FCC Web Documents citing 73.3520

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2683A1.txt
  • tech box proposal. However, such singleton applicants may not specify in the FCC Form 301 application a change in the proposed facility that constitutes a major change from the facility specified earlier, nor may applicants create new mutual exclusivities or application conflicts. See Broadcast Auction First Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 15991. See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3518 and 73.3520. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.5006. $ $ - 6 7 < = > ~  � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��- >��r�Kp��-~i�f�M�� z} ���� tm��(c)��cv `���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3596A1.txt
  • Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 15991. 6 See Reexamination of the Comparative Standards for Noncommercial Educational Applicants, Second Report and Order, 18 FCC 6691, 6699-6700 �� 22-24 (2003). Applicants that did not check the ``noncommercial educational'' applicant status box must submit the required filing fees with their applications. 47 C.F.R. � 73.503(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3518 and 73.3520. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.5006. $ $ $ + 3 > J S T Y Z [ � � � � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��-
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3406A1.txt
  • First Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 15991. See Reexamination of the Comparative Standards for Noncommercial Educational Applicants, Second Report and Order, 18 FCC 6691, 6699-6700 �� 22-24 (2003). Applicants that did not check the ``noncommercial educational'' applicant status box must submit the required filing fees with their applications. 47 C.F.R. � 73.503(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3518 and 73.3520. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.5006. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 8 9 W [ \ ^ b n : ; $ ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v``
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-349A1.txt
  • more than 30 days to object to the application and failed to do so). See CDBS Public Access, http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/app_list .pl. The most recent version and all superceded versions of the application are available on the Commission's public access database. For example, because both applications can be effectuated, the applications are not ``inconsistent'' under 47 C.F.R. � 73.3518. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3520 prohibits multiple applications for service in the same community, in this instance, each application concerns service in a different community. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 February 12, 2008 � � � � � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-629A1.txt
  • Streamlining of Mass Media Applications, Rules, and Processes, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 17525, 17541, n.56 (1999) (``Streamlining MO&O'') and Texas Grace Communications, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 19167 (2001)). Borman's minor and major change applications could be pending concurrently because applications to serve different communities are not considered to be conflicting. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3520. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See also WWIZ, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub nom. Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 967 (1966). See WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC at 686. It took the Commission considerable time to act on Borman's original Tye proposal because she
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288554A1.pdf
  • APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR CHANGE TO A LICENSED FACILITY DISMISSED , PHOENIX CHAN-41 E AZ Minor change in licensed facilities, callsign KPDF-CA. UNA VEZ MAS PHOENIX LICENSE, LLC KPDF-CA 73764 BPTTA-20040726ADX AZ FM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR CHANGE TO A LICENSED FACILITY DISMISSED , BOZEMAN 93.7 MHZ E MT Minor change in licensed facilities. Dismissed by letter 2/13/2009 (47 CFR Section 73.3520 violation) REIER BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. KOBB-FM 16776 BPH-20061030API MT , AUGUSTA 90.7 MHZ E GA Mod of CP to chg Dismissed by letter 2/13/2009 GEORGIA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WACG-FM 23922 BPED-20081205AAI GA DIGITAL TRANSLATOR OR DIGITAL LPTV APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR MODIFICATION TO A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DISMISSED , ANTON CHAN-24 E CO Modification of construction permit file number BDISDTT-20060329AEW. REGION 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306529A1.pdf
  • 106.7 MHZ E NY Voluntary Assignment of License From: PRG LLC To: SOUND COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Form 314 PRG LLC W294AW 141382 BALFT-20110310ACB NY 05/10/2011 Actions of: LOW POWER FM APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR CHANGE TO A LICENSED FACILITY DISMISSED , MELBOURNE 93.1 MHZ E FL Low Power FM minor change in licensed facilities. Dismissed 5/10/2011 (no letter sent) (47 CFR Section 73.3520 violation) BREVARD YOUTH EDUCATION BROADCASTING CORPORATION WGRV-LP 135636 BPL-20110509AAM FL AM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR LICENSE TO COVER GRANTED , MILFORD 1450 KHZ P PA License to cover. DIGITAL RADIO BROADCASTING, INC. WMJQ 161541 BL-20110407ADA PA , BRANDENBURG 1140 KHZ P KY License to cover. MEADE COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. WMMG 40927 BL-20110413AEN KY Page 3 of 14 Broadcast Actions 5/13/2011 PUBLIC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/amfmrule.html
  • Page ] [590]TEXT [591]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [592]TEXT [593]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [594]TEXT [595]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [596]TEXT [597]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [598]TEXT [599]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [600]TEXT [601]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [602]TEXT [603]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [604]TEXT [605]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [606]TEXT [607]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [608]TEXT [609]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [610]TEXT [611]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [612]TEXT [613]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [614]TEXT [615]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in renewal proceedings. [616]TEXT [617]PDF 73.3525 Agreements for removing application conflicts. [618]TEXT [619]PDF 73.3526 Local public inspection file of commercial stations. [620]TEXT [621]PDF 73.3527 Local public inspection file of noncommercial
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/da002142.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/da002142.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/da002142.txt
  • schedule of charges at 47 C.F.R. � 1.1104. Method and form of payment is addressed in 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1109, 1.1110. See also the Mass Media Services Application Fee Filing Guide and the FCC Form 301 instructions. The Commission has significantly revised FCC Form 301 and/or the fee schedule since these applications were filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3518 and 73.3520. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3571. All filings delivered in this manner must be in an envelope clearly marked for the ``Federal Communications Commission'' addressed to the attention of ``Wholesale Lockbox Shift Supervisor,'' and identified with the appropriate Post Office Box address as set forth in the fee schedule at 47 C.F.R. � 1.1104. See 47 C.F.R. � 0.401(b). See 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fc00019a.doc
  • Section 73.1745-Unauthorized operation. Section 73.1750-Discontinuance of operation. Section 73.1920-Personal attacks. Section 73.1940-Legally qualified candidates for public office. Section 73.1941-Equal opportunities. Section 73.1943-Political file. Section 73.1944-Reasonable access. Section 73.3511-Applications required. Section 73.3512-Where to file; number of copies. Section 73.3513-Signing of applications. Section 73.3514-Content of applications. Section 73.3516-Specification of facilities. Section 73.3517-Contingent applications. Section 73.3518-Inconsistent or conflicting applications. Section 73.3519-Repetitious applications. Section 73.3520-Multiple applications. Section 73.3525-Agreements for removing application conflicts. Section 73.3539-Application for renewal of license. Section 73.3542-Application for emergency authorization. Section 73.3545-Application for permit to deliver programs to foreign stations. Section 73.3550-Requests for new or modified call sign assignments. Section 73.3561-Staff consideration of applications requiring Commission consideration. Section 73.3562-Staff consideration of applications not requiring action by the Commission. Section 73.3566-Defective applications. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da002142.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da002142.pdf
  • schedule of charges at 47 C.F.R. � 1.1104. Method and form of payment is addressed in 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1109, 1.1110. See also the Mass Media Services Application Fee Filing Guide and the FCC Form 301 instructions. The Commission has significantly revised FCC Form 301 and/or the fee schedule since these applications were filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3518 and 73.3520. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3571. All filings delivered in this manner must be in an envelope clearly marked for the ``Federal Communications Commission'' addressed to the attention of ``Wholesale Lockbox Shift Supervisor,'' and identified with the appropriate Post Office Box address as set forth in the fee schedule at 47 C.F.R. � 1.1104. See 47 C.F.R. � 0.401(b). See 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-349A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-349A1.pdf
  • more than 30 days to object to the application and failed to do so). See CDBS Public Access, http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/app_list .pl. The most recent version and all superceded versions of the application are available on the Commission's public access database. For example, because both applications can be effectuated, the applications are not ``inconsistent'' under 47 C.F.R. � 73.3518. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3520 prohibits multiple applications for service in the same community, in this instance, each application concerns service in a different community. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 February 12, 2008 � � � � � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-629A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-629A1.pdf
  • Streamlining of Mass Media Applications, Rules, and Processes, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 17525, 17541, n.56 (1999) (``Streamlining MO&O'') and Texas Grace Communications, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 19167 (2001)). Borman's minor and major change applications could be pending concurrently because applications to serve different communities are not considered to be conflicting. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3520. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See also WWIZ, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub nom. Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 967 (1966). See WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC at 686. It took the Commission considerable time to act on Borman's original Tye proposal because she
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/93-301.pdf
  • allowedapplicantstonegotiateacceptableinterference.In ourAmendmentofPart73oftheCommission'sRulesto PermitShort-SpacedFMStationAssignmentsbyUsingDirec- tionalAntennas,6FCCRcd5356,5361(1991),weestab- lishedthatwewerethesolearbiterindetermining interferencestandardsanddisallowedapplicantsfromnego- tiatinginterferencestandardsonacase-by-casebasis.There- in.wefurthernotedthatonestation'sacceptanceof interferencewouldprecludesomefuturefacilitychanges bythestationwhichcausestheinterference.'Furthermore. NewCove-nantinvolvedthirdadjacentchanneloverlap, whereasthiscaseinvolvesfirstadjacentchanneloverlap.In EducationalInformationCorporation,6FCCRcdat2208, wedistinguishedfirst-adjacentchanneloverlapfromsec- ond-orthird-adjacentchannelcontouroverlap: Overlapofco-channelorfirstadjacentchannelsig- nalsisamoreseriousmattersincetheinterference thatmayoccurresultsinthelossofserviceovera widearea.Secondorthirdadjacentchanneloverlap mayresultinthereplacementofonesignalbyan- other(notthecompletelossofservice)andiscon- finedtoaverysmallareaaroundthetransmitterof theinterferingstation.Inaddition.thepotentialfor suchinterferencetooccurdependstoagreatextent onthequalityofthereceiversusedwithintheaf- fectedarea. Finally.wenotethatinNewCovenantthestaffwaivedas deminimisthirdadjacentinterferencewithin2.1%ofthe protectedservicearea.whereasintheinstantcaseap- plicantsseekawaiveroffirstadjacentinterferencewithin 6.9%oftheprotectedservicearea.Inshort.theNewCoven antdecision,totheextentitremainsviable.isnotanalo- (e.g.coveredbyalake),whichhasbeenaconsiderationin previouswaivers.Finally,thereisnosignificancetothefact thatthestationfromwhichOpenMediawouldreceiveinterfer- encereceivesinterferencefromyetanotherstation,asallegedby OpenMedia. FCC93-301 goustothecircumstancespresentedhere.Weconclude thatawaiverinthiscaseongroundsthattheproposed overlapisdeminimisisnotwarranted. 9.Insummary,theoperativefactsarethatOpenMedia's noncompliancewithSection73.509(a)oftheCommission's RulesisvoluntaryandthatOpenMediahasfailedto demonstrateitsentitlementtoawaiver.Absentsucha demonstration,itsapplicationwasproperlyreturned.Ac- cordingly,weaffirmthestaffaction. 10.ReconsiderationofGrantofNIU/REBFApplication.In itspetitionforreconsideration,OpenMediaarguesthatthe staffviolateditsAshbackersrightsandSection73.3591 (Grantswithouthearing)oftheCommission'sRulesin makinganexpartegrantofaconstructionpermitto NIU/REBF.OpenMediaalsoallegesthatNIU/REBFmis- representedandfailedtodemonstrateitsfinancialquali- fications.failedtocomplywithSection1.65ofthe Commission'sRulesandviolatedtheCommission'sex parterules.OpenMediafurtherarguesthatgrantofthe NIU/RBEFapplicationviolatesSection307(b)oftheCom- municationsActof1934,asamended,aswellasSections 73.3517(Contingentapplications),73.3518(Inconsistentor conflictingapplications)and73.3520(Multipleapplica- tions)oftheCommission'sRulesandiscontrarytopublic policy.Finally,petitionerclaimsthatinquiryiswarranted todeterminewhetherNIU/REBFfalselystateditsintended communityoflicense. 11.Wedenyreconsiderationforthefollowingreasons. Initially,thereisnoviolationofOpenMedia'sAshbacker rightsnorviolationofSection73.3591oftheCommission's Rules.Initsletterissuingtheconstructionpermitto NIU/REBFwhileOpenMedia'sapplicationforreviewof thedismissalofitsapplicationwaspending,thestaffcited MeridianCommunications,2FCCRcd5904(Rev.Bd. 1987).ContrarytoOpenMedia'scontentions,wefindthat casetobeapposite.Meridianholdsthatasamatteroflaw andCommissionapplicationprocessingpolicy,grantofan applicationcannotbecomefinaluntilthepetitionforre- considerationorapplicationforreviewchallengingdis- missalofamutuallyexclusiveapplicationisadjudicated. Simplystated,thecloudoverthegrantedapplicationwill notdissipateuntilreconsiderationorreviewisgrantedor denied.Thus,thegranttoNIU/REBFdoesnotprevent OpenMediafromhavingitsapplicationforreviewdecided bytheCommissionandNIU/REBFareonnoticethatthey proceedtoconstructattheirownrisk.Indeed,atpage4of theJanuary23.1990,constructionpermittoNIU/REBF thefollowingstatementappears: Theissuanceofthispermitisconditionedonthe outcomeoftheapplicationforreviewfiledbyOpen MediaCorporation.Accordingly.anyconstruction undertakenpursuanttothispermitisatthe permittee'ssolerisk. Thus.OpenMedia'sAshbackerrightswerenotviolatedby issuanceoftheconstructionpermittoNIU/REBF.More- over,sinceOpenMediahasnotbeenprejudicedbythe grantoftheconstructionpermit,itsallegationswithrespect 5 AshbackerRadioCorp.v.FCC,326U.S.327,333(1945). 6Similarly,NIU/REBF'sfailuretoserveOpenMediawithits December5,1989,responsetotheCommissioninquirydoesnot raiseasubstantialandmaterialquestionoffact.Itiswell FederalCommunicationsCommissionRecord 8FCCRcd.No.13 tononcompliancewithSection73.3591oftheCommis- sion'sRulesareimmaterial.Similarly,totheextentthat theremayhavebeenatechnicalviolationoftheCommis- sion'sexparterulesinthatOpenMediawasnotsenta copyoftheJanuary23,1990,constructionpermitissuedto NIU/REBF.--itwasharmlesserror.WenotethataPublic Notice(ReportNo.20776)oftheactiongrantingthecon- structionpermitwasreleasedonJanuary29,1990.Accord- ingly.OpenMediawasnotprejudicedasisevidencedby thefactthatittimelyfileditspetitionforreconsideration.6 12.WealsorejectOpenMedia'sallegationsthat NIU/REBFwasnotfinanciallyqualified.misrepresented factsandfailedtocomplywithSection1.65oftheCom- mission'sRuleswithrespecttoitsfinancialqualifications. NIU/REBF,intheirapplication,answered"no"tothe questionabouttheirdependenceuponaPublicTelecom- municationsFacilitiesProgram("PTFP")grant.However theyapparentlyhadalsoappliedforaPTFPgrant.The staffinterpretedtheapplicationforaPTFPgrantasimply-
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/amfmrule.html
  • Page ] [590]TEXT [591]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [592]TEXT [593]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [594]TEXT [595]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [596]TEXT [597]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [598]TEXT [599]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [600]TEXT [601]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [602]TEXT [603]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [604]TEXT [605]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [606]TEXT [607]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [608]TEXT [609]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [610]TEXT [611]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [612]TEXT [613]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [614]TEXT [615]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in renewal proceedings. [616]TEXT [617]PDF 73.3525 Agreements for removing application conflicts. [618]TEXT [619]PDF 73.3526 Local public inspection file of commercial stations. [620]TEXT [621]PDF 73.3527 Local public inspection file of noncommercial
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/includes/63-amfmrule.htm
  • Page ] [543]TEXT [544]PDF 73.3500 Application and report forms. [545]TEXT [546]PDF 73.3511 Applications required. [547]TEXT [548]PDF 73.3512 Where to file; number of copies. [549]TEXT [550]PDF 73.3513 Signing of applications. [551]TEXT [552]PDF 73.3514 Content of applications. [553]TEXT [554]PDF 73.3516 Specification of facilities. [555]TEXT [556]PDF 73.3517 Contingent applications. [557]TEXT [558]PDF 73.3518 Inconsistent or conflicting applications. [559]TEXT [560]PDF 73.3519 Repetitious applications. [561]TEXT [562]PDF 73.3520 Multiple applications. [563]TEXT [564]PDF 73.3521 Mutually exclusive applications for low power television, television translators and television booster stations. [565]TEXT [566]PDF 73.3522 Amendment of applications. [567]TEXT [568]PDF 73.3523 Dismissal of applications in renewal proceedings. [569]TEXT [570]PDF 73.3525 Agreements for removing application conflicts. [571]TEXT [572]PDF 73.3526 Local public inspection file of commercial stations. [573]TEXT [574]PDF 73.3527 Local public inspection file of noncommercial