FCC Web Documents citing 63.13

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1383A1.txt
  • Review - Reform of the International Settlements Policy and Associated Filing Requirements, FCC 99-73, released May 6, 1999, 64 Fed. Reg. 34, 734 (June 29, 1999). An updated version of Sections 63.09­.24 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/telecomrules.html. ISP-PDR-20000913-00029 SOUTHWESTERN BELL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Date of Action: 06/06/2001 Pursuant to Section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 63.13, the Chief, Telecommunications Division, grants the above-referenced petition for reclassification as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-Hungary route filed by Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc. (SBCS) and named subsidiaries and affiliates of SBCS [hereinafter the SBC companies]. The petition states that Ameritech Corporation, an affiliate of the SBCS companies, has divested
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1473A1.txt
  • International Settlements Policy and Associated Filing Requirements, FCC 99-73, released May 6, 1999, 64 Fed. Reg. 34, 734 (June 29, 1999). An updated version of Sections 63.09­.24 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/telecomrules.html. ISP-PDR-20010507-00028 CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Date of Action: 06/20/2001 Cable & Wireless USA, Inc., pursuant to Section 63.13 of the Commission's Rules, requests modification of dominant to non-dominant regulatory status for the provision of international services on the routes between the United States and the Philippines, Thailand, Tonga, and Hong Kong. Grant of Authority Page 1 of 5 INFORMATIVE ITC-214-19991122-00728 PCCW PACIFIC LTD. Pursuant to Section 63.21(i) of the Commission's Rules, PCCW Enterprises Limited hereby notifies the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.txt
  • rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. For further information, contact David Strickland, International Bureau, at (202) 418-0977. - FCC - List of Foreign Telecommunications Carriers that are Presumed to Possess Market Power in Foreign Telecommunications Markets, Public Notice, DA 99-809 (correction rel. June 18, 1999), at http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da990809.tx t. Pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, a carrier that seeks to modify its regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant on a particular route must provide information to demonstrate that it qualifies for non-dominant classification under to section 63.10 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10. See 47 C.F.R. 63.10(a)(3). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.txt
  • § 1.1205(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. For further information, contact David Strickland, International Bureau, at (202) 418-0977. List of Foreign Telecommunications Carriers that are Presumed to Possess Market Power in Foreign Telecommunications Markets, Public Notice, DA 99-809 (correction rel. June 18, 1999), at http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da990809.tx t. Pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, a carrier that seeks to modify its regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant on a particular route must provide information to demonstrate that it qualifies for non-dominant classification under to section 63.10 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10. See 47 C.F.R. 63.10(a)(3). Petitioners allege that Brasil Telecom cannot offer inter-regional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.txt
  • not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1205(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. For further information, contact David Strickland, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1460. Pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, a carrier that seeks to modify its regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant on a particular route must provide information to demonstrate that it qualifies for non-dominant classification under section 63.10 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10. Petitioners allege that PCCW Enterprises is the ultimate successor-in-interest to the Section 214
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-189A1.txt
  • 22167, para. 59. According to the application, Genuity Telecom Inc. has a less than 5 percent investment share in the Americas-II cable system. Grant of Authority Genuity Telecom Inc., Debtor-in-Possession SCL-MOD-20021219-00107P CORRECTIONS ITC-MOD-20020829-00511 PCCW Enterprises Limited The grant of this modification issued by Public Notice DA 03-56, released January 9, 2003, is corrected to read as follows: Pursuant to Section 63.13 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 63.13, the Chief, Policy Division, grants the above-referenced petition for the reclassification as a non-dominant carrier on sixteen routes filed by PCCW Enterprises Limited and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, PCCW Pacific (US) Inc. and Beyond the Network, Inc. [hereinafter the PCCW companies]. Specifically, the PCCW companies seek to modify their status to non-dominant between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.txt
  • U.S. affiliates as non-dominant on the route for which the foreign carrier was listed. Because the Applicants' failure to make such a demonstration is by itself fatal to their petition, we need not evaluate whether Telecom Argentina lacks market power in any of the other markets necessary for the termination of U.S. international services (e.g., the international transport market). Section 63.13 of the Commission's rules requires a U.S. carrier that seeks to modify its regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant on a particular route to provide information to demonstrate that it qualifies for non-dominant classification pursuant to Section 63.10 of the Commission's Rules. Under 63.10 (a)(3), a carrier seeking such relief bears the burden of submitting information to the Commission sufficient
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1998A1.txt
  • Inc., a Washington corporation, merged into OneEighty Communications, Inc., a Montana corporation. One Eighty Communications, Inc. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: OneEighty Communications, Inc. One Eighty Communications, Inc. Assignment Page 1 of 6 CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC ITC-MOD-20040413-00194P Date of Action: 06/30/2004 Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Belgium route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular Wireless LLC, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Belgacom S.A., a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Belgium. Grant of Authority Modification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2251A1.txt
  • indirect subsidiaries of AT&T Corp. Vista International Communications, Inc. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: ACC National Long Distance Corp Vista International Communications, Inc. Assignment Page 4 of 8 Stratos Communications, Inc. ITC-MOD-20040624-00241P Date of Action: 07/21/2004 Stratos Communications, Inc., Stratos Mobile Networks, Inc., Stratos Offshore Services Company, and Stratos Telecom, Inc. (collectively the "Stratos Licensees"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Stratos Licensees as non-dominant international carriers on the U.S.-Canada route. The Stratos Licensees' filing states that Aliant, Inc., relinquished its indirect control of Stratos Global Corporation and its indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Stratos Licensees. Until December 10, 2003, Stratos Global Corporation was 53 percent owned by Aliant, Inc., which in turn was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2552A1.txt
  • earlier pro forma assignment of the international section 214 authorization (ITC-214-20020402-00156) held by MobileTel, Inc. to MobileTel, L.L.C, effective August 2002. MobileTel, LLC Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: SJI, LLC MobileTel, LLC Assignment CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC ITC-MOD-20040712-00289P Date of Action: 08/18/2004 Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Denmark and U.S.-South Africa routes. The Cingular filing states the SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular Wireless LLC, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S and Telkom South Africa Ltd., foreign carriers presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2909A1.txt
  • Applicant to the Commission, we reinstate dominant carrier status for the Cingular companies on the U.S.-South Africa route and revise our Grant of Authority set forth in the Public Notice to delete reference to the U.S.-South Africa route to read as follows: Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Denmark route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S, a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Denmark. ITC-MOD-20040712-00290 GSM CORRIDOR, LLC Page 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3255A1.txt
  • 27, 2004. Both parties are indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Cingular Wireless LLC. Cingluar Interactive L.P. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: MACHINE LICENSE HOLDING, LLC Cingular Interactive L.P. Assignment Cingular Interactive L.P. ITC-MOD-20040827-00358P Date of Action: 10/13/2004 SBC Long Distance, Inc., SBC Global Communications, Inc., SNET America, Inc., and SNET Diversified Group, Inc. (collectively "SBC LD"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify SBC LD as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.- Denmark route. The SBC LD filing states that its ultimate parent, SBC Communications Inc., recently divested the majority of its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S, a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Denmark. Specifically, on June 15, 2004, SBC Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-192A1.txt
  • provide facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate Bantacom Corporation ITC-MOD-20041129-00487P Date of Action: 01/26/2005 SBC Long Distance, Inc., SBC Global Communications, Inc., SNET America, Inc., and SNET Diversified Group, Inc. (collectively "SBC LD"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify SBC LD as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.- South Africa route. The SBC LD filing states that its ultimate parent, SBC Communications Inc., recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Telkom SA Limited ("Telkom"), a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in South Africa. Specifically, on November 15, 2004, SBC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3129A1.txt
  • of Action: 11/28/2005 Service(s): Application for authority to provide facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate Vocalglobe Networks, Inc. Page 2 of 7 ITC-MOD-20050802-00430P Date of Action: 11/30/2005 Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (MSV), requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify MSV as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-Canada route. In November 2001, MSV was classified as dominant on the U.S.-Canada route because it was more than 25 percent owned by TMI Communications and Company, LP (TMI), which in turn was directly owned by BCE, Inc. (BCE), which owns or is affiliated with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-372A1.txt
  • 214 authority granted in File No. ITC-214-20010503-00274. This authorization is without prejudice to the Commission's action on any other related pending application(s). Public Service Cellular, Inc. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Public Service Cellular, Inc. Assignment ALLTEL Communications, Inc. ITC-MOD-20041221-00498P Date of Action: 02/09/2005 Cingular Wireless LLC and its affiliates (collectively "Cingular"), requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify Cingular as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-South Africa route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc. ("SBC"), one of Cingular's two ultimate parent companies holding a negative controlling interest in Cingular, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Telkom SA Limited ("Telkom"), a foreign carrier presumed to have market power
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1373A1.txt
  • Service, Global or Limited Global Resale Service Date of Action: 03/16/2007 Service(s): Application for authority to provide facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate Transtelco, Inc. ITC-MOD-20061016-00567P Date of Action: 03/21/2007 TELUS Corporation (TELUS) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TELUS as a non-dominant carrier on the following three routes: (1) U.S.-Dominican Republic, (2) U.S.-Gibraltar, and (3) U.S.-Venezuela. (See ITC-214-20030718-00362, granted DA 03-2650, rel. Aug 14, 2003.) According to the filing, TELUS is classified as dominant on these routes under section 63.10 of the rules because, at the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2725A1.txt
  • facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate Custom Tel, LLC Page 1 of 6 ITC-MOD-20070212-00192 P Date of Action: 06/20/2007 Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) and its affiliates listed below (collectively "Verizon and its affilates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Dominican Republic route. According to the filing, Verizon and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the rules because they were affiliated with Verizon Dominica C. por A (Verizon Dominca, formerly know as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2984A1.txt
  • Inc. Transfer of Control Global Communications Solutions, Inc. CORRECTIONS ITC-MOD-20070319-00191 Cellco Partnership The grant of ITC-MOD-20070319-00191, DA 07-2725 (rel. June 21, 2007), is corrected to read as follows: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and its affiliates, GTE Railfone LLC, Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP, Upstate Cellular Network, and Cal-One LP (collectively "Verizon Wireless and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon Wireless and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Dominican Republic route. According to the filing, Verizon Wireless and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the rules because they were affiliated with Verizon Dominica C. por A (Verizon Dominca, formerly
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3905A1.txt
  • for authority to provide facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate US Telesis, Inc. ITC-MOD-20070514-00322 P Date of Action: 09/12/2007 Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) and its affiliates listed below (collectively "Verizon and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Gibraltar route. According to the filing, Verizon and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with Gibtelecom Limited, a foreign carrier presumed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4569A1.txt
  • with section 63.18(e)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.18(e)(1), (2). Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate AG VoIP Solutions, LLC ITC-MOD-20070828-00362 P Date of Action: 11/07/2007 Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and its affiliates, GTE Railfone LLC, Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP, Upstate Cellular Network, and Cal-One LP (collectively "Verizon Wireless and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon Wireless and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Gibraltar and U.S.-Venezuela routes. According to the filing, Verizon Wireless and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the U.S.-Gibraltar route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with Gibtelecom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • (202) 418-0214 or send an email to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven VanRoekel Managing Director (b) Display 3060-0674 Sec. 76.1618 08/31/11 3060-0678 Part 25 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Licensing of, and Spectrum Usage by, Satellite Network Stations and Space Stations 09/30/13 3060-0681 Secs. 52.103 and 52.105 09/30/12 3060-0685 FCC 1210 and FCC 1240 01/31/12 3060-0686 Secs. 63.10, 63.11, 63.13, 63.18, 63.19, 63.21, 63.24, 63.25 and 1.1311, International Section 214 Process and Tariff Requirements 03/31/12 3060-0687 Access to Telecommunications Equipment and Services by Persons with Disabilities, CC Docket No. 87-124 06/30/12 3060-0688 FCC 1235 08/31/13 3060-0690 Sec. 101.17 06/30/12 3060-0691 Sec. 90.665 07/31/13 3060-0692 Secs. 76.613, 76.802, and 76.804 02/28/13 3060-0695 Sec. 87.219 11/30/11 3060-0698 Secs. 23.20, 25.203, and 73.1030,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-313A1.txt
  • Piedmont Communications Services, Inc ITC-MOD-20091027-00557 P Date of Action: 02/18/2010 Global Crossing Limited (GCL) on behalf of its subsidiaries - Budget Call Long Distance, Inc.; Global Crossing Americas Solutions, Inc.; Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc.; Global Crossing North American Networks, Inc.; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc; International Optical Network, L.L.C.; and Racal Telecommunications Inc. (collectively, "GCL affiliates") - requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify the GCL subsidiaries as non-dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route. The GCL subsidiaries were classified as dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with PT Indonesian Satellite Corporation (PT Indosat), a foreign carrier presumed to have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-313A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Piedmont Communications Services, Inc ITC-MOD-20091027-00557 P Date of Action: 02/18/2010 Global Crossing Limited (GCL) on behalf of its subsidiaries - Budget Call Long Distance, Inc.; Global Crossing Americas Solutions, Inc.; Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc.; Global Crossing North American Networks, Inc.; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc; International Optical Network, L.L.C.; and Racal Telecommunications Inc. (collectively, "GCL affiliates") - requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify the GCL subsidiaries as non-dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route. The GCL subsidiaries were classified as dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with PT Indonesian Satellite Corporation (PT Indosat), a foreign carrier presumed to have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-88A1.txt
  • was, and WBI continues to be, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Clinton County Telephone Company, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Lakes Comnet, Inc. Westphalia Communications Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: Westphalia Broadband, Inc. Westphalia Communications Assignment Westphalia Broadband, Inc. ITC-MOD-20111024-00322 E Date of Action: 01/23/2012 Telecom Italia Sparkle of North America, Inc. (TISNA) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TISNA as a non-dominant carrier on the U.S-Austria, U.S.-Bolivia, U.S-Brazil and U.S.-Cuba routes. TISNA is classified as dominant on the U.S.-Austria route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because it was affiliated with Telekom Austria A.G., a foreign carrier presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-88A1_Rcd.pdf
  • was, and WBI continues to be, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Clinton County Telephone Company, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Lakes Comnet, Inc. Westphalia Communications Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: Westphalia Broadband, Inc. Westphalia Communications Assignment Westphalia Broadband, Inc. ITC-MOD-20111024-00322 E Date of Action: 01/23/2012 Telecom Italia Sparkle of North America, Inc. (TISNA) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TISNA as a non-dominant carrier on the U.S-Austria, U.S.-Bolivia, U.S-Brazil and U.S.-Cuba routes. TISNA is classified as dominant on the U.S.-Austria route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because it was affiliated with Telekom Austria A.G., a foreign carrier presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-2352A1.txt
  • DA 95-2352 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of TELEFONICA LARGA DISTANCIA DE PUERTO RICO, INC. File No. ISP-95-001-ND Application for modification of regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant for international communications services with Columbia MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND AUTHORIZATION Adopted: October 31,1995; Released: November 27,1995 By the Chief, Telecommunications Division: 1. Pursuant to Section 63.13(a)(l) of the Commission's Rules, Telefonica Larga Distancia de Puerto Rico, Inc. ("TLD") has filed the above-captioned application for modification of its regulatory status from dominant to non- dominant for the provision of international communica tions services with Columbia. This application was placed on public notice and comments were filed by Telepuerto San Isidro. S.A. d/b/a ("TRICOM"). to which TLD filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206198A1.txt
  • listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ISP-PDR-20000913-00029 SOUTHWESTERN BELL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc. (SBCS), and named subsidiaries and affiliates of SBCS [hereinafter the SBC companies] request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the SBCS companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Hungary route. The SBCS filing states that Ameritech Corporation, an affiliate of the SBCS companies, recently divested its interest in MATAV Rt., the incumbent telecommunications carrier in Hungary. Interested parties may file comments by October13, 2000 and reply comments by October 20, 2000. REMINDER:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213310A1.txt
  • Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ISP-PDR-20010507-00028 CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Cable & Wireless USA, Inc., pursuant to Section 63.13 of the Commission's Rules, requests modification of dominant to non-dominant regulatory status for the provision of international services on the routes between the United States and the Philippines, Thailand, Tonga, and Hong Kong. Interested parties may file comments by June 15, 2001 and reply comments by June 22, 2001. . REMINDER: Applicants must certify that neither the applicant nor any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247623A1.txt
  • center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC ITC-MOD-20040413-00194P Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Belgium route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular Wireless LLC, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Belgacom S.A., a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Belgium. Interested parties may file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248145A1.txt
  • international telecommunications common carriers in IB Docket No. 98-118, Review of International Common Carrier Regulations, FCC 99-51, released March 23, 1999, 64 Fed. Reg. 19,057 (Apr. 19, 1999). An updated version of Section 63.09-.24 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/telecomrules.html. TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc. ITC-MOD-20040527-00218P TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc., requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc. as a nondominant international carrier on the U.S.-Belgium route. The TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc. filing states that TDC A/S Ameritech Luxembourg S.a.r.l., and SBC Communications Inc., the two ultimate parent companies of TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc., recently divested their indirect ownership interest in Belgacom S.A., a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248884A1.txt
  • Common Carrier Regulations, FCC 99-51, released March 23, 1999, 64 Fed. Reg. 19,057 (Apr. 19, 1999). An updated version of Section 63.09-.24 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/telecomrules.html. Stratos Communications, Inc. ITC-MOD-20040624-00241P Stratos Communications, Inc., Stratos Mobile Networks, Inc., Stratos Offshore Services Company, and Stratos Telecom, Inc. (collectively the "Stratos Licensees"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Stratos Licensees as non-dominant international carriers on the U.S.-Canada route. The Stratos Licensees' filing states that Aliant, Inc., relinquished its indirect control of Stratos Global Corporation and its indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Stratos Licensees. Until December 10, 2003, Stratos Global Corporation was 53 percent owned by Aliant, Inc., which in turn was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249955A1.txt
  • center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC ITC-MOD-20040712-00289P Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Denmark and U.S.-South Africa routes. The Cingular filing states the SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular Wireless LLC, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S and Telkom South Africa Ltd., foreign carriers presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251880A1.txt
  • - 4200.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 57.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 64.60 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 78.89 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 65.58 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 67.14 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 60.10 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 61.88 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 63.13 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 54.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 72.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 80.10 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7D Page 11 of 13 78.10 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D DIGITAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252236A1.txt
  • 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. SBC Long Distance, Inc. ITC-MOD-20040827-00358P SBC Long Distance, Inc., SBC Global Communications, Inc., SNET America, Inc., and SNET Diversified Group, Inc. (collectively "SBC LD"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify SBC LD as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.- Denmark route. The SBC LD filing states that its ultimate parent, SBC Communications Inc., recently divested the majority of its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S, a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Denmark. Specifically, on June 15, 2004, SBC Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253064A1.txt
  • 57.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 64.60 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 78.89 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 65.58 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D Page 2 of 10 67.14 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 60.10 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 61.88 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 63.13 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 54.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 72.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 80.10 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 78.10 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 69.39 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 178KG7D DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255718A1.txt
  • be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ITC-MOD-20041129-00487P SBC Long Distance, Inc., SBC Global Communications, Inc., SNET America, Inc., and SNET Diversified Group, Inc. (collectively "SBC LD"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify SBC LD as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.- South Africa route. The SBC LD filing states that its ultimate parent, SBC Communications Inc., recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Telkom SA Limited ("Telkom"), a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in South Africa. Specifically, on November 15, 2004, SBC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256088A1.txt
  • party to the application is subject to a denial of federal benefits by federal and/or state courts under authority granted in 21 U.S.C. § 862. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.2001­.2003. An updated version of Section 63.09-.25 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html ITC-MOD-20041221-00498P Cingular Wireless LLC and its affiliates (collectively "Cingular"), requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify Cingular as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-South Africa route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc. ("SBC"), one of Cingular's two ultimate parent companies holding a negative controlling interest in Cingular, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Telkom SA Limited ("Telkom"), a foreign carrier presumed to have market power
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261870A1.txt
  • Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ITC-MOD-20050802-00430P Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (MSV), requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify MSV as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-Canada route. In November 2001, MSV was classified as dominant on the U.S.-Canada route because it was more than 25 percent owned by TMI Communications and Company, LP (TMI), which in turn was directly owned by BCE, Inc. (BCE), which owns or is affiliated with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • MARIANA ISLANDS Total -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 653700 C MICRONESIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 OHIO Total -0.32 -3.37 3.16 6.17 300585 A ARCADIA TEL. CO. 11.82 -2.17 14.30 74.60 300586 A THE ARTHUR MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.60 -1.82 13.67 198.93 300588 A AYERSVILLE TEL. CO. 12.78 -0.75 13.63 109.23 300589 A BASCOM MUTUAL TEL. CO. 12.21 -1.96 14.45 63.13 300590 A BENTON RIDGE TEL. CO. 7.44 -0.63 8.12 19.42 300591 A BUCKLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.28 -0.68 14.05 72.12 300594 A THE CHAMPAIGN TEL. CO. 2.25 -2.37 4.73 0.00 300597 C CHILLICOTHE TEL. CO. 0.24 -1.09 1.34 -4.35 300598 C MCCLURE TEL. CO. -7.18 -2.73 -4.57 -13.71 300604 A COLUMBUS GROVE TEL. CO. 8.39 -4.67 13.69 INFINITE 300606 C CONNEAUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • MARIANA ISLANDS Total -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 653700 C MICRONESIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 OHIO Total -0.32 -3.37 3.16 6.17 300585 A ARCADIA TEL. CO. 11.82 -2.17 14.30 74.60 300586 A THE ARTHUR MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.60 -1.82 13.67 198.93 300588 A AYERSVILLE TEL. CO. 12.78 -0.75 13.63 109.23 300589 A BASCOM MUTUAL TEL. CO. 12.21 -1.96 14.45 63.13 300590 A BENTON RIDGE TEL. CO. 7.44 -0.63 8.12 19.42 300591 A BUCKLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.28 -0.68 14.05 72.12 300594 A THE CHAMPAIGN TEL. CO. 2.25 -2.37 4.73 0.00 300597 C CHILLICOTHE TEL. CO. 0.24 -1.09 1.34 -4.35 300598 C MCCLURE TEL. CO. -7.18 -2.73 -4.57 -13.71 300604 A COLUMBUS GROVE TEL. CO. 8.39 -4.67 13.69 INFINITE 300606 C CONNEAUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270413A1.txt
  • files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ITC-MOD-20061016-00567P TELUS Corporation (TELUS) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TELUS as a non-dominant carrier on the following three routes: (1) U.S.-Dominican Republic, (2) U.S.-Gibraltar, and (3) U.S.-Venezuela. (See ITC-214-20030718-00362, granted DA 03-2650, rel. Aug 14, 2003.) According to the filing, TELUS is classified as dominant on these routes under section 63.10 of the rules because, at the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273109A1.txt
  • to a denial of federal benefits by federal and/or state courts under authority granted in 21 U.S.C. § 862. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.2001­.2003. An updated version of Section 63.09-.25 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html ITC-MOD-20070212-00192P Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) and its affiliates listed below (collectively "Verizon and its affilates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Dominican Republic route. According to the filing, Verizon and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the rules because they were affiliated with Verizon Dominica C. por A (Verizon Dominca, formerly know as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276021A1.txt
  • a denial of federal benefits by federal and/or state courts under authority granted in 21 U.S.C. § 862. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.2001­.2003. An updated version of Section 63.09-.25 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html ITC-MOD-20070514-00322 P Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) and its affiliates listed below (collectively "Verizon and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Gibraltar route. According to the filing, Verizon and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with Gibtelecom Limited, a foreign carrier presumed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276651A1.txt
  • the indirect foreign ownership of Digicel in excess of the 25 percent benchmark in section 310(b)(4) of the Act. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Digicel (USVI), LLC ITC-MOD-20070828-00362 P Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and its affiliates, GTE Railfone LLC, Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP, Upstate Cellular Network, and Cal-One LP (collectively "Verizon Wireless and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon Wireless and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Gibraltar and U.S.-Venezuela routes. According to the filing, Verizon Wireless and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the U.S.-Gibraltar route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with Gibtelecom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277215A1.txt
  • meters ANTENNA ID: 920CS 57.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 64.60 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 76.89 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 65.58 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 67.14 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 60.10 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 61.88 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 63.13 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 54.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D Page 6 of 26 72.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 80.10 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 78.10 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 69.39 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 178KG7D
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295567A1.txt
  • § 63.18(e)(2). International Telecommunications Certificate Alrus Telecom Inc. ITC-MOD-20091027-00557 P Global Crossing Limited (GCL) on behalf of its subsidiaries - Budget Call Long Distance, Inc.; Global Crossing Americas Solutions, Inc.; Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc.; Global Crossing North American Networks, Inc.; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc; International Optical Network, L.L.C.; and Racal Telecommunications Inc. (collectively, "GCL affiliates") - requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify the GCL subsidiaries as non-dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route. The GCL subsidiaries were classified as dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with PT Indonesian Satellite Corporation (PT Indosat), a foreign carrier presumed to have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311670A1.txt
  • (1997), Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 18158 (2000), the indirect foreign ownership of SmartCall and iSmart in excess of the 25 percent benchmark in section 310(b)(4) of the Act is consistent with the public interest. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Software Cellular Network (North America) ltd ITC-MOD-20111024-00322 E Telecom Italia Sparkle of North America, Inc. (TISNA) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TISNA as a non-dominant carrier on the U.S-Austria, U.S.-Bolivia, U.S-Brazil and U.S.-Cuba routes. TISNA is classified as dominant on the U.S.-Austria route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because it was affiliated with Telekom Austria A.G., a foreign carrier presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.txt
  • radio and aeronautical radio applicants and licensees to request authority before accepting indirect foreign ownership in excess of the 25% benchmark of Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; and by international common carriers to request a change in regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant for a particular route. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); 47 C.F.R.§1.2 47 C.F.R.§63.13 International Special Project (ISP) -Amendments ISP-AMD Amendment of an ISP-PDR to correct information required for the processing of the original Petition for Declaratory Ruling. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); 47 C.F.R.§1.2 47 C.F.R.§63.13. International Special Project ISP -- Other Filings TBD Request to waive the Commission's rules for international common carriers (other than waiver of the international settlements policy). §1.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.txt
  • common carrier radio and aeronautical radio applicants and licensees to request authority before accepting indirect foreign ownership in excess of the 25% benchmark of Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; and by international common carriers to request a change in regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant for a particular route. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); §1.2; §63.13 International Special Project (ISP) -Amendments ISP-AMD Amendment of an ISP-PDR to correct information required for the processing of the original Petition for Declaratory Ruling. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); §1.2; §63.13. International Special Project ISP -- Other Filings TBD Request to waive the Commission's rules for international common carriers (other than waiver of the international settlements policy). §1.3 DATA NETWORK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1_Erratum.doc
  • common carrier radio and aeronautical radio applicants and licensees to request authority before accepting indirect foreign ownership in excess of the 25% benchmark of Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; and by international common carriers to request a change in regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant for a particular route. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); §1.2; §63.13 International Special Project (ISP) -Amendments ISP-AMD Amendment of an ISP-PDR to correct information required for the processing of the original Petition for Declaratory Ruling. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); §1.2; §63.13. International Special Project ISP -- Other Filings TBD Request to waive the Commission's rules for international common carriers (other than waiver of the international settlements policy). §1.3 DATA NETWORK
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities - Continued (As of October 15) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 20002001 State City New Jersey Phillipsburg 44.94 44.94 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.89 44.89 44.89 44.89 42.35 42.35 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 30.00 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 57.13 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 58.17 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 57.33 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 58.32 New York Ogdensburg 64.61
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 44.52 44.89 44.89 44.89 44.89 42.35 44.89 44.89 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 31.99 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 61.53 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 62.57 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 61.18 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 62.47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 30.52 30.52 30.52 36.03 36.03 New Jersey Phillipsburg 44.94 44.94 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.89 44.89 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 9 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities * (as of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 New York Ogdensburg 64.61 65.12 64.46 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 New York Rochester 35.30 37.54 38.91 47.01 33.32 33.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 36.03 36.03 New Jersey Phillipsburg 44.94 44.94 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.89 44.89 44.89 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 9 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities * (as of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 New York Ogdensburg 64.61 65.12 64.46 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 New York Rochester 35.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html
  • SERVICE BY COMMON CARRIERS; AND GRANTS OF RECOGNIZED PRIVATE OPERATING AGENCY STATUS [45] 63.09 Definitions applicable to international Section 214 authorizations. [46] [47]63.10 Regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers. [48] 63.11 Notification by and prior approval for U.S. international carriers that are or propose to become affiliated with a foreign carrier. [49] 63.12 Processing of international Section 214 applications. [50] 63.13 Procedures for modifying regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers from dominant to non-dominant. [51] 63.14 Prohibition on agreeing to accept special concessions. [52] 63.15 [removed] (see Section 63.23) [53] 63.16 [removed] [54] 63.17 Special provisions for U.S. international common carriers. [55] 63.18 Contents of applications for international common carriers. [56] 63.19 Special procedures for discontinuances of international services. [57] 63.20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1383A1.txt
  • Review - Reform of the International Settlements Policy and Associated Filing Requirements, FCC 99-73, released May 6, 1999, 64 Fed. Reg. 34, 734 (June 29, 1999). An updated version of Sections 63.09­.24 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/telecomrules.html. ISP-PDR-20000913-00029 SOUTHWESTERN BELL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Date of Action: 06/06/2001 Pursuant to Section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 63.13, the Chief, Telecommunications Division, grants the above-referenced petition for reclassification as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-Hungary route filed by Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc. (SBCS) and named subsidiaries and affiliates of SBCS [hereinafter the SBC companies]. The petition states that Ameritech Corporation, an affiliate of the SBCS companies, has divested
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1473A1.txt
  • International Settlements Policy and Associated Filing Requirements, FCC 99-73, released May 6, 1999, 64 Fed. Reg. 34, 734 (June 29, 1999). An updated version of Sections 63.09­.24 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/telecomrules.html. ISP-PDR-20010507-00028 CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Date of Action: 06/20/2001 Cable & Wireless USA, Inc., pursuant to Section 63.13 of the Commission's Rules, requests modification of dominant to non-dominant regulatory status for the provision of international services on the routes between the United States and the Philippines, Thailand, Tonga, and Hong Kong. Grant of Authority Page 1 of 5 INFORMATIVE ITC-214-19991122-00728 PCCW PACIFIC LTD. Pursuant to Section 63.21(i) of the Commission's Rules, PCCW Enterprises Limited hereby notifies the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.txt
  • rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. For further information, contact David Strickland, International Bureau, at (202) 418-0977. - FCC - List of Foreign Telecommunications Carriers that are Presumed to Possess Market Power in Foreign Telecommunications Markets, Public Notice, DA 99-809 (correction rel. June 18, 1999), at http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da990809.tx t. Pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, a carrier that seeks to modify its regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant on a particular route must provide information to demonstrate that it qualifies for non-dominant classification under to section 63.10 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10. See 47 C.F.R. 63.10(a)(3). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.txt
  • § 1.1205(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. For further information, contact David Strickland, International Bureau, at (202) 418-0977. List of Foreign Telecommunications Carriers that are Presumed to Possess Market Power in Foreign Telecommunications Markets, Public Notice, DA 99-809 (correction rel. June 18, 1999), at http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da990809.tx t. Pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, a carrier that seeks to modify its regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant on a particular route must provide information to demonstrate that it qualifies for non-dominant classification under to section 63.10 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10. See 47 C.F.R. 63.10(a)(3). Petitioners allege that Brasil Telecom cannot offer inter-regional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.txt
  • not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1205(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. For further information, contact David Strickland, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1460. Pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, a carrier that seeks to modify its regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant on a particular route must provide information to demonstrate that it qualifies for non-dominant classification under section 63.10 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10. Petitioners allege that PCCW Enterprises is the ultimate successor-in-interest to the Section 214
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-189A1.txt
  • 22167, para. 59. According to the application, Genuity Telecom Inc. has a less than 5 percent investment share in the Americas-II cable system. Grant of Authority Genuity Telecom Inc., Debtor-in-Possession SCL-MOD-20021219-00107P CORRECTIONS ITC-MOD-20020829-00511 PCCW Enterprises Limited The grant of this modification issued by Public Notice DA 03-56, released January 9, 2003, is corrected to read as follows: Pursuant to Section 63.13 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 63.13, the Chief, Policy Division, grants the above-referenced petition for the reclassification as a non-dominant carrier on sixteen routes filed by PCCW Enterprises Limited and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, PCCW Pacific (US) Inc. and Beyond the Network, Inc. [hereinafter the PCCW companies]. Specifically, the PCCW companies seek to modify their status to non-dominant between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.txt
  • U.S. affiliates as non-dominant on the route for which the foreign carrier was listed. Because the Applicants' failure to make such a demonstration is by itself fatal to their petition, we need not evaluate whether Telecom Argentina lacks market power in any of the other markets necessary for the termination of U.S. international services (e.g., the international transport market). Section 63.13 of the Commission's rules requires a U.S. carrier that seeks to modify its regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant on a particular route to provide information to demonstrate that it qualifies for non-dominant classification pursuant to Section 63.10 of the Commission's Rules. Under 63.10 (a)(3), a carrier seeking such relief bears the burden of submitting information to the Commission sufficient
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1998A1.txt
  • Inc., a Washington corporation, merged into OneEighty Communications, Inc., a Montana corporation. One Eighty Communications, Inc. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: OneEighty Communications, Inc. One Eighty Communications, Inc. Assignment Page 1 of 6 CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC ITC-MOD-20040413-00194P Date of Action: 06/30/2004 Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Belgium route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular Wireless LLC, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Belgacom S.A., a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Belgium. Grant of Authority Modification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2251A1.txt
  • indirect subsidiaries of AT&T Corp. Vista International Communications, Inc. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: ACC National Long Distance Corp Vista International Communications, Inc. Assignment Page 4 of 8 Stratos Communications, Inc. ITC-MOD-20040624-00241P Date of Action: 07/21/2004 Stratos Communications, Inc., Stratos Mobile Networks, Inc., Stratos Offshore Services Company, and Stratos Telecom, Inc. (collectively the "Stratos Licensees"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Stratos Licensees as non-dominant international carriers on the U.S.-Canada route. The Stratos Licensees' filing states that Aliant, Inc., relinquished its indirect control of Stratos Global Corporation and its indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Stratos Licensees. Until December 10, 2003, Stratos Global Corporation was 53 percent owned by Aliant, Inc., which in turn was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2552A1.txt
  • earlier pro forma assignment of the international section 214 authorization (ITC-214-20020402-00156) held by MobileTel, Inc. to MobileTel, L.L.C, effective August 2002. MobileTel, LLC Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: SJI, LLC MobileTel, LLC Assignment CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC ITC-MOD-20040712-00289P Date of Action: 08/18/2004 Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Denmark and U.S.-South Africa routes. The Cingular filing states the SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular Wireless LLC, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S and Telkom South Africa Ltd., foreign carriers presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2909A1.txt
  • Applicant to the Commission, we reinstate dominant carrier status for the Cingular companies on the U.S.-South Africa route and revise our Grant of Authority set forth in the Public Notice to delete reference to the U.S.-South Africa route to read as follows: Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Denmark route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S, a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Denmark. ITC-MOD-20040712-00290 GSM CORRIDOR, LLC Page 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3255A1.txt
  • 27, 2004. Both parties are indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Cingular Wireless LLC. Cingluar Interactive L.P. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: MACHINE LICENSE HOLDING, LLC Cingular Interactive L.P. Assignment Cingular Interactive L.P. ITC-MOD-20040827-00358P Date of Action: 10/13/2004 SBC Long Distance, Inc., SBC Global Communications, Inc., SNET America, Inc., and SNET Diversified Group, Inc. (collectively "SBC LD"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify SBC LD as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.- Denmark route. The SBC LD filing states that its ultimate parent, SBC Communications Inc., recently divested the majority of its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S, a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Denmark. Specifically, on June 15, 2004, SBC Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-192A1.txt
  • provide facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate Bantacom Corporation ITC-MOD-20041129-00487P Date of Action: 01/26/2005 SBC Long Distance, Inc., SBC Global Communications, Inc., SNET America, Inc., and SNET Diversified Group, Inc. (collectively "SBC LD"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify SBC LD as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.- South Africa route. The SBC LD filing states that its ultimate parent, SBC Communications Inc., recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Telkom SA Limited ("Telkom"), a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in South Africa. Specifically, on November 15, 2004, SBC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3129A1.txt
  • of Action: 11/28/2005 Service(s): Application for authority to provide facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate Vocalglobe Networks, Inc. Page 2 of 7 ITC-MOD-20050802-00430P Date of Action: 11/30/2005 Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (MSV), requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify MSV as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-Canada route. In November 2001, MSV was classified as dominant on the U.S.-Canada route because it was more than 25 percent owned by TMI Communications and Company, LP (TMI), which in turn was directly owned by BCE, Inc. (BCE), which owns or is affiliated with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-372A1.txt
  • 214 authority granted in File No. ITC-214-20010503-00274. This authorization is without prejudice to the Commission's action on any other related pending application(s). Public Service Cellular, Inc. Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Public Service Cellular, Inc. Assignment ALLTEL Communications, Inc. ITC-MOD-20041221-00498P Date of Action: 02/09/2005 Cingular Wireless LLC and its affiliates (collectively "Cingular"), requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify Cingular as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-South Africa route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc. ("SBC"), one of Cingular's two ultimate parent companies holding a negative controlling interest in Cingular, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Telkom SA Limited ("Telkom"), a foreign carrier presumed to have market power
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1373A1.txt
  • Service, Global or Limited Global Resale Service Date of Action: 03/16/2007 Service(s): Application for authority to provide facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate Transtelco, Inc. ITC-MOD-20061016-00567P Date of Action: 03/21/2007 TELUS Corporation (TELUS) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TELUS as a non-dominant carrier on the following three routes: (1) U.S.-Dominican Republic, (2) U.S.-Gibraltar, and (3) U.S.-Venezuela. (See ITC-214-20030718-00362, granted DA 03-2650, rel. Aug 14, 2003.) According to the filing, TELUS is classified as dominant on these routes under section 63.10 of the rules because, at the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2725A1.txt
  • facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate Custom Tel, LLC Page 1 of 6 ITC-MOD-20070212-00192 P Date of Action: 06/20/2007 Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) and its affiliates listed below (collectively "Verizon and its affilates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Dominican Republic route. According to the filing, Verizon and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the rules because they were affiliated with Verizon Dominica C. por A (Verizon Dominca, formerly know as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2984A1.txt
  • Inc. Transfer of Control Global Communications Solutions, Inc. CORRECTIONS ITC-MOD-20070319-00191 Cellco Partnership The grant of ITC-MOD-20070319-00191, DA 07-2725 (rel. June 21, 2007), is corrected to read as follows: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and its affiliates, GTE Railfone LLC, Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP, Upstate Cellular Network, and Cal-One LP (collectively "Verizon Wireless and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon Wireless and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Dominican Republic route. According to the filing, Verizon Wireless and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the rules because they were affiliated with Verizon Dominica C. por A (Verizon Dominca, formerly
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3905A1.txt
  • for authority to provide facilities-based service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules, and also to provide service in accordance with Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate US Telesis, Inc. ITC-MOD-20070514-00322 P Date of Action: 09/12/2007 Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) and its affiliates listed below (collectively "Verizon and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Gibraltar route. According to the filing, Verizon and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with Gibtelecom Limited, a foreign carrier presumed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4569A1.txt
  • with section 63.18(e)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.18(e)(1), (2). Grant of Authority International Telecommunications Certificate AG VoIP Solutions, LLC ITC-MOD-20070828-00362 P Date of Action: 11/07/2007 Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and its affiliates, GTE Railfone LLC, Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP, Upstate Cellular Network, and Cal-One LP (collectively "Verizon Wireless and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon Wireless and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Gibraltar and U.S.-Venezuela routes. According to the filing, Verizon Wireless and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the U.S.-Gibraltar route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with Gibtelecom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • (202) 418-0214 or send an email to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven VanRoekel Managing Director (b) Display 3060-0674 Sec. 76.1618 08/31/11 3060-0678 Part 25 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Licensing of, and Spectrum Usage by, Satellite Network Stations and Space Stations 09/30/13 3060-0681 Secs. 52.103 and 52.105 09/30/12 3060-0685 FCC 1210 and FCC 1240 01/31/12 3060-0686 Secs. 63.10, 63.11, 63.13, 63.18, 63.19, 63.21, 63.24, 63.25 and 1.1311, International Section 214 Process and Tariff Requirements 03/31/12 3060-0687 Access to Telecommunications Equipment and Services by Persons with Disabilities, CC Docket No. 87-124 06/30/12 3060-0688 FCC 1235 08/31/13 3060-0690 Sec. 101.17 06/30/12 3060-0691 Sec. 90.665 07/31/13 3060-0692 Secs. 76.613, 76.802, and 76.804 02/28/13 3060-0695 Sec. 87.219 11/30/11 3060-0698 Secs. 23.20, 25.203, and 73.1030,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-313A1.txt
  • Piedmont Communications Services, Inc ITC-MOD-20091027-00557 P Date of Action: 02/18/2010 Global Crossing Limited (GCL) on behalf of its subsidiaries - Budget Call Long Distance, Inc.; Global Crossing Americas Solutions, Inc.; Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc.; Global Crossing North American Networks, Inc.; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc; International Optical Network, L.L.C.; and Racal Telecommunications Inc. (collectively, "GCL affiliates") - requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify the GCL subsidiaries as non-dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route. The GCL subsidiaries were classified as dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with PT Indonesian Satellite Corporation (PT Indosat), a foreign carrier presumed to have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-313A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Piedmont Communications Services, Inc ITC-MOD-20091027-00557 P Date of Action: 02/18/2010 Global Crossing Limited (GCL) on behalf of its subsidiaries - Budget Call Long Distance, Inc.; Global Crossing Americas Solutions, Inc.; Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc.; Global Crossing North American Networks, Inc.; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc; International Optical Network, L.L.C.; and Racal Telecommunications Inc. (collectively, "GCL affiliates") - requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify the GCL subsidiaries as non-dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route. The GCL subsidiaries were classified as dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with PT Indonesian Satellite Corporation (PT Indosat), a foreign carrier presumed to have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-88A1.txt
  • was, and WBI continues to be, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Clinton County Telephone Company, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Lakes Comnet, Inc. Westphalia Communications Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: Westphalia Broadband, Inc. Westphalia Communications Assignment Westphalia Broadband, Inc. ITC-MOD-20111024-00322 E Date of Action: 01/23/2012 Telecom Italia Sparkle of North America, Inc. (TISNA) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TISNA as a non-dominant carrier on the U.S-Austria, U.S.-Bolivia, U.S-Brazil and U.S.-Cuba routes. TISNA is classified as dominant on the U.S.-Austria route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because it was affiliated with Telekom Austria A.G., a foreign carrier presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-88A1_Rcd.pdf
  • was, and WBI continues to be, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Clinton County Telephone Company, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Lakes Comnet, Inc. Westphalia Communications Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: Westphalia Broadband, Inc. Westphalia Communications Assignment Westphalia Broadband, Inc. ITC-MOD-20111024-00322 E Date of Action: 01/23/2012 Telecom Italia Sparkle of North America, Inc. (TISNA) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TISNA as a non-dominant carrier on the U.S-Austria, U.S.-Bolivia, U.S-Brazil and U.S.-Cuba routes. TISNA is classified as dominant on the U.S.-Austria route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because it was affiliated with Telekom Austria A.G., a foreign carrier presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-2352A1.txt
  • DA 95-2352 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of TELEFONICA LARGA DISTANCIA DE PUERTO RICO, INC. File No. ISP-95-001-ND Application for modification of regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant for international communications services with Columbia MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND AUTHORIZATION Adopted: October 31,1995; Released: November 27,1995 By the Chief, Telecommunications Division: 1. Pursuant to Section 63.13(a)(l) of the Commission's Rules, Telefonica Larga Distancia de Puerto Rico, Inc. ("TLD") has filed the above-captioned application for modification of its regulatory status from dominant to non- dominant for the provision of international communica tions services with Columbia. This application was placed on public notice and comments were filed by Telepuerto San Isidro. S.A. d/b/a ("TRICOM"). to which TLD filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1469A1.txt
  • 29,1996 By the Chief, Telecommunications Division: Released: August 30,1996 1. EDB Mobile, Inc. (DDE Mobile) has filed an application for modification of its regulatory classification from dominant to non-dominant for the provision of international mobile satellite services on all of its authorized routes except Canada. IDE Mobile filed this application pursuant to the Commission's order in International Services and Section 63.13 of the Commission's Rules.1 In its application IDE Mobile certified that it has no affiliation with any foreign carrier on any of the international routes on which it seeks non-dominant status. No oppositions were filed. The application was granted under the streamlined procedures of Section 63.13 on August 17, 1996. This order ratifies that grant 2. In International Services, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206198A1.txt
  • listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ISP-PDR-20000913-00029 SOUTHWESTERN BELL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc. (SBCS), and named subsidiaries and affiliates of SBCS [hereinafter the SBC companies] request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the SBCS companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Hungary route. The SBCS filing states that Ameritech Corporation, an affiliate of the SBCS companies, recently divested its interest in MATAV Rt., the incumbent telecommunications carrier in Hungary. Interested parties may file comments by October13, 2000 and reply comments by October 20, 2000. REMINDER:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213310A1.txt
  • Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ISP-PDR-20010507-00028 CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Cable & Wireless USA, Inc., pursuant to Section 63.13 of the Commission's Rules, requests modification of dominant to non-dominant regulatory status for the provision of international services on the routes between the United States and the Philippines, Thailand, Tonga, and Hong Kong. Interested parties may file comments by June 15, 2001 and reply comments by June 22, 2001. . REMINDER: Applicants must certify that neither the applicant nor any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247623A1.txt
  • center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC ITC-MOD-20040413-00194P Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Belgium route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular Wireless LLC, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Belgacom S.A., a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Belgium. Interested parties may file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248145A1.txt
  • international telecommunications common carriers in IB Docket No. 98-118, Review of International Common Carrier Regulations, FCC 99-51, released March 23, 1999, 64 Fed. Reg. 19,057 (Apr. 19, 1999). An updated version of Section 63.09-.24 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/telecomrules.html. TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc. ITC-MOD-20040527-00218P TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc., requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc. as a nondominant international carrier on the U.S.-Belgium route. The TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc. filing states that TDC A/S Ameritech Luxembourg S.a.r.l., and SBC Communications Inc., the two ultimate parent companies of TDC Carrier Services USA, Inc., recently divested their indirect ownership interest in Belgacom S.A., a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248884A1.txt
  • Common Carrier Regulations, FCC 99-51, released March 23, 1999, 64 Fed. Reg. 19,057 (Apr. 19, 1999). An updated version of Section 63.09-.24 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/telecomrules.html. Stratos Communications, Inc. ITC-MOD-20040624-00241P Stratos Communications, Inc., Stratos Mobile Networks, Inc., Stratos Offshore Services Company, and Stratos Telecom, Inc. (collectively the "Stratos Licensees"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Stratos Licensees as non-dominant international carriers on the U.S.-Canada route. The Stratos Licensees' filing states that Aliant, Inc., relinquished its indirect control of Stratos Global Corporation and its indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Stratos Licensees. Until December 10, 2003, Stratos Global Corporation was 53 percent owned by Aliant, Inc., which in turn was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249955A1.txt
  • center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC ITC-MOD-20040712-00289P Cingular Wireless LLC and named subsidiaries and affiliates of Cingular (hereinafter the Cingular companies) request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify the Cingular companies as nondominant international carriers on the U.S.-Denmark and U.S.-South Africa routes. The Cingular filing states the SBC Communications Inc., one of the two ultimate parent companies of Cingular Wireless LLC, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S and Telkom South Africa Ltd., foreign carriers presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251880A1.txt
  • - 4200.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 57.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 64.60 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 78.89 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 65.58 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 67.14 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 60.10 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 61.88 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 63.13 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 54.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 72.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 80.10 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7D Page 11 of 13 78.10 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7D DIGITAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252236A1.txt
  • 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. SBC Long Distance, Inc. ITC-MOD-20040827-00358P SBC Long Distance, Inc., SBC Global Communications, Inc., SNET America, Inc., and SNET Diversified Group, Inc. (collectively "SBC LD"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify SBC LD as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.- Denmark route. The SBC LD filing states that its ultimate parent, SBC Communications Inc., recently divested the majority of its indirect ownership interest in TDC A/S, a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in Denmark. Specifically, on June 15, 2004, SBC Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253064A1.txt
  • 57.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 64.60 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 78.89 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 65.58 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D Page 2 of 10 67.14 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 60.10 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 61.88 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 63.13 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 54.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D 72.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 80.10 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 78.10 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 69.39 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 178KG7D DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255718A1.txt
  • be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ITC-MOD-20041129-00487P SBC Long Distance, Inc., SBC Global Communications, Inc., SNET America, Inc., and SNET Diversified Group, Inc. (collectively "SBC LD"), request, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify SBC LD as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.- South Africa route. The SBC LD filing states that its ultimate parent, SBC Communications Inc., recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Telkom SA Limited ("Telkom"), a foreign carrier presumed to have market power in South Africa. Specifically, on November 15, 2004, SBC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256088A1.txt
  • party to the application is subject to a denial of federal benefits by federal and/or state courts under authority granted in 21 U.S.C. § 862. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.2001­.2003. An updated version of Section 63.09-.25 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html ITC-MOD-20041221-00498P Cingular Wireless LLC and its affiliates (collectively "Cingular"), requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify Cingular as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-South Africa route. The Cingular filing states that SBC Communications Inc. ("SBC"), one of Cingular's two ultimate parent companies holding a negative controlling interest in Cingular, recently divested its indirect ownership interest in Telkom SA Limited ("Telkom"), a foreign carrier presumed to have market power
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261870A1.txt
  • Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ITC-MOD-20050802-00430P Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (MSV), requests, pursuant to Section 63.13 of the rules, that the Commission reclassify MSV as a non-dominant international carrier on the U.S.-Canada route. In November 2001, MSV was classified as dominant on the U.S.-Canada route because it was more than 25 percent owned by TMI Communications and Company, LP (TMI), which in turn was directly owned by BCE, Inc. (BCE), which owns or is affiliated with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • MARIANA ISLANDS Total -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 653700 C MICRONESIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 OHIO Total -0.32 -3.37 3.16 6.17 300585 A ARCADIA TEL. CO. 11.82 -2.17 14.30 74.60 300586 A THE ARTHUR MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.60 -1.82 13.67 198.93 300588 A AYERSVILLE TEL. CO. 12.78 -0.75 13.63 109.23 300589 A BASCOM MUTUAL TEL. CO. 12.21 -1.96 14.45 63.13 300590 A BENTON RIDGE TEL. CO. 7.44 -0.63 8.12 19.42 300591 A BUCKLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.28 -0.68 14.05 72.12 300594 A THE CHAMPAIGN TEL. CO. 2.25 -2.37 4.73 0.00 300597 C CHILLICOTHE TEL. CO. 0.24 -1.09 1.34 -4.35 300598 C MCCLURE TEL. CO. -7.18 -2.73 -4.57 -13.71 300604 A COLUMBUS GROVE TEL. CO. 8.39 -4.67 13.69 INFINITE 300606 C CONNEAUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • MARIANA ISLANDS Total -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 653700 C MICRONESIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -16.96 8.29 -23.31 0.00 OHIO Total -0.32 -3.37 3.16 6.17 300585 A ARCADIA TEL. CO. 11.82 -2.17 14.30 74.60 300586 A THE ARTHUR MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.60 -1.82 13.67 198.93 300588 A AYERSVILLE TEL. CO. 12.78 -0.75 13.63 109.23 300589 A BASCOM MUTUAL TEL. CO. 12.21 -1.96 14.45 63.13 300590 A BENTON RIDGE TEL. CO. 7.44 -0.63 8.12 19.42 300591 A BUCKLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.28 -0.68 14.05 72.12 300594 A THE CHAMPAIGN TEL. CO. 2.25 -2.37 4.73 0.00 300597 C CHILLICOTHE TEL. CO. 0.24 -1.09 1.34 -4.35 300598 C MCCLURE TEL. CO. -7.18 -2.73 -4.57 -13.71 300604 A COLUMBUS GROVE TEL. CO. 8.39 -4.67 13.69 INFINITE 300606 C CONNEAUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270413A1.txt
  • files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission's rules, regulations, and other requirements. ITC-MOD-20061016-00567P TELUS Corporation (TELUS) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TELUS as a non-dominant carrier on the following three routes: (1) U.S.-Dominican Republic, (2) U.S.-Gibraltar, and (3) U.S.-Venezuela. (See ITC-214-20030718-00362, granted DA 03-2650, rel. Aug 14, 2003.) According to the filing, TELUS is classified as dominant on these routes under section 63.10 of the rules because, at the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273109A1.txt
  • to a denial of federal benefits by federal and/or state courts under authority granted in 21 U.S.C. § 862. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.2001­.2003. An updated version of Section 63.09-.25 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html ITC-MOD-20070212-00192P Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) and its affiliates listed below (collectively "Verizon and its affilates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Dominican Republic route. According to the filing, Verizon and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the rules because they were affiliated with Verizon Dominica C. por A (Verizon Dominca, formerly know as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276021A1.txt
  • a denial of federal benefits by federal and/or state courts under authority granted in 21 U.S.C. § 862. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.2001­.2003. An updated version of Section 63.09-.25 of the rules, and other related sections, is available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html ITC-MOD-20070514-00322 P Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon) and its affiliates listed below (collectively "Verizon and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Gibraltar route. According to the filing, Verizon and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with Gibtelecom Limited, a foreign carrier presumed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276651A1.txt
  • the indirect foreign ownership of Digicel in excess of the 25 percent benchmark in section 310(b)(4) of the Act. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Digicel (USVI), LLC ITC-MOD-20070828-00362 P Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and its affiliates, GTE Railfone LLC, Verizon Wireless Personal Communications LP, Upstate Cellular Network, and Cal-One LP (collectively "Verizon Wireless and its affiliates") request, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify Verizon Wireless and its affiliates as non-dominant carriers on the U.S.-Gibraltar and U.S.-Venezuela routes. According to the filing, Verizon Wireless and its affiliates are classified as dominant on the U.S.-Gibraltar route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with Gibtelecom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277215A1.txt
  • meters ANTENNA ID: 920CS 57.08 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 178KG7D 64.60 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M00G7D 76.89 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 27M0G7D 65.58 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M00G7D 67.14 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 2M86G7D 60.10 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 358KG7D 61.88 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 538KG7D 63.13 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 717KG7D 54.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 90K0G7D Page 6 of 26 72.12 dBW DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 9M00G7D 80.10 dBW ANALOG VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F3F 78.10 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7F 69.39 dBW DIGITAL VIDEO 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M80G7F DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 178KG7D
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295567A1.txt
  • § 63.18(e)(2). International Telecommunications Certificate Alrus Telecom Inc. ITC-MOD-20091027-00557 P Global Crossing Limited (GCL) on behalf of its subsidiaries - Budget Call Long Distance, Inc.; Global Crossing Americas Solutions, Inc.; Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc.; Global Crossing North American Networks, Inc.; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc; International Optical Network, L.L.C.; and Racal Telecommunications Inc. (collectively, "GCL affiliates") - requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify the GCL subsidiaries as non-dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route. The GCL subsidiaries were classified as dominant on the U.S.-Indonesia route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because they were affiliated with PT Indonesian Satellite Corporation (PT Indosat), a foreign carrier presumed to have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311670A1.txt
  • (1997), Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 18158 (2000), the indirect foreign ownership of SmartCall and iSmart in excess of the 25 percent benchmark in section 310(b)(4) of the Act is consistent with the public interest. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Software Cellular Network (North America) ltd ITC-MOD-20111024-00322 E Telecom Italia Sparkle of North America, Inc. (TISNA) requests, pursuant to section 63.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.13, that the Commission reclassify TISNA as a non-dominant carrier on the U.S-Austria, U.S.-Bolivia, U.S-Brazil and U.S.-Cuba routes. TISNA is classified as dominant on the U.S.-Austria route under section 63.10 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.10, because it was affiliated with Telekom Austria A.G., a foreign carrier presumed to have market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.txt
  • radio and aeronautical radio applicants and licensees to request authority before accepting indirect foreign ownership in excess of the 25% benchmark of Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; and by international common carriers to request a change in regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant for a particular route. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); 47 C.F.R.§1.2 47 C.F.R.§63.13 International Special Project (ISP) -Amendments ISP-AMD Amendment of an ISP-PDR to correct information required for the processing of the original Petition for Declaratory Ruling. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); 47 C.F.R.§1.2 47 C.F.R.§63.13. International Special Project ISP -- Other Filings TBD Request to waive the Commission's rules for international common carriers (other than waiver of the international settlements policy). §1.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.txt
  • common carrier radio and aeronautical radio applicants and licensees to request authority before accepting indirect foreign ownership in excess of the 25% benchmark of Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; and by international common carriers to request a change in regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant for a particular route. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); §1.2; §63.13 International Special Project (ISP) -Amendments ISP-AMD Amendment of an ISP-PDR to correct information required for the processing of the original Petition for Declaratory Ruling. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); §1.2; §63.13. International Special Project ISP -- Other Filings TBD Request to waive the Commission's rules for international common carriers (other than waiver of the international settlements policy). §1.3 DATA NETWORK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1_Erratum.doc
  • common carrier radio and aeronautical radio applicants and licensees to request authority before accepting indirect foreign ownership in excess of the 25% benchmark of Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; and by international common carriers to request a change in regulatory status from dominant to non-dominant for a particular route. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); §1.2; §63.13 International Special Project (ISP) -Amendments ISP-AMD Amendment of an ISP-PDR to correct information required for the processing of the original Petition for Declaratory Ruling. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.§ 310(b)(4); §1.2; §63.13. International Special Project ISP -- Other Filings TBD Request to waive the Commission's rules for international common carriers (other than waiver of the international settlements policy). §1.3 DATA NETWORK
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities - Continued (As of October 15) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 20002001 State City New Jersey Phillipsburg 44.94 44.94 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.89 44.89 44.89 44.89 42.35 42.35 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 30.00 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 57.13 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 58.17 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 57.33 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 58.32 New York Ogdensburg 64.61
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 44.52 44.89 44.89 44.89 44.89 42.35 44.89 44.89 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 31.99 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 61.53 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 62.57 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 61.18 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 62.47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 30.52 30.52 30.52 36.03 36.03 New Jersey Phillipsburg 44.94 44.94 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.89 44.89 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 9 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities * (as of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 New York Ogdensburg 64.61 65.12 64.46 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 New York Rochester 35.30 37.54 38.91 47.01 33.32 33.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 36.03 36.03 New Jersey Phillipsburg 44.94 44.94 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.89 44.89 44.89 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 9 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities * (as of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 New York Ogdensburg 64.61 65.12 64.46 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 New York Rochester 35.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html
  • SERVICE BY COMMON CARRIERS; AND GRANTS OF RECOGNIZED PRIVATE OPERATING AGENCY STATUS [45] 63.09 Definitions applicable to international Section 214 authorizations. [46] [47]63.10 Regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers. [48] 63.11 Notification by and prior approval for U.S. international carriers that are or propose to become affiliated with a foreign carrier. [49] 63.12 Processing of international Section 214 applications. [50] 63.13 Procedures for modifying regulatory classification of U.S. international carriers from dominant to non-dominant. [51] 63.14 Prohibition on agreeing to accept special concessions. [52] 63.15 [removed] (see Section 63.23) [53] 63.16 [removed] [54] 63.17 Special provisions for U.S. international common carriers. [55] 63.18 Contents of applications for international common carriers. [56] 63.19 Special procedures for discontinuances of international services. [57] 63.20