FCC Web Documents citing 101.45

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-100A1.txt
  • at 1 � 1. See, e.g., American Trucking Ass'n v. Frisco Transportation Co., 358 U.S. 145 (1958); Howard Sober, Inc. v. I.C.C., 628 F.2d 36 (D.C. Cir. 1980); APC PCS LLC et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 23570 (1998); Hazle-Tone Order, 13 FCC Rcd at. 1551 � 10. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i); see also Advanced Radio Technology Ltd., Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 2130, 2131-32 (PSPWD 1999). FCC File No. 9504370. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1134 (rel. May 10, 1995). FCC File No. 9504852. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1136 (rel. May 24, 1995). See Amendment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1118A1.txt
  • reconsideration of the dismissal of the February Amendment. Plaincom had argued, inter alia, that the December Amendment contained a clerical error, and that the February Amendment, which attempted to correct this error, was an amendment of right, effective upon filing. The Division determined, however, that the February Amendment was properly dismissed because it did not satisfy the requirements of Section 101.45(f) of the Commission's Rules, in that there was no evidence within the four corners of the December Amendment to indicate a clerical error existed. On November 23, 1999, we dismissed, inter alia, the Plaincom and Astrolink applications in accordance with the July 1999 MO&O. On November 29, 1999, Astrolink requested reconsideration of the Division's Plaincom Order. On the same date,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1129A1.txt
  • and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997) (R&O and Second NPRM); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Daisy chains occur when an application is mutually exclusive, i.e would cause interference, with an application in an adjacent community, which is mutually exclusive with an application in another adjacent community, and so on. Low Power Television and Television Translator Service, Report and Order, MM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1397A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1397 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1397 � � � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� t u u w w x x � � (c) � " � (R) � � � � � � � t
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-150A1.txt
  • As noted above, however, DCT specifically disputed that conclusion. See, e.g., Letter from Marilyn J. McDermett, Associate Managing Director, FCC, to Jerrold D. Miller, Esq., 8 FCC Rcd 8817 (Nov. 23, 1993); Letter from Marilyn J. McDermett, Associate Managing Director, FCC, to Robert Ladd, 6 FCC Rcd 7066 (Oct. 8, 1991). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i). Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rule Making, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18642 � 90 (1997), aff'd, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12442-43 � 25 (1999). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-150 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-150 ^ _
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1532A1.txt
  • on Channels 4A/B and 13A/B in New York, NY. On October 21, 1994, DCT filed an amendment to its New York application to request only Channel 2A/B. Because DCT's original application did not contain a request for Channel 2A/B, it was deemed that DCT's October 21, 1994, amendment requesting Channel 2A/B was a major amendment pursuant to Sections 101.29(c)(1)(i) and 101.45(c) of the Commission's Rules. Thus, DCT's application received a new filing date of October 21, 1994, which was more than sixty days after the July 6, 1994, public notice announcing the acceptance of WinStar's applications for filing. Accordingly, in the Order, the Division dismissed DCT's late-filed competing New York application pursuant to Section 101.45(e) of the Commission's Rules. As previously
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-379A1.txt
  • DCT applications. On November 28, 1995, DCT filed amendments to both its Spokane and Kalamazoo applications in order to resolve any mutual exclusivity that existed with Milliwave's first-filed applications. On April 28, 1999, the Division released an Order granting Milliwave's petition to deny and dismissing the DCT applications. The Division concluded that the DCT applications were untimely pursuant to Section 101.45(b) of the Commission's Rules, because they were filed more than sixty days after the Milliwave applications with which they conflicted were placed on public notice. Discussion. Section 101.45(b) states that no application will be entitled to comparative consideration with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-653A1.txt
  • (Biztel). Biztel's application established a cut-off date of July 10, 1995 for filing competing applications. On August 25, 1995, WinStar filed a 39 GHz application for Channels 11A and 11B in the area of Stockton, CA. WinStar's application conflicted with the referenced applications filed by GEC and Biztel. On December 10, 1996, Biztel's application was dismissed as defective. Under Section 101.45(b) of the Commission's Rules, no application will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to comparative consideration with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of the public notice listing the first of the conflicting applications as accepted for filing. If an application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-713A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-713A1.txt
  • Wireless Division, Licensing and Techncial Analysis Branch (Branch) dismissed Likins's Lorain and Santa Rosa applications, pursuant to Section 1.934(f) of the Commission's Rules. The Branch found that Likins's applications conflicted with the previously-filed AT&T and Bay Area applications, and that, because Likins's applications were filed more than sixty days after the first-filed applications, Likins's applications were untimely pursuant to Section 101.45 of the Commission's Rules. On October 1, 1999, and October 27, 1999, Likins filed letters requesting a stay of the dismissals or, alternatively, reinstatement nunc pro tunc of his applications. 5. Discussion. Likins notes in both requests that he has filed an appeal seeking judicial review of the Commission's 39 GHz orders. He states that one of the issues in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-714A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-714A1.txt
  • 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18605 (1997) (Report and Order and Second NPRM). Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket No. 95-183, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-12448 � 37 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). July 29 MO&O at 12450-12452 � 44. Dismissal Letter at 1. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(f) (providing for the dismissal of early- or late-filed applications). Request. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). Request at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 3. See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958) (Virginia Petroleum), as revised by Washington
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-715A1.txt
  • 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18605 � 3 (1997) (Report and Order and Second NPRM). Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket No. 95-183, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-12448 � 37 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). Id. at 12450-12452 � 44. Dismissal Letter at 1. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(f) (providing for dismissal of early- or late-filed applications). Request. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999) (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). Request at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 3. See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958) (Virginia
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-716A1.txt
  • 30-day public notice period was not completed by the November 13, 1995 Freeze Order'' date. 4. On August 26, 1999, the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch) dismissed Likins's application. The mutually exclusive portion of the application had been filed after the sixty-day cut-off period created by the GEC application, thus, pursuant to Section 101.45(b) of the Commission's Rules, it was untimely. The remaining portion of the application was dismissed because that portion had not satisfied the thirty-day public notice requirement as of November 13, 1995. 5. Discussion. Likins notes that he has filed an appeal seeking judicial review of the Commission's 39 GHz orders. Likins states that one of the issues in that case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-788A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-788 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-788 � � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� � � � � � < = = ? ? @ @ b c q r s t v w y | �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-789A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-789 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-789 @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� - ! 0 3 `` - � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-794A1.txt
  • WinStar, No Wire and TCO and the mutual exclusivity was not resolved as of December 15, 1995. On October 19, 1999, the Division's Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch) dismissed HiCap's Palm Springs application. The mutually exclusive portion of the Palm Springs application had been filed after the sixty-day cut-off period created by the GEC application, thus, pursuant to Section 101.45(b) of the Commission's Rules, it was untimely. The remaining portion of the application was dismissed because that portion had not satisfied the thirty-day public notice requirement as of November 13, 1995. Discussion HiCap's requests make similar arguments, so we shall address them collectively. HiCap notes that it has filed an appeal seeking judicial review of the Commission's 39 GHz orders.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-799A1.txt
  • Application. On January 18, 1995, a Commco L.L.C. (Commco) 39 GHz application to provide service in the area of Lancatster, Pennsylvania was placed on public notice. On May 18, 1995, DCT filed a competing 39 GHz application to provide service in the area of York, Pennsylvania. On September 27, 1999, the Branch dismissed the DCT York application pursuant to Section 101.45 of the Commission's Rules, which provides that no application will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to a comparative consideration with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of the public notice listing the first of the conflicting applications as accepted for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-801A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-801 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-801 @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-804A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-804 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-804 @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� � � � � � ` ` � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ` ` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-805A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-805 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-805 � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� '' � � - - � � � " � � � � � � � � '' � � - - � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-807A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-807 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-807 � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� ... � � � � � � " � � " � � � � � � � ... � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-808A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-808 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-808 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-815A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-815A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-815A1.txt
  • and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-457 �� 83-97 (1997) (Report and Order); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9509664. DCT Petition for Reconsideration at 5 (filed Dec. 22, 1999) (Petition). Petition at 5. 39 GHz Applications Dismissed, Public Notice, DA 99-2631 (rel. Nov. 23, 1999). FCC File No. 9507189. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Weekly Receipts and Disposals,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-825A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-825 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-825 K K @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-539A1.txt
  • 15 FCC Rcd 9816, 9893 (2000); Brainerd Broadcasting Co., 38 FCC 1195, 1197 (1965); Empire State Broadcasting Corporation, et. al., 2 FCC Rcd 2793 (Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau 1987); United Educational Broadcasting, Inc., et. al., 7 FCC Rcd 6210, fn1 (Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau 1992). See also 47 C.F.R. �� 21.31, 22.131, 24.431, 90.7, 101.45. We have applied the interference standards set forth in 47 C.F.R. �� 73.37, 73.182 only to determine which applications are mutually exclusive. Determinations regarding the acceptability and grantability of these applications will not be made prior to auction. See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3571(h)(1)(ii); see also Broadcast Auction First Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 15978-15979; AM Filing Window Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1524A1.txt
  • � 1.934(f) See 47 U.S.C. � 1.113 (Note that the 30th day was on Saturday, July 29, 2000. Thus the last day was actually Monday, July 31, 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(e)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.935. Id. See Objection at 1. See Settlement Agreement at 1. MAS R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 11976 � 53. See 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(a). See, e.g., Liberty Productions, a Limited Partnership, et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 12061, 12065-67 �� 10-13 (2001) (settlement agreement rejected because approval would have allowed withdrawal of a winning bid and allow the winning bidder to obtain a license for less than its final bid). FCC File No. 0000079079: frequencies 932.31875/941.31875 MHz, FCC File No. 0000079282:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-871A1.txt
  • band. FlexCom now contends that its application for licenses in the 24 GHz band should have been governed by Commission rules for determining when competing applications for POFMS licenses are entitled to a comparative hearing if mutually exclusive. FlexCom claims that its purported POFMS application triggered a one-day window for the filing of competing applications pursuant to Sections 1.227(b)(4) and 101.45(d) of the Commission's rules. Those particular rules provide that a POFMS application must be filed within one day of a mutually exclusive application in order to be entitled to a comparative hearing with the other application. discussion We here deny FlexCom's Petition for Further Reconsideration. In the 24 GHz Report and Order, the Commission provided for the first time for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2217A1.txt
  • 6; Comments in CSR 7598-E at 6; Comments in CSR 7599-E at 6-7; Comments in CSR 7604-E at 9. Comments in CSR 7197-E & 7198-E at 12-13. See, e.g., Comments in CSR 7118-E & 7119-E at 10-11; Comments in CSR 7597-E at 5; Comments in CSR 7598-E at 5; Comments in CSR 7604-E at 10. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(f). The DRC's Comments cite to identical provisions in the now-repealed 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(e). Comments in CSR 7197-E & 7198-E at 10. Comments in CSR 7197-E & 7198-E at 10; Application of BellSouth Corp. Pursuant to Section 271 to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in South Carolina, 13 FCC Rcd 539, 561, � 38 (1997). See 47 U.S.C. � 271(c). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
  • licensees in the 2165-2200 MHz bands in cases where sharing between MSS and FS is not possible, and made various editorial changes to the Part 101 rules. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154 and 303. Section Number and Title: 101.4 Transition plan. 101.17 Performance requirements for the 38.6-40.0 GHz frequency band. 101.21 Technical content of applications. 101.31 Temporary and conditional authorizations. 101.45 Mutually exclusive applications. 101.55 Considerations involving transfer or assignment applications. 101.61 Certain modifications not requiring prior authorization in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service and 24 GHz Service. 101.63 Period of construction; certification of completion of construction. 101.69 Transition of the 1850-1990 MHz, 2110-2150 MHz, and 2160-2200 MHz bands from the fixed microwave services to personal communications services and emerging technologies.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-142A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). We note that Astrolink's Application No. 9506296 was dismissed on the basis of mutual exclusivity on January 12, 2000, by the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch. See Letter to Astrolink Communications, Inc. from Mary Shultz, Federal Communications Commission, (Jan. 12, 2000). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-143A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-143 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-143 { | � � � z { 5 6 7 8 9 Y o { � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� _ _ _ _ # Z ` # Z `
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-144A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC-00-144 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-144 , Z [ \ ` � � Z @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-145A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-145 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-145 o p q t � o @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-146A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Plaincom, Inc., Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3349 (WTB PSPWD 1999). Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. FCC, 326 U.S. 327 (1945). Application for Review at 23. WinStar Opposition at 20, citing Reuters Limited v. FCC, 781 F.2d 946, 951 (D.C. Cir. 1986). 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1994).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-147A1.txt
  • and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-147 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-147 P U � � � � � � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-148A1.txt
  • and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997) (R&O and Second NPRM); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). See Bachow Supplement to Application for Review at 3-5. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-148 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-148 9 '' � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� # + G O � � � � �#E�q�[f�'E�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-150A1.txt
  • and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-150 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-150 } ~  � � � | } 7 8 9 : ; [ q } @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� ... ... ... ... 2 < ? I � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-151A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-151 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-151 _ d � � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-152A1.txt
  • Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9506008. See Altron Application for Review at 1. See February Order, � 5. See id., � 9. See Altron Application for Review at 4-5. (citing Establishment of a Fee Collection Program to Implement the Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-156A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC-00-156 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-156 @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-157A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-157 M N O S � � � M M �� �� @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-158A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). File Nos. 9507730, 9507733, 9507737, 9507751, 9507759, 9507766, 9507767, 9507770, 9507772, 9507776, 9507778, 9507779, 9507782, 9507789, 9507790, 9507792, 9507802, 9507804. File Nos. 9510581, 9510582, 9510583, 9510584, 9510585, 9510588, 9601235, 9601242, 9601243, 9601244, 9601246, 9601247, 9601248, 9601249. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-158 Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-176A1.txt
  • Facilities in the 39 GHz Frequency Band at Various Locations Throughout the United States, and Plaincom, Inc., for License to Operate a Point-to-Point Microwave Facility in the 39 GHz Frequency Band in St. Louis, Missouri, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 17821 (WTB PSPWD 1999) (Order). Application for Review at 4. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9510171. FCC File Nos. 9600669, 9600676, 9600679, 9600680, 9600684, 9600686, 9600687, 9600688, 9600689, 9600692, 9600697, 9600699, 9600702, 9600704, 9600707, 9600709. Public Notice, Private Radio Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1090 (rel. Jul. 6, 1994). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-272A1_Erratum.doc
  • communicating with one or more nodal stations. * * * * * 10. Section 101.21 is amended by inserting the words "and 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.21(g). 11. Section 101.21 is amended by inserting the words "and 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.21(g). 12. Section 101.45 is amended by adding the words "and in the 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.45(b). 13. Section 101.61 is amended by adding the words ``and in the 24 GHz Service'' to the heading and by inserting, at the end of the section, the sentence: "This section also applies to 24 GHz licensees that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-315A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Application for Review at 1, 6. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (Consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit System v. Holiday
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-316A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). See AA&T Wireless Services, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5902 (WTB PSPWD rel. Mar. 30, 2000). See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-317A1.txt
  • and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997) (Report and Order and Second NPRM); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File Nos. 9510394 and 9510406. FCC File Nos. 9510391 and 9510393. Application for Review at 1, 8. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (Consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-319A1.txt
  • and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Therefore, Sintra's claims (Application for Review at 5-6) that its application for authorization did not violate the 60 day cut off for filing mutually exclusive applications is inapposite. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-318 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-319 I � `` � I �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-320A1.txt
  • Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). See id. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Letter from Mary Shultz, Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, to Linda Chester (Aug. 27, 1999). Id. Application for Review at 2, 5. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (Consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-321A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9510607. FCC File No. 9510601. Application for Review at 6. Id. FCC File No. 9409617. See Public Notice, Report No. 1118 (rel. Jan. 18, 1995). See Public Notice, Report No. 1142 (rel. Jul. 5, 1995). The authorization was ultimately assigned to ART
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-322A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File Nos. 96001236 and 9601372. FCC File No. 9601240. See Cambridge Partners, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, DA-804 (WTB PSPWD rel. Apr. 10, 2000). See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 1362). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-323A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9507932. FCC File No. 9600033. See HiCap Networks, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, DA-794 (WTB PSPWD rel. Apr. 10, 2000). See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-324A1.txt
  • Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File Nos. 9505285, 9505295, 9505297, 9505298, 9505299, 9505304, 9506000, 9506008, 9509656, 9510294, 9600055, 9600056, 9600066, 9600067, 9600070, 9600073, and 9600076. William G. Bowles, Jr. d/b/a Mid Missouri Mobilefone, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 61 Rad. Reg. (P&F) 2d 20 (CCB 1986) (Bowles) Answer Fort Smith,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-325A1.pdf
  • � 6 (WTB PSPWD 1999); Applications of Commco, L.L.C., Order, 14 FCC Rcd 17727, 17729 � 6 (WTB PSPWD 1999). See FCC File Nos. 9600663, 9600664, 9600669-9600690, 9600698, 9600710-9600714, 9600719, and 9600720. See Public Notice, Private Radio Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1090 (rel. July 6, 1994). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45 (b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Application for Review at 5-10. Id. at 13-14 (citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(6)(E)). Id. at 13-14. Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. FCC, 326 U.S. 327 (1945). Application for Review at 11-13. 47 U.S.C. � 405(a). 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(6)(E). Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. FCC, 326
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-328A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). March 30th Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 10079 � 4 (citing Letter from Mary Shultz, Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, to Wireless Telco (Sept. 27, 1999)). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(f) (providing for dismissal of early- or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-329A1.txt
  • of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997) (Report and Order and Second NPRM); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). File Nos. 9405451, 9408036, 9505287, 9505288, 9505289, 9505292, 9505294, 9505308, 9505312, 9510291, 9510296, 9600074. Files Nos. 9510293, 9510300, 9600057, 9600058, 9600059, 9600060, 9600061, 9600062, 9600063, 9600065, 9600068, 9600069, 9600071, 9600072, 9600075. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934. July 29 MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 12441-45 ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-331A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Application for Review at 1, 5. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (Consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit System v. Holiday
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-412A1.txt
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9600002. FCC File No. 9600014. FCC File No. 9600013. Paul R. Likins, Order, DA 00-713, (PSPWD WTB rel. Mar. 30, 2000); Paul R. Likins, Order, DA 00-716 (PSPWD WTB rel. Mar. 30, 2000). See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-452A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-452A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-452A1.txt
  • and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Cambridge Partners, Order on Reconsideration, DA 00-1397 (PSPWD WT rel. Jun. 23, 2000). See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 991346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F. 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised by Washington
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-453A1.txt
  • and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Daisy chains occur when an application is mutually exclusive, i.e. would cause interference, with an application in an adjacent community, which is mutually exclusive with an application in another adjacent community, and so on. Low Power Television and Television Translator Service, Report and Order, MM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-52A1.txt
  • On May 18, 1995, DCT filed a competing 39 GHz application in the West Palm Beach, Florida, area. On August 7, 1995, DCT filed an amendment to its application to eliminate the geographic overlap with WinStar's Miami Application. On September 11, 1997, the Division's Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch) dismissed DCT's West Palm Beach Application in accordance with Sections 101.45 and 101.35 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 101.45, 101.35. Section 101.45 provides that no application will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to comparative consideration with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of the public notice listing the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-69A1.txt
  • policy, which were pointed out in its petition for reconsideration.'' It argues that, pursuant to Section 553 of the APA, the Commission may not revoke a substantive right without a notice and comment proceeding. Sintra argues that, due to the freeze on acceptance of amendments of right following December 15, 1995, the Commission effectively revoked former Section 101.29 and Section 101.45 without a notice and comment proceeding. Although the Commission fully addressed these issues in the July 29 MO&O, we will nevertheless reiterate our findings as they apply to the above-captioned application. First, it is well settled that an application freeze is the type of procedural action that may be adopted without notice and comment. Moreover, Sintra's argument does not distinguish
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-79A1.txt
  • Channels 4A/B and 13A/B in New York, New York. On October 21, 1994, DCT filed an amendment to its New York application to request only Channel 2A/B. Because DCT's original application did not contain a request for Channel 2A/B, it was deemed that DCT's October 21, 1994, amendment requesting Channel 2A/B was a major amendment pursuant to Sections 101.29(c)(1)(i) and 101.45(c) of the Commission's Rules. Thus, DCT's application received a new filing date of October 21, 1994, which was more than sixty days after the July 6, 1994, public notice announcing the acceptance of WinStar's application for filing. Accordingly, in the Order, the Division dismissed DCT's late-filed competing New York application pursuant to Section 101.45(e) of the Commission's Rules. On January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-38A1.txt
  • 326 U.S. 327, 328-30 (1945) (applicants sought to use the same spectrum to operate their respective broadcast stations, the simultaneous operation of which would result in intolerable interference. Grant of one mutually exclusive application for broadcast license without affording a hearing on the other deprives the loser of opportunity for hearing provided by the Act); see also 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(a) (establishing that two applications are mutually exclusive in the Fixed Microwave Services when the grant of one ``would effectively preclude by reason of harmful electrical interference . . . the grant of one or more applications'' as determined by � 101.105 standards); see also 47 C.F.R. �� 21.31, 22.131, 24.431, and 90.7. Petitioners assume without argument that window-filed applications must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.txt
  • 326 U.S. 327, 328-30 (1945) (applicants sought to use the same spectrum to operate their respective broadcast stations, the simultaneous operation of which would result in intolerable interference. Grant of one mutually exclusive application for broadcast license without affording a hearing on the other deprives the loser of opportunity for hearing provided by the Act); see also 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(a) (establishing that two applications are mutually exclusive in the Fixed Microwave Services when the grant of one ``would effectively preclude by reason of harmful electrical interference . . . the grant of one or more applications'' as determined by � 101.105 standards). See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.37, 73.182, 73.183(b)(1). See also AM Auction No. 32 Mutually Exclusive Applicants Subject to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.pdf
  • notice listing: * * * * * (1) The acceptance for filing of common carrier applications, Local Multipoint Distribution Service applications, 24GHz Service applications, and major amendments thereto; * * * * * (3) The receipt of common carrier applications, Local Multipoint Distribution Service applications, and 24 GHz Service applications for minor modifications made pursuant to � 101.59; 15. Section 101.45 is proposed to be amended by adding the words "and in the 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.45(b). 16. Section 101.57 is proposed to be amended by inserting the words "or in the 24 GHz Service after the effective date of the Order" after the words "March 11, 1997" in subsection 101.57(a)(1)(ii). 17.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • 101.37 Public notice period (move to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 1.933 101.39 Dismissal and return of applications (move to 1.934 consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.41 Ownership changes and agreements to amend or dismiss 1.919, 1.927, 1.935 applications or pleadings (partially removed and rest moved to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.43 Opposition to applications (move to consolidated Part 1 1.939 Rule). 101.45 Mutually exclusive applications (revise to delete 101.45 reference to random selection procedure) 101.47 Consideration of applications (move to consolidated Part1.915 1 Rule). 101.53 Assignment or transfer of station authorizations (move 1.948 to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.57 Modification of station license (move to consolidated 1.947 Part 1 Rule). 101.59 Major/minor modifications (move to consolidated Part 11.929 Rule). 101.61 Certain modifications
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.wp
  • Local Multipoint Distribution Service applications for minor modifications made pursuant to � 101.59; (4) Information which the Commission in its discretion believes of public significance; and (5) special environmental considerations as required by Part 1 of this chapter. * * * * * (e) Paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section shall not apply to FCC Form 175. 20. Section 101.45 is amended to revise the introduction to paragraph (b) as follows: * * * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-82 APPENDIX A :: PAGE 8 (b) A common carrier application, except in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service, will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to comparative consideration with one or more conflicting applications only
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/lmdsbp_e.pdf
  • Local Multipoint Distribution Service applications for minor modifications made pursuant to � 101.59; (4) Information which the Commission in its discretion believes of public significance; and (5) special environmental considerations as required by Part 1 of this chapter. * * * * * (e) Paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section shall not apply to FCC Form 175. 20. Section 101.45 is amended to revise the introduction to paragraph (b) as follows: * * * * * Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-82 APPENDIX A :: PAGE 8 (b) A common carrier application, except in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service, will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to comparative consideration with one or more conflicting applications only
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc970391.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc970391.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc970391.wp
  • of population served (as well as any additional service provided during the five-year build-out period); (3) A description of the 38.6-40.0 GHz band licensee's investments in its system(s) (type of facilities constructed and their operational status is required); (b) Any 38.6-40.0 GHz band licensees adjudged not to be providing substantial service will not have their licenses renewed. 88 5. In �101.45(d), amend to clarify that mutually exclusive applications in the 38.6-40.0 GHz band are subject to competitive bidding procedures. �101.45 Mutually exclusive applications * * * (d) Except for applications in the 38.6-40.0 GHz band, private operational fixed point-to-point microwave applications for authorization under this Part will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to comparative consideration
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc990179.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc990179.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc990179.wp
  • obligation under Section 309(j)(6)(E).105 26. Additionally, we decline to resolve pending mutually exclusive 39 GHz applications under the prior rules. Because the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 terminated the Commission's authority to use random selection for the issuance of licenses for most communications services, the only method for resolving mutually 106 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-179 See 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(d). 107 See Report and Order and Second NPRM, 12 FCC Rcd at 18642 n.178. 108 Id. 109 See Id. at 18642. 110 Report and Order and Second NPRM, 12 FCC Rcd at 18645. 111 CMC Petition at 11-12. 112 Report and Order and Second NPRM, 12 FCC Rcd at 18645. 113 Id. 114 17 exclusive applications in the 39 GHz
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.txt
  • communicating with one or more nodal stations. * * * * * 10. Section 101.21 is amended by inserting the words "and 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.21(g). 11. Section 101.21 is amended by inserting the words "and 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.21(g). 12. Section 101.45 is amended by adding the words "and in the 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.45(b). 13. Section 101.61 is amended by adding the words ``and in the 24 GHz Service'' to the heading and by inserting, at the end of the section, the sentence: "This section also applies to 24 GHz licensees that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
  • MO (98,705) (111,550) 797 (0.01) Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO (26,665) (28,637) 6,203 (0.23) Qwest - Montana MT NA NA NA NA Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE 11,693 8,615 4,160 0.36 Qwest - Nebraska NE NA NA NA NA Sprint - Centel of Nevada NV 26,802 20,749 8,373 31.24 Verizon - Contel Nevada NV 1,931 1,242 1,959 101.45 SBC - Nevada Bell NV 26,849 21,738 16,262 60.57 Verizon - New England - New Hampshire NH 26,037 11,704 17,652 67.80 Verizon - New Jersey NJ (1,572,715) (1,610,135) 218,400 (13.89) Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ 7,818 6,013 4,297 54.96 11 - 27 Table 11.13 2002 Total Other Investments - Continued ($000) Study Area State Subject to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • MO (98,703) (111,641) (2,674) 0.03 Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO (26,665) (28,637) 6,203 (0.23) Qwest - Montana MT 39,915 37,854 3,973 0.10 Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE 11,693 8,615 4,160 0.36 Qwest - Nebraska NE (12,594) (16,656) 9,599 (0.76) Sprint - Centel of Nevada NV 26,802 20,749 8,373 31.24 Verizon - Contel Nevada NV 1,931 1,242 1,959 101.45 SBC - Nevada Bell NV 26,846 21,715 16,403 61.10 Verizon - New England - New Hampshire NH 26,037 11,704 17,652 67.80 Verizon - New Jersey NJ (1,572,715) (1,610,135) 218,400 (13.89) Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ 7,818 6,013 4,297 54.96 11 - 53 Table 11.13 Total Other Investment - Continued ($000) - 2003 Study Area State Subject
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Filings/fl000414.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Filings/fl000414.html
  • Docket No. 93-144). Reply Comments - Southern Company. April 7 In the Matter of RIO GRANCE BROADCASTING CO./ROBERTO PASSALACQUA/IRENE RODRIGUEZ DIAZ DE MCOMAS/UNITED STATES BROADCASTERS COMPANY For Construction Permit for a new FM Broadcast Station on Channel No. 247A at Rio Grande, Puerto Rico). Petition for Leave to Amend - United Broadcasters Company. In the Matter of Amendment of Section 101.45 of the Commission's Rules Regarding Interference to Geostationary Satellites from Point-to-Point Terrestrial Microwave Stations (RM 9830). Comments - COMSAT Corporation, Digital Microwave Corporation, Harris Corporation Microwave Communications Division. -3- In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.202(b) of the Rules (Table of Allotments)(Barnwell, SC; Pembroke, GA; Douglas, GA; Willacoochee, GA)(MM Docket No. 00-18/RM 9790). Reply Comments of Opposition to Counterproposal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • 101.37 Public notice period (move to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 1.933 101.39 Dismissal and return of applications (move to 1.934 consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.41 Ownership changes and agreements to amend or dismiss 1.919, 1.927, 1.935 applications or pleadings (partially removed and rest moved to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.43 Opposition to applications (move to consolidated Part 1 1.939 Rule). 101.45 Mutually exclusive applications (revise to delete 101.45 reference to random selection procedure) 101.47 Consideration of applications (move to consolidated Part1.915 1 Rule). 101.53 Assignment or transfer of station authorizations (move 1.948 to consolidated Part 1 Rule). 101.57 Modification of station license (move to consolidated 1.947 Part 1 Rule). 101.59 Major/minor modifications (move to consolidated Part 11.929 Rule). 101.61 Certain modifications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99333.doc
  • notice listing: * * * * * (1) The acceptance for filing of common carrier applications, Local Multipoint Distribution Service applications, 24GHz Service applications, and major amendments thereto; * * * * * (3) The receipt of common carrier applications, Local Multipoint Distribution Service applications, and 24 GHz Service applications for minor modifications made pursuant to � 101.59; 15. Section 101.45 is proposed to be amended by adding the words "and in the 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.45(b). 16. Section 101.57 is proposed to be amended by inserting the words "or in the 24 GHz Service after the effective date of the Order" after the words "March 11, 1997" in subsection 101.57(a)(1)(ii). 17.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992740.doc
  • On October 21, 1994, DCT filed an amendment to its New York, NY application to request only Channel 2 A/B, which was placed on public notice on January 11, 1995. Because DCT's original application did not contain a request for Channel 2A/B, its October 21, 1994 amendment requesting Channel 2A/B is deemed a major amendment pursuant to Sections 101.29(c)(1)(i) and 101.45(c) of the Commission's Rules. Thus, DCT's application received a new filing date of October 21, 1994, which is more than sixty days after the July 6, 1994 public notice announcing the acceptance of WinStar's applications for filing. Accordingly, DCT's late-filed competing application is subject to dismissal pursuant to Section 101.45(e) of the Commission's Rules. Moreover, WinStar's application as to Channel
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992819.doc
  • J. Regiec, Acting Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, to Mr. Ed Clinton, President, Plaincom, Inc. (Aug. 20, 1997). Plaincom Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 22954 � 2. Id. Id. Public notice of the dismissal was released on September 2, 1997. Id. at 2954 � 1. Id. at 2956 � 6. 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(a) explains that a competing application must be tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of public notice listing the first of the conflicting applications as accepted for filing. Plaincom Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 2955 � 3. Id. at 2955-56 �� 4-5. Petition at 5-8. Former Section 101.147(u) of the Commission's Rules required self-defined 39 GHz service areas
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da993020.doc
  • asserts that the two amendments brought its application into compliance with Commission policy and eliminated a frequency conflict with another pending application, and as such should be deemed amendments of right, which are effective when filed - even if filed after December 15, 1995. Plaincom also argues that the filing freeze in effect improperly modified or eliminated Sections 101.29 and 101.45 of the Commission's Rules without notice and opportunity for comment in violation of Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act. Plaincom's third argument is that the dismissal of its amendments violates Section 309(j)(6)(E) of the Communications Act, which requires the FCC to use methods such as negotiation and its own service rules to resolve mutual exclusivity before it holds an
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99347.doc
  • of a freeze). July 1999 MO&O, � 10. Compare Jan. 17 MO&O, 12 FCC Rcd at 2918 (amendments of right tendered before freeze were effective upon filing). 47 C.F.R. �� 21.23, 21.29, 21.31, 21.100 (1995). Commco Application for Review (filed June 6, 1997) at 7-9. July 1999 MO&O, �� 32-38, where we rejected Commco's arguments regarding 47 C.F.R. �� 101.29(a), 101.45(f)(2), the sections that replaced 47 C.F.R. �� 21.23(a), 21.31(e)(2) with regard to fixed microwave services. We generally dismiss and do not consider petitions that raise arguments that have previously been considered and rejected. See id., � 9. The other rules cited by Commco, 47 C.F.R. �� 21.29 and 21.100, do not provide applicants with any additional rights, but merely harmonize
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000100.doc
  • at 1 � 1. See, e.g., American Trucking Ass'n v. Frisco Transportation Co., 358 U.S. 145 (1958); Howard Sober, Inc. v. I.C.C., 628 F.2d 36 (D.C. Cir. 1980); APC PCS LLC et. al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 23570 (1998); Hazle-Tone Order, 13 FCC Rcd at. 1551 � 10. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i); see also Advanced Radio Technology Ltd., Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 2130, 2131-32 (PSPWD 1999). FCC File No. 9504370. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1134 (rel. May 10, 1995). FCC File No. 9504852. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1136 (rel. May 24, 1995). See Amendment
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000150.doc
  • As noted above, however, DCT specifically disputed that conclusion. See, e.g., Letter from Marilyn J. McDermett, Associate Managing Director, FCC, to Jerrold D. Miller, Esq., 8 FCC Rcd 8817 (Nov. 23, 1993); Letter from Marilyn J. McDermett, Associate Managing Director, FCC, to Robert Ladd, 6 FCC Rcd 7066 (Oct. 8, 1991). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i). Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rule Making, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18642 � 90 (1997), aff'd, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12442-43 � 25 (1999). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-150 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-150 ? @
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000379.doc
  • DCT applications. On November 28, 1995, DCT filed amendments to both its Spokane and Kalamazoo applications in order to resolve any mutual exclusivity that existed with Milliwave's first-filed applications. On April 28, 1999, the Division released an Order granting Milliwave's petition to deny and dismissing the DCT applications. The Division concluded that the DCT applications were untimely pursuant to Section 101.45(b) of the Commission's Rules, because they were filed more than sixty days after the Milliwave applications with which they conflicted were placed on public notice. Discussion. Section 101.45(b) states that no application will be entitled to comparative consideration with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000653.doc
  • (Biztel). Biztel's application established a cut-off date of July 10, 1995 for filing competing applications. On August 25, 1995, WinStar filed a 39 GHz application for Channels 11A and 11B in the area of Stockton, CA. WinStar's application conflicted with the referenced applications filed by GEC and Biztel. On December 10, 1996, Biztel's application was dismissed as defective. Under Section 101.45(b) of the Commission's Rules, no application will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to comparative consideration with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of the public notice listing the first of the conflicting applications as accepted for filing. If an application
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000713.doc
  • Wireless Division, Licensing and Techncial Analysis Branch (Branch) dismissed Likins's Lorain and Santa Rosa applications, pursuant to Section 1.934(f) of the Commission's Rules. The Branch found that Likins's applications conflicted with the previously-filed AT&T and Bay Area applications, and that, because Likins's applications were filed more than sixty days after the first-filed applications, Likins's applications were untimely pursuant to Section 101.45 of the Commission's Rules. On October 1, 1999, and October 27, 1999, Likins filed letters requesting a stay of the dismissals or, alternatively, reinstatement nunc pro tunc of his applications. 5. Discussion. Likins notes in both requests that he has filed an appeal seeking judicial review of the Commission's 39 GHz orders. He states that one of the issues in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000714.doc
  • 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18605 (1997) (Report and Order and Second NPRM). Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket No. 95-183, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-12448 � 37 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). July 29 MO&O at 12450-12452 � 44. Dismissal Letter at 1. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(f) (providing for the dismissal of early- or late-filed applications). Request. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). Request at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 3. See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958) (Virginia Petroleum), as revised by Washington
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000715.doc
  • 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18605 � 3 (1997) (Report and Order and Second NPRM). Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket No. 95-183, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-12448 � 37 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). Id. at 12450-12452 � 44. Dismissal Letter at 1. Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(f) (providing for dismissal of early- or late-filed applications). Request. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999) (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). Request at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 3. See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958) (Virginia
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000716.doc
  • 30-day public notice period was not completed by the November 13, 1995 Freeze Order'' date. 4. On August 26, 1999, the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch) dismissed Likins's application. The mutually exclusive portion of the application had been filed after the sixty-day cut-off period created by the GEC application, thus, pursuant to Section 101.45(b) of the Commission's Rules, it was untimely. The remaining portion of the application was dismissed because that portion had not satisfied the thirty-day public notice requirement as of November 13, 1995. 5. Discussion. Likins notes that he has filed an appeal seeking judicial review of the Commission's 39 GHz orders. Likins states that one of the issues in that case
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000807.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-807 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-807 & � � @& ... � � � " � � " � � � � � � � � � � 0 � ... � � � � � � " � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000808.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-808 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-808 p @& T 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000815.doc
  • and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-457 �� 83-97 (1997) (Report and Order); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9509664. DCT Petition for Reconsideration at 5 (filed Dec. 22, 1999) (Petition). Petition at 5. 39 GHz Applications Dismissed, Public Notice, DA 99-2631 (rel. Nov. 23, 1999). FCC File No. 9507189. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Part 21 Weekly Receipts and Disposals,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000825.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-825 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-825 @& 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001118.doc
  • reconsideration of the dismissal of the February Amendment. Plaincom had argued, inter alia, that the December Amendment contained a clerical error, and that the February Amendment, which attempted to correct this error, was an amendment of right, effective upon filing. The Division determined, however, that the February Amendment was properly dismissed because it did not satisfy the requirements of Section 101.45(f) of the Commission's Rules, in that there was no evidence within the four corners of the December Amendment to indicate a clerical error existed. On November 23, 1999, we dismissed, inter alia, the Plaincom and Astrolink applications in accordance with the July 1999 MO&O. On November 29, 1999, Astrolink requested reconsideration of the Division's Plaincom Order. On the same date,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001129.doc
  • and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997) (R&O and Second NPRM); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Daisy chains occur when an application is mutually exclusive, i.e would cause interference, with an application in an adjacent community, which is mutually exclusive with an application in another adjacent community, and so on. Low Power Television and Television Translator Service, Report and Order, MM
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001397.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-97 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1397 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1397 f � @& t u w x � � (c) � " � (R) � � � � � � � � � � � 0 u t u u w w x x
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001532.doc
  • on Channels 4A/B and 13A/B in New York, NY. On October 21, 1994, DCT filed an amendment to its New York application to request only Channel 2A/B. Because DCT's original application did not contain a request for Channel 2A/B, it was deemed that DCT's October 21, 1994, amendment requesting Channel 2A/B was a major amendment pursuant to Sections 101.29(c)(1)(i) and 101.45(c) of the Commission's Rules. Thus, DCT's application received a new filing date of October 21, 1994, which was more than sixty days after the July 6, 1994, public notice announcing the acceptance of WinStar's applications for filing. Accordingly, in the Order, the Division dismissed DCT's late-filed competing New York application pursuant to Section 101.45(e) of the Commission's Rules. As previously
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00052.doc
  • On May 18, 1995, DCT filed a competing 39 GHz application in the West Palm Beach, Florida, area. On August 7, 1995, DCT filed an amendment to its application to eliminate the geographic overlap with WinStar's Miami Application. On September 11, 1997, the Division's Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch) dismissed DCT's West Palm Beach Application in accordance with Sections 101.45 and 101.35 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 101.45, 101.35. Section 101.45 provides that no application will be entitled to be included in a random selection process or to comparative consideration with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of the public notice listing the first
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00069.doc
  • policy, which were pointed out in its petition for reconsideration.'' It argues that, pursuant to Section 553 of the APA, the Commission may not revoke a substantive right without a notice and comment proceeding. Sintra argues that, due to the freeze on acceptance of amendments of right following December 15, 1995, the Commission effectively revoked former Section 101.29 and Section 101.45 without a notice and comment proceeding. Although the Commission fully addressed these issues in the July 29 MO&O, we will nevertheless reiterate our findings as they apply to the above-captioned application. First, it is well settled that an application freeze is the type of procedural action that may be adopted without notice and comment. Moreover, Sintra's argument does not distinguish
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00143.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-143 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-143 & � � @& _ _ _ _ $ % & ' ( W X Y [ \ ] ` 0 ( W ` # Z ` # ` # ` ` _
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00144.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC-00-144 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-144 9 : � � � � @& 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00145.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-145 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-145 B C � � � @& 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00146.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Plaincom, Inc., Order, 14 FCC Rcd 3349 (WTB PSPWD 1999). Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. FCC, 326 U.S. 327 (1945). Application for Review at 23. WinStar Opposition at 20, citing Reuters Limited v. FCC, 781 F.2d 946, 951 (D.C. Cir. 1986). 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1994).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00147.doc
  • and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-147 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-147 ! # � " � @& 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00148.doc
  • and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997) (R&O and Second NPRM); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). See Bachow Supplement to Application for Review at 3-5. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-148 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-148 o p � s @& 0 # + G O � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00150.doc
  • and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-150 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-150 C � � � @& ... ... ... ... . 0 1 ? J K L M N } ~  � � � � 0 N } � 2 < ? I �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00151.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-151 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-151 I � � @& $ 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00152.doc
  • Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9506008. See Altron Application for Review at 1. See February Order, � 5. See id., � 9. See Altron Application for Review at 4-5. (citing Establishment of a Fee Collection Program to Implement the Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00156.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC-00-156 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-156 = � � � �@��� @& - � � � � � � � � � 0 � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00157.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-157 � � � � � @& 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00158.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). File Nos. 9507730, 9507733, 9507737, 9507751, 9507759, 9507766, 9507767, 9507770, 9507772, 9507776, 9507778, 9507779, 9507782, 9507789, 9507790, 9507792, 9507802, 9507804. File Nos. 9510581, 9510582, 9510583, 9510584, 9510585, 9510588, 9601235, 9601242, 9601243, 9601244, 9601246, 9601247, 9601248, 9601249. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-158 Federal Communications Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00176.doc
  • Facilities in the 39 GHz Frequency Band at Various Locations Throughout the United States, and Plaincom, Inc., for License to Operate a Point-to-Point Microwave Facility in the 39 GHz Frequency Band in St. Louis, Missouri, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 17821 (WTB PSPWD 1999) (Order). Application for Review at 4. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9510171. FCC File Nos. 9600669, 9600676, 9600679, 9600680, 9600684, 9600686, 9600687, 9600688, 9600689, 9600692, 9600697, 9600699, 9600702, 9600704, 9600707, 9600709. Public Notice, Private Radio Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1090 (rel. Jul. 6, 1994). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00225.doc
  • placed on public notice on April 5, 1995. On July 17, 1995, Plaincom filed the above-referenced 39 GHz application for the Lancaster, PA area. Plaincom's proposed area overlapped BizTel's proposed service area. On November 18, 1996, the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch) dismissed the BizTel application as defective. On August 20, 1997, the Branch dismissed the Plaincom application. Section 101.45 states that no application will be consolidated for hearing with a previously filed application unless such application is substantially complete and tendered for filing within sixty days after the date of the public notice listing the first of the conflicting applications as accepted for filing. The Branch found that the Plaincom application was untimely filed because the relevant sixty-day cut-off
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00272.doc
  • communicating with one or more nodal stations. * * * * * 10. Section 101.21 is amended by inserting the words "and 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.21(g). 11. Section 101.21 is amended by inserting the words "and 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.21(g). 12. Section 101.45 is amended by adding the words "and in the 24 GHz Service" after the words "Local Multipoint Distribution Service" in subsection 101.45(b). 13. Section 101.61 is amended by adding the words ``and in the 24 GHz Service'' to the heading and by inserting, at the end of the section, the sentence: "This section also applies to 24 GHz licensees that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00315.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Application for Review at 1, 6. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (Consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit System v. Holiday
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00316.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). See AA&T Wireless Services, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5902 (WTB PSPWD rel. Mar. 30, 2000). See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00317.doc
  • and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997) (Report and Order and Second NPRM); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File Nos. 9510394 and 9510406. FCC File Nos. 9510391 and 9510393. Application for Review at 1, 8. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (Consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00319.doc
  • and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31(b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Therefore, Sintra's claims (Application for Review at 5-6) that its application for authorization did not violate the 60 day cut off for filing mutually exclusive applications is inapposite. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-318 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-319 " # o � � (R)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00320.doc
  • Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). See id. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Letter from Mary Shultz, Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, to Linda Chester (Aug. 27, 1999). Id. Application for Review at 2, 5. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (Consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00321.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9510607. FCC File No. 9510601. Application for Review at 6. Id. FCC File No. 9409617. See Public Notice, Report No. 1118 (rel. Jan. 18, 1995). See Public Notice, Report No. 1142 (rel. Jul. 5, 1995). The authorization was ultimately assigned to ART
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00322.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File Nos. 96001236 and 9601372. FCC File No. 9601240. See Cambridge Partners, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, DA-804 (WTB PSPWD rel. Apr. 10, 2000). See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 1362). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00323.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File No. 9507932. FCC File No. 9600033. See HiCap Networks, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, DA-794 (WTB PSPWD rel. Apr. 10, 2000). See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361 and 99-1362). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00324.doc
  • Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). FCC File Nos. 9505285, 9505295, 9505297, 9505298, 9505299, 9505304, 9506000, 9506008, 9509656, 9510294, 9600055, 9600056, 9600066, 9600067, 9600070, 9600073, and 9600076. William G. Bowles, Jr. d/b/a Mid Missouri Mobilefone, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 61 Rad. Reg. (P&F) 2d 20 (CCB 1986) (Bowles) Answer Fort Smith,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00325.doc
  • � 6 (WTB PSPWD 1999); Applications of Commco, L.L.C., Order, 14 FCC Rcd 17727, 17729 � 6 (WTB PSPWD 1999). See FCC File Nos. 9600663, 9600664, 9600669-9600690, 9600698, 9600710-9600714, 9600719, and 9600720. See Public Notice, Private Radio Bureau Part 21 Receipts and Disposals, Report No. 1090 (rel. July 6, 1994). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45 (b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Application for Review at 5-10. Id. at 13-14 (citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(6)(E)). Id. at 13-14. Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. FCC, 326 U.S. 327 (1945). Application for Review at 11-13. 47 U.S.C. � 405(a). 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(6)(E). Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. FCC, 326
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00328.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). March 30th Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 10079 � 4 (citing Letter from Mary Shultz, Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, to Wireless Telco (Sept. 27, 1999)). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(f) (providing for dismissal of early- or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00329.doc
  • of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997) (Report and Order and Second NPRM); aff'd Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999) (July 29 MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). File Nos. 9405451, 9408036, 9505287, 9505288, 9505289, 9505292, 9505294, 9505308, 9505312, 9510291, 9510296, 9600074. Files Nos. 9510293, 9510300, 9600057, 9600058, 9600059, 9600060, 9600061, 9600062, 9600063, 9600065, 9600068, 9600069, 9600071, 9600072, 9600075. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934. July 29 MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 12441-45 ��
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00331.doc
  • 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600, 18639-45 �� 83-97 (1997), aff'd, Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12428, 12440-51 �� 19-44 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 21.31 (b)(2)(i) (1995); 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(b)(2)(i) (disposition of mutually exclusive applications). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 (dismissal of defective applications). Application for Review at 1, 5. See Bachow Communications, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 99-1346 (Consolidating Case Nos. 99-1361-1362) (D.C. Cir. 1999). See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 291 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit System v. Holiday
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/99-1346.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/99-1346.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/99-1346.pdf
  • restrict the Commission's choice of an overall license allocation mechanism. * * * The Commission's dismissal of pending 39 GHz applications, use of a 30-day "ripeness" period, and imposition of an amendment cut-off date were reasonable and in accordance with law. We therefore deny the petitions for review and affirm the Commission's orders. So ordered. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 101.45(a) ("the Commission will consider applications to be mutually exclusive if their conflicts are such that the grant of one application would effectively preclude by reason of harmful electrical interference, or other practical reason, the grant of one or more of the other applications"). The Commission made other changes to the licensing system not relevant to this appeal. For example, it