FCC Web Documents citing 64.706

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-203A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. § 64.705(a)(3). 47 U.S.C. § 226(b)(1)(I); 47 C.F.R. § 64.705(a)(4). 47 C.F.R. § 64.703(a)(4); See Billed Party Preference for InterLATA 0+ Calls, Second Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 6122 (1998). 47 U.S.C. § 226(b)(1)(D-E); 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.703(e), 64.704(b), 64.705(a)(5). 47 C.F.R. § 64.707. See also 47 U.S.C. § 226(d)(3)(B). 47 C.F.R. § 64.706. See also 47 U.S.C. § 226(d)(3)(A). See PCIA Forbearance Order and Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 16894, ¶ 75. PCIA Forbearance Order and Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 16903, ¶ 96. PCIA Forbearance Order and Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 16899-900, ¶¶ 87-88. In the GTE Declaratory Ruling, the Common Carrier Bureau found that GTE Airfone, GTE Railfone, and GTE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98134.pdf
  • regulatory scheme of TOCSIA also affirmatively charges OSPs with overseeing aggregator compliance with both the statute's posting requirement and its prohibitions on restricting Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-134 203 47 U.S.C. § 226(b)(1)(D-E); 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.703(e), 64.704(b), 64.705(a)(5). 204 See 47 U.S.C. § 226(h). 205 47 C.F.R. § 64.707. See also 47 U.S.C. § 226(d)(3)(B). 206 47 C.F.R. § 64.706. See also 47 U.S.C. § 226(d)(3)(A). 207 GTE Declaratory Ruling, 8 FCC Rcd. at 6176, ¶ 31. 208 See generally GTE Reconsideration Petition. 209 CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. at 1490, ¶ 211. 210 Further Forbearance NPRM, 9 FCC Rcd. at 2169, ¶ 23. 35 consumers' access to the OSP of their choice.203 Finally, TOCSIA requires OSPs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-203A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. § 64.705(a)(3). 47 U.S.C. § 226(b)(1)(I); 47 C.F.R. § 64.705(a)(4). 47 C.F.R. § 64.703(a)(4); See Billed Party Preference for InterLATA 0+ Calls, Second Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 6122 (1998). 47 U.S.C. § 226(b)(1)(D-E); 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.703(e), 64.704(b), 64.705(a)(5). 47 C.F.R. § 64.707. See also 47 U.S.C. § 226(d)(3)(B). 47 C.F.R. § 64.706. See also 47 U.S.C. § 226(d)(3)(A). See PCIA Forbearance Order and Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 16894, ¶ 75. PCIA Forbearance Order and Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 16903, ¶ 96. PCIA Forbearance Order and Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 16899-900, ¶¶ 87-88. In the GTE Declaratory Ruling, the Common Carrier Bureau found that GTE Airfone, GTE Railfone, and GTE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98134.pdf
  • regulatory scheme of TOCSIA also affirmatively charges OSPs with overseeing aggregator compliance with both the statute's posting requirement and its prohibitions on restricting Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-134 203 47 U.S.C. § 226(b)(1)(D-E); 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.703(e), 64.704(b), 64.705(a)(5). 204 See 47 U.S.C. § 226(h). 205 47 C.F.R. § 64.707. See also 47 U.S.C. § 226(d)(3)(B). 206 47 C.F.R. § 64.706. See also 47 U.S.C. § 226(d)(3)(A). 207 GTE Declaratory Ruling, 8 FCC Rcd. at 6176, ¶ 31. 208 See generally GTE Reconsideration Petition. 209 CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. at 1490, ¶ 211. 210 Further Forbearance NPRM, 9 FCC Rcd. at 2169, ¶ 23. 35 consumers' access to the OSP of their choice.203 Finally, TOCSIA requires OSPs