FCC Web Documents citing 73.154
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-129A1.txt
- the Stations' employment unit has five or more full time employees. Furthermore, Litton's April 6, 2006, measurements fail to evidence unauthorized WVKO(AM) operation. First, Litton neglects to specify the measurements obtained from his April 6, 2006, field strength test of WVKO(AM)'s radiated power. Further, Litton appears to have disregarded the field strength measurement guidelines set out in Sections 73.151 and 73.154 of the Rules. These rules require that measurements be taken at certain monitoring point locations. Litton also has failed to submit information and make representations necessary to establish the reliability of the meter used for these measurements. Accordingly, Litton's unsupported allegation regarding nighttime operations do not raise a substantial and material question of fact warranting further inquiry. Moreover, in its
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-237A1.txt
- WWWP-LP, Wauchula, Florida, seeking reconsideration of the dismissal of its referenced license application (the ``Application''). For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Petition. Background. WEBC's construction permit, as modified, contained the following condition: ``Both prior to construction of the tower and subsequent to the installation of all appurtenances thereon, a partial proof of performance as defined by Section 73.154 of the Commission's Rules, shall be conducted to establish that the AM array [of Station WAUC(AM)] has not been adversely affected and . . . the results submitted to the Commission.'' WEBC filed the Application on December 12, 2003, without satisfying the condition requiring a partial proof of performance. On June 28, 2004, the Commission sent WEBC a letter requiring
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1649A1.txt
- that, ``should any adverse impact be exposed, then it shall be the responsibility of each of the Stations to find a suitable solution to this problem. Following the grant of the construction permit applications, the Stations constructed their DTV facilities. A consulting engineer jointly-selected by Global and the Stations performed the required before and after measurements as required by Section 73.154 of the Commission's Rules. The Stations maintain that the measurements show that installation of their DTV facilities ``has not adversely affected the directional antenna system of WNWR.'' Global disagrees, arguing that the measurements actually show that, in the case of every radial measured, the field at each such azimuth increased in intensity following the construction of the Stations' new tower.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211634A1.txt
- copy of this Notice, including both the Initial and Final Regulatory Flexibility Analyses, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. 57. Additional Information. For additional information on this proceeding, please contact Son Nguyen, Edward De La Hunt, or Ann Gallagher, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau at (202) 418-2700. The released text of 47 C.F.R. § 73.154(b) is amended by revising the first sentence of paragraph (b) to read as follows: § 73.154 AM directional antenna partial proof of performance measurements. ***** (b) The measurements are to be made within 3 to 15 kilometers from the center of the antenna array. *** ***** The released text of 47 C.F.R. § 73.151(a)(3) is amended to read as follows:
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.txt
- strength at each monitoring point. Subsequent to these modifications or changes the above procedure must be repeated. (d)(3) If monitoring point field strengths or antenna monitor parameters exceed allowable limits following the replacement or modification of that portion of the sampling system above the base of the towers, a partial proof of performance shall be executed in accordance with Sec. 73.154 . The partial proof of performance shall be accompanied by common point impedance measurements made in accordance with Sec. 73.54. ***** Section 73.69 is amended by revising subsections (a), (d)(2) and (d)(4) to read as follows: § 73.69 Antenna monitors. (a) Each station using a directional antenna must have in operation at the transmitter site an FCC authorized antenna monitor.
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.txt
- on a station license issued prior to January 1, 1986. The results of the measurements are to be entered into the station log pursuant to the provisions of § 73.1820. (b) If the AM license was granted on the basis of field strength measurements performed pursuant to § 73.151(a), partial proof of performance measurements using the procedures described in § 73.154 must be made whenever the licensee has reason to believe that the radiated field may be exceeding the limits for which the station was most recently authorized to operate. ***** Amend § 73.68 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows, by adding a new paragraph (b), and by redesignating the remaining paragraphs. § 73.68 Sampling systems for antenna monitors.
- http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/amfmrule.html
- [127]TEXT [128]PDF 73.127 Use of multiplex transmission. [129]TEXT [130]PDF 73.128 AM stereophonic broadcasting. [131]TEXT [132]PDF 73.132 Territorial exclusivity. [133]TEXT [134]PDF 73.150 Directional antenna systems. [135]TEXT [136]PDF 73.151 Field strength measurements to establish performance of directional antennas. [137]TEXT [138]PDF 73.152 Modification of directional antenna data. [139]TEXT [140]PDF 73.153 Field strength measurements in support of applications or evidence at hearings. [141]TEXT [142]PDF 73.154 AM directional antenna partial proof of performance measurements. [143]TEXT [144]PDF 73.157 Antenna testing during daytime. [145]TEXT [146]PDF 73.158 Directional antenna monitoring points. [147]TEXT [148]PDF 73.160 Vertical plane radiation characteristics, f(). [149]TEXT [150]PDF 73.182 Engineering standards of allocation. [151]TEXT [152]PDF 73.183 Groundwave signals. [153]TEXT [154]PDF 73.184 Groundwave field strength graphs. [ [155]Groundwave Field Strength Graphs ] [156]TEXT [157]PDF 73.185 Computation of
- http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.pdf
- AM station may determine operating power by the indirect method (see ( 73.51) and request special temporary authority pursuant to ( 73.1635 to operate with parameters at variance in order to maintain monitoring point field strengths within authorized limits. Both prior to the commencement of construction and upon completion of construction, a partial proof of performance (as defined by ( 73.154) shall be conducted to establish that the AM array has not been adversely affected. Prior to or simultaneously with filing of the license application to cover the broadcast station construction, the results of the partial proof of performance shall be filed with the Commission on Form 302-AM. (c) Tower Erections or Modifications Within 0.8 km of an AM Nondirectional Tower.
- http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/ebf/special_cond_code21.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/ebf/special_cond_code21.txt
- AM station shall determine operating power by the indirect method and, if necessary, request temporary authority from the Commission in Washington to operate with parameters at variance in order|to maintain monitoring point values within authorized limits. Upon completion of the installation, commonpoint impedance measurements of the AM array shall be made and a proof of performance, as defined by section 73.154(a) of the Commission's Rules,|shall be conducted to establish that the AM array has not been adversely affected and the results submitted to the Commission along with a power sketch of the installation in an application for station to return the direct method of power determination.||| 12|MW|During installation of the antenna system of this station, AM station shall determine operation power
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99126.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99126.txt
- examined azimuth. Partial proofs of performance are required after the installation of new equipment on an AM tower or where changes in the electrical environment, such as erection of a new tower nearby, could affect the radiation pattern. These proofs are conducted to verify that the array remains properly adjusted. 1. Number of Points Required . Presently, 47 C.F.R. § 73.154 requires that permittees make at least 10 field strength measurements within 3 to 16 kilometers from the array at radial locations used in the last complete proof of performance. If a radial contains a monitoring point, that point must be included in the measurements. . Proposal. We propose to reduce to 8 the required minimum number of points per radial.
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01060.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01060.txt
- strength at each monitoring point. Subsequent to these modifications or changes the above procedure must be repeated. (d)(3) If monitoring point field strengths or antenna monitor parameters exceed allowable limits following the replacement or modification of that portion of the sampling system above the base of the towers, a partial proof of performance shall be executed in accordance with Sec. 73.154 . The partial proof of performance shall be accompanied by common point impedance measurements made in accordance with Sec. 73.54. ***** Section 73.69 is amended by revising subsections (a), (d)(2) and (d)(4) to read as follows: § 73.69 Antenna monitors. (a) Each station using a directional antenna must have in operation at the transmitter site an FCC authorized antenna monitor.
- http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-129A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-129A1.pdf
- the Stations' employment unit has five or more full time employees. Furthermore, Litton's April 6, 2006, measurements fail to evidence unauthorized WVKO(AM) operation. First, Litton neglects to specify the measurements obtained from his April 6, 2006, field strength test of WVKO(AM)'s radiated power. Further, Litton appears to have disregarded the field strength measurement guidelines set out in Sections 73.151 and 73.154 of the Rules. These rules require that measurements be taken at certain monitoring point locations. Litton also has failed to submit information and make representations necessary to establish the reliability of the meter used for these measurements. Accordingly, Litton's unsupported allegation regarding nighttime operations do not raise a substantial and material question of fact warranting further inquiry. Moreover, in its
- http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-237A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-237A1.pdf
- WWWP-LP, Wauchula, Florida, seeking reconsideration of the dismissal of its referenced license application (the ``Application''). For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Petition. Background. WEBC's construction permit, as modified, contained the following condition: ``Both prior to construction of the tower and subsequent to the installation of all appurtenances thereon, a partial proof of performance as defined by Section 73.154 of the Commission's Rules, shall be conducted to establish that the AM array [of Station WAUC(AM)] has not been adversely affected and . . . the results submitted to the Commission.'' WEBC filed the Application on December 12, 2003, without satisfying the condition requiring a partial proof of performance. On June 28, 2004, the Commission sent WEBC a letter requiring
- http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/01-60.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/01-60.pdf
- strength at each monitoring point. Subsequent to these modifications or changes the above procedure must be repeated. (d)(3) If monitoring point field strengths or antenna monitor parameters exceed allowable limits following the replacement or modification of that portion of the sampling system above the base of the towers, a partial proof of performance shall be executed in accordance with Sec. 73.154 . The partial proof of performance shall be accompanied by common point impedance measurements made in accordance with Sec. 73.54. ***** Section 73.69 is amended by revising subsections (a), (d)(2) and (d)(4) to read as follows: § 73.69 Antenna monitors. (a) Each station using a directional antenna must have in operation at the transmitter site an FCC authorized antenna monitor.
- http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.pdf
- AM station may determine operating power by the indirect method (see ( 73.51) and request special temporary authority pursuant to ( 73.1635 to operate with parameters at variance in order to maintain monitoring point field strengths within authorized limits. Both prior to the commencement of construction and upon completion of construction, a partial proof of performance (as defined by ( 73.154) shall be conducted to establish that the AM array has not been adversely affected. Prior to or simultaneously with filing of the license application to cover the broadcast station construction, the results of the partial proof of performance shall be filed with the Commission on Form 302-AM. (c) Tower Erections or Modifications Within 0.8 km of an AM Nondirectional Tower.
- http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/pn870811.pdf
- AMradiationpatternisessentiallyomnidirectional. Theresults ofthefieldstrengthandimpedancemeasurementsshouldbereported to the the AM the be Commission in an application for theAMstationtoreturntothedirect methodofpowerdetermination. Ifconstructionisplannedwithin2milesof a directional AM array the licensee shouldnotifytheAMstationsothat,ifnecessary,theAMstation maydetermineoperatingpowerbytheindirectmethodand request temporary authority from theCommissioninWashington,DCtooperatewithparameters atvarianceinordertomaintainmonitoring point field strengths within authorized limits(SeeSection73.51(e)&(f)).Thecommoncarriershallbe responsibleforthe installation and continued maintenance of detuning apparatusnecessarytopreventadverseaffectsupontheradiationpatternof the AM station. Bothpriortoconstructionofthetowerandsubsequentto the installation of all appurtenances thereon a partial proof of performance,asdefinedbySection 73.154(a) of the Commission's Rules, shall be conducted to establishthattheAMarrayhasnotbeenadversely affected. Prior to or simultaneous with the filing of the FCC 489 notification, the results of the measurements mustbesubmittedtothe Commission. ForfurtherinformationcontactJayO'Connorat(202)653-5560 -FCC-
- http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/amfmrule.html
- [127]TEXT [128]PDF 73.127 Use of multiplex transmission. [129]TEXT [130]PDF 73.128 AM stereophonic broadcasting. [131]TEXT [132]PDF 73.132 Territorial exclusivity. [133]TEXT [134]PDF 73.150 Directional antenna systems. [135]TEXT [136]PDF 73.151 Field strength measurements to establish performance of directional antennas. [137]TEXT [138]PDF 73.152 Modification of directional antenna data. [139]TEXT [140]PDF 73.153 Field strength measurements in support of applications or evidence at hearings. [141]TEXT [142]PDF 73.154 AM directional antenna partial proof of performance measurements. [143]TEXT [144]PDF 73.157 Antenna testing during daytime. [145]TEXT [146]PDF 73.158 Directional antenna monitoring points. [147]TEXT [148]PDF 73.160 Vertical plane radiation characteristics, f(). [149]TEXT [150]PDF 73.182 Engineering standards of allocation. [151]TEXT [152]PDF 73.183 Groundwave signals. [153]TEXT [154]PDF 73.184 Groundwave field strength graphs. [ [155]Groundwave Field Strength Graphs ] [156]TEXT [157]PDF 73.185 Computation of
- http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/includes/63-amfmrule.htm
- [80]TEXT [81]PDF 73.127 Use of multiplex transmission. [82]TEXT [83]PDF 73.128 AM stereophonic broadcasting. [84]TEXT [85]PDF 73.132 Territorial exclusivity. [86]TEXT [87]PDF 73.150 Directional antenna systems. [88]TEXT [89]PDF 73.151 Field strength measurements to establish performance of directional antennas. [90]TEXT [91]PDF 73.152 Modification of directional antenna data. [92]TEXT [93]PDF 73.153 Field strength measurements in support of applications or evidence at hearings. [94]TEXT [95]PDF 73.154 AM directional antenna partial proof of performance measurements. [96]TEXT [97]PDF 73.157 Antenna testing during daytime. [98]TEXT [99]PDF 73.158 Directional antenna monitoring points. [100]TEXT [101]PDF 73.160 Vertical plane radiation characteristics, f(). [102]TEXT [103]PDF 73.182 Engineering standards of allocation. [104]TEXT [105]PDF 73.183 Groundwave signals. [106]TEXT [107]PDF 73.184 Groundwave field strength graphs. [ [108]Groundwave Field Strength Graphs ] [109]TEXT [110]PDF 73.185 Computation of