FCC Web Documents citing 101.89

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2793A1.txt
  • Band, Blanket Licensing of Satellite Earth Stations in the 17.7-20.2 GHz and 27.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Bands, and the Allocation of Additional Spectrum in the 17.3-17.8 GHz and 24.75-25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for Broadcast Satellite-Service Use, First Order on Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 98-172, FCC 01-323, ¶ 25 (rel. Nov. 1, 2001) (18 GHz Reconsideration Order). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.85(a), 101.89-101.99. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.83, 101.97. Secondary operations may not cause interference to operations authorized on a primary basis and are not protected from interference from primary operations. Thus, an incumbent operating under a secondary authorization must cease operations if it poses an interference problem to an FSS or MSS licensee. See, e.g., 18 GHz Reconsideration Order, ¶ 91. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2669A1.txt
  • Band, Blanket Licensing of Satellite Earth Stations in the 17.7-20.2 GHz and 27.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Bands, and the Allocation of Additional Spectrum in the 17.3-17.8 GHz and 24.75-25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for Broadcast Satellite-Service Use, First Order on Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 98-172, 16 FCC Rcd 19808, 19820-19821 ¶ 25 (2001) (18 GHz Reconsideration Order). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.85(a), 101.89-101.99. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.83, 101.97. Secondary operations may not cause interference to operations authorized on a primary basis and are not protected from interference from primary operations. Thus, an incumbent operating on a secondary basis must cease operations if it causes interference to an FSS or MSS licensee. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.97; see also 18 GHz Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-987A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-987A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-987A1.txt
  • Band, Blanket Licensing of Satellite Earth Stations in the 17.7-20.2 GHz and 27.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Bands, and the Allocation of Additional Spectrum in the 17.3-17.8 GHz and 24.75-25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for Broadcast Satellite-Service Use, First Order on Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 98-172, 16 FCC Rcd 19808, 19820-19821 ¶ 25 (2001) (18 GHz Reconsideration Order). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.85(a), 101.89-101.99. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.83, 101.97. Secondary operations may not cause interference to operations authorized on a primary basis and are not protected from interference from primary operations. Thus, an incumbent operating under a secondary authorization must cease operations if it causes interference to an FSS or MSS licensee. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.97; see also 18 GHz Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1.txt
  • Service licensees currently operating in the 18.3-19.3 GHz band, Boeing must demonstrate when applying for feeder-link earth station licenses that the proposed uplink operation would not interfere with, or require protection from, operation of any existing FS station at its current site in the event that the FS station's assigned frequencies were to be shifted pursuant to Section 101.85, Section 101.89, Section 101.91, or Section 101.95 of the Commission's rules. (Boeing will also have to coordinate its proposed feeder-link stations with terrestrial stations pursuant to Section 25.203.) The showing should employ the standard techniques cross-referenced in relevant rule provisions for determining the extent of geographic separation necessary for interference avoidance. Fourth, because Boeing has not indicated a definite need for more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2073A1_Erratum.doc
  • Service licensees currently operating in the 18.3-19.3 GHz band, Boeing must demonstrate when applying for feeder-link earth station licenses that the proposed uplink operation would not interfere with, or require protection from, operation of any existing FS station at its current site in the event that the FS station's assigned frequencies were to be shifted pursuant to Section 101.85, Section 101.89, Section 101.91, or Section 101.95 of the Commission's rules. (Boeing will also have to coordinate its proposed feeder-link stations with terrestrial stations pursuant to Section 25.203.) The showing should employ the standard techniques cross-referenced in relevant rule provisions for determining the extent of geographic separation necessary for interference avoidance. Fourth, because Boeing has not indicated a definite need for more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3029A1.txt
  • Band, Blanket Licensing of Satellite Earth Stations in the 17.7-20.2 GHz and 27.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Bands, and the Allocation of Additional Spectrum in the 17.3-17.8 GHz and 24.75-25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for Broadcast Satellite-Service Use, First Order on Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 98-172, 16 FCC Rcd 19808, 19820-19821 ¶ 25 (2001) (18 GHz Reconsideration Order). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.85(a), 101.89-101.99. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.83, 101.97. Secondary operations may not cause interference to operations authorized on a primary basis and are not protected from interference from primary operations. Thus, an incumbent operating on a secondary basis must cease operations if it causes interference to an FSS or MSS licensee. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.97; see also 18 GHz Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1492A1.txt
  • 18.3-19.3 GHz band, we expect MSV to demonstrate when applying for feeder link earth station licenses that the proposed uplink operation would not interfere with, or require protection from, the operation of any existing Fixed Service station at its current site in the event that the Fixed Service station's assigned frequencies were to be shifted pursuant to Section 101.85, Section 101.89, Section 101.91, or Section 101.95 of the Commission's rules. In addition to protecting fixed and mobile services, we also expect MSV to protect other services operating in the bands it will be using. First, the 12.75-13.25 GHz band is allocated to the space research service (deep space) (space-to-Earth) for reception only at Goldstone, California. We require MSV to take ``all
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1492A1_Erratum.doc
  • 18.3-19.3 GHz band, we expect MSV to demonstrate when applying for feeder link earth station licenses that the proposed uplink operation would not interfere with, or require protection from, the operation of any existing Fixed Service station at its current site in the event that the Fixed Service station's assigned frequencies were to be shifted pursuant to Section 101.85, Section 101.89, Section 101.91, or Section 101.95 of the Commission's rules. In addition to protecting fixed and mobile services, we also expect MSV to protect other services operating in the bands it will be using. First, the 12.75-13.25 GHz band is allocated to the space research service (deep space) (space-to-Earth) for reception only at Goldstone, California. We require MSV to take ``all
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-239A1.txt
  • the 17.7-19.7 GHz Frequency Band, Blanket Licensing of Satellite Earth Stations in the 17.7-20.2 GHz and 27.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Bands, and the Allocation of Additional Spectrum in the 17.3-17.8 GHz and 24.75-25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for Broadcast Satellite-Service Use, First Order on Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 98-172, 16 FCC Rcd 19808, 19820-19821 ¶ 25 (2001). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.85(a), 101.89-101.99. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.83, 101.97. Secondary operations may not cause interference to operations authorized on a primary basis and are not protected from interference from primary operations. Thus, an incumbent operating on a secondary basis must cease operations if it causes interference to an FSS or MSS licensee. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.97; see also 18 GHz Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.txt
  • GHz band, MSV states that it will demonstrate when applying for feeder link earth station licenses that the proposed uplink operation would not interfere with, or require protection from, the operation of any existing Fixed service station at its current site in the event that the Fixed Service station's assigned frequencies were to be shifted pursuant to Section 101.85, Section 101.89, Section 101.91, or Section 101.95 of the Commission's rules. In addition to protecting Fixed and Mobile services, MSV says that it will protect other services operating in the bands it will be using. Footnote US251 to Section 2.106 of the Commission's rules states that the 12.75-13.25 band is allocated to the Space Research Service (deep space) (space-to-Earth) for reception only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1_Erratum.doc
  • GHz band, MSV states that it will demonstrate when applying for feeder link earth station licenses that the proposed uplink operation would not interfere with, or require protection from, the operation of any existing Fixed service station at its current site in the event that the Fixed Service station's assigned frequencies were to be shifted pursuant to Section 101.85, Section 101.89, Section 101.91, or Section 101.95 of the Commission's rules. In addition to protecting Fixed and Mobile services, MSV says that it will protect other services operating in the bands it will be using. Footnote US251 to Section 2.106 of the Commission's rules states that the 12.75-13.25 band is allocated to the Space Research Service (deep space) (space-to-Earth) for reception only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
  • 2110-2150 MHz, and 2160-2200 MHz bands from the fixed microwave services to personal communications services and emerging technologies. 101.73 Mandatory negotiations. 101.75 Involuntary relocation procedures. 101.81 Future licensing in the 1850-1990 MHz, 2110-2150 MHz, and 2160-2200 MHz bands. 101.83 Modification of station license. 101.85 Transition of the 18.3-19.3 GHz band from the terrestrial fixed services to the fixed-satellite service (FSS). 101.89 Negotiations. 101.91 Involuntary relocation procedures. 101.95 Sunset provisions for licensees in the 18.30-19.30 GHz band. 101.97 Future licensing in the 18.30-19.30 GHz band. SUBPART C-TECHNICAL STANDARDS Brief Description: Subpart C sets forth technical standards for applications and licenses in the Fixed Microwave Services. Need: The revised rules establish revised technical standards for the 24 GHz Service, Multiple Address Systems, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-212A1.txt
  • No. 95-18, ICO Services Limited (ICO) suggested that these criteria be included in the section of the rules that governs mandatory negotiations. We believe that this change is appropriate for the negotiation rules we are adopting at 18 GHz, as it would be useful to define the target of negotiations. For this reason, we are including these criteria in Section 101.89 of the rules we are adopting. As a final note on relocation, we recognize that this Report and Order puts into place a process that will affect a significant number of fixed microwave links. We urge the affected parties to find ways to minimize the cost and facilitate the introduction of new satellite services. We believe it should be possible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-323A1.txt
  • or assignee to retain primary status. We are not persuaded by Teledesic's argument that denying the new owner the benefit of primary status will promote band segmentation while lowering the total social cost of the transition because it would not involve relocation. Measure and Mitigation of Relocation Costs. We reaffirm our decision to adopt the relocation rules codified in sections 101.89 and 101.91 because we conclude that it is appropriate to apply in this band the established policy that we have employed in other similar circumstances. In so doing, we reject Teledesic's proposal that the Commission use other approaches to relocation that are plainly inconsistent with the Commission's goal of enabling an incumbent that is required to relocate to construct a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-317A1.txt
  • that private arrangements among the GSO FSS operators and the terrestrial licensees in the 29.25-29.5 GHz band can protect terrestrial operations without the need for formal frequency coordination. See 47 C.F.R §§ 101.69, 101.71. A terrestrial user contacted by a satellite user may not refuse to negotiate and all parties are required to negotiate in good faith. 47 C.F.R § 101.89(b). In deciding whether the parties have negotiated in good faith, the Commission considers factors including whether the satellite operator has made a bona fide offer of relocation and whether, if the terrestrial user demanded a premium, the premium was proportionate to the cost of providing comparable facilities. Id. ``Comparable facilities'' are defined in terms of ``throughput'' or capacity, reliability, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-317A1_Erratum.doc
  • that private arrangements among the GSO FSS operators and the terrestrial licensees in the 29.25-29.5 GHz band can protect terrestrial operations without the need for formal frequency coordination. See 47 C.F.R §§ 101.69, 101.71. A terrestrial user contacted by a satellite user may not refuse to negotiate and all parties are required to negotiate in good faith. 47 C.F.R § 101.89(b). In deciding whether the parties have negotiated in good faith, the Commission considers factors including whether the satellite operator has made a bona fide offer of relocation and whether, if the terrestrial user demanded a premium, the premium was proportionate to the cost of providing comparable facilities. Id. ``Comparable facilities'' are defined in terms of ``throughput'' or capacity, reliability, and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da012793.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da012793.txt
  • Blanket Licensing of Satellite Earth Stations in the 17.7-20.2 GHz and 27.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Bands, and the Allocation of Additional Spectrum in the 17.3-17.8 GHz and 24.75-25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for Broadcast Satellite-Service Use, First Order on Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 98-172, FCC 01-323, ¶ 25 (rel. Nov. 1, 2001) (18 GHz Reconsideration Order). 7 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.85(a), 101.89-101.99. 8 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.83, 101.97. Secondary operations may not cause interference to operations authorized on a primary basis and are not protected from interference from primary operations. Thus, an incumbent operating under a secondary authorization must cease operations if it poses an interference problem to an FSS or MSS licensee. See, e.g., 18 GHz Reconsideration Order, ¶ 91.
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1466.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1466.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1466.pdf
  • with them. This negotiation period begins with the adoption of the Report and Order and lasts for two years in most cases, and for three years for terrestrial public safety services. 47 C.F.R. § 101.85(c). A terrestrial user contacted by a satellite user may not refuse to negotiate and all parties are required to negotiate in good faith. Id. § 101.89(b). In deciding whether the parties have negotiated in good faith, the FCC will consider factors including whether the satellite has made a bona fide offer of relocation and whether, if the terrestrial user demanded a premium, the premium was proportionate to the cost of providing comparable facilities. Id. "Comparable facilities" are defined by the regulations in terms of "through-put" or