FCC Web Documents citing 63.53

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1880A1.txt
  • Commission policy. The Report and Order was published in the Federal Register on July 9, 2002. The amendments to the following rules and changes to Commission policy are effective on August 8, 2002 (30 days after publication in the Federal Register): Section 43.81 is removed. Section 63.09 Note 2 is revised Section 63.10(e) is revised. Section 63.22(b) is revised. Section 63.53(b) is removed. The settlement rate benchmark condition will no longer apply to section 214 authorizations to provide facilities-based international private line service. The other amendments to the rules and changes to Commission policy adopted in the Report and Order contain new or modified information collections or are contingent on changes to those rules with new or modified information collections. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-671A1.txt
  • additional information if the Commission requests you to do so after it initially reviews your application or request. If you do not respond to the request or other official correspondence, the Commission may dismiss your application without prejudice and you may file again with a completed application. You can submit additional information on paper or electronically via email. 16. Section 63.53 is amended by adding a new paragraph (a) and re-designating the current paragraphs (a) and (b) to (b) and (c): . (2) Applications under Section 214 of the Communications Act that are not filed through IBFS shall be submitted on paper not more than 21.6cm (8.5 in) wide and not more than 35.6 cm (14 in) long with a left-hand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • Services 70 110.14 1.55 70 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 70 66.57 0.63 70 28.5% 0.8 29.6% 0.8 Double play package 70 115.61 1.15 70 29.7% 0.8 31.5% 1.0 Triple play package 70 147.68 0.95 70 37.0% 1.1 38.8% 1.1 Second operator subgroup (rivals) All Services 65 111.25 3.93 58 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 53 63.53 1.51 58 12.3% 1.9 13.5% 2.0 Double play package 52 107.56 3.45 58 16.1% 1.9 17.9% 2.0 Triple play package 50 129.11 5.63 58 52.7% 2.6 68.6% 3.5 DBS subgroup All Services 207 89.01 1.34 207 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 207 63.29 0.79 207 36.7% 0.9 39.7% 0.9 Double play package 207 106.21 1.00 207 31.5% 0.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • Table 1.5 (As of October 15) Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities 1 State City 19941995199619971998199920002001200220032004 22005 3 New Mexico Alamogordo 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 32.01 32.01 32.09 32.27 New York Binghamton 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 55.00 61.61 63.32 63.18 New York Buffalo 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 55.00 62.68 64.56 64.42 New York Massena 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 55.00 61.26 62.50 62.63 New York New York 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 55.00 62.62 64.60 64.53 New York Ogdensburg 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 55.00 62.91 64.42 64.28 New York Rochester 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities 1 State City 1994199519961997199819992000200120022003 2004 20052006 22007 3 New Mexico Alamogordo 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 32.01 32.01 32.09 32.27 33.60 33.49 New York Binghamton 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 55.00 61.61 63.32 63.18 63.06 63.18 New York Buffalo 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 55.00 62.68 64.56 64.42 64.51 64.63 New York Massena 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 55.00 61.26 62.50 62.63 62.71 62.83 New York New York 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 55.00 62.62 64.60 64.53 64.53 64.58 New York Ogdensburg 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 55.00 62.91 64.42 64.28 64.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.txt
  • provision that specifies the number of copies required to be filed where an application involves "only the supplementation of existing international facilities, and the issuance of a certificate is not required...." Applications to supplement already-authorized facilities are no longer required to be filed by U.S. international carriers. Therefore, this provision can be deleted as unnecessary. 7. Filings on Diskettes Section 63.53(b) sets forth procedures for the submission of Section 214 applications on computer diskettes. As part of the Commission's on-going efforts to process applications as quickly and efficiently as possible, the Commission established the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS). Since February 10, 1999, applicants have been able to use the IBFS to file electronically numerous applications, including international Section 214 applications.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-154A1.txt
  • the issuance of a certificate is not required . . ." As the Commission noted in the NPRM, U.S. international carriers are no longer required to file applications to supplement already-authorized facilities. No commenters addressed this proposal. Therefore, we delete this provision as unnecessary. 7. Filings on Diskettes We adopt the proposals to eliminate the provisions in section 63.10(d) and 63.53(b) that require or permit certain documents to be submitted on computer diskettes. Since February 10, 1999, applicants have been able to use the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) to file electronically numerous applications, including international section 214 applications. Given the ability of applicants to use the IBFS to file international Section 214 applications, we no longer find it in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.txt
  • other formal objections have been filed to the application, the amendment shall be served on the parties. * * * * * Section 63.51(c) is amended to read as follows: § 63.51 Additional Information. (c) You must submit electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) any additional information which the Commission may require. * * * * * Section 63.53 is amended to read as follows: § 63.53 Form. . * * * * * Section 63.701 is amended by revising the introductory paragraph to read as follows: § 63.701 Contents of Application. . A request for designation as a recognized operating agency within the meaning of the International Telecommunication Convention shall include a statement of the nature of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.txt
  • DC 20520-5818; Office of Chief Counsel/NTIA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; and Defense Information Systems Agency, Code RGC, 701 S. Courthouse Road, Arlington, Va. 22204, and shall certify such service on a service list attached to the application or other filing. * * * * * . See also §§ 63.20 and 63.53. * * * * * Section 1.768 is amended by revising paragraphs (h) and (i) and adding a new paragraph (j) to read as follows: § 1.768 Notification by and prior approval for submarine cable landing licensees that are or propose to become affiliated with a foreign carrier. * * * * * (h) All licensees are responsible for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1_Erratum.doc
  • DC 20520-5818; Office of Chief Counsel/NTIA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; and Defense Information Systems Agency, Code RGC, 701 S. Courthouse Road, Arlington, Va. 22204, and shall certify such service on a service list attached to the application or other filing. * * * * * . See also §§ 63.20 and 63.53. * * * * * Section 1.768 is amended by revising paragraphs (h) and (i) and adding a new paragraph (j) to read as follows: § 1.768 Notification by and prior approval for submarine cable landing licensees that are or propose to become affiliated with a foreign carrier. * * * * * (h) All licensees are responsible for the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1999 20002001 State City New Jersey Phillipsburg 44.94 44.94 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.89 44.89 44.89 44.89 42.35 42.35 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 30.00 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 57.13 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 58.17 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 57.33 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 58.32 New York Ogdensburg 64.61 65.12 64.46 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 57.33 New York Rochester 35.30 37.54 38.91 47.01 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 31.99 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 61.53 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 62.57 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 61.18 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 62.47 New York Ogdensburg 64.61 65.12 64.46 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 62.83 New York Rochester 35.30 37.54 38.91 47.01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 44.89 44.89 Table 1.5 (As of October 15) Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities 1 State City 1993199419951996199719981999200020012002 220033 New Mexico Alamogordo 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 32.01 32.01 New York Binghamton 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 55.00 55.00 New York Buffalo 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 55.00 55.00 New York Massena 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 55.00 55.00 New York New York 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 55.00 55.00 New York Ogdensburg 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 55.00 55.00 New York Rochester 47.01 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Table 1.5 (As of October 15) Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities 1 State City 19931994199519961997199819992000200120022003 220043 New Mexico Alamogordo 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 32.01 32.01 32.09 New York Binghamton 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 55.00 61.61 61.61 New York Buffalo 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 55.00 62.68 62.68 New York Massena 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 55.00 61.26 61.26 New York New York 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 55.00 62.62 62.62 New York Ogdensburg 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 55.00 62.91 62.91 New York Rochester 47.01 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 0.0800 43.06 3.50 Montana Butte US West 19.69 13.97 0.0500 25.00 2.99 Nebraska Grand Island US West 23.27 15.65 0.1030 22.94 2.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg Bell Atlantic 13.05 9.91 0.1000 44.89 1.25 New Mexico Alamogordo US West 20.99 13.23 0.1560 31.86 2.99 New York Binghamton Bell Atlantic 23.74 13.25 0.1114 62.41 1.04 New York Buffalo Bell Atlantic 28.27 13.41 0.1134 63.53 1.04 New York Massena Bell Atlantic 20.31 13.05 0.1118 62.05 1.04 New York New York City Bell Atlantic 24.86 13.49 0.1137 63.84 1.04 New York Ogdensburg Bell Atlantic 20.88 13.73 0.1118 63.79 1.04 New York Rochester Frontier 17.86 10.51 0.0865 33.32 1.99 North Carolina Raleigh BellSouth 17.23 44.03 3.95 5 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html
  • Subject to the availability of electronic forms, notifications descibed in this section must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS). A list of forms that are available for electronic filing can be found on the IBFS homepage. For information on electronic filing requirements, see part 1, 1.1000-1.10018 and the IBFS homepage at [98]http://www.fcc.gov/ibfs. See also 63.20 and 63.53. 63.12 Processing of international Section 214 applications. (a) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this section, a complete application seeking authorization under [99] 63.18 shall be granted by the Commission 14 days after the date of public notice listing the application as accepted for filing. (b) The applicant may commence operation on the 15th day after the date of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1880A1.txt
  • Commission policy. The Report and Order was published in the Federal Register on July 9, 2002. The amendments to the following rules and changes to Commission policy are effective on August 8, 2002 (30 days after publication in the Federal Register): Section 43.81 is removed. Section 63.09 Note 2 is revised Section 63.10(e) is revised. Section 63.22(b) is revised. Section 63.53(b) is removed. The settlement rate benchmark condition will no longer apply to section 214 authorizations to provide facilities-based international private line service. The other amendments to the rules and changes to Commission policy adopted in the Report and Order contain new or modified information collections or are contingent on changes to those rules with new or modified information collections. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-671A1.txt
  • additional information if the Commission requests you to do so after it initially reviews your application or request. If you do not respond to the request or other official correspondence, the Commission may dismiss your application without prejudice and you may file again with a completed application. You can submit additional information on paper or electronically via email. 16. Section 63.53 is amended by adding a new paragraph (a) and re-designating the current paragraphs (a) and (b) to (b) and (c): . (2) Applications under Section 214 of the Communications Act that are not filed through IBFS shall be submitted on paper not more than 21.6cm (8.5 in) wide and not more than 35.6 cm (14 in) long with a left-hand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • Services 70 110.14 1.55 70 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 70 66.57 0.63 70 28.5% 0.8 29.6% 0.8 Double play package 70 115.61 1.15 70 29.7% 0.8 31.5% 1.0 Triple play package 70 147.68 0.95 70 37.0% 1.1 38.8% 1.1 Second operator subgroup (rivals) All Services 65 111.25 3.93 58 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 53 63.53 1.51 58 12.3% 1.9 13.5% 2.0 Double play package 52 107.56 3.45 58 16.1% 1.9 17.9% 2.0 Triple play package 50 129.11 5.63 58 52.7% 2.6 68.6% 3.5 DBS subgroup All Services 207 89.01 1.34 207 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 207 63.29 0.79 207 36.7% 0.9 39.7% 0.9 Double play package 207 106.21 1.00 207 31.5% 0.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • Table 1.5 (As of October 15) Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities 1 State City 19941995199619971998199920002001200220032004 22005 3 New Mexico Alamogordo 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 32.01 32.01 32.09 32.27 New York Binghamton 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 55.00 61.61 63.32 63.18 New York Buffalo 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 55.00 62.68 64.56 64.42 New York Massena 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 55.00 61.26 62.50 62.63 New York New York 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 55.00 62.62 64.60 64.53 New York Ogdensburg 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 55.00 62.91 64.42 64.28 New York Rochester 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities 1 State City 1994199519961997199819992000200120022003 2004 20052006 22007 3 New Mexico Alamogordo 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 32.01 32.01 32.09 32.27 33.60 33.49 New York Binghamton 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 55.00 61.61 63.32 63.18 63.06 63.18 New York Buffalo 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 55.00 62.68 64.56 64.42 64.51 64.63 New York Massena 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 55.00 61.26 62.50 62.63 62.71 62.83 New York New York 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 55.00 62.62 64.60 64.53 64.53 64.58 New York Ogdensburg 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 55.00 62.91 64.42 64.28 64.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.txt
  • provision that specifies the number of copies required to be filed where an application involves "only the supplementation of existing international facilities, and the issuance of a certificate is not required...." Applications to supplement already-authorized facilities are no longer required to be filed by U.S. international carriers. Therefore, this provision can be deleted as unnecessary. 7. Filings on Diskettes Section 63.53(b) sets forth procedures for the submission of Section 214 applications on computer diskettes. As part of the Commission's on-going efforts to process applications as quickly and efficiently as possible, the Commission established the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS). Since February 10, 1999, applicants have been able to use the IBFS to file electronically numerous applications, including international Section 214 applications.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-154A1.txt
  • the issuance of a certificate is not required . . ." As the Commission noted in the NPRM, U.S. international carriers are no longer required to file applications to supplement already-authorized facilities. No commenters addressed this proposal. Therefore, we delete this provision as unnecessary. 7. Filings on Diskettes We adopt the proposals to eliminate the provisions in section 63.10(d) and 63.53(b) that require or permit certain documents to be submitted on computer diskettes. Since February 10, 1999, applicants have been able to use the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) to file electronically numerous applications, including international section 214 applications. Given the ability of applicants to use the IBFS to file international Section 214 applications, we no longer find it in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.txt
  • other formal objections have been filed to the application, the amendment shall be served on the parties. * * * * * Section 63.51(c) is amended to read as follows: § 63.51 Additional Information. (c) You must submit electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) any additional information which the Commission may require. * * * * * Section 63.53 is amended to read as follows: § 63.53 Form. . * * * * * Section 63.701 is amended by revising the introductory paragraph to read as follows: § 63.701 Contents of Application. . A request for designation as a recognized operating agency within the meaning of the International Telecommunication Convention shall include a statement of the nature of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.txt
  • DC 20520-5818; Office of Chief Counsel/NTIA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; and Defense Information Systems Agency, Code RGC, 701 S. Courthouse Road, Arlington, Va. 22204, and shall certify such service on a service list attached to the application or other filing. * * * * * . See also §§ 63.20 and 63.53. * * * * * Section 1.768 is amended by revising paragraphs (h) and (i) and adding a new paragraph (j) to read as follows: § 1.768 Notification by and prior approval for submarine cable landing licensees that are or propose to become affiliated with a foreign carrier. * * * * * (h) All licensees are responsible for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1_Erratum.doc
  • DC 20520-5818; Office of Chief Counsel/NTIA, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; and Defense Information Systems Agency, Code RGC, 701 S. Courthouse Road, Arlington, Va. 22204, and shall certify such service on a service list attached to the application or other filing. * * * * * . See also §§ 63.20 and 63.53. * * * * * Section 1.768 is amended by revising paragraphs (h) and (i) and adding a new paragraph (j) to read as follows: § 1.768 Notification by and prior approval for submarine cable landing licensees that are or propose to become affiliated with a foreign carrier. * * * * * (h) All licensees are responsible for the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1999 20002001 State City New Jersey Phillipsburg 44.94 44.94 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.52 44.89 44.89 44.89 44.89 42.35 42.35 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 30.00 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 57.13 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 58.17 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 57.33 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 58.32 New York Ogdensburg 64.61 65.12 64.46 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 57.33 New York Rochester 35.30 37.54 38.91 47.01 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 New Mexico Alamogordo 57.77 57.77 55.38 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 31.99 New York Binghamton 62.64 63.13 62.48 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 61.53 New York Buffalo 63.81 64.84 64.19 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 62.57 New York Massena 62.85 63.34 62.69 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 61.18 New York New York 64.69 65.24 64.64 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 62.47 New York Ogdensburg 64.61 65.12 64.46 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 62.83 New York Rochester 35.30 37.54 38.91 47.01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 44.89 44.89 Table 1.5 (As of October 15) Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities 1 State City 1993199419951996199719981999200020012002 220033 New Mexico Alamogordo 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 32.01 32.01 New York Binghamton 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 55.00 55.00 New York Buffalo 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 55.00 55.00 New York Massena 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 55.00 55.00 New York New York 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 55.00 55.00 New York Ogdensburg 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 55.00 55.00 New York Rochester 47.01 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Table 1.5 (As of October 15) Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities 1 State City 19931994199519961997199819992000200120022003 220043 New Mexico Alamogordo 31.86 31.96 31.96 31.86 31.86 31.86 31.86 30.00 31.99 32.01 32.01 32.09 New York Binghamton 62.48 62.42 62.71 62.59 62.47 62.41 62.41 57.13 61.53 55.00 61.61 61.61 New York Buffalo 64.19 64.13 63.83 63.71 63.59 63.53 63.53 58.17 62.57 55.00 62.68 62.68 New York Massena 62.69 62.63 62.34 62.22 62.10 62.05 62.05 57.33 61.18 55.00 61.26 61.26 New York New York 64.64 64.58 64.29 64.02 63.90 63.84 63.84 58.32 62.47 55.00 62.62 62.62 New York Ogdensburg 64.46 64.39 64.09 63.97 63.85 63.79 63.79 57.33 62.83 55.00 62.91 62.91 New York Rochester 47.01 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 0.0800 43.06 3.50 Montana Butte US West 19.69 13.97 0.0500 25.00 2.99 Nebraska Grand Island US West 23.27 15.65 0.1030 22.94 2.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg Bell Atlantic 13.05 9.91 0.1000 44.89 1.25 New Mexico Alamogordo US West 20.99 13.23 0.1560 31.86 2.99 New York Binghamton Bell Atlantic 23.74 13.25 0.1114 62.41 1.04 New York Buffalo Bell Atlantic 28.27 13.41 0.1134 63.53 1.04 New York Massena Bell Atlantic 20.31 13.05 0.1118 62.05 1.04 New York New York City Bell Atlantic 24.86 13.49 0.1137 63.84 1.04 New York Ogdensburg Bell Atlantic 20.88 13.73 0.1118 63.79 1.04 New York Rochester Frontier 17.86 10.51 0.0865 33.32 1.99 North Carolina Raleigh BellSouth 17.23 44.03 3.95 5 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html
  • Subject to the availability of electronic forms, notifications descibed in this section must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS). A list of forms that are available for electronic filing can be found on the IBFS homepage. For information on electronic filing requirements, see part 1, 1.1000-1.10018 and the IBFS homepage at [98]http://www.fcc.gov/ibfs. See also 63.20 and 63.53. 63.12 Processing of international Section 214 applications. (a) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this section, a complete application seeking authorization under [99] 63.18 shall be granted by the Commission 14 days after the date of public notice listing the application as accepted for filing. (b) The applicant may commence operation on the 15th day after the date of