FCC Web Documents citing 54.721

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.txt
  • from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to East Rockaway School District, dated June 22, 1999 (Administrator's Decision on East Rockaway Appeal); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Port Washington UFSD, dated July 6, 1999 (Administrator's Decision on Port Washington Appeal). Request for Review at 2. Id. at 2-3. Id. 54 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 01-2137 01-2137 5 6 � � � � � � � � R
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.txt
  • 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15157, n.2 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. August 18, 2000); Juan Galiano, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6442, 6443 (1990) (``[I]f the Commission were to entertain and accept unsupported arguments that letters mailed in Commission proceedings were not delivered... procedural havoc and abuse would result.''). Petition for Reconsideration, at 2-3. Id. 54 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). Petition for Reconsideration, at 3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast). Id. See generally Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket 02-6, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-8 (rel. January 25, 2002). -1109 � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.txt
  • that it is overly speculative to suppose that any particular applicant has, in fact, been prejudiced by delay without a specific record developed by an applicant making such a claim. In addition, we find that the claims on behalf of unspecified injured parties does not comply with the Commission's regulatory requirements for Requests for Review in two respects. First, section 54.721(b) requires a full statement of the relevant material facts. At a minimum, the relevant facts must specify the identity of each party for whom relief is sought, and thus, an appeal on behalf of unspecified parties is inadequate. Second, actions by the Administrator may be challenged only by the parties that are ``aggrieved by [the] action.'' Virginia DOE has made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.txt
  • 471, Jennings City Library, filed January 18, 2001 (Jennings Form 471) (electronic copy). Request for Review. Jennings Form 471 (postmarked envelope). Request for Review. Id. The Commission's rules state that an applicant seeking review of a decision made by the Administrator shall submit to the Commission a statement of relevant material facts with supporting affidavits and documentation. 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). Jennings does not offer any documents to support its assertions. By way of explanation, we note that the SLD online filing system automatically places the date of electronic submission of the FCC Form 471 in a data field titled ``Appl. Postmark Date.'' However, for electronic filings that field only lists the date when the electronic portion of the application was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.txt
  • No. E009261); FCC Form 471, Application Control No. E009262, Enoch Pratt Free Library, filed May 29, 1998 (Control No. E009262); FCC Form 471, Application Control No. E009263, Enoch Pratt Free Library, filed May 29, 1998 (Control No. E009263). These applications were not data-entered, and therefore have no corresponding SLD File Number. See Control Nos. E009261, E009262, E009263. 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). See Request for Review, Attachments (Problem Resolution Response Forms). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, File No. SLD-13364, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur. 2000), para. 8 (``In light of the thousands
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.txt
  • Policy Division (Division) informed Atlantic Digital that its appeal did not comply with the Commission's rules. See Letter from Cathy Carpino, Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, to Indira Rabindranatham, Controller, Atlantic Digital, Inc. (dated July 29, 2004) (July 29, 2004 Letter). Specifically, Atlantic Digital failed to file an affidavit supporting its appeal. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). In addition, there is no indication that Atlantic Digital served a copy of the request for review upon the Administrator. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Thus, the Division requested that Atlantic Digital file an amended appeal that fully conforms to the Commission's rules by August 12, 2004. See July 29, 2004 Letter at 1.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.txt
  • RelComm, Inc., West Berlin, New Jersey, on August 6, 2004 and February 26, 2005, concerning FCC Form 471 application numbers 370716, 374023, and 404818 ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, and 1.3, that the Request for Waiver of sections 54.721(d) and 54.725 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.721(d) and 54.725, filed by the Atlantic City Board of Education, Atlantic City, New Jersey, on October 18, 2004, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from J. Philip Kirchner, Relcomm, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed Aug. 6, 2004 (regarding FCC Form 471
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • Ruling under Section 253 of the Communications Act 06/30/09 3060-0862 Handling Confidential Information 06/30/08 3060-0863 Satellite Delivery of Network Signals to Unserved Households for Purposes of the Satellite Home Viewer Act (SHVA) 04/30/09 3060-0865 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Universal Licensing System Recordkeeping and Third-Party Disclosure Requirements 07/31/10 3060-0874 FCC 475B, FCC 2000 Series 09/30/10 3060-0876 Sec. 54.703 and Secs. 54.719, 54.720, 54.721, 54.722, 54.723, 54.724 and 54.725 09/30/09 3060-0881 Sec. 95.861 09/30/08 3060-0882 Sec. 95.833 01/31/09 3060-0888 Secs. 76.7, 76.9, 76.61, 76.914, 76.1003, 76.1302, and 76.1513 05/31/08 3060-0894 Secs. 54.313 and 54.316 and Certification Letter Accounting for Receipt of Federal Support and Rate Comparability Review and Certification 09/30/10 3060-0895 FCC 502 05/31/10 3060-0896 Broadcast Auction Form Exhibits 12/31/08 3060-0900 Compatibility of Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • review process, and the treatment of disbursements during the pending review process. Need: In implementing statutory requirements for the Universal Service support mechanism, these rules provide the framework and requirements for the review of decisions issued by the Administrator. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 254. Section Number and Title: 54.719 Parties permitted to seek review of Administrator decisions. 54.720 Filing deadlines. 54.721 General filing requirements. 54.722 Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau or the Commission. 54.723 Standard of review. 54.724 Time periods for Commission approval of Administrator decisions. 54.725 Universal service disbursements during pendency of a request for review and Administrator decision. PART 61-TARIFFS SUBPART E-GENERAL RULES FOR DOMINANT CARRIERS Brief Description: The Part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Theodore Burmeister, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Smith Bagley, Inc. Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrator and Request for a Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket Nos. 08-71 and 05-337 (filed July 6, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.721, 54.722. See also High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 8834 (2008) (Interim Cap Order), aff'd, Rural Cellular Ass'n v. FCC, 588 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 2009); High-Cost Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.txt
  • these requests for review on the merits, at least one request for review is also deficient in that it was filed outside the 60-day window or did not comply with our filing requirements. See BitWise Request for Review (filed electronically 61 days after the USAC decision and failing to comply with the filing requirements set forth in 47 C.F.R. � 54.721). (continued . . .) Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1514 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1514 � � � 0 � 0 � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.txt
  • in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone's Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Sep. 28, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE 10/1/2010 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.txt
  • in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone's Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Oct. 21, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.txt
  • presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - East Ascension Telephone Company LLC and EATELCORP, INC. Appeal of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Nov. 16, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-768 Released: May 5, 2010 COMMENT SOUGHT ON THE REQUEST FOR REVIEW BY PR WIRELESS, INC. OF AN AUDIT DECISION BY THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY WC Docket No. 05-337 Comment Date: June 4, 2010 Reply Comment Date: June 18, 2010 On April 5, 2010, PR Wireless, Inc. (PR Wireless), pursuant to sections 54.721 and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, filed a request for review of an audit finding by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). Specifically, PR Wireless requests that the Commission review USAC's audit finding regarding the manner in which PR Wireless reports prepaid wireless subscribers in the universal service high-cost line counts it files with USAC. PR Wireless also requests reversal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.txt
  • ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Puerto Rico Telephone Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719, 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Jan. 11, 2011); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.txt
  • Second Fiscal Quarter Form 499-Qs for 2009 by Dorial Telecom, LLC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Dec. 15, 2010) (Dorial Request for Review). The Commission has delegated authority to the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) to consider requests for review of decisions by USAC. 47 C.F.R. � 54.722(a). Dorial Request for Review at 5-7, 9. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Request for Review by Advantage Telecommunications Corp. of Action by Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5088, 5089, para. 5 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (``Contributors are on notice that we may deny future appeals for procedural defects.''). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). See Letter from USAC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Fulton Telephone Company Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 2, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). Although Fulton Telephone Company seeks review pursuant to section 54.716 of the Commission's rules - a section that does not exist - we will construe the filing as a request for review pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company, Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company and Consolidated Communications of Texas Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Dec. 2, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.txt
  • ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Puerto Rico Telephone Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719, 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 6, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.txt
  • Competition Bureau Letter from Robert Hipke, Alternative Phone, Inc., to Office of the Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Mar. 17, 2011). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170, Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952, 24972, para. 36 (2002). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Request for Review by Advantage Telecommunications Corp. of Action by Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5088, 5089, para. 5 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (``Contributors are on notice that we may deny future appeals for procedural defects.''). (continued . . .) Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-82A1.txt
  • 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dao V. Pham, CML Communications LLC, to Office of the Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Nov. 1, 2010) (CML Request for Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Request for Review by Advantage Telecommunications Corp. of Action by Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5088, 5089, para. 5 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (``Contributors are on notice that we may deny future appeals for procedural defects.''). See CML Request for Review at 1-2. (continued . . .) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.txt
  • interest that we treat appeals to the Administrator or the Commission as having been filed on the date they are postmarked. We therefore add a new section 54.720(e) to our rules. Docket Number Change We adopt a minor procedural amendment conforming our rules to reflect the change in docket numbers for filing appeals. Specifically, we change the wording of section 54.721, which describes the filing requirements for requests for reviews for the entire Universal Service program, to replace the last line of paragraph (a) as follows: instead of stating ``and shall reference FCC Docket Nos. 97-21 and 96-45,'' the line shall read ``and shall reference the applicable docket numbers.'' The docket number for schools and libraries appeals is CC Docket No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.txt
  • from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to East Rockaway School District, dated June 22, 1999 (Administrator's Decision on East Rockaway Appeal); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Port Washington UFSD, dated July 6, 1999 (Administrator's Decision on Port Washington Appeal). Request for Review at 2. Id. at 2-3. Id. 54 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 01-2137 01-2137 5 6 � � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/pendproceed.html
  • amend its 2008 and 2009 FCC Forms 499-A.The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request by Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Inc. for review of USAC's management response to the independent auditor's report that evaluated the company's compliance with the requirements of the high-cost universal service program from July 1, 2007 thru June 30, 200 8 .Sections:54.719(c), 54.721 and 54.722 of the Commissions Rules (petition filed Oct. 21, 2010). CC DKT No. 08-71 [151]DA-10-2100 December 1, 2010 December 16, 2010 IP Telcom, Inc. Public Notice: The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on IP Telcoms request that the Commission direct USAC to waive the revision deadline and permit IP Telcom to amend its 2008 and 2009 FCC Forms 499-A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/highcost.html
  • Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovatitive Telephone Public Notice: The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request by Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Inc. for review of USAC's management response to the independent auditor's report that evaluated the company's compliance with the requirements of the high-cost universal service program from July 1, 2007 thru June 30, 200 8 .Sections:54.719(c), 54.721 and 54.722 of the Commissions Rules (petition filed Oct. 21, 2010). Public Notice [211]Word | [212]PDF 11/1/2010 Syringa Wireless, LLC Order: In this order, the Bureau grants a request by Syringa Wireless, LLC (Syringa) for a waiver of the universal service high-cost filing deadline set forth in sections 54.307(c) of the Commissions rules. We conclude that a waiver is warranted
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/welcome.html
  • Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Public Notice: The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request by Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Inc. for review of USAC's management response to the independent auditor's report that evaluated the company's compliance with the requirements of the high-cost universal service program from July 1, 2007 thru June 30, 200 8 .Sections:54.719(c), 54.721 and 54.722 of the Commissions Rules (petition filed Oct. 21, 2010). [867]Word [868]PDF October 2010 10/28/2010 Cornerstones of Care Order: In this order, we address 10 appeals of decisions by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) denying requests for funding under the E-rate program (more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program) on the ground that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.txt
  • from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to East Rockaway School District, dated June 22, 1999 (Administrator's Decision on East Rockaway Appeal); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Port Washington UFSD, dated July 6, 1999 (Administrator's Decision on Port Washington Appeal). Request for Review at 2. Id. at 2-3. Id. 54 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 01-2137 01-2137 5 6 � � � � � � � � R
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.txt
  • 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15157, n.2 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. August 18, 2000); Juan Galiano, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6442, 6443 (1990) (``[I]f the Commission were to entertain and accept unsupported arguments that letters mailed in Commission proceedings were not delivered... procedural havoc and abuse would result.''). Petition for Reconsideration, at 2-3. Id. 54 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). Petition for Reconsideration, at 3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast). Id. See generally Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket 02-6, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-8 (rel. January 25, 2002). -1109 � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.txt
  • that it is overly speculative to suppose that any particular applicant has, in fact, been prejudiced by delay without a specific record developed by an applicant making such a claim. In addition, we find that the claims on behalf of unspecified injured parties does not comply with the Commission's regulatory requirements for Requests for Review in two respects. First, section 54.721(b) requires a full statement of the relevant material facts. At a minimum, the relevant facts must specify the identity of each party for whom relief is sought, and thus, an appeal on behalf of unspecified parties is inadequate. Second, actions by the Administrator may be challenged only by the parties that are ``aggrieved by [the] action.'' Virginia DOE has made
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.txt
  • 471, Jennings City Library, filed January 18, 2001 (Jennings Form 471) (electronic copy). Request for Review. Jennings Form 471 (postmarked envelope). Request for Review. Id. The Commission's rules state that an applicant seeking review of a decision made by the Administrator shall submit to the Commission a statement of relevant material facts with supporting affidavits and documentation. 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). Jennings does not offer any documents to support its assertions. By way of explanation, we note that the SLD online filing system automatically places the date of electronic submission of the FCC Form 471 in a data field titled ``Appl. Postmark Date.'' However, for electronic filings that field only lists the date when the electronic portion of the application was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.txt
  • No. E009261); FCC Form 471, Application Control No. E009262, Enoch Pratt Free Library, filed May 29, 1998 (Control No. E009262); FCC Form 471, Application Control No. E009263, Enoch Pratt Free Library, filed May 29, 1998 (Control No. E009263). These applications were not data-entered, and therefore have no corresponding SLD File Number. See Control Nos. E009261, E009262, E009263. 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). See Request for Review, Attachments (Problem Resolution Response Forms). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, File No. SLD-13364, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur. 2000), para. 8 (``In light of the thousands
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.txt
  • Policy Division (Division) informed Atlantic Digital that its appeal did not comply with the Commission's rules. See Letter from Cathy Carpino, Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, to Indira Rabindranatham, Controller, Atlantic Digital, Inc. (dated July 29, 2004) (July 29, 2004 Letter). Specifically, Atlantic Digital failed to file an affidavit supporting its appeal. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). In addition, there is no indication that Atlantic Digital served a copy of the request for review upon the Administrator. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Thus, the Division requested that Atlantic Digital file an amended appeal that fully conforms to the Commission's rules by August 12, 2004. See July 29, 2004 Letter at 1.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.txt
  • RelComm, Inc., West Berlin, New Jersey, on August 6, 2004 and February 26, 2005, concerning FCC Form 471 application numbers 370716, 374023, and 404818 ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, and 1.3, that the Request for Waiver of sections 54.721(d) and 54.725 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.721(d) and 54.725, filed by the Atlantic City Board of Education, Atlantic City, New Jersey, on October 18, 2004, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from J. Philip Kirchner, Relcomm, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed Aug. 6, 2004 (regarding FCC Form 471
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • Ruling under Section 253 of the Communications Act 06/30/09 3060-0862 Handling Confidential Information 06/30/08 3060-0863 Satellite Delivery of Network Signals to Unserved Households for Purposes of the Satellite Home Viewer Act (SHVA) 04/30/09 3060-0865 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Universal Licensing System Recordkeeping and Third-Party Disclosure Requirements 07/31/10 3060-0874 FCC 475B, FCC 2000 Series 09/30/10 3060-0876 Sec. 54.703 and Secs. 54.719, 54.720, 54.721, 54.722, 54.723, 54.724 and 54.725 09/30/09 3060-0881 Sec. 95.861 09/30/08 3060-0882 Sec. 95.833 01/31/09 3060-0888 Secs. 76.7, 76.9, 76.61, 76.914, 76.1003, 76.1302, and 76.1513 05/31/08 3060-0894 Secs. 54.313 and 54.316 and Certification Letter Accounting for Receipt of Federal Support and Rate Comparability Review and Certification 09/30/10 3060-0895 FCC 502 05/31/10 3060-0896 Broadcast Auction Form Exhibits 12/31/08 3060-0900 Compatibility of Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • review process, and the treatment of disbursements during the pending review process. Need: In implementing statutory requirements for the Universal Service support mechanism, these rules provide the framework and requirements for the review of decisions issued by the Administrator. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 254. Section Number and Title: 54.719 Parties permitted to seek review of Administrator decisions. 54.720 Filing deadlines. 54.721 General filing requirements. 54.722 Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau or the Commission. 54.723 Standard of review. 54.724 Time periods for Commission approval of Administrator decisions. 54.725 Universal service disbursements during pendency of a request for review and Administrator decision. PART 61-TARIFFS SUBPART E-GENERAL RULES FOR DOMINANT CARRIERS Brief Description: The Part 61 rules are designed to implement the provisions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Theodore Burmeister, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Smith Bagley, Inc. Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrator and Request for a Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket Nos. 08-71 and 05-337 (filed July 6, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.721, 54.722. See also High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 8834 (2008) (Interim Cap Order), aff'd, Rural Cellular Ass'n v. FCC, 588 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 2009); High-Cost Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.txt
  • these requests for review on the merits, at least one request for review is also deficient in that it was filed outside the 60-day window or did not comply with our filing requirements. See BitWise Request for Review (filed electronically 61 days after the USAC decision and failing to comply with the filing requirements set forth in 47 C.F.R. � 54.721). (continued . . .) Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1514 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1514 � � � 0 � 0 � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.txt
  • in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone's Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Sep. 28, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE 10/1/2010 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.txt
  • in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone's Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Oct. 21, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.txt
  • presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - East Ascension Telephone Company LLC and EATELCORP, INC. Appeal of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Nov. 16, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-768 Released: May 5, 2010 COMMENT SOUGHT ON THE REQUEST FOR REVIEW BY PR WIRELESS, INC. OF AN AUDIT DECISION BY THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY WC Docket No. 05-337 Comment Date: June 4, 2010 Reply Comment Date: June 18, 2010 On April 5, 2010, PR Wireless, Inc. (PR Wireless), pursuant to sections 54.721 and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, filed a request for review of an audit finding by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). Specifically, PR Wireless requests that the Commission review USAC's audit finding regarding the manner in which PR Wireless reports prepaid wireless subscribers in the universal service high-cost line counts it files with USAC. PR Wireless also requests reversal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.txt
  • ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Puerto Rico Telephone Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719, 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Jan. 11, 2011); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.txt
  • Second Fiscal Quarter Form 499-Qs for 2009 by Dorial Telecom, LLC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Dec. 15, 2010) (Dorial Request for Review). The Commission has delegated authority to the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) to consider requests for review of decisions by USAC. 47 C.F.R. � 54.722(a). Dorial Request for Review at 5-7, 9. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Request for Review by Advantage Telecommunications Corp. of Action by Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5088, 5089, para. 5 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (``Contributors are on notice that we may deny future appeals for procedural defects.''). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(a). See Letter from USAC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Fulton Telephone Company Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 2, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). Although Fulton Telephone Company seeks review pursuant to section 54.716 of the Commission's rules - a section that does not exist - we will construe the filing as a request for review pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company, Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company and Consolidated Communications of Texas Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Dec. 2, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.txt
  • ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Puerto Rico Telephone Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719, 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 6, 2010); 47 C.F.R. �� 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the Administrator), 54.721 (General filing requirements for review of an Administrator decision), and 54.722 (Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau for request of review of a decision by the Administrator). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.txt
  • Competition Bureau Letter from Robert Hipke, Alternative Phone, Inc., to Office of the Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Mar. 17, 2011). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170, Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952, 24972, para. 36 (2002). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Request for Review by Advantage Telecommunications Corp. of Action by Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5088, 5089, para. 5 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (``Contributors are on notice that we may deny future appeals for procedural defects.''). (continued . . .) Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-82A1.txt
  • 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dao V. Pham, CML Communications LLC, to Office of the Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Nov. 1, 2010) (CML Request for Review). 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Request for Review by Advantage Telecommunications Corp. of Action by Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5088, 5089, para. 5 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (``Contributors are on notice that we may deny future appeals for procedural defects.''). See CML Request for Review at 1-2. (continued . . .) Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.txt
  • interest that we treat appeals to the Administrator or the Commission as having been filed on the date they are postmarked. We therefore add a new section 54.720(e) to our rules. Docket Number Change We adopt a minor procedural amendment conforming our rules to reflect the change in docket numbers for filing appeals. Specifically, we change the wording of section 54.721, which describes the filing requirements for requests for reviews for the entire Universal Service program, to replace the last line of paragraph (a) as follows: instead of stating ``and shall reference FCC Docket Nos. 97-21 and 96-45,'' the line shall read ``and shall reference the applicable docket numbers.'' The docket number for schools and libraries appeals is CC Docket No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.txt
  • from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to East Rockaway School District, dated June 22, 1999 (Administrator's Decision on East Rockaway Appeal); Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Port Washington UFSD, dated July 6, 1999 (Administrator's Decision on Port Washington Appeal). Request for Review at 2. Id. at 2-3. Id. 54 C.F.R. � 54.721(b). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 01-2137 01-2137 5 6 � � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/pendproceed.html
  • amend its 2008 and 2009 FCC Forms 499-A.The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request by Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Inc. for review of USAC's management response to the independent auditor's report that evaluated the company's compliance with the requirements of the high-cost universal service program from July 1, 2007 thru June 30, 200 8 .Sections:54.719(c), 54.721 and 54.722 of the Commissions Rules (petition filed Oct. 21, 2010). CC DKT No. 08-71 [162]DA-10-2100 December 1, 2010 December 16, 2010 IP Telcom, Inc. Public Notice: The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on IP Telcoms request that the Commission direct USAC to waive the revision deadline and permit IP Telcom to amend its 2008 and 2009 FCC Forms 499-A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/highcost.html
  • Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovatitive Telephone Public Notice: The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request by Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Inc. for review of USAC's management response to the independent auditor's report that evaluated the company's compliance with the requirements of the high-cost universal service program from July 1, 2007 thru June 30, 200 8 .Sections:54.719(c), 54.721 and 54.722 of the Commissions Rules (petition filed Oct. 21, 2010). Public Notice [227]Word | [228]PDF 11/1/2010 Syringa Wireless, LLC Order: In this order, the Bureau grants a request by Syringa Wireless, LLC (Syringa) for a waiver of the universal service high-cost filing deadline set forth in sections 54.307(c) of the Commissions rules. We conclude that a waiver is warranted
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/welcome.html
  • Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Public Notice: The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request by Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Inc. for review of USAC's management response to the independent auditor's report that evaluated the company's compliance with the requirements of the high-cost universal service program from July 1, 2007 thru June 30, 200 8 .Sections:54.719(c), 54.721 and 54.722 of the Commissions Rules (petition filed Oct. 21, 2010). [930]Word [931]PDF October 2010 10/28/2010 Cornerstones of Care Order: In this order, we address 10 appeals of decisions by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) denying requests for funding under the E-rate program (more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program) on the ground that