FCC Web Documents citing 64.1504

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • circumvention of the pay-per-call rules. Need: Part 64, subpart O is intended both to promote the legitimate development of pay-per-call services and protect consumers from the fraudulent or unscrupulous provision of pay-per-call services. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 228. Section Number and Title: 64.1501 Definitions. 64.1502 Limitations on the provision of pay-per-call services. 64.1503 Termination of pay-per-call and other information programs. 64.1504 Restrictions on the use of toll-free numbers. 64.1505 Restrictions on collect telephone calls. 64.1506 Number designation. 64.1507 Prohibition on disconnection or interruption of service for failure to remit pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1508 Blocking access to 900 service. 64.1509 Disclosure and dissemination of pay-per-call information. 64.1510 Billing and collection of pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • circumvention of the pay-per-call rules. Need: Part 64, Subpart O is intended both to promote the legitimate development of pay-per-call services and protect consumers from the fraudulent or unscrupulous provision of pay-per-call services. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 228. Section Numbers and Titles: 64.1501 Definitions. 64.1502 Limitations on the provision of pay-per-call services. 64.1503 Termination of pay-per-call and other information programs. 64.1504 Restrictions on the use of toll-free numbers. 64.1505 Restrictions on collect telephone calls. 64.1506 Number designation. 64.1507 Prohibition on disconnection or interruption of service for failure to remit pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1508 Blocking access to 900 service. 64.1509 Disclosure and dissemination of pay-per-call information. 64.1510 Billing and collection of pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec. 64.1504 04/30/10 3060-0749 Sec. 64.1509 04/30/10 3060-0750 Secs. 73.671 and 73.673 07/31/08 3060-0751 Reports Concerning International Private Lines Interconnected to the U.S. Public Switched Network 01/31/09 3060-0752 Sec. 64.1510 04/30/10 3060-0754 FCC 398 06/30/09 3060-0755 Secs. 59.1, 59.2, 59.3 and 59.4 03/31/09 3060-0757 FCC Auctions Customer Survey 03/31/10 3060-0758 Amendment of Part 5 of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Experimental
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.txt
  • 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 and CC Docket No. 95-116 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec. 64.1504 04/30/10 3060-0749 Sec. 64.1509 04/30/10 3060-0750 Secs. 73.671 and 73.673 07/31/11 3060-0751 Reports Concerning International Private Lines Interconnected to the U.S. Public Switched Network 01/31/09 3060-0752 Sec. 64.1510 04/30/10 3060-0754 FCC 398 06/30/09 3060-0755 Secs. 59.1, 59.2, 59.3 and 59.4 03/31/09 3060-0757 FCC Auctions Customer Survey 03/31/10 3060-0758 Amendment of Part 5 of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Experimental
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32, 52.33, 52.34, 52.35, and 52.36; and CC Docket No. 95-116 07/31/13 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 02/28/13 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 10/31/12 3060-0748 Secs. 64.1504, 64.1509, and 64.1510 04/30/13 3060-0750 Secs. 73.671 and 73.673 07/31/11 3060-0751 Sec. 43.51, Reports Concerning International Private Lines Interconnected to the U.S. Public Switched Network 12/31/11 3060-0754 FCC 398 04/30/12 3060-0755 Secs. 59.1, 59.2, 59.3 and 59.4 03/31/12 3060-0757 FCC Auctions Customer Survey 05/31/13 3060-0758 Secs. 5.55, 5.61, 5.75, 5.85, and 5.93, Experimental Radio Service Regulations, ET Docket No. 96-256
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.txt
  • the subscriber - not necessarily the calling party - who is assessed charges for calls placed over that line. It would not seem appropriate for an individual calling a toll-free number to be protected from incurring charges without extending the same protection to the individual or entity billed for the calls. We seek comment on whether we should amend section 64.1504 of our rules explicitly to protect the subscriber as well from the practices that Congress has chosen to prohibit. Would such an amendment help to protect small businesses from calls made by employees? Use of Number Identification for Billing through Toll-Free Numbers Section 228(c)(7)(A) of the 1996 Act prohibits ``the calling party being assessed, by virtue of completing the call
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.txt
  • relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and, further, a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation. E-Sign Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001(a). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R.§ 64.1504(c)(2) (noting disclosure requirements for pay-per-call). ``Affirmative consent'' as defined in the Act means: 1) that the recipient expressly consented either in response to a clear and conspicuous request for such consent, or at the recipient's own initiative; and 2) in cases when the message is from a party other than the party which received consent, that the recipient was given
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.txt
  • validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and, further, a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation. E-sign Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001(a). See, e.g., CAN-SPAM Act, Section 5. CAN-SPAM Act, Section 3(1). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R.§ 64.1504(c)(2) (noting disclosure requirements for pay-per-call). We discuss the compliance of senders with the requirements of the CAN-SPAM Act given the ``unique technical aspects'' of devices receiving MSCM. See infra Part 3.D. CAN-SPAM Act, Section 14(b)(2). See supra para. 32. CAN-SPAM Act, Section 14(b)(3). Id. For example, in the 1992 TCPA Order, the Commission concluded that calls made by cellular carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • circumvention of the pay-per-call rules. Need: Part 64, subpart O is intended both to promote the legitimate development of pay-per-call services and protect consumers from the fraudulent or unscrupulous provision of pay-per-call services. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 228. Section Number and Title: 64.1501 Definitions. 64.1502 Limitations on the provision of pay-per-call services. 64.1503 Termination of pay-per-call and other information programs. 64.1504 Restrictions on the use of toll-free numbers. 64.1505 Restrictions on collect telephone calls. 64.1506 Number designation. 64.1507 Prohibition on disconnection or interruption of service for failure to remit pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1508 Blocking access to 900 service. 64.1509 Disclosure and dissemination of pay-per-call information. 64.1510 Billing and collection of pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • circumvention of the pay-per-call rules. Need: Part 64, Subpart O is intended both to promote the legitimate development of pay-per-call services and protect consumers from the fraudulent or unscrupulous provision of pay-per-call services. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 228. Section Numbers and Titles: 64.1501 Definitions. 64.1502 Limitations on the provision of pay-per-call services. 64.1503 Termination of pay-per-call and other information programs. 64.1504 Restrictions on the use of toll-free numbers. 64.1505 Restrictions on collect telephone calls. 64.1506 Number designation. 64.1507 Prohibition on disconnection or interruption of service for failure to remit pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1508 Blocking access to 900 service. 64.1509 Disclosure and dissemination of pay-per-call information. 64.1510 Billing and collection of pay-per-call and similar service charges. 64.1511 Forgiveness of charges
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • 52.21, 52.22, 52.23, 52.24, 52.25, 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec. 64.1504 04/30/10 3060-0749 Sec. 64.1509 04/30/10 3060-0750 Secs. 73.671 and 73.673 07/31/08 3060-0751 Reports Concerning International Private Lines Interconnected to the U.S. Public Switched Network 01/31/09 3060-0752 Sec. 64.1510 04/30/10 3060-0754 FCC 398 06/30/09 3060-0755 Secs. 59.1, 59.2, 59.3 and 59.4 03/31/09 3060-0757 FCC Auctions Customer Survey 03/31/10 3060-0758 Amendment of Part 5 of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Experimental
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.txt
  • 52.26, 52.27, 52.28, 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32 and 52.33 and CC Docket No. 95-116 11/30/08 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 01/31/10 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 11/30/09 3060-0748 Sec. 64.1504 04/30/10 3060-0749 Sec. 64.1509 04/30/10 3060-0750 Secs. 73.671 and 73.673 07/31/11 3060-0751 Reports Concerning International Private Lines Interconnected to the U.S. Public Switched Network 01/31/09 3060-0752 Sec. 64.1510 04/30/10 3060-0754 FCC 398 06/30/09 3060-0755 Secs. 59.1, 59.2, 59.3 and 59.4 03/31/09 3060-0757 FCC Auctions Customer Survey 03/31/10 3060-0758 Amendment of Part 5 of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Experimental
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • 52.29, 52.30, 52.31, 52.32, 52.33, 52.34, 52.35, and 52.36; and CC Docket No. 95-116 07/31/13 3060-0743 Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - CC Docket No. 96-128 02/28/13 3060-0745 Implementation of the Local Exchange Carrier Tariff Streamlining Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 10/31/12 3060-0748 Secs. 64.1504, 64.1509, and 64.1510 04/30/13 3060-0750 Secs. 73.671 and 73.673 07/31/11 3060-0751 Sec. 43.51, Reports Concerning International Private Lines Interconnected to the U.S. Public Switched Network 12/31/11 3060-0754 FCC 398 04/30/12 3060-0755 Secs. 59.1, 59.2, 59.3 and 59.4 03/31/12 3060-0757 FCC Auctions Customer Survey 05/31/13 3060-0758 Secs. 5.55, 5.61, 5.75, 5.85, and 5.93, Experimental Radio Service Regulations, ET Docket No. 96-256
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-162A1.txt
  • the subscriber - not necessarily the calling party - who is assessed charges for calls placed over that line. It would not seem appropriate for an individual calling a toll-free number to be protected from incurring charges without extending the same protection to the individual or entity billed for the calls. We seek comment on whether we should amend section 64.1504 of our rules explicitly to protect the subscriber as well from the practices that Congress has chosen to prohibit. Would such an amendment help to protect small businesses from calls made by employees? Use of Number Identification for Billing through Toll-Free Numbers Section 228(c)(7)(A) of the 1996 Act prohibits ``the calling party being assessed, by virtue of completing the call
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.txt
  • relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and, further, a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation. E-Sign Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001(a). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R.§ 64.1504(c)(2) (noting disclosure requirements for pay-per-call). ``Affirmative consent'' as defined in the Act means: 1) that the recipient expressly consented either in response to a clear and conspicuous request for such consent, or at the recipient's own initiative; and 2) in cases when the message is from a party other than the party which received consent, that the recipient was given
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.txt
  • validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and, further, a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation. E-sign Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001(a). See, e.g., CAN-SPAM Act, Section 5. CAN-SPAM Act, Section 3(1). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R.§ 64.1504(c)(2) (noting disclosure requirements for pay-per-call). We discuss the compliance of senders with the requirements of the CAN-SPAM Act given the ``unique technical aspects'' of devices receiving MSCM. See infra Part 3.D. CAN-SPAM Act, Section 14(b)(2). See supra para. 32. CAN-SPAM Act, Section 14(b)(3). Id. For example, in the 1992 TCPA Order, the Commission concluded that calls made by cellular carriers