FCC Web Documents citing 69.1

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 06 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf
  • and any such charge, practice, classification or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful.'' Complaint at 4, � 4; Joint Statement, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed June 6, 2007) (``Joint Statement'') at 1, � 2. Joint Statement at 1-2, � 4. Joint Statement at 2, � 5. Joint Statement at 1-2, � 4. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.2. Complaint at 6, � 8; Answer of Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Company, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed May 29, 2007) (``Answer'') at 12, � 8. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601-69.612. Complaint at 6-7, � 9; Answer at 12, � 9; see 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(d). Complaint at 6-7, � 9; Answer at 12, � 9; see 47 C.F.R. �� 69.604,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-983A1.txt
  • proceedings associated with these petitions the following file numbers: 1) Petition for Reinstatement of Southern California Pay Phone Company, File No. E-99-29; Petition for Reinstatement of Total, File No. E-99-30. See C.F. Communications Corp., et al., v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., et al., 12 FCC Rcd 2134 (1997) (Denial Order). See 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. C.F. Communications Corporation v. FCC, No. 97-1202, slip. op. (D.C. Cir. 1997). The Commission subsequently took voluntary remand of several other cases raising the same issues that were the subject of appeals of a separate order and consolidated the cases from both proceedings for purposes of the remand proceeding. See C.F. Communications Corporation v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.txt
  • Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22497, 22555 (1998); Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 01-78 (rel. Mar. 7, 2001). See Appendix A for a list of the parties. 47 U.S.C. � 201(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references are to the 2000 edition. We refer to prior C.F.R. editions in instances where the prior rules were different than the current rules. C.F. Communications Corp., et al. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Remand, 15 FCC Rcd 8759 (2000) (``Liability Order''); recon. denied, 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.txt
  • v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098, 1109 (D.C. Cir. 2001). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3671, � 5. See also Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2225, 2226 (EB 2002), at � 3 (``Second Waiver Order''). Second Waiver Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 2226, � 3.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.txt
  • the Secretary of the Commission shall cause to have this Order published in the Federal Register. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint. 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97-1202, slip. op (D.C. Cir. 1997); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc. et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 7334, 7335-36 (1993); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.txt
  • at 2001-03, paras. 21-23. The bush policy has since been repealed. See Policy for Licensing Domestic Satellite Earth Stations in the Bush Communities of Alaska, IB Docket No. 02-30, RM No. 7246, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16874 (2003). CAP Approval Reconsideration Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 2005, para. 27. Id. at 2003-05, paras. 25-27. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. See e.g., Klick-Murphy Declaration at 11-12, para. 22. Klick-Murphy Declaration at 3-4, paras. 9-10 and 14, para. 27. The rates in Alascom's 2003 tariff filing are based on data collected from July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002. See Waiver Denial, 18 FCC Rcd at 16460, para. 26. Klick-Murphy Declaration at 16-18, paras. 30-31. Alascom Tariff FCC No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2865A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. f/k/a South Central Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-023 (filed January 14, 2004). Because the Commission order assessing liability in this case was on appeal to the D.C. Circuit at the time this motion was filed, we deferred ruling
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2866A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2866A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a TDS Telcom, Communications Corporation of Indiana d/b/a TDS Telcom, and Home Telephone Company of Pittsboro, Inc., Supplement to Formal complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-025 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3476A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3477A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. . Communications Vending corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-029 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Payphone Systems v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.txt
  • 45 922. 439.0 986461 31060.6 1136463 35482.8 IA IOWA CITY KWKB 35096 20 1510.0 123. 25 50.0 123.0 416517 11148.8 435418 11546.9 IA MASON CITY KIMT 66402 03 100.00 472. 42 1000 472.0 541340 32490.5 764343 42342.3 IA MASON CITY KYIN 29086 24 1740.0 436. 18 50.0 436.0 275143 19678.0 278471 19786.5 IA OTTUMWA KYOU-TV 53820 15 2090.0 363. 14 69.1 363.0 352684 19741.6 360213 19990.1 IA RED OAK KHIN 29085 36 2040.0 475. 35 63.1 475.0 814888 19923.6 822186 20191.6 IA SIOUX CITY KCAU-TV 11265 09 309.00 616. 30 767. 616.0 493722 38126.6 563706 44072.3 IA SIOUX CITY KMEG 39665 14 1000.0 351. 39 50.0 351.0 269228 18992.7 269369 19041.0 IA SIOUX CITY KPTH 77451 44 5000.0 610. 49 226.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed April 11, 2005). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1972 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1972 0 � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1973A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. CenturyTel, Inc. and Century Telephone of Central Indiana, Inc. f/k/a Central Indiana Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-024 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. CenturyTel, Inc. and Century Telephone of Central Indiana, Inc. f/k/a Central Indiana Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1974A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-022 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Notice of Settlement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-028 (filed April 26, 2002). NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-028 (filed May 17, 2005). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1975 Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3072A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety and the proceedings ARE TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation f/k/a US West Communications, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-019 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); IMR Capital Corporation v. Verizon New England, Inc. f/k/a New England Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-020 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Verizon North, Inc. f/k/a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.txt
  • 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back for statute of limitations purposes to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8; Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2115 (EB 2002) (``Second Waiver Order''); Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2679A1.txt
  • at 5. Petition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c); see also Southeast Arkansas Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 61 FCC 2d 72 (1976) (reconsideration denied where evidence could have been discovered with due diligence). Petition at 6. Id. at 10. Mount Pisgah Application, Exhibit response to Section II, Question 2(a). Petition at 10. North Carolina General Statutes, � 1-69.1. Id., � 55-1-40(9)a.3. Id., � 39-24. Petition at 10. Cherokee Home Demonstration Club v. Oxendine, 100 N.C. App. 622, 397 S.E.2d 643 (1990). See National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 June 19, 2007 DA 07-2679 In Reply Refer to: 1800B3-BSH Released: June 19, 2007 ��`��gd, I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.txt
  • N N - - A A 45 NTSC Y Y NTSC -23.0 O O 46 ATSC Y Y ATSC -20.7 O O 47 ATSC N N NTSC -78.7 A A 48 ATSC Y N ATSC < -69.2 O O 49 NTSC N N NTSC -93.1 A A 50 NTSC Y Y NTSC -66.1 O A 51 ATSC Y N NTSC -69.1 O O TABLE 5-10. I2R WSD Prototype Results at Test Site 2. CH Signal Type (Database) Within Service Contour? (Y/N) Viewable? (Y/N) Signal Type (Measured) Measured Power Level (dBm) Occupied (O) & Available (A) Channels Reported by WSD L1/ S1 L1/ S2 L2/ S1 L2/ S2 21 - N N - < -71.0 - - - - 22 NTSC Y
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.txt
  • Y 39 D 620.3 -65.3 N 40 D 626.3 -20.4 Y 41 D 632.3 -44.7 Y 42 D 638.3 -43.9 Y 43 N 645.25 -72.7 6 44 45 N 657.25 -23 2 46 D 662.3 -20.7 Y 47 N 669.2 -78.7 N 48 D 674.3 <-69.2 N 49 N 681.2 -93.1 N 50 N 687.25 -66.1 5 51 N 693.2 -69.1 N Table C-6. Measurement Results - Ellicott City Site Channel Signal Type (N or D) Frequency (MHz) Measured Power (dBm) Viewable (Picture/TASO) Reported PSIP 21 N 513.25 -95.7 N 22 N 519.28 -29.8 1 23 N 525.2 -72 N 24 N 531.26 -39.2 1 25 N 537.24 -72.8 N 26 N 543.24 -37.2 1 27 D 548.3 -50.9 Y 26.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.txt
  • bureaus to dismiss petitions for) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 182.899 Tm 100 Tz (reconsideration of Commission action that are procedurally defective\). Letter from Deborah Sandidge, Lincoln) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 171.399 Tm 99 Tz (Parish School Board, to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, filed June 28, 2006, 1) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 159.849 Tm (\(Lincoln Parish Petition for Reconsideration\); Letter from Mozes Greenfield, Telecommunications Project Director,) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 148.349 Tm (United Talmudical Academy, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket Nos. 96-) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 136.849 Tm (45 and 97-21, filed Dec. 22, 2003, 1 \(UTA Petition for Reconsideration\); Letter from Orin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.txt
  • Tr /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (Federal Communications Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 481.9 731.1 Tm 98 Tz (DA 11-1119) Tj 1 0 0 1 279.1 707.799 Tm (Before the) Tj 1 0 0 1 213.8 695.1 Tm 99 Tz (Federal Communications Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 245 682.35 Tm 101 Tz (Washington, D.C. 20554) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 657.149 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (In the Matter of) Tj 1 0 0 1 304.55 655 Tm 76 Tz (\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 304.55 642.5 Tm 59 Tz /OPBaseFont1 14 Tf (\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 631.95 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service) Tj 1 0 0 1 304.55 629.799
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.txt
  • 10 Tf (and Order upgrading and modernizing the B-rate program to encourage the expansion of fast, affordable) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 692.7 Tm (Internet access in schools and libraries across the country.4 As part of the) Tj 1 0 0 1 396.7 692.2 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Schools and Libraries Sixth) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 679.95 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Report and Order, the Commission launched a pilot program - EDU2O 11 - to investigate the merits and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 667.25 Tm (challenges of wireless off-premises connectivity services for mobile learning devices, and to help the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 654.75 Tm 108 Tz (Commission determine whether
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.txt
  • 0 1 69.35 430.849 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (By the Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau:) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.55 407.049 Tm 83 Tz (1.) Tj 1 0 0 1 132.45 407.099 Tm 109 Tz (In this order, we dismiss as untimely petitions for reconsideration by Rockwood School) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 394.599 Tm 110 Tz (District, Eureka, Missouri \(Rockwood\) and Yakutat School District, Yakutat, Alaska \(Yakutat\) of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 382.149 Tm 108 Tz (decisions by the Wireline Competition Bureau \(Bureau\).1) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 358.349 Tm 96 Tz (2.) Tj 1 0 0 1 132.45 358.349 Tm 109 Tz (The petitioners seek reconsideration of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.txt
  • the proposed compliance plan filed by) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 449.349 Tm 100 Tz (Cricket Communications, Inc. \(Cricket\).' By filing this compliance plan, Cricket seeks to satisfy the) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 436.849 Tm 99 Tz (conditions imposed by the Commission in granting Cricket's petition to forbear from the requirement that) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 424.149 Tm (its service area conform to the underlying service area of the rural telephone company for participation in) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 411.149 Tm 97 Tz (the Lifeline program.2) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 392.949 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Interested parties may file comments on or before November 4, 2011, and reply comments on) Tj 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.txt
  • 0 0 1 214.3 744.049 Tm 99 Tz 3 Tr /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (Federal Communications Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 481.65 743.799 Tm (DA 11-1682) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 708.049 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (invoice online but its service provider was 30 days late in certifying the invoice.5 USAC then issued the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 695.549 Tm (Form 472 \(BEAR\) Notification Letter that stated none of the funding for the submitted invoice was) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 682.85 Tm (disbursed.6 The letter did not say that the invoice was denied, only that "Invoice Received Date) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 670.149 Tm ([04/29/2009] Later Than."7 The letter also did not include any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.txt
  • 245.75 375.399 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (25,) Tj 1 0 0 1 262.05 375.149 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (2004, the Wireline Competition Bureau designated Nextel as) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 362.449 Tm 100 Tz (an ETC in several states, including, as relevant here, Alabama, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 349.949 Tm (Virginia.4 Sprint and Nextel merged to become Sprint Nextel in 2005.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 331.449 Tm 89 Tz (4.) Tj 1 0 0 1 141.8 331.25 Tm 99 Tz (Pursuant to section 214\(e\) of the Act, Sprint Nextel filed, on behalf of its affiliates,) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 318.549 Tm 100 Tz (notices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 258.699 291.849 Tm (More than a one or two sentence description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 279.399 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.45 278.949 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 266.699 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 254.199 Tm 93 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 228.5 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 215.799 Tm (Division,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.txt
  • number appears in the caption of this proceeding,) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.8 265.949 Tm 99 Tz (filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 240.5 Tm (Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 228.049 Tm 100 Tz (class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail.) Tj 1 0 0 1 267.1 227.549 Tm (All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 215.35 Tm 99 Tz (Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.1 189.649 Tm 100 Tz (All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.txt
  • materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 545.1 Tm 101 Tz (\(Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format\), send an e-mail to fcc504\(fcc.gov or call the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 532.349 Tm 99 Tz (Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at \(202\) 418-0530 \(voice\), \(202\) 418-0432 \(tty\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 506.899 Tm /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent to each of the following:) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 482.199 Tm 92 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (\(1\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.1 481.5 Tm 100 Tz (The Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, S.W., Room) Tj 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.txt
  • a non-facilities) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 318.049 Tm 110 Tz (based ETC for Lifeline-only support provided it fulfills the commitments in its Revised Compliance Plan) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 305.349 Tm 109 Tz (in each state where it is designated to provide Lifeline service, and otherwise is in compliance with the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 293.099 Tm (Act and Commission rules.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.1 274.35 Tm 99 Tz (2.) Tj 1 0 0 1 141.8 273.649 Tm 109 Tz (i-wireless is a non-facilities-based commercial mobile radio services provider) Tj 1 0 0 1 487.9 273.399 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (\(i.e.,) Tj 1 0 0 1 510.2 273.199 Tm 107 Tz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 303.649 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (or before December 13, 2011. All pleadings are to reference) Tj 1 0 0 1 346.8 303.399 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (WC Docket) Tj 1 0 0 1 404.4 303.149 Tm 102 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (No. 09-197. Comments may) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 290.949 Tm 100 Tz (be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System \(ECFS\) or by filing paper copies.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 230.899 Tm 91 Tz ('Petition by NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., d/b/a Viaero Wireless for Commission Agreement in Redefining Certain) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 219.399 Tm 90 Tz (Service Areas of Incumbent Rural Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.txt
  • designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on August 29, 2011.1 Cintex seeks) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 424.849 Tm (designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier for the limited purpose of offering Lifeline and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 412.099 Tm (Link-Up services in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, New Hampshire,) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 399.399 Tm 99 Tz (New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia.2) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.8 380.699 Tm (Interested parties may file) Tj 1 0 0 1 224.15 380.699 Tm /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (comments on or before November 29, 2011,) Tj 1 0 0 1 431.25 380.449 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (and) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.txt
  • 99 Tz (Service Administrative Company \(filed June 15,) Tj 1 0 0 1 266.85 437.049 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (2005\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 415.449 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (We also grant a waiver to Lower Merion because it missed the deadline for filing its appeal with the Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 404.199 Tm 102 Tz (by three days. Section) Tj 1 0 0 1 163.4 404.199 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.720) Tj 1 0 0 1 193.65 403.949 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Commission's rules provides parties with 60 days to appeal a decision by) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 392.399 Tm 101 Tz (USAC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.txt
  • Tm (every telecommunications carrier that provides interstate telecommunications services shall contribute, on) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 205.25 Tm (an equitable and nondiscriminatory basis, to the specific, predictable, and sufficient mechanisms) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 192.549 Tm 100 Tz (established by the Commission to preserve and advance universal service.4 Section 254\(d\) further) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 179.799 Tm 99 Tz (provides that any other provider of interstate telecommunications may be required to contribute "to the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 146.649 Tm 30 Tz /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (1) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.1 141.649 Tm 90 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (MeetingOne.com Corp. Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision, WC Docket No. 06-122)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.txt
  • in granting PlatinumTel's petition to forbear from) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 413.099 Tm 99 Tz (the requirement that carriers designated as eligible telecommunications carriers \(ETC5\) for purposes of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 400.599 Tm (federal universal service support provide services, at least in part, over their own facilities in order to) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 388.149 Tm 98 Tz (participate in the Lifeline program.2) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 369.399 Tm 100 Tz (Interested parties may file) Tj 1 0 0 1 224.15 368.699 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (comments on or before December 15, 2011, and reply comments on) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 356.699 Tm 102 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (or before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.txt
  • Tf (All) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 192.049 Tm 100 Tz (hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 179.549 Tm 101 Tz (before entering the building. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Commercial overnight mail) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 166.599 Tm 100 Tz (\(other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail\) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 120.25 Tm 91 Tz ('CAL Communications, Inc. Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 \(filed November 8, 2011\) \(Compliance) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 109 Tm 89 Tz (Plan\).) Tj 1 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.txt
  • waivers related to) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 197.549 Tm 92 Tz (such decisions, issued by USAC. Section) Tj 1 0 0 1 240.2 197.299 Tm 89 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (54.719\(c\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 281.75 197.049 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 185.799 Tm 90 Tz (by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.7 19\(c\). The E -) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 174.25 Tm (rate program is also known as the schools and libraries universal service mechanism.) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 157.449 Tm 57 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 463.2 175 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (20554.) Tj 1 0 0 1 496.3 174.75 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (All hand) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 162.299 Tm 100 Tz (deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 149.549 Tm 101 Tz (before entering the building. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Commercial overnight mail) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.1 123.849 Tm 91 Tz (Application for Review of Wirelme Competition Bureau Order by MeetingOne.com Corp., WC Docket No. 06-) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 112.349 Tm 88 Tz (1222 \(filed Dec.) Tj 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.txt
  • 1 90.45 465.649 Tm 100 Tz (Charles Tyler, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th) Tj 1 0 0 1 88.05 453.149 Tm (Street, S.W., Room 5-B521, Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: Charles.Tyler@fcc.gov.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 427.75 Tm (Filings and comments are also available for public inspection and copying during regular) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 415 Tm (business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room) Tj 1 0 0 1 503.25 415 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (CY-) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 402.299 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating) Tj 1 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.txt
  • 1 91.65 135.399 Tm 90 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (Request for Review at 1-2.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 114.049 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont5 10 Tf (See Electronic Filing ofDocuinents in Rulemaking Proceedings,) Tj 1 0 0 1 337.9 114 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 102.049 Tm 100 Tz (FCC Rcd 11322 \(1998\).) Tj ET endstream endobj 28 0 obj 5128 endobj 23 0 obj << /Dest [ 22 0 R /XYZ 0 792 null ] /Next 31 0 R /Parent 4 0 R /Prev 5 0 R /Title (page 2) >> endobj 32 0 obj << /BitsPerComponent 1 /ColorSpace /DeviceGray /DecodeParms << /Columns 2550
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 0 0 cm 612 0 0 792 0 0 cm /background_2 Do Q BT 0 0 0 rg 0 0 0 RG 1 0 0 1 214.05 743.549 Tm 99 Tz 3 Tr /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (Federal Communications Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 488.6 743.35 Tm 97 Tz (DA 11-864) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 707.799 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (providers for USF purposes are therefore not required to file the FCC Form 499-A, unless required to do) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 695.35 Tm (so by the Commission's rules governing contributions to other federal regulatory programs.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.05 669.85 Tm 87 Tz (3.) Tj 1 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.txt
  • 69.6 389.049 Tm (provider, or consortium that purchases directly from the service provider\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 373.199 Tm 51 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (5) Tj 1 0 0 1 78.7 367.5 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 356.199 Tm (Local Exchange Carriers, Transport Rate Structure and Pricing, End User C'ommon Line Charge,) Tj 1 0 0 1 467.75 355.949 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (CC Docket Nos.) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 344.649 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (96-45,) Tj 1 0 0 1 98.85 344.649 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (96-262, 94-1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.txt
  • 0 1 147.349 682.149 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C.) Tj 1 0 0 1 306.699 682.399 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (20554.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.1 656.95 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 644.2 Tm 99 Tz (\(Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format\), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 631.7 Tm (Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at \(202\) 418-0530 \(voice\), \(202\) 418-0432 \(tty\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 606.049 Tm /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.txt
  • Statistics \(BLS\), seeks access to certain) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 449.549 Tm (carrier revenue information for 2009 that the Commission collected from wireless carriers on FCC Form) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 436.849 Tm 100 Tz (499-A \(Form 499-A\).' In particular, BLS requests all data for 2009 that wireless carriers reported in) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 424.349 Tm (blocks 3 \(Carrier's Carrier Revenue Information\) and 4 \(End-User and Non-Telecommunications) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 411.649 Tm 99 Tz (Revenue Information, and Total Revenue and Uncollectible Revenue Information\) of that fonn.2) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 386.699 Tm 100 Tz (The Conunission collects revenue data on Form 499-A for purposes of determining the amounts) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.txt
  • Universal Service Administrative) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 183.85 Tm (Company Pursuant to Section 1.3, 32.18,) Tj 1 0 0 1 237.35 183.649 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (54.719) Tj 1 0 0 1 267.6 183.399 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (and 54.722 of the Commission's rules and Petition for Waiver of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 172.099 Tm (Section 32.27\(c\) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 \(filed Dec. 22, 2011\); 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 477.35 169.75 Tm 65 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 489.6 171.399 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont6 11 Tf (54.719\(c\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 160.599 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (\(Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 351.399 Tm (rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 340.099 Tm 101 Tz (Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.7 19\(c\). Section 54.407\(c\) of the Commission's rules maintains that E-rate funds shall) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 328.599 Tm 100 Tz (be available on a first-come-first-served basis, but requires USAC to implement an initial funding window that treats) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 316.849 Tm (all applicants filing within that window as if their applications were simultaneously received. 47 C.F.R. �) Tj 1 0 0 1 498.95 316.599 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.507\(c\).) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.txt
  • 0 1 191 377.099 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (applies here, and we remand the underlying applications to USAC to allow the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 364.599 Tm (applicants another opportunity to file their FCC Forms 486.) Tj 1 0 0 1 339.35 364.599 Tm (We also waive any Commission or USAC) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 351.899 Tm (procedural deadline, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary because the FCC Forms 486) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 339.149 Tm (of these applicants were initially rejected. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 326.449 Tm (expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application listed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.txt
  • (By the Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau:) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.8 412.599 Tm 78 Tz (1.) Tj 1 0 0 1 124.05 412.349 Tm 100 Tz (Consistent with the Wireline Competition Bureau's \(Bureau\) decision in the) Tj 1 0 0 1 463.4 411.899 Tm /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (Barrow County) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 399.649 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (School District Order,' we grant the appeal filed by Los Lunas School District \(Los Lunas\) of a decision) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 386.949 Tm (by the Universal Service Administrative Company \(USAC\) that denied funding from the E-rate program) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 374.449 Tm (for funding year 2008 because Los Lunas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 85.4 151.699 Tm 87 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 114.95 150.049 Tm 65 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 122.4 151.699 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (54.302.) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 128.449 Tm 87 Tz /OPBaseFont5 10 Tf (31d.) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 106.849 Tm 101 Tz (4See Electronic Filing ofDocuments in Rulemaking Proceedings,) Tj 1 0 0 1 337.65 106.599 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 95.049 Tm 100 Tz (FCC Rcd 11322 \(1998\).) Tj ET endstream endobj 26 0 obj 5884 endobj 21 0 obj << /Dest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.txt
  • to receive certain) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 427 Tm 111 Tz (forms of high-cost universal service support.' The Division has found that there is good cause to grant) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 414.299 Tm 110 Tz (the requested waivers because the missed deadlines were the result of minor ministerial, clerical, or) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 401.549 Tm 111 Tz (procedural errors. The Division also notes that all of the petitions were unopposed.2 These petitions and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 389.099 Tm 109 Tz (related information are listed below:) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.1 326.399 Tm 101 Tz (Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R.) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 253.65 543.649 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (UNIVERSAL) Tj 1 0 0 1 321.6 543.649 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (SERVICE RULES) Tj 1 0 0 1 253.65 518.2 Tm (WC Docket No. 10-90) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 493 Tm 102 Tz (Comment Date: February 23, 2012) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 480.049 Tm 100 Tz (Reply Comment Date: March 9, 2012) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 455.099 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request filed by the Vermont Public) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 442.349 Tm (Service Board \(VPSB\) for clarification of several aspects of the) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 69.35 491.8 Tm 101 Tz (Comment Date: February 6, 2012) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 479.099 Tm (Reply Comment Date: February 21, 2012) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 454.149 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request for review filed by UTEX) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 440.949 Tm 103 Tz (Communications Corp. \(UTEX\).' UTEX seeks review and reversal of a decision by the Universal) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 427.699 Tm 104 Tz (Service Administrative Company, which among other things, assessed late fees and penalties) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 414.5 Tm (associated with UTEX's 2009 FCC Form 499-A and rejected revisions to a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • 97-158 1997: 47 CFR �� 61.45, 61.47, 69.104, 69.126, 69.151, and 69.152. The following rules, or amendments thereto, shall be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register: 47 CFR �� 69.103, 69.107, 69.122, 69.303, and 69.304. The following rules, or amendments thereto, in this Report and Order shall be effective January 1, 1998: 47 CFR �� 61.3, 61.46, 69.1, 69.2, 69.105, 69.123, 69.124, 69.125, 69.154, 69.155, 69.157, 69.305, 69.306, 69.309, 69.401, 69.411, 69.502, and 69.611. The removal of the following sections is effective January 1, 1998: 47 CFR �� 69.201, 69.203, 69.204, 69.205, and 69.209. The following rules, which impose new or modified information or collection requirements, shall become effective upon approval by the Office of Management and Budget
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204983A1.txt
  • of clearing the band before they are required to do so likely will not be the "hard" costs of changing equipment or advertising their new channel but the "soft" costs of lost profits. 20880 Federal Communications Commission_________FCC 00-224 voluntary relocation agreements could facilitate clearing in the 700 MHz band by providing a replacement ("relocation") channel for incumbent broadcasters on Channels 59-69.1 8 88. In considering three-way transactions, we note that different considerations arise depending on whether the relocation channel is analog or digital. Where the relocation channel is analog, the lower band broadcaster who provides that channel would make an early transition to DTV operations, thus freeing up its analog channel to be used to relocate either an analog or digital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.txt
  • 61.6 4098.1275 6323.6675 437 G7DDT 62.4 4096.8675 6324.8825 1720 G7DDT 66.1 4078.935 6325.715 1720 G7DDT 69.3 4111.02 6331.9925 1720 G7DDT 68.6 3708.365 6333.95 1720 G7DDT 66.6 3737.75 6336.965 874 G7DDT 67.3 3764.22 6344.1 109 G7DDT 58.7 4090.9 6345.95 1720 G7DDT 60.1 4148.05 6359.5 437 G7DDT 57.9 4090.5 6363.8 218 G7DDT 54.4 4091.15 6366.1 1720 G7DDT 62.8 3898.4075 6062.5 27600 G7DDT 69.1 6123.4075 1720 G7DDT 62.6 6252.265 1060 G7DDT 64.5 6368.2 1720 G7DDT 65.3 109 G7DDT 4090.5 ======================================================================== ======= GOVERNMENT OF CANADA REQUESTS COORDINATION WITH USA SERVICE: FIXED SATELLITE CLASS OF STATION: FIXED EARTH STATION Licence #: 4856432 Location: DES LAURENTIDES (DLT-07A), QU Coordinates: 455640 N, 743200 W Ground Height (AMSL) / Antenna Height (AGL): 211 m / 9 m Antenna Diameter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231157A1.txt
  • Effective: 04/01/2001 TX Frequency (MHz) Bandwidth (kHz) Emissions EIRP (dBW) RX Frequency (MHz) 5855.06 1710 G7DDT 61.8 NA 5857.06 1710 G7DDT 57.7 NA 5858.86 1710 G7DDT 66.9 NA Licence: 4939434 (continued) TX Frequency (MHz) Bandwidth (kHz) Emissions EIRP (dBW) RX Frequency (MHz) 5860.46 1710 G7DDT 66.7 NA 5862.06 1710 G7DDT 66.4 NA 5865.66 1710 G7DDT 58.8 NA 5899.03 13900 G7DDT 69.1 NA 6082.20 1560 G7DDT 54.9 NA 6098.91 1430 G7DDT 62.8 NA 6112.81 51 G7DDT 59.2 NA 6204.25 15000 G7DDT 70.4 NA 6227.67 9620 G7DDT 61.8 NA 6224.12 23800 G7DDT 68.7 NA 6362.09 328 G7DDT 51.9 NA 6363.20 614 G7DDT 57.7 NA 6364.61 1750 G7DDT 58.3 NA 6366.64 1720 G7DDT 58.3 NA 6367.85 437 G7DDT 54.7 NA 6394.76 15000 G7DDT 79.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236019A1.txt
  • dBW/Hz Satellite Operating Arc: 30 to 33 W Satellite transmission VIA: INTELSAT 801 Date Effective: 04/01/2001 TX Frequency (MHz) Bandwidth (kHz) Emissions EIRP (dBW) RX Frequency (MHz) 5855.06 1710 G7DDT 61.8 NA 5857.06 1710 G7DDT 57.7 NA 5858.86 1710 G7DDT 66.9 NA 5860.46 1710 G7DDT 66.7 NA 5862.06 1710 G7DDT 66.4 NA 5865.66 1710 G7DDT 58.8 NA 5899.03 13900 G7DDT 69.1 NA 6082.20 1560 G7DDT 54.9 NA 6098.91 1430 G7DDT 62.8 NA 6112.81 51 G7DDT 59.2 NA 6204.25 15000 G7DDT 70.4 NA 6227.67 9620 G7DDT 61.8 NA 6224.12 23800 G7DDT 68.7 NA 6362.09 328 G7DDT 51.9 NA 6363.20 614 G7DDT 57.7 NA 6364.61 1750 G7DDT 58.3 NA 6366.64 1720 G7DDT 58.3 NA 6367.85 437 G7DDT 54.7 NA 6394.76 15000 G7DDT 79.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.txt
  • I 45.111 44.41 43.4 Longitude I -117.31 -1081 -81.2 42.3 30.11 31.9 27.8 30.9 32.94 39.94 -73.1 -82.2 -87.5 -97.7 -110 -113.6 -117 ITest points for 90 cm antenna I I I I I t I I Test points for 75 cm antenna Latitude 47.94 50.1 46.9 Longitude -118 -101 -83 ~~ 45.6 44.44 25.7 26.3 26.3 31.76 33.66 -71.9 -69.1 -80.5 -97.8 -99 -114.4 -115.7 Latitude Longitude ILongitude I -71.31 -67.41 -70.51 -78.31 -80.81 -99.71 -1161 -1171 -123.61 -120.81 47.11 46.4 46.4 45.1 43.94 26.9 29.6 26.8 30.44 33.11 -118.3 -93.3 -83.7 -75 -70.6 -81.3 -89.9 -98 -105.3 -115 22 I I I Test points for 1.2 m antenna Latitude 461 44.41 41.8 26.8 25.2 26.7 32.3 32.9 47.9 49.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.txt
  • I 45.111 44.41 43.4 Longitude I -117.31 -1081 -81.2 42.3 30.11 31.9 27.8 30.9 32.94 39.94 -73.1 -82.2 -87.5 -97.7 -110 -113.6 -117 ITest points for 90 cm antenna I I I I I t I I Test points for 75 cm antenna Latitude 47.94 50.1 46.9 Longitude -118 -101 -83 ~~ 45.6 44.44 25.7 26.3 26.3 31.76 33.66 -71.9 -69.1 -80.5 -97.8 -99 -114.4 -115.7 Latitude Longitude ILongitude I -71.31 -67.41 -70.51 -78.31 -80.81 -99.71 -1161 -1171 -123.61 -120.81 47.11 46.4 46.4 45.1 43.94 26.9 29.6 26.8 30.44 33.11 -118.3 -93.3 -83.7 -75 -70.6 -81.3 -89.9 -98 -105.3 -115 22 I I I Test points for 1.2 m antenna Latitude 461 44.41 41.8 26.8 25.2 26.7 32.3 32.9 47.9 49.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 2.6 2.9 3.7 6.2 8.5 5.5 7.5 5.8 5.5 4.2 -51.2 Jamaica 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.2 4.4 10.9 6.1 4.5 122.6 Japan 40.0 48.5 49.2 46.6 64.0 92.3 109.5 160.7 189.4 207.3 81.4 -11.7 Korea, Republic of 5.8 7.7 7.8 9.1 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 31.8 33.4 13.8 -21.6 Mexico 16.4 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 98.7 90.5 53.9 58.7 Morocco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 n.m. Netherlands 4.0 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 9.9 9.0 8.4 -43.7 Nigeria 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 5.8 4.7 4.61009.2 Pakistan 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 371.8 Peru 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
  • $3,157,046 64.9 2.2 22.0 10.6 0.2 $1,060,832 0.1 99.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 393,513,974 32.3 15.2 20.1 28.3 4.1 Italy $196,009,374 65.1 1.5 16.9 13.9 2.6 $6,350,304 50.6 0.2 20.5 27.6 1.1 $11,130,708 3.9 93.7 0.0 2.4 0.0 965,784,266 33.4 2.5 19.8 27.7 16.7 Liechtenstein $471,637 23.9 1.5 6.8 59.2 8.7 $0 $0 7,270,691 8.2 1.6 59.0 21.2 10.0 Luxembourg $5,118,046 69.1 1.2 15.5 12.6 1.7 $225,587 56.1 0.0 20.4 22.6 0.8 $74,766 1.8 0.0 0.8 97.4 0.0 33,435,294 57.2 1.8 26.0 11.9 3.1 Malta $3,098,774 46.5 7.0 17.8 17.5 11.2 $93,977 70.3 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.1 $394 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 22,608,801 29.0 10.5 27.6 17.8 15.1 Netherlands $111,368,352 66.1 0.8 14.5 16.4 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1,018 1,141 1,357 1,306 1,307 1,209 18.8 Italy n.a. n.a. 1,545 1,772 1,700 2,234 2,635 2,740 4,965 15,613 20,067 798.3 Jamaica n.a. n.a. 587 620 639 771 668 802 1,041 969 1,204 56.2 Japan n.a. n.a. 4,888 5,629 6,582 7,041 8,681 11,133 10,764 15,125 12,387 75.9 Korea, Republic of n.a. n.a. 1,143 1,492 2,246 2,299 2,678 2,858 2,807 3,037 3,887 69.1 Mexico n.a. n.a. 23,270 27,812 37,030 40,350 52,280 64,529 71,216 83,465 84,320 109.0 Morocco n.a. n.a. 91 89 113 115 112 114 114 113 142 23.5 Netherlands n.a. n.a. 1,224 1,073 1,179 2,087 1,831 3,401 3,497 3,012 5,247 151.4 Nigeria n.a. n.a. 232 208 232 294 364 365 303 333 454 54.4 Pakistan n.a. n.a. 268 329 269 300 305
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 97.0 98.9 97.4 93.9 93.4 92.1 93.3 92.6 92.4 92.3 94.7 95.1 93.2 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 6.11 6 - 55 Table 6.11 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 97.0 98.9 97.4 93.9 93.4 92.1 93.3 92.6 92.4 92.3 94.7 95.1 93.2 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 6.11 6 - 55 Table 6.11 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 88.8 95.4 95.2 104.0 67.0 80.9 92.4 December 89.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
  • 21.8 20.0 39.8 14.9 3.5 $2,247,346 23.8 12.1 43.6 1.0 19.5 $142,127 0.0 85.5 14.5 0.0 0.0 128,415,442 13.3 27.8 50.5 3.0 5.4 Paraguay $8,382,654 56.8 10.2 7.7 12.9 12.3 $425,289 53.6 0.0 25.7 7.9 12.8 $3,172 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 75.9 58,762,072 50.9 10.9 12.6 11.4 14.3 Peru $66,252,540 9.8 34.9 31.6 12.9 10.7 $2,729,536 4.2 3.0 9.1 14.6 69.1 $570,734 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 56.7 1,219,159,159 3.1 52.8 20.0 3.8 20.2 Suriname $8,123,564 72.8 1.6 21.4 2.9 1.3 $237,342 28.0 0.0 40.9 0.0 31.1 $579 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 98.1 46,497,394 63.4 1.0 32.9 0.8 1.9 Uruguay $11,910,976 41.3 24.4 12.6 16.8 4.9 $741,286 38.1 0.0 13.6 10.4 37.9 $25,733 0.0 41.2 0.2 50.3 8.3 108,880,900 31.8 33.6 12.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.txt
  • 91.1 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1 81.3 41.6 63.3 74.3 July 73.3 83.1 94.7 80.9 42.1 61.5 72.1 August 74.1 84.1 96.9 81.5 42.3 62.0 72.4 September 73.8 83.0 96.9 78.8 41.4 62.8 72.8 October 69.7 77.1 96.8 63.6 39.4 60.7 71.1 November 71.4 80.9 96.4 74.9 38.3 60.2 69.8 December 70.7 80.9 95.7 75.4 38.5 58.6 69.1 2003January 70.0 79.9 95.6 73.0 38.2 58.3 68.5 February 70.4 79.7 87.4 81.2 37.2 59.2 68.9 March 70.2 79.8 87.4 81.6 37.0 58.7 67.9 April 69.4 78.2 86.9 78.2 35.6 58.9 68.7 May 69.8 79.5 87.1 82.2 34.4 58.3 67.1 June 69.7 78.9 87.1 80.7 33.8 58.7 68.3 July 69.8 79.4 86.9 81.3 36.3 58.4 67.0 August 69.9 79.5 86.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 91.1 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • 91.1 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February* 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.9 82.5 63.5 March* 85.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.txt
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.6 82.5 63.5 March 85.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.txt
  • 83.9 422.2 764.1 41.9 MD Massachusetts 2,495.3 134.5 2,360.9 1,461.9 899.0 308.4 81.5 474.8 864.7 34.3 MA Michigan 3,256.9 360.9 2,895.9 2,050.8 845.1 326.5 99.9 384.7 811.1 34.0 MI Minnesota 1,131.5 46.8 1,084.7 662.4 422.2 101.3 43.6 237.4 382.3 39.9 MN Mississippi 1,063.4 48.5 1,014.9 745.2 269.7 103.4 39.0 107.0 249.4 20.3 MS Missouri 2,277.6 357.6 1,920.0 1,275.2 644.8 213.1 69.1 324.3 606.5 38.3 MO Montana 256.4 24.9 231.5 148.7 82.8 27.7 11.1 34.8 73.6 9.3 MT Nebraska 545.1 41.2 503.9 325.4 178.5 49.2 23.4 95.2 167.8 10.7 NE Nevada 777.8 89.8 688.0 434.5 253.5 93.9 43.4 106.1 243.4 10.1 NV New Hampshire 452.6 19.0 433.6 265.0 168.6 60.4 19.5 82.5 162.4 6.3 NH New Jersey 3,600.4 209.1 3,391.3 1,993.1 1,398.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1 81.3 41.6 63.3 74.3 July 73.3 83.1 94.7 80.9 42.1 61.5 72.1 August 74.1 84.1 96.9 81.5 42.3 62.0 72.4 September 73.8 83.0 96.9 78.8 41.4 62.8 72.8 October 69.7 77.1 96.8 63.6 39.4 60.7 71.1 November 71.4 80.9 96.4 74.9 38.3 60.2 69.8 December 70.7 80.9 95.7 75.4 38.5 58.6 69.1 2003January 70.0 79.9 95.6 73.0 38.2 58.3 68.5 February 70.4 79.7 87.4 81.2 37.2 59.2 68.9 March 70.2 79.8 87.4 81.6 37.0 58.7 67.9 April 69.4 78.2 86.9 78.2 35.6 58.9 68.7 May 69.8 79.5 87.1 82.2 34.4 58.3 67.1 June 69.7 78.9 87.1 80.7 33.8 58.7 68.3 July 69.8 79.4 86.9 81.3 36.3 58.4 67.0 August 69.9 79.5 86.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.6 82.5 63.5 March 85.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.txt
  • ending December 31, 2007, advanced services lines increased 34% from 59.8 million to 80.2 million (or 20.4 million lines). Of the 80.2 million advanced services lines reported as of December 31, 2007, 56.4% were at least 2.5 mbps in the faster direction and 43.5% were slower than 2.5 mbps in the faster direction. Of the 80.2 million advanced services lines, 69.1 million served primarily residential end users. Cable modem service represented 50.7% of these lines while 32.6% were ADSL connections, 0.1% were SDSL or traditional wireline connections, 2.4% were fiber connections to the end user premises, and 14.1% used other types of technology including satellite, terrestrial fixed or mobile wireless (on a licensed or unlicensed basis), and electric power line. Geographic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.txt
  • 0.0 11.0 89.0 $61,331 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 171,636,345 0.1 30.3 2.7 14.3 52.7 Iraq $24,796,439 0.0 17.5 0.9 6.4 75.2 $530,878 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $10,028 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 79,920,941 0.0 26.5 3.7 20.2 49.6 Israel $46,713,582 0.0 17.6 0.8 16.6 65.0 $3,689,923 0.0 36.4 0.0 11.7 51.9 $816,709 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 875,683,610 0.0 13.5 1.2 16.2 69.1 Jordan $7,291,668 0.0 38.6 1.2 15.7 44.5 $316,528 0.0 12.5 0.0 25.6 61.8 $1,183,377 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 85,532,194 0.0 22.0 2.6 29.8 45.6 Kuwait $13,698,850 0.1 22.8 2.0 17.2 57.9 $315,445 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 89.2 $19,653 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 124,067,925 0.2 22.1 3.2 27.2 47.3 Lebanon $34,010,536 0.0 13.5 20.3 42.7 23.4 $328,507 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
  • 72.5 70.1 84.6 63.1 129.2 Troubles Found per Thousand Lines 172.5 120.6 256.8 265.4 95.0 88.1 154.8 150.1 208.5 Repeat Troubles as a Pct. of Trouble Rpts. 11.5% 10.6% 21.1% 15.1% 20.2% 11.5% 19.3% 17.4% 21.9% Residential Complaints per Million Res. Access Lines 900.1 308.2 674.8 325.4 52.3 58.3 48.4 273.9 335.1 Business Complaints per Million Bus. Access Lines 215.2 69.1 120.8 103.5 12.2 24.8 0.0 31.2 100.1 * Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications Table 2(b): Switch Downtime & Trunk Blocking Non-Mandatory Price-Cap Company Comparison -- 2008 CenturyCincinnatiCitizens Citizens EmbarqHawaiian Iowa WindstreamWindstream Tel. Frontier TelecomTelecom Alltel Valor Total Access Lines in Thousands 498 705 1,034 594 5,688 493 193 636 433 Total Trunk Groups 299 44 244
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
  • 72.5 70.1 84.6 63.1 129.2 Troubles Found per Thousand Lines 172.5 120.6 256.8 265.4 95.0 88.1 154.8 150.1 208.5 Repeat Troubles as a Pct. of Trouble Reports 11.5% 10.6% 21.1% 15.1% 20.2% 11.5% 19.3% 17.4% 21.9% Res. Complaints per Mill. Res. Access Lines 900.1 308.2 674.8 325.4 52.3 58.3 48.4 273.9 335.1 Bus. Complaints per Mill. Bus. Access Lines 215.2 69.1 120.8 103.5 12.2 24.8 0.0 31.2 100.1 NA: Not available Table 9.1 (b) Installation, Maintenance, & Customer Complaints Other Price-Cap Companies - 2008 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 7 AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T Qwest Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech BellSouth PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Total Access Lines in Thousands 11,627 15,519 12,254 10,034
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.6 82.5 63.5 March 85.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.6 82.5 63.5 March 85.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • 81.9 41.8 27.3 19.6 Louisiana 87.6 81.1 28.5 20.0 14.0 Maine 86.8 79.7 54.4 36.3 7.3 Maryland 86.6 74.5 47.4 39.8 33.9 Massachusetts 89.0 77.9 50.1 44.0 36.1 Michigan 86.2 74.9 42.0 33.8 10.1 Minnesota 89.6 78.4 44.7 37.9 20.0 Mississippi 91.7 62.8 22.5 11.4 3.2 Missouri 88.9 80.8 34.1 22.7 6.4 Montana 76.5 53.5 31.6 25.7 2.4 Nebraska 84.6 69.1 43.7 29.3 17.2 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 42 27 Table 20 - Continued Percentage of Connections by Downstream Speed by State as of December 31, 2010 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over 200 kbps Upstream and State % over 200 kbps Downstream % at least 768 kbps
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-206A1.txt
  • v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 556, 594, 602, �� 88, 108 (1998); Infonxx, Inc. v. New York Tel. Co., FCC 97-359, File No. E-96-26, 1997 WL 621592, � 16 (1997); Beehive Tel., Inc. v. Bell Operating Companies, 10 FCC Rcd 10562, 10566, �� 23-24 (1995), affirmed after voluntary remand, 12 FCC Rcd 17930 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.1, et seq. In the Access Charge Reform Docket, we acknowledged that CLEC access rates may ``be higher due to the CLECs' high start-up costs for building new networks, their small geographical service areas, and the limited number of subscribers over which CLECs can distribute costs.'' Access Charge Reform, Fifth Report and Order and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.txt
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. These rules tell the incumbent LECs the precise manner in which they may assess interstate access charges on interexchange carriers and end users. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels incumbents may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47 C.F.R. �� 65.1 - 65.830 (relating to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-181A1.txt
  • Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 261 (1946). United States v. Commodities Trading Corp., 339 U.S. at 124. United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. at 373. United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 374 (1942). Id. at 374; United States v. Commodities Trading Corp., 339 U.S. at 123. Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. V. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 476, 486 (1984). United States v. 69.1 Acres of Land, 942 F.2d 290, 294 (4th Cir. 1991). Seravalli, et al. v. United States, 845 F.2d 1571, 1574-1575 (Fed. Cir. 1988). As Complainant points out, the majority of states that have certified to regulate pole attachment rates rely on an historic cost methodology. Complainant cites Cal. Pub. Util. Code � 767.5 (1999); Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-185A1.txt
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. Finally, Part 61 requires ILECs to publish their rates in tariffs, and the rules restrict how and when incumbents may change their rates. See 47 C.F.R. �� 61.1 - 61.193. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels ILECs may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.txt
  • service. The LRN is a unique ten-digit number assigned to each central office switch to identify each switch in the network for call routing purposes. Id. Carriers use telephone numbers for many other access-related services such as billing, maintenance, administration, and various forms of record keeping. See Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 10384, para. 138. See generally, 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. See First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7625, para. 122. See LNP Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11726-27, para. 41 (citing LNP First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8419-20). See id. See id. at 11727, para. 43 (citing LNP First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8420-21). See id. at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-161A1.txt
  • associated with regulated telecommunications services and those associated with nonregulated activities, 47 C.F.R. �� 64.901- 64.904; determine the fraction of regulated expenses and investment that should be allocated to the interstate jurisdiction, 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1- 36.741; and then translate these interstate costs into charges for specific interstate access services according to part 69 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.731. See Rate-of-Return Access Charge Reform Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 19624, para. 19. See Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6786 (1990) (LEC Price Cap Order). See LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6787, para. 2. Id. See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12967,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.txt
  • refiled complaints for administrative convenience. See Letter from Radhika V. Karmarkar, Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to all counsel, File Nos. EB-02-MD-018 - 030 (rel. May 1, 2002) (``May 1, 2002 Letter Ruling'') at 5. 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c). Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996) (the ``Act''). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. (1987 - 1997). Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references to Part 69 of the Commission's rules refer to the rules in effect prior to April 15, 1997. ``Citizens'' refers collectively to Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company, Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company of California, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • group tend to have a relatively higher monthly rate and number of channels, and a relatively lower rate per channel. Table 4. Competitive Differential by System Size� Group Average Monthly Rate�� Number of Channels Rate per Channel Large Medium Small Large Medium Small Large Medium Small Noncompetitive $41.53 $40.26 $37.13 67.3 63.2 50.3 $0.625 $0.651 $0.792 Competitive $40.17 $39.34 $31.91 69.1 61.9 46.7 $0.592 $0.651 $0.780 Differential 3.4% 2.3% 16.4% -2.6% 1.3% 3.6% 5.6% 0.0% 1.5% � Large systems have greater than 50,000 subscribers, medium systems have between 10,001 and 50,000 subscribers, and small systems have 10,000 or less subscribers. �� Including programming and equipment. For the competitive group, Table 5 divides the monthly average rate from Table 3 into BST,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.txt
  • Third, the separations rules determine the fraction of the incumbent carrier's regulated expenses and investment that should be allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1-36.741. After the total amount of interstate cost is identified, the access charge rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.731. Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 15992-93, para. 24 (1997) (Access Charge Reform First Report and Order). Access Charge Reform First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16013, para. 77 (``Because common line costs do not vary with usage, these costs should be recovered on a flat-rated instead of per-minute
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.txt
  • 9656, para. 128. See supra para. 100. See supra para. 106. See supra para. 94. See supra paras. 127-33. See supra paras. 139-40. See supra paras. 141-43. 47 CFR � 32.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 36.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 51.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 54.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 61.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 69.1 et seq. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, CC Docket No. 01-92, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 9610 (2001) (Intercarrier Compensation NPRM); Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 05-33 (rel. Mar. 3, 2005)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-79A1.txt
  • NPRM Comments at 5; Qwest NPRM Reply Comments at 20-22; Sprint NPRM Comments at 15-16. See 47 U.S.C. �� 160(a), 254(d); Universal Service FNPRM, 17 FCC Rcd 3752 (2002). See 47 U.S.C. � 160(a)(1). See 47 U.S.C. � 160(a)(2). See 47 U.S.C. � 160(a)(3). See 47 U.S.C. � 160(b). GCI Emergency Petition Comments at 10-11. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. In addition to access charge obligations, we agree with APCC that providers of calling cards are obligated to pay dial-around compensation to payphone service providers pursuant to section 276 of the Act when the cards are used in the provision of telecommunications services. See APCC Comments at 11-12. AT&T NPRM Reply Comments at 9-10. IDT NPRM Comments at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.txt
  • and any such charge, practice, classification or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful.'' Complaint at 4, � 4; Joint Statement, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed June 6, 2007) (``Joint Statement'') at 1, � 2. Joint Statement at 1-2, � 4. Joint Statement at 2, � 5. Joint Statement at 1-2, � 4. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.2. Complaint at 6, � 8; Answer of Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Company, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed May 29, 2007) (``Answer'') at 12, � 8. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601-69.612. Complaint at 6-7, � 9; Answer at 12, � 9; see 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(d). Complaint at 6-7, � 9; Answer at 12, � 9; see 47 C.F.R. �� 69.604,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.txt
  • of the assignment application and consummation of the sale. Market Concentration Nameloc and Arkansas assert that the Staff Decision failed to give full consideration to market concentration concerns. Arkansas contends that the staff did not address ``specific evidence of market failure - namely, that two firms [Citadel Communications Corp. and Clear Channel Communications] in the Little Rock market presently control 69.1 percent of the market's advertising revenue.'' Arkansas asserts that such market concentration rises to the standard of the ``50/70 screen'' then used by the staff to ``flag'' applications with possible concentration issues. Arkansas appears to conclude from these facts that a hearing is needed to determine whether anti-competitive market conditions and the loss of a female/minority-owned station warrant a denial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.txt
  • 97 FCC 2d at 735-40, paras. 129-34, 137-43. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.301-.502; see also Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6786, 6787, para. 1 (1990) (LEC Price Cap Order). The rate-of-return regulations are set forth in Part 69 of our rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-701. Price cap regulation was mandatory for the BOCs and GTE and optional for other incumbent local exchange carriers. See LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6818-20, paras. 257-79; see also Access Charge Reform; Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchanges Carriers; Interexchange Carrier Purchases of Switch Access Services Offered by Competitive Local Exchange Carriers; Petition of U.S. West
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • Census Blocks POPs Contained in Rural Census Blocks % of Total U.S. POPs Square Miles Contained in Those Blocks % of Total U.S. Square Miles Total for Rural U.S. 4,169,790 60,836,650 21.3% 3,367,687 88.6% % of Total Rural U.S. POPs % of Total Rural U.S. Square Miles 1 or More 3,539,318 56,991,088 93.7 1,788,137 53.1 2 or More 2,212,589 42,024,607 69.1 855,268 25.4 3 or More 904,648 23,158,908 38.1 222,982 6.6 4 or More 295,099 10,509,664 17.3 52,305 1.6 Mobile Broadband Coverage in Rural Areas ). shows that non-rural CMAs generally have more providers offering service than rural CMAs. For instance, 16 percent of rural CMAs have only two providers offering service in at least some part of the CMA, whereas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Rural Census Blocks POPs Contained in Rural Census Blocks % of Total U.S. POPsSquare Miles Contained in Those Blocks % of Total U.S. Square Miles Total for Rural U.S. 4,169,790 60,836,650 21.3% 3,367,687 88.6% % of Total Rural U.S. POPs % of Total Rural U.S. Square Miles 1 or More 3,539,318 56,991,088 93.7 1,788,137 53.1 2 or More 2,212,589 42,024,607 69.1 855,268 25.4 3 or More 904,648 23,158,908 38.1 222,982 6.6 4 or More 295,099 10,509,664 17.3 52,305 1.6 Chart 49 Mobile Broadband Coverage in Rural Areas 98.5% 91.9% 81.7% 67.8% 93.7% 69.1% 38.1% 17.3% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 1 or more 2 or more 3 or more 4 or more Number of Providers Percentage of PopulationCovered Total U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.txt
  • (paid on long distance calls within a state). See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.301-.502; see also Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6786, 6787, para. 1 (1990) (LEC Price Cap Order). The rate-of-return regulations are set forth in Part 69 of our rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-701. See, e.g., Digital Crossroads 10-15. 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152(a), 154(i). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. Part 36. In the 1980's, the Commission adopted a rule allocating a fixed amount-25%-of loop cost to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. � 36.154(c). Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6786,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • the voice call signaling and transmission technology used by the carrier or VoIP provider. * * * * * PART 69-ACCESS CHARGES The authority citation for part 69 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403. 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403. Add paragraph (d) to �69.1 to read as follows: �69.1 Application of access charges. * * * * * (d) To the extent any provision contained in part 51 subparts H and J conflict with any provision of this part, the part 51 provision supersedes the provision of this part. * * * * * Revise �69.3paaragraphs (e)(6) and (e)(9) and add paragraph (e)(12) to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-164A1.txt
  • Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (17625,) Tj 1 0 0 1 144.45 132.75 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (para. 9;) Tj 1 0 0 1 177.35 132.75 Tm /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Federal-State Joint Conference on Advanced Telecommunications Services,) Tj 1 0 0 1 486.45 132.5 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (CC Docket) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 120.75 Tm 100 Tz (No. 99-294, Order, 18 FCC Rcd) Tj 1 0 0 1 202.05 121 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (27065,) Tj 1 0 0 1 232.05 121 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (27066 para.) Tj 1 0 0 1 282.449 120.75 Tm 77 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (5) Tj 1 0 0 1 290.15 121
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.txt
  • 95 Tz (for its contracts.3) Tj 1 0 0 1 149.5 317.099 Tm 100 Tz (USAC further found that Houston ISD had met with ACS during the bidding period) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 304.599 Tm (and accepted gifis from ACS.4 Upon review of the record, we find that Houston ISD and ACS violated) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 291.899 Tm (the Commission's competitive bidding rules, and that E-rate funds should not have been committed or) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 279.149 Tm 99 Tz (disbursed to ACS or its successors, including Lakehills.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 324.7 278.949 Tm 100 Tz (We therefore affirm USAC's decision to rescind) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 266.449 Tm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 69.35 312.5 Tm 99 Tz (June 7, 2010\) \(Application for Review\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 299.549 Tm 56 Tz (2) Tj 1 0 0 1 76.049 295 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Universal Service Contribution Methodology; Request for Review by in Contact, Inc. of a Decision by Universal) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 283.449 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Service Administrator, 25 FCC Rcd 4739 \(Wireline Comp. Bur. 2010\) \(Order\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 265.699 Tm (Petition for Special Relief and Waiver by inContact, Inc. of a Decision of Universal Service Administrator \(filed) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 254.199 Tm 100 Tz (Apr. 13, 2009\). Although inContact framed its
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • Basic cable television subscribership grew from 66.1 million subscribers at the end of 1998 to 67.3 million subscribers at the end of 1999, an increase of 1.8 percent. It continued to grow to an estimated 67.7 million subscribers by June 30, 2000, a six month increase of approximately 0.6 percent. Basic cable penetration grew between 1998 and 1999, increasing from 69.1 percent at the end of 1998 to 69.7 percent at the end of 1999. Basic cable penetration remained unchanged at 69.7 percent at the end of the first half of 2000. The percentage of TV households subscribing to cable continued to increase, rising to 67.3 percent of all TV households by the end of 1999, and to 67.4 percent by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf
  • the cost recovery mechanism for long-term local number portability (LNP) administration.4 Carriers and certain other providers of telecommunications services must satisfy these various requirements by filing different forms or worksheets, containing similar but not identical information, at different times, at different intervals, and in different locations. 1 47 C.F.R. �� 64.601 et seq. 2 47 C.F.R. �� 54.1 et seq., 69.1 et seq. 3 47 C.F.R. �� 52.1 et seq. 4 47 C.F.R. �� 52.21 et seq. 2 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-233 2. Our existing multiple filing requirements impose real burdens on affected parties -- burdens that we can significantly reduce by combining current contributor reporting worksheets into one unified Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet. Besides benefiting reporting entities, adopting a single
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98106.pdf
  • actual voice-grade minutes of use, geographically averaged on a study-area-wide basis, that the incumbent Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-106 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-106 47 C.F.R. � 69.111(c)(1) (emphasis added). 222 See e.g., Access Reform Tariffs Designation Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 2276. 223 Id. at 2278. 224 Id. at 2279. 225 47 C.F.R. � 69.111(c). 226 47 C.F.R. � 69.1(c). 227 Access Reform Tariffs Designation Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 2279. 228 52 local exchange carrier experiences based on the prior year's annual use." 222 129. The majority of the price cap LECs' tariff filings revealed that tandem usage in their study areas exceeded 9,000 minutes per trunk for 1996. The recalculated transport rates for the price cap 223 LECs
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • 834 (1984). These rules are referred to as the Uniform System of Accounts and are contained in Part 32 of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 32.1-.9000. This is governed by sections 64.901-.904 of our Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 64.901-.904. This step is governed by Part 36 of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1-.741. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.731. The general process of separating these costs between the interstate and intrastate jurisdictions is discussed by the Supreme Court in Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133 (1930). See, e.g., Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 16010-11 (1997) (Access Charge Reform Order), aff'd sub. nom., Southwestern Bell v. FCC,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. These rules tell the incumbent LECs the precise manner in which they may assess interstate access charges on interexchange carriers and end users. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels incumbents may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47 C.F.R. �� 65.1 - 65.830 (relating to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.wp
  • a reference from one document to another. On the World Wide Web, a user can select a link on one page and "jump" to a second page referenced by that link. Telemessaging/Electronic Publishing Order, at para. 46 n.114, citing Wired Style: Principles of English Usage in the Digital Age (Hale ed., 1996) at 49-50. Id. 260 See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. (Part 69). The Part 69 rules are designed to be consistent with the Commission's jurisdictional separations rules that govern the allocation of incumbent LECs' expenses and investment between the interstate and state jurisdictions. See Part 36 of the Commission's Rules; 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 et seq. 261 MTS and WATS Market Structure, Docket No. 78-72, Memorandum Opinion and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.txt
  • they are not considered to be ``telecommunications carriers.'' Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 12 FCC Rcd 8776, �� 788-90 (1997). Pursuant to section 251(a) of the 1996 Act, all telecommunications carriers must ``interconnect directly or indirectly with the facilities and equipment of other telecommunications carriers.'' Section 251(c)(2) imposes additional interconnection obligations on incumbent LECs. See generally 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. MTS and WATS Market Structure, 97 FCC 2d 682, 711-22 (1983). Downes, Thomas and Shane Greenstein, ``Do Commercial ISPs Provide Universal Access,'' (Dec. 1998), available at http://skew2.kellogg.nwu.edu/~greenste/research/papers/tprcbook.pdf. POP stands for Point of Presence and refers to the number of local nodes for dial-up access that the ISP has deployed. Although business telephone lines may feature metered usage rates
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209958-1.pdf
  • YES Volume Control Resets when placed YES YES NO back on-hook? Employs conventional circuitry? ? ? El Figure 1: Comparison of Tested Units Note 1. Sample "C" is 6 dB quieter than nominal at the minimum volume control. PARAMETER SAMPLE "A- SAMPLE `B" SAMPLE `C" Noise at Minimum 41.4 46.7 31.0 < 40 dB SPL (A) Noise at Maximum 64.1 69.1 56.6 (No Spec.) dB SPL (A) Transmit Loudness (TOLR) -45.6 -46.6 -44.1 -48 +8, -5 dB ROLR Loudness at Minimum 42.3 43.5 52.0 +46 f 5 dB ROLR Loudness at Maximum 22.9 25.2 28.5 dB SPL Level at Minimum 95.5 96.9 87.7 dB SPL (1 kHz) SPL Level at Maximum 116.2 115.7 111.5 dB SPL (1 kHz) Volume Control Range
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210007-2.pdf
  • Spec.) dB SPL (A) Transmit Loudness (TOLR) -48 +8, -5 dB ROLR Loudness at Minimum +46+5dB ROLR Loudness at Maximum dB SPL Level at Minimum dB SPL (1 kHz) SPL Level at Maximum dB SPL (1 kHz) Volume Control Range Calculated using ROLR Proposed > 20 dB Volume Control Range Calculated using SPL Proposed > 20 dB 41.4 46.7 64.1 69.1 -45.6 -46.6 42.3 43.5 22.9 25.2 95.5 96.9 116.2 115.7 19.4 18.3 20.7 18.8 Figure2: Summary of Measurements 31 .o 56.6 -44.1 52.0 28.5 87.7 111.5 23.5 23.9 - 2.5 - Note: Since ROLR and TOLR are calculated using losses the more neaative the ROLR or TOLR the louder the telephone. - 26 - SAMPLE "A" Volume Control Range -1;/1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22497, 22555 (1998); Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 01-78 (rel. Mar. 7, 2001). See Appendix A for a list of the parties. 47 U.S.C. � 201(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references are to the 2000 edition. We refer to prior C.F.R. editions in instances where the prior rules were different than the current rules. C.F. Communications Corp., et al. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Remand, 15 FCC Rcd 8759 (2000) (``Liability Order''); recon. denied, 15
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01185.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01185.html
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. Finally, Part 61 requires ILECs to publish their rates in tariffs, and the rules restrict how and when incumbents may change their rates. See 47 C.F.R. �� 61.1 - 61.193. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels ILECs may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1890A1.html
  • al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098, 1109 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3671, 5. See also Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2225, 2226 (EB 2002), at 3 (``Second Waiver Order''). 5 Second Waiver Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 2226, 3. 6
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-259A1.html
  • the Secretary of the Commission shall cause to have this Order published in the Federal Register. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint. 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 2 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 3 See C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97- 1202, slip. op (D.C. Cir. 1997); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc. et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 7334, 7335-36 (1993); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc.,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
  • complaints for administrative convenience. See Letter from Radhika V. Karmarkar, Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to all counsel, File Nos. EB-02-MD- 018 - 030 (rel. May 1, 2002) (``May 1, 2002 Letter Ruling'') at 5. 2 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c). Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996) (the ``Act''). 3 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. (1987 - 1997). Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references to Part 69 of the Commission's rules refer to the rules in effect prior to April 15, 1997. 4 ``Citizens'' refers collectively to Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company, Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company of California,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2000A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1450A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2865A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. f/k/a South Central Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-023 (filed January 14, 2004). Because the Commission order assessing liability in this case was on appeal to the D.C. Circuit at the time this motion was filed, we deferred ruling
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2866A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a TDS Telcom, Communications Corporation of Indiana d/b/a TDS Telcom, and Home Telephone Company of Pittsboro, Inc., Supplement to Formal complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-025 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3167A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3476A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3477A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2. Communications Vending corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-029 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Payphone Systems v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-4022A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1972A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3 Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed April 11, 2005). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1974A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-022 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Notice of Settlement
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1975A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB- 02-MD-028 (filed April 26, 2002). 3 NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-028 (filed May 17, 2005). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1976A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD- 021 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3 Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3072A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety and the proceedings ARE TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation f/k/a US West Communications, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-019 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); IMR Capital Corporation v. Verizon New England, Inc. f/k/a New England Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-020 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Verizon North, Inc.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-674A1.html
  • (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back for statute of limitations purposes to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8; Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2115 (EB 2002) (``Second Waiver Order''); Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • and any such charge, practice, classification or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful." Complaint at 4, P: 4; Joint Statement, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed June 6, 2007) ("Joint Statement") at 1, P: 2. Joint Statement at 1-2, P: 4. Joint Statement at 2, P: 5. Joint Statement at 1-2, P: 4. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.1-69.2. Complaint at 6, P: 8; Answer of Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Company, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed May 29, 2007) ("Answer") at 12, P: 8. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.601-69.612. Complaint at 6-7, P: 9; Answer at 12, P: 9; see 47 C.F.R. S: 69.3(d). Complaint at 6-7, P: 9; Answer at 12, P: 9; see 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.604,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-5A1.html
  • the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19975, 19990, P: 32 (2003); see also Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc. v. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., 423 F.3d 1056, 1067-70 (9th Cir. 2005) (and Commission orders cited therein), aff'd, Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., 550 U.S. 45 (2007). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. S: 203; 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.1 - 69.731; see n.32, supra. See generally 2001 CLEC Access Charge Reform Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 9957 (stating that "our tariff rules were historically intended to protect purchasers of service from monopoly providers, not to protect sellers from monopsony purchasing power"); In the Matter of Communique Telecommunications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 13635, 13649, P: 26
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00206.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00206.txt
  • v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 556, 594, 602, �� 88, 108 (1998); Infonxx, Inc. v. New York Tel. Co., FCC 97-359, File No. E-96-26, 1997 WL 621592, � 16 (1997); Beehive Tel., Inc. v. Bell Operating Companies, 10 FCC Rcd 10562, 10566, �� 23-24 (1995), affirmed after voluntary remand, 12 FCC Rcd 17930 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.1, et seq. In the Access Charge Reform Docket, we acknowledged that CLEC access rates may ``be higher due to the CLECs' high start-up costs for building new networks, their small geographical service areas, and the limited number of subscribers over which CLECs can distribute costs.'' Access Charge Reform, Fifth Report and Order and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
  • 93.9 Mar-00 30 37 18 14 34.262.390.6 Mar-01 30 35 16 14 40.266.890.9 Milwaukee - Racine Mar-96 28 34 22 16 27.5 n/a 68.5 Nov-97 29 35 17 16 30.4n/a 81.1 Nov-98 31 35 16 16 29.7 n/a 80.2 Mar-00 31 35 16 17 23.446.276.1 Mar-01 31 35 15 17 27.651.286.5 San Antonio TX Mar-96 34 33 16 13 23.7n/a 69.1 Nov-97 34 33 16 14 28.8n/a 81.5 Nov-98 34 34 17 12 32.6 n/a 85.1 Mar-00 32 38 20 12 30.750.682.4 Mar-01 32 39 18 11 32.652.083.3 Middlesex-Somerset-Union NJ Mar-96n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nov-97n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nov-98n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mar-00n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mar-01 33 5
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033c.pdf
  • 601 Schedule I Supplement 4 Frequency Data Transmitter Location Information 1) Transmit Location Name: KNOBHILL 2) Path Number: 1 Frequency Information 3) Action A/M/D 4) Lower or Center Frequency (MHZ) 5) Upper Frequency (MHZ) 6) Tolerance (%) 7) EIRP (dBm) 8 Emission Designator 9) Digital Modulation Rate (kbps) 10) Digital Modulation Type Existing (if mod) A New 7112.5 71177112711 0.00200 69.1 20M0D7W 976.8 64 QAM 11) Transmitter Manufacturer 12) Transmitter Model 13) Automatic Transmitter Power Control RADIOCOMM INC ABC- 12345A Y 3) Action A/M/D 4) Lower or Center Frequency (MHz) 5) Upper Frequency (MHz) 6) Tolerance (%) 7) EIRP (dBm) 8 Emission Designator 9) Digital Modulation Rate (kbps) 10) Digital Modulatio n Type Existing (if mod) New 11) Transmitter Manufacturer 12)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • Basic cable television subscribership grew from 66.1 million subscribers at the end of 1998 to 67.3 million subscribers at the end of 1999, an increase of 1.8 percent. It continued to grow to an estimated 67.7 million subscribers by June 30, 2000, a six month increase of approximately 0.6 percent. Basic cable penetration grew between 1998 and 1999, increasing from 69.1 percent at the end of 1998 to 69.7 percent at the end of 1999. Basic cable penetration remained unchanged at 69.7 percent at the end of the first half of 2000. The percentage of TV households subscribing to cable continued to increase, rising to 67.3 percent of all TV households by the end of 1999, and to 67.4 percent by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.wp
  • the cost recovery mechanism for long-term local number portability (LNP) administration.4 Carriers and certain other providers of telecommunications services must satisfy these various requirements by filing different forms or worksheets, containing similar but not identical information, at different times, at different intervals, and in different locations. 1 47 C.F.R. �� 64.601 et seq. 2 47 C.F.R. �� 54.1 et seq., 69.1 et seq. 3 47 C.F.R. �� 52.1 et seq. 4 47 C.F.R. �� 52.21 et seq. 2 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-233 2. Our existing multiple filing requirements impose real burdens on affected parties -- burdens that we can significantly reduce by combining current contributor reporting worksheets into one unified Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet. Besides benefiting reporting entities, adopting a single
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.wp
  • sooner than June 15, 1997: 47 CFR 61.45, 61.47, 69.104, 69.126, 69.151, and 69.152. The following rules, or amendments thereto, shall be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register: 47 CFR 69.103, 69.107, 69.122, 69.303, and 69.304. The following rules, or amendments thereto, in this Report and Order shall be effective January 1, 1998: 47 CFR 61.3, 61.46, 69.1, 69.2, 69.105, 69.123, 69.124, 69.125, 69.154, 69.155, 69.157, 69.305, 69.306, 69.309, 69.401, 69.411, 69.502, and 69.611. The following rules, which impose new or modified information or collection requirements, shall become effective upon approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), but no sooner than January 1, 1998: 47 CFR 61.42, 61.48, 69.4, 69.106, 69.111, 69.153, 69.156. Unless otherwise stated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98106.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98106.wp
  • actual voice-grade minutes of use, geographically averaged on a study-area-wide basis, that the incumbent Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-106 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-106 47 C.F.R. � 69.111(c)(1) (emphasis added). 222 See e.g., Access Reform Tariffs Designation Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 2276. 223 Id. at 2278. 224 Id. at 2279. 225 47 C.F.R. � 69.111(c). 226 47 C.F.R. � 69.1(c). 227 Access Reform Tariffs Designation Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 2279. 228 52 local exchange carrier experiences based on the prior year's annual use." 222 129. The majority of the price cap LECs' tariff filings revealed that tandem usage in their study areas exceeded 9,000 minutes per trunk for 1996. The recalculated transport rates for the price cap 223 LECs
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99175.pdf
  • Reconsideration and Fourth Report and Order, FCC 93-463, CC Docket No. 90-571, 9 FCC Rcd 1637 (rel. Sept. 29, 1993) (clarifying that TRS Fund contributions may be treated as exogenous costs under price cap regulation). To this end, we believe that AT&T's suggestion concerning price cap reductions would be more appropriately considered in access charge proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1. See also LNP Cost Recovery Order, � 109 (suggesting that incumbent LECs would likely pass on shared costs of number portability to IXCs through exogenous treatment in their access rates). 145 Id. 31 information that we need to collect from contributors.141 63. We are unpersuaded by MCI's contention that the end-user telecommunications revenue method is not competitively neutral simply because
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00133.doc
  • Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. Telebeam Telephone Turtle Lake Telephone Co. United Telephone Co. of Florida United Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania Utelco, Inc. Wisconsin Bell, Inc. The parties to this proceeding are listed in Appendix A to this Order. 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a). Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996) (the Act). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references herein are to the 1998 edition. We refer to prior C.F.R. provisions in instances where the prior rules were different than the current rules. C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (Appeals Court Decision); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97-1202, slip op. (D.C. Cir. 1997).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • 834 (1984). These rules are referred to as the Uniform System of Accounts and are contained in Part 32 of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 32.1-.9000. This is governed by sections 64.901-.904 of our Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 64.901-.904. This step is governed by Part 36 of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1-.741. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.731. The general process of separating these costs between the interstate and intrastate jurisdictions is discussed by the Supreme Court in Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133 (1930). See, e.g., Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 16010-11 (1997) (Access Charge Reform Order), aff'd sub. nom., Southwestern Bell v. FCC,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00306.pdf
  • are percentages of gross book cost. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPENDIX Schedule of Annual Percentages of Depreciation for PAGE 2 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC. - Idaho Effective January 1, 2000 Average Future Remaining Remaining Net Accumulated Life Rate Category Description Life Salvage Depreciation Rate ----------------------------------- -------------- ---------- ------------------ ----------------- (years) (%) (%) (%) A B C D=(100%-B-C)/A 2112 MOTOR VEHICLES 3.2 10 69.1 6.5 2115 GARAGE WORK EQ 6.0 0 46.1 9.0 2116 OTHER WORK EQ 5.6 0 43.5 10.1 2121 BUILDINGS 21.0 0 32.9 3.2 2122 FURNITURE 5.6 0 54.4 8.1 2123.1 OFFICE SUPPORT EQ 2.8 0 34.3 23.5 2123.2 COMPANY COMMUN EQ 5.6 0 53.1 8.4 2124 GEN PURPOSE COMPUTERS 2.9 0 86.1 4.8 2212 DIGITAL ELECTRONIC SW 6.8 0 46.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. These rules tell the incumbent LECs the precise manner in which they may assess interstate access charges on interexchange carriers and end users. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels incumbents may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47 C.F.R. �� 65.1 - 65.830 (relating to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0610_tables.doc
  • Isl * * * * * Ohio 81.3 66.4 37.5 27.5 5.7 Oklahoma 91.3 84.9 34.5 19.8 16.4 Oregon 90.9 79.9 44.7 38.5 26.6 Pennsylvania 86.7 74.6 45.8 34.9 29.8 Puerto Rico 88.2 74.6 21.4 1.4 0.1 Rhode Island 88.6 78.8 54.0 49.3 45.4 South Carolina 82.2 68.2 38.9 29.5 7.8 South Dakota 76.9 55.2 43.1 26.8 24.4 Tennessee 84.5 69.1 36.0 28.3 17.8 Texas 88.6 78.5 33.8 23.6 8.5 Utah 90.6 77.2 35.7 29.6 21.9 Vermont 84.6 74.7 48.5 35.0 13.7 Virgin Islands 85.7 57.7 * * * Virginia 84.1 69.8 42.7 34.9 29.4 Washington 90.2 78.9 43.4 38.2 30.9 West Virginia 88.0 81.1 42.1 27.2 19.0 Wisconsin 89.2 78.6 44.9 30.9 6.5 Wyoming 81.4 54.2 36.1 28.8 1.6 Total
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1210_tables.doc
  • 81.9 41.8 27.3 19.6 Louisiana 87.6 81.1 28.5 20.0 14.0 Maine 86.8 79.7 54.4 36.3 7.3 Maryland 86.6 74.5 47.4 39.8 33.9 Massachusetts 89.0 77.9 50.1 44.0 36.1 Michigan 86.2 74.9 42.0 33.8 10.1 Minnesota 89.6 78.4 44.7 37.9 20.0 Mississippi 91.7 62.8 22.5 11.4 3.2 Missouri 88.9 80.8 34.1 22.7 6.4 Montana 76.5 53.5 31.6 25.7 2.4 Nebraska 84.6 69.1 43.7 29.3 17.2 Table 20 - Continued Percentage of Connections by Downstream Speed by State as of December 31, 2010 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over 200 kbps Upstream and State % over 200 kbps Downstream % at least 768 kbps Downstream % at least 3 mbps Downstream % at least 6 mbps Downstream % at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
  • 75.3 11.9 0.1 7.3 5.4 1Q89 9,326 1,625 21 984 951 12,906 72.3 12.6 0.2 7.6 7.4 2Q89 9,251 1,719 26 1,038 965 12,998 71.2 13.2 0.2 8.0 7.4 3Q89 9,175 1,792 31 1,111 978 13,087 70.1 13.7 0.2 8.5 7.5 4Q89 9,239 1,835 32 1,191 992 13,289 69.5 13.8 0.2 9.0 7.5 1Q90 9,511 2,001 34 1,215 1,007 13,768 69.1 14.5 0.2 8.8 7.3 2Q90 9,553 2,061 37 1,239 1,026 13,916 68.6 14.8 0.3 8.9 7.4 3Q90 9,626 2,197 43 1,279 1,046 14,191 67.8 15.5 0.3 9.0 7.4 4Q90 9,693 2,197 41 1,331 1,067 14,329 67.6 15.3 0.3 9.3 7.4 1Q91 9,594 2,283 134 1,339 1,086 14,436 66.5 15.8 0.9 9.3 7.5 2Q91 9,637 2,354 142 1,358 1,120 14,611 66.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
  • 75.3 11.9 0.1 7.3 5.4 1Q89 9,326 1,625 21 984 951 12,906 72.3 12.6 0.2 7.6 7.4 2Q89 9,251 1,719 26 1,038 965 12,998 71.2 13.2 0.2 8.0 7.4 3Q89 9,175 1,792 31 1,111 978 13,087 70.1 13.7 0.2 8.5 7.5 4Q89 9,239 1,835 32 1,191 992 13,289 69.5 13.8 0.2 9.0 7.5 1Q90 9,511 2,001 34 1,215 1,007 13,768 69.1 14.5 0.2 8.8 7.3 2Q90 9,553 2,061 37 1,239 1,026 13,916 68.6 14.8 0.3 8.9 7.4 3Q90 9,626 2,197 43 1,279 1,046 14,191 67.8 15.5 0.3 9.0 7.4 4Q90 9,693 2,197 41 1,331 1,067 14,329 67.6 15.3 0.3 9.3 7.4 1Q91 9,594 2,283 134 1,339 1,086 14,436 66.5 15.8 0.9 9.3 7.5 2Q91 9,637 2,354 142 1,358 1,120 14,611 66.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris00.pdf
  • 87.9 87.6 88.2 89.0 91.6 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1 All Households 85.9 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris01.pdf
  • 87.9 87.6 88.2 89.0 91.6 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1 All Households 85.9 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris02.pdf
  • 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 93.8 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 93.8 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • 96.9 95.3 97.0 98.9 97.4 93.9 93.4 92.1 93.3 92.6 92.4 92.3 94.7 95.1 93.2 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 12 Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9 76.4 70.4 82.1 86.6 December 76.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • October 100.0 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 100.0 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 100.0 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 100.0 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 100.0 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 100.0 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 100.0 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 100.0 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 100.0 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 100.0 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 100.0 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 100.0 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 100.0 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 100.0 88.8 95.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 88.8 95.4 95.2 104.0 67.0 80.9 92.4 December 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Residence Switched Toll Service Intrastate Residence Switched Toll Service Interstate Residence Switched Toll Service International Residence Switched Toll Service Business Switched Toll Service Business Switched Access Toll Service NAICS Series ID 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 88.8 95.4 95.2 104.0 67.0 80.9 92.4 December 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9 76.4 70.4 82.1 86.6 December 76.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 71 Table 4.2 Consumer Price Indices (1982 - 1984 = 100) All Goods & Services Telephone Services Local ServicesInterstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service BLS Series IdentifierCUUR0000SA0CUUR0000SE270A CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SS27051CUUR0000SS27061 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979 January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9 76.4 70.4 82.1 86.6 December 76.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979 January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9 76.4 70.4 82.1 86.6 December 76.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • DELAWARE 100.0 1.00 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 100.0 1.00 FLORIDA 98.4 1.02 GEORGIA 89.8 1.11 HAWAII 100.0 1.00 IDAHO 90.5 1.10 ILLINOIS 97.7 1.02 INDIANA 95.7 1.04 IOWA 82.6 1.21 KANSAS 84.4 1.18 KENTUCKY 87.1 1.15 LOUISIANA 92.9 1.08 MAINE 83.9 1.19 MARYLAND 99.8 1.00 MASSACHUSETTS 99.9 1.00 MICHIGAN 96.5 1.04 MINNESOTA 74.1 1.35 MISSISSIPPI 93.6 1.07 MISSOURI 94.8 1.05 MONTANA 69.1 1.45 NEBRASKA 86.3 1.16 NEVADA 95.6 1.05 NEW HAMPSHIRE 93.8 1.07 NEW JERSEY 99.8 1.00 NEW MEXICO 90.2 1.11 NEW YORK 96.9 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 86.5 1.16 NORTH DAKOTA 62.1 1.61 OHIO 95.3 1.05 OKLAHOMA 88.4 1.13 OREGON 92.0 1.09 PENNSYLVANIA 95.6 1.05 RHODE ISLAND 100.0 1.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 73.8 1.36 SOUTH DAKOTA 65.5 1.53 TENNESSEE 87.5 1.14 TEXAS 94.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1196.pdf
  • $40,000 - $49,999 98.6 98.8 98.9 99.1 96.6 96.8 96.1 96.1 $50,000 - $59,999 99.1 99.4 99.1 99.4 99.3 100.0 97.0 97.9 $60,000 - $74,999 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.5 97.2 98.2 $75,000 + 99.0 99.3 99.0 99.3 97.9 99.2 98.6 98.6 JULY 95 TOTAL 94.0 95.3 95.2 96.3 86.9 89.2 86.2 88.2 UNDER $5,000 76.6 81.2 80.5 84.0 69.1 75.4 75.2 78.5 $5,000 - $7,499 83.0 86.1 84.5 87.8 80.5 82.8 71.2 73.8 $7,500 - $9,999 87.3 89.4 89.2 91.0 81.9 85.5 74.2 77.2 $10,000 - $12,499 89.0 92.0 90.6 93.3 81.3 86.2 84.9 87.8 $12,500 - $14,999 92.3 94.2 93.3 94.9 88.4 91.8 85.4 87.0 $15,000 - $19,999 93.0 94.8 94.0 95.6 88.5 91.3 84.0 86.8 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
  • $40,000 - $49,999 98.6 98.8 98.9 99.1 96.6 96.8 96.1 96.1 $50,000 - $59,999 99.1 99.4 99.1 99.4 99.3 100.0 97.0 97.9 $60,000 - $74,999 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.5 97.2 98.2 $75,000 + 99.0 99.3 99.0 99.3 97.9 99.2 98.6 98.6 JULY 95 TOTAL 94.0 95.3 95.2 96.3 86.9 89.2 86.2 88.2 UNDER $5,000 76.6 81.2 80.5 84.0 69.1 75.4 75.2 78.5 $5,000 - $7,499 83.0 86.1 84.5 87.8 80.5 82.8 71.2 73.8 $7,500 - $9,999 87.3 89.4 89.2 91.0 81.9 85.5 74.2 77.2 $10,000 - $12,499 89.0 92.0 90.6 93.3 81.3 86.2 84.9 87.8 $12,500 - $14,999 92.3 94.2 93.3 94.9 88.4 91.8 85.4 87.0 $15,000 - $19,999 93.0 94.8 94.0 95.6 88.5 91.3 84.0 86.8 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 2.30 12.2 Evening 1.22 1.13 (7.4) 1.22 2.30 88.5 Night & Weekend 0.82 0.73 (11.0) 0.82 2.30 180.5 125 - 292 Day 2.14 $1.48 (30.8) 2.14 2.30 7.5 Evening 1.28 1.13 (11.7) 1.28 2.30 79.7 Night & Weekend 0.85 0.73 (14.1) 0.85 2.30 170.6 293 - 430 Day 2.27 $1.48 (34.8) 2.27 2.30 1.3 Evening 1.36 1.13 (16.9) 1.36 2.30 69.1 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.73 (18.9) 0.90 2.30 155.6 431 - 925 Day 2.34 $1.48 (36.8) 2.34 2.30 (1.7) Evening 1.40 1.13 (19.3) 1.40 2.30 64.3 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.73 (21.5) 0.93 2.30 147.3 926 - 1910 Day 2.40 $1.48 (38.3) 2.40 2.30 (4.2) Evening 1.44 1.13 (21.5) 1.44 2.30 59.7 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.73 (24.0) 0.96 2.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 6 Table 16.5 Total Telecommunications Revenues by State (Dollar Amounts Shown in Millions) Alabama $2,668 $2,946 $3,205 $3,394 $3,712 $4,008 50.2% Alaska 464 518 561 590 664 717 54.5 Arizona 2,842 3,249 3,667 3,958 4,359 4,972 74.9 Arkansas 1,534 1,719 1,885 2,005 2,303 2,315 51.0 California 22,379 25,100 27,236 28,692 29,384 33,577 50.0 Colorado 3,128 3,526 4,006 4,260 4,826 5,290 69.1 Connecticut 2,765 2,943 3,266 3,173 3,405 3,924 41.9 Delaware 492 567 627 685 788 875 77.8 District of Columbia 886 955 1,049 1,085 1,581 1,648 85.9 Florida 11,582 12,972 14,161 15,042 17,223 18,308 58.1 Georgia 5,335 6,004 6,849 7,469 8,479 8,919 67.2 Guam NA 85 97 103 99 108 Hawaii 775 841 930 969 1,009 1,177 51.9 Idaho 791 908
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 0.0 1994 130,192 118,437 91.0 11,755 9.0 0 0.0 1995 136,231 122,975 90.3 13,255 9.7 0 0.0 1996 142,824 125,595 87.9 17,228 12.1 1 0.0 1997 149,429 128,436 86.0 20,992 14.0 0 0.0 1998 172,916 134,629 77.9 38,286 22.1 0 0.0 19992 186,387 138,691 74.4 47,696 25.6 0 0.0 20003 218,928 157,840 72.1 61,086 27.9 2 0.0 2001 220,442 152,394 69.1 68,047 30.9 2 0.0 2002 219,024 140,005 63.9 79,018 36.1 1 0.0 1 Includes some other channels. 2 Southern New England Telephone Company merged with SBC Communications October 26, 1998. Their data are included in this table starting with 1999. 3 Large increase in 2000 is due to the merger of Bell Atlantic and GTE. Source: ARMIS 43-07 report. 17
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-95.pdf
  • of RevenueAs Percent of Revenue Total Intrastate Total Interstate Total Carrier in Revenue Revenue Revenue Category Local Exchange Service $104.6 45.8% $1.7 0.4% $106.3 17.1% 1.6% Local Private Line Service $32.4 14.2 $1.6 0.4 $34.0 5.5 4.7 Cellular, PCS, Paging & Other Mobile ** 0.0 ** 0.0 ** 0.0 100.0 Alternative Access and Other $67.6 29.6 $151.3 38.3 $218.9 35.1 69.1 Total Local Revenues ** 0.0 ** 0.0 ** 0.0 43.1 Interstate Access $0.0 0.0 $221.6 56.2 $221.6 35.6 100.0 Intrastate Access $14.0 6.1 $0.0 0.0 $14.0 2.2 0.0 Total Access Revenues $14.0 6.1 $221.6 56.2 $235.6 37.8 94.1 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card ** 0.0 ** 0.0 ** 0.0 70.0 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service $9.8 4.3 $18.3 4.6 $28.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
  • 2,243.6 8.8 5,791.7 10.2 8,035.2 9.8 72.1 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service 13,559.8 53.3 38,774.7 68.1 52,334.5 63.5 74.1 Long Distance Private Line Service 1,838.4 7.2 7,299.5 12.8 9,138.0 11.1 79.9 All Other Long Distance 733.9 2.9 3,526.1 6.2 4,260.0 5.2 82.8 Total Toll Revenues 18,375.7 72.3 55,392.0 97.3 73,767.7 89.6 75.1 Total Carrier Revenue $25,419.7 100.0 $56,943.4 100.0 $82,363.0 100.0 69.1 Figures may not add due to rounding and amounts that have been withheld to preserve confidentiality of individual carrier data. Telecommunications Industry Table 11B Revenue: AT&T, MCI, Sprint & WorldCom: Reseller and IXC Affiliates Only - Toll Revenue Only (Dollar amounts shown in millions) TRS Fund Worksheet Data 1996 Intrastate Interstate Intrastate + Interstate Interstate as % of Total Revenue
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
  • $3,157,046 64.9 2.2 22.0 10.6 0.2 $1,060,832 0.1 99.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 393,513,974 32.3 15.2 20.1 28.3 4.1 Italy $196,009,374 65.1 1.5 16.9 13.9 2.6 $6,350,304 50.6 0.2 20.5 27.6 1.1 $11,130,708 3.9 93.7 0.0 2.4 0.0 965,784,266 33.4 2.5 19.8 27.7 16.7 Liechtenstein $471,637 23.9 1.5 6.8 59.2 8.7 $0 $0 7,270,691 8.2 1.6 59.0 21.2 10.0 Luxembourg $5,118,046 69.1 1.2 15.5 12.6 1.7 $225,587 56.1 0.0 20.4 22.6 0.8 $74,766 1.8 0.0 0.8 97.4 0.0 33,435,294 57.2 1.8 26.0 11.9 3.1 Malta $3,098,774 46.5 7.0 17.8 17.5 11.2 $93,977 70.3 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.1 $394 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 22,608,801 29.0 10.5 27.6 17.8 15.1 Netherlands $111,368,352 66.1 0.8 14.5 16.4 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.9 3.7 6.2 8.5 5.5 7.5 Jamaica n.a. n.a. 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.2 4.4 Japan n.a. n.a. 26.9 40.0 48.5 49.2 46.6 64.0 92.3 109.5 159.6 Korea, Republic of n.a. n.a. 3.5 5.8 7.7 7.8 9.1 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 Mexico n.a. n.a. 26.9 16.4 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 Morocco n.a. n.a. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Netherlands n.a. n.a. 3.4 4.0 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 Nigeria n.a. n.a. 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 Pakistan n.a. n.a. 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 Peru n.a. n.a. 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.9 4.1 5.2 7.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 2.6 2.9 3.7 6.2 8.5 5.5 7.5 5.8 5.5 4.2 -51.2 Jamaica 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.2 4.4 10.9 6.1 4.5 122.6 Japan 40.0 48.5 49.2 46.6 64.0 92.3 109.5 160.7 189.4 207.3 81.4 -11.7 Korea, Republic of 5.8 7.7 7.8 9.1 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 31.8 33.4 13.8 -21.6 Mexico 16.4 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 98.7 90.5 53.9 58.7 Morocco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 n.m. Netherlands 4.0 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 9.9 9.0 8.4 -43.7 Nigeria 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 5.8 4.7 4.61009.2 Pakistan 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 371.8 Peru 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 93.8 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • October 100.0 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 100.0 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 100.0 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 100.0 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 100.0 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 100.0 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 100.0 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 100.0 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 100.0 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 100.0 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 100.0 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 100.0 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 100.0 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 100.0 88.8 95.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 93.8 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 88.8 95.4 95.2 104.0 67.0 80.9 92.4 December 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • $40,000 - $49,999 98.6 98.8 98.9 99.1 96.6 96.8 96.1 96.1 $50,000 - $59,999 99.1 99.4 99.1 99.4 99.3 100.0 97.0 97.9 $60,000 - $74,999 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.5 97.2 98.2 $75,000 + 99.0 99.3 99.0 99.3 97.9 99.2 98.6 98.6 JULY 95 TOTAL 94.0 95.3 95.2 96.3 86.9 89.2 86.2 88.2 UNDER $5,000 76.6 81.2 80.5 84.0 69.1 75.4 75.2 78.5 $5,000 - $7,499 83.0 86.1 84.5 87.8 80.5 82.8 71.2 73.8 $7,500 - $9,999 87.3 89.4 89.2 91.0 81.9 85.5 74.2 77.2 $10,000 - $12,499 89.0 92.0 90.6 93.3 81.3 86.2 84.9 87.8 $12,500 - $14,999 92.3 94.2 93.3 94.9 88.4 91.8 85.4 87.0 $15,000 - $19,999 93.0 94.8 94.0 95.6 88.5 91.3 84.0 86.8 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • 0.31 0.73 10.44 16.70 1.47 5.94 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.4 3.3 2.9 7.3 4.9 3.5 3.7 11.0 18.6 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 23.8 27.1 32.5 22.2 20.2 11.9 7.2 7.9 7.1 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 77.7 80.7 97.6 220.5 67.5 47.7 45.6 54.8 56.8 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 770.3 155.8 72.6 69.1 49.6 497.7 762.0 80.3 337.1 % Trunk Grps. Exceeding 3 Month Blocking 1.01% 2.86% 0.89% 6.78% 1.19% 0.65% 2.05% 4.19% 2.10% Objectives During Calendar Year 9 - 16 Table 9.2(b): Company Comparision -- Switch Downtime & Trunk Blocking -- 1996 Company AmeritechBell AtlanticBellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Sprint Total Access Lines in Thousands 19,553 20,767 21,822 16,541 20,466
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 87.9 87.6 88.2 89.0 91.6 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1 All Households 85.9 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 87.9 87.6 88.2 89.0 91.6 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1 All Households 85.9 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 214.2 1,107.5 475.3 219.1 412.3 1,106.7 0.808 IL Indiana 750.5 1.84 748.6 194.5 554.1 275.0 99.1 179.8 553.9 0.206 IN Iowa 245.5 6.23 239.3 48.7 190.6 81.5 34.5 72.7 188.7 1.838 IA Kansas 298.7 298.7 52.9 245.8 102.0 41.8 102.0 245.8 KS Kentucky 464.9 6.85 458.0 106.1 352.0 183.6 66.9 96.8 347.3 4.693KY Louisiana 432.2 11.63 420.6 69.7 350.9 193.3 69.1 83.9 346.3 4.589LA Maine 166.7 2.74 164.0 28.4 135.6 56.2 31.9 47.5 135.6 ME Maryland 679.8 12.50 667.3 102.8 564.5 273.8 87.2 202.4 563.5 0.983MD Massachusetts 922.8 17.36 905.4 90.6 814.8 382.6 154.2 278.1 814.8 MA Michigan 1,191.7 3.16 1,188.6 302.0 886.6 443.3 142.7 300.2 886.3 0.301MI Minnesota 530.9 13.21 517.7 100.3 417.4 167.0 69.3 177.4 413.7 3.707MN Mississippi 231.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 7,184.7 75.4CA Colorado 5,099.4 660.4 4,439.0 3,241.6 1,197.4 685.2 180.9 321.2 1,187.3 10.2CO Connecticut 3,442.9 15.8 3,427.1 2,533.5 893.6 370.7 267.1 250.2 887.9 5.7CT Delaware 724.1 71.0 653.1 449.6 203.5 105.3 27.3 70.5 203.1 0.4DE District of Columbia 1,250.7 161.9 1,088.8 632.2 456.6 101.7 102.5 249.0 453.3 3.4DC Florida 16,940.6 1,658.3 15,282.3 11,312.1 3,970.2 2,491.3 539.5 906.7 3,937.5 32.7FL Georgia 8,069.1 1,247.2 6,821.8 4,846.4 1,975.4 1,110.7 273.7 560.2 1,944.6 30.8GA Hawaii 1,383.8 102.2 1,281.6 988.9 292.7 165.4 46.8 76.1 288.3 4.4HI Idaho 1,118.5 123.6 994.9 676.6 318.3 167.8 65.9 83.4 317.1 1.2ID Illinois 9,668.9 1,083.1 8,585.9 6,475.4 2,110.5 1,062.1 807.8 226.0 2,095.8 14.7IL Indiana 5,123.4 319.1 4,804.3 3,681.5 1,122.8 668.8 261.7 182.0 1,112.5 10.3IN Iowa 1,611.4 138.0 1,473.4 987.5 486.0 218.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • Companies Exchange Companies Industry Companies Study Loops Percent Loops Percent Loops Percent Loops Percent of State Areas of Total of Total of Total Industry Alabama 28 2,302,066 90.7% 0 0.0% 235,651 9.3% 2,537,717 90.7% AL Alaska 25 0 0.0 0 0.0 456,011 100.0 456,011 0.0 AK Arizona 16 2,940,610 93.7 0 0.0 198,159 6.3 3,138,769 93.7 AZ Arkansas 29 1,069,214 69.1 0 0.0 478,337 30.9 1,547,551 69.1 AR California 2223,420,709 98.5 0 0.0 357,280 1.5 23,777,989 98.5 CA Colorado 28 2,872,354 95.6 0 0.0 132,523 4.4 3,004,877 95.6 CO Connecticut 2 2,527,459 99.0 0 0.0 25,155 1.0 2,552,614 99.0 CT Delaware 1 598,874 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 598,874 100.0 DE District of Columbia 1 924,593 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 143.4 64.5 14.7 63.6 142.8 0.6 HI Idaho 198.4 4.8 193.6 25.8 167.8 71.5 25.0 66.0 162.5 5.3 ID Illinois 1,268.1 1.3 1,266.8 237.2 1,029.5 392.4 120.0 489.4 1,001.8 27.7 IL Indiana 691.5 3.5 688.1 144.2 543.9 258.6 53.8 220.5 532.9 10.9 IN Iowa 324.7 4.9 319.8 75.5 244.3 75.7 45.4 113.9 235.0 9.3 IA Kansas 257.1 257.1 24.7 232.4 69.1 31.5 125.2 225.8 6.7 KS Kentucky 275.7 4.8 270.8 25.9 244.9 103.4 37.9 95.4 236.7 8.2 KY Louisiana 455.8 9.6 446.2 51.5 394.7 173.6 49.4 156.2 379.2 15.5 LA Maine 148.1 2.5 145.5 13.9 131.6 54.1 17.6 59.9 131.6 ME Maryland 755.2 11.5 743.7 85.9 657.8 262.4 75.0 320.4 657.8 MD Massachusetts 879.7 13.2 866.5 54.3 812.2 325.2 78.7 408.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 22.2 27.5 8.7 58.4 MT NEBRASKA 201.3 (0.31) 201.6 70.4 131.2 49.3 58.3 23.6 131.2 NE NEVADA 139.7 (0.48) 140.1 9.3 130.8 50.6 62.9 17.4 130.8 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 169.2 2.31 166.9 5.5 161.4 57.0 91.9 12.6 161.4 NH NEW JERSEY 1,008.7 1.56 1,007.1 145.3 861.9 403.9 321.6 135.2 860.7 1.174 NJ NEW MEXICO 186.5 3.04 183.4 33.9 149.5 63.6 69.1 16.9 149.5 NM NEW YORK 2,443.8 11.13 2,432.7 332.3 2,100.4 826.6 1,012.9 260.9 2,100.4 NY NORTH CAROLINA 856.1 0.89 855.2 298.0 557.2 295.1 182.0 79.1 556.1 1.076 NC NORTH DAKOTA 64.5 (1.45) 66.0 19.6 46.4 18.7 19.8 7.8 46.4 ND OHIO 1,127.2 (1.39) 1,128.6 350.5 778.1 378.9 287.3 111.1 777.4 0.705 OH OKLAHOMA 276.2 (3.44) 279.7 47.2 232.5 114.1 83.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 66.9 SD TENNESSEE 25 2,465,023 80.2 228,404 7.4 378,385 12.3 3,071,812 87.7 TN TEXAS 57 8,376,840 78.4 1,681,396 15.7 620,202 5.8 10,678,438 94.2 TX UTAH 13 941,891 95.7 0 0.0 42,703 4.3 984,594 95.7 UT VERMONT 10 307,533 84.1 0 0.0 57,939 15.9 365,472 84.1 VT VIRGINIA 21 2,839,412 75.4 825,402 21.9 100,559 2.7 3,765,373 97.3 VA WASHINGTON 22 2,258,674 69.1 718,268 22.0 293,257 9.0 3,270,199 91.0 WA WEST VIRGINIA 10 703,559 83.1 0 0.0 142,781 16.9 846,340 83.1 WV WISCONSIN 89 2,047,863 67.0 442,215 14.5 567,691 18.6 3,057,769 81.4 WI WYOMING 10 226,095 82.4 0 0.0 48,214 17.6 274,309 82.4 WY UNITED STATES 1,431120,909,662 76.8 25,533,402 16.2 10,985,271 7.0 157,428,335 93.0 US N. MARIANA ISL. 1 0 0.0 0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 99.8 MD MASSACHUSETTS 3 4,460,078 99.9 0 0.0 3,871 0.1 4,463,949 99.9 MA MICHIGAN 39 5,312,786 84.9 728,244 11.6 216,969 3.5 6,257,999 96.5 MI MINNESOTA 88 2,133,116 74.1 0 0.0 744,760 25.9 2,877,876 74.1 MN MISSISSIPPI 19 1,236,080 93.6 0 0.0 85,166 6.4 1,321,246 93.6 MS MISSOURI 44 2,499,418 75.2 652,214 19.6 172,384 5.2 3,324,016 94.8 MO MONTANA 18 350,983 69.1 0 0.0 157,077 30.9 508,060 69.1 MT NEBRASKA 41 522,260 52.5 337,118 33.9 136,056 13.7 995,434 86.3 NE NEVADA 14 330,523 27.4 823,420 68.2 52,939 4.4 1,206,882 95.6 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 12 767,486 93.8 0 0.0 50,636 6.2 818,122 93.8 NH NEW JERSEY 3 5,992,697 96.6 198,847 3.2 9,406 0.2 6,200,950 99.8 NJ NEW MEXICO 15 767,814 85.2 45,535 5.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • NH NEW JERSEY 10,588.0 571.7 10,016.3 6,980.4 3,035.8 1,464.8 573.9 978.5 3,017.2 18.663 NJ NEW MEXICO 2,035.2 79.6 1,955.5 1,399.4 556.2 345.3 113.4 94.0 552.6 3.555 NM NEW YORK 23,548.8 1,111.2 22,437.6 15,860.0 6,577.6 2,568.6 2,151.8 1,806.6 6,526.9 50.665 NY NORTH CAROLINA 8,982.2 427.4 8,554.8 6,397.2 2,157.7 1,390.2 381.2 354.6 2,126.0 31.630 NC NORTH DAKOTA 491.6 9.6 482.0 318.7 163.3 69.1 41.8 51.9 162.7 0.623 ND OHIO 11,706.7 706.9 10,999.9 8,311.5 2,688.3 1,459.6 710.0 477.9 2,647.5 40.831 OH OKLAHOMA 3,352.6 118.0 3,234.6 2,363.5 871.2 514.5 143.1 208.5 866.2 5.015 OK OREGON 3,674.3 148.0 3,526.3 2,537.2 989.0 576.3 207.3 200.3 983.9 5.100 OR PENNSYLVANIA 13,296.8 615.7 12,201.6 8,881.8 3,319.8 1,841.7 477.4 982.1 3,301.1 18.677 PA RHODE ISLAND 1,028.5 55.0 973.4 684.8 288.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • Connecticut 4,688.6 114.5 4,574.1 3,298.6 1,275.5 554.2 440.4 279.9 1,274.5 1.0CT Delaware 946.1 42.5 903.6 626.7 276.9 149.9 39.9 85.8 275.6 1.2DE District of Columbia 1,876.5 162.4 1,714.1 1,094.1 620.1 148.7 148.8 314.7 612.3 7.8DC Florida 21,188.1 872.6 20,315.5 15,156.0 5,159.5 3,427.3 729.9 921.0 5,078.1 81.4 FL Georgia 10,524.1 578.2 9,945.9 7,349.3 2,596.6 1,624.3 394.8 512.9 2,532.0 64.6GA Hawaii 1,858.1 69.1 1,789.1 1,371.8 417.3 237.3 69.6 104.4 411.3 6.0 HI Idaho 1,428.5 42.1 1,386.4 945.1 441.3 235.3 101.7 102.0 439.1 2.2 ID Illinois 12,601.8 551.4 12,050.4 9,167.2 2,883.2 1,504.1 876.0 420.5 2,800.6 42.0 IL Indiana 6,348.3 359.6 5,988.8 4,500.0 1,488.8 878.5 289.4 299.8 1,467.6 21.2 IN Iowa 2,696.0 99.5 2,596.5 1,830.0 766.5 364.1 164.7 232.6 761.5 5.0 IA Kansas 2,572.9 97.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000983.doc
  • proceedings associated with these petitions the following file numbers: 1) Petition for Reinstatement of Southern California Pay Phone Company, File No. E-99-29; Petition for Reinstatement of Total, File No. E-99-30. See C.F. Communications Corp., et al., v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., et al., 12 FCC Rcd 2134 (1997) (Denial Order). See 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. C.F. Communications Corporation v. FCC, No. 97-1202, slip. op. (D.C. Cir. 1997). The Commission subsequently took voluntary remand of several other cases raising the same issues that were the subject of appeals of a separate order and consolidated the cases from both proceedings for purposes of the remand proceeding. See C.F. Communications Corporation v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/fcc00206.doc
  • v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 556, 594, 602, �� 88, 108 (1998); Infonxx, Inc. v. New York Tel. Co., FCC 97-359, File No. E-96-26, 1997 WL 621592, � 16 (1997); Beehive Tel., Inc. v. Bell Operating Companies, 10 FCC Rcd 10562, 10566, �� 23-24 (1995), affirmed after voluntary remand, 12 FCC Rcd 17930 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.1, et seq. In the Access Charge Reform Docket, we acknowledged that CLEC access rates may ``be higher due to the CLECs' high start-up costs for building new networks, their small geographical service areas, and the limited number of subscribers over which CLECs can distribute costs.'' Access Charge Reform, Fifth Report and Order and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1999/fcc99146.pdf
  • Order on Reconsideration and Fourth Report and Order, FCC 93-463, Docket No. 90-571, 9 FCC Rcd 1637 (rel. Sept. 29, 1993) (clarifying that TRS Fund contributions may be treated as exogenous costs under price cap regulation). To this end, we believe that AT&T suggestion concerning price cap reductions would be more appropriately considered in access charge proceedings. See CFR section 69.1. See also LNP Cost Recovery Order, paragraph 109 (suggesting that incumbent LECs would like pass on shared costs of number portability to IXCs 13 favors interexchange carriers ("IXCs") by virtue of the fact that they are able to deduct payments made to the underlying carriers. The end user methodology was opposed by MCI WorldCom, Inc. (MCI WorldCom), which claimed that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.wp
  • a reference from one document to another. On the World Wide Web, a user can select a link on one page and "jump" to a second page referenced by that link. Telemessaging/Electronic Publishing Order, at para. 46 n.114, citing Wired Style: Principles of English Usage in the Digital Age (Hale ed., 1996) at 49-50. Id. 260 See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. (Part 69). The Part 69 rules are designed to be consistent with the Commission's jurisdictional separations rules that govern the allocation of incumbent LECs' expenses and investment between the interstate and state jurisdictions. See Part 36 of the Commission's Rules; 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 et seq. 261 MTS and WATS Market Structure, Docket No. 78-72, Memorandum Opinion and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.txt
  • they are not considered to be ``telecommunications carriers.'' Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 12 FCC Rcd 8776, �� 788-90 (1997). Pursuant to section 251(a) of the 1996 Act, all telecommunications carriers must ``interconnect directly or indirectly with the facilities and equipment of other telecommunications carriers.'' Section 251(c)(2) imposes additional interconnection obligations on incumbent LECs. See generally 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. MTS and WATS Market Structure, 97 FCC 2d 682, 711-22 (1983). Downes, Thomas and Shane Greenstein, ``Do Commercial ISPs Provide Universal Access,'' (Dec. 1998), available at http://skew2.kellogg.nwu.edu/~greenste/research/papers/tprcbook.pdf. POP stands for Point of Presence and refers to the number of local nodes for dial-up access that the ISP has deployed. Although business telephone lines may feature metered usage rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209958-1.pdf
  • YES Volume Control Resets when placed YES YES NO back on-hook? Employs conventional circuitry? ? ? El Figure 1: Comparison of Tested Units Note 1. Sample "C" is 6 dB quieter than nominal at the minimum volume control. PARAMETER SAMPLE "A- SAMPLE `B" SAMPLE `C" Noise at Minimum 41.4 46.7 31.0 < 40 dB SPL (A) Noise at Maximum 64.1 69.1 56.6 (No Spec.) dB SPL (A) Transmit Loudness (TOLR) -45.6 -46.6 -44.1 -48 +8, -5 dB ROLR Loudness at Minimum 42.3 43.5 52.0 +46 f 5 dB ROLR Loudness at Maximum 22.9 25.2 28.5 dB SPL Level at Minimum 95.5 96.9 87.7 dB SPL (1 kHz) SPL Level at Maximum 116.2 115.7 111.5 dB SPL (1 kHz) Volume Control Range
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210007-2.pdf
  • Spec.) dB SPL (A) Transmit Loudness (TOLR) -48 +8, -5 dB ROLR Loudness at Minimum +46+5dB ROLR Loudness at Maximum dB SPL Level at Minimum dB SPL (1 kHz) SPL Level at Maximum dB SPL (1 kHz) Volume Control Range Calculated using ROLR Proposed > 20 dB Volume Control Range Calculated using SPL Proposed > 20 dB 41.4 46.7 64.1 69.1 -45.6 -46.6 42.3 43.5 22.9 25.2 95.5 96.9 116.2 115.7 19.4 18.3 20.7 18.8 Figure2: Summary of Measurements 31 .o 56.6 -44.1 52.0 28.5 87.7 111.5 23.5 23.9 - 2.5 - Note: Since ROLR and TOLR are calculated using losses the more neaative the ROLR or TOLR the louder the telephone. - 26 - SAMPLE "A" Volume Control Range -1;/1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22497, 22555 (1998); Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 01-78 (rel. Mar. 7, 2001). See Appendix A for a list of the parties. 47 U.S.C. � 201(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references are to the 2000 edition. We refer to prior C.F.R. editions in instances where the prior rules were different than the current rules. C.F. Communications Corp., et al. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Remand, 15 FCC Rcd 8759 (2000) (``Liability Order''); recon. denied, 15
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01185.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01185.html
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. Finally, Part 61 requires ILECs to publish their rates in tariffs, and the rules restrict how and when incumbents may change their rates. See 47 C.F.R. �� 61.1 - 61.193. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels ILECs may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1890A1.html
  • al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098, 1109 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3671, 5. See also Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2225, 2226 (EB 2002), at 3 (``Second Waiver Order''). 5 Second Waiver Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 2226, 3. 6
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-259A1.html
  • the Secretary of the Commission shall cause to have this Order published in the Federal Register. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint. 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 2 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 3 See C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97- 1202, slip. op (D.C. Cir. 1997); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc. et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 7334, 7335-36 (1993); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
  • complaints for administrative convenience. See Letter from Radhika V. Karmarkar, Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to all counsel, File Nos. EB-02-MD- 018 - 030 (rel. May 1, 2002) (``May 1, 2002 Letter Ruling'') at 5. 2 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c). Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996) (the ``Act''). 3 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. (1987 - 1997). Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references to Part 69 of the Commission's rules refer to the rules in effect prior to April 15, 1997. 4 ``Citizens'' refers collectively to Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company, Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company of California,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2000A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1450A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2865A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. f/k/a South Central Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-023 (filed January 14, 2004). Because the Commission order assessing liability in this case was on appeal to the D.C. Circuit at the time this motion was filed, we deferred ruling
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2866A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a TDS Telcom, Communications Corporation of Indiana d/b/a TDS Telcom, and Home Telephone Company of Pittsboro, Inc., Supplement to Formal complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-025 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3167A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3476A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3477A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2. Communications Vending corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-029 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Payphone Systems v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-4022A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1972A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3 Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed April 11, 2005). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1974A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-022 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Notice of Settlement
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1975A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB- 02-MD-028 (filed April 26, 2002). 3 NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-028 (filed May 17, 2005). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1976A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD- 021 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3 Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3072A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety and the proceedings ARE TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation f/k/a US West Communications, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-019 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); IMR Capital Corporation v. Verizon New England, Inc. f/k/a New England Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-020 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Verizon North, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-674A1.html
  • (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back for statute of limitations purposes to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8; Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2115 (EB 2002) (``Second Waiver Order''); Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • and any such charge, practice, classification or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful." Complaint at 4, P: 4; Joint Statement, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed June 6, 2007) ("Joint Statement") at 1, P: 2. Joint Statement at 1-2, P: 4. Joint Statement at 2, P: 5. Joint Statement at 1-2, P: 4. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.1-69.2. Complaint at 6, P: 8; Answer of Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Company, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed May 29, 2007) ("Answer") at 12, P: 8. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.601-69.612. Complaint at 6-7, P: 9; Answer at 12, P: 9; see 47 C.F.R. S: 69.3(d). Complaint at 6-7, P: 9; Answer at 12, P: 9; see 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.604,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-5A1.html
  • the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19975, 19990, P: 32 (2003); see also Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc. v. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., 423 F.3d 1056, 1067-70 (9th Cir. 2005) (and Commission orders cited therein), aff'd, Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., 550 U.S. 45 (2007). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. S: 203; 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.1 - 69.731; see n.32, supra. See generally 2001 CLEC Access Charge Reform Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 9957 (stating that "our tariff rules were historically intended to protect purchasers of service from monopoly providers, not to protect sellers from monopsony purchasing power"); In the Matter of Communique Telecommunications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 13635, 13649, P: 26
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00206.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00206.txt
  • v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 556, 594, 602, �� 88, 108 (1998); Infonxx, Inc. v. New York Tel. Co., FCC 97-359, File No. E-96-26, 1997 WL 621592, � 16 (1997); Beehive Tel., Inc. v. Bell Operating Companies, 10 FCC Rcd 10562, 10566, �� 23-24 (1995), affirmed after voluntary remand, 12 FCC Rcd 17930 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.1, et seq. In the Access Charge Reform Docket, we acknowledged that CLEC access rates may ``be higher due to the CLECs' high start-up costs for building new networks, their small geographical service areas, and the limited number of subscribers over which CLECs can distribute costs.'' Access Charge Reform, Fifth Report and Order and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2679A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2679A1.pdf
  • at 5. Petition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c); see also Southeast Arkansas Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 61 FCC 2d 72 (1976) (reconsideration denied where evidence could have been discovered with due diligence). Petition at 6. Id. at 10. Mount Pisgah Application, Exhibit response to Section II, Question 2(a). Petition at 10. North Carolina General Statutes, � 1-69.1. Id., � 55-1-40(9)a.3. Id., � 39-24. Petition at 10. Cherokee Home Demonstration Club v. Oxendine, 100 N.C. App. 622, 397 S.E.2d 643 (1990). See National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 June 19, 2007 DA 07-2679 In Reply Refer to: 1800B3-BSH Released: June 19, 2007 ��`��gd, I
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-bc/can-dtv.pdf
  • 308 47 36LINDEN NJ 404243 740049 4570 460148.9 460 50 51MONTCLAIR NJ 405153 741203 5000 243179.2 243 58 18NEW BRUNSWICK NJ 403717 743015 1320 223 50 223 13 61NEWARK NJ 404243 740049 60.3 500198.7 500 68 53NEWARK NJ 404454 735910 2630 439 55.9 439 63 8NEWTON NJ 410036 743539 2190 223 3.2 223 41 40PATERSON NJ 404454 735910 2340 421 69.1 421 9 38SECAUCUS NJ 404243 740049 61.7 500136.4 500 66 29WEST MILFORD NJ 410714 741203 24 217 50 217 10 26ALBANY NY 423815 735954 316 305 1000 305 13 15ALBANY NY 424708 733744 178 357505.7 357 23 4ALBANY NY 423701 740046 3020 366 1 366 55 50AMSTERDAM NY 425905 741049 5000 223136.8 223 62 0ARCADE NY 422852 783403 1290 164
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1,018 1,141 1,357 1,306 1,307 1,209 18.8 Italy n.a. n.a. 1,545 1,772 1,700 2,234 2,635 2,740 4,965 15,613 20,067 798.3 Jamaica n.a. n.a. 587 620 639 771 668 802 1,041 969 1,204 56.2 Japan n.a. n.a. 4,888 5,629 6,582 7,041 8,681 11,133 10,764 15,125 12,387 75.9 Korea, Republic of n.a. n.a. 1,143 1,492 2,246 2,299 2,678 2,858 2,807 3,037 3,887 69.1 Mexico n.a. n.a. 23,270 27,812 37,030 40,350 52,280 64,529 71,216 83,465 84,320 109.0 Morocco n.a. n.a. 91 89 113 115 112 114 114 113 142 23.5 Netherlands n.a. n.a. 1,224 1,073 1,179 2,087 1,831 3,401 3,497 3,012 5,247 151.4 Nigeria n.a. n.a. 232 208 232 294 364 365 303 333 454 54.4 Pakistan n.a. n.a. 268 329 269 300 305
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files07/CREPOR07.PDF
  • 0.0 11.0 89.0 $61,331 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 171,636,345 0.1 30.3 2.7 14.3 52.7 Iraq $24,796,439 0.0 17.5 0.9 6.4 75.2 $530,878 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $10,028 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 79,920,941 0.0 26.5 3.7 20.2 49.6 Israel $46,713,582 0.0 17.6 0.8 16.6 65.0 $3,689,923 0.0 36.4 0.0 11.7 51.9 $816,709 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 875,683,610 0.0 13.5 1.2 16.2 69.1 Jordan $7,291,668 0.0 38.6 1.2 15.7 44.5 $316,528 0.0 12.5 0.0 25.6 61.8 $1,183,377 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 85,532,194 0.0 22.0 2.6 29.8 45.6 Kuwait $13,698,850 0.1 22.8 2.0 17.2 57.9 $315,445 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 89.2 $19,653 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 124,067,925 0.2 22.1 3.2 27.2 47.3 Lebanon $34,010,536 0.0 13.5 20.3 42.7 23.4 $328,507 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
  • 93.9 Mar-00 30 37 18 14 34.262.390.6 Mar-01 30 35 16 14 40.266.890.9 Milwaukee - Racine Mar-96 28 34 22 16 27.5 n/a 68.5 Nov-97 29 35 17 16 30.4n/a 81.1 Nov-98 31 35 16 16 29.7 n/a 80.2 Mar-00 31 35 16 17 23.446.276.1 Mar-01 31 35 15 17 27.651.286.5 San Antonio TX Mar-96 34 33 16 13 23.7n/a 69.1 Nov-97 34 33 16 14 28.8n/a 81.5 Nov-98 34 34 17 12 32.6 n/a 85.1 Mar-00 32 38 20 12 30.750.682.4 Mar-01 32 39 18 11 32.652.083.3 Middlesex-Somerset-Union NJ Mar-96n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nov-97n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nov-98n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mar-00n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mar-01 33 5
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/order_da_91_143.pdf
  • NIl. I I 3030 lOp SYS 36/69 I I I I I NIl. I I 3031 I.op SYS 36/69 I I I I I NIl. I I 3040 ITransmiss ion 36/69 I I I I I NIl. 1 I 3041 I'Transmission 36/691 I I II NIl. I I 3050 IIOT 36/69 I I I I I I I 3051 1,IOT 36/69.1 I I I I I I 3060 IC&WF 36/69 I I I I I NIl. I I 3061 I'C&~F 36/69 I I I I I NIl. I I 3070 IPHFTU 36/69 I I I I I I I 3071 I'PHFTU 36/69 I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I 3080 ITot Acc Depr
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/depreciation/documents/fcc00306.pdf
  • are percentages of gross book cost. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPENDIX Schedule of Annual Percentages of Depreciation for PAGE 2 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC. - Idaho Effective January 1, 2000 Average Future Remaining Remaining Net Accumulated Life Rate Category Description Life Salvage Depreciation Rate ----------------------------------- -------------- ---------- ------------------ ----------------- (years) (%) (%) (%) A B C D=(100%-B-C)/A 2112 MOTOR VEHICLES 3.2 10 69.1 6.5 2115 GARAGE WORK EQ 6.0 0 46.1 9.0 2116 OTHER WORK EQ 5.6 0 43.5 10.1 2121 BUILDINGS 21.0 0 32.9 3.2 2122 FURNITURE 5.6 0 54.4 8.1 2123.1 OFFICE SUPPORT EQ 2.8 0 34.3 23.5 2123.2 COMPANY COMMUN EQ 5.6 0 53.1 8.4 2124 GEN PURPOSE COMPUTERS 2.9 0 86.1 4.8 2212 DIGITAL ELECTRONIC SW 6.8 0 46.4
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf
  • and any such charge, practice, classification or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful.'' Complaint at 4, � 4; Joint Statement, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed June 6, 2007) (``Joint Statement'') at 1, � 2. Joint Statement at 1-2, � 4. Joint Statement at 2, � 5. Joint Statement at 1-2, � 4. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.2. Complaint at 6, � 8; Answer of Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Company, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed May 29, 2007) (``Answer'') at 12, � 8. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601-69.612. Complaint at 6-7, � 9; Answer at 12, � 9; see 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(d). Complaint at 6-7, � 9; Answer at 12, � 9; see 47 C.F.R. �� 69.604,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-983A1.txt
  • proceedings associated with these petitions the following file numbers: 1) Petition for Reinstatement of Southern California Pay Phone Company, File No. E-99-29; Petition for Reinstatement of Total, File No. E-99-30. See C.F. Communications Corp., et al., v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., et al., 12 FCC Rcd 2134 (1997) (Denial Order). See 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. C.F. Communications Corporation v. FCC, No. 97-1202, slip. op. (D.C. Cir. 1997). The Commission subsequently took voluntary remand of several other cases raising the same issues that were the subject of appeals of a separate order and consolidated the cases from both proceedings for purposes of the remand proceeding. See C.F. Communications Corporation v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.txt
  • Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22497, 22555 (1998); Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 01-78 (rel. Mar. 7, 2001). See Appendix A for a list of the parties. 47 U.S.C. � 201(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references are to the 2000 edition. We refer to prior C.F.R. editions in instances where the prior rules were different than the current rules. C.F. Communications Corp., et al. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Remand, 15 FCC Rcd 8759 (2000) (``Liability Order''); recon. denied, 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.txt
  • v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098, 1109 (D.C. Cir. 2001). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3671, � 5. See also Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2225, 2226 (EB 2002), at � 3 (``Second Waiver Order''). Second Waiver Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 2226, � 3.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.txt
  • the Secretary of the Commission shall cause to have this Order published in the Federal Register. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint. 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97-1202, slip. op (D.C. Cir. 1997); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc. et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 7334, 7335-36 (1993); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.txt
  • at 2001-03, paras. 21-23. The bush policy has since been repealed. See Policy for Licensing Domestic Satellite Earth Stations in the Bush Communities of Alaska, IB Docket No. 02-30, RM No. 7246, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16874 (2003). CAP Approval Reconsideration Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 2005, para. 27. Id. at 2003-05, paras. 25-27. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. See e.g., Klick-Murphy Declaration at 11-12, para. 22. Klick-Murphy Declaration at 3-4, paras. 9-10 and 14, para. 27. The rates in Alascom's 2003 tariff filing are based on data collected from July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002. See Waiver Denial, 18 FCC Rcd at 16460, para. 26. Klick-Murphy Declaration at 16-18, paras. 30-31. Alascom Tariff FCC No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2865A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. f/k/a South Central Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-023 (filed January 14, 2004). Because the Commission order assessing liability in this case was on appeal to the D.C. Circuit at the time this motion was filed, we deferred ruling
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2866A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2866A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a TDS Telcom, Communications Corporation of Indiana d/b/a TDS Telcom, and Home Telephone Company of Pittsboro, Inc., Supplement to Formal complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-025 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3476A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3477A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. . Communications Vending corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-029 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Payphone Systems v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A3.txt
  • 45 922. 439.0 986461 31060.6 1136463 35482.8 IA IOWA CITY KWKB 35096 20 1510.0 123. 25 50.0 123.0 416517 11148.8 435418 11546.9 IA MASON CITY KIMT 66402 03 100.00 472. 42 1000 472.0 541340 32490.5 764343 42342.3 IA MASON CITY KYIN 29086 24 1740.0 436. 18 50.0 436.0 275143 19678.0 278471 19786.5 IA OTTUMWA KYOU-TV 53820 15 2090.0 363. 14 69.1 363.0 352684 19741.6 360213 19990.1 IA RED OAK KHIN 29085 36 2040.0 475. 35 63.1 475.0 814888 19923.6 822186 20191.6 IA SIOUX CITY KCAU-TV 11265 09 309.00 616. 30 767. 616.0 493722 38126.6 563706 44072.3 IA SIOUX CITY KMEG 39665 14 1000.0 351. 39 50.0 351.0 269228 18992.7 269369 19041.0 IA SIOUX CITY KPTH 77451 44 5000.0 610. 49 226.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed April 11, 2005). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1972 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1972 0 � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1973A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. CenturyTel, Inc. and Century Telephone of Central Indiana, Inc. f/k/a Central Indiana Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-024 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. CenturyTel, Inc. and Century Telephone of Central Indiana, Inc. f/k/a Central Indiana Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1974A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-022 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Notice of Settlement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-028 (filed April 26, 2002). NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-028 (filed May 17, 2005). Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1975 Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1976A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-021 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3072A1.txt
  • 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety and the proceedings ARE TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et. seq. Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation f/k/a US West Communications, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-019 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); IMR Capital Corporation v. Verizon New England, Inc. f/k/a New England Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-020 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Verizon North, Inc. f/k/a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.txt
  • 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back for statute of limitations purposes to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a). 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, � 8; Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2115 (EB 2002) (``Second Waiver Order''); Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2679A1.txt
  • at 5. Petition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c); see also Southeast Arkansas Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 61 FCC 2d 72 (1976) (reconsideration denied where evidence could have been discovered with due diligence). Petition at 6. Id. at 10. Mount Pisgah Application, Exhibit response to Section II, Question 2(a). Petition at 10. North Carolina General Statutes, � 1-69.1. Id., � 55-1-40(9)a.3. Id., � 39-24. Petition at 10. Cherokee Home Demonstration Club v. Oxendine, 100 N.C. App. 622, 397 S.E.2d 643 (1990). See National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 June 19, 2007 DA 07-2679 In Reply Refer to: 1800B3-BSH Released: June 19, 2007 ��`��gd, I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.txt
  • N N - - A A 45 NTSC Y Y NTSC -23.0 O O 46 ATSC Y Y ATSC -20.7 O O 47 ATSC N N NTSC -78.7 A A 48 ATSC Y N ATSC < -69.2 O O 49 NTSC N N NTSC -93.1 A A 50 NTSC Y Y NTSC -66.1 O A 51 ATSC Y N NTSC -69.1 O O TABLE 5-10. I2R WSD Prototype Results at Test Site 2. CH Signal Type (Database) Within Service Contour? (Y/N) Viewable? (Y/N) Signal Type (Measured) Measured Power Level (dBm) Occupied (O) & Available (A) Channels Reported by WSD L1/ S1 L1/ S2 L2/ S1 L2/ S2 21 - N N - < -71.0 - - - - 22 NTSC Y
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A6.txt
  • Y 39 D 620.3 -65.3 N 40 D 626.3 -20.4 Y 41 D 632.3 -44.7 Y 42 D 638.3 -43.9 Y 43 N 645.25 -72.7 6 44 45 N 657.25 -23 2 46 D 662.3 -20.7 Y 47 N 669.2 -78.7 N 48 D 674.3 <-69.2 N 49 N 681.2 -93.1 N 50 N 687.25 -66.1 5 51 N 693.2 -69.1 N Table C-6. Measurement Results - Ellicott City Site Channel Signal Type (N or D) Frequency (MHz) Measured Power (dBm) Viewable (Picture/TASO) Reported PSIP 21 N 513.25 -95.7 N 22 N 519.28 -29.8 1 23 N 525.2 -72 N 24 N 531.26 -39.2 1 25 N 537.24 -72.8 N 26 N 543.24 -37.2 1 27 D 548.3 -50.9 Y 26.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.txt
  • bureaus to dismiss petitions for) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 182.899 Tm 100 Tz (reconsideration of Commission action that are procedurally defective\). Letter from Deborah Sandidge, Lincoln) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 171.399 Tm 99 Tz (Parish School Board, to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, filed June 28, 2006, 1) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 159.849 Tm (\(Lincoln Parish Petition for Reconsideration\); Letter from Mozes Greenfield, Telecommunications Project Director,) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 148.349 Tm (United Talmudical Academy, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket Nos. 96-) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 136.849 Tm (45 and 97-21, filed Dec. 22, 2003, 1 \(UTA Petition for Reconsideration\); Letter from Orin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.txt
  • Tr /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (Federal Communications Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 481.9 731.1 Tm 98 Tz (DA 11-1119) Tj 1 0 0 1 279.1 707.799 Tm (Before the) Tj 1 0 0 1 213.8 695.1 Tm 99 Tz (Federal Communications Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 245 682.35 Tm 101 Tz (Washington, D.C. 20554) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 657.149 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (In the Matter of) Tj 1 0 0 1 304.55 655 Tm 76 Tz (\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 304.55 642.5 Tm 59 Tz /OPBaseFont1 14 Tf (\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 631.95 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service) Tj 1 0 0 1 304.55 629.799
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.txt
  • 10 Tf (and Order upgrading and modernizing the B-rate program to encourage the expansion of fast, affordable) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 692.7 Tm (Internet access in schools and libraries across the country.4 As part of the) Tj 1 0 0 1 396.7 692.2 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Schools and Libraries Sixth) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 679.95 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Report and Order, the Commission launched a pilot program - EDU2O 11 - to investigate the merits and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 667.25 Tm (challenges of wireless off-premises connectivity services for mobile learning devices, and to help the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 654.75 Tm 108 Tz (Commission determine whether
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.txt
  • 0 1 69.35 430.849 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (By the Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau:) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.55 407.049 Tm 83 Tz (1.) Tj 1 0 0 1 132.45 407.099 Tm 109 Tz (In this order, we dismiss as untimely petitions for reconsideration by Rockwood School) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 394.599 Tm 110 Tz (District, Eureka, Missouri \(Rockwood\) and Yakutat School District, Yakutat, Alaska \(Yakutat\) of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 382.149 Tm 108 Tz (decisions by the Wireline Competition Bureau \(Bureau\).1) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 358.349 Tm 96 Tz (2.) Tj 1 0 0 1 132.45 358.349 Tm 109 Tz (The petitioners seek reconsideration of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.txt
  • the proposed compliance plan filed by) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 449.349 Tm 100 Tz (Cricket Communications, Inc. \(Cricket\).' By filing this compliance plan, Cricket seeks to satisfy the) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 436.849 Tm 99 Tz (conditions imposed by the Commission in granting Cricket's petition to forbear from the requirement that) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 424.149 Tm (its service area conform to the underlying service area of the rural telephone company for participation in) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 411.149 Tm 97 Tz (the Lifeline program.2) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 392.949 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (Interested parties may file comments on or before November 4, 2011, and reply comments on) Tj 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.txt
  • 0 0 1 214.3 744.049 Tm 99 Tz 3 Tr /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (Federal Communications Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 481.65 743.799 Tm (DA 11-1682) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 708.049 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (invoice online but its service provider was 30 days late in certifying the invoice.5 USAC then issued the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 695.549 Tm (Form 472 \(BEAR\) Notification Letter that stated none of the funding for the submitted invoice was) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 682.85 Tm (disbursed.6 The letter did not say that the invoice was denied, only that "Invoice Received Date) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 670.149 Tm ([04/29/2009] Later Than."7 The letter also did not include any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.txt
  • 245.75 375.399 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (25,) Tj 1 0 0 1 262.05 375.149 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (2004, the Wireline Competition Bureau designated Nextel as) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 362.449 Tm 100 Tz (an ETC in several states, including, as relevant here, Alabama, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 349.949 Tm (Virginia.4 Sprint and Nextel merged to become Sprint Nextel in 2005.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 331.449 Tm 89 Tz (4.) Tj 1 0 0 1 141.8 331.25 Tm 99 Tz (Pursuant to section 214\(e\) of the Act, Sprint Nextel filed, on behalf of its affiliates,) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 318.549 Tm 100 Tz (notices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 258.699 291.849 Tm (More than a one or two sentence description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 279.399 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.45 278.949 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 266.699 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 254.199 Tm 93 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 228.5 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 215.799 Tm (Division,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.txt
  • number appears in the caption of this proceeding,) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.8 265.949 Tm 99 Tz (filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 240.5 Tm (Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 228.049 Tm 100 Tz (class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail.) Tj 1 0 0 1 267.1 227.549 Tm (All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 215.35 Tm 99 Tz (Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.1 189.649 Tm 100 Tz (All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.txt
  • materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 545.1 Tm 101 Tz (\(Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format\), send an e-mail to fcc504\(fcc.gov or call the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 532.349 Tm 99 Tz (Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at \(202\) 418-0530 \(voice\), \(202\) 418-0432 \(tty\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 506.899 Tm /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent to each of the following:) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 482.199 Tm 92 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (\(1\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.1 481.5 Tm 100 Tz (The Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, S.W., Room) Tj 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.txt
  • a non-facilities) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 318.049 Tm 110 Tz (based ETC for Lifeline-only support provided it fulfills the commitments in its Revised Compliance Plan) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 305.349 Tm 109 Tz (in each state where it is designated to provide Lifeline service, and otherwise is in compliance with the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 293.099 Tm (Act and Commission rules.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.1 274.35 Tm 99 Tz (2.) Tj 1 0 0 1 141.8 273.649 Tm 109 Tz (i-wireless is a non-facilities-based commercial mobile radio services provider) Tj 1 0 0 1 487.9 273.399 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (\(i.e.,) Tj 1 0 0 1 510.2 273.199 Tm 107 Tz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 303.649 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (or before December 13, 2011. All pleadings are to reference) Tj 1 0 0 1 346.8 303.399 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (WC Docket) Tj 1 0 0 1 404.4 303.149 Tm 102 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (No. 09-197. Comments may) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 290.949 Tm 100 Tz (be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System \(ECFS\) or by filing paper copies.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 230.899 Tm 91 Tz ('Petition by NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., d/b/a Viaero Wireless for Commission Agreement in Redefining Certain) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 219.399 Tm 90 Tz (Service Areas of Incumbent Rural Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.txt
  • designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on August 29, 2011.1 Cintex seeks) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 424.849 Tm (designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier for the limited purpose of offering Lifeline and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 412.099 Tm (Link-Up services in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, New Hampshire,) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 399.399 Tm 99 Tz (New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia.2) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.8 380.699 Tm (Interested parties may file) Tj 1 0 0 1 224.15 380.699 Tm /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (comments on or before November 29, 2011,) Tj 1 0 0 1 431.25 380.449 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (and) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.txt
  • 99 Tz (Service Administrative Company \(filed June 15,) Tj 1 0 0 1 266.85 437.049 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (2005\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 415.449 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (We also grant a waiver to Lower Merion because it missed the deadline for filing its appeal with the Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 404.199 Tm 102 Tz (by three days. Section) Tj 1 0 0 1 163.4 404.199 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.720) Tj 1 0 0 1 193.65 403.949 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Commission's rules provides parties with 60 days to appeal a decision by) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 392.399 Tm 101 Tz (USAC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.txt
  • Tm (every telecommunications carrier that provides interstate telecommunications services shall contribute, on) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 205.25 Tm (an equitable and nondiscriminatory basis, to the specific, predictable, and sufficient mechanisms) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 192.549 Tm 100 Tz (established by the Commission to preserve and advance universal service.4 Section 254\(d\) further) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 179.799 Tm 99 Tz (provides that any other provider of interstate telecommunications may be required to contribute "to the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 146.649 Tm 30 Tz /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (1) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.1 141.649 Tm 90 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (MeetingOne.com Corp. Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision, WC Docket No. 06-122)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.txt
  • in granting PlatinumTel's petition to forbear from) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 413.099 Tm 99 Tz (the requirement that carriers designated as eligible telecommunications carriers \(ETC5\) for purposes of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 400.599 Tm (federal universal service support provide services, at least in part, over their own facilities in order to) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 388.149 Tm 98 Tz (participate in the Lifeline program.2) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 369.399 Tm 100 Tz (Interested parties may file) Tj 1 0 0 1 224.15 368.699 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (comments on or before December 15, 2011, and reply comments on) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 356.699 Tm 102 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (or before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.txt
  • Tf (All) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 192.049 Tm 100 Tz (hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 179.549 Tm 101 Tz (before entering the building. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Commercial overnight mail) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 166.599 Tm 100 Tz (\(other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail\) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 120.25 Tm 91 Tz ('CAL Communications, Inc. Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 \(filed November 8, 2011\) \(Compliance) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 109 Tm 89 Tz (Plan\).) Tj 1 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.txt
  • waivers related to) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 197.549 Tm 92 Tz (such decisions, issued by USAC. Section) Tj 1 0 0 1 240.2 197.299 Tm 89 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (54.719\(c\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 281.75 197.049 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 185.799 Tm 90 Tz (by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.7 19\(c\). The E -) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 174.25 Tm (rate program is also known as the schools and libraries universal service mechanism.) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 157.449 Tm 57 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 463.2 175 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (20554.) Tj 1 0 0 1 496.3 174.75 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (All hand) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 162.299 Tm 100 Tz (deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 149.549 Tm 101 Tz (before entering the building. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Commercial overnight mail) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.1 123.849 Tm 91 Tz (Application for Review of Wirelme Competition Bureau Order by MeetingOne.com Corp., WC Docket No. 06-) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 112.349 Tm 88 Tz (1222 \(filed Dec.) Tj 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.txt
  • 1 90.45 465.649 Tm 100 Tz (Charles Tyler, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th) Tj 1 0 0 1 88.05 453.149 Tm (Street, S.W., Room 5-B521, Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: Charles.Tyler@fcc.gov.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 427.75 Tm (Filings and comments are also available for public inspection and copying during regular) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 415 Tm (business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room) Tj 1 0 0 1 503.25 415 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (CY-) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 402.299 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating) Tj 1 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.txt
  • 1 91.65 135.399 Tm 90 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (Request for Review at 1-2.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 114.049 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont5 10 Tf (See Electronic Filing ofDocuinents in Rulemaking Proceedings,) Tj 1 0 0 1 337.9 114 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 102.049 Tm 100 Tz (FCC Rcd 11322 \(1998\).) Tj ET endstream endobj 28 0 obj 5128 endobj 23 0 obj << /Dest [ 22 0 R /XYZ 0 792 null ] /Next 31 0 R /Parent 4 0 R /Prev 5 0 R /Title (page 2) >> endobj 32 0 obj << /BitsPerComponent 1 /ColorSpace /DeviceGray /DecodeParms << /Columns 2550
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 0 0 cm 612 0 0 792 0 0 cm /background_2 Do Q BT 0 0 0 rg 0 0 0 RG 1 0 0 1 214.05 743.549 Tm 99 Tz 3 Tr /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (Federal Communications Commission) Tj 1 0 0 1 488.6 743.35 Tm 97 Tz (DA 11-864) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 707.799 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (providers for USF purposes are therefore not required to file the FCC Form 499-A, unless required to do) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 695.35 Tm (so by the Commission's rules governing contributions to other federal regulatory programs.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.05 669.85 Tm 87 Tz (3.) Tj 1 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.txt
  • 69.6 389.049 Tm (provider, or consortium that purchases directly from the service provider\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 373.199 Tm 51 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (5) Tj 1 0 0 1 78.7 367.5 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 356.199 Tm (Local Exchange Carriers, Transport Rate Structure and Pricing, End User C'ommon Line Charge,) Tj 1 0 0 1 467.75 355.949 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (CC Docket Nos.) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 344.649 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (96-45,) Tj 1 0 0 1 98.85 344.649 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (96-262, 94-1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.txt
  • 0 1 147.349 682.149 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C.) Tj 1 0 0 1 306.699 682.399 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (20554.) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.1 656.95 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 644.2 Tm 99 Tz (\(Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format\), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 631.7 Tm (Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at \(202\) 418-0530 \(voice\), \(202\) 418-0432 \(tty\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 606.049 Tm /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.txt
  • Statistics \(BLS\), seeks access to certain) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 449.549 Tm (carrier revenue information for 2009 that the Commission collected from wireless carriers on FCC Form) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 436.849 Tm 100 Tz (499-A \(Form 499-A\).' In particular, BLS requests all data for 2009 that wireless carriers reported in) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 424.349 Tm (blocks 3 \(Carrier's Carrier Revenue Information\) and 4 \(End-User and Non-Telecommunications) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 411.649 Tm 99 Tz (Revenue Information, and Total Revenue and Uncollectible Revenue Information\) of that fonn.2) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 386.699 Tm 100 Tz (The Conunission collects revenue data on Form 499-A for purposes of determining the amounts) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.txt
  • Universal Service Administrative) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 183.85 Tm (Company Pursuant to Section 1.3, 32.18,) Tj 1 0 0 1 237.35 183.649 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (54.719) Tj 1 0 0 1 267.6 183.399 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (and 54.722 of the Commission's rules and Petition for Waiver of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 172.099 Tm (Section 32.27\(c\) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 \(filed Dec. 22, 2011\); 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 477.35 169.75 Tm 65 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 489.6 171.399 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont6 11 Tf (54.719\(c\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 160.599 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (\(Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 351.399 Tm (rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 340.099 Tm 101 Tz (Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.7 19\(c\). Section 54.407\(c\) of the Commission's rules maintains that E-rate funds shall) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 328.599 Tm 100 Tz (be available on a first-come-first-served basis, but requires USAC to implement an initial funding window that treats) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 316.849 Tm (all applicants filing within that window as if their applications were simultaneously received. 47 C.F.R. �) Tj 1 0 0 1 498.95 316.599 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.507\(c\).) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.txt
  • 0 1 191 377.099 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (applies here, and we remand the underlying applications to USAC to allow the) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 364.599 Tm (applicants another opportunity to file their FCC Forms 486.) Tj 1 0 0 1 339.35 364.599 Tm (We also waive any Commission or USAC) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 351.899 Tm (procedural deadline, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary because the FCC Forms 486) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 339.149 Tm (of these applicants were initially rejected. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 326.449 Tm (expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application listed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.txt
  • (By the Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau:) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.8 412.599 Tm 78 Tz (1.) Tj 1 0 0 1 124.05 412.349 Tm 100 Tz (Consistent with the Wireline Competition Bureau's \(Bureau\) decision in the) Tj 1 0 0 1 463.4 411.899 Tm /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (Barrow County) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 399.649 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (School District Order,' we grant the appeal filed by Los Lunas School District \(Los Lunas\) of a decision) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 386.949 Tm (by the Universal Service Administrative Company \(USAC\) that denied funding from the E-rate program) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 374.449 Tm (for funding year 2008 because Los Lunas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 85.4 151.699 Tm 87 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 114.95 150.049 Tm 65 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 122.4 151.699 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (54.302.) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 128.449 Tm 87 Tz /OPBaseFont5 10 Tf (31d.) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 106.849 Tm 101 Tz (4See Electronic Filing ofDocuments in Rulemaking Proceedings,) Tj 1 0 0 1 337.65 106.599 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 95.049 Tm 100 Tz (FCC Rcd 11322 \(1998\).) Tj ET endstream endobj 26 0 obj 5884 endobj 21 0 obj << /Dest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.txt
  • to receive certain) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 427 Tm 111 Tz (forms of high-cost universal service support.' The Division has found that there is good cause to grant) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 414.299 Tm 110 Tz (the requested waivers because the missed deadlines were the result of minor ministerial, clerical, or) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 401.549 Tm 111 Tz (procedural errors. The Division also notes that all of the petitions were unopposed.2 These petitions and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 389.099 Tm 109 Tz (related information are listed below:) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.1 326.399 Tm 101 Tz (Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R.) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 253.65 543.649 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (UNIVERSAL) Tj 1 0 0 1 321.6 543.649 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (SERVICE RULES) Tj 1 0 0 1 253.65 518.2 Tm (WC Docket No. 10-90) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 493 Tm 102 Tz (Comment Date: February 23, 2012) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 480.049 Tm 100 Tz (Reply Comment Date: March 9, 2012) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 455.099 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request filed by the Vermont Public) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 442.349 Tm (Service Board \(VPSB\) for clarification of several aspects of the) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 69.35 491.8 Tm 101 Tz (Comment Date: February 6, 2012) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 479.099 Tm (Reply Comment Date: February 21, 2012) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 454.149 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a request for review filed by UTEX) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 440.949 Tm 103 Tz (Communications Corp. \(UTEX\).' UTEX seeks review and reversal of a decision by the Universal) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 427.699 Tm 104 Tz (Service Administrative Company, which among other things, assessed late fees and penalties) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 414.5 Tm (associated with UTEX's 2009 FCC Form 499-A and rejected revisions to a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • 97-158 1997: 47 CFR �� 61.45, 61.47, 69.104, 69.126, 69.151, and 69.152. The following rules, or amendments thereto, shall be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register: 47 CFR �� 69.103, 69.107, 69.122, 69.303, and 69.304. The following rules, or amendments thereto, in this Report and Order shall be effective January 1, 1998: 47 CFR �� 61.3, 61.46, 69.1, 69.2, 69.105, 69.123, 69.124, 69.125, 69.154, 69.155, 69.157, 69.305, 69.306, 69.309, 69.401, 69.411, 69.502, and 69.611. The removal of the following sections is effective January 1, 1998: 47 CFR �� 69.201, 69.203, 69.204, 69.205, and 69.209. The following rules, which impose new or modified information or collection requirements, shall become effective upon approval by the Office of Management and Budget
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204983A1.txt
  • of clearing the band before they are required to do so likely will not be the "hard" costs of changing equipment or advertising their new channel but the "soft" costs of lost profits. 20880 Federal Communications Commission_________FCC 00-224 voluntary relocation agreements could facilitate clearing in the 700 MHz band by providing a replacement ("relocation") channel for incumbent broadcasters on Channels 59-69.1 8 88. In considering three-way transactions, we note that different considerations arise depending on whether the relocation channel is analog or digital. Where the relocation channel is analog, the lower band broadcaster who provides that channel would make an early transition to DTV operations, thus freeing up its analog channel to be used to relocate either an analog or digital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207249A1.txt
  • 61.6 4098.1275 6323.6675 437 G7DDT 62.4 4096.8675 6324.8825 1720 G7DDT 66.1 4078.935 6325.715 1720 G7DDT 69.3 4111.02 6331.9925 1720 G7DDT 68.6 3708.365 6333.95 1720 G7DDT 66.6 3737.75 6336.965 874 G7DDT 67.3 3764.22 6344.1 109 G7DDT 58.7 4090.9 6345.95 1720 G7DDT 60.1 4148.05 6359.5 437 G7DDT 57.9 4090.5 6363.8 218 G7DDT 54.4 4091.15 6366.1 1720 G7DDT 62.8 3898.4075 6062.5 27600 G7DDT 69.1 6123.4075 1720 G7DDT 62.6 6252.265 1060 G7DDT 64.5 6368.2 1720 G7DDT 65.3 109 G7DDT 4090.5 ======================================================================== ======= GOVERNMENT OF CANADA REQUESTS COORDINATION WITH USA SERVICE: FIXED SATELLITE CLASS OF STATION: FIXED EARTH STATION Licence #: 4856432 Location: DES LAURENTIDES (DLT-07A), QU Coordinates: 455640 N, 743200 W Ground Height (AMSL) / Antenna Height (AGL): 211 m / 9 m Antenna Diameter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231157A1.txt
  • Effective: 04/01/2001 TX Frequency (MHz) Bandwidth (kHz) Emissions EIRP (dBW) RX Frequency (MHz) 5855.06 1710 G7DDT 61.8 NA 5857.06 1710 G7DDT 57.7 NA 5858.86 1710 G7DDT 66.9 NA Licence: 4939434 (continued) TX Frequency (MHz) Bandwidth (kHz) Emissions EIRP (dBW) RX Frequency (MHz) 5860.46 1710 G7DDT 66.7 NA 5862.06 1710 G7DDT 66.4 NA 5865.66 1710 G7DDT 58.8 NA 5899.03 13900 G7DDT 69.1 NA 6082.20 1560 G7DDT 54.9 NA 6098.91 1430 G7DDT 62.8 NA 6112.81 51 G7DDT 59.2 NA 6204.25 15000 G7DDT 70.4 NA 6227.67 9620 G7DDT 61.8 NA 6224.12 23800 G7DDT 68.7 NA 6362.09 328 G7DDT 51.9 NA 6363.20 614 G7DDT 57.7 NA 6364.61 1750 G7DDT 58.3 NA 6366.64 1720 G7DDT 58.3 NA 6367.85 437 G7DDT 54.7 NA 6394.76 15000 G7DDT 79.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236019A1.txt
  • dBW/Hz Satellite Operating Arc: 30 to 33 W Satellite transmission VIA: INTELSAT 801 Date Effective: 04/01/2001 TX Frequency (MHz) Bandwidth (kHz) Emissions EIRP (dBW) RX Frequency (MHz) 5855.06 1710 G7DDT 61.8 NA 5857.06 1710 G7DDT 57.7 NA 5858.86 1710 G7DDT 66.9 NA 5860.46 1710 G7DDT 66.7 NA 5862.06 1710 G7DDT 66.4 NA 5865.66 1710 G7DDT 58.8 NA 5899.03 13900 G7DDT 69.1 NA 6082.20 1560 G7DDT 54.9 NA 6098.91 1430 G7DDT 62.8 NA 6112.81 51 G7DDT 59.2 NA 6204.25 15000 G7DDT 70.4 NA 6227.67 9620 G7DDT 61.8 NA 6224.12 23800 G7DDT 68.7 NA 6362.09 328 G7DDT 51.9 NA 6363.20 614 G7DDT 57.7 NA 6364.61 1750 G7DDT 58.3 NA 6366.64 1720 G7DDT 58.3 NA 6367.85 437 G7DDT 54.7 NA 6394.76 15000 G7DDT 79.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.txt
  • I 45.111 44.41 43.4 Longitude I -117.31 -1081 -81.2 42.3 30.11 31.9 27.8 30.9 32.94 39.94 -73.1 -82.2 -87.5 -97.7 -110 -113.6 -117 ITest points for 90 cm antenna I I I I I t I I Test points for 75 cm antenna Latitude 47.94 50.1 46.9 Longitude -118 -101 -83 ~~ 45.6 44.44 25.7 26.3 26.3 31.76 33.66 -71.9 -69.1 -80.5 -97.8 -99 -114.4 -115.7 Latitude Longitude ILongitude I -71.31 -67.41 -70.51 -78.31 -80.81 -99.71 -1161 -1171 -123.61 -120.81 47.11 46.4 46.4 45.1 43.94 26.9 29.6 26.8 30.44 33.11 -118.3 -93.3 -83.7 -75 -70.6 -81.3 -89.9 -98 -105.3 -115 22 I I I Test points for 1.2 m antenna Latitude 461 44.41 41.8 26.8 25.2 26.7 32.3 32.9 47.9 49.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.txt
  • I 45.111 44.41 43.4 Longitude I -117.31 -1081 -81.2 42.3 30.11 31.9 27.8 30.9 32.94 39.94 -73.1 -82.2 -87.5 -97.7 -110 -113.6 -117 ITest points for 90 cm antenna I I I I I t I I Test points for 75 cm antenna Latitude 47.94 50.1 46.9 Longitude -118 -101 -83 ~~ 45.6 44.44 25.7 26.3 26.3 31.76 33.66 -71.9 -69.1 -80.5 -97.8 -99 -114.4 -115.7 Latitude Longitude ILongitude I -71.31 -67.41 -70.51 -78.31 -80.81 -99.71 -1161 -1171 -123.61 -120.81 47.11 46.4 46.4 45.1 43.94 26.9 29.6 26.8 30.44 33.11 -118.3 -93.3 -83.7 -75 -70.6 -81.3 -89.9 -98 -105.3 -115 22 I I I Test points for 1.2 m antenna Latitude 461 44.41 41.8 26.8 25.2 26.7 32.3 32.9 47.9 49.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 2.6 2.9 3.7 6.2 8.5 5.5 7.5 5.8 5.5 4.2 -51.2 Jamaica 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.2 4.4 10.9 6.1 4.5 122.6 Japan 40.0 48.5 49.2 46.6 64.0 92.3 109.5 160.7 189.4 207.3 81.4 -11.7 Korea, Republic of 5.8 7.7 7.8 9.1 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 31.8 33.4 13.8 -21.6 Mexico 16.4 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 98.7 90.5 53.9 58.7 Morocco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 n.m. Netherlands 4.0 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 9.9 9.0 8.4 -43.7 Nigeria 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 5.8 4.7 4.61009.2 Pakistan 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 371.8 Peru 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
  • $3,157,046 64.9 2.2 22.0 10.6 0.2 $1,060,832 0.1 99.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 393,513,974 32.3 15.2 20.1 28.3 4.1 Italy $196,009,374 65.1 1.5 16.9 13.9 2.6 $6,350,304 50.6 0.2 20.5 27.6 1.1 $11,130,708 3.9 93.7 0.0 2.4 0.0 965,784,266 33.4 2.5 19.8 27.7 16.7 Liechtenstein $471,637 23.9 1.5 6.8 59.2 8.7 $0 $0 7,270,691 8.2 1.6 59.0 21.2 10.0 Luxembourg $5,118,046 69.1 1.2 15.5 12.6 1.7 $225,587 56.1 0.0 20.4 22.6 0.8 $74,766 1.8 0.0 0.8 97.4 0.0 33,435,294 57.2 1.8 26.0 11.9 3.1 Malta $3,098,774 46.5 7.0 17.8 17.5 11.2 $93,977 70.3 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.1 $394 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 22,608,801 29.0 10.5 27.6 17.8 15.1 Netherlands $111,368,352 66.1 0.8 14.5 16.4 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1,018 1,141 1,357 1,306 1,307 1,209 18.8 Italy n.a. n.a. 1,545 1,772 1,700 2,234 2,635 2,740 4,965 15,613 20,067 798.3 Jamaica n.a. n.a. 587 620 639 771 668 802 1,041 969 1,204 56.2 Japan n.a. n.a. 4,888 5,629 6,582 7,041 8,681 11,133 10,764 15,125 12,387 75.9 Korea, Republic of n.a. n.a. 1,143 1,492 2,246 2,299 2,678 2,858 2,807 3,037 3,887 69.1 Mexico n.a. n.a. 23,270 27,812 37,030 40,350 52,280 64,529 71,216 83,465 84,320 109.0 Morocco n.a. n.a. 91 89 113 115 112 114 114 113 142 23.5 Netherlands n.a. n.a. 1,224 1,073 1,179 2,087 1,831 3,401 3,497 3,012 5,247 151.4 Nigeria n.a. n.a. 232 208 232 294 364 365 303 333 454 54.4 Pakistan n.a. n.a. 268 329 269 300 305
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 97.0 98.9 97.4 93.9 93.4 92.1 93.3 92.6 92.4 92.3 94.7 95.1 93.2 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 6.11 6 - 55 Table 6.11 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 97.0 98.9 97.4 93.9 93.4 92.1 93.3 92.6 92.4 92.3 94.7 95.1 93.2 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 6.11 6 - 55 Table 6.11 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 88.8 95.4 95.2 104.0 67.0 80.9 92.4 December 89.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
  • 21.8 20.0 39.8 14.9 3.5 $2,247,346 23.8 12.1 43.6 1.0 19.5 $142,127 0.0 85.5 14.5 0.0 0.0 128,415,442 13.3 27.8 50.5 3.0 5.4 Paraguay $8,382,654 56.8 10.2 7.7 12.9 12.3 $425,289 53.6 0.0 25.7 7.9 12.8 $3,172 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 75.9 58,762,072 50.9 10.9 12.6 11.4 14.3 Peru $66,252,540 9.8 34.9 31.6 12.9 10.7 $2,729,536 4.2 3.0 9.1 14.6 69.1 $570,734 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 56.7 1,219,159,159 3.1 52.8 20.0 3.8 20.2 Suriname $8,123,564 72.8 1.6 21.4 2.9 1.3 $237,342 28.0 0.0 40.9 0.0 31.1 $579 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 98.1 46,497,394 63.4 1.0 32.9 0.8 1.9 Uruguay $11,910,976 41.3 24.4 12.6 16.8 4.9 $741,286 38.1 0.0 13.6 10.4 37.9 $25,733 0.0 41.2 0.2 50.3 8.3 108,880,900 31.8 33.6 12.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.txt
  • 91.1 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1 81.3 41.6 63.3 74.3 July 73.3 83.1 94.7 80.9 42.1 61.5 72.1 August 74.1 84.1 96.9 81.5 42.3 62.0 72.4 September 73.8 83.0 96.9 78.8 41.4 62.8 72.8 October 69.7 77.1 96.8 63.6 39.4 60.7 71.1 November 71.4 80.9 96.4 74.9 38.3 60.2 69.8 December 70.7 80.9 95.7 75.4 38.5 58.6 69.1 2003January 70.0 79.9 95.6 73.0 38.2 58.3 68.5 February 70.4 79.7 87.4 81.2 37.2 59.2 68.9 March 70.2 79.8 87.4 81.6 37.0 58.7 67.9 April 69.4 78.2 86.9 78.2 35.6 58.9 68.7 May 69.8 79.5 87.1 82.2 34.4 58.3 67.1 June 69.7 78.9 87.1 80.7 33.8 58.7 68.3 July 69.8 79.4 86.9 81.3 36.3 58.4 67.0 August 69.9 79.5 86.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 91.1 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • 91.1 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February* 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.9 82.5 63.5 March* 85.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.txt
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.6 82.5 63.5 March 85.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.txt
  • 83.9 422.2 764.1 41.9 MD Massachusetts 2,495.3 134.5 2,360.9 1,461.9 899.0 308.4 81.5 474.8 864.7 34.3 MA Michigan 3,256.9 360.9 2,895.9 2,050.8 845.1 326.5 99.9 384.7 811.1 34.0 MI Minnesota 1,131.5 46.8 1,084.7 662.4 422.2 101.3 43.6 237.4 382.3 39.9 MN Mississippi 1,063.4 48.5 1,014.9 745.2 269.7 103.4 39.0 107.0 249.4 20.3 MS Missouri 2,277.6 357.6 1,920.0 1,275.2 644.8 213.1 69.1 324.3 606.5 38.3 MO Montana 256.4 24.9 231.5 148.7 82.8 27.7 11.1 34.8 73.6 9.3 MT Nebraska 545.1 41.2 503.9 325.4 178.5 49.2 23.4 95.2 167.8 10.7 NE Nevada 777.8 89.8 688.0 434.5 253.5 93.9 43.4 106.1 243.4 10.1 NV New Hampshire 452.6 19.0 433.6 265.0 168.6 60.4 19.5 82.5 162.4 6.3 NH New Jersey 3,600.4 209.1 3,391.3 1,993.1 1,398.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1 81.3 41.6 63.3 74.3 July 73.3 83.1 94.7 80.9 42.1 61.5 72.1 August 74.1 84.1 96.9 81.5 42.3 62.0 72.4 September 73.8 83.0 96.9 78.8 41.4 62.8 72.8 October 69.7 77.1 96.8 63.6 39.4 60.7 71.1 November 71.4 80.9 96.4 74.9 38.3 60.2 69.8 December 70.7 80.9 95.7 75.4 38.5 58.6 69.1 2003January 70.0 79.9 95.6 73.0 38.2 58.3 68.5 February 70.4 79.7 87.4 81.2 37.2 59.2 68.9 March 70.2 79.8 87.4 81.6 37.0 58.7 67.9 April 69.4 78.2 86.9 78.2 35.6 58.9 68.7 May 69.8 79.5 87.1 82.2 34.4 58.3 67.1 June 69.7 78.9 87.1 80.7 33.8 58.7 68.3 July 69.8 79.4 86.9 81.3 36.3 58.4 67.0 August 69.9 79.5 86.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 $40,000 or more 97.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.6 82.5 63.5 March 85.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287961A1.txt
  • ending December 31, 2007, advanced services lines increased 34% from 59.8 million to 80.2 million (or 20.4 million lines). Of the 80.2 million advanced services lines reported as of December 31, 2007, 56.4% were at least 2.5 mbps in the faster direction and 43.5% were slower than 2.5 mbps in the faster direction. Of the 80.2 million advanced services lines, 69.1 million served primarily residential end users. Cable modem service represented 50.7% of these lines while 32.6% were ADSL connections, 0.1% were SDSL or traditional wireline connections, 2.4% were fiber connections to the end user premises, and 14.1% used other types of technology including satellite, terrestrial fixed or mobile wireless (on a licensed or unlicensed basis), and electric power line. Geographic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.txt
  • 0.0 11.0 89.0 $61,331 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 171,636,345 0.1 30.3 2.7 14.3 52.7 Iraq $24,796,439 0.0 17.5 0.9 6.4 75.2 $530,878 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $10,028 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 79,920,941 0.0 26.5 3.7 20.2 49.6 Israel $46,713,582 0.0 17.6 0.8 16.6 65.0 $3,689,923 0.0 36.4 0.0 11.7 51.9 $816,709 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 875,683,610 0.0 13.5 1.2 16.2 69.1 Jordan $7,291,668 0.0 38.6 1.2 15.7 44.5 $316,528 0.0 12.5 0.0 25.6 61.8 $1,183,377 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 85,532,194 0.0 22.0 2.6 29.8 45.6 Kuwait $13,698,850 0.1 22.8 2.0 17.2 57.9 $315,445 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 89.2 $19,653 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 124,067,925 0.2 22.1 3.2 27.2 47.3 Lebanon $34,010,536 0.0 13.5 20.3 42.7 23.4 $328,507 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
  • 72.5 70.1 84.6 63.1 129.2 Troubles Found per Thousand Lines 172.5 120.6 256.8 265.4 95.0 88.1 154.8 150.1 208.5 Repeat Troubles as a Pct. of Trouble Rpts. 11.5% 10.6% 21.1% 15.1% 20.2% 11.5% 19.3% 17.4% 21.9% Residential Complaints per Million Res. Access Lines 900.1 308.2 674.8 325.4 52.3 58.3 48.4 273.9 335.1 Business Complaints per Million Bus. Access Lines 215.2 69.1 120.8 103.5 12.2 24.8 0.0 31.2 100.1 * Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications Table 2(b): Switch Downtime & Trunk Blocking Non-Mandatory Price-Cap Company Comparison -- 2008 CenturyCincinnatiCitizens Citizens EmbarqHawaiian Iowa WindstreamWindstream Tel. Frontier TelecomTelecom Alltel Valor Total Access Lines in Thousands 498 705 1,034 594 5,688 493 193 636 433 Total Trunk Groups 299 44 244
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
  • 72.5 70.1 84.6 63.1 129.2 Troubles Found per Thousand Lines 172.5 120.6 256.8 265.4 95.0 88.1 154.8 150.1 208.5 Repeat Troubles as a Pct. of Trouble Reports 11.5% 10.6% 21.1% 15.1% 20.2% 11.5% 19.3% 17.4% 21.9% Res. Complaints per Mill. Res. Access Lines 900.1 308.2 674.8 325.4 52.3 58.3 48.4 273.9 335.1 Bus. Complaints per Mill. Bus. Access Lines 215.2 69.1 120.8 103.5 12.2 24.8 0.0 31.2 100.1 NA: Not available Table 9.1 (b) Installation, Maintenance, & Customer Complaints Other Price-Cap Companies - 2008 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 7 AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T Qwest Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech BellSouth PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE Total Access Lines in Thousands 11,627 15,519 12,254 10,034
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.6 82.5 63.5 March 85.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 96.1 97.2 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 97.1 97.2 95.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 98.7 98.0 97.8 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 92.4 93.9 93.4 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 81.0 86.1 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 90.6 88.4 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 96.8 94.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 96.5 97.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 90.4 78.7 February 90.9 96.5 74.1 79.2 92.8 97.8 84.9 77.3 March 90.6 96.4 73.8 76.6 92.2 99.1 82.5 79.6 April 90.7 96.5 74.6 76.1 93.2 101.4 83.8 78.3 May 89.1 95.9 69.7 72.3 90.8 101.5 77.8 75.1 June 89.1 96.3 68.6 72.7 92.9 99.8 84.0 75.8 July 88.2 96.0 66.2 69.6 92.3 99.9 82.4 77.1 August 88.3 95.8 67.4 69.1 91.7 99.6 81.6 72.0 September 87.5 95.5 65.6 66.7 92.7 97.5 85.2 73.1 October 87.4 95.4 65.7 65.7 92.0 97.0 84.1 70.1 November 87.7 95.9 65.9 65.4 93.8 98.7 88.0 65.0 December 86.9 95.4 64.2 63.7 91.5 97.4 81.9 77.5 2006January 86.7 95.0 63.1 67.2 90.5 96.4 80.7 68.8 February 85.1 94.4 58.4 63.0 91.1 96.6 82.5 63.5 March 85.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • 81.9 41.8 27.3 19.6 Louisiana 87.6 81.1 28.5 20.0 14.0 Maine 86.8 79.7 54.4 36.3 7.3 Maryland 86.6 74.5 47.4 39.8 33.9 Massachusetts 89.0 77.9 50.1 44.0 36.1 Michigan 86.2 74.9 42.0 33.8 10.1 Minnesota 89.6 78.4 44.7 37.9 20.0 Mississippi 91.7 62.8 22.5 11.4 3.2 Missouri 88.9 80.8 34.1 22.7 6.4 Montana 76.5 53.5 31.6 25.7 2.4 Nebraska 84.6 69.1 43.7 29.3 17.2 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 42 27 Table 20 - Continued Percentage of Connections by Downstream Speed by State as of December 31, 2010 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over 200 kbps Upstream and State % over 200 kbps Downstream % at least 768 kbps
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-206A1.txt
  • v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 556, 594, 602, �� 88, 108 (1998); Infonxx, Inc. v. New York Tel. Co., FCC 97-359, File No. E-96-26, 1997 WL 621592, � 16 (1997); Beehive Tel., Inc. v. Bell Operating Companies, 10 FCC Rcd 10562, 10566, �� 23-24 (1995), affirmed after voluntary remand, 12 FCC Rcd 17930 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.1, et seq. In the Access Charge Reform Docket, we acknowledged that CLEC access rates may ``be higher due to the CLECs' high start-up costs for building new networks, their small geographical service areas, and the limited number of subscribers over which CLECs can distribute costs.'' Access Charge Reform, Fifth Report and Order and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.txt
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. These rules tell the incumbent LECs the precise manner in which they may assess interstate access charges on interexchange carriers and end users. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels incumbents may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47 C.F.R. �� 65.1 - 65.830 (relating to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-181A1.txt
  • Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 261 (1946). United States v. Commodities Trading Corp., 339 U.S. at 124. United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. at 373. United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 374 (1942). Id. at 374; United States v. Commodities Trading Corp., 339 U.S. at 123. Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. V. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 476, 486 (1984). United States v. 69.1 Acres of Land, 942 F.2d 290, 294 (4th Cir. 1991). Seravalli, et al. v. United States, 845 F.2d 1571, 1574-1575 (Fed. Cir. 1988). As Complainant points out, the majority of states that have certified to regulate pole attachment rates rely on an historic cost methodology. Complainant cites Cal. Pub. Util. Code � 767.5 (1999); Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-185A1.txt
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. Finally, Part 61 requires ILECs to publish their rates in tariffs, and the rules restrict how and when incumbents may change their rates. See 47 C.F.R. �� 61.1 - 61.193. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels ILECs may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.txt
  • service. The LRN is a unique ten-digit number assigned to each central office switch to identify each switch in the network for call routing purposes. Id. Carriers use telephone numbers for many other access-related services such as billing, maintenance, administration, and various forms of record keeping. See Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 10384, para. 138. See generally, 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. See First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 7625, para. 122. See LNP Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11726-27, para. 41 (citing LNP First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8419-20). See id. See id. at 11727, para. 43 (citing LNP First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8420-21). See id. at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-161A1.txt
  • associated with regulated telecommunications services and those associated with nonregulated activities, 47 C.F.R. �� 64.901- 64.904; determine the fraction of regulated expenses and investment that should be allocated to the interstate jurisdiction, 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1- 36.741; and then translate these interstate costs into charges for specific interstate access services according to part 69 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.731. See Rate-of-Return Access Charge Reform Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 19624, para. 19. See Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6786 (1990) (LEC Price Cap Order). See LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6787, para. 2. Id. See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12967,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.txt
  • refiled complaints for administrative convenience. See Letter from Radhika V. Karmarkar, Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to all counsel, File Nos. EB-02-MD-018 - 030 (rel. May 1, 2002) (``May 1, 2002 Letter Ruling'') at 5. 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 203(c). Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996) (the ``Act''). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. (1987 - 1997). Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references to Part 69 of the Commission's rules refer to the rules in effect prior to April 15, 1997. ``Citizens'' refers collectively to Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company, Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company of California, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • group tend to have a relatively higher monthly rate and number of channels, and a relatively lower rate per channel. Table 4. Competitive Differential by System Size� Group Average Monthly Rate�� Number of Channels Rate per Channel Large Medium Small Large Medium Small Large Medium Small Noncompetitive $41.53 $40.26 $37.13 67.3 63.2 50.3 $0.625 $0.651 $0.792 Competitive $40.17 $39.34 $31.91 69.1 61.9 46.7 $0.592 $0.651 $0.780 Differential 3.4% 2.3% 16.4% -2.6% 1.3% 3.6% 5.6% 0.0% 1.5% � Large systems have greater than 50,000 subscribers, medium systems have between 10,001 and 50,000 subscribers, and small systems have 10,000 or less subscribers. �� Including programming and equipment. For the competitive group, Table 5 divides the monthly average rate from Table 3 into BST,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.txt
  • Third, the separations rules determine the fraction of the incumbent carrier's regulated expenses and investment that should be allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1-36.741. After the total amount of interstate cost is identified, the access charge rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.731. Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 15992-93, para. 24 (1997) (Access Charge Reform First Report and Order). Access Charge Reform First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16013, para. 77 (``Because common line costs do not vary with usage, these costs should be recovered on a flat-rated instead of per-minute
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.txt
  • 9656, para. 128. See supra para. 100. See supra para. 106. See supra para. 94. See supra paras. 127-33. See supra paras. 139-40. See supra paras. 141-43. 47 CFR � 32.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 36.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 51.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 54.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 61.1 et seq. 47 CFR � 69.1 et seq. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, CC Docket No. 01-92, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 9610 (2001) (Intercarrier Compensation NPRM); Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 05-33 (rel. Mar. 3, 2005)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-79A1.txt
  • NPRM Comments at 5; Qwest NPRM Reply Comments at 20-22; Sprint NPRM Comments at 15-16. See 47 U.S.C. �� 160(a), 254(d); Universal Service FNPRM, 17 FCC Rcd 3752 (2002). See 47 U.S.C. � 160(a)(1). See 47 U.S.C. � 160(a)(2). See 47 U.S.C. � 160(a)(3). See 47 U.S.C. � 160(b). GCI Emergency Petition Comments at 10-11. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. In addition to access charge obligations, we agree with APCC that providers of calling cards are obligated to pay dial-around compensation to payphone service providers pursuant to section 276 of the Act when the cards are used in the provision of telecommunications services. See APCC Comments at 11-12. AT&T NPRM Reply Comments at 9-10. IDT NPRM Comments at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.txt
  • and any such charge, practice, classification or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful.'' Complaint at 4, � 4; Joint Statement, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed June 6, 2007) (``Joint Statement'') at 1, � 2. Joint Statement at 1-2, � 4. Joint Statement at 2, � 5. Joint Statement at 1-2, � 4. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.2. Complaint at 6, � 8; Answer of Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Company, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed May 29, 2007) (``Answer'') at 12, � 8. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.601-69.612. Complaint at 6-7, � 9; Answer at 12, � 9; see 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(d). Complaint at 6-7, � 9; Answer at 12, � 9; see 47 C.F.R. �� 69.604,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.txt
  • of the assignment application and consummation of the sale. Market Concentration Nameloc and Arkansas assert that the Staff Decision failed to give full consideration to market concentration concerns. Arkansas contends that the staff did not address ``specific evidence of market failure - namely, that two firms [Citadel Communications Corp. and Clear Channel Communications] in the Little Rock market presently control 69.1 percent of the market's advertising revenue.'' Arkansas asserts that such market concentration rises to the standard of the ``50/70 screen'' then used by the staff to ``flag'' applications with possible concentration issues. Arkansas appears to conclude from these facts that a hearing is needed to determine whether anti-competitive market conditions and the loss of a female/minority-owned station warrant a denial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.txt
  • 97 FCC 2d at 735-40, paras. 129-34, 137-43. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.301-.502; see also Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6786, 6787, para. 1 (1990) (LEC Price Cap Order). The rate-of-return regulations are set forth in Part 69 of our rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-701. Price cap regulation was mandatory for the BOCs and GTE and optional for other incumbent local exchange carriers. See LEC Price Cap Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6818-20, paras. 257-79; see also Access Charge Reform; Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchanges Carriers; Interexchange Carrier Purchases of Switch Access Services Offered by Competitive Local Exchange Carriers; Petition of U.S. West
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • Census Blocks POPs Contained in Rural Census Blocks % of Total U.S. POPs Square Miles Contained in Those Blocks % of Total U.S. Square Miles Total for Rural U.S. 4,169,790 60,836,650 21.3% 3,367,687 88.6% % of Total Rural U.S. POPs % of Total Rural U.S. Square Miles 1 or More 3,539,318 56,991,088 93.7 1,788,137 53.1 2 or More 2,212,589 42,024,607 69.1 855,268 25.4 3 or More 904,648 23,158,908 38.1 222,982 6.6 4 or More 295,099 10,509,664 17.3 52,305 1.6 Mobile Broadband Coverage in Rural Areas ). shows that non-rural CMAs generally have more providers offering service than rural CMAs. For instance, 16 percent of rural CMAs have only two providers offering service in at least some part of the CMA, whereas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Rural Census Blocks POPs Contained in Rural Census Blocks % of Total U.S. POPsSquare Miles Contained in Those Blocks % of Total U.S. Square Miles Total for Rural U.S. 4,169,790 60,836,650 21.3% 3,367,687 88.6% % of Total Rural U.S. POPs % of Total Rural U.S. Square Miles 1 or More 3,539,318 56,991,088 93.7 1,788,137 53.1 2 or More 2,212,589 42,024,607 69.1 855,268 25.4 3 or More 904,648 23,158,908 38.1 222,982 6.6 4 or More 295,099 10,509,664 17.3 52,305 1.6 Chart 49 Mobile Broadband Coverage in Rural Areas 98.5% 91.9% 81.7% 67.8% 93.7% 69.1% 38.1% 17.3% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 1 or more 2 or more 3 or more 4 or more Number of Providers Percentage of PopulationCovered Total U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.txt
  • (paid on long distance calls within a state). See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.301-.502; see also Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6786, 6787, para. 1 (1990) (LEC Price Cap Order). The rate-of-return regulations are set forth in Part 69 of our rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-701. See, e.g., Digital Crossroads 10-15. 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152(a), 154(i). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. Part 36. In the 1980's, the Commission adopted a rule allocating a fixed amount-25%-of loop cost to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. � 36.154(c). Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, CC Docket No. 87-313, Second Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6786,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • the voice call signaling and transmission technology used by the carrier or VoIP provider. * * * * * PART 69-ACCESS CHARGES The authority citation for part 69 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403. 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, 220, 254, 403. Add paragraph (d) to �69.1 to read as follows: �69.1 Application of access charges. * * * * * (d) To the extent any provision contained in part 51 subparts H and J conflict with any provision of this part, the part 51 provision supersedes the provision of this part. * * * * * Revise �69.3paaragraphs (e)(6) and (e)(9) and add paragraph (e)(12) to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-164A1.txt
  • Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (17625,) Tj 1 0 0 1 144.45 132.75 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (para. 9;) Tj 1 0 0 1 177.35 132.75 Tm /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Federal-State Joint Conference on Advanced Telecommunications Services,) Tj 1 0 0 1 486.45 132.5 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (CC Docket) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 120.75 Tm 100 Tz (No. 99-294, Order, 18 FCC Rcd) Tj 1 0 0 1 202.05 121 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (27065,) Tj 1 0 0 1 232.05 121 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (27066 para.) Tj 1 0 0 1 282.449 120.75 Tm 77 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (5) Tj 1 0 0 1 290.15 121
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.txt
  • 95 Tz (for its contracts.3) Tj 1 0 0 1 149.5 317.099 Tm 100 Tz (USAC further found that Houston ISD had met with ACS during the bidding period) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 304.599 Tm (and accepted gifis from ACS.4 Upon review of the record, we find that Houston ISD and ACS violated) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 291.899 Tm (the Commission's competitive bidding rules, and that E-rate funds should not have been committed or) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 279.149 Tm 99 Tz (disbursed to ACS or its successors, including Lakehills.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 324.7 278.949 Tm 100 Tz (We therefore affirm USAC's decision to rescind) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 266.449 Tm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-4A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 69.35 312.5 Tm 99 Tz (June 7, 2010\) \(Application for Review\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 299.549 Tm 56 Tz (2) Tj 1 0 0 1 76.049 295 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Universal Service Contribution Methodology; Request for Review by in Contact, Inc. of a Decision by Universal) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 283.449 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (Service Administrator, 25 FCC Rcd 4739 \(Wireline Comp. Bur. 2010\) \(Order\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 265.699 Tm (Petition for Special Relief and Waiver by inContact, Inc. of a Decision of Universal Service Administrator \(filed) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 254.199 Tm 100 Tz (Apr. 13, 2009\). Although inContact framed its
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • Basic cable television subscribership grew from 66.1 million subscribers at the end of 1998 to 67.3 million subscribers at the end of 1999, an increase of 1.8 percent. It continued to grow to an estimated 67.7 million subscribers by June 30, 2000, a six month increase of approximately 0.6 percent. Basic cable penetration grew between 1998 and 1999, increasing from 69.1 percent at the end of 1998 to 69.7 percent at the end of 1999. Basic cable penetration remained unchanged at 69.7 percent at the end of the first half of 2000. The percentage of TV households subscribing to cable continued to increase, rising to 67.3 percent of all TV households by the end of 1999, and to 67.4 percent by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf
  • the cost recovery mechanism for long-term local number portability (LNP) administration.4 Carriers and certain other providers of telecommunications services must satisfy these various requirements by filing different forms or worksheets, containing similar but not identical information, at different times, at different intervals, and in different locations. 1 47 C.F.R. �� 64.601 et seq. 2 47 C.F.R. �� 54.1 et seq., 69.1 et seq. 3 47 C.F.R. �� 52.1 et seq. 4 47 C.F.R. �� 52.21 et seq. 2 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-233 2. Our existing multiple filing requirements impose real burdens on affected parties -- burdens that we can significantly reduce by combining current contributor reporting worksheets into one unified Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet. Besides benefiting reporting entities, adopting a single
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98106.pdf
  • actual voice-grade minutes of use, geographically averaged on a study-area-wide basis, that the incumbent Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-106 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-106 47 C.F.R. � 69.111(c)(1) (emphasis added). 222 See e.g., Access Reform Tariffs Designation Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 2276. 223 Id. at 2278. 224 Id. at 2279. 225 47 C.F.R. � 69.111(c). 226 47 C.F.R. � 69.1(c). 227 Access Reform Tariffs Designation Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 2279. 228 52 local exchange carrier experiences based on the prior year's annual use." 222 129. The majority of the price cap LECs' tariff filings revealed that tandem usage in their study areas exceeded 9,000 minutes per trunk for 1996. The recalculated transport rates for the price cap 223 LECs
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • 834 (1984). These rules are referred to as the Uniform System of Accounts and are contained in Part 32 of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 32.1-.9000. This is governed by sections 64.901-.904 of our Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 64.901-.904. This step is governed by Part 36 of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1-.741. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.731. The general process of separating these costs between the interstate and intrastate jurisdictions is discussed by the Supreme Court in Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133 (1930). See, e.g., Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 16010-11 (1997) (Access Charge Reform Order), aff'd sub. nom., Southwestern Bell v. FCC,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. These rules tell the incumbent LECs the precise manner in which they may assess interstate access charges on interexchange carriers and end users. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels incumbents may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47 C.F.R. �� 65.1 - 65.830 (relating to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.wp
  • a reference from one document to another. On the World Wide Web, a user can select a link on one page and "jump" to a second page referenced by that link. Telemessaging/Electronic Publishing Order, at para. 46 n.114, citing Wired Style: Principles of English Usage in the Digital Age (Hale ed., 1996) at 49-50. Id. 260 See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. (Part 69). The Part 69 rules are designed to be consistent with the Commission's jurisdictional separations rules that govern the allocation of incumbent LECs' expenses and investment between the interstate and state jurisdictions. See Part 36 of the Commission's Rules; 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 et seq. 261 MTS and WATS Market Structure, Docket No. 78-72, Memorandum Opinion and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.txt
  • they are not considered to be ``telecommunications carriers.'' Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 12 FCC Rcd 8776, �� 788-90 (1997). Pursuant to section 251(a) of the 1996 Act, all telecommunications carriers must ``interconnect directly or indirectly with the facilities and equipment of other telecommunications carriers.'' Section 251(c)(2) imposes additional interconnection obligations on incumbent LECs. See generally 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. MTS and WATS Market Structure, 97 FCC 2d 682, 711-22 (1983). Downes, Thomas and Shane Greenstein, ``Do Commercial ISPs Provide Universal Access,'' (Dec. 1998), available at http://skew2.kellogg.nwu.edu/~greenste/research/papers/tprcbook.pdf. POP stands for Point of Presence and refers to the number of local nodes for dial-up access that the ISP has deployed. Although business telephone lines may feature metered usage rates
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209958-1.pdf
  • YES Volume Control Resets when placed YES YES NO back on-hook? Employs conventional circuitry? ? ? El Figure 1: Comparison of Tested Units Note 1. Sample "C" is 6 dB quieter than nominal at the minimum volume control. PARAMETER SAMPLE "A- SAMPLE `B" SAMPLE `C" Noise at Minimum 41.4 46.7 31.0 < 40 dB SPL (A) Noise at Maximum 64.1 69.1 56.6 (No Spec.) dB SPL (A) Transmit Loudness (TOLR) -45.6 -46.6 -44.1 -48 +8, -5 dB ROLR Loudness at Minimum 42.3 43.5 52.0 +46 f 5 dB ROLR Loudness at Maximum 22.9 25.2 28.5 dB SPL Level at Minimum 95.5 96.9 87.7 dB SPL (1 kHz) SPL Level at Maximum 116.2 115.7 111.5 dB SPL (1 kHz) Volume Control Range
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210007-2.pdf
  • Spec.) dB SPL (A) Transmit Loudness (TOLR) -48 +8, -5 dB ROLR Loudness at Minimum +46+5dB ROLR Loudness at Maximum dB SPL Level at Minimum dB SPL (1 kHz) SPL Level at Maximum dB SPL (1 kHz) Volume Control Range Calculated using ROLR Proposed > 20 dB Volume Control Range Calculated using SPL Proposed > 20 dB 41.4 46.7 64.1 69.1 -45.6 -46.6 42.3 43.5 22.9 25.2 95.5 96.9 116.2 115.7 19.4 18.3 20.7 18.8 Figure2: Summary of Measurements 31 .o 56.6 -44.1 52.0 28.5 87.7 111.5 23.5 23.9 - 2.5 - Note: Since ROLR and TOLR are calculated using losses the more neaative the ROLR or TOLR the louder the telephone. - 26 - SAMPLE "A" Volume Control Range -1;/1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22497, 22555 (1998); Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 01-78 (rel. Mar. 7, 2001). See Appendix A for a list of the parties. 47 U.S.C. � 201(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references are to the 2000 edition. We refer to prior C.F.R. editions in instances where the prior rules were different than the current rules. C.F. Communications Corp., et al. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Remand, 15 FCC Rcd 8759 (2000) (``Liability Order''); recon. denied, 15
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01185.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01185.html
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. Finally, Part 61 requires ILECs to publish their rates in tariffs, and the rules restrict how and when incumbents may change their rates. See 47 C.F.R. �� 61.1 - 61.193. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels ILECs may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1890A1.html
  • al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098, 1109 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3671, 5. See also Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2225, 2226 (EB 2002), at 3 (``Second Waiver Order''). 5 Second Waiver Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 2226, 3. 6
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-259A1.html
  • the Secretary of the Commission shall cause to have this Order published in the Federal Register. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint. 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 2 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 3 See C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97- 1202, slip. op (D.C. Cir. 1997); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc. et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 7334, 7335-36 (1993); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc.,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
  • complaints for administrative convenience. See Letter from Radhika V. Karmarkar, Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to all counsel, File Nos. EB-02-MD- 018 - 030 (rel. May 1, 2002) (``May 1, 2002 Letter Ruling'') at 5. 2 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c). Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996) (the ``Act''). 3 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. (1987 - 1997). Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references to Part 69 of the Commission's rules refer to the rules in effect prior to April 15, 1997. 4 ``Citizens'' refers collectively to Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company, Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company of California,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2000A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1450A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2865A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. f/k/a South Central Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-023 (filed January 14, 2004). Because the Commission order assessing liability in this case was on appeal to the D.C. Circuit at the time this motion was filed, we deferred ruling
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2866A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a TDS Telcom, Communications Corporation of Indiana d/b/a TDS Telcom, and Home Telephone Company of Pittsboro, Inc., Supplement to Formal complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-025 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3167A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3476A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3477A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2. Communications Vending corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-029 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Payphone Systems v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-4022A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1972A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3 Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed April 11, 2005). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1974A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-022 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Notice of Settlement
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1975A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB- 02-MD-028 (filed April 26, 2002). 3 NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-028 (filed May 17, 2005). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1976A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD- 021 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3 Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3072A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety and the proceedings ARE TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation f/k/a US West Communications, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-019 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); IMR Capital Corporation v. Verizon New England, Inc. f/k/a New England Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-020 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Verizon North, Inc.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-674A1.html
  • (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back for statute of limitations purposes to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8; Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2115 (EB 2002) (``Second Waiver Order''); Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • and any such charge, practice, classification or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful." Complaint at 4, P: 4; Joint Statement, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed June 6, 2007) ("Joint Statement") at 1, P: 2. Joint Statement at 1-2, P: 4. Joint Statement at 2, P: 5. Joint Statement at 1-2, P: 4. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.1-69.2. Complaint at 6, P: 8; Answer of Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Company, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed May 29, 2007) ("Answer") at 12, P: 8. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.601-69.612. Complaint at 6-7, P: 9; Answer at 12, P: 9; see 47 C.F.R. S: 69.3(d). Complaint at 6-7, P: 9; Answer at 12, P: 9; see 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.604,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-5A1.html
  • the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19975, 19990, P: 32 (2003); see also Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc. v. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., 423 F.3d 1056, 1067-70 (9th Cir. 2005) (and Commission orders cited therein), aff'd, Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., 550 U.S. 45 (2007). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. S: 203; 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.1 - 69.731; see n.32, supra. See generally 2001 CLEC Access Charge Reform Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 9957 (stating that "our tariff rules were historically intended to protect purchasers of service from monopoly providers, not to protect sellers from monopsony purchasing power"); In the Matter of Communique Telecommunications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 13635, 13649, P: 26
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00206.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00206.txt
  • v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 556, 594, 602, �� 88, 108 (1998); Infonxx, Inc. v. New York Tel. Co., FCC 97-359, File No. E-96-26, 1997 WL 621592, � 16 (1997); Beehive Tel., Inc. v. Bell Operating Companies, 10 FCC Rcd 10562, 10566, �� 23-24 (1995), affirmed after voluntary remand, 12 FCC Rcd 17930 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.1, et seq. In the Access Charge Reform Docket, we acknowledged that CLEC access rates may ``be higher due to the CLECs' high start-up costs for building new networks, their small geographical service areas, and the limited number of subscribers over which CLECs can distribute costs.'' Access Charge Reform, Fifth Report and Order and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
  • 93.9 Mar-00 30 37 18 14 34.262.390.6 Mar-01 30 35 16 14 40.266.890.9 Milwaukee - Racine Mar-96 28 34 22 16 27.5 n/a 68.5 Nov-97 29 35 17 16 30.4n/a 81.1 Nov-98 31 35 16 16 29.7 n/a 80.2 Mar-00 31 35 16 17 23.446.276.1 Mar-01 31 35 15 17 27.651.286.5 San Antonio TX Mar-96 34 33 16 13 23.7n/a 69.1 Nov-97 34 33 16 14 28.8n/a 81.5 Nov-98 34 34 17 12 32.6 n/a 85.1 Mar-00 32 38 20 12 30.750.682.4 Mar-01 32 39 18 11 32.652.083.3 Middlesex-Somerset-Union NJ Mar-96n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nov-97n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nov-98n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mar-00n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mar-01 33 5
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033c.pdf
  • 601 Schedule I Supplement 4 Frequency Data Transmitter Location Information 1) Transmit Location Name: KNOBHILL 2) Path Number: 1 Frequency Information 3) Action A/M/D 4) Lower or Center Frequency (MHZ) 5) Upper Frequency (MHZ) 6) Tolerance (%) 7) EIRP (dBm) 8 Emission Designator 9) Digital Modulation Rate (kbps) 10) Digital Modulation Type Existing (if mod) A New 7112.5 71177112711 0.00200 69.1 20M0D7W 976.8 64 QAM 11) Transmitter Manufacturer 12) Transmitter Model 13) Automatic Transmitter Power Control RADIOCOMM INC ABC- 12345A Y 3) Action A/M/D 4) Lower or Center Frequency (MHz) 5) Upper Frequency (MHz) 6) Tolerance (%) 7) EIRP (dBm) 8 Emission Designator 9) Digital Modulation Rate (kbps) 10) Digital Modulatio n Type Existing (if mod) New 11) Transmitter Manufacturer 12)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • Basic cable television subscribership grew from 66.1 million subscribers at the end of 1998 to 67.3 million subscribers at the end of 1999, an increase of 1.8 percent. It continued to grow to an estimated 67.7 million subscribers by June 30, 2000, a six month increase of approximately 0.6 percent. Basic cable penetration grew between 1998 and 1999, increasing from 69.1 percent at the end of 1998 to 69.7 percent at the end of 1999. Basic cable penetration remained unchanged at 69.7 percent at the end of the first half of 2000. The percentage of TV households subscribing to cable continued to increase, rising to 67.3 percent of all TV households by the end of 1999, and to 67.4 percent by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.wp
  • the cost recovery mechanism for long-term local number portability (LNP) administration.4 Carriers and certain other providers of telecommunications services must satisfy these various requirements by filing different forms or worksheets, containing similar but not identical information, at different times, at different intervals, and in different locations. 1 47 C.F.R. �� 64.601 et seq. 2 47 C.F.R. �� 54.1 et seq., 69.1 et seq. 3 47 C.F.R. �� 52.1 et seq. 4 47 C.F.R. �� 52.21 et seq. 2 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-233 2. Our existing multiple filing requirements impose real burdens on affected parties -- burdens that we can significantly reduce by combining current contributor reporting worksheets into one unified Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet. Besides benefiting reporting entities, adopting a single
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/err97158.wp
  • sooner than June 15, 1997: 47 CFR 61.45, 61.47, 69.104, 69.126, 69.151, and 69.152. The following rules, or amendments thereto, shall be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register: 47 CFR 69.103, 69.107, 69.122, 69.303, and 69.304. The following rules, or amendments thereto, in this Report and Order shall be effective January 1, 1998: 47 CFR 61.3, 61.46, 69.1, 69.2, 69.105, 69.123, 69.124, 69.125, 69.154, 69.155, 69.157, 69.305, 69.306, 69.309, 69.401, 69.411, 69.502, and 69.611. The following rules, which impose new or modified information or collection requirements, shall become effective upon approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), but no sooner than January 1, 1998: 47 CFR 61.42, 61.48, 69.4, 69.106, 69.111, 69.153, 69.156. Unless otherwise stated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98106.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98106.wp
  • actual voice-grade minutes of use, geographically averaged on a study-area-wide basis, that the incumbent Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-106 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-106 47 C.F.R. � 69.111(c)(1) (emphasis added). 222 See e.g., Access Reform Tariffs Designation Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 2276. 223 Id. at 2278. 224 Id. at 2279. 225 47 C.F.R. � 69.111(c). 226 47 C.F.R. � 69.1(c). 227 Access Reform Tariffs Designation Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 2279. 228 52 local exchange carrier experiences based on the prior year's annual use." 222 129. The majority of the price cap LECs' tariff filings revealed that tandem usage in their study areas exceeded 9,000 minutes per trunk for 1996. The recalculated transport rates for the price cap 223 LECs
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99175.pdf
  • Reconsideration and Fourth Report and Order, FCC 93-463, CC Docket No. 90-571, 9 FCC Rcd 1637 (rel. Sept. 29, 1993) (clarifying that TRS Fund contributions may be treated as exogenous costs under price cap regulation). To this end, we believe that AT&T's suggestion concerning price cap reductions would be more appropriately considered in access charge proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1. See also LNP Cost Recovery Order, � 109 (suggesting that incumbent LECs would likely pass on shared costs of number portability to IXCs through exogenous treatment in their access rates). 145 Id. 31 information that we need to collect from contributors.141 63. We are unpersuaded by MCI's contention that the end-user telecommunications revenue method is not competitively neutral simply because
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00133.doc
  • Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. Telebeam Telephone Turtle Lake Telephone Co. United Telephone Co. of Florida United Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania Utelco, Inc. Wisconsin Bell, Inc. The parties to this proceeding are listed in Appendix A to this Order. 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a). Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996) (the Act). 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references herein are to the 1998 edition. We refer to prior C.F.R. provisions in instances where the prior rules were different than the current rules. C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (Appeals Court Decision); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97-1202, slip op. (D.C. Cir. 1997).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
  • 834 (1984). These rules are referred to as the Uniform System of Accounts and are contained in Part 32 of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 32.1-.9000. This is governed by sections 64.901-.904 of our Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 64.901-.904. This step is governed by Part 36 of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1-.741. 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1-69.731. The general process of separating these costs between the interstate and intrastate jurisdictions is discussed by the Supreme Court in Smith v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133 (1930). See, e.g., Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15982, 16010-11 (1997) (Access Charge Reform Order), aff'd sub. nom., Southwestern Bell v. FCC,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00306.pdf
  • are percentages of gross book cost. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPENDIX Schedule of Annual Percentages of Depreciation for PAGE 2 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC. - Idaho Effective January 1, 2000 Average Future Remaining Remaining Net Accumulated Life Rate Category Description Life Salvage Depreciation Rate ----------------------------------- -------------- ---------- ------------------ ----------------- (years) (%) (%) (%) A B C D=(100%-B-C)/A 2112 MOTOR VEHICLES 3.2 10 69.1 6.5 2115 GARAGE WORK EQ 6.0 0 46.1 9.0 2116 OTHER WORK EQ 5.6 0 43.5 10.1 2121 BUILDINGS 21.0 0 32.9 3.2 2122 FURNITURE 5.6 0 54.4 8.1 2123.1 OFFICE SUPPORT EQ 2.8 0 34.3 23.5 2123.2 COMPANY COMMUN EQ 5.6 0 53.1 8.4 2124 GEN PURPOSE COMPUTERS 2.9 0 86.1 4.8 2212 DIGITAL ELECTRONIC SW 6.8 0 46.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. These rules tell the incumbent LECs the precise manner in which they may assess interstate access charges on interexchange carriers and end users. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels incumbents may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47 C.F.R. �� 65.1 - 65.830 (relating to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0610_tables.doc
  • Isl * * * * * Ohio 81.3 66.4 37.5 27.5 5.7 Oklahoma 91.3 84.9 34.5 19.8 16.4 Oregon 90.9 79.9 44.7 38.5 26.6 Pennsylvania 86.7 74.6 45.8 34.9 29.8 Puerto Rico 88.2 74.6 21.4 1.4 0.1 Rhode Island 88.6 78.8 54.0 49.3 45.4 South Carolina 82.2 68.2 38.9 29.5 7.8 South Dakota 76.9 55.2 43.1 26.8 24.4 Tennessee 84.5 69.1 36.0 28.3 17.8 Texas 88.6 78.5 33.8 23.6 8.5 Utah 90.6 77.2 35.7 29.6 21.9 Vermont 84.6 74.7 48.5 35.0 13.7 Virgin Islands 85.7 57.7 * * * Virginia 84.1 69.8 42.7 34.9 29.4 Washington 90.2 78.9 43.4 38.2 30.9 West Virginia 88.0 81.1 42.1 27.2 19.0 Wisconsin 89.2 78.6 44.9 30.9 6.5 Wyoming 81.4 54.2 36.1 28.8 1.6 Total
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1210_tables.doc
  • 81.9 41.8 27.3 19.6 Louisiana 87.6 81.1 28.5 20.0 14.0 Maine 86.8 79.7 54.4 36.3 7.3 Maryland 86.6 74.5 47.4 39.8 33.9 Massachusetts 89.0 77.9 50.1 44.0 36.1 Michigan 86.2 74.9 42.0 33.8 10.1 Minnesota 89.6 78.4 44.7 37.9 20.0 Mississippi 91.7 62.8 22.5 11.4 3.2 Missouri 88.9 80.8 34.1 22.7 6.4 Montana 76.5 53.5 31.6 25.7 2.4 Nebraska 84.6 69.1 43.7 29.3 17.2 Table 20 - Continued Percentage of Connections by Downstream Speed by State as of December 31, 2010 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over 200 kbps Upstream and State % over 200 kbps Downstream % at least 768 kbps Downstream % at least 3 mbps Downstream % at least 6 mbps Downstream % at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
  • 75.3 11.9 0.1 7.3 5.4 1Q89 9,326 1,625 21 984 951 12,906 72.3 12.6 0.2 7.6 7.4 2Q89 9,251 1,719 26 1,038 965 12,998 71.2 13.2 0.2 8.0 7.4 3Q89 9,175 1,792 31 1,111 978 13,087 70.1 13.7 0.2 8.5 7.5 4Q89 9,239 1,835 32 1,191 992 13,289 69.5 13.8 0.2 9.0 7.5 1Q90 9,511 2,001 34 1,215 1,007 13,768 69.1 14.5 0.2 8.8 7.3 2Q90 9,553 2,061 37 1,239 1,026 13,916 68.6 14.8 0.3 8.9 7.4 3Q90 9,626 2,197 43 1,279 1,046 14,191 67.8 15.5 0.3 9.0 7.4 4Q90 9,693 2,197 41 1,331 1,067 14,329 67.6 15.3 0.3 9.3 7.4 1Q91 9,594 2,283 134 1,339 1,086 14,436 66.5 15.8 0.9 9.3 7.5 2Q91 9,637 2,354 142 1,358 1,120 14,611 66.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
  • 75.3 11.9 0.1 7.3 5.4 1Q89 9,326 1,625 21 984 951 12,906 72.3 12.6 0.2 7.6 7.4 2Q89 9,251 1,719 26 1,038 965 12,998 71.2 13.2 0.2 8.0 7.4 3Q89 9,175 1,792 31 1,111 978 13,087 70.1 13.7 0.2 8.5 7.5 4Q89 9,239 1,835 32 1,191 992 13,289 69.5 13.8 0.2 9.0 7.5 1Q90 9,511 2,001 34 1,215 1,007 13,768 69.1 14.5 0.2 8.8 7.3 2Q90 9,553 2,061 37 1,239 1,026 13,916 68.6 14.8 0.3 8.9 7.4 3Q90 9,626 2,197 43 1,279 1,046 14,191 67.8 15.5 0.3 9.0 7.4 4Q90 9,693 2,197 41 1,331 1,067 14,329 67.6 15.3 0.3 9.3 7.4 1Q91 9,594 2,283 134 1,339 1,086 14,436 66.5 15.8 0.9 9.3 7.5 2Q91 9,637 2,354 142 1,358 1,120 14,611 66.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris00.pdf
  • 87.9 87.6 88.2 89.0 91.6 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1 All Households 85.9 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris01.pdf
  • 87.9 87.6 88.2 89.0 91.6 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1 All Households 85.9 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris02.pdf
  • 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 93.8 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 93.8 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • 96.9 95.3 97.0 98.9 97.4 93.9 93.4 92.1 93.3 92.6 92.4 92.3 94.7 95.1 93.2 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 12 Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 88.6 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 91.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 94.1 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 95.7 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9 76.4 70.4 82.1 86.6 December 76.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • October 100.0 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 100.0 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 100.0 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 100.0 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 100.0 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 100.0 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 100.0 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 100.0 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 100.0 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 100.0 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 100.0 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 100.0 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 100.0 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 100.0 88.8 95.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 88.8 95.4 95.2 104.0 67.0 80.9 92.4 December 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Residence Switched Toll Service Intrastate Residence Switched Toll Service Interstate Residence Switched Toll Service International Residence Switched Toll Service Business Switched Toll Service Business Switched Access Toll Service NAICS Series ID 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 88.8 95.4 95.2 104.0 67.0 80.9 92.4 December 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 63.9 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9 76.4 70.4 82.1 86.6 December 76.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 71 Table 4.2 Consumer Price Indices (1982 - 1984 = 100) All Goods & Services Telephone Services Local ServicesInterstate Toll Service Intrastate Toll Service BLS Series IdentifierCUUR0000SA0CUUR0000SE270A CUUR0000SEED01 CUUR0000SS27051CUUR0000SS27061 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979 January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9 76.4 70.4 82.1 86.6 December 76.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 76.0 70.0 82.6 85.6 May 64.5 76.0 69.9 82.6 85.5 June 65.2 76.0 69.9 82.7 85.5 July 65.7 76.1 70.1 82.7 85.5 August 66.0 76.3 70.4 82.7 85.6 September 66.5 76.3 70.5 82.7 85.7 October 67.1 76.2 70.1 82.7 85.6 November 67.4 76.2 70.2 82.7 85.6 December 67.7 76.4 70.2 82.7 86.5 1979 January 68.3 75.9 69.6 82.3 86.1 February 69.1 75.7 69.5 82.1 86.0 March 69.8 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 April 70.6 75.7 69.4 82.0 86.0 May 71.5 75.7 69.6 82.0 86.0 June 72.3 75.6 69.2 82.1 86.4 July 73.1 75.7 69.2 82.1 86.5 August 73.8 75.9 69.5 82.2 86.6 September 74.6 75.8 69.4 82.1 86.6 October 75.2 75.1 68.3 82.1 86.8 November 75.9 76.4 70.4 82.1 86.6 December 76.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • DELAWARE 100.0 1.00 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 100.0 1.00 FLORIDA 98.4 1.02 GEORGIA 89.8 1.11 HAWAII 100.0 1.00 IDAHO 90.5 1.10 ILLINOIS 97.7 1.02 INDIANA 95.7 1.04 IOWA 82.6 1.21 KANSAS 84.4 1.18 KENTUCKY 87.1 1.15 LOUISIANA 92.9 1.08 MAINE 83.9 1.19 MARYLAND 99.8 1.00 MASSACHUSETTS 99.9 1.00 MICHIGAN 96.5 1.04 MINNESOTA 74.1 1.35 MISSISSIPPI 93.6 1.07 MISSOURI 94.8 1.05 MONTANA 69.1 1.45 NEBRASKA 86.3 1.16 NEVADA 95.6 1.05 NEW HAMPSHIRE 93.8 1.07 NEW JERSEY 99.8 1.00 NEW MEXICO 90.2 1.11 NEW YORK 96.9 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 86.5 1.16 NORTH DAKOTA 62.1 1.61 OHIO 95.3 1.05 OKLAHOMA 88.4 1.13 OREGON 92.0 1.09 PENNSYLVANIA 95.6 1.05 RHODE ISLAND 100.0 1.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 73.8 1.36 SOUTH DAKOTA 65.5 1.53 TENNESSEE 87.5 1.14 TEXAS 94.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1196.pdf
  • $40,000 - $49,999 98.6 98.8 98.9 99.1 96.6 96.8 96.1 96.1 $50,000 - $59,999 99.1 99.4 99.1 99.4 99.3 100.0 97.0 97.9 $60,000 - $74,999 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.5 97.2 98.2 $75,000 + 99.0 99.3 99.0 99.3 97.9 99.2 98.6 98.6 JULY 95 TOTAL 94.0 95.3 95.2 96.3 86.9 89.2 86.2 88.2 UNDER $5,000 76.6 81.2 80.5 84.0 69.1 75.4 75.2 78.5 $5,000 - $7,499 83.0 86.1 84.5 87.8 80.5 82.8 71.2 73.8 $7,500 - $9,999 87.3 89.4 89.2 91.0 81.9 85.5 74.2 77.2 $10,000 - $12,499 89.0 92.0 90.6 93.3 81.3 86.2 84.9 87.8 $12,500 - $14,999 92.3 94.2 93.3 94.9 88.4 91.8 85.4 87.0 $15,000 - $19,999 93.0 94.8 94.0 95.6 88.5 91.3 84.0 86.8 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
  • $40,000 - $49,999 98.6 98.8 98.9 99.1 96.6 96.8 96.1 96.1 $50,000 - $59,999 99.1 99.4 99.1 99.4 99.3 100.0 97.0 97.9 $60,000 - $74,999 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.5 97.2 98.2 $75,000 + 99.0 99.3 99.0 99.3 97.9 99.2 98.6 98.6 JULY 95 TOTAL 94.0 95.3 95.2 96.3 86.9 89.2 86.2 88.2 UNDER $5,000 76.6 81.2 80.5 84.0 69.1 75.4 75.2 78.5 $5,000 - $7,499 83.0 86.1 84.5 87.8 80.5 82.8 71.2 73.8 $7,500 - $9,999 87.3 89.4 89.2 91.0 81.9 85.5 74.2 77.2 $10,000 - $12,499 89.0 92.0 90.6 93.3 81.3 86.2 84.9 87.8 $12,500 - $14,999 92.3 94.2 93.3 94.9 88.4 91.8 85.4 87.0 $15,000 - $19,999 93.0 94.8 94.0 95.6 88.5 91.3 84.0 86.8 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 2.30 12.2 Evening 1.22 1.13 (7.4) 1.22 2.30 88.5 Night & Weekend 0.82 0.73 (11.0) 0.82 2.30 180.5 125 - 292 Day 2.14 $1.48 (30.8) 2.14 2.30 7.5 Evening 1.28 1.13 (11.7) 1.28 2.30 79.7 Night & Weekend 0.85 0.73 (14.1) 0.85 2.30 170.6 293 - 430 Day 2.27 $1.48 (34.8) 2.27 2.30 1.3 Evening 1.36 1.13 (16.9) 1.36 2.30 69.1 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.73 (18.9) 0.90 2.30 155.6 431 - 925 Day 2.34 $1.48 (36.8) 2.34 2.30 (1.7) Evening 1.40 1.13 (19.3) 1.40 2.30 64.3 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.73 (21.5) 0.93 2.30 147.3 926 - 1910 Day 2.40 $1.48 (38.3) 2.40 2.30 (4.2) Evening 1.44 1.13 (21.5) 1.44 2.30 59.7 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.73 (24.0) 0.96 2.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 6 Table 16.5 Total Telecommunications Revenues by State (Dollar Amounts Shown in Millions) Alabama $2,668 $2,946 $3,205 $3,394 $3,712 $4,008 50.2% Alaska 464 518 561 590 664 717 54.5 Arizona 2,842 3,249 3,667 3,958 4,359 4,972 74.9 Arkansas 1,534 1,719 1,885 2,005 2,303 2,315 51.0 California 22,379 25,100 27,236 28,692 29,384 33,577 50.0 Colorado 3,128 3,526 4,006 4,260 4,826 5,290 69.1 Connecticut 2,765 2,943 3,266 3,173 3,405 3,924 41.9 Delaware 492 567 627 685 788 875 77.8 District of Columbia 886 955 1,049 1,085 1,581 1,648 85.9 Florida 11,582 12,972 14,161 15,042 17,223 18,308 58.1 Georgia 5,335 6,004 6,849 7,469 8,479 8,919 67.2 Guam NA 85 97 103 99 108 Hawaii 775 841 930 969 1,009 1,177 51.9 Idaho 791 908
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 0.0 1994 130,192 118,437 91.0 11,755 9.0 0 0.0 1995 136,231 122,975 90.3 13,255 9.7 0 0.0 1996 142,824 125,595 87.9 17,228 12.1 1 0.0 1997 149,429 128,436 86.0 20,992 14.0 0 0.0 1998 172,916 134,629 77.9 38,286 22.1 0 0.0 19992 186,387 138,691 74.4 47,696 25.6 0 0.0 20003 218,928 157,840 72.1 61,086 27.9 2 0.0 2001 220,442 152,394 69.1 68,047 30.9 2 0.0 2002 219,024 140,005 63.9 79,018 36.1 1 0.0 1 Includes some other channels. 2 Southern New England Telephone Company merged with SBC Communications October 26, 1998. Their data are included in this table starting with 1999. 3 Large increase in 2000 is due to the merger of Bell Atlantic and GTE. Source: ARMIS 43-07 report. 17
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-95.pdf
  • of RevenueAs Percent of Revenue Total Intrastate Total Interstate Total Carrier in Revenue Revenue Revenue Category Local Exchange Service $104.6 45.8% $1.7 0.4% $106.3 17.1% 1.6% Local Private Line Service $32.4 14.2 $1.6 0.4 $34.0 5.5 4.7 Cellular, PCS, Paging & Other Mobile ** 0.0 ** 0.0 ** 0.0 100.0 Alternative Access and Other $67.6 29.6 $151.3 38.3 $218.9 35.1 69.1 Total Local Revenues ** 0.0 ** 0.0 ** 0.0 43.1 Interstate Access $0.0 0.0 $221.6 56.2 $221.6 35.6 100.0 Intrastate Access $14.0 6.1 $0.0 0.0 $14.0 2.2 0.0 Total Access Revenues $14.0 6.1 $221.6 56.2 $235.6 37.8 94.1 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card ** 0.0 ** 0.0 ** 0.0 70.0 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service $9.8 4.3 $18.3 4.6 $28.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
  • 2,243.6 8.8 5,791.7 10.2 8,035.2 9.8 72.1 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service 13,559.8 53.3 38,774.7 68.1 52,334.5 63.5 74.1 Long Distance Private Line Service 1,838.4 7.2 7,299.5 12.8 9,138.0 11.1 79.9 All Other Long Distance 733.9 2.9 3,526.1 6.2 4,260.0 5.2 82.8 Total Toll Revenues 18,375.7 72.3 55,392.0 97.3 73,767.7 89.6 75.1 Total Carrier Revenue $25,419.7 100.0 $56,943.4 100.0 $82,363.0 100.0 69.1 Figures may not add due to rounding and amounts that have been withheld to preserve confidentiality of individual carrier data. Telecommunications Industry Table 11B Revenue: AT&T, MCI, Sprint & WorldCom: Reseller and IXC Affiliates Only - Toll Revenue Only (Dollar amounts shown in millions) TRS Fund Worksheet Data 1996 Intrastate Interstate Intrastate + Interstate Interstate as % of Total Revenue
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
  • $3,157,046 64.9 2.2 22.0 10.6 0.2 $1,060,832 0.1 99.5 0.4 0.1 0.0 393,513,974 32.3 15.2 20.1 28.3 4.1 Italy $196,009,374 65.1 1.5 16.9 13.9 2.6 $6,350,304 50.6 0.2 20.5 27.6 1.1 $11,130,708 3.9 93.7 0.0 2.4 0.0 965,784,266 33.4 2.5 19.8 27.7 16.7 Liechtenstein $471,637 23.9 1.5 6.8 59.2 8.7 $0 $0 7,270,691 8.2 1.6 59.0 21.2 10.0 Luxembourg $5,118,046 69.1 1.2 15.5 12.6 1.7 $225,587 56.1 0.0 20.4 22.6 0.8 $74,766 1.8 0.0 0.8 97.4 0.0 33,435,294 57.2 1.8 26.0 11.9 3.1 Malta $3,098,774 46.5 7.0 17.8 17.5 11.2 $93,977 70.3 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.1 $394 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 22,608,801 29.0 10.5 27.6 17.8 15.1 Netherlands $111,368,352 66.1 0.8 14.5 16.4 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.9 3.7 6.2 8.5 5.5 7.5 Jamaica n.a. n.a. 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.2 4.4 Japan n.a. n.a. 26.9 40.0 48.5 49.2 46.6 64.0 92.3 109.5 159.6 Korea, Republic of n.a. n.a. 3.5 5.8 7.7 7.8 9.1 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 Mexico n.a. n.a. 26.9 16.4 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 Morocco n.a. n.a. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Netherlands n.a. n.a. 3.4 4.0 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 Nigeria n.a. n.a. 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 Pakistan n.a. n.a. 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 Peru n.a. n.a. 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.9 4.1 5.2 7.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 2.6 2.9 3.7 6.2 8.5 5.5 7.5 5.8 5.5 4.2 -51.2 Jamaica 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.2 4.4 10.9 6.1 4.5 122.6 Japan 40.0 48.5 49.2 46.6 64.0 92.3 109.5 160.7 189.4 207.3 81.4 -11.7 Korea, Republic of 5.8 7.7 7.8 9.1 13.4 17.6 29.2 52.7 31.8 33.4 13.8 -21.6 Mexico 16.4 16.7 21.5 29.6 29.9 33.9 41.6 69.1 98.7 90.5 53.9 58.7 Morocco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 n.m. Netherlands 4.0 5.9 6.2 9.7 13.6 14.9 15.7 14.7 9.9 9.0 8.4 -43.7 Nigeria 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 5.8 4.7 4.61009.2 Pakistan 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.9 2.0 3.6 4.0 3.0 371.8 Peru 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 93.8 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • October 100.0 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 100.0 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 100.0 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 100.0 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 100.0 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 100.0 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 100.0 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 100.0 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 100.0 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 100.0 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 100.0 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 100.0 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 100.0 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 100.0 88.8 95.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 93.8 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 95.9 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 98.4 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 99.3 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 93.5 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 81.9 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 95.2 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 97.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 99.3 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 96.8 98.7 97.2 108.3 74.2 94.6 105.8 October 95.7 98.9 97.5 107.8 76.4 92.0 102.6 November 94.6 96.3 96.9 102.4 73.2 92.5 102.3 December 94.8 96.2 96.9 104.2 68.3 93.1 103.4 1999January 93.9 97.3 97.2 105.0 72.7 89.9 100.0 February 92.5 95.4 96.4 102.0 69.6 89.1 99.7 March 93.3 96.9 97.0 106.0 68.0 89.0 100.0 April 94.5 97.6 96.6 108.0 69.1 90.8 101.2 May 93.9 97.3 96.8 106.8 69.5 89.9 100.5 June 94.2 97.4 96.7 107.2 69.3 90.5 101.9 July 91.1 98.4 97.2 108.7 71.6 82.4 93.8 August 91.7 99.4 97.5 110.1 73.9 82.5 95.8 September 91.4 99.0 96.6 110.1 73.1 82.4 94.8 October 90.5 97.6 96.9 107.5 69.7 82.1 94.1 November 88.8 95.4 95.2 104.0 67.0 80.9 92.4 December 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • $40,000 - $49,999 98.6 98.8 98.9 99.1 96.6 96.8 96.1 96.1 $50,000 - $59,999 99.1 99.4 99.1 99.4 99.3 100.0 97.0 97.9 $60,000 - $74,999 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.2 99.1 99.5 97.2 98.2 $75,000 + 99.0 99.3 99.0 99.3 97.9 99.2 98.6 98.6 JULY 95 TOTAL 94.0 95.3 95.2 96.3 86.9 89.2 86.2 88.2 UNDER $5,000 76.6 81.2 80.5 84.0 69.1 75.4 75.2 78.5 $5,000 - $7,499 83.0 86.1 84.5 87.8 80.5 82.8 71.2 73.8 $7,500 - $9,999 87.3 89.4 89.2 91.0 81.9 85.5 74.2 77.2 $10,000 - $12,499 89.0 92.0 90.6 93.3 81.3 86.2 84.9 87.8 $12,500 - $14,999 92.3 94.2 93.3 94.9 88.4 91.8 85.4 87.0 $15,000 - $19,999 93.0 94.8 94.0 95.6 88.5 91.3 84.0 86.8 $20,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • 0.31 0.73 10.44 16.70 1.47 5.94 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.4 3.3 2.9 7.3 4.9 3.5 3.7 11.0 18.6 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 23.8 27.1 32.5 22.2 20.2 11.9 7.2 7.9 7.1 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 77.7 80.7 97.6 220.5 67.5 47.7 45.6 54.8 56.8 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 770.3 155.8 72.6 69.1 49.6 497.7 762.0 80.3 337.1 % Trunk Grps. Exceeding 3 Month Blocking 1.01% 2.86% 0.89% 6.78% 1.19% 0.65% 2.05% 4.19% 2.10% Objectives During Calendar Year 9 - 16 Table 9.2(b): Company Comparision -- Switch Downtime & Trunk Blocking -- 1996 Company AmeritechBell AtlanticBellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Sprint Total Access Lines in Thousands 19,553 20,767 21,822 16,541 20,466
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 70.8 96.9 April 123.1 117.2 146.6 70.0 96.8 May 123.8 117.9 147.8 69.8 97.4 June 124.1 117.6 147.2 69.8 97.4 July 124.4 117.8 147.8 69.6 97.0 August 124.6 117.7 147.6 69.6 97.0 September 125.0 117.8 147.9 69.6 96.9 October 125.6 116.9 146.2 69.6 96.7 November 125.9 117.2 146.8 69.6 96.8 December 126.1 116.9 146.0 70.0 96.6 1990January 127.4 117.6 148.4 69.1 95.2 February 128.0 117.9 149.0 69.0 95.1 March 128.4 118.2 149.7 69.0 95.0 April 128.9 118.4 150.0 69.0 95.1 May 129.2 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.2 June 129.9 118.0 149.2 69.0 95.3 July 130.4 115.5 145.4 67.4 95.4 August 130.6 117.7 149.7 67.4 95.3 September 132.7 117.9 150.1 67.4 95.2 October 133.5 118.6 151.4 67.4 94.8 November 133.8 118.6 151.4 67.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 87.9 87.6 88.2 89.0 91.6 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1 All Households 85.9 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 87.9 87.6 88.2 89.0 91.6 88.0 91.4 91.4 93.0 $20,000 - $29,999 94.8 92.6 93.3 94.6 95.5 95.5 94.8 96.2 97.2 $30,000 - $39,999 96.8 98.3 96.6 96.5 97.3 97.6 97.7 99.3 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.1 97.7 98.1 98.9 99.0 98.1 98.8 99.7 98.5 All Households 89.9 88.9 89.1 91.2 92.8 91.7 92.6 93.2 94.1 Georgia $9,999 or less 69.1 75.0 73.3 70.0 81.9 79.5 80.3 76.5 77.7 $10,000 - $19,999 85.7 86.4 88.3 81.8 88.7 88.5 88.2 90.1 92.0 $20,000 - $29,999 91.5 95.7 92.4 95.8 94.2 94.2 92.6 97.1 93.9 $30,000 - $39,999 98.7 100.0 97.2 97.8 98.9 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.1 $40,000 or more 97.8 99.8 99.1 98.1 99.3 98.8 98.7 98.5 99.1 All Households 85.9 89.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 214.2 1,107.5 475.3 219.1 412.3 1,106.7 0.808 IL Indiana 750.5 1.84 748.6 194.5 554.1 275.0 99.1 179.8 553.9 0.206 IN Iowa 245.5 6.23 239.3 48.7 190.6 81.5 34.5 72.7 188.7 1.838 IA Kansas 298.7 298.7 52.9 245.8 102.0 41.8 102.0 245.8 KS Kentucky 464.9 6.85 458.0 106.1 352.0 183.6 66.9 96.8 347.3 4.693KY Louisiana 432.2 11.63 420.6 69.7 350.9 193.3 69.1 83.9 346.3 4.589LA Maine 166.7 2.74 164.0 28.4 135.6 56.2 31.9 47.5 135.6 ME Maryland 679.8 12.50 667.3 102.8 564.5 273.8 87.2 202.4 563.5 0.983MD Massachusetts 922.8 17.36 905.4 90.6 814.8 382.6 154.2 278.1 814.8 MA Michigan 1,191.7 3.16 1,188.6 302.0 886.6 443.3 142.7 300.2 886.3 0.301MI Minnesota 530.9 13.21 517.7 100.3 417.4 167.0 69.3 177.4 413.7 3.707MN Mississippi 231.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 7,184.7 75.4CA Colorado 5,099.4 660.4 4,439.0 3,241.6 1,197.4 685.2 180.9 321.2 1,187.3 10.2CO Connecticut 3,442.9 15.8 3,427.1 2,533.5 893.6 370.7 267.1 250.2 887.9 5.7CT Delaware 724.1 71.0 653.1 449.6 203.5 105.3 27.3 70.5 203.1 0.4DE District of Columbia 1,250.7 161.9 1,088.8 632.2 456.6 101.7 102.5 249.0 453.3 3.4DC Florida 16,940.6 1,658.3 15,282.3 11,312.1 3,970.2 2,491.3 539.5 906.7 3,937.5 32.7FL Georgia 8,069.1 1,247.2 6,821.8 4,846.4 1,975.4 1,110.7 273.7 560.2 1,944.6 30.8GA Hawaii 1,383.8 102.2 1,281.6 988.9 292.7 165.4 46.8 76.1 288.3 4.4HI Idaho 1,118.5 123.6 994.9 676.6 318.3 167.8 65.9 83.4 317.1 1.2ID Illinois 9,668.9 1,083.1 8,585.9 6,475.4 2,110.5 1,062.1 807.8 226.0 2,095.8 14.7IL Indiana 5,123.4 319.1 4,804.3 3,681.5 1,122.8 668.8 261.7 182.0 1,112.5 10.3IN Iowa 1,611.4 138.0 1,473.4 987.5 486.0 218.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • Companies Exchange Companies Industry Companies Study Loops Percent Loops Percent Loops Percent Loops Percent of State Areas of Total of Total of Total Industry Alabama 28 2,302,066 90.7% 0 0.0% 235,651 9.3% 2,537,717 90.7% AL Alaska 25 0 0.0 0 0.0 456,011 100.0 456,011 0.0 AK Arizona 16 2,940,610 93.7 0 0.0 198,159 6.3 3,138,769 93.7 AZ Arkansas 29 1,069,214 69.1 0 0.0 478,337 30.9 1,547,551 69.1 AR California 2223,420,709 98.5 0 0.0 357,280 1.5 23,777,989 98.5 CA Colorado 28 2,872,354 95.6 0 0.0 132,523 4.4 3,004,877 95.6 CO Connecticut 2 2,527,459 99.0 0 0.0 25,155 1.0 2,552,614 99.0 CT Delaware 1 598,874 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 598,874 100.0 DE District of Columbia 1 924,593 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 143.4 64.5 14.7 63.6 142.8 0.6 HI Idaho 198.4 4.8 193.6 25.8 167.8 71.5 25.0 66.0 162.5 5.3 ID Illinois 1,268.1 1.3 1,266.8 237.2 1,029.5 392.4 120.0 489.4 1,001.8 27.7 IL Indiana 691.5 3.5 688.1 144.2 543.9 258.6 53.8 220.5 532.9 10.9 IN Iowa 324.7 4.9 319.8 75.5 244.3 75.7 45.4 113.9 235.0 9.3 IA Kansas 257.1 257.1 24.7 232.4 69.1 31.5 125.2 225.8 6.7 KS Kentucky 275.7 4.8 270.8 25.9 244.9 103.4 37.9 95.4 236.7 8.2 KY Louisiana 455.8 9.6 446.2 51.5 394.7 173.6 49.4 156.2 379.2 15.5 LA Maine 148.1 2.5 145.5 13.9 131.6 54.1 17.6 59.9 131.6 ME Maryland 755.2 11.5 743.7 85.9 657.8 262.4 75.0 320.4 657.8 MD Massachusetts 879.7 13.2 866.5 54.3 812.2 325.2 78.7 408.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 22.2 27.5 8.7 58.4 MT NEBRASKA 201.3 (0.31) 201.6 70.4 131.2 49.3 58.3 23.6 131.2 NE NEVADA 139.7 (0.48) 140.1 9.3 130.8 50.6 62.9 17.4 130.8 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 169.2 2.31 166.9 5.5 161.4 57.0 91.9 12.6 161.4 NH NEW JERSEY 1,008.7 1.56 1,007.1 145.3 861.9 403.9 321.6 135.2 860.7 1.174 NJ NEW MEXICO 186.5 3.04 183.4 33.9 149.5 63.6 69.1 16.9 149.5 NM NEW YORK 2,443.8 11.13 2,432.7 332.3 2,100.4 826.6 1,012.9 260.9 2,100.4 NY NORTH CAROLINA 856.1 0.89 855.2 298.0 557.2 295.1 182.0 79.1 556.1 1.076 NC NORTH DAKOTA 64.5 (1.45) 66.0 19.6 46.4 18.7 19.8 7.8 46.4 ND OHIO 1,127.2 (1.39) 1,128.6 350.5 778.1 378.9 287.3 111.1 777.4 0.705 OH OKLAHOMA 276.2 (3.44) 279.7 47.2 232.5 114.1 83.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 66.9 SD TENNESSEE 25 2,465,023 80.2 228,404 7.4 378,385 12.3 3,071,812 87.7 TN TEXAS 57 8,376,840 78.4 1,681,396 15.7 620,202 5.8 10,678,438 94.2 TX UTAH 13 941,891 95.7 0 0.0 42,703 4.3 984,594 95.7 UT VERMONT 10 307,533 84.1 0 0.0 57,939 15.9 365,472 84.1 VT VIRGINIA 21 2,839,412 75.4 825,402 21.9 100,559 2.7 3,765,373 97.3 VA WASHINGTON 22 2,258,674 69.1 718,268 22.0 293,257 9.0 3,270,199 91.0 WA WEST VIRGINIA 10 703,559 83.1 0 0.0 142,781 16.9 846,340 83.1 WV WISCONSIN 89 2,047,863 67.0 442,215 14.5 567,691 18.6 3,057,769 81.4 WI WYOMING 10 226,095 82.4 0 0.0 48,214 17.6 274,309 82.4 WY UNITED STATES 1,431120,909,662 76.8 25,533,402 16.2 10,985,271 7.0 157,428,335 93.0 US N. MARIANA ISL. 1 0 0.0 0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 99.8 MD MASSACHUSETTS 3 4,460,078 99.9 0 0.0 3,871 0.1 4,463,949 99.9 MA MICHIGAN 39 5,312,786 84.9 728,244 11.6 216,969 3.5 6,257,999 96.5 MI MINNESOTA 88 2,133,116 74.1 0 0.0 744,760 25.9 2,877,876 74.1 MN MISSISSIPPI 19 1,236,080 93.6 0 0.0 85,166 6.4 1,321,246 93.6 MS MISSOURI 44 2,499,418 75.2 652,214 19.6 172,384 5.2 3,324,016 94.8 MO MONTANA 18 350,983 69.1 0 0.0 157,077 30.9 508,060 69.1 MT NEBRASKA 41 522,260 52.5 337,118 33.9 136,056 13.7 995,434 86.3 NE NEVADA 14 330,523 27.4 823,420 68.2 52,939 4.4 1,206,882 95.6 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 12 767,486 93.8 0 0.0 50,636 6.2 818,122 93.8 NH NEW JERSEY 3 5,992,697 96.6 198,847 3.2 9,406 0.2 6,200,950 99.8 NJ NEW MEXICO 15 767,814 85.2 45,535 5.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • NH NEW JERSEY 10,588.0 571.7 10,016.3 6,980.4 3,035.8 1,464.8 573.9 978.5 3,017.2 18.663 NJ NEW MEXICO 2,035.2 79.6 1,955.5 1,399.4 556.2 345.3 113.4 94.0 552.6 3.555 NM NEW YORK 23,548.8 1,111.2 22,437.6 15,860.0 6,577.6 2,568.6 2,151.8 1,806.6 6,526.9 50.665 NY NORTH CAROLINA 8,982.2 427.4 8,554.8 6,397.2 2,157.7 1,390.2 381.2 354.6 2,126.0 31.630 NC NORTH DAKOTA 491.6 9.6 482.0 318.7 163.3 69.1 41.8 51.9 162.7 0.623 ND OHIO 11,706.7 706.9 10,999.9 8,311.5 2,688.3 1,459.6 710.0 477.9 2,647.5 40.831 OH OKLAHOMA 3,352.6 118.0 3,234.6 2,363.5 871.2 514.5 143.1 208.5 866.2 5.015 OK OREGON 3,674.3 148.0 3,526.3 2,537.2 989.0 576.3 207.3 200.3 983.9 5.100 OR PENNSYLVANIA 13,296.8 615.7 12,201.6 8,881.8 3,319.8 1,841.7 477.4 982.1 3,301.1 18.677 PA RHODE ISLAND 1,028.5 55.0 973.4 684.8 288.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • Connecticut 4,688.6 114.5 4,574.1 3,298.6 1,275.5 554.2 440.4 279.9 1,274.5 1.0CT Delaware 946.1 42.5 903.6 626.7 276.9 149.9 39.9 85.8 275.6 1.2DE District of Columbia 1,876.5 162.4 1,714.1 1,094.1 620.1 148.7 148.8 314.7 612.3 7.8DC Florida 21,188.1 872.6 20,315.5 15,156.0 5,159.5 3,427.3 729.9 921.0 5,078.1 81.4 FL Georgia 10,524.1 578.2 9,945.9 7,349.3 2,596.6 1,624.3 394.8 512.9 2,532.0 64.6GA Hawaii 1,858.1 69.1 1,789.1 1,371.8 417.3 237.3 69.6 104.4 411.3 6.0 HI Idaho 1,428.5 42.1 1,386.4 945.1 441.3 235.3 101.7 102.0 439.1 2.2 ID Illinois 12,601.8 551.4 12,050.4 9,167.2 2,883.2 1,504.1 876.0 420.5 2,800.6 42.0 IL Indiana 6,348.3 359.6 5,988.8 4,500.0 1,488.8 878.5 289.4 299.8 1,467.6 21.2 IN Iowa 2,696.0 99.5 2,596.5 1,830.0 766.5 364.1 164.7 232.6 761.5 5.0 IA Kansas 2,572.9 97.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000983.doc
  • proceedings associated with these petitions the following file numbers: 1) Petition for Reinstatement of Southern California Pay Phone Company, File No. E-99-29; Petition for Reinstatement of Total, File No. E-99-30. See C.F. Communications Corp., et al., v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., et al., 12 FCC Rcd 2134 (1997) (Denial Order). See 47 U.S.C. �� 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. C.F. Communications Corporation v. FCC, No. 97-1202, slip. op. (D.C. Cir. 1997). The Commission subsequently took voluntary remand of several other cases raising the same issues that were the subject of appeals of a separate order and consolidated the cases from both proceedings for purposes of the remand proceeding. See C.F. Communications Corporation v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/fcc00206.doc
  • v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 556, 594, 602, �� 88, 108 (1998); Infonxx, Inc. v. New York Tel. Co., FCC 97-359, File No. E-96-26, 1997 WL 621592, � 16 (1997); Beehive Tel., Inc. v. Bell Operating Companies, 10 FCC Rcd 10562, 10566, �� 23-24 (1995), affirmed after voluntary remand, 12 FCC Rcd 17930 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.1, et seq. In the Access Charge Reform Docket, we acknowledged that CLEC access rates may ``be higher due to the CLECs' high start-up costs for building new networks, their small geographical service areas, and the limited number of subscribers over which CLECs can distribute costs.'' Access Charge Reform, Fifth Report and Order and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • IA IOWA CITY 12 45 922.3 439.0 35414 1080 31000 929 0.0 0.0 100.0 IA IOWA CITY 20 25 50.0 123.0 11519 390 11169 371 1.4 0.7 100.0 IA MASON CITY 3 42 1000.0 472.0 42310 734 32426 513 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA MASON CITY 24 18 50.0 436.0 19783 275 19674 275 0.5 0.1 100.0 IA OTTUMWA 15 14 69.1 363.0 19978 338 19746 333 1.3 0.5 100.0 IA RED OAK 36 35 63.1 475.0 20212 748 19928 745 1.9 2.7 100.0 IA SIOUX CITY 4 41 1000.0 585.0 49038 632 38681 499 0.0 0.0 99.8 IA SIOUX CITY 9 30 766.6 616.0 44129 531 38211 463 0.0 0.0 99.4 IA SIOUX CITY 14 39 50.0 351.0 19053 257 19017
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1999/fcc99146.pdf
  • Order on Reconsideration and Fourth Report and Order, FCC 93-463, Docket No. 90-571, 9 FCC Rcd 1637 (rel. Sept. 29, 1993) (clarifying that TRS Fund contributions may be treated as exogenous costs under price cap regulation). To this end, we believe that AT&T suggestion concerning price cap reductions would be more appropriately considered in access charge proceedings. See CFR section 69.1. See also LNP Cost Recovery Order, paragraph 109 (suggesting that incumbent LECs would like pass on shared costs of number portability to IXCs 13 favors interexchange carriers ("IXCs") by virtue of the fact that they are able to deduct payments made to the underlying carriers. The end user methodology was opposed by MCI WorldCom, Inc. (MCI WorldCom), which claimed that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp30.wp
  • a reference from one document to another. On the World Wide Web, a user can select a link on one page and "jump" to a second page referenced by that link. Telemessaging/Electronic Publishing Order, at para. 46 n.114, citing Wired Style: Principles of English Usage in the Digital Age (Hale ed., 1996) at 49-50. Id. 260 See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. (Part 69). The Part 69 rules are designed to be consistent with the Commission's jurisdictional separations rules that govern the allocation of incumbent LECs' expenses and investment between the interstate and state jurisdictions. See Part 36 of the Commission's Rules; 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 et seq. 261 MTS and WATS Market Structure, Docket No. 78-72, Memorandum Opinion and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.txt
  • they are not considered to be ``telecommunications carriers.'' Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 12 FCC Rcd 8776, �� 788-90 (1997). Pursuant to section 251(a) of the 1996 Act, all telecommunications carriers must ``interconnect directly or indirectly with the facilities and equipment of other telecommunications carriers.'' Section 251(c)(2) imposes additional interconnection obligations on incumbent LECs. See generally 47 C.F.R. � 69.1 et seq. MTS and WATS Market Structure, 97 FCC 2d 682, 711-22 (1983). Downes, Thomas and Shane Greenstein, ``Do Commercial ISPs Provide Universal Access,'' (Dec. 1998), available at http://skew2.kellogg.nwu.edu/~greenste/research/papers/tprcbook.pdf. POP stands for Point of Presence and refers to the number of local nodes for dial-up access that the ISP has deployed. Although business telephone lines may feature metered usage rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209958-1.pdf
  • YES Volume Control Resets when placed YES YES NO back on-hook? Employs conventional circuitry? ? ? El Figure 1: Comparison of Tested Units Note 1. Sample "C" is 6 dB quieter than nominal at the minimum volume control. PARAMETER SAMPLE "A- SAMPLE `B" SAMPLE `C" Noise at Minimum 41.4 46.7 31.0 < 40 dB SPL (A) Noise at Maximum 64.1 69.1 56.6 (No Spec.) dB SPL (A) Transmit Loudness (TOLR) -45.6 -46.6 -44.1 -48 +8, -5 dB ROLR Loudness at Minimum 42.3 43.5 52.0 +46 f 5 dB ROLR Loudness at Maximum 22.9 25.2 28.5 dB SPL Level at Minimum 95.5 96.9 87.7 dB SPL (1 kHz) SPL Level at Maximum 116.2 115.7 111.5 dB SPL (1 kHz) Volume Control Range
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210007-2.pdf
  • Spec.) dB SPL (A) Transmit Loudness (TOLR) -48 +8, -5 dB ROLR Loudness at Minimum +46+5dB ROLR Loudness at Maximum dB SPL Level at Minimum dB SPL (1 kHz) SPL Level at Maximum dB SPL (1 kHz) Volume Control Range Calculated using ROLR Proposed > 20 dB Volume Control Range Calculated using SPL Proposed > 20 dB 41.4 46.7 64.1 69.1 -45.6 -46.6 42.3 43.5 22.9 25.2 95.5 96.9 116.2 115.7 19.4 18.3 20.7 18.8 Figure2: Summary of Measurements 31 .o 56.6 -44.1 52.0 28.5 87.7 111.5 23.5 23.9 - 2.5 - Note: Since ROLR and TOLR are calculated using losses the more neaative the ROLR or TOLR the louder the telephone. - 26 - SAMPLE "A" Volume Control Range -1;/1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22497, 22555 (1998); Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, Order on Reconsideration, FCC 01-78 (rel. Mar. 7, 2001). See Appendix A for a list of the parties. 47 U.S.C. � 201(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 et seq. Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references are to the 2000 edition. We refer to prior C.F.R. editions in instances where the prior rules were different than the current rules. C.F. Communications Corp., et al. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order on Remand, 15 FCC Rcd 8759 (2000) (``Liability Order''); recon. denied, 15
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01185.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01185.html
  • allocated to the interstate jurisdiction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 36.1 - 36.741. After the total amount of regulated, interstate cost is identified, the access charge and price cap rules translate these interstate costs into charges for the specific interstate access services and rate elements. Part 69 specifies in detail the rate structure for recovering these costs. See 47 C.F.R. �� 69.1 - 69.731. Finally, Part 61 requires ILECs to publish their rates in tariffs, and the rules restrict how and when incumbents may change their rates. See 47 C.F.R. �� 61.1 - 61.193. Additionally, the Commission regulates the rate levels ILECs may charge for their access services, requiring them to comply with either the rate-of-return or the price-cap regulations. Compare 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1890A1.html
  • al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098, 1109 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3671, 5. See also Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2225, 2226 (EB 2002), at 3 (``Second Waiver Order''). 5 Second Waiver Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 2226, 3. 6
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-259A1.html
  • the Secretary of the Commission shall cause to have this Order published in the Federal Register. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint. 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 2 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 3 See C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also C.F. Communications Corp. v. FCC, No. 97- 1202, slip. op (D.C. Cir. 1997); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc. et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 7334, 7335-36 (1993); C.F. Communications Corp. v. Century Telephone of Wisconsin, Inc.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
  • complaints for administrative convenience. See Letter from Radhika V. Karmarkar, Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to all counsel, File Nos. EB-02-MD- 018 - 030 (rel. May 1, 2002) (``May 1, 2002 Letter Ruling'') at 5. 2 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c). Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996) (the ``Act''). 3 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. (1987 - 1997). Unless otherwise indicated, all C.F.R. references to Part 69 of the Commission's rules refer to the rules in effect prior to April 15, 1997. 4 ``Citizens'' refers collectively to Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company, Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company of California,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2000A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1450A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2865A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. f/k/a South Central Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-023 (filed January 14, 2004). Because the Commission order assessing liability in this case was on appeal to the D.C. Circuit at the time this motion was filed, we deferred ruling
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2866A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a TDS Telcom, Communications Corporation of Indiana d/b/a TDS Telcom, and Home Telephone Company of Pittsboro, Inc., Supplement to Formal complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-025 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Indiana Telcom Corporation v. Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., TDS Telecommunications Corporation, Tipton Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3167A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed with six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3476A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3477A1.html
  • and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2. Communications Vending corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Utilities Company and Citizens Telecommunications Company d/b/a Citizens Telcom, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-029 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Payphone Systems v. Citizens Communications Company f/k/a Citizens Telcom, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-018 (filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-4022A1.html
  • Order, 16 FCC Rcd 3669 (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8. A final nonappealable order has been entered in that proceeding. See Verizon Telephone Companies, et al. v. FCC, 269 F.3d 1098 (D.C. Cir. 2001). 5 See Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1972A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3 Payphone Systems v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-030 (filed April 11, 2005). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1972A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1974A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-022 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Indiana and Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Notice of Settlement
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1975A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB- 02-MD-028 (filed April 26, 2002). 3 NSC Communications Public Services Corporation v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal Complaint With Prejudice, FCC, File No. EB-02-MD-028 (filed May 17, 2005). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1975A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1976A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD- 021 (filed Apr. 26, 2002). 3 Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. ALLTEL Corporation, Western Reserve Telephone Company-ALLTEL, ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and ALLTEL Indiana, Inc., Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss Formal
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3072A1.html
  • 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that the above-captioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety and the proceedings ARE TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rosemary McEnery, Deputy Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 201(b) and 203(c); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. (1996); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et. seq. 2 Communications Vending Corporation of Arizona, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation f/k/a US West Communications, Inc., Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-019 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); IMR Capital Corporation v. Verizon New England, Inc. f/k/a New England Telephone Company, Supplement to Formal Complaint, File No. EB-02-MD-020 (filed Apr. 26, 2002); Indiana Telcom Corporation, Inc. v. Verizon North, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-674A1.html
  • (CCB 1999) (``First Waiver Order''). 2 Ordinarily, section 1.718 requires that a formal complaint must be filed within six months of the carrier's response to the informal complaint if the formal complaint is to relate back for statute of limitations purposes to the filing of the informal complaint. See 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b) and 202(a); 47 C.F.R. 69.1 et seq. 4 See First Waiver Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 3672, 8; Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of End User Common Line Charges, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2115 (EB 2002) (``Second Waiver Order''); Informal Complaints Filed By Independent Payphone Service Providers Against Various Local Exchange Carriers Seeking Refunds of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • and any such charge, practice, classification or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful." Complaint at 4, P: 4; Joint Statement, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed June 6, 2007) ("Joint Statement") at 1, P: 2. Joint Statement at 1-2, P: 4. Joint Statement at 2, P: 5. Joint Statement at 1-2, P: 4. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.1-69.2. Complaint at 6, P: 8; Answer of Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Company, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed May 29, 2007) ("Answer") at 12, P: 8. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.601-69.612. Complaint at 6-7, P: 9; Answer at 12, P: 9; see 47 C.F.R. S: 69.3(d). Complaint at 6-7, P: 9; Answer at 12, P: 9; see 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.604,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-5A1.html
  • the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19975, 19990, P: 32 (2003); see also Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc. v. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., 423 F.3d 1056, 1067-70 (9th Cir. 2005) (and Commission orders cited therein), aff'd, Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., 550 U.S. 45 (2007). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. S: 203; 47 C.F.R. S:S: 69.1 - 69.731; see n.32, supra. See generally 2001 CLEC Access Charge Reform Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 9957 (stating that "our tariff rules were historically intended to protect purchasers of service from monopoly providers, not to protect sellers from monopsony purchasing power"); In the Matter of Communique Telecommunications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 13635, 13649, P: 26
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00206.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00206.txt
  • v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 556, 594, 602, �� 88, 108 (1998); Infonxx, Inc. v. New York Tel. Co., FCC 97-359, File No. E-96-26, 1997 WL 621592, � 16 (1997); Beehive Tel., Inc. v. Bell Operating Companies, 10 FCC Rcd 10562, 10566, �� 23-24 (1995), affirmed after voluntary remand, 12 FCC Rcd 17930 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 69.1, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.1, et seq. In the Access Charge Reform Docket, we acknowledged that CLEC access rates may ``be higher due to the CLECs' high start-up costs for building new networks, their small geographical service areas, and the limited number of subscribers over which CLECs can distribute costs.'' Access Charge Reform, Fifth Report and Order and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2679A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2679A1.pdf
  • at 5. Petition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c); see also Southeast Arkansas Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 61 FCC 2d 72 (1976) (reconsideration denied where evidence could have been discovered with due diligence). Petition at 6. Id. at 10. Mount Pisgah Application, Exhibit response to Section II, Question 2(a). Petition at 10. North Carolina General Statutes, � 1-69.1. Id., � 55-1-40(9)a.3. Id., � 39-24. Petition at 10. Cherokee Home Demonstration Club v. Oxendine, 100 N.C. App. 622, 397 S.E.2d 643 (1990). See National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 June 19, 2007 DA 07-2679 In Reply Refer to: 1800B3-BSH Released: June 19, 2007 ��`��gd, I
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-bc/can-dtv.pdf
  • 308 47 36LINDEN NJ 404243 740049 4570 460148.9 460 50 51MONTCLAIR NJ 405153 741203 5000 243179.2 243 58 18NEW BRUNSWICK NJ 403717 743015 1320 223 50 223 13 61NEWARK NJ 404243 740049 60.3 500198.7 500 68 53NEWARK NJ 404454 735910 2630 439 55.9 439 63 8NEWTON NJ 410036 743539 2190 223 3.2 223 41 40PATERSON NJ 404454 735910 2340 421 69.1 421 9 38SECAUCUS NJ 404243 740049 61.7 500136.4 500 66 29WEST MILFORD NJ 410714 741203 24 217 50 217 10 26ALBANY NY 423815 735954 316 305 1000 305 13 15ALBANY NY 424708 733744 178 357505.7 357 23 4ALBANY NY 423701 740046 3020 366 1 366 55 50AMSTERDAM NY 425905 741049 5000 223136.8 223 62 0ARCADE NY 422852 783403 1290 164
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1,018 1,141 1,357 1,306 1,307 1,209 18.8 Italy n.a. n.a. 1,545 1,772 1,700 2,234 2,635 2,740 4,965 15,613 20,067 798.3 Jamaica n.a. n.a. 587 620 639 771 668 802 1,041 969 1,204 56.2 Japan n.a. n.a. 4,888 5,629 6,582 7,041 8,681 11,133 10,764 15,125 12,387 75.9 Korea, Republic of n.a. n.a. 1,143 1,492 2,246 2,299 2,678 2,858 2,807 3,037 3,887 69.1 Mexico n.a. n.a. 23,270 27,812 37,030 40,350 52,280 64,529 71,216 83,465 84,320 109.0 Morocco n.a. n.a. 91 89 113 115 112 114 114 113 142 23.5 Netherlands n.a. n.a. 1,224 1,073 1,179 2,087 1,831 3,401 3,497 3,012 5,247 151.4 Nigeria n.a. n.a. 232 208 232 294 364 365 303 333 454 54.4 Pakistan n.a. n.a. 268 329 269 300 305
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files07/CREPOR07.PDF
  • 0.0 11.0 89.0 $61,331 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 171,636,345 0.1 30.3 2.7 14.3 52.7 Iraq $24,796,439 0.0 17.5 0.9 6.4 75.2 $530,878 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $10,028 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 79,920,941 0.0 26.5 3.7 20.2 49.6 Israel $46,713,582 0.0 17.6 0.8 16.6 65.0 $3,689,923 0.0 36.4 0.0 11.7 51.9 $816,709 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 875,683,610 0.0 13.5 1.2 16.2 69.1 Jordan $7,291,668 0.0 38.6 1.2 15.7 44.5 $316,528 0.0 12.5 0.0 25.6 61.8 $1,183,377 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 85,532,194 0.0 22.0 2.6 29.8 45.6 Kuwait $13,698,850 0.1 22.8 2.0 17.2 57.9 $315,445 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 89.2 $19,653 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 124,067,925 0.2 22.1 3.2 27.2 47.3 Lebanon $34,010,536 0.0 13.5 20.3 42.7 23.4 $328,507 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
  • 93.9 Mar-00 30 37 18 14 34.262.390.6 Mar-01 30 35 16 14 40.266.890.9 Milwaukee - Racine Mar-96 28 34 22 16 27.5 n/a 68.5 Nov-97 29 35 17 16 30.4n/a 81.1 Nov-98 31 35 16 16 29.7 n/a 80.2 Mar-00 31 35 16 17 23.446.276.1 Mar-01 31 35 15 17 27.651.286.5 San Antonio TX Mar-96 34 33 16 13 23.7n/a 69.1 Nov-97 34 33 16 14 28.8n/a 81.5 Nov-98 34 34 17 12 32.6 n/a 85.1 Mar-00 32 38 20 12 30.750.682.4 Mar-01 32 39 18 11 32.652.083.3 Middlesex-Somerset-Union NJ Mar-96n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nov-97n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Nov-98n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mar-00n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mar-01 33 5
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/order_da_91_143.pdf
  • NIl. I I 3030 lOp SYS 36/69 I I I I I NIl. I I 3031 I.op SYS 36/69 I I I I I NIl. I I 3040 ITransmiss ion 36/69 I I I I I NIl. 1 I 3041 I'Transmission 36/691 I I II NIl. I I 3050 IIOT 36/69 I I I I I I I 3051 1,IOT 36/69.1 I I I I I I 3060 IC&WF 36/69 I I I I I NIl. I I 3061 I'C&~F 36/69 I I I I I NIl. I I 3070 IPHFTU 36/69 I I I I I I I 3071 I'PHFTU 36/69 I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I 3080 ITot Acc Depr
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/depreciation/documents/fcc00306.pdf
  • are percentages of gross book cost. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPENDIX Schedule of Annual Percentages of Depreciation for PAGE 2 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC. - Idaho Effective January 1, 2000 Average Future Remaining Remaining Net Accumulated Life Rate Category Description Life Salvage Depreciation Rate ----------------------------------- -------------- ---------- ------------------ ----------------- (years) (%) (%) (%) A B C D=(100%-B-C)/A 2112 MOTOR VEHICLES 3.2 10 69.1 6.5 2115 GARAGE WORK EQ 6.0 0 46.1 9.0 2116 OTHER WORK EQ 5.6 0 43.5 10.1 2121 BUILDINGS 21.0 0 32.9 3.2 2122 FURNITURE 5.6 0 54.4 8.1 2123.1 OFFICE SUPPORT EQ 2.8 0 34.3 23.5 2123.2 COMPANY COMMUN EQ 5.6 0 53.1 8.4 2124 GEN PURPOSE COMPUTERS 2.9 0 86.1 4.8 2212 DIGITAL ELECTRONIC SW 6.8 0 46.4