FCC Web Documents citing 80.5

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.pdf
  • between two or more persons. Reflecting that public correspondence service is offered by coast stations on a common carrier basis, public correspondence is defined more precisely under the Part 80 Maritime Service Rules as ``[a]ny telecommunication which the offices and stations must, by reason of their being at the disposal of the public, accept for transmission.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). Private correspondence consists of communications serving the user's business and operational needs. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f), including accompanying tables and notes. See id. (describing conditions for use as Coast Guard Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) in certain areas). See also 47 C.F.R. � 80.5 (defining VTS as a ``U.S. Coast Guard control service for ships
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2203A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2203A1.pdf
  • between two or more persons. Reflecting that public correspondence service is offered by coast stations on a common carrier basis, public correspondence is defined more precisely under the Part 80 Maritime Service Rules as ``[a]ny telecommunication which the offices and stations must, by reason of their being at the disposal of the public, accept for transmission.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See File No. 0002806667, FCC 601 - Schedule H at 3-5, 7, requesting 156.275 MHz, 156.325 MHz, 156.350, 156.500, 156.550, 156.600, 156.850, 157.000, and 161.600 MHz; see also ``Frequencies'' tab. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f), including accompanying tables and notes. The nine frequencies are on private communication channels allocated under Part 80 for maritime use (Channels 65A, 66A, 07A, 10,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-438A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-438A1.pdf
  • 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200832860001 (Enf. Bur., Western Region, Honolulu Resident Agent Office, released May 29, 2008). 47 C.F.R.. � 80.89(a). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. 47 C.F.R. � 80.334. 47 C.F.R. � 80.335(e). See 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193 - 87.199. See, e.g., Grant Lam, 22 FCC Rcd 6341 (EB 2007); AMERI-KING Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 2616 (EB 2008); Compatible Electronics, 23 FCC Rcd 2621 (EB 2008). NAL at para. 5. Mens rea is defined ``[a]s an element of criminal responsibility: a guilty mind; a guilty
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-590A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-590A1.pdf
  • Honolulu Resident Agent Office, rel. May 29, 2008) (NAL). 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). Section 80.89(a) of the Rules states that ``[s]tations must not: . . . [e]ngage in superfluous radiocommunications.'' 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). An EPIRB station is ``a station in the maritime mobile service the emissions of which are intended to facilitate search and rescue operations.'' 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. A distress alert, such as one from an EPIRB, is considered false ``if it was transmitted without any indication that a mobile unit or person was in distress and required immediate assistance.'' 47 C.F.R. � 80.334. The Rules require that ``[i]f for any reason an EPIRB is activated inadvertently [the licensee shall] immediately contact the nearest U.S. Coast Guard unit
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.txt
  • 1. The authority citation for Part 80 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 4, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply 48 Stat. 1064-1068, 1081-1105, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151-155, 301-609; 3 UST 3450, 3 UST 4726, 12 UST 2377. Section 80.5 is amended to read as follows: Subpart A - General Information * * * * * � 80.5 Definitions. * * * * * Digital selective calling (DSC). * * * The operational and technical characteristics of this system are contained in Recommendations ITU-R M.493 and ITU-R M.541. (See subpart W of this part.) * * * * * Distress
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-271A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-271A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-271A1.txt
  • and imminent danger and in need of immediate assistance; (2) a Level 2 event is one in which there is a particular urgency regarding the safety of an entity; and (3) a Level 3 event is one in which a delay in a communication transmission could adversely affect the safety or property of an entity. See generally 47 C.F.R. � 80.5 (providing definitions for priorities in the Maritime Services). See Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements for Meeting Federal, State and Local Public Safety Agency Communication Requirements Through the Year 2010, WT Docket No. 96-86, FCC 00-242, Second Report and Order, July 13, 2000. Id. � 6 NCC Report at 15 � 47. Id. at 15 � 45; see supra
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • determinations are consistent with the DTV Sixth Report and Order. There, the Commission specified a minimum geographic separation of 250 km (155 miles) for co-channel operations between DTV stations and the city-center in the areas where there are existing land mobile operations. Section 90.305(a) of our rules provides that full power land mobile base stations can be located up to 80.5 km (50 miles) from the city-center of one of the specified cities. Consequently, under the geographic separation standards adopted in the DTV Sixth Report and Order, a land mobile base station could choose to locate its station as close as 169.5 km (250 km - 80.5 km), or 105 miles to a neighboring DTV station. At this distance, a typical
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.txt
  • operator from providing both interconnected and non-interconnected services. Consequently, we propose to retain the interconnection requirement for AMTS licensees providing public correspondence service, but amend Section 80.475 to provide that such licensees may also provide non-interconnected service, and that AMTS licensees providing only private mobile radio service need not be interconnected. In this regard, we also propose to revise Section 80.5 to remove ``interconnected'' as a required characteristic of all AMTS operations. Proposals for additional operational flexibility. We note that Maritel proposes additional changes to the service rules governing VPC licensees. Generally, Maritel proposes to permit VPC geographic area licensees to choose whether to provide maritime public correspondence services. In addition, it asserts that Part 80 regulatory obligations, particularly Part 80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A5.txt
  • 7020318OD 1 7 1 143 15 21 1400 101 7020318OD 1 5 2 316 42 80 3200 116 7020318OD 1 6 3 1512 609 417.6 3600 105 7020318OD 1 7 3 627 195 162.4 1400 67 7020318OD 1 5 4 2025 2110 184 3200 278 7020318OD 1 6 4 2384 2373 207 3600 4 7020318OD 1 7 4 717 694 80.5 1400 105 7020318OD 2 7 1 143 15 28 1400 66 7020318OD 2 5 2 316 42 35.2 3200 121 7020318OD 2 6 2 316 48 39.6 3600 2 7020318OD 2 5 3 1222 542 307.2 3200 3 7020318OD 2 6 3 1512 609 345.6 3600 241 7020318OD 2 7 3 627 195 343 1400 23 7020318OD 2 5 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2024A1.txt
  • 6, 8, portions of 9, portions of 12, and 18, January 24, 2002 Petition for Declaratory Ruling at 10-17. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2. See Amendment of Parts 2 and 80 of the Commission's Rules Applicable to Automated Maritime Telecommunications Systems (AMTS), First Report and Order, GEN Docket No. 88-732, 6 FCC Rcd 437, 437 � 3 (1991). 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See question 9, January 24, 2002 Petition for Declaratory Ruling at 12. 47 C.F.R. � 80.475(c). See Amendment of Parts 2, 81 and 83 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum for an Automated Inland Waterways Communications System (IWCS) along the Mississippi River and Connecting Waterways, Report and Order, Gen. Docket No. 80-1, 84 FCC 2d 875, 881 � 19
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2847A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2847A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2847A1.txt
  • not qualify for mandatory carriage rights because it does not provide Blytheville's principal headend with a good quality signal as required by Sections 76.55(d)(4) and 76.55(c)(3) of the Commission's rules. In support, Blytheville states that it conducted signal strength testing on several occasions: August 24, 2001 (with readings of -76.4 dBm to -77.4 dBm); November 25, 2001 (with readings of -80.5 dBm to -81.1 dBm); December 20, 2001 (with readings of -71.9 dBm to -74.3 dBm); and on February 21, 2002 (with readings between -48.7 dBm to -49.1 dBm). Blytheville asserts that WDYR fails to understand that as a low power television station it cannot cure its signal quality deficiency by providing the cable operator with additional equipment, such as a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-287A1.txt
  • Charles K. Collins, Director of Operations, Briar Tek Incorporated, dated October 19, 2001 (Waiver request). See, e.g., Waiver request at 1. We note that OCRA is often used as an abbreviation for Ocean Recovery Cuff Assembly. EPIRBs are stations in the maritime mobile service the emissions of which are intended to facilitate search and rescue operations. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See, e.g., Waiver request at 1 and Attachment D. See Waiver request at 1. Id. at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.1055. See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.1053(a)(4) - (7). See also 80.1053(a)(14)(e). Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Request for Waiver by Briar Tek Incorporated for Type Certification of Personal 121.5 MHz Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB), Public Notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2915A1.txt
  • a radius that varies depending on the antenna height above average terrain (HAAT) and the effective radiated power (ERP). Monroe's captioned application proposes transmitters operating at a maximum ERP of 1000 watts at six locations, with antennas at heights of between thirty-nine and seventy-two meters. Under Section 22.537(f) (Table E-2) the interfering radius for each of Monroe's proposed transmitters is 80.5 km (50 mi). Id. at 8. The frequency, 931.3125 MHz, was available for commercial paging applicants in the New York City Major Economic Area (which includes Monroe County) in Auction Nos. 26 and 40 (MEA002 CZMEA002AZ 931 New York City). See Auction of Licenses for the Lower and Upper Paging Bands Scheduled for June 26, 2001, Public Notice, 16 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-985A1.txt
  • Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. �� 80.1055. See Letter to Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, FCC, from C.P Hoffman, Technical Director, McMurdo Limited, dated November 2, 2001 (Waiver request). See, e.g., Waiver request at 1. EPIRBs are stations in the maritime mobile service intended to facilitate search and rescue operations. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. A Class B EPIRB station is battery powered emergency radio transmitting device carried on vessels for use in cases of distress at sea. It is activated automatically when it floats free of a sinking ship and transmits alerting and locating signals which assist search and rescue units in responding to and finding persons in distress See Waiver request at 1.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1115A1.txt
  • service. Petition for Declaratory Ruling. We reiterate our previous conclusion that the Commission's rules do not permit AMTS licensees to provide non-interconnected private service to units on land. We find none of Havens's arguments to the contrary to be persuasive. Section 80.123 allows AMTS stations to ``provide public correspondence service to units on land.'' ``Public correspondence'' is defined in Section 80.5 of the Commission's Rules as ``[a]ny telecommunication which the offices and stations must, by reason of their being at the disposal of the public, accept for transmission.'' Havens argues that the term ``public correspondence'' as used in Section 80.123 includes non-interconnected private service. We agree with Havens that nothing in the definition of ``public correspondence'' requires interconnection to the PSTN.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2748A1.txt
  • 45 dB of co-channel interference protection within the PSA of all other authorized or previously proposed stations. An applicant seeking to make major changes to an ITFS station must include an analysis of the potential for harmful interference to any existing or previously proposed stations if the proposed transmitting antenna has an unobstructed electrical path to other stations or within 80.5 km (50 mi) of the coordinates of any such stations. Sherburne has failed to submit an adequate interference study with its modification application. Instead of providing an interference analysis, Sherburne merely submitted a list of the ITFS and MMDS stations within 100 miles and made an unsupported claim that its proposed facilities would not cause harmful interference to any station
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3176A1.txt
  • Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 80.215(e)(1); see also 47 C.F.R. � 80.215(c)(2). 47 C.F.R. �� 80.507(d), 80.519(b); see Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, PR Docket No. 92-257, 12 FCC Rcd 16949, 16979-80 � 59 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.501. 47 C.F.R. � 80.215(e)(1). Id.. 47 C.F.R. � 80.215(c)(1). Waiver Request at 1. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). The present application seeks authorization to operate on the same channels as Station WPWW813: 156.700 MHz, which is a port operations frequency, and 156.800 MHz, which is the VHF calling and distress frequency. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3614A1.txt
  • WPOJ538), 0001252156 (Call Sign WPOJ531), 0001252177 (Call Sign WPOJ537), 0001252214 (Call Sign WPOJ533), 0001252257 (Call Sign WPOJ535), 0001252280 (Call Sign WPOJ532), 0001252315 (Call Sign WPOJ534), 0001252325 (Call Sign WPOJ536), 0001252334 (Call Sign WPOJ530), Request for Rule Waiver and Extension of Construction Deadline (filed Mar. 27, 2003) (Request). MariTEL filed an identical request for each license at issue. 47 C.F.R. � 80.5; Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Third Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, PR Docket No. 92-257, 13 FCC Rcd 19853, 19856 � 3 (1998) (Third Report and Order). Id. at 19859 � 9. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.49(a)(1). Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 19870 � 34. Request at 2. Id. at 4.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1053A1.txt
  • No. 1756 (WTB rel. Feb. 25, 2004); see also Havens Section 1.65 Report (filed Apr. 13, 2004). Because our licensing records at the time of the adoption of this Order indicate that the assignments have yet to be consummated, Havens remains the licensee of record, and the request therefore remains pending with respect to all thirteen licenses. 47 C.F.R. � 80.5; Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Third Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, PR Docket No. 92-257, 13 FCC Rcd 19853, 19856 � 3 (1998) (Third Report and Order). See 47 C.F.R. � 20.9. Havens's applications to modify the licenses in question to permit PMRS were granted on March 22, 2004. See Public Notice, Rep. No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1575A1.txt
  • � 1.925(b)(3)(i). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3)(ii). I.e., ships used primarily in commerce for transporting persons or goods to or from any harbor(s) or port(s) or between places within a harbor or port area; or in connection with the construction, change in construction, servicing, maintenance, repair, loading, unloading, movement, piloting, or salvaging of any other ship or vessel. 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). 47 C.F.R. � 80.123. Public Coast Third R&O, 13 FCC Rcd at 19866 � 25; see also 47 C.F.R. � 80.371(c)(4) (permitting operation anywhere within the geographic licensee's region). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1575 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1575 ] � % / ? A [ \ ] j
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2969A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2969A1.txt
  • No. 84-18, 56 Rad. Reg. 2d (P&F) 1613, 1616 �� 9-11 (1984); Amendment of Parts 2, 81 and 83 of the Rules to Add the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the Authorized Service Area of Inland Waterways Communications Systems, Report and Order, GEN Docket No. 81-822, 51 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 440, 443 � 16 (1982). 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.385(a)(1); Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, PR Docket No. 92-257, 12 FCC Rcd 16949, 16965 � 24 (1997) (Public Coast Second Report and Order). Exelon appears to assume that service to units on land is not on a secondary basis. See Waiver Request at 13,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3408A1.txt
  • * * * * * 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). 47 C.F.R. � 0.331. Port operations communications are communications in or near a port, in locks or in waterways between coast stations and ship stations or between ship stations, which relate to the operational handling, movement and safety of ships and in emergency to the safety of persons. 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See Amendment of Parts 0, 80, and 90 of the Commission's Rules to Make the Frequency 156.250 MHz Available for Port Operations Purposes in Los Angeles and Long Beach, CA Ports, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 99-332, 15 FCC Rcd 11302 (2000). Id. at 11304-05 �� 8-10. See Letter dated March 12, 2004, from J.D. Hersey, Jr., Chief, Spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1597A1.txt
  • Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200532620003 (Enf. Bur., New Orleans Office, April 6, 2005) (``NAL''). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). 47 C.F.R. � 80.13. 47 C.F.R. �80.13(c). See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.13. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1722A1.txt
  • 2005) (Waiver Request). Section 27.1201(c)(1) of the Commission's Rules states in relevant part that ``a wireless cable entity may be licensed on EBS frequencies in areas where at least eight other EBS channels remain available in the community for future EBS use. Channels will be considered available for future EBS use if there are no co-channel operators or applicants within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the transmitter site of the proposed wireless cable operation and if the transmitter site remains available for use at reasonable terms by new EBS applicants on those channels within three years of commencing operation.'' 47 C.F.R. � 27.1201(c)(1). See Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the Commission's Rules with Regard to filing Procedures in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2365A1.txt
  • South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200532700008 (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, May 9, 2005) (``NAL''). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). 47 U.S.C. � 301. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 80.13. 47 C.F.R. � 80.13(c). See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.13. See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.txt
  • 5.441 to Section 2.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. ITU Software Suite, Space Plans' System (SPS) Version: 2.12 (including MSPACE_g), September 2002, International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Bureau (BR) Informatics Administration and Publications Department (IAP). Appendix 30B Ku-band reference database is ALOTI4AE made from input file RS35K_030403.txt and RS35K_030403.ref after recording in the List of sub-regional systems EUTELSAT EXB-80.5E, EXB-86E, EXB-83.5E, EXB-88.5E, "WARC ORB 88 FSS Plan in the 13/10-11 GHz band, APPENDIX 30B ASCII File, http://www.itu.int/ITUR/space/plans/ap30b/RS35K_030403.zip. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040227-00021, Appendix A, at 53. For more information regarding the Commission's two-degree spacing policy, see Licensing Space Stations in the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service, Report and Order, 48 F.R. 40233 (Sept. 6, 1983). See, e.g., Assignment of Orbital Locations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1_Erratum.doc
  • 5.441 to Section 2.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. ITU Software Suite, Space Plans' System (SPS) Version: 2.12 (including MSPACE_g), September 2002, International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Bureau (BR) Informatics Administration and Publications Department (IAP). Appendix 30B Ku-band reference database is ALOTI4AE made from input file RS35K_030403.txt and RS35K_030403.ref after recording in the List of sub-regional systems EUTELSAT EXB-80.5E, EXB-86E, EXB-83.5E, EXB-88.5E, "WARC ORB 88 FSS Plan in the 13/10-11 GHz band, APPENDIX 30B ASCII File, http://www.itu.int/ITUR/space/plans/ap30b/RS35K_030403.zip. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040227-00021, Appendix A, at 53. For more information regarding the Commission's two-degree spacing policy, see Licensing Space Stations in the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service, Report and Order, 48 F.R. 40233 (Sept. 6, 1983). See, e.g., Assignment of Orbital Locations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-435A1.txt
  • August 4, 1996. Section 27.1201(c)(1) of the Commission's Rules states in relevant part that ``a wireless cable entity may be licensed on EBS frequencies in areas where at least eight other EBS channels remain available in the community for future EBS use. Channels will be considered available for future EBS use if there are no co-channel operators or applicants within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the transmitter site of the proposed wireless cable operation and if the transmitter site remains available for use at reasonable terms by new EBS applicants on those channels within three years of commencing operation.'' 47 C.F.R. � 27.1201(c)(1). See Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the Commission's Rules with Regard to filing Procedures in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1086A1.txt
  • methods to locate or monitor mobile radio units. LMS systems may transmit and receive voice and non-voice status and instructional information related to such units. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.7. Public coast stations are commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) providers that allow ships to send and receive messages and to interconnect with the public switched telephone network. 47 C.F.R. � 80.5; Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Third Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, PR Docket No. 92-257, 13 FCC Rcd 19853, 19856 � 3 (1998). Licensees may, however, modify their licenses to permit private mobile radio service (PMRS) instead of CMRS, and may provide service to units on land. See 47 C.F.R. � 20.9; 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1311A1.pdf
  • communications between two or more persons. Reflecting that public correspondence service is offered by coast stations on a common carrier basis, public correspondence is defined more precisely under the Part 80 Maritime Service Rules as "[a]ny telecommunication which the offices and stations must, by reason of their being at the disposal of the public, accept for transmission." See47 C.F.R. � 80.5. Specified that AMTS stations providing PLMR service do not have to be interconnected to the public switched telephone network, but retained that interconnection requirement for AMTS stations providing CMRS. Clarified that VPC and AMTS licensees providing service to units on land must continue to ensure that maritime communications have priority, while also clarifying that a licensee's practice of dedicating separate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1971A1.txt
  • Opinion and Order, 88 FCC 2d 678 (1981), aff'd sub nom. WJG Tel. Co. v. FCC, 675 F.2d 386 (D.C. Cir. 1982). Public correspondence is defined under the Part 80 Maritime Service Rules as ``[a]ny telecommunication which the offices and stations must, by reason of their being at the disposal of the public, accept for transmission.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. Warren C. Havens Petition for Declaratory Ruling or Waiver Regarding Section 80.123 and other Commission Rules as Applied to Automated Maritime Telecommunications System Licenses, Order, 18 FCC Rcd 7006, 7008, para. 5 (WTB PSPWD 2003); Letter from D'wana R. Terry, Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Warren C. Havens, 17 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • 083� 32' 10'' W Red River, AR.............. 33� 19' 48'' N, 093� 33' 01'' W San Diego, CA.............. 32� 34' 42'' N, 116� 58' 11'' W Silver Lake, MS............ 33� 08' 42'' N, 091� 01' 16'' W US230 The bands 422.1875-425.4875 MHz and 427.1875-429.9875 MHz are allocated to the land mobile service on a primary basis for non-Federal use within 80.5 kilometers (50 miles) of Cleveland, OH (41� 29' 51.2'' N, 81� 41' 49.5'' W) and Detroit, MI (42� 19' 48.1'' N, 83� 02' 56.7'' W). The bands 423.8125-425.4875 MHz and 428.8125-429.9875 MHz are allocated to the land mobile service on a primary basis for non-Federal use within 80.5 kilometers of Buffalo, NY (42� 52' 52.2'' N, 78� 52' 20.1'' W).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.txt
  • between two or more persons. Reflecting that public correspondence service is offered by coast stations on a common carrier basis, public correspondence is defined more precisely under the Part 80 Maritime Service Rules as ``[a]ny telecommunication which the offices and stations must, by reason of their being at the disposal of the public, accept for transmission.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). Private correspondence consists of communications serving the user's business and operational needs. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f), including accompanying tables and notes. See id. (describing conditions for use as Coast Guard Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) in certain areas). See also 47 C.F.R. � 80.5 (defining VTS as a ``U.S. Coast Guard control service for ships
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2203A1.txt
  • between two or more persons. Reflecting that public correspondence service is offered by coast stations on a common carrier basis, public correspondence is defined more precisely under the Part 80 Maritime Service Rules as ``[a]ny telecommunication which the offices and stations must, by reason of their being at the disposal of the public, accept for transmission.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See File No. 0002806667, FCC 601 - Schedule H at 3-5, 7, requesting 156.275 MHz, 156.325 MHz, 156.350, 156.500, 156.550, 156.600, 156.850, 157.000, and 161.600 MHz; see also ``Frequencies'' tab. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f), including accompanying tables and notes. The nine frequencies are on private communication channels allocated under Part 80 for maritime use (Channels 65A, 66A, 07A, 10,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-438A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200832860001 (Enf. Bur., Western Region, Honolulu Resident Agent Office, released May 29, 2008). 47 C.F.R.. � 80.89(a). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E). 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. 47 C.F.R. � 80.334. 47 C.F.R. � 80.335(e). See 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193 - 87.199. See, e.g., Grant Lam, 22 FCC Rcd 6341 (EB 2007); AMERI-KING Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 2616 (EB 2008); Compatible Electronics, 23 FCC Rcd 2621 (EB 2008). NAL at para. 5. Mens rea is defined ``[a]s an element of criminal responsibility: a guilty mind; a guilty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1311A1.txt
  • justification for retaining an interconnection requirement for the provision of private radio service. We believe AMTS licensees should have the option to provide interconnected CMRS service or non-interconnected private correspondence service as marketplace demand dictates.''); Coast Station Recon Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 537-38 � 13 (amending Section 80.385(a)(1) to conform to the Coast Station Flexibility Order's amendments to Sections 80.5 and 80.475(d)). See MC/LM Petition at 2; PSI Petition at 3-4. See Coast Station Flexibility Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8981 � 16. We expect Verde to comply with all relevant Part 80 requirements, even as a PMRS provider, unless and until it obtains a waiver of such requirements. Should Verde file a waiver request in the future in connection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1311A1_Rcd.pdf
  • no justification for retaining an interconnection requirement for the provision of private radio service. We believe AMTS licensees should have the option to provide interconnected CMRS service ornon-interconnected private correspondence service as marketplace demand dictates."); Coast Station Recon Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 537-38 � 13 (amending Section 80.385(a)(1) to conform to the Coast Station Flexibility Order's amendments to Sections 80.5 and 80.475(d)). 27SeeMC/LM Petition at 2; PSIPetition at 3-4. 28See Coast Station Flexibility Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8981 � 16. 9169 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1311 not specifically address how the proposed PMRS operations would be consistent with the Part 80 AMTS rules.29 9. Conclusion and Ordering Clauses. The Section 20.9(b) certifications submitted with the subject applications sufficiently describe
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-831A1.txt
  • supplemental information on November 10, 2009. See Letter dated November 10, 2009 from Rene Stiegler, President, ShipCom, LLC to Scot Stone, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Supplement). Public coast stations are land stations in the maritime mobile service that are open to public correspondence, and render a common carrier service to ship radio stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See Waiver Request at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.123 introductory paragraph. See Waiver Request at 1. See Supplement at 1. See Waiver Request at 2. ShipCom explains that the 6.1 meter antenna height limit in Section 80.123(e) is proper for VHF operations, but inappropriate for HF communications because of the need to communicate over long distances. Id. See Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-831A1_Rcd.pdf
  • provided supplemental information on November 10, 2009. See Letter dated November 10, 2009 from Rene Stiegler, President, ShipCom, LLC to Scot Stone, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Supplement). 3Public coast stations are land stations in the maritime mobile service that are open to public correspondence, and render a common carrier service to ship radio stations. See47 C.F.R. � 80.5. 4See Waiver Request at 1. 5See 47 C.F.R. � 80.123introductory paragraph. 6See Waiver Request at 1. 7SeeSupplement at 1. 4894 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-831 marine-originating communications), except for the limit on antenna height of land units.8 4. On January 5, 2010, we sought comment on ShipCom's waiver request.9We received three comments supporting the request.10 5. Discussion.Section 1.925(b)(3) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-359A1.txt
  • standardized by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) that provides vessel information, including the vessel's identity, type, position, course, speed, navigational status and other safety-related information automatically to appropriately equipped shore stations, other ships, and aircraft; receives automatically such information from similarly fitted ships; and exchanges data with shore-based facilities.'' 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. It is used to monitor maritime vessel traffic for both navigational safety and homeland security purposes. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Maritime Automatic Identification Systems, Second Report and Order, WT Docket No. 04-344, 23 FCC Rcd 13711, 13716 � 8 (2008), erratum, 24 FCC Rcd 3241 (2008) (Second Report and Order), recon. pending. The Commission had previously designated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-359A1_Rcd.pdf
  • system standardized by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) that provides vessel information, including the vessel's identity, type, position, course, speed, navigational status and other safety-related information automatically to appropriately equipped shore stations, other ships, and aircraft; receives automatically such information from similarly fitted ships; and exchanges data with shore-based facilities." 47 C.F.R. �80.5. It is used to monitor maritime vessel traffic for both navigational safety and homeland security purposes. 4See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Maritime Automatic Identification Systems, Second Report and Order, WT Docket No. 04-344, 23 FCC Rcd 13711, 13716 � 8 (2008), erratum, 24 FCC Rcd 3241 (2008) (Second Report and Order), recon. pending. The Commission had previously designated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-590A1.txt
  • Honolulu Resident Agent Office, rel. May 29, 2008) (NAL). 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). Section 80.89(a) of the Rules states that ``[s]tations must not: . . . [e]ngage in superfluous radiocommunications.'' 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). An EPIRB station is ``a station in the maritime mobile service the emissions of which are intended to facilitate search and rescue operations.'' 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. A distress alert, such as one from an EPIRB, is considered false ``if it was transmitted without any indication that a mobile unit or person was in distress and required immediate assistance.'' 47 C.F.R. � 80.334. The Rules require that ``[i]f for any reason an EPIRB is activated inadvertently [the licensee shall] immediately contact the nearest U.S. Coast Guard unit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-880A1.txt
  • now incorporated in Section 80.273(a) will be deemed to comply with Section 80.273(c), provided that they meet the other requirements set forth in Section 80.273(c). . Action by the Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- See 47 C.F.R. � 80.273. I.e., vessels not required by treaty or statute to be equipped with radio equipment. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See IEC 62252, ``Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems-Radar for craft not in compliance with IMO SOLAS Chapter V-Performance requirements, methods of test and required test results,'' First edition, 2004-07 (IEC 62252). I.e., vessels required by treaty or statute to be equipped with radio equipment. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. See Amendment of Parts 13 and 80 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 5.5 58,846 57.3 38,192 37.2 1990 105,641 3,216 3.0 56,973 53.9 45,452 43.0 1991 107,389 1,876 1.7 53,450 49.8 52,062 48.5 1992 109,995 717 0.7 48,959 44.5 60,324 54.8 1993 113,368 264 0.2 41,912 37.0 71,192 62.8 1994 117,345 115 0.1 33,191 28.3 84,040 71.6 1995 122,266 63 0.1 29,031 23.7 93,172 76.2 1996 125,846 1 0.0 24,561 19.5 101,283 80.5 1997 131,722 0 0.0 21,219 16.1 110,503 83.9 1998 136,426 0 0.0 16,688 12.2 119,738 87.8 1999 1/ 141,763 0 0.0 11,925 8.4 129,838 91.6 2000 2/ 160,925 0 0.0 7,317 4.5 153,609 95.5 Note: Because of different sources, the data for 1989 and earlier years may not be consistent with the data for 1990 and later years. 1/ Southern
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.txt
  • 45.111 44.41 43.4 Longitude I -117.31 -1081 -81.2 42.3 30.11 31.9 27.8 30.9 32.94 39.94 -73.1 -82.2 -87.5 -97.7 -110 -113.6 -117 ITest points for 90 cm antenna I I I I I t I I Test points for 75 cm antenna Latitude 47.94 50.1 46.9 Longitude -118 -101 -83 ~~ 45.6 44.44 25.7 26.3 26.3 31.76 33.66 -71.9 -69.1 -80.5 -97.8 -99 -114.4 -115.7 Latitude Longitude ILongitude I -71.31 -67.41 -70.51 -78.31 -80.81 -99.71 -1161 -1171 -123.61 -120.81 47.11 46.4 46.4 45.1 43.94 26.9 29.6 26.8 30.44 33.11 -118.3 -93.3 -83.7 -75 -70.6 -81.3 -89.9 -98 -105.3 -115 22 I I I Test points for 1.2 m antenna Latitude 461 44.41 41.8 26.8 25.2 26.7 32.3 32.9 47.9 49.4 Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.txt
  • 45.111 44.41 43.4 Longitude I -117.31 -1081 -81.2 42.3 30.11 31.9 27.8 30.9 32.94 39.94 -73.1 -82.2 -87.5 -97.7 -110 -113.6 -117 ITest points for 90 cm antenna I I I I I t I I Test points for 75 cm antenna Latitude 47.94 50.1 46.9 Longitude -118 -101 -83 ~~ 45.6 44.44 25.7 26.3 26.3 31.76 33.66 -71.9 -69.1 -80.5 -97.8 -99 -114.4 -115.7 Latitude Longitude ILongitude I -71.31 -67.41 -70.51 -78.31 -80.81 -99.71 -1161 -1171 -123.61 -120.81 47.11 46.4 46.4 45.1 43.94 26.9 29.6 26.8 30.44 33.11 -118.3 -93.3 -83.7 -75 -70.6 -81.3 -89.9 -98 -105.3 -115 22 I I I Test points for 1.2 m antenna Latitude 461 44.41 41.8 26.8 25.2 26.7 32.3 32.9 47.9 49.4 Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 201 224 163 317 770 1,079 914 308.0 Guatemala n.a. n.a. n.a. 338 415 423 502 578 894 809 697 64.8 Haiti n.a. n.a. n.a. 311 201 194 195 290 432 816 854 340.2 Hong Kong n.a. n.a. n.a. 275 356 333 208 2,215 1,416 653 31 -90.7 India n.a. n.a. n.a. 690 862 768 955 840 772 867 1,386 80.5 Israel n.a. n.a. n.a. 300 483 635 458 2,915 7,128 1,361 1 -99.8 Italy n.a. n.a. n.a. 177 318 223 346 296 187 41 38 -83.0 Jamaica n.a. n.a. n.a. 374 431 489 460 841 899 1,858 1,540 214.9 Japan n.a. n.a. n.a. 1,393 1,171 1,033 933 1,057 3,100 276 727 -29.6 Korea, Republic of n.a. n.a. n.a. 534 640
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
  • 36.9 25.0 2.4 $2,241,674 29.5 33.0 10.8 22.4 4.2 $757,800 0.2 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 447,151,410 8.4 27.3 42.5 17.4 4.4 Suriname $21,051,387 74.5 0.2 24.4 0.7 0.3 $290,216 33.8 0.0 65.8 0.0 0.4 $4,195 21.0 0.0 79.0 0.0 0.0 50,208,911 53.3 0.3 45.7 0.4 0.4 Uruguay $10,080,040 59.2 4.3 11.5 22.9 2.1 $370,713 51.3 0.0 23.3 22.5 2.9 $16,642 80.5 0.3 5.9 13.3 0.0 55,139,236 54.1 6.8 10.2 26.2 2.6 Venezuela $54,858,538 55.8 4.8 17.7 19.2 2.5 $1,108,742 19.6 4.2 24.1 28.1 24.0 $183,412 0.0 99.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 227,630,560 35.3 15.2 19.0 25.4 5.1 South America $665,780,123 46.9 11.8 19.0 17.9 4.6 $45,401,369 35.4 4.5 35.1 22.8 2.2 $7,828,771 9.1 83.3 5.3 2.3 0.0 4,918,165,553 25.1 23.3 25.6 16.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258044A1.pdf
  • NAL shall be sent by regular mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Scottie E. Kennedy at his record of address. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James C. Hawkins New Orleans Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301 47 U.S.C. � 301. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). 47 C.F.R. � 80.13. 47 C.F.R. �80.13(c). See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.13. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258045A1.pdf
  • NAL shall be sent by regular mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Danny R. McKinney at his record of address. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James C. Hawkins New Orleans Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301 47 U.S.C. � 301. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). 47 C.F.R. � 80.13. 47 C.F.R. �80.13(c). See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.13. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258874A1.pdf
  • or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission authorized by this Act...." See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991). 47 U.S.C. � 301. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.373(f). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 80.13. 47 C.F.R. � 80.13(c). See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.13. 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(4). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, 1.80. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. $ � $ y { } ~ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � $ - `3 @; d �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 2000 2001 2002 2003 Percent Change 1998 to 2003 Australia $1.25 $1.09 $1.01 $0.68 $0.30 $0.42 $0.55 $0.51 $0.38 $0.27 $0.25 -39.9% Brazil 1.06 0.97 0.96 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.57 0.45 0.25 0.22 0.14 -78.8 Canada 0.41 0.36 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.19 0.16 -48.4 China 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 0.18 -80.5 Colombia 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 0.11 -85.2 Dominican Republic 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.16 -64.7 Egypt 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 0.21 -78.8 El Salvador 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60 0.32 0.28 0.13 -84.3 France 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.txt
  • JULY MARCH 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 0.0 NA Hawaii 687,601 99.8 1.00 Idaho 726,447 90.7 1.10 Illinois 7,658,859 95.1 1.05 Indiana 3,620,575 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,608,595 72.5 1.38 Kansas 1,484,063 83.2 1.20 Kentucky 2,086,307 78.2 1.28 Louisiana 2,388,005 92.1 1.09 Maine 849,769 82.4 1.21 Maryland 3,741,166 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,984,705 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,962,539 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,848,843 70.9 1.41 Mississippi 1,376,962 92.9 1.08 Missouri 3,386,695 80.5 1.24 Montana 523,879 66.7 1.50 Nebraska 850,404 78.2 1.28 Nevada 1,314,168 95.5 1.05 New Hampshire 784,265 92.7 1.08 New Jersey 6,327,653 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 967,109 84.8 1.18 New York 11,999,917 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,841,751 89.7 1.11 North Dakota 365,028 51.9 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,047 0.0 NA Ohio 6,659,105 95.0 1.05 Oklahoma 1,826,796 80.8 1.24 Oregon 2,003,956 91.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 0.0 NA Hawaii 687,601 99.8 1.00 Idaho 726,447 90.7 1.10 Illinois 7,658,859 95.1 1.05 Indiana 3,620,575 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,608,595 72.5 1.38 Kansas 1,484,063 83.2 1.20 Kentucky 2,086,307 78.2 1.28 Louisiana 2,388,005 92.1 1.09 Maine 849,769 82.4 1.21 Maryland 3,741,166 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,984,705 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,962,539 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,848,843 70.9 1.41 Mississippi 1,376,962 92.9 1.08 Missouri 3,386,695 80.5 1.24 Montana 523,879 66.7 1.50 Nebraska 850,404 78.2 1.28 Nevada 1,314,168 95.5 1.05 New Hampshire 784,265 92.7 1.08 New Jersey 6,327,653 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 967,109 84.8 1.18 New York 11,999,917 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,841,751 89.7 1.11 North Dakota 365,028 51.9 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,047 0.0 NA Ohio 6,659,105 95.0 1.05 Oklahoma 1,826,796 80.8 1.24 Oregon 2,003,956 91.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • 6 - 29 Table 6.7 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 94.7 98.2 61.3 73.8 87.5 April 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 May 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 June 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 July 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 August 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 September 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 October 79.2 88.4 94.9 92.2 49.7 68.2 80.5 November 79.1 89.0 95.5 94.7 45.6 67.4 77.6 December 77.4 88.2 96.0 92.4 44.5 64.6 74.6 2002January 75.7 86.7 95.4 89.1 43.9 62.7 72.7 February 75.0 85.2 95.8 85.4 42.4 62.8 73.3 March 74.6 84.5 95.6 84.8 40.2 62.8 73.6 April 73.8 83.9 95.3 82.9 41.2 61.9 73.4 May 74.5 83.5 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
  • 8.4 44.2 46.7 $4,911 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 3,100,464 0.0 0.4 33.1 8.7 57.8 Vanuatu $1,253,585 9.7 17.7 0.5 21.2 50.9 $6,342 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $250 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,537,027 0.1 18.9 1.1 2.0 77.9 Wallis and Futuna $22,615 0.0 9.0 70.8 0.0 20.2 $1,583 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 65,133 0.0 6.6 80.5 0.0 12.9 Western Samoa $2,757,092 35.0 2.3 10.5 15.6 36.7 $150,700 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.3 $5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 9,827,052 31.4 2.1 16.6 11.7 38.2 American Samoa $2,749,415 53.3 1.4 20.0 13.3 12.0 $855,889 34.7 0.0 52.1 12.4 0.7 $124 0.0 0.0 99.2 0.0 0.8 15,012,915 27.6 0.8 35.8 12.1 23.8 Baker Island $0 $0 $0 0 Guam
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265356A1.txt
  • NOVEMBER AVERAGE 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265358A1.txt
  • 94.7 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 97.8 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 95.6 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 88.7 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 97.0 91.3 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 98.2 99.3 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.7 $40,000 or more 99.3 99.4 100.0 100.0 99.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 94.7 98.2 61.3 73.8 87.5 April 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 May 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 June 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 July 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 August 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 September 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 October 79.2 88.4 94.9 92.2 49.7 68.2 80.5 November 79.1 89.0 95.5 94.7 45.6 67.4 77.6 December 77.4 88.2 96.0 92.4 44.5 64.6 74.6 2002January 75.7 86.7 95.4 89.1 43.9 62.7 72.7 February 75.0 85.2 95.8 85.4 42.4 62.8 73.3 March 74.6 84.5 95.6 84.8 40.2 62.8 73.6 April 73.8 83.9 95.3 82.9 41.2 61.9 73.4 May 74.5 83.5 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 6 - 32 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
  • 6 - 32 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.txt
  • ANNUAL AVERAGE 22 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272906A1.txt
  • 99.4 99.3 98.0 96.7 96.2 96.5 94.2 95.4 95.2 95.3 96.9 96.9 96.5 94.4 93.6 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 12 Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 88.7 87.3 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 97.0 91.3 95.9 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 98.2 99.3 100.0 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.7 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 6 - 33 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
  • 6 - 33 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279997A1.txt
  • NOVEMBER 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282594A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282594A1.pdf
  • violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'repeated', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day.'' 47 C.F.R. � 80.89(a). 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. 47 C.F.R. � 80.334. 47 C.F.R. � 80.335(e). See 47 C.F.R. �� 87.193 - 87.199. See, e.g., Grant Lam, 22 FCC Rcd 6341 (EB 2007); AMERI-KING Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 2616 (EB 2008); Compatible Electronics, 23 FCC Rcd 2621 (EB 2008). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. �1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(E).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.txt
  • 6.6 8.4 45.2 43.8 CO Connecticut 210.8 84.0 126.8 93.1 33.6 11.6 9.0 7.2 27.8 5.8 CT Delaware 57.7 20.5 37.2 23.3 13.9 5.1 1.6 3.2 9.9 3.8 DE District of Columbia 164.2 26.3 138.0 83.7 54.3 11.8 13.7 24.4 49.9 4.5 DC Florida 1,231.1 621.7 609.4 447.3 162.1 66.0 12.9 24.2 103.1 58.9 FL Georgia 581.4 273.2 308.3 227.8 80.5 34.1 8.1 17.6 59.8 20.6 GA Idaho 56.2 25.6 30.6 14.4 16.4 3.8 1.2 0.2 5.2 11.1 ID Illinois 1,028.2 535.3 493.0 390.5 102.5 39.6 26.2 13.4 79.2 23.0 IL Indiana 442.4 263.5 178.9 131.5 47.4 19.5 6.1 7.5 33.1 14.4 IN Iowa 104.4 29.0 75.3 46.5 28.9 9.3 2.6 1.2 13.1 15.7 IA Kansas 217.4 104.6 112.9 82.4 30.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284923A1.txt
  • JULY 22 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 94.7 98.2 61.3 73.8 87.5 April 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 May 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 June 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 July 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 August 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 September 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 October 79.2 88.4 94.9 92.2 49.7 68.2 80.5 November 79.1 89.0 95.5 94.7 45.6 67.4 77.6 December 77.4 88.2 96.0 92.4 44.5 64.6 74.6 2002January 75.7 86.7 95.4 89.1 43.9 62.7 72.7 February 75.0 85.2 95.8 85.4 42.4 62.8 73.3 March 74.6 84.5 95.6 84.8 40.2 62.8 73.6 April 73.8 83.9 95.3 82.9 41.2 61.9 73.4 May 74.5 83.5 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • - 33 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • - 33 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.txt
  • JULY 23 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291222A1.txt
  • ANNUAL 23 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.txt
  • Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 12 Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 88.7 87.3 96.6 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 97.0 91.3 95.9 96.9 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 98.2 99.3 100.0 99.3 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.7 100.0 98.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292759A1.txt
  • 2009 23 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.txt
  • MARCH 23 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
  • Total Outage Line-Minutes per Thousand Access Lines 1. Scheduled 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,221.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,737.1 3,028.0 2. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 0.0 83.4 0.0 0.0 344.01,234.5 233.0 268.2 3. Proced. Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,599.9 1,168.4 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,080.5 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 0.0 78.3 0.0 0.0 0.02,596.9 0.1 5,422.0 6. Software Design 0 0 759 0 0 0 3476 0 340 7. Hardware design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 0.0 1,963.6 0.0 0.03,672.42,280.0 162,733.0 46,463.4 9. Natural Causes 0.0 0.0 2,491.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9,603.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • - 34 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Outage Line-Minutes per Thousand Access Lines 1. Scheduled 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,221.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,737.1 3,028.0 2. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 0.0 83.4 0.0 0.0 344.0 1,234.5 233.0 268.2 3. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,599.9 1,168.4 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,080.5 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 0.0 78.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,596.9 0.1 5,422.0 6. Software Design 0.0 0.0 758.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,476.1 0.0 339.9 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 0.0 1,963.6 0.0 0.0 3,672.4 2,280.0 162,733.0 46,463.4 9. Natural Causes 0.0 0.0 2,491.2 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
  • Outage Line-Minutes per Thousand Access Lines 1. Scheduled 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,221.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,737.1 3,028.0 2. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Inst./Maint.) 0.0 0.0 83.4 0.0 0.0 344.0 1,234.5 233.0 268.2 3. Procedural Errors -- Telco. (Other) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,599.9 1,168.4 4. Procedural Errors -- System Vendors 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,080.5 0.0 5. Procedural Errors -- Other Vendors 0.0 0.0 78.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,596.9 0.1 5,422.0 6. Software Design 0.0 0.0 758.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,476.1 0.0 339.9 7. Hardware Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 0.0 0.0 1,963.6 0.0 0.0 3,672.4 2,280.0 162,733.0 46,463.4 9. Natural Causes 0.0 0.0 2,491.2 0.0 0.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • - 34 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 63.3 78.4 95.4 97.2 82.7 March 92.1 89.9 63.0 83.5 96.8 97.4 83.3 April 93.5 91.9 62.5 86.0 98.0 96.8 83.3 May 93.5 91.3 65.3 84.3 98.9 98.4 83.6 June 92.3 90.4 64.5 83.5 99.2 96.7 82.5 July 91.9 91.6 64.6 84.9 100.9 91.5 82.1 August 86.0 84.3 63.9 76.3 101.6 90.0 81.1 September 86.5 85.2 63.5 77.6 101.5 88.9 80.5 October 84.9 83.4 63.3 75.5 102.7 88.0 80.2 November 82.2 79.0 62.6 70.4 101.3 90.5 79.3 December 83.7 81.3 62.1 73.5 98.7 89.6 78.7 2009January 82.7 79.9 61.8 71.9 94.5 89.8 78.3 February 81.1 77.6 61.6 69.3 93.5 90.1 77.9 March 80.0 76.2 61.2 67.6 93.8 90.0 77.3 April 79.5 75.9 60.1 67.7 94.3 88.7 76.0 May 78.5 75.3 59.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296121A1.pdf
  • MARCH 23 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.txt
  • 56.2 $3,982,478 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,143,820,295 0.0 0.0 0.7 31.2 68.1 Korea, North $69,361 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.9 76.1 $67 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $208 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 105,785 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 Korea, South $35,011,745 0.0 0.0 0.3 15.9 83.8 $12,199,916 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.4 64.6 $9,253,894 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,023,431,673 0.0 0.0 0.4 19.1 80.5 Laos $1,330,042 0.0 0.0 8.6 21.7 69.7 $235,400 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $161,414 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 29,948,266 0.0 0.0 9.1 18.6 72.3 Macau $814,439 0.0 0.0 1.3 16.6 82.0 $483,321 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 $391,243 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 32,460,355 0.0 0.0 1.2 33.8 65.1 Malaysia $20,389,568 0.0 1.1 0.4 15.2 83.2 $1,151,002 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 91.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297986A1.txt
  • 96.5 94.2 95.4 95.2 95.3 96.9 96.9 96.5 94.4 93.6 95.8 98.1 98.1 * Current dollar equivalents are at the end of Table 4 12 Table 4 Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in March Total Household Income in March 1984 Dollars * 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 88.7 87.3 96.6 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 97.0 91.3 95.9 96.9 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 98.2 99.3 100.0 99.3 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.7 100.0 98.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • 748 84.0 16.0 4,682 Puerto Rico 461 81 85.1 14.9 542 Rhode Island 346 71 83.0 17.0 418 South Carolina 1,250 222 84.9 15.1 1,472 South Dakota 231 39 85.5 14.5 270 Tennessee 1,667 359 82.3 17.7 2,026 Texas 6,869 1,789 79.3 20.7 8,658 Utah 682 169 80.1 19.9 852 Vermont 173 28 86.0 14.0 201 Virgin Islands 27 6 80.5 19.5 33 Virginia 2,624 592 81.6 18.4 3,216 Washington 2,202 510 81.2 18.8 2,712 West Virginia 442 77 85.2 14.8 518 Wisconsin 1,603 272 85.5 14.5 1,874 Wyoming 169 30 84.9 15.1 199 Total 93,920 19,429 82.9 17.1 113,349 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Figures may not sum to totals due to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
  • 191.9 5,779.2 4,320.0 1,459.2 979.7 167.2 300.6 1,447.5 11.7 LA Maine 1,893.1 31.7 1,861.4 1,308.9 552.5 258.4 85.6 190.8 534.8 17.8 ME Maryland 8,998.0 555.9 8,442.0 5,686.6 2,755.5 1,169.5 408.6 1,167.6 2,745.7 9.8 MD Massachusetts 11,727.8 543.6 11,184.2 7,098.8 4,085.4 1,250.9 588.9 2,168.2 4,008.0 77.4 MA Michigan 13,834.4 448.0 13,386.5 10,292.1 3,094.4 1,867.3 649.6 569.3 3,086.2 8.2 MI Minnesota 5,049.3 80.5 4,968.9 3,504.9 1,464.0 714.2 217.0 527.8 1,459.0 5.0 MN Mississippi 4,131.3 57.1 4,074.2 3,013.0 1,061.2 732.5 125.3 193.6 1,051.4 9.8 MS Missouri 8,380.9 183.1 8,197.8 5,785.8 2,412.1 1,303.1 365.7 735.7 2,404.5 7.5 MO Montana 938.8 (6.9) 945.7 632.8 312.9 150.0 68.2 94.1 312.3 0.6 MT Nebraska 2,200.6 33.5 2,167.0 1,469.8 697.2 293.4 172.0 228.3 693.7 3.5 NE Nevada 2,772.4 25.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • by State as of December 31, 2009 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) Connections Percentages State Residential Business Residential Business Total Alabama 1,397 283 83.2 16.8 1,680 Alaska 254 74 77.4 22.6 329 American Samoa * * * * * Arizona 2,303 434 84.1 15.9 2,737 Arkansas 743 194 79.3 20.7 937 California 13,298 3,231 80.5 19.5 16,529 Colorado 1,967 455 81.2 18.8 2,422 Connecticut 1,447 337 81.1 18.9 1,784 Delaware 351 71 83.2 16.8 421 District of Columbia 313 209 60.0 40.0 521 Florida 7,027 1,572 81.7 18.3 8,600 Georgia 3,339 769 81.3 18.7 4,108 Guam 33 6 84.2 15.8 39 Hawaii 560 112 83.3 16.7 672 Idaho 459 97 82.6 17.4 555 Illinois 4,601
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • - 35 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A8.txt
  • - 35 Table 6.10 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 63.3 78.4 95.4 97.2 82.7 March 92.1 89.9 63.0 83.5 96.8 97.4 83.3 April 93.5 91.9 62.5 86.0 98.0 96.8 83.3 May 93.5 91.3 65.3 84.3 98.9 98.4 83.6 June 92.3 90.4 64.5 83.5 99.2 96.7 82.5 July 91.9 91.6 64.6 84.9 100.9 91.5 82.1 August 86.0 84.3 63.9 76.3 101.6 90.0 81.1 September 86.5 85.2 63.5 77.6 101.5 88.9 80.5 October 84.9 83.4 63.3 75.5 102.7 88.0 80.2 November 82.2 79.0 62.6 70.4 101.3 90.5 79.3 December 83.7 81.3 62.1 73.5 98.7 89.6 78.7 2009January 82.7 79.9 61.8 71.9 94.5 89.8 78.3 February 81.1 77.6 61.6 69.3 93.5 90.1 77.9 March 80.0 76.2 61.2 67.6 93.8 90.0 77.3 April 79.5 75.9 60.1 67.7 94.3 88.7 76.0 May 78.5 75.3 59.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306752A1.txt
  • MARCH 23 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308259A1.pdf
  • The only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 98.3 MHz was measured at 1,449 microvolts per meter (�V/m) at 80.5 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 250�V/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. � 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309858A1.pdf
  • 39.4 37.8 4.4 2.2 100.0 N 41 107 188 7 3 346 477 % 43.6 11.7 31.9 53.7 1.8 0.8 100.0 N 5 22 182 16 30 255 562 % 11.1 2.2 9.0 71.0 6.4 11.5 100.0 N 6 32 198 9 6 251 569 % 15.6 2.6 13.0 78.9 3.2 2.3 100.0 85.Where do you work? N % 661 80.5 160 19.5 821 100.0 81.How satisfied are you with the following Work/Life programs in your agency? Health and Wellness Programs (for example, exercise, medical screening, quit smoking programs) 82.How satisfied are you with the following Work/Life programs in your agency? Employee Assistance Program (EAP) 83.How satisfied are you with the following Work/Life programs in your agency? Child Care Programs (for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • M�vil $362,919 27.5% 27.5% 2 AT&T Inc. 321,650 24.4 51.8 3 Verizon Communications Inc. 122,941 9.3 61.1 4 Sprint Nextel Corporation 72,342 5.5 66.6 5 Nexus Communications, Inc. 63,163 4.8 71.4 6 Associated Telecommunications Management Services, LLC 40,079 3.0 74.4 7 Qwest Communications International, Inc. 33,422 2.5 77.0 8 CenturyLink, Inc. 24,333 1.8 78.8 9 Smith Bagley, Inc. 22,874 1.7 80.5 10Frontier Communications Corporation 20,571 1.6 82.1 Other Carriers 236,472 17.9 100.0 All Holding Companies $1,320,765 100.0% 100.0% RankHolding Company Name Lifeline Support Link Up Support TLS Support 1 Am�rica M�vil $362,769 $150 $0 2 AT&T Inc. 309,494 11,798 358 3 Verizon Communications Inc. 121,101 1,789 51 4 Sprint Nextel Corporation 72,342 0 0 5 Nexus Communications, Inc. 45,447 17,693 23
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-300A1.txt
  • the Petition for Forbearance filed by RegioNet Wireless Licenses, LLC on August 31, 1999, IS GRANTED to the extent discussed above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary 47 C.F.R. � 80.102. Petition for Forbearance filed by RegioNet Wireless License, LLC (filed August 31, 1999) (Petition). 47 C.F.R. � 80.102(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 80.102(a)(2). Petition at 1. 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.385(a)(1); Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd 16949, 17004 � 111 (1997) (Maritime Second Report and Order). See Amendment of Parts 2 and 80 of the Commission's Rules Applicable to Automated Maritime Telecommunications Systems (AMTS), First Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 437,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.txt
  • at http://www.attbroadband.com/services/other/Partners.html. TABLE D-6 Top 20 Programming Services by Subscribership Rank Programming Network Number of Subscribers (Millions) MSO Ownership Interest in Network (%) 1 TBS 82.0 AOL Time Warner (100) 2 Discovery Channel 81.7 Liberty Media (49), Cox (24.6) 3 TNT 81.6 AOL Time Warner (100) 4 ESPN 81.0 5 USA Network 81.0 Liberty Media (21) 6 Fox Family Channel 80.5 7 A&E 80.4 8 TNN 80.1 9 Lifetime Television 79.9 10 Nickelodeon/Nick at Nite 79.8 11 CNN 79.7 AOL Time Warner (100) 12 C-SPAN 79.4 13 The Weather Channel 78.9 14 TLC 78.0 Liberty Media (49), Cox (24.6) 15 MTV 77.3 16 QVC 77.0 Comcast (57), Liberty Media (43) 17 CNN Headline News 76.2 AOL Time Warner (100) 18 CNBC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • determinations are consistent with the DTV Sixth Report and Order. There, the Commission specified a minimum geographic separation of 250 km (155 miles) for co-channel operations between DTV stations and the city-center in the areas where there are existing land mobile operations. Section 90.305(a) of our rules provides that full power land mobile base stations can be located up to 80.5 km (50 miles) from the city-center of one of the specified cities. Consequently, under the geographic separation standards adopted in the DTV Sixth Report and Order, a land mobile base station could choose to locate its station as close as 169.5 km (250 km - 80.5 km), or 105 miles to a neighboring DTV station. At this distance, a typical
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.txt
  • continue until one year after the USCG has established Area A1. Suggested Additional Rule Changes In the Notice, the Commission asked for comments on any other rule changes that could be made to update, streamline, or clarify Part 80 of the Commission's Rules. What follows is our discussion of additional rule changes suggested by certain commenters. Subpart A-General Information � 80.5. Section 80.5 of our Rules contains the definitions of terms used throughout Part 80. The Task Force and the USCG recommend that we make the following revisions to Section 80.5: Distress Signal: align with S32.9 of the ITU Radio Regulations, to include a person, and to remove all references to radiotelegraphy. Distress Traffic: align with S32.40 and should include a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1_Erratum.doc
  • continue until one year after the USCG has established Area A1. Suggested Additional Rule Changes In the Notice, the Commission asked for comments on any other rule changes that could be made to update, streamline, or clarify Part 80 of the Commission's Rules. What follows is our discussion of additional rule changes suggested by certain commenters. Subpart A-General Information � 80.5. Section 80.5 of our Rules contains the definitions of terms used throughout Part 80. The Task Force and the USCG recommend that we make the following revisions to Section 80.5: Distress Signal: align with S32.9 of the ITU Radio Regulations, to include a person, and to remove all references to radiotelegraphy. Distress Traffic: align with S32.40 and should include a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • the competitive group, the average number of satellite channels offered increased by 6.9%, from 43.4 to 46.4 and the average rate per satellite channel declined by 0.9%, from 75.1 cents to 74.4 cents. Within the noncompetitive group, satellite channels grew by 6.4%, from 42.1 to 44.8, and the average rate per satellite channel increased by 0.6%, from 80.0 cents to 80.5 cents. The average rate per channel overall (including local and satellite channels) was unchanged and increased by 1.5%, respectively, for the competitive and noncompetitive groups. Table 5. Averages for the Noncompetitive Group, by Service Component July 1, 2000 July 1, 2001 12-month Change Percent Change Basic service tier (BST) $12.62 $12.87 $0.25 2.0% Cable programming service tier (CPST) $18.95 $21.02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-252A1.txt
  • of the baseline of its territorial sea and internal waters as contained in 33 C.F.R. � 2.05-25. See 47 C.F.R. � 81.913(a) (1982) (dividing Mississippi River into upper and lower sections); 47 C.F.R. � 81.913(a) (1985) (dividing Gulf of Mexico into eastern and western sections). Order on Further Reconsideration, 16 FCC Rcd at 19242 � 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5 (Definitions). The referenced rule, 33 C.F.R. � 2.05-25 (Navigable waters of the United States; Navigable Waters; Territorial Waters) is within Part 2 (Jurisdiction) of Chapter I (Coast Guard, Department of Transportation) of Title 33 (Navigation and Navigable Waters) of the Code of Federal Regulations. 33 C.F.R. � 2.05-25(a)(3)(i) (emphasis added). Application for Review at 12. Application for Review at 11
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
  • scenario. USGPSIC Analysis of UWB Indoor Interference to E-911 Indoor System Parameter Value Receiver Susceptibility Mask (dBm/MHz) (Broadband Noise) -111.5 Public Safety Margin (dB) -6 Multiple System Allotment (Excluding MSS) (dB) -3 Single Emitter Allotment -6 GPS Antenna Gain in Direction of RFI Source (dBi) 0 Propagation Loss (dB) (Minimum Distance Separation (meters)) 46 (3) Noise-Like RFI Emission Limit (dBm/MHz) -80.5 47 C.F.R.�15.209 Emission Limit (dBm/MHz) -41.3 Additional Attenuation Required (dB) 39.2 The UWB emission limit recommended in the above table is calculated by adding the values in the columns. As shown in the table, the USGPSIC states that for noise-like interference, UWB signals must be 39 dB below the 47 C.F.R.�15.209 emission limit to protect the GPS receiver under the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-134A1.txt
  • translator relay, and 2 TVPU stations in the 2 GHz BAS band (1990-2110 MHz). Both of the TVPU stations are licensed to Emmiss Television Licensee Corp.: KA95388 is licensed for BAS Channels A1 and A6 (1990-2008 MHz and 2076-2093 MHz) in a 40.2 km radius around Honolulu; and KB55070 is licensed for all 7 BAS channels (1990-2110 MHz) in a 80.5 km radius around Honolulu. Guam Ed Telecommunications Corp. is the only licensee of the 2 GHz BAS band (1990-2110 MHz) on Guam and it has two TVPU stations, both of which are licensed to operate on BAS Channel A4 (2042-2059 MHz). Five of the 11 DOD TT&C earth stations (Anderson AFB, Guam; Buckley Field, CO; Kaena Pt, HI; New Boston,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-143A1.txt
  • 4. At the time Applicants filed their applications, the rule required ``an analysis of the potential for harmful co-channel interference with any authorized or previously proposed station if: (i) [t]he proposed transmitting antenna has an unobstructed electrical path to receive site(s) of any other station(s) that utilize(s), or would utilize, the same frequency, or (ii) [t]he proposed transmitter is within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the coordinates of any such station.'' 47 C.F.R. � 74.903(b)(1) (1995). Clarendon Application, Exhibit E6-1 at 1 (site R16). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 74.903. The receive sites in question are: (1) the site at coordinates 32( 37' 04'' N. Lat., 83( 36' 54'' W. Long. (Baldwin calculated the D/U ratio as 46.6 dB; FCC analysis shows
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.txt
  • Required Co-Channel DTV to DTV Zone I: 198.3 km Zone II & III: 223.7 km DTV to NTSC Zone I: 217.3 km Zone II & III: 244.6 km Adjacent Channel No allotments allowed between: DTV to DTV 24 km and 110 km DTV to NTSC 12 km and 106 km Taboo Channels DTV to NTSC Zone I: 24.1 km and 80.5 km Zone II & III: 24.1 and 96.6 km Notably, in all of the preceding, if one gets an agreement in writing from a station that interference is accepted, then the FCC will permit the applicant station to operate. Yet, NYPD's use of channel 16 in the land mobile service is an aberration, and its standing as an entity whose
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-179A1.txt
  • Rules required HITN to submit as part of its application ``[a]n analysis of the potential for harmful cochannel interference with any authorized or previously proposed station if . . . the proposed transmitting antenna has an unobstructed electrical path to receive site(s) of any other station(s) that utilize(s), or would utilize, the same frequency, or [t]he proposed transmitter is within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the coordinates of any such station.'' HITN was required to submit an interference analysis for Station WLX831 because it was a co-channel station located 29.1 miles from HITN's proposed transmitter site. As an alternative to providing an interference analysis, HITN could have submitted a statement from NCC stating that any resulting interference was acceptable. HITN's application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • operation in these bands subject to the conclusion of appropriate arrangements between the FCC and the Government agencies concerned and upon special showing of need for service which the Federal Government is not yet prepared to render." See Comments of the United States Coast Guard in WT Docket No. 00-48, received August 23, 2000, p. 19. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5 and � 80.1077. GMDSS is the distress and safety system adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). It is designed so that search and rescue authorities will be alerted to a distress incident efficiently and quickly, so that they can assist in a coordinated search and rescue operation with minimal delay. GMDSS also provides maritime safety information to ships; information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
  • of channels required to provide the needed service. (c) (1) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a wireless cable entity may be licensed on EBS frequencies in areas where at least eight other EBS channels remain available in the community for future EBS use. Channels will be considered available for future EBS use if there are no co- channel operators or applicants within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the transmitter site of the proposed wireless cable operation, and if the transmitter site remains available for use at reasonable terms by new EBS applicants on those channels within three years of commencing operation. (2) No more than eight EBS channels per community may be licensed to wireless cable entities. (3) To be licensed on EBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.txt
  • operator from providing both interconnected and non-interconnected services. Consequently, we propose to retain the interconnection requirement for AMTS licensees providing public correspondence service, but amend Section 80.475 to provide that such licensees may also provide non-interconnected service, and that AMTS licensees providing only private mobile radio service need not be interconnected. In this regard, we also propose to revise Section 80.5 to remove ``interconnected'' as a required characteristic of all AMTS operations. Proposals for additional operational flexibility. We note that Maritel proposes additional changes to the service rules governing VPC licensees. Generally, Maritel proposes to permit VPC geographic area licensees to choose whether to provide maritime public correspondence services. In addition, it asserts that Part 80 regulatory obligations, particularly Part 80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.txt
  • The authority citation for Part 80 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 4, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply 48 Stat. 1064-1068, 1081-1105, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151-155, 301-609; 3 UST 3450, 3 UST 4726, 12 UST 2377. 4. Section 80.5 is amended by adding an entry for Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) to read as follows: � 80.5 Definitions. * * * * * Automatic Identification Systems (AIS). A maritime navigation safety communications system standardized by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) that provides vessel information, including the vessel's identity, type, position, course, speed, navigational status and other safety-related information automatically to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.txt
  • to account for the 12 MHz receiver bandwidth consistent with the new BAS channel plan, to -159.2 dBW. The above-calculated RXI's of the DOD TT&C uplink earth station horizon plane interfering signal, with an EIRP of 58 dBW, at distances D of 20, 50, 100, and 200 km, exceed MAXRXI for a BAS ENG TV Pickup receiver by 92.5, 86.5, 80.5, and 72.5 dB, respectively, representing significant worst case interference potentials. Analysis of the SBE data indicates such interference potentials, often in multiple directions, around several of the eleven TT&C sites, due to LOS or near LOS conditions owing to the height of ENG receive antennas with respect to their surroundings, whether on tall buildings or towers in urban areas or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.txt
  • for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, and its Protocol of 1977: Articles, Annexes and Certificates, Incorporating All Amendments in Effect from 1 July 1997, International Maritime Organization, London, 1997. Compulsory ships include all passenger ships that carry more than twelve passengers and all cargo ships of 300 gross tons and over conducting international voyages. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5, Categories of ships (defining a voluntary ship as ``[a]ny ship which is not required by treaty or statute to be equipped with radiotelecommunication equipment''). Amendment of Parts 13 and 80 of the Commission's Rules to Implement the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) to Improve the Safety of Life at Sea, Report and Order, PR Docket No. 90-480, 7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • error 1.3 0.7 1.5 2.0 5.7 6.7 Wireline competition Average 71.2 6.9 78.2 28.8 119.4 148.2 Observations 115 115 115 95 95 95 Standard error 0.9 0.9 1.3 1.8 5.3 5.8 Wireline incumbent Average 71.5 6.1 77.6 29.5 125.2 154.7 Observations 65 65 65 63 63 63 Standard error 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.7 5.4 6.1 Wireline rival Average 69.9 10.5 80.5 25.5 93.8 119.3 Observations 50 50 50 32 32 32 Standard error 1.5 1.4 1.9 2.2 4.5 4.4 DBS competition * Average 67.7 2.1 69.8 31.8 90.3 122.0 Observations 52 52 52 38 38 38 Standard error 2.0 0.4 2.1 2.0 6.7 7.9 Wireless competition * Average 71.2 4.7 75.9 24.5 131.9 156.4 Observations 29 29 29 28 28 28
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • 083� 32' 10'' W Red River, AR.............. 33� 19' 48'' N, 093� 33' 01'' W San Diego, CA.............. 32� 34' 42'' N, 116� 58' 11'' W Silver Lake, MS............ 33� 08' 42'' N, 091� 01' 16'' W US230 The bands 422.1875-425.4875 MHz and 427.1875-429.9875 MHz are allocated to the land mobile service on a primary basis for non-Federal use within 80.5 kilometers (50 miles) of Cleveland, OH (41� 29' 51.2'' N, 81� 41' 49.5'' W) and Detroit, MI (42� 19' 48.1'' N, 83� 02' 56.7'' W). The bands 423.8125-425.4875 MHz and 428.8125-429.9875 MHz are allocated to the land mobile service on a primary basis for non-Federal use within 80.5 kilometers of Buffalo, NY (42� 52' 52.2'' N, 78� 52' 20.1'' W).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.txt
  • The authority citation for Part 80 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 4, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply 48 Stat. 1064-1068, 1081-1105, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151-155, 301-609; 3 UST 3450, 3 UST 4726, 12 UST 2377. 4. Section 80.5 is amended by adding an entry for Automatic Identification Systems (AIS), in the alphabetically appropriate location, to read as follows: � 80.5 Definitions. * * * * * Automatic Identification Systems (AIS). A maritime navigation safety communications system standardized by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) that provides vessel information, including the vessel's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.txt
  • SERVICES The authority citation for Part 80 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 4, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply 48 Stat. 1064-1068, 1081-1105, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151-155, 301-609; 3 UST 3450, 3 UST 4726, 12 UST 2377. Section 80.5 is amended by revising the definition of Digital selective calling (DSC) to read as follows: � 80.5 Definitions. * * * * * Digital selective calling (DSC). A synchronous system developed by the International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication (ITU-R) Sector, used to establish contact with a station or group of stations automatically by means of radio. The operational and technical characteristics
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-126A1.txt
  • the Second Waiver Request because to do otherwise could amount to a de facto denial of the AFR. See Opposition to Second Waiver Request at 2; see also Reply to Opposition to Second Waiver Request at 4 (arguing that it is not essential that the Commission act on the AFR prior to addressing the Second Waiver Request). 47 C.F.R. � 80.5; Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Third Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, PR Docket No. 92-257, 13 FCC Rcd 19853, 19856 � 3 (1998) (Third Report and Order). The nine maritime VPCSA licenses are held by separate wholly-owned subsidiaries of MariTEL. For convenience, we refer to the licensees simply as MariTEL, except when citing to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-141A1.txt
  • Requests at 10. Section 27.1201(c)(1) of the Commission's Rules stated in relevant part that ``a wireless cable entity may be licensed on EBS frequencies in areas where at least eight other EBS channels remain available in the community for future EBS use. Channels will be considered available for future EBS use if there are no co-channel operators or applicants within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the transmitter site of the proposed wireless cable operation and if the transmitter site remains available for use at reasonable terms by new EBS applicants on those channels within three years of commencing operation.'' 47 C.F.R. � 27.1201(c)(1) (2005). See Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the Commission's Rules with Regard to filing Procedures in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-87A1.txt
  • to compete more effectively against other CMRS providers, without jeopardizing vessel safety. It proposed specifically to delete the reference to ``public correspondence'' in Section 80.123; remove the discussion of ``ships'' in Section 80.475(c); amend Section 20.9 to give AMTS geographic area licensees the same flexibility as VPC geographic area licensees to choose between commercial and private services; and amend Sections 80.5 and 80.475 to provide that AMTS stations do not have to be interconnected to the public switched telephone network when they provide PLMR service, but only when offering public correspondence service. In addition to seeking comment on these proposals, the Commission asked interested parties to address how VPC and AMTS stations can technically and practically serve both maritime and land
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-208A1.txt
  • See Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 8907 � 23. Class A AIS devices are those currently certified by the Commission for compliance with international and Coast Guard carriage requirements. Class B AIS devices, which have somewhat reduced functionality vis-�-vis Class A devices, are intended primarily for voluntary carriage by recreational and other non-compulsory vessels. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. For more detailed information on the history of AIS, see Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 8894-8901 �� 4-11. See Amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, Chapter V, Regulation 19.2.4, ``Carriage requirements for shipborne navigational systems and equipment,'' as amended by IMO Resolution MSC.99(73) - 2000 Amendments to the Safety of Life
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.txt
  • opportunity to remove obsolete provisions and correct typographical errors in Part 80. These are non-controversial rule amendments that the Commission may adopt without notice and comment. Specifically, we remove obsolete provisions from Sections 80.205, 80.207, 80.209, and 80.375(d), remove obsolete references to Class A and Class B EPIRBs from Sections 80.15(e), 80.310, and 80.905(a)(3)(iii)(B), update the cross-reference in the Section 80.5 definition of ``navigable waters,'' conform the commercial radio operator license codes referenced in the Part 80 rules to the codes actually used for such licenses in the Commission's Universal Licensing System (ULS) database, and correct typographical errors in Sections 80.5, 80.371, 80.605, 80.373, and 80.1065. We also make minor changes to the Section 80.373(f) listing of frequencies in the 156-162
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-38A1.txt
  • the 70 cm band: (1) No amateur station shall transmit from north of Line A in the 420-430 MHz segment. See � 97.3(a) for the definition of Line A. (2) Amateur stations transmitting in the 420-430 MHz segment must not cause harmful interference to, and must accept interference from, stations authorized by the FCC in the land mobile service within 80.5 km of Buffalo, Cleveland, and Detroit. See � 2.106, footnote US230 for specific frequencies and coordinates. (3) Amateur stations transmitting in the 420-430 MHz segment or the 440-450 MHz segment must not cause harmful interference to, and must accept interference from, stations authorized by other nations in the fixed and mobile except aeronautical mobile services. (n) In the 33 cm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-6A1.txt
  • to serve units on land. Any imbalance that Havens perceives with respect to their construction and coverage requirements is irrelevant to the issue of whether to treat site-based and geographic AMTS licensees consistently in terms of their operational requirements. NUSCO Petition. In 2005, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division granted NUSCO a waiver of Sections 20.9, 80.5, 80.123, and 80.475 of the Commission's Rules to permit it to use AMTS spectrum for PLMR operations in support of its utility services, conditioned on the outcome of this proceeding. NUSCO now seeks clarification that the Report and Order did not affect its operating privileges under this waiver. In the alternative, NUSCO seeks reconsideration of the Report and Order to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-6A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 2003, and Mobex Network Services, LLC, an AMTS licensee, on June 13, 2003, respectively. 10See id. at 15228-29 �� 7-9. 11See id. at 15230 � 10. 12See Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8976-78 �� 8-10. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 20.9, 80.123, 80.475(c). 13See Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcdat 8978 � 11. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.475(d). 534 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-6 allocated frequencies for maritime public correspondence had decreased, partly due to mariners' increased access to cellular, PCS, and satellite services, while demand for PLMR services, including public safety and traditional dispatch services, had increased.14Itfurther noted that many VPC and AMTS geographic licensees are authorized to provide service in areas remote from coasts or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.txt
  • coverage. ). Table C-4 in Appendix C provides a list of the 16 largest facilities-based service providers. Mobile Wireless Network Coverage, Selected Facilities-Based Providers: Voice Networks Service Provider Covered POPs October 2008 (millions) Covered POPs October 2009 (millions) Verizon Wireless 252.9 270.5 AT&T 260.1 262.8 Sprint Nextel 256.6 258.0 T-Mobile 237.6 246.2 Alltel 77.4 -- MetroPCS 56.0 84.6 Leap 53.9 80.5 US Cellular 41.8 41.7 Mobile Wireless Network Coverage, Selected Facilities-Based Providers: Broadband Networks Service Provider Covered POPs November 2008 (millions) Covered POPs November 2009 (millions) Verizon Wireless 241.7 266.7 Sprint Nextel 218.9 226.9 AT&T 189.0 212.3 T-Mobile 88.4 133.9 Alltel 57.7 -- Leap 19.7 79.2 US Cellular 13.1 26.6 Mobile Wireless Subscribers: Selected Facilities-Based Service Providers Service Provider Q4 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Table C-4 in Appendix C provides a list of the 16 largest facilities-based service providers. Table 1 Mobile Wireless Network Coverage, Selected Facilities-Based Providers: Voice Networks54 Service Provider Covered POPs October 2008 (millions) Covered POPs October 2009 (millions) Verizon Wireless 252.9 270.5 AT&T 260.1 262.8 Sprint Nextel 256.6 258.0 T-Mobile 237.6 246.2 Alltel55 77.4 -- MetroPCS 56.0 84.6 Leap 53.9 80.5 US Cellular 41.8 41.7 Table 2 Mobile Wireless Network Coverage, Selected Facilities-Based Providers: Broadband Networks56 Service Provider Covered POPs November 2008 (millions) Covered POPs November 2009 (millions) Verizon Wireless 241.7 266.7 Sprint Nextel 218.9 226.9 AT&T 189.0 212.3 T-Mobile 88.4 133.9 Alltel57 57.7 -- Leap 19.7 79.2 US Cellular 13.1 26.6 53These shares are not necessarily representative of the shares
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • than it costs other carriers to produce theirs,'' and ``provide customers with unlimited wireless services for a flat rate without requiring a fixed-term contract or a credit check.'' Leap, under the brand name Cricket, holds PCS and AWS licenses covering markets throughout much of the country, and has expanded its coverage from approximately 53.9 million POPs in October 2008 to 80.5 million POPs in October 2009, an increase of 26.6 million. In 2010, Leap began offering their customers service plans with nationwide voice roaming, including in Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. As of June 30, 2010, Leap had 5.3 million subscribers, a 16.5 percent increase from June 2009. MetroPCS states that it provides mobile wireless services in ``selected major metropolitan areas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to more than 6.1 million customers in 26 states). 57SeeSection III.E.2, Exit, infra. 9695 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-103 Table 1 Mobile Wireless Network Coverage, Selected Facilities-Based Providers: Voice Networks58 Service Provider Covered POPs October 2009 (millions) Covered POPs October 2010 (millions) Verizon Wireless 270.5 284.9 AT&T 262.8 281.9 Sprint Nextel 258.0 263.2 T-Mobile 246.2 249.5 MetroPCS 84.6 92.1 Leap 80.5 82.7 US Cellular 41.7 41.5 Table 2 Mobile Wireless Network Coverage, Selected Facilities-Based Providers: Broadband Networks59 Service Provider Covered POPs November 2009 (millions) Covered POPs August 2010 (millions) Verizon Wireless 266.7 270.0 Sprint Nextel60 226.9 239.4 AT&T 212.3 228.6 T-Mobile 133.9 183.8 Leap 79.2 81.5 US Cellular 26.6 30.0 31. In addition, subscriber figures for the top service providers are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.txt
  • non-government fixed stations for transmitting hydrological and meteorological data in cooperation with federal agencies. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106 n.US13. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. Under footnote US230 of the Table of Frequency Allocations, non-government land mobile radio services are also permitted to operate on certain frequencies within the 422-430 MHz band, but these operations are limited to areas within 80.5 kilometers (50 miles) of Buffalo, New York; Detroit, Michigan; and Cleveland, Ohio. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.106 n.US230. Under footnote US269, non-Federal pulse-ranging radiolocation systems may be authorized along the shoreline of the conterminous United States and Alaska and non-Federal spread spectrum radiolocation systems may be authorized within the United States and Alaska. These non-Federal radiolocation systems have secondary status.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-80A1.txt
  • No. 2884 (rel. Mar. 26, 2009). MariTEL, Inc., filed comments in support, Reply to Petition for Reconsideration (filed Apr. 17, 2009) (MariTEL Comments), and Motorola, Inc., filed an opposition, Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration (filed by Apr. 20, 2009) (Opposition). PacifiCorp filed a reply. Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration (filed Apr. 30, 2009) (Reply). See 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. For more information regarding AIS, see Second Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 13712-13 �� 2-3. See WRC-97 Final Acts (amending ITU Radio Regulations App. S18). Channel 88B (162.025 MHz) also is designated for AIS use in international waters, but is not at issue herein. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Maritime Automatic Identification Systems, Report and Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-80A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Report No. 2884 (rel. Mar. 26, 2009). MariTEL, Inc., filed comments in support, Reply to Petition for Reconsideration (filed Apr. 17, 2009) (MariTEL Comments), and Motorola, Inc., filed an opposition, Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration (filed by Apr. 20, 2009) (Opposition). PacifiCorp filed a reply. Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration (filed Apr. 30, 2009) (Reply). 3See47 C.F.R. � 80.5. For more information regarding AIS, see Second Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 13712- 13 �� 2-3. 8122 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-80 Channel 87B for AIS use in international waters.4 3.In the Report and Orderin this proceeding, the Commission designated Channel 87B for exclusive AIS use only in the nine maritime VPCSAs.5Because the majority of the commenters favored
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • 1000.0 433.0 40439 325 39077 324 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 7 23 631.8 518.0 38673 315 35708 316 0.0 0.0 99.2 TX AMARILLO 10 9 20.8 466.0 36500 313 33165 304 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 14 15 50.0 464.0 24095 285 23951 285 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX ARLINGTON 68 42 105.6 360.0 14497 3771 17975 3879 0.0 0.0 80.5 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-35 TX AUSTIN 7 56 1000.0 384.0 30828 1245
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
  • determinations are consistent with the DTV Sixth Report and Order. There, the Commission specified a minimum geographic separation of 250 km (155 miles) for co-channel operations between DTV stations and the city-center in the areas where there are existing land mobile operations. Section 90.305(a) of our rules provides that full power land mobile base stations can be located up to 80.5 km (50 miles) from the city-center of one of the specified cities. Consequently, under the geographic separation standards adopted in the DTV Sixth Report and Order, a land mobile base station could choose to locate its station as close as 169.5 km (250 km - 80.5 km), or 105 miles to a neighboring DTV station. At this distance, a typical
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
  • these features confer a greater ability to correct problems and thus decrease the risks associated with such situations. Gilmore provides an engineering statement that indicates that use of channel 25 will meet almost all spacing requirements, with the following exceptions: (1) the DTV-to-NTSC spacing to WLCN-TV, channel 19 is 50.4 km rather than less than 24.1 km or greater than 80.5 km (but WLCN-TV operates at less than full facilities); and (2) the DTV-to- DTV spacing to channel 26, WLKY-TV, Louisville, Kentucy, is 162 km rather than 217.3 km. 433. Cosmos, the licensee of WFIE-TV, NTSC channel 14 in Evansville, Indiana, opposes Gilmore's petition to the extent that it proposes a change in the DTV Table for WFIE- TV to address
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • 1000.0 433.0 40439 325 39077 324 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 7 23 631.8 518.0 38673 315 35708 316 0.0 0.0 99.2 TX AMARILLO 10 9 20.8 466.0 36500 313 33165 304 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 14 15 50.0 464.0 24095 285 23951 285 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX ARLINGTON 68 42 105.6 360.0 14497 3771 17975 3879 0.0 0.0 80.5 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-35 TX AUSTIN 7 56 1000.0 384.0 30828 1245
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98231.pdf
  • receive sites registered as of September 17, 1998, and with the protected service area, of any authorized or previously- proposed cochannel station if: (i) The proposed transmitting antenna has an unobstructed electrical path to receive site(s) and/or the protected service area of any other station that utilizes, or would utilize, the same frequency; or (ii) The proposed transmitter is within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the coordinates of any such station. (2) An analysis of the potential for harmful adjacent channel interference with the receive sites registered as of September 17, 1998, and with the protected service area, of any authorized or previously-proposed station if the proposed transmitter is within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the coordinates of any station that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • 1000.0 433.0 40439 325 39077 324 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 7 23 631.8 518.0 38673 315 35708 316 0.0 0.0 99.2 TX AMARILLO 10 9 20.8 466.0 36500 313 33165 304 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 14 15 50.0 464.0 24095 285 23951 285 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX ARLINGTON 68 42 105.6 360.0 14497 3771 17975 3879 0.0 0.0 80.5 TX AUSTIN 7 56 1000.0 384.0 30828 1245 30089 1269 0.0 0.0 97.1 TX AUSTIN 18 22 66.7 335.0 18312 904 18352 904 4.3 0.8 98.8 TX AUSTIN 24 33 81.4 387.0 22472 997 20626 965 1.7 0.2 100.0 TX AUSTIN 36 21 158.2 374.0 25028 1084 23977 1044 0.1 0.0 99.9 TX AUSTIN 42 43 82.7 393.0 17588 911
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/TV_Notices/pnmm8116.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/TV_Notices/pnmm8116.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/TV_Notices/pnmm8116.wp
  • For this purpose, a "taboo" channel relationship exists where the NTSC station would be 2, 3, 4, 7 or 8 channels below the DTV station channel or the NTSC station would be 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 or 15 channels above the DTV station channel. For such stations, the distances specified for new DTV allotments in Section 73.623(d) are: 80.5 km if either the NTSC or the DTV application site is in TV Zone I; and 96.6 km if neither the NTSC nor the DTV application site is in TV Zone I. DTV Allotment Exchanges Through the application process, broadcasters are permitted to negotiate exchanges of DTV allotments in the same community, same TV market or in adjacent markets, thereby
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
  • Commission noted that in the DTV Sixth Report and Order the Commission specified a minimum geographic separation of 250 kilometers (155 miles) for co-channel operations between DTV stations and the city-center in the areas where there are existing land mobile operations.182 Section 90.305(a) of the Commission's Rules provides that maximum facility land mobile base stations can be located up to 80.5 km (50 mi) from the city-center of one of Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 183 See 47 C.F.R. � 90.305(a). 184 47 C.F.R. � 90.545. 185 See para. 92, supra. 186 See Public Safety Spectrum Second Notice, 12 FCC Rcd at 17802-04 (paras. 232-239). The TV Grade B service contour is where the D/U signal ratio is applied. Thus, to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.wp
  • 861 (1985) (UHF-TV Sharing NPRM). 387 See UHF-TV Sharing NPRM, 101 FCC 2d at 862. 388 See Sixth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 14,588. 67 against potential land mobile interference to and from TV stations, the Commission established land mobile/TV sharing criteria.380 Under the criteria adopted for the 470-512 MHz band, land mobile base stations must be located within 80.5 km (50 mi) of the geographic centers of these eleven cities.381 Land mobile base stations also must meet certain geographic separation requirements from co-channel and adjacent channel TV stations.382 For co-channel operations, the geographic separations are based upon providing a signal ratio of at least 50 dB383 between the desired TV signal and undesired co-channel land mobile signal (D/U signal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1597A1.html
  • address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 301. 2Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200532620003 (Enf. Bur., New Orleans Office, April 6, 2005) (``NAL''). 347 U.S.C. 503(b). 447 C.F.R. 1.80. 547 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D). 6See 47 C.F.R. 80.373(f). 747 C.F.R. 80.13. 847 C.F.R. 80.13(c). 9See 47 C.F.R. 80.5, 80.13. 10Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2365A1.html
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 301. 2Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200532700008 (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, May 9, 2005) (``NAL''). 347 U.S.C. 503(b). 447 C.F.R. 1.80. 547 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D). 647 U.S.C. 301. 7See 47 C.F.R. 80.373(f). 8Id. 947 C.F.R. 80.13. 1047 C.F.R. 80.13(c). 11See 47 C.F.R. 80.5, 80.13. 12See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991). 13Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-438A1.html
  • 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200832860001 (Enf. Bur., Western Region, Honolulu Resident Agent Office, released May 29, 2008). 47 C.F.R.. S: 80.89(a). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.5. 47 C.F.R. S: 80.334. 47 C.F.R. S: 80.335(e). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 87.193 - 87.199. See, e.g., Grant Lam, 22 FCC Rcd 6341 (EB 2007); AMERI-KING Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 2616 (EB 2008); Compatible Electronics, 23 FCC Rcd 2621 (EB 2008). NAL at para. 5. Mens rea is defined "[a]s an element of criminal responsibility: a guilty mind; a guilty
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-590A1.html
  • Honolulu Resident Agent Office, rel. May 29, 2008) (NAL). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). Section 80.89(a) of the Rules states that "[s]tations must not: . . . [e]ngage in superfluous radiocommunications." 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). An EPIRB station is "a station in the maritime mobile service the emissions of which are intended to facilitate search and rescue operations." 47 C.F.R. S: 80.5. A distress alert, such as one from an EPIRB, is considered false "if it was transmitted without any indication that a mobile unit or person was in distress and required immediate assistance." 47 C.F.R. S: 80.334. The Rules require that "[i]f for any reason an EPIRB is activated inadvertently [the licensee shall] immediately contact the nearest U.S. Coast Guard unit
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
  • 85.0 Nov-98194 15 10 9 31.0 n/a 84.0 Mar-00190 15 8 10 31.656.783.7 Mar-01190 13 7 9 38.065.289.1 Danbury CT Mar-96191 6 3 4 46.5n/a 95.8 Nov-97191 6 2 5 51.4n/a100.0 Nov-98192 6 2 5 52.7 n/a 100.0 Mar-00189 7 2 5 52.5100.0n/a Mar-01191 7 2 5 52.4100.0n/a Morgantown-Clarksburg-Fairmont Mar-96178 20 9 9 26.5n/a 63.3 Nov-97179 21 10 10 56.6n/a 80.5 Nov-98184 21 11 10 67.9 n/a 86.6 Mar-00187 22 10 10 63.575.585.1 Mar-01192 22 9 10 62.276.191.0 Terre Haute IN Mar-96180 21 14 9 35.1 n/a 79.3 Nov-97183 23 15 11 35.1n/a 73.0 Nov-98187 22 12 11 36.7 n/a 75.3 Mar-00192 22 11 10 40.655.378.6 Mar-01193 23 11 11 35.855.079.1 Yakima WA Mar-96186 17 7 8 34.4n/a 89.4 Nov-97187 17
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/r950230c.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/r950230c.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/r950230c.wp
  • power. * * * * * (c)(1) An increase in station transmitter power, above currently-authorized or previously proposed values, to the maximum values provided in subsections (a) and (b) of this section, may be authorized, if the requested power increase would not cause harmful interference to any authorized or previously proposed co-channel or adjacent-channel station with a transmitter site within 80.5 kilometers (50 miles) of the applicant's transmitter site, or if an applicant demonstrates that: (i) A station, that must be protected from interference, potentially could suffer interference that would be eliminated by increasing the power of the interfered-with station; and (ii) The applicant requesting authorization of a power increase agrees to pay all expenses associated with the increase in power
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.wp
  • station license to be posted at the principal control point of the station. At the request of the 140 Coast Guard, we proposed to permit vessel owners to alternatively keep the license anywhere on board, so long as it is available upon request. Both the Coast Guard and RTCM support this proposal.141 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-217 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. 142 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. 143 See 47 C.F.R. Part 80 subpart K. 144 Further Notice, 10 FCC Rcd at 5734. 145 ACBL/WATERCOM Comments at 10; RTCM Comments at 9. 146 ACBL/WATERCOM Comments at 10. 147 33 57. Decision. Small commercial vessels and recreational vessels often do not have an enclosed pilot house, and thus, the station license may be
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.wp
  • 47 C.F.R. � 90.816(b)(1)(i). Second Further Notice, 12 FCC Rcd at 16994-95. 104 MariTEL Comments at 9; MMR Comments at 10; see also ITA/CICS Comments at 10. "Navigable waters" are the territorial waters 105 of the United States, and its internal waters that are or have been susceptible for use as highways for interstate or foreign commerce. 47 C.F.R. � 80.5. MMR proposes requiring service to the region's navigable waterways within one year. MMR Comments at 10. MariTEL proposes 106 that geographic area licensees be required to construct at least ten percent of their authorized channels along eighty percent of the region's navigable waterways within one year of authorization, and fifty percent of the channels along eighty percent of the waterways
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_g.pdf
  • MHz interfering contour. For paging stations transmitting on the 931 MHz channels, the interfering contour is a circle, centered on the transmitting antenna, with a radius determined from Table E-2 of this section. TABLE E-2. - 931 MHz PAGING INTERFERING RADII Interfering radius km (miles) Effective radiated power (Watts) Antenna HAAT meters (feet) 0-125 126-250 251-500 501-1000 1001-1860 1861-3500 0-177............................. 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) (0-581) 178-305........................... 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) 88.5 (55) 96.6 (60) (582-1001) 306-427........................... 80.5 (50) 80.5 (50) 88.5 (55) 96.6 (60) 130.4 (81) 130.4 (81) (1002-1401) 428-610........................... 80.5 (50) 88.5 (55) 96.6 (60) 130.4 (81) 130.4 (81) 130.4 (81) (1402-2001) 611-861........................... 88.5 (55) 96.6 (60) 96.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0610_tables.doc
  • 5.3 Alaska 87.2 77.9 28.9 12.7 6.5 American Samoa * * * * * Arizona 88.7 71.9 36.1 32.7 23.4 Arkansas 89.7 76.1 26.5 17.0 14.8 California 87.9 75.1 32.7 25.6 17.0 Colorado 89.6 76.0 38.1 35.3 25.9 Connecticut 89.4 76.2 38.9 33.5 24.5 Delaware 87.2 73.3 51.2 46.2 42.5 District of Columbia 77.7 59.8 32.4 25.0 16.8 Florida 88.2 80.5 43.4 34.7 21.2 Georgia 86.0 74.4 37.5 25.5 16.5 Guam * * * * * Hawaii 94.0 85.0 52.1 7.9 1.0 Idaho 86.2 69.9 34.2 11.4 3.2 Illinois 89.8 78.0 37.1 26.7 18.5 Indiana 87.0 73.7 35.7 25.9 20.2 Iowa 89.5 75.4 50.0 27.8 7.0 Kansas 86.4 74.4 36.9 25.9 16.4 Kentucky 87.2 78.7 41.9 26.0 20.8 Louisiana 88.0 80.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0611_tables.doc
  • Alaska 432 66 86.8 13.2 498 American Samoa * * * * * Arizona 3,427 520 86.8 13.2 3,947 Arkansas 1,481 200 88.1 11.9 1,681 California 21,782 4,247 83.7 16.3 26,029 Colorado 3,103 611 83.6 16.4 3,713 Connecticut 2,228 402 84.7 15.3 2,630 Delaware 547 90 85.9 14.1 638 District of Columbia 524 470 52.7 47.3 995 Florida 10,245 2,475 80.5 19.5 12,720 Georgia 5,221 1,195 81.4 18.6 6,417 Guam 62 13 82.5 17.5 76 Hawaii 861 123 87.5 12.5 984 Idaho 772 140 84.6 15.4 912 Illinois 7,126 1,519 82.4 17.6 8,645 Indiana 3,244 526 86.0 14.0 3,770 Iowa 1,398 227 86.0 14.0 1,625 Kansas 1,476 462 76.1 23.9 1,938 Kentucky 2,079 360 85.2 14.8 2,439 Louisiana 2,537 396 86.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1209_tables.doc
  • 9.4 Alaska 82.2 70.3 25.7 11.7 3.4 American Samoa * * * * * Arizona 87.6 72.8 39.2 35.6 27.4 Arkansas 88.4 75.7 28.8 18.6 12.6 California 88.4 76.7 33.5 23.8 16.1 Colorado 89.0 76.3 40.4 36.6 10.5 Connecticut 88.6 77.5 40.0 31.4 29.5 Delaware 85.6 73.6 54.8 47.0 40.2 District of Columbia 70.0 42.5 32.0 20.4 18.7 Florida 87.4 80.5 44.1 34.2 23.5 Georgia 84.2 74.7 38.6 21.2 16.3 Guam * * * * * Hawaii 93.0 85.1 53.9 4.5 1.1 Idaho 85.0 63.4 37.3 10.4 2.8 Illinois 88.7 77.0 37.5 25.1 21.2 Indiana 85.6 73.9 38.0 27.2 22.3 Iowa 89.1 76.8 51.0 28.9 7.0 Kansas 85.5 75.4 37.2 27.4 17.3 Kentucky 87.3 79.3 45.2 27.6 25.2 Louisiana 87.1 80.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
  • Montana 66.9 14.9 1.4 16.9 74 67.7 16.1 0.0 16.1 31 80.8 11.5 1.9 5.8 52 Nebraska 67.1 14.7 4.2 14.0 143 71.2 17.3 1.9 9.6 52 73.6 13.9 1.4 11.1 72 Nevada 64.2 6.4 14.7 14.7 109 66.0 16.0 16.0 2.0 50 67.5 15.0 10.0 7.5 40 New Hampshire 76.5 9.1 3.8 10.6 66 77.5 10.0 10.0 2.5 40 80.5 7.3 7.3 4.9 41 New Jersey 74.9 11.3 4.5 9.3 462 77.5 11.9 5.6 5.0 160 84.2 10.4 1.0 4.5 202 New Mexico 61.8 13.7 6.9 17.6 102 64.9 10.5 7.0 17.5 57 78.7 11.5 4.9 4.9 61 New York 71.7 11.9 5.1 11.3 1,079 69.4 15.4 3.7 11.5 461 78.3 11.9 4.1 5.7 663 North Carolina 69.8 4.7 9.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
  • Montana 66.9 14.9 1.4 16.9 74 67.7 16.1 0.0 16.1 31 80.8 11.5 1.9 5.8 52 Nebraska 67.1 14.7 4.2 14.0 143 71.2 17.3 1.9 9.6 52 73.6 13.9 1.4 11.1 72 Nevada 64.2 6.4 14.7 14.7 109 66.0 16.0 16.0 2.0 50 67.5 15.0 10.0 7.5 40 New Hampshire 76.5 9.1 3.8 10.6 66 77.5 10.0 10.0 2.5 40 80.5 7.3 7.3 4.9 41 New Jersey 74.9 11.3 4.5 9.3 462 77.5 11.9 5.6 5.0 160 84.2 10.4 1.0 4.5 202 New Mexico 61.8 13.7 6.9 17.6 102 64.9 10.5 7.0 17.5 57 78.7 11.5 4.9 4.9 61 New York 71.7 11.9 5.1 11.3 1,079 69.4 15.4 3.7 11.5 461 78.3 11.9 4.1 5.7 663 North Carolina 69.8 4.7 9.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris00.pdf
  • 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.3 99.4 100.0 100.0 99.5 99.4 99.3 100.0 99.5 All Households 94.7 94.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris01.pdf
  • 90.4 93.1 94.2 90.4 93.9 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 $40,000 or more 99.3 99.4 100.0 100.0 99.5 99.4 99.3 100.0 99.5 All Households 94.7 94.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris02.pdf
  • 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 97.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 98.2 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.3 99.4 100.0 100.0 99.5 99.4 99.3 100.0 99.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • 96.6 97.1 93.0 94.5 95.5 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 97.0 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 98.2 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 100.0 $40,000 or more 99.3 99.4 100.0 100.0 99.5 99.4 99.3 100.0 99.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • 94.7 $20,000 - $29,999 97.8 98.0 96.3 95.1 98.4 97.5 95.1 98.9 96.0 97.5 95.8 $30,000 - $39,999 98.6 99.3 98.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 98.3 $40,000 or more 99.6 97.6 97.6 97.5 100.0 99.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.3 97.8 All Households 94.6 96.2 94.8 93.0 94.9 96.2 94.8 94.0 95.4 96.5 95.6 Connecticut $9,999 or less 80.5 71.4 91.7 92.5 91.4 86.9 88.6 85.6 85.5 89.1 88.7 $10,000 - $19,999 93.5 94.8 97.2 95.6 91.0 98.0 95.8 98.2 95.7 97.0 91.3 $20,000 - $29,999 97.0 99.0 97.6 97.8 96.0 98.3 100.0 98.3 100.0 98.2 99.3 $30,000 - $39,999 99.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.7 100.0 98.9 100.0 98.7 $40,000 or more 99.3 99.4 100.0 100.0 99.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 94.7 98.2 61.3 73.8 87.5 100.0 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 100.0 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 100.0 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 100.0 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 100.0 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 100.0 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 100.0 78.9 87.9 94.5 98.9 50.0 68.1 80.5 100.0 79.0 88.8 94.8 90.9 45.9 67.3 77.5 100.0 78.0 87.5 95.0 94.8 43.9 66.7 77.0 73 Table 3.4 Producer Price Indices - Continued (June 1995 = 100) BLS Series ID 1995 June July August September October November December 1996 January February March April May June July August September October November December 1997 January February March April May June July
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 May 100.0 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 June 100.0 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 July 100.0 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 August 100.0 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 September 100.0 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 October 100.0 79.2 88.4 94.9 92.2 49.7 68.2 80.5 November 100.0 79.1 89.0 95.5 94.7 45.6 67.4 77.6 December 100.0 77.4 88.2 96.0 92.4 44.5 64.6 74.6 2002January 100.0 75.7 86.7 95.4 89.1 43.9 62.7 72.7 February 100.0 75.0 85.2 95.8 85.4 42.4 62.8 73.3 March 100.0 74.6 84.5 95.6 84.8 40.2 62.8 73.6 April 100.0 73.8 83.9 95.3 82.9 41.2 61.9 73.4 May 100.0 74.5 83.5 95.3 82.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 94.7 98.2 61.3 73.8 87.5 April 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 May 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 June 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 July 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 August 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 September 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 October 79.2 88.4 94.9 92.2 49.7 68.2 80.5 November 79.1 89.0 95.5 94.7 45.6 67.4 77.6 December 77.4 88.2 96.0 92.4 44.5 64.6 74.6 2002January 75.7 86.7 95.4 89.1 43.9 62.7 72.7 February 75.0 85.2 95.8 85.4 42.4 62.8 73.3 March 74.6 84.5 95.6 84.8 40.2 62.8 73.6 April 73.8 83.9 95.3 82.9 41.2 61.9 73.4 May 74.5 83.5 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 94.7 98.2 61.3 73.8 87.5 April 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 May 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 June 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 July 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 August 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 September 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 October 79.2 88.4 94.9 92.2 49.7 68.2 80.5 November 79.1 89.0 95.5 94.7 45.6 67.4 77.6 December 77.4 88.2 96.0 92.4 44.5 64.6 74.6 2002January 75.7 86.7 95.4 89.1 43.9 62.7 72.7 February 75.0 85.2 95.8 85.4 42.4 62.8 73.3 March 74.6 84.5 95.6 84.8 40.2 62.8 73.6 April 73.8 83.9 95.3 82.9 41.2 61.9 73.4 May 74.5 83.5 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • $3,388.0 1970 52.8 59.0 63.9 1,304 8.04% $3,388.2 1971 55.7 65.5 65.8 1,372 7.39% $3,500.1 1972 58.5 66.0 66.0 1,520 7.21% $3,690.3 1973 60.2 68.2 68.0 1,639 7.44% $3,902.3 1974 63.7 71.0 68.0 1,762 8.57% $3,888.2 1975 66.3 75.0 73.8 2,199 8.83% $3,865.1 1976 69.6 82.8 78.6 2,506 8.43% $4,081.1 1977 69.8 87.0 79.6 2,837 8.02% $4,279.3 1978 71.5 87.1 80.5 3,266 8.73% $4,493.7 1979 72.2 86.8 79.8 3,664 9.63% $4,624.0 1980 74.9 87.3 82.3 3,891 11.94% $4,611.9 1981 84.3 91.1 90.8 4,189 14.17% $4,724.9 1982 94.0 96.1 100.4 4,430 13.79% $4,623.6 1983 99.3 100.3 101.3 4,757 12.04% $4,810.0 1984 106.8 103.6 98.3 5,765 12.71% $5,138.2 1985 118.5 106.9 94.7 6,702 11.37% $5,329.5 1986 130.8 104.2 87.9 7,199 9.02% $5,489.9 1987
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 96.0 September 82.4 76.9 82.8 68.5 83.2 92.3 86.6 October 83.2 77.9 81.2 72.4 81.7 92.7 88.4 November 83.8 77.8 85.5 72.0 82.1 94.6 80.3 December 81.3 76.8 86.0 69.3 79.3 89.5 79.1 1998January 81.7 75.9 83.4 69.0 82.3 92.2 71.7 February 80.6 73.2 79.7 65.7 82.6 93.9 73.6 (PRELIM) March 83.7 79.1 86.3 71.6 88.0 91.9 68.4 (PRELIM) April 80.5 75.0 79.2 71.1 80.5 90.2 74.2 (PRELIM) May 77.5 73.5 82.7 68.1 78.7 84.8 74.2 (PRELIM) June 79.0 72.9 76.3 66.9 81.0 89.9 74.2 Producer Price Indices are subject to revision four months after release 83 Table 4.4 Producer Price Indices (June 1997 = 100) Interstate Business Special Access Switched Toll Service, Inbound International Business Special Access Switched Toll Service,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 113.6 105.1 136.0 June 76.7 123.0 122.5 127.5 117.7 124.2 123.1 131.5 120.8 83.3 113.6 105.1 136.0 July 77.5 123.0 122.5 127.5 117.7 124.2 123.1 131.5 120.8 83.3 113.6 105.1 136.0 August 78.0 123.3 122.8 127.8 117.7 124.2 123.1 131.5 120.8 82.7 114.3 105.1 138.5 September 79.2 123.9 123.5 128.8 117.7 124.2 123.1 131.5 120.8 82.7 114.3 105.1 138.5 October 80.5 124.4 124.0 129.5 117.7 124.3 123.4 131.5 120.8 91.4 114.3 105.1 138.5 November 81.2 124.4 124.0 129.5 117.7 124.3 123.3 131.2 120.8 91.4 114.3 105.1 138.5 December 82.0 126.1 126.2 131.6 117.7 124.5 123.3 131.2 120.8 91.4 114.4 105.1 139.0 1980January 83.5 125.3 125.3 130.4 117.7 124.5 123.4 131.5 120.8 90.9 114.4 105.1 139.0 February 84.7 125.4 125.3 130.4 117.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0300.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0301.pdf
  • 95.1 MARCH 20 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0302.pdf
  • AVERAGE MARCH 20 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0303.pdf
  • ANNUAL AVERAGE 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0304.pdf
  • AVERAGE MARCH 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0305.pdf
  • 95.4 MARCH 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0398.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0399.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0700.pdf
  • NOVEMBER 20 TABLE 4 - PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0701.pdf
  • JULY MARCH 20 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0702.pdf
  • AVERAGE MARCH 20 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0703.pdf
  • ANNUAL AVERAGE 20 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0704.pdf
  • AVERAGE MARCH 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0798.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0799.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1100.pdf
  • AVERAGE JULY 20 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1101.pdf
  • JULY MARCH 20 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1102.pdf
  • ANNUAL AVERAGE 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1103.pdf
  • NOVEMBER AVERAGE 21 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1104.pdf
  • AVERAGE JULY 20 Table 4 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1196.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1198.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1199.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.2 2.0 1.6 3.5 2.0 2.3 1.8 2.2 Sprint 3.5 4.6 3.8 3.3 4.5 3.6 3.2 4.5 3.5 Oklahoma 2,018 SBC 33.6 45.9 37.4 31.1 41.7 34.4 29.3 39.8 32.6 Oregon 2,079 GTE 50.3 64.8 54.6 28.3 33.4 29.8 2.5 1.9 2.3 U S WEST 37.9 55.1 43.4 37.4 55.4 43.1 37.5 55.2 42.9 Pennsylvania 8,212 Bell Atlantic 76.4 88.2 80.5 44.2 63.1 50.9 39.2 59.1 46.2 Frontier * * * GTE 5.7 10.8 7.1 5.8 12.3 7.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 Sprint 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rhode Island 661 Bell Atlantic 81.2 85.9 82.7 44.1 52.7 46.9 44.7 54.2 47.5 South Carolina 2,248 BellSouth 28.7 44.6 33.7 13.1 29.2 18.1 13.2 29.6 18.2 Sprint 0.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 5.5 58,846 57.3 38,192 37.2 1990 105,641 3,216 3.0 56,973 53.9 45,452 43.0 1991 107,387 1,876 1.7 53,450 49.8 52,061 48.5 1992 109,994 717 0.7 48,952 44.5 60,325 54.8 1993 113,368 264 0.2 41,912 37.0 71,192 62.8 1994 117,313 115 0.1 33,191 28.3 84,007 71.6 1995 122,229 63 0.1 29,031 23.8 93,135 76.2 1996 125,843 1 0.0 24,559 19.5 101,283 80.5 1997 131,721 0 0.0 21,217 16.1 110,504 83.9 SOURCES: 1980-89 REPORTED IN CC DOCKET 89-624. 1990-97 REPORTED IN ARMIS 43-07. BECAUSE OF THE DIFFERING SOURCES, THE DATA FOR 1989 AND EARLIER YEARS MAY NOT BE ENTIRELY CONSISTENT WITH THE DATA FOR 1990 AND LATER YEARS. 18 - 3 TABLE 18.2 FEATURES AVAILABLE IN CENTRAL OFFICES (BELL OPERATING COMPANIES) YEAR-END TOTAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 5.5 58,846 57.3 38,192 37.2 1990 105,641 3,216 3.0 56,973 53.9 45,452 43.0 1991 107,389 1,876 1.7 53,450 49.8 52,062 48.5 1992 109,995 717 0.7 48,959 44.5 60,324 54.8 1993 113,368 264 0.2 41,912 37.0 71,192 62.8 1994 117,345 115 0.1 33,191 28.3 84,040 71.6 1995 122,266 63 0.1 29,031 23.7 93,172 76.2 1996 125,846 1 0.0 24,561 19.5 101,283 80.5 1997 131,722 0 0.0 21,219 16.1 110,503 83.9 1998 136,426 0 0.0 16,688 12.2 119,738 87.8 1999 139,349 0 0.0 11,713 8.4 127,636 91.6 Sources: 1980-89 reported in CC Docket 89-624. 1990-99 reported in ARMIS 43-07. Note: Because of different sources, the data for 1989 and earlier years may not be consistent with the data for 1990 and later years.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 5.5 58,846 57.3 38,192 37.2 1990 105,641 3,216 3.0 56,973 53.9 45,452 43.0 1991 107,387 1,876 1.7 53,450 49.8 52,061 48.5 1992 109,994 717 0.7 48,952 44.5 60,325 54.8 1993 113,369 264 0.2 41,912 37.0 71,193 62.8 1994 117,313 115 0.1 33,191 28.3 84,007 71.6 1995 122,229 63 0.1 29,031 23.8 93,135 76.2 1996 125,843 1 0.0 24,559 19.5 101,283 80.5 1997* 131,721 0 0.0 21,218 16.1 110,503 83.9 SOURCE: 1980-89 REPORTED IN CC DOCKET 89-624. 1990-97 REPORTED IN ARMIS 43-07. BECAUSE OF THE DIFFERING SOURCES, THE DATA FOR 1989 AND EARLIER YEARS MAY NOT BE ENTIRELY CONSISTENT WITH THE DATA FOR 1990 AND LATER YEARS. * PRELIMINARY. 89 TABLE 17.2 FEATURES AVAILABLE IN CENTRAL OFFICES (BELL OPERATING COMPANIES) YEAR-END TOTAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 5.5 58,846 57.3 38,192 37.2 1990 105,641 3,216 3.0 56,973 53.9 45,452 43.0 1991 107,389 1,876 1.7 53,450 49.8 52,062 48.5 1992 109,995 717 0.7 48,959 44.5 60,324 54.8 1993 113,368 264 0.2 41,912 37.0 71,192 62.8 1994 117,345 115 0.1 33,191 28.3 84,040 71.6 1995 122,266 63 0.1 29,031 23.7 93,172 76.2 1996 125,846 1 0.0 24,561 19.5 101,283 80.5 1997 131,722 0 0.0 21,219 16.1 110,503 83.9 1998 136,426 0 0.0 16,688 12.2 119,738 87.8 Sources: 1980-89 reported in CC Docket 89-624. 1990-98 reported in ARMIS 43-07. Because of the differing sources, the data for 1989 and earlier years may not be consistent with the data for 1990 and later years. 18 - 3 TABLE 18.2 FEATURES AVAILABLE IN
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 5.5 58,846 57.3 38,192 37.2 1990 105,641 3,216 3.0 56,973 53.9 45,452 43.0 1991 107,389 1,876 1.7 53,450 49.8 52,062 48.5 1992 109,995 717 0.7 48,959 44.5 60,324 54.8 1993 113,368 264 0.2 41,912 37.0 71,192 62.8 1994 117,345 115 0.1 33,191 28.3 84,040 71.6 1995 122,266 63 0.1 29,031 23.7 93,172 76.2 1996 125,846 1 0.0 24,561 19.5 101,283 80.5 1997 131,722 0 0.0 21,219 16.1 110,503 83.9 1998 136,426 0 0.0 16,688 12.2 119,738 87.8 1999 1/ 141,763 0 0.0 11,925 8.4 129,838 91.6 2000 2/ 160,925 0 0.0 7,317 4.5 153,609 95.5 Note: Because of different sources, the data for 1989 and earlier years may not be consistent with the data for 1990 and later years. 1/ Southern
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
  • Interstate Interstate as % of Total Revenue As Percent of Revenue As Percent of Revenue As Percent of Revenue Total Intrastate Total Interstate Total Carrier in Revenue Revenue Revenue Category Local Exchange Service $35.4 0.2% $4.7 0.4% $40.2 0.2% 11.8% Local Private Line Service $11.4 0.1 $2.2 0.2 $13.5 0.1 15.9 Cellular, PCS, Paging & Other Mobile $22,373.4 98.9 $935.9 80.5 $23,309.2 98.0 4.0 Other Local $11.6 0.1 $1.9 0.2 $13.5 0.1 13.9 Total Local Revenues $22,431.8 99.1 $944.6 81.2 $23,376.4 98.3 4.0 Interstate Access $0.0 0.0 $19.0 1.6 $19.0 0.1 100.0 Intrastate Access $45.0 0.2 $0.0 0.0 $45.0 0.2 0.0 Total Access Revenues $45.0 0.2 $19.0 1.6 $64.0 0.3 29.7 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card $0.0 0.0 $0.0 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
  • 36.9 25.0 2.4 $2,241,674 29.5 33.0 10.8 22.4 4.2 $757,800 0.2 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 447,151,410 8.4 27.3 42.5 17.4 4.4 Suriname $21,051,387 74.5 0.2 24.4 0.7 0.3 $290,216 33.8 0.0 65.8 0.0 0.4 $4,195 21.0 0.0 79.0 0.0 0.0 50,208,911 53.3 0.3 45.7 0.4 0.4 Uruguay $10,080,040 59.2 4.3 11.5 22.9 2.1 $370,713 51.3 0.0 23.3 22.5 2.9 $16,642 80.5 0.3 5.9 13.3 0.0 55,139,236 54.1 6.8 10.2 26.2 2.6 Venezuela $54,858,538 55.8 4.8 17.7 19.2 2.5 $1,108,742 19.6 4.2 24.1 28.1 24.0 $183,412 0.0 99.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 227,630,560 35.3 15.2 19.0 25.4 5.1 South America $665,780,123 46.9 11.8 19.0 17.9 4.6 $45,401,369 35.4 4.5 35.1 22.8 2.2 $7,828,771 9.1 83.3 5.3 2.3 0.0 4,918,165,553 25.1 23.3 25.6 16.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 201 224 163 317 770 1,079 914 308.0 Guatemala n.a. n.a. n.a. 338 415 423 502 578 894 809 697 64.8 Haiti n.a. n.a. n.a. 311 201 194 195 290 432 816 854 340.2 Hong Kong n.a. n.a. n.a. 275 356 333 208 2,215 1,416 653 31 -90.7 India n.a. n.a. n.a. 690 862 768 955 840 772 867 1,386 80.5 Israel n.a. n.a. n.a. 300 483 635 458 2,915 7,128 1,361 1 -99.8 Italy n.a. n.a. n.a. 177 318 223 346 296 187 41 38 -83.0 Jamaica n.a. n.a. n.a. 374 431 489 460 841 899 1,858 1,540 214.9 Japan n.a. n.a. n.a. 1,393 1,171 1,033 933 1,057 3,100 276 727 -29.6 Korea, Republic of n.a. n.a. n.a. 534 640
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-6.pdf
  • 6 - 29 Table 6.7 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 May 100.0 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 June 100.0 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 July 100.0 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 August 100.0 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 September 100.0 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 October 100.0 79.2 88.4 94.9 92.2 49.7 68.2 80.5 November 100.0 79.1 89.0 95.5 94.7 45.6 67.4 77.6 December 100.0 77.4 88.2 96.0 92.4 44.5 64.6 74.6 2002January 100.0 75.7 86.7 95.4 89.1 43.9 62.7 72.7 February 100.0 75.0 85.2 95.8 85.4 42.4 62.8 73.3 March 100.0 74.6 84.5 95.6 84.8 40.2 62.8 73.6 April 100.0 73.8 83.9 95.3 82.9 41.2 61.9 73.4 May 100.0 74.5 83.5 95.3 82.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 6 - 29 Table 6.7 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 94.7 98.2 61.3 73.8 87.5 April 83.4 92.1 94.3 98.6 61.3 73.0 87.2 May 83.1 92.2 94.3 98.2 60.4 72.2 85.8 June 82.4 91.4 95.2 98.9 57.4 71.6 84.7 July 81.9 91.3 95.6 96.9 57.9 70.7 84.3 August 82.5 92.8 95.8 96.0 54.8 70.2 83.2 September 82.7 91.7 95.9 101.2 52.9 72.0 84.3 October 79.2 88.4 94.9 92.2 49.7 68.2 80.5 November 79.1 89.0 95.5 94.7 45.6 67.4 77.6 December 77.4 88.2 96.0 92.4 44.5 64.6 74.6 2002January 75.7 86.7 95.4 89.1 43.9 62.7 72.7 February 75.0 85.2 95.8 85.4 42.4 62.8 73.3 March 74.6 84.5 95.6 84.8 40.2 62.8 73.6 April 73.8 83.9 95.3 82.9 41.2 61.9 73.4 May 74.5 83.5 95.3 82.1 40.6 63.7 73.7 June 74.2 83.3 95.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-6.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 102.5 137.3 85.8 86.4 72.9 84.2 67.3 79.7 May 101.6 135.6 86.5 87.3 69.5 85.8 62.3 79.2 June 102.8 132.8 87.0 86.5 70.0 85.0 59.8 78.8 July * 102.1 128.5 86.2 85.8 74.5 82.9 58.2 79.1 August * 103.8 133.2 82.8 85.7 71.0 81.9 68.5 79.2 September * 103.3 137.6 83.5 86.4 74.0 82.6 61.2 78.9 October * 103.8 133.2 80.5 86.2 74.9 82.2 57.3 77.7 * Producer Price Indices are subject to revision four months after release 7 - 15 Table 7.6 Producer Price Indices (June 1995 =100) Outbound Business Special Access Switched Toll Service Intrastate Business Special Access Switched Toll Service, Outbound Interstate Business Special Access Switched Toll Service, Outbound International Business Special Access Switched Toll Service, Outbound Inbound
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • 223.4 322.4 102.8 281.3 226.9 For Unscheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 42 20 102 44 15 187 85 227 55 Events per Hundred Switches 2.9 1.4 6.2 3.4 1.9 11.1 5.9 5.1 3.4 Events per Million Access Lines 2.07 0.94 4.42 2.40 0.67 12.22 5.27 12.39 7.54 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 34.4 33.3 80.5 58.7 201.1 48.6 29.1 91.3 110.4 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 13.9 31.8 18.7 31.9 32.5 7.0 11.0 5.1 9.4 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 338.0 374.3 946.9 1,452.3 786.5 256.6 242.2 166.1 763.3 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 698.2 350.2 4,184.5 3,484.5 530.2 3,134.6 1,275.9 2,058.5 5,756.6 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-6.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • 223.4 322.4 102.8 279.4 226.9 For Unscheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 42 16 102 44 15 187 85 225 55 Events per Hundred Switches 2.9 1.4 6.2 3.4 1.9 11.1 5.9 5.1 3.4 Events per Million Access Lines 2.07 0.89 4.42 2.40 0.87 12.22 5.27 12.31 7.54 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 34.4 37.7 80.5 58.7 201.1 48.6 29.1 91.1 110.4 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 13.9 30.5 18.7 31.9 32.5 7.0 11.0 5.1 9.4 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 338.0 319.4 946.9 1,452.3 786.5 256.6 242.2 165.3 763.3 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 698.2 283.3 4,184.5 3,484.5 687.7 3,134.6 1,275.9 2,034.2 5,756.6 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-6.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 83 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A TELEPHONE BY INCOME RACE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 6 - 27 Table 6.7 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 6 - 28 Table 6.7 Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail NOVEMBER 1983 TOTAL 91.4 93.7 93.1 95.0 78.8 83.9 80.7 84.6 UNDER $5,000 71.7 78.4 75.7 81.9 62.7 70.4 58.3 64.6 $5,000 - $7,499 82.7 87.2 84.5 88.5 74.7 82.0 71.1 76.5 $7,500 - $9,999 88.2 90.9 89.6 92.2 80.5 83.9 72.6 77.9 $10,000 - $12,499 89.7 92.7 91.2 93.9 82.0 86.2 76.8 82.1 $12,500 - $14,999 92.1 94.6 93.4 95.2 82.5 90.7 89.8 91.7 $15,000 - $17,499 94.6 96.2 94.9 96.4 91.7 95.1 86.9 90.8 $17,500 - $19,999 95.7 97.4 96.1 97.7 91.4 95.0 88.4 91.5 $20,000 - $24,999 96.9 97.8 97.4 98.2 91.2 93.2 93.1 94.3 $25,000 -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual00.pdf
  • 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 661.1 58.2 49.1 21.3 1095.0 245.6 35.7 1035.5 337.8 9. Natural Causes 618.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1286.5 0.0 0.0 258.3 7249.8 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 80.4 12. External Power Failure 252.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 162.5 80.5 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 603.9 14. Remote 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1230.8 15. Other/Unknown 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 844.2 23.1 0.0 159.0 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications Table 1(d):Company Comparision -- 2000 Customer Perception Surveys Company BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual01.pdf
  • 0.0 0.0 8. Hardware Failure 95.3 89.5 310.2 19.7 107.2 124.6 68.2 320.9 230.9 9. Natural Causes 21.6 0.0 204.1 0.0 12,005.2 0.0 17.2 92.1 50.3 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 173.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,843.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 12. External Power Failure 110.0 951.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 124.9 0.0 80.5 0.0 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 68.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 620.0 14. Remote 113.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.6 15. Other/Unknown 10.6 0.0 8.0 9.1 0.0109,729.1 71.5 0.0 136.1 * Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications. Table 1(c) Company Comparison Switch Downtime Causes As of December 31, 2001 17 BellSouth Qwest
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • 45.8 8. Hardware Failure 212.6 351.9 331.4 134.5 31.0 2530.6 327.3 1406.0 995.7 9. Natural Causes 8.3 273.3 759.5 45.5 0.0 52.8 714.1 170.6 679.4 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.0 9.1 0.8 12. External Power Failure 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.5 0.0 0.0 47.5 57.5 80.5 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 791.2 0.0 20.0 195.0 14. Remote 0.0 0.0 12.9 4.3 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 648.2 15. Other/Unknown 0.0 24.1 140.8 225.1 13.7 0.0 54.9 0.0 418.4 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications Table 1(d): Company Comparision -- 1996 Customer Perception Surveys Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • New York 1,165.0 335.0 830.1 533.1 297.0 82.64 26.52 116.26 225.42 71.6NY North Carolina 437.6 317.6 120.0 87.3 32.7 7.61 1.13 2.87 11.62 21.1NC North Dakota 12.3 5.3 7.0 4.9 2.1 1.04 0.11 (0.31) 0.84 1.3ND Ohio 446.1 359.1 87.0 57.4 29.6 1.42 1.54 0.95 3.91 25.7OH Oklahoma 169.0 158.8 10.2 4.0 6.2 (0.95) 0.03 (0.00) (0.92) 7.1OK Oregon 115.1 80.5 34.6 22.9 11.6 1.73 (0.13) (0.55) 1.06 10.6OR Pennsylvania 528.9 264.0 264.9 155.8 109.2 16.06 37.56 9.75 63.37 45.8PA Rhode Island 28.1 19.0 9.1 2.3 6.8 0.69 0.14 0.47 1.30 5.5RI South Carolina 97.2 65.7 31.6 24.1 7.5 1.12 (0.14) 0.78 1.75 5.7SC South Dakota 10.9 6.3 4.5 3.2 1.3 0.59 (0.03) (0.37) 0.19 1.2SD Tennessee 190.0 109.2 80.8 58.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • Interexchange All Reporting Cos.$116,558.8 $9,101.4$107,457.4$75,502.5$31,954.9$13,705.5$4,104.4$12,923.9$30,733.7$1,221.2 Bell Operating Cos.108,691.4 8,162.3 100,529.1 70,405.5 30,123.6 12,786.1 3,781.6 12,450.9 29,018.5 1,105.1 All Other Cos. 7,867.4 939.1 6,928.3 5,097.0 1,831.3 919.4 322.8 472.9 1,715.2 116.2 Alabama 1,677.1 73.3 1,603.8 1,206.8 397.0 200.8 51.1 127.8 379.7 17.3AL Arizona 1,934.7 144.5 1,790.2 1,204.8 585.4 239.0 91.7 222.0 552.7 32.7AZ Arkansas 850.4 101.4 748.9 554.7 194.2 78.1 32.2 80.5 190.8 3.5AR California 14,509.1 2,033.3 12,475.8 8,953.1 3,522.7 1,646.8 341.0 1,456.9 3,444.7 78.0CA Colorado 2,300.2 134.3 2,165.9 1,474.4 691.5 276.6 100.2 279.2 656.0 35.5CO Connecticut 1,643.5 1,643.5 1,108.3 535.2 190.6 90.9 243.1 524.6 10.6CT Delaware 320.8 22.7 298.2 197.7 100.4 32.5 15.1 47.2 94.8 5.7DE District of Columbia 686.2 39.5 646.7 375.5 271.1 72.1 41.7 149.8 263.6 7.5DC Florida 7,777.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • MT Nebraska 604.0 49.5 554.5 375.1 179.4 53.7 32.6 84.3 170.6 8.8 NE Nevada 778.1 84.3 693.8 446.0 247.8 108.3 42.2 87.4 237.9 9.9 NV New Hampshire 450.9 15.4 435.5 272.6 162.9 65.4 21.7 69.6 156.7 6.2 NH New Jersey 3,745.7 218.2 3,527.6 2,195.0 1,332.6 513.1 144.3 637.4 1,294.8 37.8 NJ New Mexico 637.3 37.7 599.5 379.6 219.9 85.4 39.8 80.5 205.7 14.2 NM New York 7,674.4 280.0 7,394.3 4,983.2 2,411.2 917.0 240.7 1,164.0 2,321.7 89.5 NY North Carolina 3,139.0 267.6 2,871.4 1,969.5 901.9 412.0 105.4 347.9 865.3 36.6 NC North Dakota 144.7 4.7 140.0 85.6 54.4 16.6 11.0 23.2 50.8 3.5 ND Ohio 4,091.2 334.5 3,756.7 2,698.2 1,058.5 464.9 133.7 422.7 1,021.3 37.2 OH Oklahoma 1,166.9 142.7 1,024.2 706.4 317.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 33 1,179,594 66.8 442,368 25.0 144,200 8.2 1,766,162 91.8 OR PENNSYLVANIA 38 5,427,882 77.6 1,206,241 17.2 364,077 5.2 6,998,200 94.8 PA RHODE ISLAND 1 582,654 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 582,654 100.0 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 28 1,261,631 67.1 143,770 7.6 474,964 25.3 1,880,365 74.7 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 31 293,420 77.8 0 0.0 83,853 22.2 377,273 77.8 SD TENNESSEE 25 2,366,159 80.5 214,499 7.3 359,652 12.2 2,940,310 87.8 TN TEXAS 56 7,348,883 77.1 1,600,041 16.8 583,144 6.1 9,532,068 93.9 TX UTAH 13 886,510 95.6 0 0.0 41,195 4.4 927,705 95.6 UT VERMONT 9 299,272 84.3 0 0.0 55,873 15.7 355,145 84.3 VT VIRGINIA 21 2,807,409 75.8 798,414 21.6 97,076 2.6 3,702,899 97.4 VA WASHINGTON 22 2,175,315 69.4 682,240 21.8 278,117 8.9 3,135,672
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 450.9 70.2 380.8 268.5 112.2 23.7 33.3 53.1 110.0 2.2 DC FLORIDA 4,487.0 332.5 4,154.6 3,186.3 972.1 573.1 230.6 114.6 918.2 53.9 FL GEORGIA 1,977.5 109.8 1,867.7 1,413.8 456.2 260.4 108.0 65.3 433.7 22.5 GA HAWAII 475.7 112.5 363.3 278.1 85.2 36.9 34.9 11.4 83.2 2.0 HI IDAHO 280.9 19.9 261.0 188.8 83.9 46.5 21.1 12.9 80.5 3.4 ID ILLINOIS 3,153.1 348.1 2,805.0 2,164.0 641.3 309.1 212.0 93.4 614.5 26.8 IL INDIANA 1,360.0 174.4 1,185.6 913.7 272.7 141.9 79.8 39.2 260.9 11.8 IN IOWA 595.1 36.9 558.2 417.2 142.7 57.2 44.2 36.2 137.6 5.1 IA KANSAS 634.4 36.8 597.5 449.0 148.6 67.1 37.2 39.4 143.7 4.9 KS KENTUCKY 804.7 56.0 748.7 579.9 178.6 104.4 42.3 25.5 172.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 485.6 238.4 107.5 125.2 471.0 14.5 AZ Arkansas 841.5 68.7 772.9 579.8 193.1 91.2 42.6 51.4 185.3 7.8AR California 13,071.2 1,037.3 12,033.9 9,110.0 2,923.8 1,459.0 569.3 806.6 2,834.9 89.0CA Colorado 2,062.7 129.0 1,933.7 1,370.8 563.0 261.2 122.1 163.6 546.8 16.1CO Connecticut 1,393.7 7.7 1,386.0 968.4 417.6 164.7 140.6 91.5 396.8 20.8CT Delaware 297.8 17.7 280.1 187.9 92.2 30.6 19.1 30.7 80.5 11.8DE District of Columbia 663.2 59.2 604.0 374.9 229.1 71.8 39.3 107.4 218.5 10.5DC Florida 7,273.2 638.7 6,634.5 4,799.2 1,835.3 1,030.8 359.5 376.7 1,767.0 68.3 FL Georgia 3,475.6 176.9 3,298.6 2,445.6 853.0 423.5 180.9 224.7 829.2 23.9GA Hawaii 590.7 89.6 501.1 362.4 138.7 66.0 36.0 30.3 132.3 6.4 HI Idaho 458.3 23.2 435.1 279.3 155.8 78.4 36.9 33.8 149.1 6.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • North Carolina 2,411.4 311.9 2,099.5 1,548.8 547.7 282.0 86.1 112.4 480.5 679.0 NC North Dakota 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND Ohio 2,976.4 372.0 2,604.5 1,980.9 626.1 294.6 142.2 120.8 557.6 820.6 OH Oklahoma 874.8 148.1 726.7 550.3 177.6 93.4 25.0 41.4 159.8 226.2 OK Oregon 295.8 39.4 256.5 191.7 64.8 30.1 12.8 12.4 55.3 80.5 OR Pennsylvania 3,306.8 231.9 3,074.8 2,287.0 788.1 375.0 100.3 228.3 703.6 1,032.2 PA Rhode Island 263.1 16.5 246.6 174.5 72.0 28.4 8.8 22.9 60.1 91.8 RI South Carolina 887.9 96.7 791.3 589.4 202.6 107.4 24.4 40.5 172.3 237.2 SC South Dakota 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SD Tennessee 1,452.8 184.6 1,268.2 923.3 345.3 168.5 43.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
  • 1000.0 433.0 40439 325 39077 324 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 7 23 631.8 518.0 38673 315 35708 316 0.0 0.0 99.2 TX AMARILLO 10 9 20.8 466.0 36500 313 33165 304 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 14 15 50.0 464.0 24095 285 23951 285 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX ARLINGTON 68 42 105.6 360.0 14497 3771 17975 3879 0.0 0.0 80.5 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-35 TX AUSTIN 7 56 1000.0 384.0 30828 1245
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1996/fcc96317.pdf
  • and 55 miles (88.5 km) DTV to NTSC No allotments permitted between: All Zones 6 miles (9.7 km) and 55 miles (88.5 km) Taboo Channels, DTV to NTSC only (+/- 2, +/- 3, +/- 4, +/- 5, +/- 7, +/- 8, +/- 14 and +/- 15 channels) No allotments permitted between: Zone I 15 miles (24.1 km) and 50 miles (80.5 km) Zone II & III 15 miles (24.1 km) and 60 miles (96.6 km) 99. Engineering Criteria Approach. To satisfy the engineering allotment criteria, the petitioner would have to show that a station operating at the maximum permissible ERP and antenna height on the proposed allotment would not exceed the engineering interference criteria with regard to any other existing allotment.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
  • determinations are consistent with the DTV Sixth Report and Order. There, the Commission specified a minimum geographic separation of 250 km (155 miles) for co-channel operations between DTV stations and the city-center in the areas where there are existing land mobile operations. Section 90.305(a) of our rules provides that full power land mobile base stations can be located up to 80.5 km (50 miles) from the city-center of one of the specified cities. Consequently, under the geographic separation standards adopted in the DTV Sixth Report and Order, a land mobile base station could choose to locate its station as close as 169.5 km (250 km - 80.5 km), or 105 miles to a neighboring DTV station. At this distance, a typical
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
  • these features confer a greater ability to correct problems and thus decrease the risks associated with such situations. Gilmore provides an engineering statement that indicates that use of channel 25 will meet almost all spacing requirements, with the following exceptions: (1) the DTV-to-NTSC spacing to WLCN-TV, channel 19 is 50.4 km rather than less than 24.1 km or greater than 80.5 km (but WLCN-TV operates at less than full facilities); and (2) the DTV-to- DTV spacing to channel 26, WLKY-TV, Louisville, Kentucy, is 162 km rather than 217.3 km. 433. Cosmos, the licensee of WFIE-TV, NTSC channel 14 in Evansville, Indiana, opposes Gilmore's petition to the extent that it proposes a change in the DTV Table for WFIE- TV to address
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
  • 1000.0 433.0 40439 325 39077 324 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 7 23 631.8 518.0 38673 315 35708 316 0.0 0.0 99.2 TX AMARILLO 10 9 20.8 466.0 36500 313 33165 304 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 14 15 50.0 464.0 24095 285 23951 285 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX ARLINGTON 68 42 105.6 360.0 14497 3771 17975 3879 0.0 0.0 80.5 DIGITAL TELEVISION EXISTING NTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURING TRANSITION CURRENT SERVICE NEW INTERFERENCE NTSC NTSC DTV DTV ANTENNA ----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATE AND CITY CHAN CHAN POWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sq km) (thous) (Sq km) (thous) (% NL Area) (% NL Pop) (%) B-35 TX AUSTIN 7 56 1000.0 384.0 30828 1245
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98231.pdf
  • receive sites registered as of September 17, 1998, and with the protected service area, of any authorized or previously- proposed cochannel station if: (i) The proposed transmitting antenna has an unobstructed electrical path to receive site(s) and/or the protected service area of any other station that utilizes, or would utilize, the same frequency; or (ii) The proposed transmitter is within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the coordinates of any such station. (2) An analysis of the potential for harmful adjacent channel interference with the receive sites registered as of September 17, 1998, and with the protected service area, of any authorized or previously-proposed station if the proposed transmitter is within 80.5 km (50 miles) of the coordinates of any station that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
  • 1000.0 433.0 40439 325 39077 324 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 7 23 631.8 518.0 38673 315 35708 316 0.0 0.0 99.2 TX AMARILLO 10 9 20.8 466.0 36500 313 33165 304 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX AMARILLO 14 15 50.0 464.0 24095 285 23951 285 0.0 0.0 100.0 TX ARLINGTON 68 42 105.6 360.0 14497 3771 17975 3879 0.0 0.0 80.5 TX AUSTIN 7 56 1000.0 384.0 30828 1245 30089 1269 0.0 0.0 97.1 TX AUSTIN 18 22 66.7 335.0 18312 904 18352 904 4.3 0.8 98.8 TX AUSTIN 24 33 81.4 387.0 22472 997 20626 965 1.7 0.2 100.0 TX AUSTIN 36 21 158.2 374.0 25028 1084 23977 1044 0.1 0.0 99.9 TX AUSTIN 42 43 82.7 393.0 17588 911
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/TV_Notices/pnmm8116.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/TV_Notices/pnmm8116.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/TV_Notices/pnmm8116.wp
  • For this purpose, a "taboo" channel relationship exists where the NTSC station would be 2, 3, 4, 7 or 8 channels below the DTV station channel or the NTSC station would be 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 14 or 15 channels above the DTV station channel. For such stations, the distances specified for new DTV allotments in Section 73.623(d) are: 80.5 km if either the NTSC or the DTV application site is in TV Zone I; and 96.6 km if neither the NTSC nor the DTV application site is in TV Zone I. DTV Allotment Exchanges Through the application process, broadcasters are permitted to negotiate exchanges of DTV allotments in the same community, same TV market or in adjacent markets, thereby
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
  • Commission noted that in the DTV Sixth Report and Order the Commission specified a minimum geographic separation of 250 kilometers (155 miles) for co-channel operations between DTV stations and the city-center in the areas where there are existing land mobile operations.182 Section 90.305(a) of the Commission's Rules provides that maximum facility land mobile base stations can be located up to 80.5 km (50 mi) from the city-center of one of Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 183 See 47 C.F.R. � 90.305(a). 184 47 C.F.R. � 90.545. 185 See para. 92, supra. 186 See Public Safety Spectrum Second Notice, 12 FCC Rcd at 17802-04 (paras. 232-239). The TV Grade B service contour is where the D/U signal ratio is applied. Thus, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00105.doc
  • 1. The authority citation for Part 80 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 4, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply 48 Stat. 1064-1068, 1081-1105, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151-155, 301-609; 3 UST 3450, 3 UST 4726, 12 UST 2377. Section 80.5 is amended to read as follows: Subpart A - General Information * * * * * � 80.5 Definitions. * * * * * Digital selective calling (DSC). * * * The operational and technical characteristics of this system are contained in Recommendations ITU-R M.493 and ITU-R M.541. (See subpart W of this part.) * * * * * Distress
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00271.doc
  • and imminent danger and in need of immediate assistance; (2) a Level 2 event is one in which there is a particular urgency regarding the safety of an entity; and (3) a Level 3 event is one in which a delay in a communication transmission could adversely affect the safety or property of an entity. See generally 47 C.F.R. � 80.5 (providing definitions for priorities in the Maritime Services). See Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements for Meeting Federal, State and Local Public Safety Agency Communication Requirements Through the Year 2010, WT Docket No. 96-86, FCC 00-242, Second Report and Order, July 13, 2000. Id. � 6 NCC Report at 15 � 47. Id. at 15 � 45; see supra
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.wp
  • 861 (1985) (UHF-TV Sharing NPRM). 387 See UHF-TV Sharing NPRM, 101 FCC 2d at 862. 388 See Sixth Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 14,588. 67 against potential land mobile interference to and from TV stations, the Commission established land mobile/TV sharing criteria.380 Under the criteria adopted for the 470-512 MHz band, land mobile base stations must be located within 80.5 km (50 mi) of the geographic centers of these eleven cities.381 Land mobile base stations also must meet certain geographic separation requirements from co-channel and adjacent channel TV stations.382 For co-channel operations, the geographic separations are based upon providing a signal ratio of at least 50 dB383 between the desired TV signal and undesired co-channel land mobile signal (D/U signal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00300.doc
  • the Petition for Forbearance filed by RegioNet Wireless Licenses, LLC on August 31, 1999, IS GRANTED to the extent discussed above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary 47 C.F.R. � 80.102. Petition for Forbearance filed by RegioNet Wireless License, LLC (filed August 31, 1999) (Petition). 47 C.F.R. � 80.102(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 80.102(a)(2). Petition at 1. 47 C.F.R. �� 80.5, 80.385(a)(1); Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd 16949, 17004 � 111 (1997) (Maritime Second Report and Order). See Amendment of Parts 2 and 80 of the Commission's Rules Applicable to Automated Maritime Telecommunications Systems (AMTS), First Report and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 437,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-258044A1.html
  • copy of this NAL shall be sent by regular mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Scottie E. Kennedy at his record of address. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James C. Hawkins New Orleans Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 301 247 U.S.C. 301. 3See 47 C.F.R. 80.373(f). 447 C.F.R. 80.13. 5 47 C.F.R. 80.13(c). 6See 47 C.F.R. 80.5, 80.13. 7Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-258045A1.html
  • copy of this NAL shall be sent by regular mail and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Danny R. McKinney at his record of address. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James C. Hawkins New Orleans Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 301 247 U.S.C. 301. 3See 47 C.F.R. 80.373(f). 447 C.F.R. 80.13. 5 47 C.F.R. 80.13(c). 6See 47 C.F.R. 80.5, 80.13. 7Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-258874A1.html
  • the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission authorized by this Act...." See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991). 347 U.S.C. 301. 4See 47 C.F.R. 80.373(f). 5Id. 647 C.F.R. 80.13. 747 C.F.R. 80.13(c). 8See 47 C.F.R. 80.5, 80.13. 947 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(4). 1047 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D). 1147 U.S.C. 503(b). 1247 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, 1.80. 13See 47 C.F.R. 1.1914. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258874A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258874A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260035A1.html
  • accordance with the procedures outlined in 76.609(h) and shall be limited as follows: Over 54 MHz up to and including 216 MHz - 20 micro-volts per meter, measured at 3 meters.'' At the time of the inspection, the agents observed signal leakage on the frequency of 121.2625 MHz at the following locations: In the alley next to 114 fourth St. 80.5 ?V/m 205 Lincoln Ave. . 64.5 ?V/m 1309 Mathison Dr. 145 ?V/m 3. Pursuant to Section 308(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,2 and Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, Northland must submit a written statement concerning this matter within 20 days of release of this Notice. The response must fully explain each violation, must contain a statement
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282594A1.html
  • violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'repeated', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.5. 47 C.F.R. S: 80.334. 47 C.F.R. S: 80.335(e). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 87.193 - 87.199. See, e.g., Grant Lam, 22 FCC Rcd 6341 (EB 2007); AMERI-KING Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 2616 (EB 2008); Compatible Electronics, 23 FCC Rcd 2621 (EB 2008). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S:1.80. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E).
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308259A1.html
  • The only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 15.1 et seq. The field strength of the signal on frequency 98.3 MHz was measured at 1,449 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 80.5 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 250uV/m at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S: 301. You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1597A1.html
  • address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 301. 2Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200532620003 (Enf. Bur., New Orleans Office, April 6, 2005) (``NAL''). 347 U.S.C. 503(b). 447 C.F.R. 1.80. 547 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D). 6See 47 C.F.R. 80.373(f). 747 C.F.R. 80.13. 847 C.F.R. 80.13(c). 9See 47 C.F.R. 80.5, 80.13. 10Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2365A1.html
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis P. Carlton Regional Director, South Central Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 U.S.C. 301. 2Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200532700008 (Enf. Bur., Tampa Office, May 9, 2005) (``NAL''). 347 U.S.C. 503(b). 447 C.F.R. 1.80. 547 U.S.C. 503(b)(2)(D). 647 U.S.C. 301. 7See 47 C.F.R. 80.373(f). 8Id. 947 C.F.R. 80.13. 1047 C.F.R. 80.13(c). 11See 47 C.F.R. 80.5, 80.13. 12See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991). 13Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that ``[t]he term `willful,' ... means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-438A1.html
  • 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/Acct. No. 200832860001 (Enf. Bur., Western Region, Honolulu Resident Agent Office, released May 29, 2008). 47 C.F.R.. S: 80.89(a). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80. 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.5. 47 C.F.R. S: 80.334. 47 C.F.R. S: 80.335(e). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 87.193 - 87.199. See, e.g., Grant Lam, 22 FCC Rcd 6341 (EB 2007); AMERI-KING Corporation, 23 FCC Rcd 2616 (EB 2008); Compatible Electronics, 23 FCC Rcd 2621 (EB 2008). NAL at para. 5. Mens rea is defined "[a]s an element of criminal responsibility: a guilty mind; a guilty
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-590A1.html
  • Honolulu Resident Agent Office, rel. May 29, 2008) (NAL). 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). Section 80.89(a) of the Rules states that "[s]tations must not: . . . [e]ngage in superfluous radiocommunications." 47 C.F.R. S: 80.89(a). An EPIRB station is "a station in the maritime mobile service the emissions of which are intended to facilitate search and rescue operations." 47 C.F.R. S: 80.5. A distress alert, such as one from an EPIRB, is considered false "if it was transmitted without any indication that a mobile unit or person was in distress and required immediate assistance." 47 C.F.R. S: 80.334. The Rules require that "[i]f for any reason an EPIRB is activated inadvertently [the licensee shall] immediately contact the nearest U.S. Coast Guard unit
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 2000 2001 2002 2003 Percent Change 1998 to 2003 Australia $1.25 $1.09 $1.01 $0.68 $0.30 $0.42 $0.55 $0.51 $0.38 $0.27 $0.25 -39.9% Brazil 1.06 0.97 0.96 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.57 0.45 0.25 0.22 0.14 -78.8 Canada 0.41 0.36 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.19 0.16 -48.4 China 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 0.18 -80.5 Colombia 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 0.11 -85.2 Dominican Republic 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.16 -64.7 Egypt 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 0.21 -78.8 El Salvador 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60 0.32 0.28 0.13 -84.3 France 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files08/CREPOR08.PDF
  • 56.2 $3,982,478 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,143,820,295 0.0 0.0 0.7 31.2 68.1 Korea, North $69,361 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.9 76.1 $67 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $208 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 105,785 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 Korea, South $35,011,745 0.0 0.0 0.3 15.9 83.8 $12,199,916 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.4 64.6 $9,253,894 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,023,431,673 0.0 0.0 0.4 19.1 80.5 Laos $1,330,042 0.0 0.0 8.6 21.7 69.7 $235,400 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $161,414 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 29,948,266 0.0 0.0 9.1 18.6 72.3 Macau $814,439 0.0 0.0 1.3 16.6 82.0 $483,321 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 $391,243 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 32,460,355 0.0 0.0 1.2 33.8 65.1 Malaysia $20,389,568 0.0 1.1 0.4 15.2 83.2 $1,151,002 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 91.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
  • 85.0 Nov-98194 15 10 9 31.0 n/a 84.0 Mar-00190 15 8 10 31.656.783.7 Mar-01190 13 7 9 38.065.289.1 Danbury CT Mar-96191 6 3 4 46.5n/a 95.8 Nov-97191 6 2 5 51.4n/a100.0 Nov-98192 6 2 5 52.7 n/a 100.0 Mar-00189 7 2 5 52.5100.0n/a Mar-01191 7 2 5 52.4100.0n/a Morgantown-Clarksburg-Fairmont Mar-96178 20 9 9 26.5n/a 63.3 Nov-97179 21 10 10 56.6n/a 80.5 Nov-98184 21 11 10 67.9 n/a 86.6 Mar-00187 22 10 10 63.575.585.1 Mar-01192 22 9 10 62.276.191.0 Terre Haute IN Mar-96180 21 14 9 35.1 n/a 79.3 Nov-97183 23 15 11 35.1n/a 73.0 Nov-98187 22 12 11 36.7 n/a 75.3 Mar-00192 22 11 10 40.655.378.6 Mar-01193 23 11 11 35.855.079.1 Yakima WA Mar-96186 17 7 8 34.4n/a 89.4 Nov-97187 17