FCC Web Documents citing 90.729

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-117A1.txt
  • had only taken delivery of their base station transceivers on or before January 26, 1996, were also allowed to permanently relocate to that site. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(2). Application to Modify a License in the 220-222 MHz Band, filed by Dale Eaton and Henry Zappia d/b/a/ Arizona Two-Way Communications on April 30, 1996. Waiver Request at 2. Id. Section 90.729 of the Commission's rules specifies the maximum ERP depending on the antenna's HAAT. 47 C.F.R. § 90.729. Waiver Request at 3. In fact, Arizona claims that the nearest co-channel station, call sign WPCY306, is located 99.60 miles from its originally authorized site. Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3)(ii). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-3036 November 25, 2005 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON REQUEST FOR WAIVER BY MORGAN COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Comment Date: December 27, 2005 Reply Date: January 11, 2006 By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) seeks comment on a request by Morgan County, West Virginia (Morgan County) for waiver of Sections 90.729 and 90.733(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.729, 90.733(d). On April 12, 2004, Morgan County filed its waiver request in conjunction with its application, FCC File No. 0001691866, for several frequencies in the 220 MHz band. Specifically, it requests waivers of power, antenna height, and channel bandwidth limitations. By way of background, Morgan County is located in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1013A1.txt
  • a full-service hospital, Morgan County qualifies for use of both sets of channels. Morgan County proposes to use the channels in support of mobile command centers that will provide on-scene emergency management capabilities and interoperability with neighboring governmental entities on a mutual aid basis. Morgan County requests waivers of two rule sections. First, Morgan County seeks a waiver of Section 90.729(a) of the Commission's Rules, which limits the effective radiated power (ERP) of Morgan County's proposed base stations to thirty watts, and limits the ERP of mobile units to fifty watts. Morgan County states that the limits may be appropriate in areas of flat terrain, but they are not sufficient to provide adequate coverage in the county's very mountainous terrain. As
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_e.pdf
  • emission mask on all "inside" channels. Thus, so long as licensees combining multiple authorizations to create a contiguous channel block maintain the required co-channel protection on all of the channels that comprise the channel block, we clarify that such licensees will be permitted to eliminate the emission mask on all "inside" channels. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-93 47 C.F.R. § 90.729(a). For references to HAAT in the text of the 220 MHz Third Report and Order, see 12 FCC 140 Rcd at 11008 (para. 139), 11013 (para. 148), 11026 (para. 174). 47 C.F.R. § 90.729(b). For references to height above ground in the text of the 220 MHz Third Report and 141 Order, see 12 FCC Rcd at 11007-08 (paras. 138-139),
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc960027.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc960027.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc960027.wp
  • Mountains, the San Gabriel Mountains, the Verdugo 31 Mountains, and the Santa Ana Mountains are in close proximity to the greater Los Angeles area. See Section 90.621(b)(3) of the Commission's Rules. 32 Page 8 All licensees applying for modification of their authorization must also ensure that they comply with all applicable technical and operational rules (e.g., Section 90.723(d) and Section 90.729 of the Commission's Rules). 10. We believe that this modification procedure will enable 220 MHz licensees to provide service in the geographic area they were authorized to serve pursuant to their initial application, while accommodating their need to relocate their base stations for technical or other legitimate reasons. In addition, we believe that our decision to permit Phase I licensees
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.wp
  • 221-222 MHz bands anywhere within their area of operation -- subject to compliance with prescribed environmental, air safety and international regulations outlined in para. 80, supra -- so long as: (1) transmissions from fixed stations on frequencies in the 220-221 MHz band meet all relevant technical rules of Subpart T required for land mobile base stations (e.g., Sections 90.723 and 90.729); (2) for EA and Regional licensees, the co-channel protection criteria prescribed in Section IV.C.6, infra, and the field strength limits prescribed in Section IV.C.7, infra, are met for all fixed stations transmitting on frequencies in the 220-221 MHz band; and (3) for Phase II licensees and Phase I nationwide licensees, transmissions on frequencies in the 221-222 MHz band do not
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.wp
  • co-channel licensees in their areas, the increased strength of out-of-band signals would not result in any increased Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-93 Id. 136 Glenayre Third Order Petition at 2; PCIA Third Order Reply at 2. 137 Glenayre Third Order Petition at 2; PCIA Third Order Reply at 2. 138 Comtech Third Order Petition at 10-11. 139 47 C.F.R. § 90.729(a). For references to HAAT in the text of the 220 MHz Third Report and Order, see 12 FCC Rcd at 11008 140 (para. 139), 11013 (para. 148), 11026 (para. 174). PAGE 36 likelihood of harmful interference to co-channel licensees. This decision met with a generally 136 favorable response. Both Glenayre and PCIA remark that the Commission's action will permit 137
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.wp
  • follows: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Channel No. Sub-band Frequencies (MHz) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-40 A 220.0025-220.1975/221.0025-221.1975 41-160 C 220.2025-220.7975/221.2025-221.7975 161-200 B 220.8025-220.9975/221.8025-221.9975 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (c) U.S./Mexico border area. (1) Channels 16-30, 45-60, 76-90, 106-120, 136-145, 156-165, 178-194 are available for primary use within the United States within 120 km (74.6 mi) of the Mexican border, subject to the power and antenna height conditions specified in § 90.729 and the use restrictions specified in §§ 90.717-90.721. (2) Channels 195-200 are available to both the United States and Mexico in the border area on an unprotected basis. Use is limited to a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 2 watts and a maximum antenna height of 6.1 meters (20 ft) above ground. (3) Channels allotted for primary Mexican use
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000117.doc
  • had only taken delivery of their base station transceivers on or before January 26, 1996, were also allowed to permanently relocate to that site. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.753(c)(2). Application to Modify a License in the 220-222 MHz Band, filed by Dale Eaton and Henry Zappia d/b/a/ Arizona Two-Way Communications on April 30, 1996. Waiver Request at 2. Id. Section 90.729 of the Commission's rules specifies the maximum ERP depending on the antenna's HAAT. 47 C.F.R. § 90.729. Waiver Request at 3. In fact, Arizona claims that the nearest co-channel station, call sign WPCY306, is located 99.60 miles from its originally authorized site. Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3)(ii). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C.