District #187, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 23, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001365.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001365.txt
        • June 23, 2000 Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Austin Public Library (Austin), Austin, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 14, 2000. The Commission received Austin's Letter of Appeal on March 22, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001366.txt
        • it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. B. F. Jones filed another appeal with SLD on September 20, 1999. On March 20, 2000, SLD again declined to reconsider B. F. Jones' request for review of FRN 170032. B. F. Jones subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001367.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001367.txt
        • June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Des Moines Independent School District (Des Moines), Des Moines, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 1, 2000. The Commission received Des Moines' Letter of Appeal on June 7, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001369.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001369.txt
        • Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Gridley Unified School District (Gridley Unified), Gridley, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2000. The Commission received Gridley Unified 's Letter of Appeal on June 7, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001370.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001370.txt
        • Madison filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its application. On March 1, 2000, the SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Madison's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Madison subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001371.doc
        • 2000 Released: June 28, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Nicolet Distance Education Network (Nicolet Network), Rhinelander, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 26, 2000. The Commission received Nicolet Network's Letter of Appeal on June 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001372.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001372.txt
        • February 25, 2000, Pinellas filed appeals with SLD, requesting reconsideration of certain funding commitment decisions. The SLD issued several Administrator's Decisions on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Pinellas' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Pinellas subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001373.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001373.txt
        • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 202675. On March 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Queen of Peace's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Queen of Peace subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or the SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001374.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001374.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 279716. On March 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Red Wing's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Red Wing subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001375.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001375.txt
        • 2000 Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint Cecilia School (St. Cecilia), Ames, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2000. The Commission received St. Cecilia's Letter of Appeal on May 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001376.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001376.txt
        • Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy DivisionDeputy Chief,: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint Paul's School (St. Paul's), Wilmington, Delaware, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received St. Paul's Letter of Appeal on May 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001377.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001377.txt
        • 23, 2000 Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of Algonquin Regional High School (Algonquin) of Northboro, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 22, 1999. The Commission received Algonquin's Letter of Appeal on February 12, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001378.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001378.txt
        • DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Margaret Ford, St. Michael School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 24, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter from Margaret Ford, St. Michael School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 28, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001379.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001379.txt
        • 23, 2000 Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Stratford Board of Education (Stratford), Stratford, Connecticut, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 22, 1999. The Commission received Stratford's Letter of Appeal on March 9, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. that the
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001380.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001380.txt
        • Released: June 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Talmud Torah Siach Yitzchok (Talmud), Far Rockaway, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Talmud's Letter of Appeal on May 30, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001510.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001510.txt
        • on its application and would like consideration for the services. On October 27, 1999, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Battle Lake's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Battle Lake subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001511.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001511.txt
        • 2000, Dearborn filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 233020. On March 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Dearborn's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dearborn subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001512.txt
        • filed a request for review to supplement its application for discounted services. On March 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Minneapolis' request because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Minneapolis subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001513.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001513.txt
        • Lady filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On October 27, 1999, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Our Lady's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Our Lady subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001514.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001514.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 289285. On March 26, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Oxford Hills' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Oxford Hills subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001515.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001515.txt
        • Adopted: July 7, 2000 Released: July 11, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Wathena Unified School District 406 (Wathena), Wathena, Kansas, on April 11, 2000. Wathena seeks review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 9, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001516.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001516.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 278849. On March 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider York County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. York County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001546.doc
        • The SLD decisions related only to FRN 232501 and FRN 232509 and did not dismiss Eastland's appeal regarding FRN 232503. On February 3, 2000, Eastland filed the instant appeal with the Commission regarding the two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal as well as FRN 232503. In the appeal before us, Eastland requests reconsideration of its application for discounted services. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal of a funding commitment decision must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted in the Funding Commitment Decision Letter to Eastland, ``[i]f you wish to appeal to the SLD, your appeal must be
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001547.doc
        • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James Konantz, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 18, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter from George Beckwith, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed November 5, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001620.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001620.txt
        • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Carle Place Union Free School District (Carle Place), Carle Place, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 22, 1999. The Commission received Carle Place's Letter of Appeal on March 22, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001621.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001621.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 189111. On February 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Cerebral Palsy's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Cerebral Palsy subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001623.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001623.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Mountain Home School District 193 (Mountain Home), Mountain Home, Idaho, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on December 29, 1999. The Commission received Mountain Home's Letter of Appeal on February 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. that the Letter
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001624.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001624.txt
        • July 24, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by the Northboro Public Schools (Northboro), Northboro, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 31, 1999. The Commission received Northboro's Letter of Appeal on February 14, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001718.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001718.txt
        • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Carmichaels Area School District (Carmichaels), Carmichaels, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Carmichaels' Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001719.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001719.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Caroline County School District (Caroline County), Bowling Green, Virginia, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 3, 2000. The Commission received Caroline County's Letter of Appeal on May 24, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001720.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001720.txt
        • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Carteret Public Schools (Carteret), Carteret, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 3, 2000. The Commission received Carteret's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001721.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001721.txt
        • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by the City of Boston, Department of Neighborhood Development (City of Boston), Boston, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 31, 2000. The Commission received the City's Letter of Appeal on May 18, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001722.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001722.txt
        • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Columbia Borough School District (Columbia Borough), Columbia, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 5, 2000. The Commission received Columbia Borough's Letter of Appeal on June 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001723.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001723.txt
        • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Homer-Center School District (Homer-Center), Homer City, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Homer-Center's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001724.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001724.txt
        • Released: August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lakeville School District (Lakeville), Lakeville, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Lakeville's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001725.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001725.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Learning Community Charter School (Learning Community), Jersey City, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 24, 2000. The Commission received Learning Community's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001726.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001726.txt
        • SLD had made an error in the amount funded. On December 9, 1999 and March 25, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ringwood's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ringwood subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001727.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001727.txt
        • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Roxbury Library Association (Roxbury), Roxbury, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Roxbury's Letter of Appeal on May 16, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001728.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001728.txt
        • August 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier BureauDeputy Chief,: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Savanna Elementary School (Savanna), Savanna, Oklahoma, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 21, 2000. The Commission received Savanna's Letter of Appeal on May 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001729.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001729.txt
        • 2, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Seattle Hebrew Academy (Seattle Hebrew), Seattle, Washington, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 3, 2000. The Commission received Seattle Hebrew's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001730.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001730.txt
        • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Anthony of Padua Catholic School (St. Anthony), Greenville, South Carolina, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 16, 2000. The Commission received St. Anthony's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001731.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001731.txt
        • L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Don Gallemore, Vernon Parish School Board, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 25, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). See Letter of Appeal of Don Gallemore, Vernon Parish School Board, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed May 25, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but if the applicant files an appeal with the Administrator, the time period for filing with the Commission is tolled pending a decision by the Administrator). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review of
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001733.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001733.txt
        • to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 2, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Shari Peters Kitchen, Orchard View Schools, dated April 14, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Shari Peters-Kitchen, Orchard View Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 2, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001734.txt
        • 2000, Patton filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 227504. On March 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Patton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Patton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001822.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001822.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Children's Home of Burlington County (Children's Home), Newtown, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 10, 2000. The Commission received Children's Home's Letter of Appeal on May 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001823.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001823.txt
        • Released: August 11, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Kerman Unified School District (Kerman), Kerman, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 3, 2000. The Commission received Kerman's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001856.doc
        • and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 2, 2000 by Hayward Unified School District, Hayward, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from James Ogami, Hayward Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed May 1, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001858.doc
        • from David Coggshall, Lake County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, Application 200203 (filed May 4, 2000); Letter of Appeal from David Coggshall, Lake County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, Application 200204 (filed May 4, 2000); Letter of Appeal from David Coggshall, Lake County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, Application 200224 (filed May 4, 2000)(Letters of Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001889.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001889.txt
        • to deny FRNs 361280, 369881, 373742. On May 23, 2000 and May 24, 2000, SLD issued three Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Haven's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. New Haven subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001891.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001891.txt
        • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 294863 and 294865. On January 6, 2000 and March 25, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Whiting's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Whiting subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001892.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001892.txt
        • of SLD's decision to deny funding. On December 9, 1999 and March 25, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Whitehall City's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Whitehall City subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001910.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001910.txt
        • 24, 2000, Rockdale Independent filed with the Commission the instant Letter of Appeal, which seeks review of all five funding commitment decisions. On June 16, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decisions on Appeal approving in full Rockdale Independent's appeal regarding the one funding commitment decision that it did not address in its March 25 Administrator's Decisions on Appeal. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001918.doc
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Community Consolidated School District (Community Consolidated), Carol Stream, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 24, 2000. The Commission received Community Consolidated's Letter of Appeal on May 24, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001919.doc
        • Released: August 23, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Milton Public Library (Milton), Milton, Vermont, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 5, 2000. The Commission received Milton's Letter of Appeal on June 7, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001923.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001923.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Bethlehem Central School District (Bethlehem Central), Delmar, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 8, 2000. The Commission received Bethlehem Central's Letter of Appeal on June 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001924.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001924.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Bishop Hannan High School (Bishop Hannan), Scranton, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 24, 2000. The Commission received Bishop Hannan 's Letter of Appeal on June 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001925.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001925.txt
        • Company (USAC or Administrator) on October 26, 1999. Because Catoosa failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Catoosa's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on October 26, 1999. Catoosa filed appeals of the funding decision with
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001926.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001926.txt
        • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 398940. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider De Valls Bluff's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. De Valls Bluff subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001927.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001927.txt
        • 2000, Duluth filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 336879. On May 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Duluth's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Duluth subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001928.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001928.txt
        • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Egg Harbor City Public Schools (Egg Harbor City), Egg Harbor City, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 5, 2000. The Commission received Egg Harbor City's Letter of Appeal on June 9, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001929.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001929.txt
        • of SLD's decision to deny funding. On December 9, 1999 and March 21, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Fairfield Township's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Fairfield Township subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001930.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001930.txt
        • Cordova filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Folsom Cordova's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Folsom Cordova subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001931.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001931.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Franklin Lakes Public Schools (Franklin Lakes), Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2000. The Commission received Franklin Lakes's Letter of Appeal on June 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001932.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001932.txt
        • 24, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Granville Village School (Granville Village), Granville, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 25, 2000. The Commission received Granville Village's Letter of Appeal on May 30, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001933.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001933.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Oskaloosa School for Christian Instruction (Oskaloosa School), Oskaloosa, Iowa, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 9, 2000. The Commission received Oskaloosa School's Letter of Appeal on June 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001934.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001934.txt
        • 17, 1999. Because Our Lady of Grace failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Our Lady of Grace's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on August 17, 1999. Our Lady of Grace filed appeals of the
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001935.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001935.txt
        • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Paradise Unified School District (Paradise Unified), Paradise, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 22, 2000. The Commission received Paradise Unified's Letter of Appeal on June 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001936.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001936.txt
        • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 224232. On September 22, 1999 and March 25, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Racine's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Racine subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001937.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001937.txt
        • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 408296 and 408450. On May 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Rockwell-Swaledale Community's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Rockwell-Swaledale subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001938.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001938.txt
        • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Sault Ste. Marie Area Public Schools (Sault Ste. Marie), Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 3, 2000. The Commission received Sault Ste. Marie's Letter of Appeal on June 6, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001939.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001939.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 329985 and 403849. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Smithtown's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dearborn subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001940.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001940.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 411623. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Solon Springs' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Solon Springs subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001941.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001941.txt
        • that resulted in an incorrect service start date. On September 22, 1999 and March 24, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Springfield's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Springfield subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001942.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001942.txt
        • an appeal indicating that it wanted an increase in funding. On May 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Warren County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Warren County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002010.doc
        • 2000, Gulfport filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 328543. On May 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gulfport's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gulfport subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002043.doc
        • or Administrator) on September 21, 1999. Because Ann Arbor failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Ann Arbor's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on September 21, 1999. Ann Arbor filed an appeal of the funding
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002044.txt
        • with SLD on September 29, 1999, and filed a subsequent appeal on March 1, 2000. On March 10, 2000, SLD dismissed Dolton's request for review, stating that it could not consider Dolton's appeal because it was filed more than 30 days after the relevant decision was issued. Dolton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002073.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002073.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 419801. On June 8, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Corpus Christi's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Corpus Christi subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002074.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002074.txt
        • or Administrator) on August 3, 1999. Because Educational Service failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Educational Service's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on August 3, 1999. Educational Service filed appeals of the funding decision
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002076.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002076.txt
        • County filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Newton County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Newton County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002097.doc
        • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Penns Grove Carneys Point Regional School District (Penns Grove), Penns Grove, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2000. The Commission received Penns Grove's Letter of Appeal on May 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002098.doc
        • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Don S. Gallemore, Vernon Parish School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 12, 2000. See Letter from Don S. Gallemore, Vernon Parish School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 25, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002181.doc
        • decision stating that it made a typographical error on its Form 471.'' On July 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Carbondale's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Carbondale subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002182.doc
        • County filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On May 30, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Coffee County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Coffee County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002183.doc
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Spartanburg County School District 6 (Spartanburg County), Spartanburg, South Carolina, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 3, 2000. The Commission received Spartanburg County's Letter of Appeal on July 3, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002188.doc
        • September 26, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Utica Community Schools (Utica), Sterling Heights, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 15, 2000. The Commission received Utica's Letter of Appeal on June 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002264.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002264.txt
        • change its mode of network delivery from wireless to wireline. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Carl Schurz's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Carl Schurz subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002265.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002265.txt
        • 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Central Agency for Jewish Education (CAJE), Miami, Florida, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received CAJE's Letter of Appeal on May 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002266.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002266.txt
        • October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Clifton Independent School District (Clifton), Clifton, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 31, 2000. The Commission received Clifton's Letter of Appeal on May 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002267.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002267.txt
        • 2000, Colonial filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 400998. On May 22, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colonial's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colonial subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002268.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002268.txt
        • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 374012 and 384961. On June 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Eastern Plains' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Eastern Plains subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002269.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002269.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 420899. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Garden Grove's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Garden Grove subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002270.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002270.txt
        • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Judge Memorial Catholic High School (Judge Memorial County), Salt Lake City, Utah, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 13, 2000. The Commission received Judge Memorial County's Letter of Appeal on April 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002271.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002271.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 458464. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Kanawha County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Kanawha County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002272.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002272.txt
        • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Marion School District 54 (Marion County), Marion, Montana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Marion County's Letter of Appeal on September 18, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002273.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002273.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its requests for discounts. On July 13, 2000, SLD issued four Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Newburgh's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Newburgh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002274.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002274.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 305643. On June 8, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Castle's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. New Castle subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002275.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002275.txt
        • SLD's decisions, stating that it did not receive the full amount requested. On April 19, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Oscoda's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Oscoda subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002276.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002276.txt
        • October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Pace School (Pace County), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 1, 2000. The Commission received Pace County's Letter of Appeal on June 2, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002277.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002277.txt
        • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Tim O'Leary, Pinckneyville District #50, dated July 20, 1999 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Sue Andrews, Pinckneyville District #50, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 20, 1999 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Pinckneyville's Letter of Appeal seeks review of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued on July 20, 1999. Prior to filing this appeal with the Commission, however, Pinckneyville filed an appeal with SLD. See Letter from Tim O'Leary, Pinckneyville District #50, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed August 16, 1999. SLD issued an
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002278.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002278.txt
        • 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal of the Racine Unified School District (Racine) of Racine, Wisconsin, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 24, 2000. The Commission received Racine's Letter of Appeal on June 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002279.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002279.txt
        • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 399446 and 399610. On June 22, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Saint Andrew's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Saint Andrew subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002280.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002280.txt
        • requests for discounts that had not been considered by SLD. On May 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider San Juan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. San Juan subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002281.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002281.txt
        • Plains filed appeals of SLD's decisions denying SLD-192955 and SLD-194558. On May 23, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Scotch Plains' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Scotch Plains subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002496.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002496.txt
        • PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library, to Federal Communications Commission (filed August 8, 2000). See Letter from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated August 1, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002497.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002497.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 431274 and 431275. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ballinger's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ballinger subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002498.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002498.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 359338. On July 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Big Rapids' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Big Rapids subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002499.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002499.txt
        • Caledonia North filed appeals of SLD's decisions to deny funding. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued four Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Caledonia North's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Caledonia North subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002500.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002500.txt
        • 22, 1999, Douglas filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 22, 1999, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Douglas' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Douglas subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002501.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002501.txt
        • 26, 1999 (SLD-146388); Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, dated November 2, 1999 (SLD-147484) (Funding Commitment Decision Letters). Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr. and L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 19, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Egg Harbor's Letter of Appeal seeks review of the Funding Commitment Decision Letters issued on August 10, 1999, October 26, 1999, and November 2, 1999. Prior to filing this appeal with the Commission, however, Egg Harbor filed appeals with SLD. See Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr. and L. David Rhine, Egg Harbor City Public Schools, to
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002502.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002502.txt
        • 2000, Elgin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 453138. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Elgin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Elgin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002503.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002503.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 414873. On July 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Holy Family's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Holy Family subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002504.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002504.txt
        • 2000, Jefferson filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 365086. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002505.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002505.txt
        • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 275030, 275032, 275038, 275041, and 275044. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002506.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002506.txt
        • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 384448, 384485, and 384520. On July 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Granite's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Granite subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002507.txt
        • Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lexington Public Schools (Lexington), Lexington, Nebraska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 6, 2000. The Commission received Lexington's Letter of Appeal on August 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002508.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002508.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 386438. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Mt. Diablo's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Mt. Diablo subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002509.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002509.txt
        • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Oregon Trail School District (Oregon Trail), Sandy, Oregon, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Oregon Trail's Letter of Appeal on August 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002510.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002510.txt
        • 2000, Southeastern filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 381559. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Southeastern's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Southeastern subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002511.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002511.txt
        • 2000, Southwick-Tolland filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 390427. On July 27, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Southwick-Tolland's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Southwick-Tolland subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002512.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 408616. On July 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Anthony's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Anthony subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002513.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002513.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 476279. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Rita's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Rita subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002514.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002514.txt
        • 2000 Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Yeshiva Schools (Yeshiva), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 2000. The Commission received Yeshiva's Letter of Appeal on August 30, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002531.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002531.txt
        • 2000, Austin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 400580. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Austin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Austin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002532.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002532.txt
        • 2000, Bloomfield filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 431262. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bloomfield's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bloomfield subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002533.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002533.txt
        • 2000, Cumberland filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 348856. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Cumberland's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Cumberland subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002534.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002534.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Eastern Plains Instructional Television Consortium (Eastern Plains), Logan, New Mexico, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 9, 2000. The Commission received Eastern Plains' Letter of Appeal on April 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002535.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002535.txt
        • discounts to services that were not requested in its application. On July 6, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Florence Carlton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters were issued. Florence Carlton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002536.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002536.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny its request for funding. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Florence's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Florence subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002537.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002537.txt
        • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School District 156, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 8, 2000. See Letter from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School District 156, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed May 4, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002538.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002538.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 396144. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Moon Area's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Moon Area subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002539.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002539.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 434670. On June 14, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider North Attleborough's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. North Attleborough subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002540.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002540.txt
        • 2000, Gildford filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 312153. On June 2, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gildford's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gildford subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002541.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002541.txt
        • 31, 2000, Roosevelt Elementary filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Roosevelt Elementary's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Roosevelt Elementary subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002542.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002542.txt
        • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kay Berry, Simpson County School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed June 23, 2000). See Letter from Jack M. McAlpin, Simpson County School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 2, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002543.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002543.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 421231. On June 19, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider South Heart's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. South Heart subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002544.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002544.txt
        • stating that it should have received additional funding. On July 12, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Peter & Paul's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Peter & Paul subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002545.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002545.txt
        • Patrick's filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Patrick's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Patrick subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002546.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002546.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 321400. On July 6, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Swift River's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Swift River subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002547.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002547.txt
        • 2000, Vacaville filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 395593. On July 7, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Vacaville's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Vacaville subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002548.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002548.txt
        • 2000, AECSD filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 404676. On July 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider AECSD's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. AECSD subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002550.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002550.txt
        • 2000, Colton filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 424483. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Colton's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Colton subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002551.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002551.txt
        • 2000, Durham filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 367094. On June 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Durham's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Durham subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002552.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002552.txt
        • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Elko County School District (Elko County), Elko, Nevada, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Elko County's Letter of Appeal on July 20, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002553.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002553.txt
        • 2000, Girard filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 324273. On July 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Girard's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Girard subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002554.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002554.txt
        • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 435901, 435905, and 458591. On August 18, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider McIntosh's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. McIntosh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002555.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002555.txt
        • 13, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative (Northeast), Hayti, South Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 2, 2000. The Commission received Northeast's Letter of Appeal on July 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002556.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002556.txt
        • 357508 due to SLD's conclusion that the funding request included ineligible services. On July 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Ryan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Ryan subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002557.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002557.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Traverse City Area Public Schools (Traverse City), Traverse City, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Traverse City's Letter of Appeal on July 11, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002558.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002558.txt
        • 2000, Xavier filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 418165. On August 9, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Xavier's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Xavier subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002559.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002559.txt
        • SLD's decision to deny FRNs 198760 and 198761. On August 4, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ESU No. 6's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. ESU No. 6 subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002575.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002575.txt
        • for the period between January 1999 to June 1999. On August 12, 1999 and August 7, 2000, SLD issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Delta/Greely's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Delta/Greely subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002642.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002642.txt
        • 18, 2000, Houston Independent filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On July 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Houston Independent's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Houston Independent subsequently filed the instant Letters of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002650.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002650.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 324467. On September 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bryn Athyn's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bryn Athyn subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002651.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002651.txt
        • 8, 2000, EDmin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On September 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider EDmin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. EDmin subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002652.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002652.txt
        • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by James Ward Elementary School (James Ward), Chicago, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 2, 2000. The Commission received James Ward's Letter of Appeal on September 8, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002653.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002653.txt
        • 7, 2000, Madera filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny funding. On September 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Madera's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Madera subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002654.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002654.txt
        • Released: November 29, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Norwell Public Schools (Norwell), Norwell, Massachusetts, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 10, 2000. The Commission received Norwell's Letter of Appeal on September 11, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002655.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002655.txt
        • to approve its funding at a lower amount than requested. On August 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Richland Colfax's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Richland Colfax subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002656.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002656.txt
        • not receive the amount requested for Funding Request Number 397275. On August 17, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Rosa's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Rosa subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002657.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002657.txt
        • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 366305 and 366344. On August 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Ynez's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Ynez subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002658.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002658.txt
        • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint John Bosco High School (Saint John Bosco), Bellflower, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 2, 2000. The Commission received Saint John Bosco's Letter of Appeal on September 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002659.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002659.txt
        • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by South Brunswick Township School District (South Brunswick Township), Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 23, 2000. The Commission received South Brunswick Township's Letter of Appeal on June 23, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002660.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002660.txt
        • Released: November 29, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Westbrook High School (Westbrook), Westbrook, Connecticut, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 17, 2000. The Commission received Westbrook's Letter of Appeal on October 2, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002699.txt
        • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on July 28, 2000. Because Northwestern failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it also requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Northwestern's appeal and its request for waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued on July 28, 2000. Northwestern filed an appeal of the funding decision
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002700.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002700.txt
        • two appeals of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 429028, 431862, and 431875. On August 29, 2000, SLD issued two Administrator's Decisions on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Western Heights' appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Western Heights subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002785.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002785.txt
        • from the date of public notice of such action. 47 C.F.R. � 1.108. Request for Review by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 00-2555 (rel. November 13, 2000). A request for review of an Administrator's decision must be filed within thirty days of the date of the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). 1 ` a  � � � � � (c) � � � � � � � � � � 0 1 ` � � � � � � � 0 1 � � � � � �
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002808.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002808.txt
        • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 369592, 369658, and 369691. On August 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Soille San Diego's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Soille San Diego subsequently filed the instant appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002818.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002818.txt
        • 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lyman School District No. 42-1 (Lyman), Presho, South Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 20, 2000. The Commission received Lyman's Letter of Appeal on September 6, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010024.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 443629 and 443634. On September 20, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Columbia's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Columbia subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010025.txt
        • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Lake Havasu Unified School District (Lake Havasu), Lake Havasu City, Arizona, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 25, 2000. The Commission received Lake Havasu's Letter of Appeal on October 10, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010026.txt
        • 2000, Lakeview filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 409295. On November 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lakeview's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lakeview subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010027.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010027.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 397276 and 397523. On October 31, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Matawan-Aberdeen's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Matawan-Aberdeen subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010028.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010028.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Mt. Diablo Unified School District (Mt. Diablo), Concord, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 26, 2000. The Commission received Mt. Diablo's Letter of Appeal on November 17, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010029.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by New Brighton Area School District (New Brighton), New Brighton, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on September 11, 2000. The Commission received New Brighton's Letter of Appeal on October 16, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010030.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010030.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to funding. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider New Hampshire School's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. New Hampshire School subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010031.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010031.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Newport Public School District (Newport County), Newport, Rhode Island, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 8, 2000. The Commission received Newport County's Letter of Appeal on October 30, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010032.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010032.txt
        • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 23, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 23, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010033.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010033.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 410362. On September 25, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Santa Ana's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Santa Ana subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010034.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010034.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 485878. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Tuckahoe Union's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Tuckahoe Union subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010145.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010145.txt
        • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 13, 2000. See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed November 6, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010146.txt
        • appeal of the funding decision with SLD on June 15, 2000. SLD dismissed the appeal as untimely. Newburgh subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal. Because Newburgh failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within thirty days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it filed a supplemental request for waiver of the 30-day appeal period on September 19, 2000. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline applies to all requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010148.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010148.txt
        • 23, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Sutton School, CNSU (Sutton County), Lyndonville, Vermont, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 17, 2000. The Commission received Sutton County's Letter of Appeal on November 9, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010175.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010175.txt
        • Decision Letter approving East Side Union's request for funding for internal connections. East Side Union filed appeals of the funding decision with SLD on December 8, 1999 and January 5, 2000. SLD dismissed the appeals as untimely. East Side Union subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal and request for waiver of the 30-day deadline for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline applies to all requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010200.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010200.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 333195. On November 28, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Atlantic County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Atlantic County subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010201.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010201.txt
        • 2000, Clearview filed an appeal requesting additional funding for Funding Year 3. On November 28, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Clearview's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Clearview subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010202.txt
        • January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Granville Public Schools (Granville), Granville, North Dakota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 18, 2000. The Commission received Granville's Letter of Appeal on December 12, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010203.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010203.txt
        • Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, dated June 9, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 20, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Leon County's Letter of Appeal seeks review of a Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued on June 9, 2000. At the same time Leon County filed this appeal with the Commission, Leon County also filed an appeal with SLD. See Letter from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010204.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010204.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Levittown Union Free School District (Levittown Union), Levittown, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 10, 2000. The Commission received Levittown Union's Letter of Appeal on November 28, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010205.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010205.txt
        • Released: January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Letter of Appeal filed by Pluralistic School (Pluralistic), Santa Monica, California, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 14, 2000. The Commission received Pluralistic's Letter of Appeal on December 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010206.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010206.txt
        • Decision Letter were wrong and the total pre-discount amount should be changed. On November 17, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Solon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Solon subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010207.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010207.txt
        • for the rest of Funding Year One, i.e. through to June 1999. On May 24, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider MetroCon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. MetroCon subsequently filed the instant Letter of Appeal with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010316.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010316.txt
        • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on May 19, 2000. Because Ashby failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Ashby's Request for Review and its request to waive the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on May 19, 2000. Ashby filed an appeal of the funding decision
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010317.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010317.txt
        • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 1, 2001. See Letter from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010318.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010318.txt
        • 9, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Daingerfield-Lone Star Independent School District (Daingerfield), Daingerfield, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 4, 2000. The Commission received Daingerfield's Request for Review on October 13, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010319.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010319.txt
        • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Requests for Review filed by Hawthorn School District 73 (Hawthorn), Vernon Hills, Illinois, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on April 14, 2000. The Commission received Hawthorn's Request for Review on November 17, 2000 and December 4, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because Hawthorn failed to timely appeal the April 14, 2000 decision to either the Commission or SLD, the Requests for Review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010320.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010320.txt
        • February 9, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Peach Public Libraries (Peach), Fort Valley, Georgia, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 19, 1999. The Commission received Peach's Request for Review on May 7, 1999. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010321.doc
        • 2000, Windham filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 390370. On December 15, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Windham's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Windham subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010324.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010324.txt
        • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Half Hollow Hills School District (Half Hollow), Dix Hills, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 8, 2000. The Commission received Half Hollow's Request for Review on December 22, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010355.txt
        • 2000, Dietrich filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 336896. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Dietrich's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Dietrich subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010356.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010356.txt
        • decision did not reflect the funding period that was requested. On May 3, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, indicating that it would not consider Grant County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Grant County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010357.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010357.txt
        • Highway Christian Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 30, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, dated September 29, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Request for Review from Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed October 30, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010358.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010358.txt
        • discount instead of the requested 80 percent discount. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Pius V's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Pius V subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010373.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010373.txt
        • an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 462972, 462973, and 462974. On January 19, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider USD's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. USD subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010463.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010463.txt
        • Commission, filed July 13, 2000 (Request for Review). See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, dated June 30, 2000 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 13, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010464.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010464.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Salem County Vocational Technical Schools (Salem County), Woodstown, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on October 31, 2000. The Commission received Salem County's Request for Review on December 19, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010585.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010585.txt
        • This order addresses Requests for Review filed by the Caddo Parish School Board (Caddo Parish), Shreveport, Louisiana, on November 9, 1999 and November 12, 1999, seeking review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 12, 1999, regarding Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) 216602 and 252147, respectively. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Request for Review regarding FRN 252147 was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010796.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010796.txt
        • appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 275740 and 275741. On May 11, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Little Miami's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Little Miami subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010855.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010855.txt
        • Mass. DOE's argument that it should be excused because it lacked notice regarding the consequences of failing to comply with SLD's document requests is both contrary to the record and unreasonable on its face. Finally, we note that Mass. DOE was not entitled to relief from SLD for the additional reason that its appeal to SLD was untimely. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Here, SLD issued its Funding Commitment Decision Letter on December 15, 1999. Mass. DOE did not file its appeal with
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010891.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010891.txt
        • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 29, 2001. See Letter from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010892.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010892.txt
        • Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rome City School District (Rome City), Rome, Georgia, seeking review of two decisions issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on December 8, 2000 and December 22, 2000. The Commission received Rome City's Request for Review on March 14, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010919.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010919.txt
        • WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Bloxam, Ohio SchoolNet Commission, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 22, 2000. Letter from Barbara Bloxam and H. Samuel Orth III, Ohio SchoolNet Commission, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010920.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010920.txt
        • 2001, Lemoore filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 402771. On February 9, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Lemoore's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Lemoore subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010921.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010921.txt
        • York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from Joseph Fatuzzo, St. Christopher-Ottilie, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 12, 2001. See Letter from Joseph Fatuzzo, St. Christopher-Ottilie, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 12, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011050.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011050.txt
        • April 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Amherst Independent School District (Amherst), Amherst, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 5, 2001. The Commission received Amherst's Request for Review on March 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011051.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011051.txt
        • 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Harlandale Independent School District (Harlandale), San Antonio, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 2, 2001. The Commission received Harlandale's Request for Review on April 3, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011052.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011052.txt
        • of SLD's decision to deny FRNs 405993, 406305, 406330, 406350, and 420208. On March 16, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Jefferson's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Jefferson subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011053.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011053.txt
        • funding. The Letter of Appeal was dated December 22, 2000. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Montgomery County's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Montgomery County subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011054.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011054.txt
        • days from the date of public notice of such action. 47 C.F.R. � 1.108; see Request for Review by St. Christopher-Ottilie, CC Dockets Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-921 (rel. April 13, 2001). A request for review of an Administrator's decision must be filed within thirty days of the date of the issuance of the decision. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1054 % q r q q
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011055.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011055.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 327849. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider District 4's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. School Administrative subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011056.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011056.txt
        • April 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Tyrone Area School District (Tyrone), Tyrone, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 26, 2001. The Commission received Tyrone's Request for Review on March 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011117.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011117.txt
        • service line and therefore, Qwest could not give them discounted internal connections. On March 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Calhan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Calhan subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011165.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011165.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 423676. On March 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider North Babylon's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. North Babylon subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011179.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011179.txt
        • Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Beth Chana Elementary and High School for Girls (Beth Chana), Brooklyn, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 23, 2001. The Commission received Beth Chana's Request for Review on April 24, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011180.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011180.txt
        • Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Ellenville Central School District (Ellenville), Ellenville, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on June 15, 2000 and a waiver of our appeal rules. The Commission received Ellenville's Request for Review on February 12, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Ellenville asserts that it did not receive the June 15, 2000 decision letter and became aware of the decision on January 24, 2001
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011181.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011181.txt
        • 2, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, dated February 23, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letter). Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 26, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011182.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011182.txt
        • District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 20, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, dated March 23, 2001 (Year 2 Application Return Letter). Request for Review from James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 17, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011230.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011230.txt
        • from Jackie Johnson, Esoft, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 27, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Waburn Martin, Esoft, Inc., dated February 23, 2001 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). Request for Review from Jackie Johnson, Esoft, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 20, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011248.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011248.txt
        • School for Children, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 23, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, dated March 23, 2001. Request for Review from Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 23, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011249.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011249.txt
        • to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated May 8, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dean Werstler, Olmstead Falls City Schools, dated August 7, 2000. Letter from William R. Schuck, Olmstead Falls City Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated January 18, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011294.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011294.txt
        • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Ocean Beach School District No. 101 (Ocean Beach), Long Beach, Washington, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 13, 2000. The Commission received Ocean Beach's Request for Review on April 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. Ocean Beach
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011295.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011295.txt
        • entity information. On June 21, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider NJ State Library's appeal requesting a billed entity information change because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. NJ State Library subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011352.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011352.txt
        • 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by First Baptist Academy (First Baptist), Universal City, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 16, 2001. The Commission received First Baptist's Request for Review on May 18, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011361.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011361.txt
        • Released: June 7, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Project Interconnect, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on November 28, 2000. The Commission received Project Interconnect's Request for Review on December 29, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011398.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011398.txt
        • Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 31, 2001. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, dated January 5, 2001 (Commitment Adjustment Letter). See Letter from Letter from Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed January 30, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011399.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011399.txt
        • 23, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider ONC's March 26, 2001 appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the July 5, 2000 Administrator Letter rejecting ONC's application for failure to meet Minimum Processing Standards was issued. ONC subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011404.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 372633. On May 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Bnos Zion's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Bnos Zion subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011507.txt
        • (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) on October 20, 2000. Because Chabad failed to appeal SLD's funding decision within 30 days of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it requests a waiver of the 30-day appeal period. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Chabad's Request for Waiver of the 30-day time limit for filing appeals. Under section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, any appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or the SLD only upon receipt. As noted, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on October 20, 2000. Chabad filed an appeal of the funding decision
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011511.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011511.txt
        • this decision to SLD, and to the Commission on April 2, 2001. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of SLD decisions do not permit applicants to seek reconsideration of the Administrator's decision from the Administrator. The Commission received Northern Berkshire's Request for Review on April 2, 2001 seeking review of a decision issued by SLD on February 23, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Northern Berkshire's Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011512.txt
        • 4." On April 26, 2001, Petoskey filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On May 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Petoskey's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Petoskey subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011559.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011559.txt
        • decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) on July 19, 2000 which rejected St. Mary's FCC Form 471, Services Ordered and Certification Form, because it was submitted after the close of the 30-day filing deadline for Funding Year 2 . The Commission received St. Mary's Request for Review on August 31, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011560.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011560.txt
        • College (West Shore), Scottville, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 15, 2000 to deny West Shore payment of an invoice it submitted for services it provided to Mason County District Library, Ludington, Michigan. The Commission received West Shore's Request for Review on June 20, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011571.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011571.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by New Kensington-Arnold School District (New Kensington-Arnold), New Kensington, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 11, 2001. The Commission received New Kensington-Arnold's Request for Review on June 19, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011572.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011572.txt
        • July 6, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Sampson-Clinton Public Library (Sampson-Clinton), Clinton, North Carolina, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on May 25, 2001. The Commission received Sampson-Clinton's Request for Review on June 27, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011573.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011573.txt
        • and became aware of the decision only after having contacted SLD. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on June 30, 2000. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011625.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011625.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Saint Thomas Aquinas School (Saint Thomas Aquinas), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 15, 2000. The Commission received Saint Thomas Aquinas's Request for Review on April 5, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011697.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011697.txt
        • 30 days after the Minimum Processing Standards Letter was issued. In their Request for Review, Praxis asserts that they did not receive the Minimum Processing Standards Letter until almost a month after the letter was dated. Praxis provides a copy of the postmark of the Minimum Processing Standards Letter, indicating the letter was issued on August 15, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011698.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011698.txt
        • 2001 Released: July 17, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Rice Independent School District (Rice Independent), Rice, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division. The Commission received Rice Independent's Request for Review on June 1, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011699.txt
        • 2001 Released: July 17, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Scott County School District (Scott County), Forest, Mississippi, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division. The Commission received Scott County's Request for Review on May 30, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011701.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011701.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 381559. On January 2, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Yeshivas Boyan's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Yeshivas Boyan subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011718.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011718.txt
        • which challenged SLD's decision to deny FRNs 476986, 476987, 476988, and 476993. On May 30, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Pomona's appeals because they were received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Pomona subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011724.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011724.txt
        • 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c). Copan Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 5501, para. 6. LA Unified Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3496, para. 9. Id. Id. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any party aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. See Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Lac du Flambeau Public School, filed July 28, 2000. See Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Kingsport City Schools, filed July 31, 2000; Requests for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Lee County School District filed, June 8, 2000 and
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011806.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011806.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Bristol Bay Borough School District (Bristol Bay), Naknek, Alaska, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division issued on May 4, 2001. The Commission received Bristol Bay's Request for Review on July 6, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011822.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011822.txt
        • the record indicates that SLD did issue a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 21, 2000 and mailed it to the address provided by Salem on its FCC Form 471. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for relief. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011823.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011823.txt
        • By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by the Washington Parish School District (Washington Parish), Franklinton, Louisiana, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on February 21, 2001. The Commission received Washington Parish's Request for Review on March 26, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011824.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011824.txt
        • Released: August 1, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Zeeland Public Schools (Zeeland), Zeeland, Michigan, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on March 29, 2001. The Commission received Zeeland's Request for Review on May 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011827.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011827.txt
        • 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to David Boison, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, dated March 22, 2001. Id. Letter from R. Brian Johnson, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed April 6, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to David Boison, South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, dated
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011878.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011878.txt
        • 2000, Gallatin filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 383557. On October 23, 2000, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Gallatin's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Gallatin subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011879.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011879.txt
        • of the district's vendors indicating that a decision had been made. A review of the record indicates that SLD did issue an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on July 21, 2000. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011883.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011883.txt
        • See 47 C.F.R. � 1.113 (permitting actions taken on delegated authority to be reconsidered within 30 days of the public notice of the action). Remand Order, paras. 8-9. Id., para. 8; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rick Barber, Mercer County Area Vocational-Technical School, dated May 12, 2000 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720; see, e.g., Request for Review by North Babylon Union Free School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-160553, CC Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-1165 (Act. Pol. Div. rel. May 9, 2001). Letter from Rick Barber, Mercer County Area Vocational-Technical School, to
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011900.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011900.txt
        • processed. On January 8, 2001, Monessen filed three appeals of SLD's decision. On January 12, 2001, SLD issued three Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Monessen's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Monessen subsequently filed the instant Requests for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011943.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011943.txt
        • Bureau Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., dated July 5, 2001. Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed July 31, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011972.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011972.txt
        • 23, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Fairland Public School District I-31 (Fairland), Fairland, Oklahoma, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 13, 2001. The Commission received Fairland's Request for Review on August 15, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011973.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011973.txt
        • Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by New Plymouth School District No. 372 (New Plymouth), New Plymouth, Idaho, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on January 18, 2001. The Commission received New Plymouth's Request for Review on February 20, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011976.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011976.txt
        • Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 6, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, dated July 23, 2001. Request for Review from Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 6, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012038.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012038.txt
        • the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by East Greenbush Central Schools (East Greenbush), East Greenbush, New York, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on July 13, 2001. The Commission received East Greenbush's Request for Review on August 15, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012086.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012086.txt
        • School, Baltimore, Marlyand, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 25, 2000. See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, dated July 24, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012098.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012098.txt
        • Federal Communications Commission, filed August 24, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, dated July 23, 2001. Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 23, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012129.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012129.txt
        • 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review of the Congregation Bnos Yaakov (Bnos Yaakov), Lakewood, New Jersey, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on April 18, 2000. The Commission received Bnos Yaakov's Request for Review on September 1, 2000. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. A review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012130.txt
        • 2001, DeKalb filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 698159. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider DeKalb's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. DeKalb subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012131.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012131.txt
        • 2001, Estelline filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 305555. On August 3, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Estelline's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Estelline subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.txt
        • asks us to ensure that sufficient funds will be available should these appeals be successful by authorizing SLD to apply any Funding Year 1 committed funds that went unused to the funding of successful Funding Year 1 appeals if necessary. For the reasons discussed below, we deny part of the Request for Waiver, and dismiss the remaining part. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any party seeking review of a decision issued by the Administrator must file its request with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. E-Rate Central is an educational services company that
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012226.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012226.txt
        • Released: September 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by City of Cameron (Cameron), Cameron, Texas, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Cameron's Request for Review on September 11, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012227.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012227.txt
        • 2001, Sealy filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 613865. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Sealy's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Sealy subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012228.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012228.txt
        • 26, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Shelby City Schools (Shelby City), Shelby, Ohio, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 7, 2001. The Commission received Shelby City's Request for Review on September 7, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012229.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012229.txt
        • filed an appeal of SLD's decision to deny FRN 509467. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider St. Cecelia's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. St. Cecelia subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012275.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012275.txt
        • 24, 2001, Sacred Heart filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On August 27, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Sacred Heart's appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Sacred Heart subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012329.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012329.txt
        • decision to treat Mississippi DOE's September 13, 1999 appeal as untimely filed. On March 20, 2000, SLD issued another letter stating that Mississippi DOE's October 18, 1999 appeal was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letters and thus would not be considered. Mississippi DOE subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012362.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012362.txt
        • 2000 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2000. See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed February 28, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719 - 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012398.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012398.txt
        • 28, 2001, Belt Schools filed an appeal of SLD's decision. On September 7, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that it would not consider Belt Schools' appeal because it was received more than 30 days after the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued. Belt Schools subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, an appeal must be filed with the Commission or SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. The 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720 of the Commission's rules applies to all requests for
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012400.txt
        • Released: October 16, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: This Order dismisses the Request for Review filed by Hazelwood School District (Hazelwood), Florissant, Missouri, seeking review of a decision issued by the Universal Service Administrative Company's Schools and Libraries Division on August 27, 2001. The Commission received Hazelwood's Request for Review on September 28, 2001. Under section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110511.html
        • Kenneth.Lewis@fcc.gov. News Media Contact: Janice Wise at (202) 418-8165 [58]DA-11-854A1.doc [59]DA-11-854A1.pdf [60]DA-11-854A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SPEECHES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PREPARED REMARKS OF CHAIRMAN JULIUS GENACHOWSKI, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, PERSONAL LOCALIZED ALERTING NETWORK LAUNCH EVENT, NEW YORK, NY. OCHJG [61]DOC-306425A1.doc [62]DOC-306425A1.pdf [63]DOC-306425A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SACRED HEART SCHOOL, SHAWANO, WISCONSIN, SCHOOL AND LIBRARIES UNIVERSAL SERVICE SUPPORT MECHANISM. Waived sections 54.507(c) and 54.720(c) of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 02-6 ). Action by: Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 05/10/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-820). WCB [64]DA-11-820A1.doc [65]DA-11-820A1.pdf [66]DA-11-820A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306444A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306444A1.txt 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306445A1.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306445A1.txt 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306414A1.pdf 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306414A2.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306413A1.pdf 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306413A2.txt 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306416A1.pdf 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306416A1.txt 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306422A1.pdf 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306422A1.txt 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306423A1.pdf 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306423A1.txt 15.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1270A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1270A1.pdf
        • Association, Inc., Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 15 FCC Rcd 22975 (2001) (Commitment Adjustment Implementation Order) (the Commission established procedures for implementing commitment adjustment recovery actions). See Mastermind Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 4032-4033, para. 10 (concluding that a competitive bidding violation occurred despite the lack of a specific rule addressing the facts at issue). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F. 2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 07-1270 07-1270 p q � � h
        • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1811A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1811A1.pdf
          • (1964), aff'd sub. nom. Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967 (1966). Petition at 1. Id. Id. AM Auction Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 10566; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3568(a)(1) and Green Valley Broadcasters, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 13341, 13345-46 (2004) See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall