FCC Web Documents citing 61.39

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.pdf
  • No. 98-170 and CG Docket No. 04-208, Second Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd 6448, 6462, para. 28 (2005); Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11701, 11774, para. 136 (1998). 47 U.S.C. � 229(e). 47 C.F.R. � 61.45(d). 47 C.F.R. �� 61.38 and 61.39. RTG Comments at 7; United Utilities Reply Comments at 4. 47 U.S.C. � 1008(b). 47 U.S.C. � 1008(b)(2). First R&O, 20 FCC Rcd at 14990, para. 3. The Commission adopted system security requirements for telecommunications carriers in 1999. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 64.2100-64.2106. The Commission's rules provide guidance to carriers on policies and procedures for employee supervision and control,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf
  • compensation based on the average schedule formulas approved by the Commission, and not on the basis of Farmers' actual costs, actual revenue from end users, or actual rate of return. Effective July 1, 2005, Farmers left the NECA pool and became an issuing carrier for Kiesling Associates LLP Tariff F.C.C. No. 5 (``Kiesling Tariff''), which is governed by Commission rule 61.39(b)(2). The Kiesling Tariff contained separate switched access rates for Farmers. Farmers' interstate switched access service rates were filed on 15 days notice pursuant to section 204(a)(3) of the Act. During the time period relevant to the Complaint, Farmers entered into a number of commercial arrangements with conference calling companies as a means to increase its interstate switched access traffic and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.txt
  • conversion and reduce the incentive to manipulate Commission rules. Waiver recipients must: (1) report to NECA on a combined basis for interstate average schedule and universal service purposes, and receive distributions on that basis as a consolidated company; (2) convert to cost-based settlement status if an average schedule affiliate in that study area converts to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) maintain common control over average schedule affiliates, so that average schedule status terminates when any of the affiliates are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned. See BPS Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 13825. We have always intended for these conditions to ensure that the waivers will not result in unintended effects on the petitioners' interstate revenue requirements or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.txt
  • I. INTRODUCTION 1. We set forth herein the Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) that incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) should file to support the annual revisions to the rates in their interstate access service tariffs scheduled to become effective on July 3, 2001. The completion of the TRPs appended to this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in Sections 61.38, 61.39 and 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's Rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. 2. Based on the Bureau's experience in reviewing the TRPs in prior years, the submission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.txt
  • to be considered officially received on December 17, 2001. ILECs are reminded that there are remote filing sites available at the following addresses: 3. To facilitate the review of the interstate access charge tariffs to be filed to become effective on January 1, 2002, we hereby require all ILECs to submit cost support materials with their tariff filings. Although section 61.39 carriers do not routinely include cost support materials with their filings, we believe that cost support materials will be helpful if filed with the tariff, given the nature of the changes being made with this tariff filing. This tariff filing should be a revenue neutral tariff filing. Therefore, all calculations should be based on the demand data used in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.txt
  • the conversion and reduce the incentive to manipulate Commission rules. Waiver recipients must (1) report to NECA on a combined basis for interstate average schedule and USF purposes, and receive distributions on that basis as a consolidated company; (2) convert to cost-based settlement status if an average schedule affiliate in that study area converts to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) maintain common control over average schedule affiliates, so that average schedule status terminates when any of the affiliates are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned. See BPS, 12 FCC Rcd at 13825. We have always intended for these conditions to ensure that the waivers will not result in unintended effects on the petitioners' interstate revenue requirements or result
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A1.txt
  • to support revisions to the rates in their interstate access service tariffs. The completion of the TRPs will partially fulfill the requirements established in section 61.38 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and would normally not be required to file access service tariff revisions this year absent the requirements adopted in the Rate-of-Return Access Charge Reform Order. Each rate-of-return LEC subject to section 61.39 that files its own common line tariff must file revisions to reflect the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NECA ARC-1 Filing Date: COSTS TO BE MOVED TO COMMON LINE Filing Entity: NECA Period: Tariff Year July 2002 - June 2003 Transmittal Number : COSA: DATA REPORTED BY COMPANY TO NECA NECA USED IN NECA TARIFF SAC COMPANY NAME SET- TLE- MENT TYPE SECTION 61.38 0R 61.39 LINE PORT TRANSPORT (TIC) TIC REVENUES for 12- month period ending 6/30/01 ANNUALIZED LINE PORT TRANSPORT (TIC) TIC REVENUES for 12- month period ending 6/30/01 REASONS FOR DIFFERNCES/NOTES ON CALCULATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.txt
  • 2002 Released: July 1, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: Introduction Price cap local exchange carriers (LECs) and certain LECs subject to rate-of-return regulation are required by sections 69.3(h) and 69.3(f)(1) of the Commission's rules to file revisions to their interstate tariffs to become effective July 1, 2002. In addition, several rate-of-return LECs that are subject to section 61.39 of the rules and that file their own common line tariffs filed tariffs to reflect rule modifications made in the Rate-of-Return Access Charge Reform Order that became effective on July 1, 2002. These LECs filed their tariff transmittals on June 17, 2002, June 25, 2002, or June 28, 2002, as reflected in Appendix A. On June 24, 2002, AT&T Corporation,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.txt
  • accordance with our line port reallocation rules, rate-of-return carriers electing to use the thirty percent proxy in future tariff filings shall reallocate thirty percent of the revenue requirement for the test period underlying their tariff filing to the common line category. Thus, section 61.38 carriers shall apply the thirty percent proxy to their projected local switching revenue requirement, while section 61.39 carriers shall apply the thirty percent proxy to their historical local switching revenue requirement. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 204, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108, we reconsider, on our own
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.txt
  • Order, DA 02-888 at para. 20 (rel. Apr. 18, 2002) (citing Puerto Rico Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 61.41 or Section 54.303(a) of the Commission's Rules, CCB/CPD No. 99-36, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 9680, 9682-83 para. 5 (2000)). See Valor Petition at 5, 7; see also NECA Comments at 2; USTA Comments at 3. See 47 C.F.R. �� 61.39, 69.3(f)(2). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3553 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3553 % & � � F [ � h � `` � ``
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.txt
  • June 2002 with the annual access tariff filing. In a subsequent public notice, the Bureau will provide a format for a TRP to be submitted by all ILECs subject to rate-of-return regulation, including carriers that are required to file annual access tariffs in July, 2002 pursuant to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules, as well as carriers subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules that do not normally file access tariffs in even numbered years. TRPs are designed to display basic information on access charges in a uniform format in the most effective and least burdensome way possible. The Bureau updates the TRPs prior to each required filing of access charges to reflect changes in Commission rules. TRPs are subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.txt
  • 3. ILECs that file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 are required to file in even-numbered years and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Since 2002 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs including support material that includes a TRP. For the 2002 annual access tariff filing, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.txt
  • 3. ILECs that file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 are required to file in even-numbered years and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Since 2003 is an odd numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file revised access tariffs. For the 2003 annual access tariff filing, we are requiring the ILECs that do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1176A1.txt
  • this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. 2. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in even-numbered years and would normally not be required to file access service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.txt
  • Commission has previously imposed, to which the petitioners would assent upon grant of waiver, are as follows: (1) the requesting companies and their affiliates must make a combined report to NECA, including average schedule and USF-related concerns; (2) all affiliates must convert to cost-based settlements if any one affiliate converts from average schedule status to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) the companies' average schedule status may remain in effect only as long as the respective affiliates remain under common control. Id. NECA Comments at 3. NTCA Comments at 3-4. See NebCom, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Sections 61.41(c)(2) and 69.605(c) of the Commission's Rules, AAD File No. 97-50, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4487, 4492 para. 13 (Acc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1048A1.txt
  • ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. 2. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and would normally not be required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings if made this year, absent the requirements adopted in the Rate-of-Return Access Charge Reform Order. 3. The tariff filings of rate-of-return LECs subject to sections 61.38 and 61.39 must implement certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.txt
  • 3. ILECs that file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 are required to file in even-numbered years, and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2004 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs this year, including support material that includes a TRP. 4. Price cap ILECs are required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.txt
  • July 1, 2004 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau: Introduction Price cap local exchange carriers (LECs) and certain LECs subject to rate-of-return regulation are required by sections 69.3(h) and 69.3(f)(1) of the Commission's rules to file revisions to their interstate tariffs to become effective July 1, 2004. In addition, several rate-of-return LECs that are subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules filed their own access tariffs because they chose to exit one or more of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (NECA) administered pools. LECs filed tariffs on June 16, 2004 and June 24, 2004, and subsequent revisions as reflected in Appendix A. AT&T Corp. (AT&T) and General Communication, Inc. (GCI) filed petitions to suspend and investigate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1038A1.txt
  • this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. 2. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year, and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers are reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary for the review of a tariff filing. The completion of the attached TRP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.txt
  • 3. ILECs that file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 are required to file in even-numbered years, and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2005 is an odd-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file revised access tariffs this year. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.38 may elect to make a voluntary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing to ensure high service quality and universal service at reasonable rates. Sections 61.42(e)(1)(iii) and 61.42(e)(1)(iv) establish the price cap baskets for 800 data base access services and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.txt
  • most instances, carriers can or must file line counts and certifications on a quarterly basis. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. Part 54, Subpart J (Interstate Access Universal Service Support Mechanism) and Subpart K (Interstate Common Line Support Mechanism for Rate-of-Return Carriers). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.301. See Alliance Petition, 12-13; EATEL Petition at 6, 9. The Petitioners are subject to section 61.39 and file tariffs in odd numbered years to be effective for two years. They filed in 2005 based on costs for 2003-04. To the extent that any Petitioner included in its 2003-04 costs supporting its 2005 tariff filing any amounts calculated pursuant to section 54.301, the Petitioner must submit revised cost support materials excluding such amounts and adjust its interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian's FCC Tariff No. 2, only with respect to Hawaiian's 2006 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.42(g), 61.43. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hawaiian Telcom Inc.'s request for waiver of sections 61.38 and 61.49 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.39, 61.49, IS DENIED as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Hawaiian Telcom Inc. Petition for a Waiver of Sections 61.42(g), 61.38, and 61.49 of the Commission's Price Cap Rules for Advanced Services Formerly Offered by Verizon Hawaii, WCB/Pricing File No. 06-19 (filed Apr. 11, 2006) (Hawaiian Petition). See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.txt
  • tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file in even-numbered years, and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2006 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs this year. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 may elect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-650A1.txt
  • are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers should file a Tariff Review Plan to support these revisions. The completion of the attached TRP will partially fulfill the requirements established in section 61.38 of the Commission's rules. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 electing to make a voluntary tariff filing at this time is reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.txt
  • tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. In addition, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file in even-numbered years. Those filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2007 is an odd-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file revised access tariffs this year. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.38 may elect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1484A1.pdf
  • to this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year, and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers are reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary for the review of a tariff filing. The completion of the attached TRP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.txt
  • filed their original tariff transmittals on June 15, 2007, or June 22, 2007, and subsequent revisions as reflected in Appendix A. AT&T Corporation (AT&T), Qwest Communications Corporation (Qwest), Sprint Nextel Corporation (Sprint Nextel), and Verizon (the Petitioners) filed petitions to suspend and investigate the tariffs of carriers leaving the NECA traffic-sensitive pool and filing their own tariffs pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. AT&T, General Communication Incorporated (GCI), and Verizon filed petitions to suspend and investigate NECA's Tariff No. 5. On June 26, 2007, NECA and a number of the LECs filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules filed replies to the petitions. In this Order, we suspend for one day and set for investigation the switched
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.txt
  • cases have been filed. Contemporaneously, the LECs that have been accused of this access stimulation have alleged that certain carriers have unreasonably blocked calls from those carriers' end-users to certain phone numbers terminating in the LECs' exchanges. On June 15, 2007, 29 carriers that were participating in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) traffic-sensitive tariffs filed individual tariffs under section 61.39 of the Commission rules. Qwest, Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint Nextel filed objections to these filings, alleging that it is likely that these tariffs will result in unjust and unreasonable rates. The complaining carriers assert the recent conduct of current section 61.39 carriers similarly situated to those that recently made such tariff filings raises serious questions regarding whether such carriers are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.txt
  • filings will remain just and reasonable if demand increases dramatically; (4) whether the Commission should require carriers subject to this investigation to include language in their tariffs to ensure that it has an opportunity to review a carrier's rates when a significant increase in local switching demand occurs; (5) whether the existing cost support requirements contained in sections 61.38 and 61.39 are adequate to permit the Commission to determine that the revised rates filed as a result of a significant increase in access traffic, pursuant to issue four above, are just and reasonable or whether additional data will be necessary; and (6) whether the rates specified in the suspended tariffs have remained, or will remain, just and reasonable during the investigation.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.txt
  • 182.39 Ashville OH0980 26.87% 1243 334.02 Athens (City) OH0029, 16.02% 6271 1004.86 Baltimore OH0847 28.78% 1159 333.51 Belle Center OH1539 30.19% 326 98.41 Berkshire OH1687 33.97% 806 273.81 Berne OH0405 20.67% 1836 379.55 Bremen OH0807 42.46% 483 205.09 Bucyrus (City) OH0054 18.46% 5559 1026.45 Bucyrus (Township) OH0474 18.46% 317 58.53 Cardington OH2170, 43.62% 754 328.93 OH2112 Carroll OH1049 32.48% 189 61.39 Centerburg OH1379 52.22% 504 263.20 Chesterville OH2173 36.50% 57 20.81 Circleville (City) OH0311 22.07% 5378 1187.17 Circleville (Township) OH0446 22.07% 917 202.42 Crestline OH0032 20.81% 2070 430.80 Crooksville OH0090 27.93% 968 270.32 Danville OH0091 42.32% 442 187.08 Darby (Pickaway) OH2424 36.04% 1259 453.78 Darby (Union) OH1240 27.60% 685 189.07 Delaware OH0513, 15.38% 9520 1463.83 OH0291 Dover (Union) OH2288 25.72% 800
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.txt
  • initially failed to move its marketing expenses from the Traffic-sensitive and Trunking Baskets to the Common-line basket, but resolved this issue in a subsequent filing. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). Century's Tariff FCC Nos. 2 & 3 are subject to price cap regulation. Century's Tariff FCC No.1 is subject to rate-of-return regulation. City of Brookings is a 61.39 carrier that is exiting NECA's tariff. Revises some 61.39 carrier rates and removes LaHarpe's access rates. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1562 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1562 � � � - @& $ � � � � �� � � ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.txt
  • file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. In addition, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file in even-numbered years. Those filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2008 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 may elect to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.txt
  • Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers should file a TRP to support these revisions. The completion of the attached TRP will partially fulfill the requirements established in section 61.38 of the Commission's rules. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 electing to make a voluntary tariff filing at this time is reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.txt
  • 2009 7-DAY TARIFF FILINGS: June 24, 2009 PETITIONS: June 26, 2009 REPLIES: June 29, 2009 (due no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) Eastern Time) I. INTRODUCTION This order establishes procedures for the 2009 filing of annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) for incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) subject to price caps and those ILECs subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. This order: (1) sets an effective date of July 1, 2009 for the July 2009 annual tariff filings; (2) establishes the dates for filing petitions to suspend or reject the ILEC tariff filing and replies to such petitions; and (3) addresses service of the petitions and replies. It also sets the date that price cap carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.txt
  • to this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year, and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers are reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary for the review of a tariff filing. The completion of the attached TRP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.txt
  • file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. In addition, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file in even-numbered years. Those filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2010 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs this year. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 may elect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.txt
  • Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers should file a TRP to support these revisions. The completion of the attached TRP will partially fulfill the requirements established in section 61.38 of the Commission's rules. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 electing to make a voluntary tariff filing at this time is reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.txt
  • 28, 2011 (due no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) Eastern Time) REPLIES: June 29, 2011 (due no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) Eastern Time) I. INTRODUCTION This order establishes procedures for the 2011 filing of annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) for incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) subject to price caps and those ILECs subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. This order (1) sets an effective date of July 1, 2011 for the July 2011 annual tariff filings; (2) establishes the dates for filing petitions to suspend or reject an ILEC tariff filing and replies to such petitions; and (3) addresses service of the petitions and replies. It also sets the date that price cap carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.txt
  • to this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year, and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers are reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary for the review of a tariff filing. The completion of the attached TRP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.txt
  • FILINGS: June 26, 2012 PETITIONS: June 28, 2012 REPLIES: June 29, 2012 I. INTRODUCTION This order establishes procedures for the 2012 filing of annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) for incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) subject to price caps, as well as rate-of-return ILECs subject to Section 61.38 of the Commission's rules and those ILECs subject Section 61.39 of the Commission's Rules that elect to file an Access Recovery Charge (ARC) as part of the ICC order recovery mechanism and/or revise their rates. This order (1) sets an effective date of July 3, 2012 for the July 2012 annual access charge tariff filings; (2) establishes the dates for filing petitions to suspend or reject an ILEC tariff filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.txt
  • to partially mitigate the effect of reduced intercarrier revenues on carriers. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers should file a TRP to support these revisions. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules historically would not have been required to file access service tariffs this year, since they file revisions in odd-numbered years. Pursuant to the USF/ICC Transformation Order, however, if a rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules elects to tariff and charge end users an ARC, that ILEC must file a TRP with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • by price indices that have been adjusted annually pursuant to formulae set forth in our Part 61 rules. Price cap carriers whose interstate access charges are set by these pricing rules are 24 Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. 25 The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and GTE, and permitted other LECs to adopt price cap regulation voluntarily, provided that all their affiliates also convert to price cap regulation and that they withdraw from the NECA pools. Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, Second Report and Order, CC Docket No. 87-313, 5 FCC Red
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247885A1.txt
  • VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 18M0F8F- 79.40 dBW FM ANALOG VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0F8F 65.39 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G1F- 71.92 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 9M00G1F 76.18 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F- 77.94 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 61.39 dBW FM ANALOG AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 200KF3F 48.22 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 38K4G7W 49.75 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 54K6G7W- 77.93 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 35M9G7W 60.29 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 618KD7W- 75.45 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 20M3D7W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250829A1.txt
  • VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 18M0F8F- 72.70 dBW FM ANALOG VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0F8F 65.39 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G1F- 71.92 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 9M00G1F 72.70 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F- 72.70 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 61.39 dBW FM ANALOG AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 200KF3F 48.22 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 38K4G7W 49.75 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 54K6G7W- 72.70 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 35M9G7W 60.29 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 618KG7W- 72.70 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 20M3G7W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266601A1.txt
  • dBW One 36Mbit MCPC digital carrier for voice & data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () E060274 SES-LIC-20060719-01202E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority ORLANDO HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 VARIOUS LOCATION: VERTEX 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.5m SF FAW 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) KA313 SES-MOD-20060519-00858E Class of Station: Other Application for Modification Telenor Satellite, Inc. Page 20 of 33 Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service, Other Telenor Satellite, Inc. seeks authority to authorize up to 550 Ku-band terminals for ESV operation. These terminals, all with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267151A1.txt
  • MHz 36M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () Page 5 of 57 E060274 SES-LIC-20060719-01202E Date Effective: 08/29/2006 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 08/29/2006 - 08/29/2021 Application for Authority ORLANDO HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 VARIOUS LOCATION: VERTEX 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.5m SF FAW 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E040305 SES-MOD-20060707-01139E Date Effective: 08/23/2006 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 08/23/2004 - 08/23/2019 Application for Modification American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 VARIOUS LOCATION: ND SATCOM 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267233A1.txt
  • 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F QPSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/ DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060336 SES-LIC-20060824-01504E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority Meredith Corporation - WSMV Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 WSMV, VARIOUS LOCATION: AvL 1 1.2 meters ANTENNA ID: 1200K DSNG 61.39 dBW PSK Digital Video w/ digital audio/data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060309 SES-LIC-20060824-01508E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority West Virginia Media Holdings, LLC Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 904 PIKE STREET CLARKSBURG, WV, 26301, HARRISON, VARIOUS LOCATION: AVL Technology 1 1.2 meters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267839A1.txt
  • 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Page 18 of 35 E060336 SES-LIC-20060824-01504E Date Effective: 10/10/2006 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 10/10/2006 - 10/10/2021 Application for Authority Meredith Corporation - WSMV Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 WSMV, VARIOUS LOCATION: AvL 1 1.2 meters ANTENNA ID: 1200K DSNG 61.39 dBW PSK Digital Video w/ digital audio/data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060309 SES-LIC-20060824-01508E Date Effective: 10/10/2006 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 10/10/2006 - 10/10/2021 Application for Authority West Virginia Media Holdings, LLC Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 904 PIKE STREET CLARKSBURG, WV,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271873A1.txt
  • GE-5 - (79 W.L.) 1 - AMSC-9 - (85 W.L.) 1 - IA-7 - (129 W.L.) 1 - IA-8 - (89 W.L.) E070044 SES-LIC-20070323-00398E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 (TEMP FIXED), VARIOUS LOCATION: VERTEX 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.5M SF FAW 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Page 2 of 14 E000674 SES-MOD-20070302-00291E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Modification RADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service "CORECTION" to the FCC Form 312-Schedule B Technical and Operation Description for the Antenna Gain Transmit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272809A1.txt
  • (325.5 E.L.) Atwater 574 - SATMEX-5 - (116.8 W.L.) E070044 SES-LIC-20070323-00398E Date Effective: 04/30/2007 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 04/30/2007 - 04/30/2022 Application for Authority OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 (TEMP FIXED), VARIOUS LOCATION: VERTEX 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.5M SF FAW Page 6 of 30 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) SES-LIC-INTR2007-00933E Date Effective: 04/24/2007 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Withdrawn Application for Authority NYT MANAGEMENT SERVICES Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: Transportable Various Locations Throughtout the United States LOCATION: Communications A1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: NewsSwift 63.65
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280041A1.pdf
  • 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7F PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7F 52.30 dBW DIGITAL DATA CARRIER 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 512KG7D MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 66.80 dBW PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M50G7D PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 2M50G7D 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F 64.50 dBW MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M87G7W 58.20 dBW MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M87G7W Points of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280763A1.pdf
  • 36M0G7F PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Page 3 of 7 52.30 dBW DIGITAL DATA CARRIER 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 512KG7D MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 66.80 dBW PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M50G7D PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 2M50G7D 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F 64.50 dBW MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M87G7W 58.20 dBW MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M87G7W Points of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295250A1.txt
  • VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 18M0F8F- 72.70 dBW FM ANALOG VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0F8F 65.39 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G1F- 71.92 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 9M00G1F 72.70 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F- 72.70 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 61.39 dBW FM ANALOG AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 200KF3F 48.22 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 38K4G7W 49.75 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 54K6G7W- Page 14 of 39 72.70 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 35M9G7W 60.29 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 618KG7W- 72.70 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.txt
  • of regulation provided in �61.60(d). Path B LEC. A non-price cap LEC that chooses Path B pursuant to �61.60. * * * * * Revenue per line (RPL). A settlement method used in Path A incentive regulation calculated pursuant to �61.62(a)(1)(B). * * * * * * * * * * Subpart E - General Rules for Dominant Carriers Section 61.39(b)(4)(ii) is amended by replacing the phrase ``carrier common line pool'' with the phrase ``pool administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association.'' Section 61.41(c) is amended by adding the following subsection (4): �61.41 * * * * * (c) * * * * * (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of �61.42(c)(1) and (2) above, when a Path A LEC or Path B
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.txt
  • collects this data for the purpose of preparing its annual tariff filings. In accordance with our rules, NECA develops its data collections independently. See id. at �� 69.605, 69.606. Rate-of-return carriers that are not members of the common line pool submit forecasted common line costs directly to the Commission as part of their tariff filings. See id. at �� 61.38, 61.39. We understand that, although projected common line costs are filed by individual carriers with NECA in March or April, carriers do not finalize their reports until early June, in time for NECA to prepare and file its annual interstate access service tariff with the Commission. In order to enable USAC to calculate and begin distributing Interstate Common Line support on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.txt
  • the additional services sold as a result, will provide some substantial recovery for numbering administration costs, including the costs of implementing thousands-block number pooling. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.45(d). For rate-of-return carriers, of course, costs arising from thousands-block number pooling would be treated in the same manner as other costs in each carrier's biennial rate adjustments. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. See NECA Comments at 3; SBC Comments at 25; Verizon Comments at 5. See Ad Hoc Comments at 31-33; Joint Consumer Comments to First Report and Order at 42; General Services Administration Reply Comments to First Report and Order at 16-17. See supra at n.96 and accompanying text (citing First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7625, para. 122).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.txt
  • to AT&T and other interexchange carriers (``IXCs''). Prior to March 31, 1994, Beehive charged IXCs access rates at the levels contained in the interstate access tariff filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (``NECA'') on behalf of its member companies. The NECA tariff specified a rate of approximately $.07 per terminating access minute. On March 31, 1994, pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules, Beehive withdrew from the NECA tariff and filed its own interstate access tariff (``Tariff'') specifying a terminating interstate access rate of $.47 per minute. That Tariff became effective on July 1, 1994. Although it contained its own access rates, Beehive's Tariff explicitly incorporated the non-rate regulations, terms, and conditions for access services set forth in NECA's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-195A1.txt
  • 59 F.3d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (``MCI v. FCC''); Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. v. FCC , 989 F.2d 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (``Virgin Islands''); Represcribing the Authorized Rate of Return for Interstate Services of Local Exchange Carriers, Order, 5 FCC Rcd 7507, 7532 at �� 1, 216 (1990) (``Rate-of-Return Prescription Order'') (subsequent history omitted). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 61.38, 61.39. 47 U.S.C. � 203. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.3(a), 61.58(a)(2)(ii). Annual tariffs for access services generally become effective July 1. 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(f). The maximum allowable rate of return is equal to the prescribed rate of return plus the amount specified in sections 65.700(a) or (b), of our rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 65.700(a),(b), which is a margin that the carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.txt
  • GCI that pooling is inconsistent with pricing flexibility. While pooling involves a degree of averaging and risk sharing that would not exist if carriers filed their own tariffs, this is the case whether pricing flexibility is involved or not. Rate-of-return carriers subject to section 61.38 of our rules must file cost support with their tariffs, and those subject to section 61.39 must be prepared to submit cost support upon request. This supporting material will include a clear delineation of the geographically deaveraged pricing zones. It will also describe the process used to establish rates, whether on an individual carrier basis or through the use of some aggregation approach, such as the banding NECA currently uses for some rate elements, along with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
  • to serve the geographic area in which the interexchange carrier or other person's point of demarcation is located.'' 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(rr). See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14227, para. 10. Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12968, paras. 13, 15. The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and GTE, and permitted other LECs to elect price cap regulation voluntarily, provided that all their affiliates also convert to price cap regulation and that they withdraw from the pools administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA). Policy and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.txt
  • No. 98-170 and CG Docket No. 04-208, Second Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd 6448, 6462, para. 28 (2005); Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11701, 11774, para. 136 (1998). 47 U.S.C. � 229(e). 47 C.F.R. � 61.45(d). 47 C.F.R. �� 61.38 and 61.39. RTG Comments at 7; United Utilities Reply Comments at 4. 47 U.S.C. � 1008(b). 47 U.S.C. � 1008(b)(2). First R&O, 20 FCC Rcd at 14990, para. 3. The Commission adopted system security requirements for telecommunications carriers in 1999. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 64.2100-64.2106. The Commission's rules provide guidance to carriers on policies and procedures for employee supervision and control,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.txt
  • compensation based on the average schedule formulas approved by the Commission, and not on the basis of Farmers' actual costs, actual revenue from end users, or actual rate of return. Effective July 1, 2005, Farmers left the NECA pool and became an issuing carrier for Kiesling Associates LLP Tariff F.C.C. No. 5 (``Kiesling Tariff''), which is governed by Commission rule 61.39(b)(2). The Kiesling Tariff contained separate switched access rates for Farmers. Farmers' interstate switched access service rates were filed on 15 days notice pursuant to section 204(a)(3) of the Act. During the time period relevant to the Complaint, Farmers entered into a number of commercial arrangements with conference calling companies as a means to increase its interstate switched access traffic and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.txt
  • in excess of costs are shared among all pool members. Cost and average schedule carriers may choose to enter or leave the NECA pool on July 1 of any year by providing notice to NECA by the preceding March 1. Alternatively, a rate-of-return carrier may file access tariffs pursuant to the provisions of section 61.38 (section 61.38 carrier) or section 61.39 (section 61.39 carrier). Under section 61.38, a carrier is required to file access tariffs in even numbered years to be effective for a two-year period. A section 61.38 carrier files tariffed rates based on its projected costs and demand and targets its rates to earn an 11.25 percent return. If the demand of a section 61.38 carrier increases above the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-210A1.txt
  • filings will remain just and reasonable if demand increases dramatically; (4) whether the Commission should require carriers subject to this investigation to include language in their tariffs to ensure that it has an opportunity to review a carrier's rates when a significant increase in local switching demand occurs; (5) whether the existing cost support requirements contained in sections 61.38 and 61.39 of the Commission's rules are adequate to permit the Commission to determine that the revised rates filed as a result of a significant increase in access traffic, pursuant to issue four above, are just and reasonable or whether additional data will be necessary; and (6) whether the rates specified in the suspended tariffs have remained, or will remain, just and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • this chapter. (d) International carriers must certify that they are authorized under Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to provide service, and reference the FCC file number of that authorization. (e) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, any incumbent local exchange carrier choosing to file an Access Tariff under �61.39 must include in the transmittal: (1) A summary of the filing's basic rates, terms and conditions; (2) A statement concerning whether any prior Commission facility authorization necessary to the implementation of the tariff has been obtained; and (3) A statement that the filing is made pursuant to �61.39. (f) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.txt
  • interstate access tariffs: (1) participation in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Tariff No. 5, which sets forth interstate access charges for participating LECs; (2) filing a tariff pursuant to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules, which would be based on projected costs and demand; or (3) for carriers with 50,000 or fewer lines, filing a tariff pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules, which would be based on historical costs and demand. Most rate-of-return LECs participate in a traffic-sensitive pool managed by NECA and participate in the traffic-sensitive tariff filed annually by NECA on behalf of participating members. Interstate access rates in the traffic-sensitive tariff are set based on the projected aggregate costs (or average schedule settlements) and demand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • tell if the condition had been met. Remedies If a LEC meets both conditions of the definition, it must file a revised tariff except under certain limited circumstances. As explained in more detail below, a rate-of-return LEC must file its own cost-based tariff under section 61.38 of the Commission's rules and may not file based on historical costs under section 61.39 of the Commission's rules or participate in the NECA traffic-sensitive tariff. If a competitive LEC meets the definition, it must benchmark its tariffed access rates to the rates of the price cap LEC with the lowest interstate switched access rates in the state, rather than to the rates of the BOC or the largest incumbent LEC in the state (as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • this chapter. (d) International carriers must certify that they are authorized under Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to provide service, and reference the FCC file number of that authorization. (e) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, any incumbent local exchange carrier choosing to file an Access Tariff under �61.39 must include in the transmittal: (1) A summary of the filing's basic rates, terms and conditions; (2) A statement concerning whether any prior Commission facility authorization necessary to the implementation of the tariff has been obtained; and (3) A statement that the filing is made pursuant to �61.39. (f) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • 12 month period of operations or are estimated to exceed $500,000 for a representative 12 month period. Local exchange carriers serving 50,000 or fewer access lines in a given study area that are described as subset 3 carriers in � 69.602 of this chapter may submit Access Tariff filings for that study area pursuant to either this section or � 61.39. However, the Commission may require any carrier to submit such information as may be necessary for a review of a tariff filing. This section (other than the preceding sentence of this paragraph) shall not apply to tariff filings proposing rates for services identified in � 61.42(d), (e), and (g). 24. Revise Section 61.38(b) to remove and reserve Section 61.38(b)(3). 25.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 16010-11 (1997) (Access Charge Reform Order), aff'd sub. nom., Southwestern Bell v. FCC, 153 F.3d 523 (8th Cir. 1998). Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and GTE, and permitted other LECs to elect price cap regulation voluntarily, provided that all their affiliates also convert to price cap regulation and that they withdraw from the pools administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA). Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.wp
  • rates; and (2) the mechanics of how PRTC's rates would be affected by its withdrawal from the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Carrier Common Line pool. See, e.g., TLD Petition at 9-14; ABETG/Vizcarondo Petition at 19-22; MCI WorldCom Comments at 4. 62 See, e.g., LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6816, � 241. 11 22. Pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules, PRTC has elected to provide interstate access service under rate of return regulation. Because GTE is subject to price cap regulation, however, PRTC will be required within 12 months of our approval of this transfer of control to file interstate access tariffs for Puerto Rico using the price cap methodology.58 Competing local and interexchange carriers claim
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-186A1.html
  • AT&T and other interexchange carriers (``IXCs'').15 5. Prior to March 31, 1994, Beehive charged IXCs access rates at the levels contained in the interstate access tariff filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (``NECA'') on behalf of its member companies.16 The NECA tariff specified a rate of approximately $.07 per terminating access minute.17 On March 31, 1994, pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules,18 Beehive withdrew from the NECA tariff and filed its own interstate access tariff (``Tariff'') specifying a terminating interstate access rate of $.47 per minute.19 That Tariff became effective on July 1, 1994.20 Although it contained its own access rates, Beehive's Tariff explicitly incorporated the non-rate regulations, terms, and conditions for access services set forth in NECA's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-195A1.html
  • FCC, 59 F.3d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (``MCI v. FCC''); Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. v. FCC , 989 F.2d 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (``Virgin Islands''); Represcribing the Authorized Rate of Return for Interstate Services of Local Exchange Carriers, Order, 5 FCC Rcd 7507, 7532 at 1, 216 (1990) (``Rate-of-Return Prescription Order'') (subsequent history omitted). 10 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 61.38, 61.39. 11 47 U.S.C. 203. 12 47 C.F.R. 69.3(a), 61.58(a)(2)(ii). Annual tariffs for access services generally become effective July 1. 47 C.F.R. 69.3(f). 13 The maximum allowable rate of return is equal to the prescribed rate of return plus the amount specified in sections 65.700(a) or (b), of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 65.700(a),(b), which is a margin that the carrier may
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • based on the average schedule formulas approved by the Commission, and not on the basis of Farmers' actual costs, actual revenue from end users, or actual rate of return. 8. Effective July 1, 2005, Farmers left the NECA pool and became an issuing carrier for Kiesling Associates LLP Tariff F.C.C. No. 5 ("Kiesling Tariff"), which is governed by Commission rule 61.39(b)(2). The Kiesling Tariff contained separate switched access rates for Farmers. Farmers' interstate switched access service rates were filed on 15 days notice pursuant to section 204(a)(3) of the Act. 9. During the time period relevant to the Complaint, Farmers entered into a number of commercial arrangements with conference calling companies as a means to increase its interstate switched access traffic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • 12 month period of operations or are estimated to exceed $500,000 for a representative 12 month period. Local exchange carriers serving 50,000 or fewer access lines in a given study area that are described as subset 3 carriers in � 69.602 of this chapter may submit Access Tariff filings for that study area pursuant to either this section or � 61.39. However, the Commission may require any carrier to submit such information as may be necessary for a review of a tariff filing. This section (other than the preceding sentence of this paragraph) shall not apply to tariff filings proposing rates for services identified in � 61.42(d), (e), and (g). 24. Revise Section 61.38(b) to remove and reserve Section 61.38(b)(3). 25.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002473.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002473.txt
  • conversion and reduce the incentive to manipulate Commission rules. Waiver recipients must: (1) report to NECA on a combined basis for interstate average schedule and universal service purposes, and receive distributions on that basis as a consolidated company; (2) convert to cost-based settlement status if an average schedule affiliate in that study area converts to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) maintain common control over average schedule affiliates, so that average schedule status terminates when any of the affiliates are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned. See BPS Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 13825. We have always intended for these conditions to ensure that the waivers will not result in unintended effects on the petitioners' interstate revenue requirements or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 16010-11 (1997) (Access Charge Reform Order), aff'd sub. nom., Southwestern Bell v. FCC, 153 F.3d 523 (8th Cir. 1998). Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and GTE, and permitted other LECs to elect price cap regulation voluntarily, provided that all their affiliates also convert to price cap regulation and that they withdraw from the pools administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA). Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.txt
  • the conversion and reduce the incentive to manipulate Commission rules. Waiver recipients must (1) report to NECA on a combined basis for interstate average schedule and USF purposes, and receive distributions on that basis as a consolidated company; (2) convert to cost-based settlement status if an average schedule affiliate in that study area converts to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) maintain common control over average schedule affiliates, so that average schedule status terminates when any of the affiliates are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned. See BPS, 12 FCC Rcd at 13825. We have always intended for these conditions to ensure that the waivers will not result in unintended effects on the petitioners' interstate revenue requirements or result
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 10.28 -1.91 4.19 494449 C NAVAJO COMMUNICATIONS CO INC-NM 18.22 11.93 5.62 21.91 495105 C U S WEST, INC. - NM -7.08 3.16 -9.93 -86.73 TOTAL: NEW YORK 4.15 -0.19 4.35 -20.52 150071 C ARMSTRONG TEL. CO.-NY 6.37 1.34 4.96 13.58 150072 C FRONTIER COMM. OF AUSABLE VALLEY, INC. -5.81 5.79 -10.97 -47.48 150073 C BERKSHIRE TEL. CORP. 67.55 3.82 61.39 INFINITE 150076 A CASSADAGA TEL. CORP. 3.32 6.90 -3.35 0.00 150077 C CHAMPLAIN TEL. CO. -36.44 7.02 -40.61 -63.35 150078 C CHAUTAUQUA & ERIE TEL. CORP. 22.98 7.73 14.16 0.00 150079 C CHAZY & WESTPORT TEL. CORP. -0.40 4.61 -4.79 -13.53 150081 C CITIZENS TEL. CO. OF HAMMOND, NY -0.76 2.56 -3.24 -2.42 150084 C TACONIC TEL. CORP. 9.18 3.49
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.wp
  • rates; and (2) the mechanics of how PRTC's rates would be affected by its withdrawal from the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Carrier Common Line pool. See, e.g., TLD Petition at 9-14; ABETG/Vizcarondo Petition at 19-22; MCI WorldCom Comments at 4. 62 See, e.g., LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6816, � 241. 11 22. Pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules, PRTC has elected to provide interstate access service under rate of return regulation. Because GTE is subject to price cap regulation, however, PRTC will be required within 12 months of our approval of this transfer of control to file interstate access tariffs for Puerto Rico using the price cap methodology.58 Competing local and interexchange carriers claim
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090327.html
  • Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394 or Jodie May at (202) 418-0913. [45]DA-09-690A1.doc [46]DA-09-690A1.pdf [47]DA-09-690A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- JULY 1, 2009 ANNUAL ACCESS CHARGE TARIFF FILING. Established procedures for the 2009 filing of annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) for incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) subject to price caps and those ILECs subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 03/26/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-683). WCB [48]DA-09-683A1.doc [49]DA-09-683A1.pdf [50]DA-09-683A1.txt MATERIAL TO BE FILED IN SUPPORT OF THE 2009 ANNUAL ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. Set forth the Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) that all incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) should file to support the annual revisions to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110330.html
  • the petition for waiver. (Dkt No. 96-45 08-71 ). Action by: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 03/29/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-561). WCB [69]DA-11-561A1.doc [70]DA-11-561A1.pdf [71]DA-11-561A1.txt ANNUAL ACCESS CHARGE TARIFF FILINGS. Established procedures for the 2011 filing annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans for incumbent local exchange carriers subject to price caps and those ILECS subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 03/29/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-569). WCB [72]DA-11-569A1.doc [73]DA-11-569A1.pdf [74]DA-11-569A1.txt MATERIAL TO BE FILED IN SUPPORT OF 2011 ANNUAL ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. Set forth the Tariff Review Plans that all incumbent local exchange carriers must file to support the annual revisions to the rates in their
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-186A1.html
  • AT&T and other interexchange carriers (``IXCs'').15 5. Prior to March 31, 1994, Beehive charged IXCs access rates at the levels contained in the interstate access tariff filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (``NECA'') on behalf of its member companies.16 The NECA tariff specified a rate of approximately $.07 per terminating access minute.17 On March 31, 1994, pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules,18 Beehive withdrew from the NECA tariff and filed its own interstate access tariff (``Tariff'') specifying a terminating interstate access rate of $.47 per minute.19 That Tariff became effective on July 1, 1994.20 Although it contained its own access rates, Beehive's Tariff explicitly incorporated the non-rate regulations, terms, and conditions for access services set forth in NECA's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-195A1.html
  • FCC, 59 F.3d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (``MCI v. FCC''); Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. v. FCC , 989 F.2d 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (``Virgin Islands''); Represcribing the Authorized Rate of Return for Interstate Services of Local Exchange Carriers, Order, 5 FCC Rcd 7507, 7532 at 1, 216 (1990) (``Rate-of-Return Prescription Order'') (subsequent history omitted). 10 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 61.38, 61.39. 11 47 U.S.C. 203. 12 47 C.F.R. 69.3(a), 61.58(a)(2)(ii). Annual tariffs for access services generally become effective July 1. 47 C.F.R. 69.3(f). 13 The maximum allowable rate of return is equal to the prescribed rate of return plus the amount specified in sections 65.700(a) or (b), of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 65.700(a),(b), which is a margin that the carrier may
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • based on the average schedule formulas approved by the Commission, and not on the basis of Farmers' actual costs, actual revenue from end users, or actual rate of return. 8. Effective July 1, 2005, Farmers left the NECA pool and became an issuing carrier for Kiesling Associates LLP Tariff F.C.C. No. 5 ("Kiesling Tariff"), which is governed by Commission rule 61.39(b)(2). The Kiesling Tariff contained separate switched access rates for Farmers. Farmers' interstate switched access service rates were filed on 15 days notice pursuant to section 204(a)(3) of the Act. 9. During the time period relevant to the Complaint, Farmers entered into a number of commercial arrangements with conference calling companies as a means to increase its interstate switched access traffic
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/beehive2.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/beehive2.wp
  • in Nevada. Beehive first filed its own tariff in 1994, having previously charged the interstate local switching rates filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) on behalf of participating LECs. As a small LEC Beehive has the option of filing tariffs for traffic-sensitive interstate access charges under rules different from those that apply to larger LECs. See 47 C.F.R. 61.39(a). In addition, while the largest LECs--the regional Bell Operating Companies and GTE--must calculate their tariffs under the Commission's price cap regulations, Beehive can and did opt for rate of return regulation. See id. 61.41(a)(3); see also United States Tel. Ass'n v. FCC, ___ F.3d ____, 1999 WL 317035, at *1 (D.C. Cir. May 21, 1999). On July 22, 1997 Beehive
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/2011archive.html
  • local exchange carriers should file to support the annual revisions to the rates in their interstate access service tariffs. [76][Word] [77][Acrobat] [78][TRPShort Form] [79][TRP Long Form] [80][Rate of Return] 3/29/2011 Order: Established procedures for the 2011 filing annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans for incumbent local exchange carriers subject to price caps and those ILECS subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. [81][Word] [82][Acrobat] 3/17/2011 Public Notice: Comment Cycle Established For Notice Of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding Separations Freeze Extension. (Dkt No 80-286 ). Comments Due: 03/28/2011. Reply Comments Due: 04/04/2011. [83][Word] [84][Acrobat] 3/15/2011 Public Notice: FCC Announces First In A Series Of Workshops On Intercarrier Compensation/Universal Service Fund Reform. (Dkt No 10-90 01-92 96-45 05-337 07-135 03-109 09-51
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.pdf
  • No. 98-170 and CG Docket No. 04-208, Second Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd 6448, 6462, para. 28 (2005); Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11701, 11774, para. 136 (1998). 47 U.S.C. � 229(e). 47 C.F.R. � 61.45(d). 47 C.F.R. �� 61.38 and 61.39. RTG Comments at 7; United Utilities Reply Comments at 4. 47 U.S.C. � 1008(b). 47 U.S.C. � 1008(b)(2). First R&O, 20 FCC Rcd at 14990, para. 3. The Commission adopted system security requirements for telecommunications carriers in 1999. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 64.2100-64.2106. The Commission's rules provide guidance to carriers on policies and procedures for employee supervision and control,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf
  • compensation based on the average schedule formulas approved by the Commission, and not on the basis of Farmers' actual costs, actual revenue from end users, or actual rate of return. Effective July 1, 2005, Farmers left the NECA pool and became an issuing carrier for Kiesling Associates LLP Tariff F.C.C. No. 5 (``Kiesling Tariff''), which is governed by Commission rule 61.39(b)(2). The Kiesling Tariff contained separate switched access rates for Farmers. Farmers' interstate switched access service rates were filed on 15 days notice pursuant to section 204(a)(3) of the Act. During the time period relevant to the Complaint, Farmers entered into a number of commercial arrangements with conference calling companies as a means to increase its interstate switched access traffic and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.txt
  • conversion and reduce the incentive to manipulate Commission rules. Waiver recipients must: (1) report to NECA on a combined basis for interstate average schedule and universal service purposes, and receive distributions on that basis as a consolidated company; (2) convert to cost-based settlement status if an average schedule affiliate in that study area converts to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) maintain common control over average schedule affiliates, so that average schedule status terminates when any of the affiliates are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned. See BPS Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 13825. We have always intended for these conditions to ensure that the waivers will not result in unintended effects on the petitioners' interstate revenue requirements or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1105A1.txt
  • I. INTRODUCTION 1. We set forth herein the Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) that incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) should file to support the annual revisions to the rates in their interstate access service tariffs scheduled to become effective on July 3, 2001. The completion of the TRPs appended to this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in Sections 61.38, 61.39 and 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's Rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. 2. Based on the Bureau's experience in reviewing the TRPs in prior years, the submission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.txt
  • to be considered officially received on December 17, 2001. ILECs are reminded that there are remote filing sites available at the following addresses: 3. To facilitate the review of the interstate access charge tariffs to be filed to become effective on January 1, 2002, we hereby require all ILECs to submit cost support materials with their tariff filings. Although section 61.39 carriers do not routinely include cost support materials with their filings, we believe that cost support materials will be helpful if filed with the tariff, given the nature of the changes being made with this tariff filing. This tariff filing should be a revenue neutral tariff filing. Therefore, all calculations should be based on the demand data used in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.txt
  • the conversion and reduce the incentive to manipulate Commission rules. Waiver recipients must (1) report to NECA on a combined basis for interstate average schedule and USF purposes, and receive distributions on that basis as a consolidated company; (2) convert to cost-based settlement status if an average schedule affiliate in that study area converts to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) maintain common control over average schedule affiliates, so that average schedule status terminates when any of the affiliates are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned. See BPS, 12 FCC Rcd at 13825. We have always intended for these conditions to ensure that the waivers will not result in unintended effects on the petitioners' interstate revenue requirements or result
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A1.txt
  • to support revisions to the rates in their interstate access service tariffs. The completion of the TRPs will partially fulfill the requirements established in section 61.38 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and would normally not be required to file access service tariff revisions this year absent the requirements adopted in the Rate-of-Return Access Charge Reform Order. Each rate-of-return LEC subject to section 61.39 that files its own common line tariff must file revisions to reflect the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1308A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NECA ARC-1 Filing Date: COSTS TO BE MOVED TO COMMON LINE Filing Entity: NECA Period: Tariff Year July 2002 - June 2003 Transmittal Number : COSA: DATA REPORTED BY COMPANY TO NECA NECA USED IN NECA TARIFF SAC COMPANY NAME SET- TLE- MENT TYPE SECTION 61.38 0R 61.39 LINE PORT TRANSPORT (TIC) TIC REVENUES for 12- month period ending 6/30/01 ANNUALIZED LINE PORT TRANSPORT (TIC) TIC REVENUES for 12- month period ending 6/30/01 REASONS FOR DIFFERNCES/NOTES ON CALCULATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.txt
  • 2002 Released: July 1, 2002 By the Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division: Introduction Price cap local exchange carriers (LECs) and certain LECs subject to rate-of-return regulation are required by sections 69.3(h) and 69.3(f)(1) of the Commission's rules to file revisions to their interstate tariffs to become effective July 1, 2002. In addition, several rate-of-return LECs that are subject to section 61.39 of the rules and that file their own common line tariffs filed tariffs to reflect rule modifications made in the Rate-of-Return Access Charge Reform Order that became effective on July 1, 2002. These LECs filed their tariff transmittals on June 17, 2002, June 25, 2002, or June 28, 2002, as reflected in Appendix A. On June 24, 2002, AT&T Corporation,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.txt
  • accordance with our line port reallocation rules, rate-of-return carriers electing to use the thirty percent proxy in future tariff filings shall reallocate thirty percent of the revenue requirement for the test period underlying their tariff filing to the common line category. Thus, section 61.38 carriers shall apply the thirty percent proxy to their projected local switching revenue requirement, while section 61.39 carriers shall apply the thirty percent proxy to their historical local switching revenue requirement. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 204, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108, we reconsider, on our own
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.txt
  • Order, DA 02-888 at para. 20 (rel. Apr. 18, 2002) (citing Puerto Rico Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 61.41 or Section 54.303(a) of the Commission's Rules, CCB/CPD No. 99-36, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 9680, 9682-83 para. 5 (2000)). See Valor Petition at 5, 7; see also NECA Comments at 2; USTA Comments at 3. See 47 C.F.R. �� 61.39, 69.3(f)(2). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3553 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3553 % & � � F [ � h � `` � ``
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.txt
  • June 2002 with the annual access tariff filing. In a subsequent public notice, the Bureau will provide a format for a TRP to be submitted by all ILECs subject to rate-of-return regulation, including carriers that are required to file annual access tariffs in July, 2002 pursuant to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules, as well as carriers subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules that do not normally file access tariffs in even numbered years. TRPs are designed to display basic information on access charges in a uniform format in the most effective and least burdensome way possible. The Bureau updates the TRPs prior to each required filing of access charges to reflect changes in Commission rules. TRPs are subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.txt
  • 3. ILECs that file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 are required to file in even-numbered years and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Since 2002 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs including support material that includes a TRP. For the 2002 annual access tariff filing, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.txt
  • 3. ILECs that file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 are required to file in even-numbered years and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Since 2003 is an odd numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file revised access tariffs. For the 2003 annual access tariff filing, we are requiring the ILECs that do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1176A1.txt
  • this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. 2. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in even-numbered years and would normally not be required to file access service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.txt
  • Commission has previously imposed, to which the petitioners would assent upon grant of waiver, are as follows: (1) the requesting companies and their affiliates must make a combined report to NECA, including average schedule and USF-related concerns; (2) all affiliates must convert to cost-based settlements if any one affiliate converts from average schedule status to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) the companies' average schedule status may remain in effect only as long as the respective affiliates remain under common control. Id. NECA Comments at 3. NTCA Comments at 3-4. See NebCom, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Sections 61.41(c)(2) and 69.605(c) of the Commission's Rules, AAD File No. 97-50, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4487, 4492 para. 13 (Acc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1048A1.txt
  • ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. 2. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and would normally not be required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings if made this year, absent the requirements adopted in the Rate-of-Return Access Charge Reform Order. 3. The tariff filings of rate-of-return LECs subject to sections 61.38 and 61.39 must implement certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.txt
  • 3. ILECs that file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 are required to file in even-numbered years, and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2004 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs this year, including support material that includes a TRP. 4. Price cap ILECs are required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.txt
  • July 1, 2004 By the Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau: Introduction Price cap local exchange carriers (LECs) and certain LECs subject to rate-of-return regulation are required by sections 69.3(h) and 69.3(f)(1) of the Commission's rules to file revisions to their interstate tariffs to become effective July 1, 2004. In addition, several rate-of-return LECs that are subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules filed their own access tariffs because they chose to exit one or more of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (NECA) administered pools. LECs filed tariffs on June 16, 2004 and June 24, 2004, and subsequent revisions as reflected in Appendix A. AT&T Corp. (AT&T) and General Communication, Inc. (GCI) filed petitions to suspend and investigate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1038A1.txt
  • this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. 2. Rate-of-return LECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year, and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers are reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary for the review of a tariff filing. The completion of the attached TRP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.txt
  • 3. ILECs that file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 are required to file in even-numbered years, and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2005 is an odd-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file revised access tariffs this year. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.38 may elect to make a voluntary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • the filing, form, content, public notice periods, and accompanying support materials for tariffs. Part 61 rules also establish the pricing rules and related requirements that apply to incumbent local exchange carriers. Need: Section 61.33(e) requires all letters of transmittal for 14-day tariff filings to include an address and designated individual for personal service and a number for facsimile service. Sections 61.39(d) and 61.39(e) give smaller carriers providing service primarily to rural areas optional regulatory reforms that compliment the price cap system. These reforms are intended to reduce administrative burdens and increase flexibility, while continuing to ensure high service quality and universal service at reasonable rates. Sections 61.42(e)(1)(iii) and 61.42(e)(1)(iv) establish the price cap baskets for 800 data base access services and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.txt
  • most instances, carriers can or must file line counts and certifications on a quarterly basis. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. Part 54, Subpart J (Interstate Access Universal Service Support Mechanism) and Subpart K (Interstate Common Line Support Mechanism for Rate-of-Return Carriers). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.301. See Alliance Petition, 12-13; EATEL Petition at 6, 9. The Petitioners are subject to section 61.39 and file tariffs in odd numbered years to be effective for two years. They filed in 2005 based on costs for 2003-04. To the extent that any Petitioner included in its 2003-04 costs supporting its 2005 tariff filing any amounts calculated pursuant to section 54.301, the Petitioner must submit revised cost support materials excluding such amounts and adjust its interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian's FCC Tariff No. 2, only with respect to Hawaiian's 2006 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.42(g), 61.43. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hawaiian Telcom Inc.'s request for waiver of sections 61.38 and 61.49 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.39, 61.49, IS DENIED as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Hawaiian Telcom Inc. Petition for a Waiver of Sections 61.42(g), 61.38, and 61.49 of the Commission's Price Cap Rules for Advanced Services Formerly Offered by Verizon Hawaii, WCB/Pricing File No. 06-19 (filed Apr. 11, 2006) (Hawaiian Petition). See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.txt
  • tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. Further, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file in even-numbered years, and those filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2006 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs this year. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 may elect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-650A1.txt
  • are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers should file a Tariff Review Plan to support these revisions. The completion of the attached TRP will partially fulfill the requirements established in section 61.38 of the Commission's rules. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 electing to make a voluntary tariff filing at this time is reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.txt
  • tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under the rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. In addition, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file in even-numbered years. Those filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2007 is an odd-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.39 are required to file revised access tariffs this year. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.38 may elect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1484A1.pdf
  • to this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year, and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers are reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary for the review of a tariff filing. The completion of the attached TRP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.txt
  • filed their original tariff transmittals on June 15, 2007, or June 22, 2007, and subsequent revisions as reflected in Appendix A. AT&T Corporation (AT&T), Qwest Communications Corporation (Qwest), Sprint Nextel Corporation (Sprint Nextel), and Verizon (the Petitioners) filed petitions to suspend and investigate the tariffs of carriers leaving the NECA traffic-sensitive pool and filing their own tariffs pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. AT&T, General Communication Incorporated (GCI), and Verizon filed petitions to suspend and investigate NECA's Tariff No. 5. On June 26, 2007, NECA and a number of the LECs filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules filed replies to the petitions. In this Order, we suspend for one day and set for investigation the switched
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.txt
  • cases have been filed. Contemporaneously, the LECs that have been accused of this access stimulation have alleged that certain carriers have unreasonably blocked calls from those carriers' end-users to certain phone numbers terminating in the LECs' exchanges. On June 15, 2007, 29 carriers that were participating in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) traffic-sensitive tariffs filed individual tariffs under section 61.39 of the Commission rules. Qwest, Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint Nextel filed objections to these filings, alleging that it is likely that these tariffs will result in unjust and unreasonable rates. The complaining carriers assert the recent conduct of current section 61.39 carriers similarly situated to those that recently made such tariff filings raises serious questions regarding whether such carriers are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.txt
  • filings will remain just and reasonable if demand increases dramatically; (4) whether the Commission should require carriers subject to this investigation to include language in their tariffs to ensure that it has an opportunity to review a carrier's rates when a significant increase in local switching demand occurs; (5) whether the existing cost support requirements contained in sections 61.38 and 61.39 are adequate to permit the Commission to determine that the revised rates filed as a result of a significant increase in access traffic, pursuant to issue four above, are just and reasonable or whether additional data will be necessary; and (6) whether the rates specified in the suspended tariffs have remained, or will remain, just and reasonable during the investigation.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1255A1.txt
  • 182.39 Ashville OH0980 26.87% 1243 334.02 Athens (City) OH0029, 16.02% 6271 1004.86 Baltimore OH0847 28.78% 1159 333.51 Belle Center OH1539 30.19% 326 98.41 Berkshire OH1687 33.97% 806 273.81 Berne OH0405 20.67% 1836 379.55 Bremen OH0807 42.46% 483 205.09 Bucyrus (City) OH0054 18.46% 5559 1026.45 Bucyrus (Township) OH0474 18.46% 317 58.53 Cardington OH2170, 43.62% 754 328.93 OH2112 Carroll OH1049 32.48% 189 61.39 Centerburg OH1379 52.22% 504 263.20 Chesterville OH2173 36.50% 57 20.81 Circleville (City) OH0311 22.07% 5378 1187.17 Circleville (Township) OH0446 22.07% 917 202.42 Crestline OH0032 20.81% 2070 430.80 Crooksville OH0090 27.93% 968 270.32 Danville OH0091 42.32% 442 187.08 Darby (Pickaway) OH2424 36.04% 1259 453.78 Darby (Union) OH1240 27.60% 685 189.07 Delaware OH0513, 15.38% 9520 1463.83 OH0291 Dover (Union) OH2288 25.72% 800
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.txt
  • initially failed to move its marketing expenses from the Traffic-sensitive and Trunking Baskets to the Common-line basket, but resolved this issue in a subsequent filing. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). Century's Tariff FCC Nos. 2 & 3 are subject to price cap regulation. Century's Tariff FCC No.1 is subject to rate-of-return regulation. City of Brookings is a 61.39 carrier that is exiting NECA's tariff. Revises some 61.39 carrier rates and removes LaHarpe's access rates. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1562 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1562 � � � - @& $ � � � � �� � � ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.txt
  • file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. In addition, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file in even-numbered years. Those filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2008 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 may elect to make
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.txt
  • Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers should file a TRP to support these revisions. The completion of the attached TRP will partially fulfill the requirements established in section 61.38 of the Commission's rules. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 electing to make a voluntary tariff filing at this time is reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.txt
  • 2009 7-DAY TARIFF FILINGS: June 24, 2009 PETITIONS: June 26, 2009 REPLIES: June 29, 2009 (due no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) Eastern Time) I. INTRODUCTION This order establishes procedures for the 2009 filing of annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) for incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) subject to price caps and those ILECs subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. This order: (1) sets an effective date of July 1, 2009 for the July 2009 annual tariff filings; (2) establishes the dates for filing petitions to suspend or reject the ILEC tariff filing and replies to such petitions; and (3) addresses service of the petitions and replies. It also sets the date that price cap carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.txt
  • to this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year, and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers are reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary for the review of a tariff filing. The completion of the attached TRP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.txt
  • file tariffs under the price cap ratemaking methodology are required to file revised annual access tariffs every year. ILECs that file tariffs under rate-of-return ratemaking methodology are required to file every other year. In addition, ILECs filing pursuant to the requirements of section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file in even-numbered years. Those filing pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting material with the revised tariff. Because 2010 is an even-numbered year, only the price cap ILECs and the ILECs filing pursuant to section 61.38 are required to file revised access tariffs this year. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 may elect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.txt
  • Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers should file a TRP to support these revisions. The completion of the attached TRP will partially fulfill the requirements established in section 61.38 of the Commission's rules. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions in odd-numbered years and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. Any rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 electing to make a voluntary tariff filing at this time is reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.txt
  • 28, 2011 (due no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) Eastern Time) REPLIES: June 29, 2011 (due no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) Eastern Time) I. INTRODUCTION This order establishes procedures for the 2011 filing of annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) for incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) subject to price caps and those ILECs subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. This order (1) sets an effective date of July 1, 2011 for the July 2011 annual tariff filings; (2) establishes the dates for filing petitions to suspend or reject an ILEC tariff filing and replies to such petitions; and (3) addresses service of the petitions and replies. It also sets the date that price cap carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.txt
  • to this document will partially fulfill the requirements established in sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The annual TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an odd-numbered year, and are not required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers are reminded that the Commission may require the submission of such information as may be necessary for the review of a tariff filing. The completion of the attached TRP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.txt
  • the transition. The Commission also adopted a transitional recovery mechanism, including a newly tariffed Access Recovery Charge (ARC), which is intended to partially mitigate the effect of reduced intercarrier revenues on carriers. Carriers reflected these new rules in their annual access charge tariff filings for 2012. In addition, pursuant to the USF/ICC Transformation Order, certain rate-of-return carriers subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules also filed annual access charge tariff filings that included an ARC rate. Carriers submitted their annual access tariff filings on either June 18, 2012, or June 26, 2012. These tariffs were filed pursuant to sections 61.41 through 61.49 of the Commission's rules for the price cap LECs, section 61.38 for rate-of-return LECs regulated pursuant to that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.txt
  • FILINGS: June 26, 2012 PETITIONS: June 28, 2012 REPLIES: June 29, 2012 I. INTRODUCTION This order establishes procedures for the 2012 filing of annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) for incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) subject to price caps, as well as rate-of-return ILECs subject to Section 61.38 of the Commission's rules and those ILECs subject Section 61.39 of the Commission's Rules that elect to file an Access Recovery Charge (ARC) as part of the ICC order recovery mechanism and/or revise their rates. This order (1) sets an effective date of July 3, 2012 for the July 2012 annual access charge tariff filings; (2) establishes the dates for filing petitions to suspend or reject an ILEC tariff filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.txt
  • to partially mitigate the effect of reduced intercarrier revenues on carriers. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules are required to file access service tariff revisions this year, an even-numbered year, and are required to submit supporting documentation with their tariff filings. These carriers should file a TRP to support these revisions. Rate-of-return ILECs subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules historically would not have been required to file access service tariffs this year, since they file revisions in odd-numbered years. Pursuant to the USF/ICC Transformation Order, however, if a rate-of-return ILEC subject to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules elects to tariff and charge end users an ARC, that ILEC must file a TRP with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • by price indices that have been adjusted annually pursuant to formulae set forth in our Part 61 rules. Price cap carriers whose interstate access charges are set by these pricing rules are 24 Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. 25 The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and GTE, and permitted other LECs to adopt price cap regulation voluntarily, provided that all their affiliates also convert to price cap regulation and that they withdraw from the NECA pools. Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, Second Report and Order, CC Docket No. 87-313, 5 FCC Red
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247885A1.txt
  • VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 18M0F8F- 79.40 dBW FM ANALOG VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0F8F 65.39 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G1F- 71.92 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 9M00G1F 76.18 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F- 77.94 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 61.39 dBW FM ANALOG AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 200KF3F 48.22 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 38K4G7W 49.75 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 54K6G7W- 77.93 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 35M9G7W 60.29 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 618KD7W- 75.45 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 20M3D7W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250829A1.txt
  • VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 18M0F8F- 72.70 dBW FM ANALOG VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0F8F 65.39 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G1F- 71.92 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 9M00G1F 72.70 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F- 72.70 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 61.39 dBW FM ANALOG AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 200KF3F 48.22 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 38K4G7W 49.75 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 54K6G7W- 72.70 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 35M9G7W 60.29 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 618KG7W- 72.70 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 20M3G7W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266601A1.txt
  • dBW One 36Mbit MCPC digital carrier for voice & data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () E060274 SES-LIC-20060719-01202E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority ORLANDO HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 VARIOUS LOCATION: VERTEX 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.5m SF FAW 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) KA313 SES-MOD-20060519-00858E Class of Station: Other Application for Modification Telenor Satellite, Inc. Page 20 of 33 Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service, Other Telenor Satellite, Inc. seeks authority to authorize up to 550 Ku-band terminals for ESV operation. These terminals, all with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267151A1.txt
  • MHz 36M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () Page 5 of 57 E060274 SES-LIC-20060719-01202E Date Effective: 08/29/2006 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 08/29/2006 - 08/29/2021 Application for Authority ORLANDO HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 VARIOUS LOCATION: VERTEX 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.5m SF FAW 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E040305 SES-MOD-20060707-01139E Date Effective: 08/23/2006 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 08/23/2004 - 08/23/2019 Application for Modification American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 VARIOUS LOCATION: ND SATCOM 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267233A1.txt
  • 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F QPSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/ DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060336 SES-LIC-20060824-01504E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority Meredith Corporation - WSMV Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 WSMV, VARIOUS LOCATION: AvL 1 1.2 meters ANTENNA ID: 1200K DSNG 61.39 dBW PSK Digital Video w/ digital audio/data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060309 SES-LIC-20060824-01508E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority West Virginia Media Holdings, LLC Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 904 PIKE STREET CLARKSBURG, WV, 26301, HARRISON, VARIOUS LOCATION: AVL Technology 1 1.2 meters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267839A1.txt
  • 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Page 18 of 35 E060336 SES-LIC-20060824-01504E Date Effective: 10/10/2006 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 10/10/2006 - 10/10/2021 Application for Authority Meredith Corporation - WSMV Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 WSMV, VARIOUS LOCATION: AvL 1 1.2 meters ANTENNA ID: 1200K DSNG 61.39 dBW PSK Digital Video w/ digital audio/data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060309 SES-LIC-20060824-01508E Date Effective: 10/10/2006 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 10/10/2006 - 10/10/2021 Application for Authority West Virginia Media Holdings, LLC Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 904 PIKE STREET CLARKSBURG, WV,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271873A1.txt
  • GE-5 - (79 W.L.) 1 - AMSC-9 - (85 W.L.) 1 - IA-7 - (129 W.L.) 1 - IA-8 - (89 W.L.) E070044 SES-LIC-20070323-00398E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 (TEMP FIXED), VARIOUS LOCATION: VERTEX 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.5M SF FAW 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Page 2 of 14 E000674 SES-MOD-20070302-00291E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Modification RADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service "CORECTION" to the FCC Form 312-Schedule B Technical and Operation Description for the Antenna Gain Transmit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272809A1.txt
  • (325.5 E.L.) Atwater 574 - SATMEX-5 - (116.8 W.L.) E070044 SES-LIC-20070323-00398E Date Effective: 04/30/2007 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 04/30/2007 - 04/30/2022 Application for Authority OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 (TEMP FIXED), VARIOUS LOCATION: VERTEX 1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 1.5M SF FAW Page 6 of 30 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W/DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) SES-LIC-INTR2007-00933E Date Effective: 04/24/2007 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Withdrawn Application for Authority NYT MANAGEMENT SERVICES Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: Transportable Various Locations Throughtout the United States LOCATION: Communications A1 1.5 meters ANTENNA ID: NewsSwift 63.65
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280041A1.pdf
  • 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7F PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7F 52.30 dBW DIGITAL DATA CARRIER 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 512KG7D MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 66.80 dBW PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M50G7D PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 2M50G7D 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F 64.50 dBW MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M87G7W 58.20 dBW MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M87G7W Points of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280763A1.pdf
  • 36M0G7F PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7F Page 3 of 7 52.30 dBW DIGITAL DATA CARRIER 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 512KG7D MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 66.80 dBW PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M50G7D PSK, DATA, FAX, AUDIO, VOICE 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 2M50G7D 61.39 dBW PSK DIGITAL VIDEO W DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F 64.50 dBW MCPC DIGITAL CARRIER FOR VIDEO, VOICE DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M87G7W 58.20 dBW MCPC DIGITAL ENCODED AUDIO AND DATA@2.1 MBPS, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M87G7W Points of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295250A1.txt
  • VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 18M0F8F- 72.70 dBW FM ANALOG VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0F8F 65.39 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G1F- 71.92 dBW SINGLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 9M00G1F 72.70 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M0G7F- 72.70 dBW MULTIPLE CHAN/CARRIER DIGITAL VIDEO/AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 61.39 dBW FM ANALOG AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 200KF3F 48.22 dBW DIGITAL AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 38K4G7W 49.75 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 54K6G7W- Page 14 of 39 72.70 dBW QPSK, 8PSK DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 35M9G7W 60.29 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 618KG7W- 72.70 dBW 16QAM DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.txt
  • of regulation provided in �61.60(d). Path B LEC. A non-price cap LEC that chooses Path B pursuant to �61.60. * * * * * Revenue per line (RPL). A settlement method used in Path A incentive regulation calculated pursuant to �61.62(a)(1)(B). * * * * * * * * * * Subpart E - General Rules for Dominant Carriers Section 61.39(b)(4)(ii) is amended by replacing the phrase ``carrier common line pool'' with the phrase ``pool administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association.'' Section 61.41(c) is amended by adding the following subsection (4): �61.41 * * * * * (c) * * * * * (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of �61.42(c)(1) and (2) above, when a Path A LEC or Path B
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.txt
  • collects this data for the purpose of preparing its annual tariff filings. In accordance with our rules, NECA develops its data collections independently. See id. at �� 69.605, 69.606. Rate-of-return carriers that are not members of the common line pool submit forecasted common line costs directly to the Commission as part of their tariff filings. See id. at �� 61.38, 61.39. We understand that, although projected common line costs are filed by individual carriers with NECA in March or April, carriers do not finalize their reports until early June, in time for NECA to prepare and file its annual interstate access service tariff with the Commission. In order to enable USAC to calculate and begin distributing Interstate Common Line support on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.txt
  • the additional services sold as a result, will provide some substantial recovery for numbering administration costs, including the costs of implementing thousands-block number pooling. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.45(d). For rate-of-return carriers, of course, costs arising from thousands-block number pooling would be treated in the same manner as other costs in each carrier's biennial rate adjustments. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. See NECA Comments at 3; SBC Comments at 25; Verizon Comments at 5. See Ad Hoc Comments at 31-33; Joint Consumer Comments to First Report and Order at 42; General Services Administration Reply Comments to First Report and Order at 16-17. See supra at n.96 and accompanying text (citing First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7625, para. 122).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.txt
  • to AT&T and other interexchange carriers (``IXCs''). Prior to March 31, 1994, Beehive charged IXCs access rates at the levels contained in the interstate access tariff filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (``NECA'') on behalf of its member companies. The NECA tariff specified a rate of approximately $.07 per terminating access minute. On March 31, 1994, pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules, Beehive withdrew from the NECA tariff and filed its own interstate access tariff (``Tariff'') specifying a terminating interstate access rate of $.47 per minute. That Tariff became effective on July 1, 1994. Although it contained its own access rates, Beehive's Tariff explicitly incorporated the non-rate regulations, terms, and conditions for access services set forth in NECA's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-195A1.txt
  • 59 F.3d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (``MCI v. FCC''); Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. v. FCC , 989 F.2d 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (``Virgin Islands''); Represcribing the Authorized Rate of Return for Interstate Services of Local Exchange Carriers, Order, 5 FCC Rcd 7507, 7532 at �� 1, 216 (1990) (``Rate-of-Return Prescription Order'') (subsequent history omitted). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 61.38, 61.39. 47 U.S.C. � 203. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.3(a), 61.58(a)(2)(ii). Annual tariffs for access services generally become effective July 1. 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(f). The maximum allowable rate of return is equal to the prescribed rate of return plus the amount specified in sections 65.700(a) or (b), of our rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 65.700(a),(b), which is a margin that the carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.txt
  • GCI that pooling is inconsistent with pricing flexibility. While pooling involves a degree of averaging and risk sharing that would not exist if carriers filed their own tariffs, this is the case whether pricing flexibility is involved or not. Rate-of-return carriers subject to section 61.38 of our rules must file cost support with their tariffs, and those subject to section 61.39 must be prepared to submit cost support upon request. This supporting material will include a clear delineation of the geographically deaveraged pricing zones. It will also describe the process used to establish rates, whether on an individual carrier basis or through the use of some aggregation approach, such as the banding NECA currently uses for some rate elements, along with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
  • to serve the geographic area in which the interexchange carrier or other person's point of demarcation is located.'' 47 C.F.R. � 69.2(rr). See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14227, para. 10. Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12968, paras. 13, 15. The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and GTE, and permitted other LECs to elect price cap regulation voluntarily, provided that all their affiliates also convert to price cap regulation and that they withdraw from the pools administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA). Policy and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.txt
  • No. 98-170 and CG Docket No. 04-208, Second Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd 6448, 6462, para. 28 (2005); Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11701, 11774, para. 136 (1998). 47 U.S.C. � 229(e). 47 C.F.R. � 61.45(d). 47 C.F.R. �� 61.38 and 61.39. RTG Comments at 7; United Utilities Reply Comments at 4. 47 U.S.C. � 1008(b). 47 U.S.C. � 1008(b)(2). First R&O, 20 FCC Rcd at 14990, para. 3. The Commission adopted system security requirements for telecommunications carriers in 1999. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 64.2100-64.2106. The Commission's rules provide guidance to carriers on policies and procedures for employee supervision and control,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.txt
  • compensation based on the average schedule formulas approved by the Commission, and not on the basis of Farmers' actual costs, actual revenue from end users, or actual rate of return. Effective July 1, 2005, Farmers left the NECA pool and became an issuing carrier for Kiesling Associates LLP Tariff F.C.C. No. 5 (``Kiesling Tariff''), which is governed by Commission rule 61.39(b)(2). The Kiesling Tariff contained separate switched access rates for Farmers. Farmers' interstate switched access service rates were filed on 15 days notice pursuant to section 204(a)(3) of the Act. During the time period relevant to the Complaint, Farmers entered into a number of commercial arrangements with conference calling companies as a means to increase its interstate switched access traffic and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.txt
  • in excess of costs are shared among all pool members. Cost and average schedule carriers may choose to enter or leave the NECA pool on July 1 of any year by providing notice to NECA by the preceding March 1. Alternatively, a rate-of-return carrier may file access tariffs pursuant to the provisions of section 61.38 (section 61.38 carrier) or section 61.39 (section 61.39 carrier). Under section 61.38, a carrier is required to file access tariffs in even numbered years to be effective for a two-year period. A section 61.38 carrier files tariffed rates based on its projected costs and demand and targets its rates to earn an 11.25 percent return. If the demand of a section 61.38 carrier increases above the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-210A1.txt
  • filings will remain just and reasonable if demand increases dramatically; (4) whether the Commission should require carriers subject to this investigation to include language in their tariffs to ensure that it has an opportunity to review a carrier's rates when a significant increase in local switching demand occurs; (5) whether the existing cost support requirements contained in sections 61.38 and 61.39 of the Commission's rules are adequate to permit the Commission to determine that the revised rates filed as a result of a significant increase in access traffic, pursuant to issue four above, are just and reasonable or whether additional data will be necessary; and (6) whether the rates specified in the suspended tariffs have remained, or will remain, just and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • this chapter. (d) International carriers must certify that they are authorized under Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to provide service, and reference the FCC file number of that authorization. (e) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, any incumbent local exchange carrier choosing to file an Access Tariff under �61.39 must include in the transmittal: (1) A summary of the filing's basic rates, terms and conditions; (2) A statement concerning whether any prior Commission facility authorization necessary to the implementation of the tariff has been obtained; and (3) A statement that the filing is made pursuant to �61.39. (f) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.txt
  • interstate access tariffs: (1) participation in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Tariff No. 5, which sets forth interstate access charges for participating LECs; (2) filing a tariff pursuant to section 61.38 of the Commission's rules, which would be based on projected costs and demand; or (3) for carriers with 50,000 or fewer lines, filing a tariff pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules, which would be based on historical costs and demand. Most rate-of-return LECs participate in a traffic-sensitive pool managed by NECA and participate in the traffic-sensitive tariff filed annually by NECA on behalf of participating members. Interstate access rates in the traffic-sensitive tariff are set based on the projected aggregate costs (or average schedule settlements) and demand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • tell if the condition had been met. Remedies If a LEC meets both conditions of the definition, it must file a revised tariff except under certain limited circumstances. As explained in more detail below, a rate-of-return LEC must file its own cost-based tariff under section 61.38 of the Commission's rules and may not file based on historical costs under section 61.39 of the Commission's rules or participate in the NECA traffic-sensitive tariff. If a competitive LEC meets the definition, it must benchmark its tariffed access rates to the rates of the price cap LEC with the lowest interstate switched access rates in the state, rather than to the rates of the BOC or the largest incumbent LEC in the state (as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • this chapter. (d) International carriers must certify that they are authorized under Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to provide service, and reference the FCC file number of that authorization. (e) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, any incumbent local exchange carrier choosing to file an Access Tariff under �61.39 must include in the transmittal: (1) A summary of the filing's basic rates, terms and conditions; (2) A statement concerning whether any prior Commission facility authorization necessary to the implementation of the tariff has been obtained; and (3) A statement that the filing is made pursuant to �61.39. (f) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • 12 month period of operations or are estimated to exceed $500,000 for a representative 12 month period. Local exchange carriers serving 50,000 or fewer access lines in a given study area that are described as subset 3 carriers in � 69.602 of this chapter may submit Access Tariff filings for that study area pursuant to either this section or � 61.39. However, the Commission may require any carrier to submit such information as may be necessary for a review of a tariff filing. This section (other than the preceding sentence of this paragraph) shall not apply to tariff filings proposing rates for services identified in � 61.42(d), (e), and (g). 24. Revise Section 61.38(b) to remove and reserve Section 61.38(b)(3). 25.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 16010-11 (1997) (Access Charge Reform Order), aff'd sub. nom., Southwestern Bell v. FCC, 153 F.3d 523 (8th Cir. 1998). Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and GTE, and permitted other LECs to elect price cap regulation voluntarily, provided that all their affiliates also convert to price cap regulation and that they withdraw from the pools administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA). Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.wp
  • rates; and (2) the mechanics of how PRTC's rates would be affected by its withdrawal from the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Carrier Common Line pool. See, e.g., TLD Petition at 9-14; ABETG/Vizcarondo Petition at 19-22; MCI WorldCom Comments at 4. 62 See, e.g., LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6816, � 241. 11 22. Pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules, PRTC has elected to provide interstate access service under rate of return regulation. Because GTE is subject to price cap regulation, however, PRTC will be required within 12 months of our approval of this transfer of control to file interstate access tariffs for Puerto Rico using the price cap methodology.58 Competing local and interexchange carriers claim
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-186A1.html
  • AT&T and other interexchange carriers (``IXCs'').15 5. Prior to March 31, 1994, Beehive charged IXCs access rates at the levels contained in the interstate access tariff filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (``NECA'') on behalf of its member companies.16 The NECA tariff specified a rate of approximately $.07 per terminating access minute.17 On March 31, 1994, pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules,18 Beehive withdrew from the NECA tariff and filed its own interstate access tariff (``Tariff'') specifying a terminating interstate access rate of $.47 per minute.19 That Tariff became effective on July 1, 1994.20 Although it contained its own access rates, Beehive's Tariff explicitly incorporated the non-rate regulations, terms, and conditions for access services set forth in NECA's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-195A1.html
  • FCC, 59 F.3d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (``MCI v. FCC''); Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. v. FCC , 989 F.2d 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (``Virgin Islands''); Represcribing the Authorized Rate of Return for Interstate Services of Local Exchange Carriers, Order, 5 FCC Rcd 7507, 7532 at 1, 216 (1990) (``Rate-of-Return Prescription Order'') (subsequent history omitted). 10 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 61.38, 61.39. 11 47 U.S.C. 203. 12 47 C.F.R. 69.3(a), 61.58(a)(2)(ii). Annual tariffs for access services generally become effective July 1. 47 C.F.R. 69.3(f). 13 The maximum allowable rate of return is equal to the prescribed rate of return plus the amount specified in sections 65.700(a) or (b), of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 65.700(a),(b), which is a margin that the carrier may
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • based on the average schedule formulas approved by the Commission, and not on the basis of Farmers' actual costs, actual revenue from end users, or actual rate of return. 8. Effective July 1, 2005, Farmers left the NECA pool and became an issuing carrier for Kiesling Associates LLP Tariff F.C.C. No. 5 ("Kiesling Tariff"), which is governed by Commission rule 61.39(b)(2). The Kiesling Tariff contained separate switched access rates for Farmers. Farmers' interstate switched access service rates were filed on 15 days notice pursuant to section 204(a)(3) of the Act. 9. During the time period relevant to the Complaint, Farmers entered into a number of commercial arrangements with conference calling companies as a means to increase its interstate switched access traffic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • 12 month period of operations or are estimated to exceed $500,000 for a representative 12 month period. Local exchange carriers serving 50,000 or fewer access lines in a given study area that are described as subset 3 carriers in � 69.602 of this chapter may submit Access Tariff filings for that study area pursuant to either this section or � 61.39. However, the Commission may require any carrier to submit such information as may be necessary for a review of a tariff filing. This section (other than the preceding sentence of this paragraph) shall not apply to tariff filings proposing rates for services identified in � 61.42(d), (e), and (g). 24. Revise Section 61.38(b) to remove and reserve Section 61.38(b)(3). 25.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002473.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002473.txt
  • conversion and reduce the incentive to manipulate Commission rules. Waiver recipients must: (1) report to NECA on a combined basis for interstate average schedule and universal service purposes, and receive distributions on that basis as a consolidated company; (2) convert to cost-based settlement status if an average schedule affiliate in that study area converts to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) maintain common control over average schedule affiliates, so that average schedule status terminates when any of the affiliates are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned. See BPS Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 13825. We have always intended for these conditions to ensure that the waivers will not result in unintended effects on the petitioners' interstate revenue requirements or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 16010-11 (1997) (Access Charge Reform Order), aff'd sub. nom., Southwestern Bell v. FCC, 153 F.3d 523 (8th Cir. 1998). Since 1981, the Commission has allowed certain smaller incumbent LECs to base their access rates on historic, rather than projected, cost and demand. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. The Commission required price cap regulation for the BOCs and GTE, and permitted other LECs to elect price cap regulation voluntarily, provided that all their affiliates also convert to price cap regulation and that they withdraw from the pools administered by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA). Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.txt
  • the conversion and reduce the incentive to manipulate Commission rules. Waiver recipients must (1) report to NECA on a combined basis for interstate average schedule and USF purposes, and receive distributions on that basis as a consolidated company; (2) convert to cost-based settlement status if an average schedule affiliate in that study area converts to cost-based settlements, or elects section 61.39 treatment; and (3) maintain common control over average schedule affiliates, so that average schedule status terminates when any of the affiliates are sold, transferred, or otherwise assigned. See BPS, 12 FCC Rcd at 13825. We have always intended for these conditions to ensure that the waivers will not result in unintended effects on the petitioners' interstate revenue requirements or result
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 10.28 -1.91 4.19 494449 C NAVAJO COMMUNICATIONS CO INC-NM 18.22 11.93 5.62 21.91 495105 C U S WEST, INC. - NM -7.08 3.16 -9.93 -86.73 TOTAL: NEW YORK 4.15 -0.19 4.35 -20.52 150071 C ARMSTRONG TEL. CO.-NY 6.37 1.34 4.96 13.58 150072 C FRONTIER COMM. OF AUSABLE VALLEY, INC. -5.81 5.79 -10.97 -47.48 150073 C BERKSHIRE TEL. CORP. 67.55 3.82 61.39 INFINITE 150076 A CASSADAGA TEL. CORP. 3.32 6.90 -3.35 0.00 150077 C CHAMPLAIN TEL. CO. -36.44 7.02 -40.61 -63.35 150078 C CHAUTAUQUA & ERIE TEL. CORP. 22.98 7.73 14.16 0.00 150079 C CHAZY & WESTPORT TEL. CORP. -0.40 4.61 -4.79 -13.53 150081 C CITIZENS TEL. CO. OF HAMMOND, NY -0.76 2.56 -3.24 -2.42 150084 C TACONIC TEL. CORP. 9.18 3.49
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.wp
  • rates; and (2) the mechanics of how PRTC's rates would be affected by its withdrawal from the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Carrier Common Line pool. See, e.g., TLD Petition at 9-14; ABETG/Vizcarondo Petition at 19-22; MCI WorldCom Comments at 4. 62 See, e.g., LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6816, � 241. 11 22. Pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules, PRTC has elected to provide interstate access service under rate of return regulation. Because GTE is subject to price cap regulation, however, PRTC will be required within 12 months of our approval of this transfer of control to file interstate access tariffs for Puerto Rico using the price cap methodology.58 Competing local and interexchange carriers claim
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090327.html
  • Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394 or Jodie May at (202) 418-0913. [45]DA-09-690A1.doc [46]DA-09-690A1.pdf [47]DA-09-690A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- JULY 1, 2009 ANNUAL ACCESS CHARGE TARIFF FILING. Established procedures for the 2009 filing of annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) for incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) subject to price caps and those ILECs subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 03/26/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-683). WCB [48]DA-09-683A1.doc [49]DA-09-683A1.pdf [50]DA-09-683A1.txt MATERIAL TO BE FILED IN SUPPORT OF THE 2009 ANNUAL ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. Set forth the Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) that all incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) should file to support the annual revisions to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110330.html
  • the petition for waiver. (Dkt No. 96-45 08-71 ). Action by: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 03/29/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-561). WCB [69]DA-11-561A1.doc [70]DA-11-561A1.pdf [71]DA-11-561A1.txt ANNUAL ACCESS CHARGE TARIFF FILINGS. Established procedures for the 2011 filing annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans for incumbent local exchange carriers subject to price caps and those ILECS subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 03/29/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-569). WCB [72]DA-11-569A1.doc [73]DA-11-569A1.pdf [74]DA-11-569A1.txt MATERIAL TO BE FILED IN SUPPORT OF 2011 ANNUAL ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. Set forth the Tariff Review Plans that all incumbent local exchange carriers must file to support the annual revisions to the rates in their
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-186A1.html
  • AT&T and other interexchange carriers (``IXCs'').15 5. Prior to March 31, 1994, Beehive charged IXCs access rates at the levels contained in the interstate access tariff filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (``NECA'') on behalf of its member companies.16 The NECA tariff specified a rate of approximately $.07 per terminating access minute.17 On March 31, 1994, pursuant to section 61.39 of the Commission's rules,18 Beehive withdrew from the NECA tariff and filed its own interstate access tariff (``Tariff'') specifying a terminating interstate access rate of $.47 per minute.19 That Tariff became effective on July 1, 1994.20 Although it contained its own access rates, Beehive's Tariff explicitly incorporated the non-rate regulations, terms, and conditions for access services set forth in NECA's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-195A1.html
  • FCC, 59 F.3d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (``MCI v. FCC''); Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. v. FCC , 989 F.2d 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (``Virgin Islands''); Represcribing the Authorized Rate of Return for Interstate Services of Local Exchange Carriers, Order, 5 FCC Rcd 7507, 7532 at 1, 216 (1990) (``Rate-of-Return Prescription Order'') (subsequent history omitted). 10 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 61.38, 61.39. 11 47 U.S.C. 203. 12 47 C.F.R. 69.3(a), 61.58(a)(2)(ii). Annual tariffs for access services generally become effective July 1. 47 C.F.R. 69.3(f). 13 The maximum allowable rate of return is equal to the prescribed rate of return plus the amount specified in sections 65.700(a) or (b), of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 65.700(a),(b), which is a margin that the carrier may
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • based on the average schedule formulas approved by the Commission, and not on the basis of Farmers' actual costs, actual revenue from end users, or actual rate of return. 8. Effective July 1, 2005, Farmers left the NECA pool and became an issuing carrier for Kiesling Associates LLP Tariff F.C.C. No. 5 ("Kiesling Tariff"), which is governed by Commission rule 61.39(b)(2). The Kiesling Tariff contained separate switched access rates for Farmers. Farmers' interstate switched access service rates were filed on 15 days notice pursuant to section 204(a)(3) of the Act. 9. During the time period relevant to the Complaint, Farmers entered into a number of commercial arrangements with conference calling companies as a means to increase its interstate switched access traffic
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/beehive2.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/beehive2.wp
  • in Nevada. Beehive first filed its own tariff in 1994, having previously charged the interstate local switching rates filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) on behalf of participating LECs. As a small LEC Beehive has the option of filing tariffs for traffic-sensitive interstate access charges under rules different from those that apply to larger LECs. See 47 C.F.R. 61.39(a). In addition, while the largest LECs--the regional Bell Operating Companies and GTE--must calculate their tariffs under the Commission's price cap regulations, Beehive can and did opt for rate of return regulation. See id. 61.41(a)(3); see also United States Tel. Ass'n v. FCC, ___ F.3d ____, 1999 WL 317035, at *1 (D.C. Cir. May 21, 1999). On July 22, 1997 Beehive
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/2011archive.html
  • local exchange carriers should file to support the annual revisions to the rates in their interstate access service tariffs. [76][Word] [77][Acrobat] [78][TRPShort Form] [79][TRP Long Form] [80][Rate of Return] 3/29/2011 Order: Established procedures for the 2011 filing annual access charge tariffs and Tariff Review Plans for incumbent local exchange carriers subject to price caps and those ILECS subject to Section 61.39 of the Commission's rules. [81][Word] [82][Acrobat] 3/17/2011 Public Notice: Comment Cycle Established For Notice Of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding Separations Freeze Extension. (Dkt No 80-286 ). Comments Due: 03/28/2011. Reply Comments Due: 04/04/2011. [83][Word] [84][Acrobat] 3/15/2011 Public Notice: FCC Announces First In A Series Of Workshops On Intercarrier Compensation/Universal Service Fund Reform. (Dkt No 10-90 01-92 96-45 05-337 07-135 03-109 09-51