FCC Web Documents citing 76.1504

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • an open video system is subject to streamlined regulation under Title VI. Need: These rules implement Section 302(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 573. Section Number and Title: 76.1500 Definitions. 76.1501 Qualifications to be an open video system operator. 76.1502 Certification. 76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open video systems. 76.1504 Rates, terms and condition of carriage on open video systems. 76.1505 Public, educational and governmental access. 76.1506 Carriage of television broadcast signals. 76.1507 Competitive access to satellite cable programming. 76.1508 Network non-duplication. 76.1509 Syndicated program exclusivity. 76.1510 Application of certain Title VI provisions. 76.1511 Fees. 76.1512 Programming information. 76.1513 Open video dispute resolution. 76.1514 Bundling of video and local exchange
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-996A1.txt
  • raised by Digital Broadcasting's application and the extremely brief comment deadline, we will consider NATOA and the City of Boston's submissions as informal comments to the Commission. See 47 U.S.C. § 573(a)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 76.1502(a) (``an operator of an open video system must certify to the Commission that it will comply with the Commission's regulations in 47 CFR 76.1503, 76.1504, 76.1506(m), 76.1508, 76.1509, and 76.1513.''). Id. at 18247; 47 C.F.R. § 76.1502(a). Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 18245-46. For purposes of determining whether a party is an affiliate, we have adopted the definitions contained in the notes to Section 76.501 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. § 76.501, with certain modifications. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.1500(g) & (h).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-86A1.txt
  • relevant information. See AT&T Corporation v. Bell Atlantic - Pennsylvania, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 7467, 7471-72 ¶ 10 (2000). However, that case did not involve a Commission-prescribed presumptively reasonable rate or a rulemaking proceeding in which the Commission established specific cost-study requirements for carriers seeking to exceed a presumptively reasonable rate. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.1504(d) (assigning the burden of proof to the defendant open video system operator in complaint proceedings involving claims that the operator is not charging the presumptively reasonable rate). Wood County also contends that McLeod waived its right to argue the burden of proof issue by purportedly failing to address it in its initial brief. Reply Brief of Wood County Telephone Company,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-86A1.html
  • to relevant information. See AT&T Corporation v. Bell Atlantic - Pennsylvania, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 7467, 7471-72 10 (2000). However, that case did not involve a Commission-prescribed presumptively reasonable rate or a rulemaking proceeding in which the Commission established specific cost-study requirements for carriers seeking to exceed a presumptively reasonable rate. 37 See 47 C.F.R. 76.1504(d) (assigning the burden of proof to the defendant open video system operator in complaint proceedings involving claims that the operator is not charging the presumptively reasonable rate). 38 Wood County also contends that McLeod waived its right to argue the burden of proof issue by purportedly failing to address it in its initial brief. Reply Brief of Wood County Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form1275/1275.pdf
  • Number: , Phone Number: Yes No N/A 1. If you are a cable operator applying for certification within your cable franchise area, are you qualified to operate an open video system under 47 C.F.R. § 76.1501 ? ? Do you agree to comply and to remain in compliance with each of the Commission's regulations in 47 C.F .R. §§ 76.1503, 76.1504, 76.1506(m), 76.1508, 76.1509, and 76.1513? 3. Do you agree to comply with the Commission's notice and enrollment requirements Tor unaffiliated video programming providers? 4. If applicable, do you agree to file changes to your cost allocation manual at least 60 days before the commencement of service? , .t:>rovide a general description of the anticipated communities or areas to be served
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-86A1.html
  • to relevant information. See AT&T Corporation v. Bell Atlantic - Pennsylvania, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 7467, 7471-72 10 (2000). However, that case did not involve a Commission-prescribed presumptively reasonable rate or a rulemaking proceeding in which the Commission established specific cost-study requirements for carriers seeking to exceed a presumptively reasonable rate. 37 See 47 C.F.R. 76.1504(d) (assigning the burden of proof to the defendant open video system operator in complaint proceedings involving claims that the operator is not charging the presumptively reasonable rate). 38 Wood County also contends that McLeod waived its right to argue the burden of proof issue by purportedly failing to address it in its initial brief. Reply Brief of Wood County Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • Definitions. [162]76.1301 Prohibited practices. [163]76.1302 Carriage agreement proceedings. [164]76.13031305 [Reserved] Subpart R -- Telecommunications Act Implementation [165]76.1400 Purpose. [166]76.1402 CPST rate complaints. [167]76.1404 Use of cable facilities by local exchange carriers. Subpart S -- Open Video Systems [168]76.1500 Definitions. [169]76.1501 Qualifications to be an open video system operator. [170]76.1502 Certification. [171]76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open video systems. [172]76.1504 Rates, terms and conditions for carriage on open video systems. [173]76.1505 Public, educational and governmental access. [174]76.1506 Carriage of television broadcast signals. [175]76.1507 Competitive access to satellite cable programming. [176]76.1508 Network non-duplication. [177]76.1509 Syndicated program exclusivity. [178]76.1510 Application of certain Title VI provisions. [179]76.1511 Fees. [180]76.1512 Programming information. [181]76.1513 Open video dispute resolution. [182]76.1514 Bundling of video and local exchange
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • Carriage agreement proceedings. §§ 76.1303-76.1305 [Reserved] Subpart R-Telecommunications Act Implementation § 76.1400 Purpose. § 76.1402 CPST rate complaints. § 76.1404 Use of cable facilities by local exchange carriers. Subpart S-Open Video Systems § 76.1500 Definitions. § 76.1501 Qualifications to be an open video system operator. § 76.1502 Certification. § 76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open video systems. § 76.1504 Rates, terms and conditions for carriage on open video systems. § 76.1505 Public, educational and governmental access. § 76.1506 Carriage of television broadcast signals. § 76.1507 Competitive access to satellite cable programming. § 76.1508 Network non-duplication. § 76.1509 Syndicated program exclusivity. § 76.1510 Application of certain Title VI provisions. § 76.1511 Fees. § 76.1512 Programming information. § 76.1513 Open video